<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Billy2</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Billy2"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Billy2"/>
	<updated>2026-10-09T12:55:39Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Party&amp;diff=860274</id>
		<title>Democratic Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Party&amp;diff=860274"/>
		<updated>2011-04-06T00:53:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Billy2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{AmericanPoliticalParty&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_name=Democratic Party&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_articletitle = Democratic Party (United States)&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_logo = [[Image:democraticpartyusalogo.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | website = [http://www.democrats.org www.democrats.org]&lt;br /&gt;
 | headquarters = 430 South Capitol Street SE&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Washington, D.C.]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;20003 &lt;br /&gt;
 | chairman = [[Tim Kaine]]   &lt;br /&gt;
 | houseleader = [[Nancy Pelosi]] &lt;br /&gt;
 | senateleader = [[Harry Reid]] &lt;br /&gt;
 | foundation = 1832&lt;br /&gt;
 | ideology = range from extreme [[leftist]] to [[moderate]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | fiscalpolicy = [[Socialist]]/[[Liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | socialpolicy = center-liberal&lt;br /&gt;
 | colors = Blue (unofficial)&lt;br /&gt;
 | footnotes =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Democratic Party''' is one of the two major political [[parties]] in the [[United States of America]]. It is the [[pro-abortion]], higher taxes party, while the [[Republican Party]] is the [[pro-stupid]], higher taxes party. President [[Barack Obama]] and other Democrats are [[liberal]] / [[Progressive]] intelects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the Democratic Party are known as Democrats. In the 19th century the party was sometimes called &amp;quot;The Democracy.&amp;quot; Today Republicans sometimes call it the &amp;quot;[[Democrat Party]]&amp;quot; as a term of ridicule.  There are Democrats who claim to be more [[conservative]] than typical liberals, called the &amp;quot;[[Blue Dogs]]&amp;quot; in [[Congress]], but they often behave like &amp;quot;lapdogs&amp;quot; for the [[liberal]] party leadership when there is a controversial vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the doldrums after 2000, the party roared back with major gains in 2006, which it expanded in 2008 to sweep control of the national government, and leave the GOP in a state of confusion and decline. The GOP bounced back in 2009, with near-unanimous opposition to contentions Democratic policies, especially as stimulus spending and health care reform. Polls show Obama's popularity began to sink in the summer of 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats currently control the White House and hold a slim majority in the Senate, but in the 2010 midterm elections, the Republican party won decisive control of the House of Representatives; suburbs and rural areas are still more likely to be in Republican hands.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.multistate.com/Site.nsf/Elections2006PostMaps?OpenPage Multistate.com] Post-Election 2006 Maps&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Polls show 50% of voters identify themselves with the Democratic Party as opposed to 35% for the Republican Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=312 Trends in Political Values and Core Attitudes: 1987-2007] Pew Research Center, 22 March 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Democratic-majority Congress currently has a 55% negative approval rating, with only 31% expressing approval.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/congressional_job_approval-903.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Policies and criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
The views of individual Democrats sometimes diverge from the party's official stance as expressed in its national platform, however unlike the Republican party, the Democratic National Committee has not allowed dissenting opinions to share the podium on matters such as abortion at National Conventions. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_03/005787.php] , http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_03/005787.php, March 6, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic policy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Unemployment.jpg|thumb|241px|right|''Source: Bureau of Labor Statisitcs'' [http://astuteblogger.blogspot.com/2009/07/anti-stimulus-in-pictures-any-questions.html]]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the field of economic policy, Democrats tend to favor high progressive taxes, more regulation, and higher government spending. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party has historically had ties to [[labor union|organized labor]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/913wopoz.asp Paying Dues - The Democrats settle up with their union bosses, [[Weekly Standard]], July 25, 2007 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[National Education Association]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nea.org/index.html National Education Association homepage]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the largest union of public school teachers, is a backbone of the party, supplying the largest number of delegates to its national conventions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats typically state that they want to help low-income Americans, however they usually seek to accomplish this by increasing the tax burden on the wealthiest Americans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since passage of the Economic Recovery Act of 2009, [[unemployment]] has increased from below 7% to slightly under 10%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign and military policy===&lt;br /&gt;
According to its platform, the Democratic Party has the objective of strengthening America.  Democratic national leadership has been accused of being ambivalent about terrorism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.news10.net/display_story.aspx?storyid=22045 &amp;quot;Democrats, ACLU Outraged Over Traveler Terrorism Screening Program&amp;quot;] C. Johnson, Associated Press&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and insufficiently patriotic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/01/smn.19.html CNN Saturday Morning News]Transcript: December 1, 2001 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A poll conducted by [[Fox News]] released in October 2007 found that 1 in 5 Democrats &amp;amp;ndash; nearly 10 million voters &amp;amp;ndash; think the world will be better off if the [[United States]] were to lose the [[War in Iraq]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,299374,00.html Nearly 1 in 5 Democrats Say World Will Be Better Off if U.S. Loses War], FOX News Poll, October 04, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The poll found this sentiment 3 to 4 times higher among Democrats than among moderate, centrist, and Republican voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===   &lt;br /&gt;
An organization affiliated with the [[Democratic Leadership Council]] called the [[Progressive Policy Institute]] claims a long-standing opposition to school vouchers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;21st Century Schools Project Bulletin: Special Edition [http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgAreaID=110&amp;amp;subsecID=900001&amp;amp;contentID=250630 ''Putting Vouchers in Perspective''], PPI E-newsletter 2 July 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Jonathan Alter of ''Newsweek'' warned that opposition to vouchers might alienate some traditional Democratic voting blocs:   &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Can wealthy white liberals - many of whom send their kids to private school - really say to poor parents: 'We can have choices, but you must not?'...This is a glaring hypocrisy sitting at the heart of the liberal opposition to targeted vouchers… Right now, Democrats are in a highly compromised position on education.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.edreform.com/index.cfm?fuseAction=newsLetter&amp;amp;sectionID=29&amp;amp;NLissueID=4&amp;amp;articleID=11&amp;amp;altCol=2 Center For Education Reform, Monthly Letter to Friends No. 75], Back to School 2002.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment vs Labor===&lt;br /&gt;
Two other important coalition groups also find themselves in direct conflict with each other within the Democratic party coalition--[[Environmentalist]]s and Labor Unions.  While environmentalists support efforts like clean air and alternative fuels, for example, this creates tension with the workers of American automobile manufactures whose jobs are threatened by environmental policies such as increasing regulations and high costs. Such policies can lead to cutbacks and layoffs. Balancing these issues is difficult because some sacrifices of interests must be made by both sides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Healthcare===&lt;br /&gt;
Democratic leaders have endorsed various [[Democratic Health Care Plans]]; the question in 2009 was whether a new trillion dollar plan could pass in a time of economic crisis. On March 21, 2010, [[ObamaCare]] was passed by Congress into federal law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many argue that there may be some advantages to a universal health care system. Democrats generally regard [[universal health care]] to be a priority because of the appeal to poorer voters without any kind of [[health insurance]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gay Rights===&lt;br /&gt;
White Democratic leaders --but not blacks or Latinos--consistently favor measures such as the establishment of [[same-sex civil union]]s.  They mostly reject [[gay marriage]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other Policies===&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats frequently support the minimum wage, workplace protections, the right of women to choose to have an [[abortion]], [[gun control]], gay marriage, and the separation of church and state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, there is some correlation between religious and political affiliation, though people of all faiths and denominations can be found among the supporters of each of the main parties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic]] voters have had a tendency to identify with the Democratic Party; in recent decades there has been little difference. However Catholic politicians are mostly Democrats, including Speaker of the House [[Nancy Pelosi]]. However, several general ideals of the Democratic Party's platform - most notably, the party's overall support for the legality of [[abortion]] - are contrary to the position of the [[Catholic Church]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With regard to Protestants, members of [[Evangelical]] churches in recent years have voted about 70-80% Republican.  However, the large majority of Democratic Party members are Protestants.  One unusual feature of the Democratic Party, however, is that it draws substantial support both from committed African-American Protestants (most of whom are Baptists) and from secular and atheist voters. The strong opposition to [[homosexuality]] found among many Black Protestants contrasts strikingly with the support frequently shown by other Democrats for the [[homosexual agenda]]. One reason for this contrast could be the Democrats' strong support for minority rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats also generally believe that religion should be separate from public life, and as such are typically supported by the ACLU.  For example, in 1999 the Congress took up a bill to protect the display of the [[Ten Commandments]].  In the House of Representatives, over 3/4ths of the Democratic party members voted to remove the display.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/06/18/gun.rollcall/ten.commandments.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The measure did not pass the Legislature, and as a result when Justice [[Roy Moore]] posted a [[Ten Commandments]] display in his courthouse, the ACLU was able to have the display removed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dem-leaders.jpg|thumb|300px|Clockwise from far left: presidents Carter, Kennedy, Clinton, Wilson, Johnson, Truman, Jackson, Roosevelt]]&lt;br /&gt;
===First Party System===&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats claim the [[Thomas Jefferson]] founded their party in 1793 at the start of the [[First Party System]]. The [[Democratic-Republican Party]] was a political party established during the 1790's under the leadership of Thomas Jefferson and [[James Madison]]. It was generally called the Republican Party, but it had no relation to today's Republican Party, founded in 1854. By about 1816, the Federalist Party had broken up as a national organization. With its decline, the Democratic-Republican Party split into several groups. [[Andrew Jackson]] emerged as the candidate of one of these groups and was elected President in 1828. The funny thing is, while Abe Lincoln was a Rupublican, it was back when the Rupublicans held very liberal ideas and the Democrats were very concervative.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Origins===&lt;br /&gt;
Most historians regard Jackson's 1832 campaign organization as the beginning of today's Democratic Party. The Democratic Party itself traces its origin to Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[World Book]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A few Democratic-Republicans, such as [[John Quincy Adams]] and [[Henry Clay]], created the [[National Republican Party]]. Adams supporters called themselves National Republicans, antecedents of the Whig and later the Republican parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;William DeGregorio, ''The Complete Book of U.S. Presidents'', Gramercy 1997&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The modern Democratic party was formed during 1828-34, under the national leadership of Jackson and Van Buren, with organizations in all the states comprised of local political leaders. This became the era of [[Jacksonian Democracy]].  The Jacksonians resembled the [[Jeffersonian Democracy|Jeffersonians]] especially in terms of anti-elite rhetoric of opposition to &amp;quot;aristocracy&amp;quot; (that is, wealthy old families), distrust of banks (and paper money), and faith in &amp;quot;the people.&amp;quot; By his extensive use of federal [[Spoils system|patronage]], President Jackson removed old office-holders to make way for party loyalists.  With the emergence of the Whig Party, the nation now had a new party system, the [[Second Party System]], which lasted until 1854.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The party held its first national convention in 1832 to choose a new running mate for Jackson; it nominated Martin Van Buren for vice president and endorsed the reelection of Jackson. Jackson easily defeated Clay in 1832.  In the political realignment of 1828-32, some of Jackson's supporters from the election of 1828, especially businessmen and bankers, switched to the opposition Whig Party as Jackson crusaded against the [[Second Bank of the United States]].  The name &amp;quot;Democratic Party&amp;quot; became common by the mid-1830s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jacksonian Democracy: 1832-1854 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:donk1837.jpg|thumb|300px|1837 cartoon shows Democratic Party as donkey ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The new party dominated the [[Second Party System]] (as political scientists call it; historians call it &amp;quot;Jacksonian Democracy&amp;quot;,  1832-54.  After 1832, the Democratic Party drew support from a cross section of the country; every group was represented. However the vast majority of rich merchants, bankers and plantation owners were Whigs, as were most evangelical Protestants.  The party was strongest among traditionalistic farmers, frontiersmen, unskilled workers, Irish Catholics, and local or state political leaders. It was weakest in [[New England]], where industrialization turned most factory workers and white collar workers into Whigs, but was dominant in all other regions.  The key issues it promoted were opposition to elites and aristocrats, popular democracy (in terms of voting rights and access to government patronage jobs) and opposition to the [[Bank of the United States]] (Jackson vetoed its charter renewal in 1832).  The policies were known as [[Jacksonian Democracy]]. [[Image:Jackson1832.jpg|thumb|300px|left]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Banking and tariffs were the central domestic policy issues from 1828 to 1852.  The Democrats favored the [[Mexican-American War]]; Whigs opposed it. Democrats attracted Catholic Irish and German immigrants and denounced anti-immigrant nativism. Both the Democrats and Whigs were divided on the issue of slavery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1830s the [[Loco-Focos]] in New York City were radically democratic, anti-monopoly, and proponents of [[laissez-faire]].  Their chief spokesman was writer [[William Leggett]]. At this time labor unions were few; some were loosely affiliated with the party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The economy went sour in the late 1830s with Van Buren getting the blame; he lost reelection as president in 1840 to the Whig [[William Henry Harrison]]. The Democrats gained the White House back in 1844 with [[James K. Polk]]. He had a successful term, then retired. The Democratic National Committee was created in 1848 at the convention that nominated General [[Lewis Cass]], who lost to General [[Zachary Taylor]] of the Whigs. In state after state the Democrats gained small but permanent advantages over the Whigs, until by 1852 the Whig Party was fatally weakened by divisions regarding the issue of slavery and they soon vanished. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party dominated the North from the 1840s to 1854. Northern Democrats opposed banks, criticized corporate practices, and preached the ideals of a free society. They called for rapid territorial expansion of the United States, saying that in territorial expansion lay a means for thwarting the pretensions of the [[Slave Power]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Franklin Pierce]] of New Hampshire was elected president in 1852, followed by [[James Buchanan]] of Pennsylvania in 1856. They proved poor presidents who lost control of the slavery issue, and the party, as the nation broke apart and fought the [[American Civil War]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Third Party System: Civil War, Gilded Age: 1854-1896==&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Third Party System]] (1854-1896) the Democrats became the minority in the face of the newly formed Republican Party, which controlled nearly all northern states by 1860, bringing a solid majority in the Electoral College.  A powerful Republican issue was the allegation that northern Democrats, including &amp;quot;Doughfaces&amp;quot; like Pierce and Buchanan, and advocates of popular sovereignty like [[Stephen A. Douglas]] and [[Lewis Cass]], were accomplices to the [[Slave Power]]. The Republicans meant by Slave Power the conspiracy of slaveholders to seize control of the federal government and block the progress of liberty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DEM1860.JPG|200px|thumb|left|To vote for Douglas in Virginia, a man had to deposit the ticket in the official ballot box.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1860 the Democrats were unable to stop the election of Republican [[Abraham Lincoln]], even as they feared his election would lead to civil war.  The party split in two.  The northern wing nominated Douglas, and the southern wing nominated Vice President [[John C. Breckinridge]]. Douglas campaigned across the country and came in second in the popular vote, but carried only Missouri. Breckinridge carried 11 slave states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican Party was beginning a 50-year era of dominance (1858-1910). During the war, Northern Democrats divided into two factions, [[War Democrats]], who supported the military policies of President Lincoln, and [[Copperheads]], who strongly opposed them. Historian Kenneth Stampp has captured the Copperhead spirit in his depiction of Democratic Congressman [[Daniel W. Voorhees]] of Indiana: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;There was an earthy quality in Voorhees, &amp;quot;the tall sycamore of the Wabash.&amp;quot; On the stump his hot temper, passionate partisanship, and stirring eloquence made an irresistible appeal to the western Democracy. His bitter cries against protective tariffs and national banks, his intense race prejudice, his suspicion of the eastern Yankee, his devotion to personal liberty, his defense of the Constitution and state rights faithfully reflected the views of his constituents. Like other Jacksonian agrarians he resented the political and economic revolution then in progress. Voorhees idealized a way of life which he thought was being destroyed by the current rulers of his country. His bold protests against these dangerous trends made him the idol of the Democracy of the Wabash Valley.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stampp, 211.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats lost consecutive presidential elections from 1860 through 1880 (but 1876 was in dispute); 1884 was their next victory. The Democrats were weakened by their record of opposition to the Civil War but nevertheless benefited from white Southerners' resentment of Reconstruction and consequent hostility to the Republican Party. The [[Redeemers]] gave the Democrats control of every Southern state; the disenfranchisement of black voters in most of the South took place 1890-1900. From 1880 to 1960 the &amp;quot;[[Solid South]]&amp;quot; voted Democratic in all presidential elections (except 1928). After 1900 the key election in southern states was the Democratic primary; victory in the that primary was &amp;quot;tantamount to election&amp;quot; because the GOP was so weak.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though Republicans continued to control the White House until 1912 (except 1884 and 1892), the Democrats remained competitive in the states, especially in the mid-Atlantic and lower Midwest, and controlled the House of Representatives for most of that period. In the election of 1884, [[Grover Cleveland]], the conservative Democratic Governor of New York, won the presidency, a feat he repeated in 1892, having lost in the election of 1888.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:1893cleveland-typewriter.jpg|thumb|350px|Typewriters were new in 1893 and this Gillam cartoon from ''Puck'' shows that Cleveland can't get the Democratic &amp;quot;machine&amp;quot; to work as the keys (key politicians) won't respond to his efforts.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cleveland was the leader of the [[Bourbon Democrats]], the conservative wing of the party.  They represented business interests, supported banking and railroad goals, promoted capitalism, opposed imperialism and U.S. verseas expansion, opposed the annexation of [[Hawaii]], fought for the [[gold standard]], and opposed [[Bimetallism]].  They strongly supported reform movements such as [[Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act|Civil Service Reform]] and opposed corruption of city bosses, leading the fight against the [[Tweed Ring]].  The leading Bourbons included [[Samuel J. Tilden]], [[David Bennett Hill]] and [[William C. Whitney]] of New York, [[Arthur Pue Gorman]] of Maryland, [[Thomas F. Bayard]] of Delaware, [[William L. Wilson]] of West Virginia, [[John Griffin Carlisle]] of Kentucky, [[William F. Vilas]] of Wisconsin, [[J. Sterling Morton]] of Nebraska, [[John M. Palmer]] of Illinois, [[Horace Boies]] of Iowa, [[L.Q.C. Lamar]] of Mississippi, and railroad builder [[James J. Hill]] of Minnesota. A prominent intellectual was [[Woodrow Wilson]]. The Bourbons were in power when the [[Panic of 1893]] hit; it was a deep depression and they took the blame.  A fierce struggle inside the party ensued, with catastrophic losses for both the Bourbon and agrarian factions in 1894, leading to the showdown in 1896.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dead-dem1880.jpg|thumb|550px|In 1880 when General Hancock (right) became the presidential nominee of the Democrats, Republican cartoonists showed the Democratic party history as a horror chamber featuring atrocities in the Civil War era; the donkey&amp;quot; shows the party as a coalition of the rear end of the South joned to the rear end of the North]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnocultural voting: pietistic Republicans versus liturgical Democrats===&lt;br /&gt;
Religious lines were sharply drawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kleppner (1979).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Methodists, Congregationalists, Presbyterians, Scandinavian Lutherans and other pietists and evangelicals in the North were tightly linked to the Republican Party. In sharp contrast, liturgical groups, especially the Catholics, Episcopalians, and German Lutherans, looked to the Democratic Party for protection from pietistic moralism, especially prohibition.  Both parties cut across the class structure, with the Democrats more bottom-heavy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cultural issues, especially prohibition and foreign language schools became important because of the sharp religious divisions in the electorate. In the North, about 50% of the voters were pietistic or evangelical Protestants who believed the government should be used to reduce social sins, such as drinking. Liturgical churches (Roman Catholics, German Lutherans, Episcopalians) comprised over a quarter of the vote and wanted the government to stay out of the morality business. Prohibition debates and referenda heated up politics in most states over a period of decade, as national prohibition was finally passed in 1918 (and repealed in 1933), serving as a major issue in the North between the wet Democracy and the dry GOP.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In the South the Democrats were mostly on the dry side. Kleppner (1979).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Bryan Movement==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mark Hanna 1896 election.jpg|thumb|290px|right|Democratic attack ad in 1896 against GOP National Chairman [[Mark Hanna]]; cartoon by Davenport depicts Hanna as a slave driver; from Hearst's ''New York Journal'']] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Grover Cleveland]] led the conservative, pro-business [[Bourbon Democrat]]s but as the [[Panic of 1893|depression of 1893]] deepened his enemies multiplied. The Panic of 1893 started in February 1893, a full month before Cleveland became president. Convinced that the [[Sherman Silver Purchase Act]], passed under the administration of [[Benjamin Harrison]], was largely responsible for the alarming drain on federal gold, President Cleveland called Congress into special session to urge its repeal. Congress consented, but only after bitter debate that divided the Democratic party into two hostile camps-the eastern &amp;quot;goldbugs&amp;quot; and the silver wing of the West and South that was to propel young [[William Jennings Bryan]] to the fore in 1896.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;William DeGregorio, ''The Complete Book of U.S. Presidents'', Gramercy 1997&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the 1896 convention the silverite-agrarian faction repudiated the president, and nominated the crusading orator [[William Jennings Bryan]] on a platform of inflation through &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; silver. The idea was that minting huge numbers of silver dollars would flood the economy with cash and end the depression.  Eastern Democrats, unable to accept the party's free-silver platform and unwilling to support McKinley for his tariff views, nominated their own candidate, John M. Palmer of Illinois and called themselves the National, or Gold, Democrats.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;William DeGregorio, ''The Complete Book of U.S. Presidents'', Gramercy 1997&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[Gold Democrats]] attracted politicians and intellectuals (including [[Woodrow Wilson]] and [[Frederick Jackson Turner]]) who refused to vote Republican. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bryan, an overnight sensation because of his phenomenal &amp;quot;Cross of Gold&amp;quot; speech, crusaded against the gold standard.  Crisscrossing the Midwest and East by special train, he gave over 500 speeches to audiences in the millions.  In St. Louis he gave 36 speeches to workingmen's audiences all over the city, all in one day.  Most Democratic newspapers were hostile (except [[William Randolph Hearst]]'s ''New York Journal'') but Bryan seized control of the media by making the news every day, as he hurled thunderbolts against Eastern monied interests. The rural folk in South and Midwest were ecstatic, showing an enthusiasm never before seen.  Ethnic Democrats, especially Germans, however, were alarmed and frightened by Bryan. The middle classes, businessmen, newspaper editors, factory workers, railroad workers, and prosperous farmers generally rejected Bryan's crusade. Bryan was overwhelmed by [[William McKinley]] in the most exciting race in national history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Refuting Bryan's charges, historians have discovered there was little coercion of workers.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; McKinley promised a return to prosperity based on the gold standard, support for industry, railroads and banks, and pluralism that would enable every group to move ahead. Bryan did however, win the hearts and minds of a majority of Democrats. The election of 1896 was a political realignment. The victory of the Republican Party marked the start of the &amp;quot;Progressive Era,&amp;quot; from 1896 to 1932, in which the GOP usually was dominant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fourth Party System: Bryan, Wilson, Progressivism: 1896-1932 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Fourth Party System]] began with the 1896 election, a realignment during which the GOP controlled the presidency for 28 of 36 years. The GOP dominated most of the Northeast and Midwest, and half the West.  Bryan, with a base in the South and Plains states, was strong enough to get the nomination in 1900 (losing to McKinley) and 1908 (losing to Taft).  [[Theodore Roosevelt]] dominated the first decade of the century—and to the annoyance of Democrats &amp;quot;stole&amp;quot; the trust issue by crusading against trusts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Steal~trust.JPG|thumb|250px|[[Theodore Roosevelt]] steals the anti-trust issue from the Democrats, 1904]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Anti-Bryan conservatives controlled the convention in 1904, but they faced a [[Theodore Roosevelt]] landslide.  Bryan dropped his free silver and anti-imperialism rhetoric and supported mainstream progressive issues, such as the income tax, anti-trust, and direct election of Senators. He backed [[Woodrow Wilson]] in 1912, was rewarded with the State Department, then resigned in protest against Wilson's non-pacifistic policies in 1916. Northern Democrats were progressive on most issues, but generally opposed prohibition, were lukewarm regarding woman's suffrage, and were reluctant to undercut the &amp;quot;boss system&amp;quot; in the big cities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taking advantage of a deep split in the GOP, the Democrats took control of the House in 1910, and elected the intellectual reformer [[Woodrow Wilson]] in 1912 and 1916.  Wilson successfully led Congress to a series of Progressive laws, including a reduced tariff, stronger antitrust laws, the [[Federal Reserve System]], hours-and-pay benefits for railroad workers, and outlawing of child labor (which was reversed by the Supreme Court). Furthermore, constitutional amendments for prohibition and woman suffrage were passed in his second term.  In effect, Wilson laid to rest the issues of tariffs, money and antitrust that had dominated politics for 40 years.  Wilson led the U.S. to victory in the World War, and turned his attention to foreign affairs. He wrote parts of the [[Versailles Treaty]], especially the new [[League of Nations]]. But in 1919 Wilson's political skills faltered, and suddenly everything turned sour.  The Senate rejected Versailles and the League, a nationwide wave of strikes and violence caused unrest, and Wilson's health collapsed.  The GOP came roaring back in a landslide in 1920, as [[Warren G. Harding]] defeated a Democratic ticket memorable for having [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] as the vice presidential nominee. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:D-Edge-Congress.JPG|thumb|300px|Before 1932 Republicans usually controlled Congress; after 1932 the Democrats usually were in control]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 1924 Democratic National Convention, the big fight was over a resolution denouncing by name the [[Ku Klux Klan]]; it was pushed by New York governor [[Al Smith]] and Alabama Senator [[Oscar W. Underwood]] in order to embarrass the front-runner, [[William McAdoo]] of California. After furious debate, the resolution failed by just a single vote. The KKK faded away soon after, but the deep split in the party over cultural issues, especially Prohibition, facilitated Republican landslides in 1920, 1924 and 1928.  However [[Al Smith]] did build a strong Catholic base in the big cities in 1928, and [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]]'s election as Governor of New York that year brought a new leader to center stage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fifth Party System: The New Deal ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:509px-FDR in 1933.jpg|thumb|left|180px|President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] (1933-1945)]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Wall Street Crash 1929|stock market crash of 1929]] and the ensuing [[Great Depression]] set the stage for a more progressive government and [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] won a [[landslide victory]] in the [[U.S. presidential election, 1932|election of 1932]], campaigning on a platform of &amp;quot;Relief, Recovery, and Reform.&amp;quot; This came to be termed &amp;quot;[[New Deal|The New Deal]]&amp;quot; after a phrase in his acceptance speech. The Democrats also swept to large majorities in both houses of Congress, and among state Governors. Roosevelt altered the nature of the Party, away from laissez-faire capitalism, and towards an ideology of economic regulation and insurance against hardship.  Conservative Democrats were outraged; led by [[Al Smith]] they formed the [[American Liberty League]] in 1934 and counterattacked. They failed and either retired from politics or joined the GOP.  A few of them, such as [[Dean Acheson]] found their way back to the Democratic Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After making gains in Congress in 1934 Roosevelt moved left and embarked on an ambitious legislative program called &amp;quot;The Second New Deal.&amp;quot;  It was characterized by building up labor unions, nationalizing welfare by the [[WPA]] (which 2 million employed unemployed men), setting up [[Social Security]] and raising taxes on business profits.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; In general the New Deal, 1933-40, did not raise taxes, except for the Social Security tax that went into effect in 1937.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt's [[New Deal]] programs focused on job creation through public works projects as well as Social Security. In the name of &amp;quot;reform&amp;quot; it imposed strong regulations on the banking and financial system, transportation, communications, stock markets and labor-management relations.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt successfully built up the &amp;quot;[[New Deal Coalition]]&amp;quot;, a powerful coalition of voters and interest groups that supported liberalism. Key components included big city machines and labor unions. Key voter groups included traditional Democrats, white Southerners, Catholics, Jews, and liberals, as well as many blacks. This united voter base allowed Democrats to be elected to Congress and the presidency for much of the next 30 years.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
After a sweeping landslide reelection in 1936--losing only Maine and Vermont--Roosevelt stunned the nation, and his party, by calling for legislation to enlarge the Supreme Court by five new members. A firestorm of opposition erupted, led by his own vice president [[John Nance Garner]]. Roosevelt was defeated by an alliance of Republicans and conservative Democrats, who formed a [[Conservative coalition]] that managed to block nearly all liberal legislation. (Only a minimum wage law got through.) Angry with the conservative wing of his own party, Roosevelt tried to destroy it. In 1938, he actively campaigned against five incumbent conservative Democratic senators; all five senators won re-election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under FDR, the Democratic Party became identified closely with modern liberalism, which included the promotion of social welfare, unions and regulation of the economy. Civil rights were not on the party agenda at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Truman to Kennedy: 1945-1963==&lt;br /&gt;
Harry Truman took over unexpectedly in 1945, and the rifts inside the party that Roosevelt had papered over began to emerge. Former Vice President [[Henry A. Wallace]] denounced Truman as a war-monger for his anti-Soviet programs, the [[Truman Doctrine]], [[Marshall Plan]], and [[NATO]].   By cooperating with internationalist Republicans, Truman succeeded in defeating isolationists on the right and pro-Soviets on the left to establish a [[Cold War]] program that lasted until the fall of Communism in 1991. Wallace supporters and fellow travelers of the far left were pushed out of the party and the CIO in 1946-48 by young anti-Communists like [[Hubert Humphrey]], [[Walter Reuther]], and [[Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.]]. [[Hollywood]] emerged in the 1940s as an importance new base in the party, led by movie-star politicians such as [[Ronald Reagan]], who at this point in time strongly supported Roosevelt and Truman.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Reagan became a conservative around 1960, saying the Democratic party had left him.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the right the Republicans blasted Truman’s domestic policies. &amp;quot;Had Enough?&amp;quot; was the winning slogan as Republicans recaptured Congress in 1946.  Many party leaders were ready to dump Truman, but they lacked an alternative. Truman counterattacked, pushing [[J. Strom Thurmond]] and his [[Dixiecrats]] out, and taking advantage of the splits inside the GOP.  He was reelected in a stunning surprise.  However all of Truman’s Fair Deal proposals, such as universal health care were defeated by the [[Conservative Coalition]] in Congress.  His seizure of the steel industry was reversed by the Supreme Court.  &lt;br /&gt;
In foreign policy, Europe was safe but troubles mounted in Asia.  China fell to the Communists in 1949. Truman entered the [[Korean War]] without formal Congressional approval—the last time a president would ever do so. When the war turned to a stalemate in 1951 he fired General [[Douglas MacArthur]], a hero to conservatives. Republicans blasted Truman's failure to stop Communist gains in Asia. A series of petty scandals among friends and buddies of Truman further tarnished his image, allowing [[Dwight Eisenhower]] and the Republicans in 1952 to crusade against &amp;quot;Korea, Communism and Corruption.&amp;quot; Truman dropped out of the presidential race early in 1952, leaving no obvious successor. The convention nominated [[Adlai Stevenson]] in 1952 and 1956, only to see him overwhelmed by two Eisenhower landslides.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:1952-32.jpg|thumb|480px|right|Stevenson and labor unions warn against a return of the Republican policies of Herbert Hoover in 1952 campaign poster]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Congress the powerful duo of House Speaker [[Sam Rayburn]] and Senate Majority leader [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] held the party together, often by compromising with Eisenhower. In 1958 the party made dramatic gains in the midterms and seemed to have a permanent lock on Congress. Indeed, Democrats had majorities in the House every election from 1930 to 1992 (except 1946 and 1952). Most southern Congressmen were conservative Democrats, however, and they usually worked with conservative Republicans. The result was a [[Conservative Coalition]] that blocked practically all liberal domestic legislation from 1937 to the 1970s, except for a brief spell 1964-65, when Johnson neutralized its power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nomination of [[John F. Kennedy]] in 1960 energized the Catholic population, which jammed motorcades and turned out in heavy numbers (over 80% voted for Kennedy), while also causing a backlash among white Protestants (over 70% of whom voted for Republican candidate [[Richard Nixon]].  Reaching beyond the traditional Irish, German, Italian and Polish Catholic ethnics, Viva Kennedy set out to mobilize the previously passive Latino vote, and it perhaps provided the margin of victory for Kennedy in Texas and New Mexico.  Kennedy's victory reinvigorated the party. His youth, vigor and intelligence caught the popular imagination. In foreign policy he was strongly anti-Communist, and promptly launched an invasion of casto's Cuba; it failed badly. A few new programs like the Peace Corps harnessed idealism.  In terms of legislation, Kennedy was stalemated by the [[Conservative Coalition]], and anyway his proposals were all cautious and incremental.  In three years he was unable to pass any significant new legislation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kennedy's election did mark the coming of age of the Catholic component of the New Deal Coalition.  After 1964 middle class Catholics started voting Republicans in the same proportion as their Protestant neighbors.  Except for the Chicago of [[Richard J. Daley]], the last of the Democratic machines faded away.  His involvement in Vietnam proved momentous, for his successor Lyndon Johnson decided to stay, and double the investment, and double the bet again and again until over 500,000 American soldiers were fighting in that small country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Civil Rights, Riots, War and collapse of the New Deal Coalition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:LBJ-64.jpg|280px|left|thumb|President Lyndon Johnson ran for reelection in the shadow of Kennedy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal Coalition began to fracture as union and religious leaders demanded support for [[civil rights]], upsetting the party's traditional base of conservative Southern Democrats. After Harry Truman's platform showed support for civil rights and anti-segregation policies during the 1948 Democratic National Convention, many Southern Democratic delegates decided to split from the Party and formed the &amp;quot;[[Dixiecrats]],&amp;quot; led by [[South Carolina]] governor [[Strom Thurmond]] (who, as a Senator, would later join the Republican Party). Over the next few years, many conservative Democrats in the &amp;quot;[[Solid South]]&amp;quot; drifted away from the party. By 1940 most northern Blacks had shifted to the Democratic Party due to its New Deal relief programs and support for civil rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The party's dramatic reversal on civil rights issues culminated when Democratic President [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] signed into law the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]]. The new laws ended segregation and also ended the main argument Democrats had used to block Republican gains in the South (that is, only the Democrats could protect segregation). The South became competitive in presidential politics in the 1970s and 1980s, giving strong support to Republican Ronald Reagan and rejecting the liberal northern candidates. The Democrats responded by nominating Southerners (Carter in 1976 and 1980, Clinton in 1992 and 1996, Gore in 2000). Few southern states were won by Democratic presidential candidates from the North (Humphrey in 1968, McGovern in 1972, Mondale in 1984, Dukakis in 1988, Kerry in 2004).  At the state and local level the Republicans made slow, steady gains, especially among upscale middle class whites and migrants from the North. By the 1990s the GOP was competitive at the state and local level throughout the South. The Democrats made gains in the west, converting California to a Democratic stronghold and gaining in fast-growing Arizona and Nevada. The Northeast became more and more a Democratic enclave, especially after 2006 when numerous Republican moderates were defeated for reelection.  the Midwest remained a battleground.  The Democrats made strong gains in Illinois, but slipped a little in Minnesota.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Demfight1968.jpg|thumb|290px|By 1968 Democrats were bitterly fighting over Vietnam and the failures of the Great Society]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1968 to 1999==&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party split five ways in 1968 and became the minority party in presidential elections for decades; after 1964 they won a majority of the presidential vote only in 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Carter.jpg|thumb|right|180px|Jimmy Carter was elected in 1976 and defeated in 1980.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1972, the Democrats nominated Sen. [[George McGovern]] (SD) as the presidential candidate on a platform which advocated, among other things, U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam and a guaranteed minimum income for all Americans. McGovern's forces at the national convention ousted Mayor [[Richard J. Daley]] and the entire Chicago delegation, replacing them with insurgents led by [[Jesse Jackson]]. After it became know that McGovern's running mate, [[Thomas Eagleton]], had received electric shock therapy, McGovern said he supported Eagleton &amp;quot;1000%&amp;quot; but he was soon forced to drop him and find a new running mate.  With his campaign stalled for several weeks McGovern finally selected [[Sargent Shriver]], a Kennedy-in-law who was close to Mayor Daley.  On July 14, 1972, McGovern appointed his campaign manager, Jean Westwood as the first woman chair of the Democratic National Committee.  McGovern was defeated in a landslide by incumbent [[Richard Nixon]], winning only Massachusetts and Washington, D.C.  The [[Watergate affair]] of 1973-74 made corruption a central issue, especially after [[Gerald Ford]] pardoned Nixon in September 1974. The Democrats made major gains in the 1974 off-year elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1976, mistrust of the administration, complicated by a combination of economic recession and inflation, sometimes called ''[[stagflation]]'', led to Ford's narrow defeat in 1976 by [[Jimmy Carter]], a former governor of Georgia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carter represented the total outsider, who promised honesty in government. He had served as a naval officer, a farmer, a state senator, and a one-term governor. His only experience with federal politics was when he chaired the Democratic National Committee's congressional and gubernatorial elections in 1974. Some of Carter's major accomplishments consisted of the creation of a national energy policy and the consolidation of governmental agencies, resulting in two new cabinet departments, the [[United States Department of Energy]] and the [[United States Department of Education]]. Carter also successfully deregulated the trucking, airline, rail, finance, communications, and oil industries, bolstered the [[social security]] system, and appointed record numbers of women and minorities to significant government and judicial posts. He also enacted strong legislation on environmental protection, through the expansion of the [[National Park Service]] in [[Alaska]], creating 103 million new acres of land. In foreign affairs, Carter's accomplishments consisted of the [[Camp David Accords]], the [[Panama Canal Treaties]], the creation of full diplomatic relations with the [[People's Republic of China]], and the negotiation of the [[SALT II]] Treaty. In addition, he championed human rights throughout the world and used human rights as the center of his administration's foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even with all of these successes, Carter failed to implement a national health plan or to reform the tax system, as he had promised in his campaign. Inflation was also on the rise. Abroad, the Iranians held 52 Americans hostage for 444 days, and Carter's diplomatic and military rescue attempts failed. The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan later that year weakened the perception Americans had of Carter. Even though he had already been defeated for re-election, Carter fortunately was able to negotiate the release of every American hostage. They were lifted out of Iran minutes after Reagan was inaugurated and Carter served as Reagan's emissary to greet them when they arrived in Germany. In 1980, Carter defeated liberal champion [[Edward Kennedy]] to gain renomination, but lost to conservative [[Ronald Reagan]] by a landslide. The Democrats lost 12 Senate seats, and for the first time since 1954, the Republicans controlled the Senate.  The House, however, remained in Democratic hands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===1980s: Battling Reaganism===&lt;br /&gt;
Instrumental in the election of Republican [[Ronald Reagan]] in 1980, were Democrats who supported many conservative policies. Among legislators, one of the most prominent of these consevative Democrats was Georgia congressman and second chairman of the [[John Birch Society]], [[Larry McDonald]], who was a passenger on [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] shot down by the Soviets near [[Moneron Island]] on Sept. 1, 1983. The &amp;quot;Reagan Democrats&amp;quot;  were Democrats before the Reagan years, and afterward, but they voted for [[Ronald Reagan]] in 1980 and 1984 (and for [[George H. W. Bush]] in 1988), producing their landslide victories. They were mostly white ethnics in the Northeast who were attracted to Reagan's social conservatism on issues such as abortion, and to his strong foreign policy. They did not continue to vote Republican in 1992 or 1996, so the term fell into disuse except as a reference to the 1980s. The term is not used to describe southern whites who became permanent Republicans in presidential elections.   Stanley Greenberg, a Democratic pollster analyzed white ethnic voters, largely unionized  auto workers, in suburban Macomb County, Michigan, just north of Detroit. The county voted 63 percent for Kennedy in 1960 and 66 percent for Reagan in 1984.  He concluded that Reagan Democrats no longer saw Democrats as champions of their  middle class aspirations, but instead saw it as being a party working primarily for the benefit of others, especially African Americans and the very poor.  Bill Clinton targeted the Reagan Democrats with considerable success in 1992 and 1996. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Liberal1984.jpg|thumb|350px]] The failure to hold the Reagan Democrats and the white South led to the final collapse of the [[New Deal coalition]]. Reagan carried 49 states against former Vice President and Minnesota Senator [[Walter Mondale]], a New Deal stalwart, in 1984.  Massachusetts Governor [[Michael Dukakis]], running not as a New Dealer but as an efficiency expert in public administration, lost by a landslide in 1988 to Vice President [[George H. W. Bush]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to these landslide defeats, the [[Democratic Leadership Council]] was created. It worked to move the Party rightwards to the ideological center in order to recover some of the fundraising that had been lost to the Republicans due to corporate donors supporting Reagan. With the Party retaining left-of-center supporters as well as supporters holding moderate or conservative views on some issues, the Democrats became generally a &amp;quot;big tent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;catch all party&amp;quot; with widespread appeal to most opponents of the Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The South Becomes Republican===&lt;br /&gt;
In the century after the end of [[Reconstruction]] in 1877, the white South identified with Democratic Party. The Democrats' lock on power was so strong, the region was called the [[Solid South]]. The Republicans only controlled parts of the Appalachian mountains, but they sometimes did compete for statewide office in the border states. Before 1964, the southern Democrats saw their party as the defender of the southern way of life, which included a respect for states' rights and an appreciation for traditional southern values. They repeatedly warned against the aggressive designs of Northern liberals and Republicans, as well as civil rights activists whom they denounced as &amp;quot;outside agitators.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, between 1964 and 2004, the Democratic Party's lock on the South was broken. The long-term cause had to do with the South becoming more like the rest of the nation. It could not long stand apart in terms of racial segregation.  Modernization had brought factories, national businesses, and larger, more cosmopolitan cities to the South, as well as millions of migrants from the North and more opportunities for higher education. Meanwhile, the cotton and tobacco economy of the traditional rural South faded away, as former farmers commuted to factory jobs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integration and the civil rights movement caused enormous controversy in the white South, with many attacking it as a violation of states' rights.  When segregation was outlawed by court order and by the Civil Rights acts of 1964 and 1965, a die-hard element resisted integration, led by Democratic governors  [[Orval Faubus]] of Arkansas, [[Lester Maddox]] of Georgia, and, especially [[George Wallace]] of Alabama. These populist governors appealed to a less-educated, blue-collar electorate that on economic grounds favored the Democratic Party, but opposed desegregation. After 1965 most Southerners accepted integration (with the exception of public schools). Believing themselves betrayed by the Democratic Party, traditional white southerners joined the new middle-class and the Northern transplants in moving toward the Republican Party. Meanwhile, newly enfranchised Black voters began supporting Democratic candidates at the 80-90-percent levels, producing Democratic leaders such as [[Julian Bond]] and [[John Lewis]] of Georgia, and [[Barbara Jordan]] of Texas. Just as Martin Luther King had promised, integration had brought about a new day in Southern politics, freeing both blacks and whites from old hatreds and fears. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using issues of cultural conservatism, especially opposition to abortion and homosexuality and support for school prayer, Republicans attracted strong majorities among evangelical Christians. They were nationwide, but strongest in the South; before to the 1980s they were largely apolitical.  Exit polls in 2004  showed that Bush led Kerry by 70-30% among Southern whites, who comprised 71% of the voters.  Kerry had a 90-9 lead among the 18% of Southern voters who were black. One third of the Southern voters said they were white evangelicals; they voted for Bush by 80-20.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See the exit polls at [http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.3.html |date=[[2004-11-02]]|accessdate=2006-11-18]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===1990s===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s the Democratic Party revived itself, in part by moving to the right on economic and social policy. President [[Bill Clinton]], who defeated the incumbent [[George H. W. Bush]] in 1992, implemented a balanced federal budget and [[welfare reform]] (cutting benefits and requiring many recipients to take jobs), traditionally conservative causes. Labor unions, which had been steadily losing membership since the 1960s, found they had also lost political clout inside the Democratic Party: Clinton enacted the [[NAFTA]] free trade agreement with Canada and Mexico over the strong objection of these labor unions, much to the disappointment of those on the left of the party. The [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] took control of both the House of Representatives and the United States Senate after the 1994 election. Clinton was impeached in 1998 and subsequently acquitted in 1999.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the [[DLC]] attempted to move the Democratic agenda in favor of more centrist positions, prominent Democrats from both the centrist and conservative factions assumed leadership of the party and its direction. Some liberals and progressives felt alienated by the Democratic Party, which they felt had become unconcerned with the interests of the common people and left-wing issues in general. Some Democrats challenged the validity of such critiques, citing the Democratic role in pushing for progressive reforms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==21st century==&lt;br /&gt;
===Election of 2000===&lt;br /&gt;
During the presidential election of 2000, the Democrats chose Vice President [[Al Gore]] to be the party's candidate for the presidency. Gore and [[George W. Bush]], the Republican candidate and son of former President George H.W. Bush, disagreed on a number of issues, including abortion, gun control, environmentalism, gay rights, tax cuts, foreign policy, public education, global warming, judicial appointments, and affirmative action. Nevertheless, Gore's affiliation with Clinton and the DLC caused critics—Green Party presidential candidate [[Ralph Nader]] in particular—to assert that Bush and Gore were too similar, especially on free trade, reductions in social welfare, and the death penalty. &amp;quot;We want to punish the Democrats, we want to hurt them, wound them,&amp;quot; Nader's closest advisor said.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Harry G. Levinem &amp;quot;Ralph Nader, Suicide Bomber.&amp;quot; ''The Village Voice'' May 3, 2004 at [http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0418,levine,53179,1.html] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gore won a popular plurality of over 500,000 votes over Bush, but lost in the electoral vote by four votes. In a close election anything can be decisive, but many angry Democrats blamed Nader's third-party spoiler role for Gore's defeat. Controversy plagued the election, and Gore largely dropped from politics for years; by 2005 however he was making speeches critical of Bush's foreign and environmental policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite Gore's close defeat, the Democrats gained five seats in the Senate (including the election of [[Hillary Clinton]] in New York), to turn a 55-45 Republican edge into a 50-50 split (with a Republican Vice President breaking a tie). However, when Republican Senator [[Jim Jeffords]] of Vermont decided in 2001 to become an independent and caucus with the Democrats, the majority status shifted along with the seat, including control of the floor (by the Majority Leader) and control of all committee chairmanships. However, the Republicans regained their Senate majority with gains in 2002 and 2004, leaving the Democrats with only 44 seats, the fewest since the 1920s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2001-2003===&lt;br /&gt;
In the aftermath of the [[9-11 Attacks]], the nation's focus was changed to issues of national security. All but one Democrat&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Representative [[Barbara Lee]] of Texas&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; joined the Republicans to authorize President Bush to invade invasion of Afghanistan and overthrow the Taliban. House leader [[Richard Gephardt]] and Senate leader [[Thomas Daschle]] pushed Democrats to vote for the [[USA PATRIOT Act]] and the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The Democrats were split over entering Iraq in 2003 and increasingly expressed concerns about both the justification and progress of the [[War on Terrorism]], as well as the domestic effects, including supposed threats to civil rights and civil liberties from the PATRIOT Act. Senator [[Russ Feingold]] was the only Senator to vote against the act; it received more resistance when it came up for renewal, but was renewed in 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the wake of the financial fraud scandal of the [[Enron Corporation]] and other corporations, Congressional Democrats pushed for a legal overhaul of business accounting with the intention of preventing further accounting fraud. This led to the bipartisan [[Sarbanes-Oxley Act]] in 2002. Economic issues did not work well in 2002, as the Democrats lost a few seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. They lost three seats in the Senate. While Democrats gained governorships in New Mexico (where [[Bill Richardson]] was elected), Arizona ([[Janet Napolitano]]) and Wyoming ([[Dave Freudenthal]]), other Democrats lost governorships in South Carolina ([[Jim Hodges]]), Alabama ([[Don Siegelman]]) and, for the first time in more than a century, Georgia ([[Roy Barnes]]). The election led to another round of soul searching about the party's narrowing base. The party's miseries mounted in 2003, when a voter recall unseated their unpopular governor of California, [[Gray Davis]], and replaced him which a charismatic liberal Republican [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]. By the end of 2003 the four largest states had Republican governors: California, Texas, New York and Florida.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Election of 2004===&lt;br /&gt;
The 2004 campaign began in late 2002, when Gore said he would not run again. [[Howard Dean]], former Governor of Vermont, an opponent of the war and a critic of the Democratic establishment, was the front-runner leading into the Democratic primaries. Dean had immense grassroots support, especially from the left wing of the party. Massachusetts Senator [[John Kerry]], a more centrist figure with heavy support from the [[Democratic Leadership Council]], was nominated because he was seen as more &amp;quot;electable&amp;quot; than Dean. Democrats moved to populist anti-business positions that denounced free trade and the [[NAFTA]] agreement. The party rhetoric attacked the Bush administration rather than propose alternative programs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end, Kerry lost both the popular vote (by 3 million out of over 120 million votes cast) and the [[Electoral College]]. Republicans also gained four seats in the Senate and three seats in the House of Representatives, and for the first time since 1952, the Democratic leader of the Senate lost re-election. In the end, there were 3,660 Democratic state legislators across the nation to the Republicans' 3,557. Democrats gained governorships in Louisiana, New Hampshire and Montana. However, they lost the governorship of Missouri and a legislative majority in Georgia, which had long been a Democratic stronghold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There were many reasons for the defeat. After the election most analysts concluded that Kerry was a poor campaigner.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Evan Thomas and Staff of Newsweek,''Election 2004: How Bush Won and What You Can Expect in the Future''(2005)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A group of Vietnam veterans opposed to Kerry called the &amp;quot;Swift Boat Veterans for Truth&amp;quot; undercut Kerry's use of his military past as a campaign strategy.  Kerry was unable to reconcile his initial support of the [[Iraq War]] with his opposition to the war in 2004, or manage the deep split in the Democratic Party between those who favored and opposed the war. Republicans ran thousands of television commercials to argue that Kerry had flip-flopped on Iraq.  When Kerry's home state of Massachusetts legalized same-sex marriage, the issue split liberal and conservative Democrats and independents (Kerry publicly stated throughout his campaign that he opposed same sex marriage, but favored civil unions).  Republicans exploited the same-sex marriage issue by promoting ballot initiatives in 11 states that brought conservatives to the polls in large numbers; all 11 initiatives passed. Some Democrats argued that flaws in vote-counting systems may also have played a role in Kerry's defeat in Ohio. Other factors include a healthy job market, a rising stock market, strong home sales, and low unemployment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the 2004 election, prominent Democrats began to rethink the party's direction, and a variety of strategies for moving forward were voiced. Some Democrats proposed moving towards the right; others demanded that the party move more to the left and become a stronger opposition party. . Rethinking the party's position on gun control became a matter of discussion, brought up by [[Howard Dean]], [[Bill Richardson]], [[Brian Schweitzer]] and other Democrats who had won governorships in states where Second Amendment rights were important to many voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2005 - 2007===&lt;br /&gt;
These debates were reflected in the 2005 campaign for Chairman of the [[Democratic National Committee]], which [[Howard Dean]] won. He sought to move the Democratic strategy away from the establishment, and bolster support for the party's state organizations, even in Red states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the 109th Congress convened in 2005, [[Harry Reid]], the new Senate Minority Leader, tried to convince the Democratic Senators to vote more as a bloc on important issues; he forced the Republicans to abandon their push for privatization of Social Security. In 2005, the Democrats retained their governorships in Virginia and New Jersey, electing [[Tim Kaine]] and [[Jon Corzine]], respectively. However, the party lost the mayoral race in New York City, a Democratic stronghold, for the fourth straight time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006, with scandals involving Republican lobbyist [[Jack Abramoff]], as well as GOP House leader [[Tom DeLay]], Ohio GOP governor [[Bob Taft]] and others, the Democrats used the slogan &amp;quot;Culture of corruption.&amp;quot; Negative public opinion on the war in Iraq, along with widespread dissatisfaction among conservatives over government spending, dragged President Bush's job approval ratings down to the lowest levels of his presidency.  To win control the Democrats had to add 15 seats in the House (they added 30), and 6 in the Senate (they added 6). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party's electoral success has been attributed to running relatively conservative Democrats in close seats, such as the Senate races in Virginia, Pennsylvania and Montana. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Dewan Shaila and Anne E. Kornblut, &amp;quot;In Key House Races, Democrats Run to the Right,&amp;quot; ''New York Times,'' 2006-10-30; but compare Rick Perlstein, &amp;quot;Who deserves credit for the Democratic comeback?&amp;quot; ''The New Republic'' 2006-11-08]] at [https://ssl.tnr.com/p/docsub.mhtml?i=w061106&amp;amp;s=perlstein110806] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   Exit polling suggested that corruption was a key issue for many voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;CNN, &amp;quot;Corruption named as key issue by voters in exit polls,&amp;quot; 2006-11-08 at [http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/07/election.exitpolls/] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006 Democrats gained a majority of governorships and made gains in many state legislatures. No Democratic incumbent was defeated in any major race. &lt;br /&gt;
===2007-2010===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Obama_approval_index_december_22_2009.jpg‎|thumb|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
House Democrats chose Rep. [[Nancy Pelosi]] of California for Speaker, the first woman ever, but rejected her choice for Majority Leader. Senate Democrats promoted Harry Reid to Majority Leader.  Neither have been very effective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The presidential campaign of 2008 featured a remarkable duel between Obama--the first major black candidate, and [[Hillary Clinton]], the first major woman contender. Obama won with his charismatic oratory and his highly efficient fund-raising and strong organization in the caucus states, while Clinton went downscale to pick up big majorities among poor whites and Hispanics. The contest between Obama and GOP nominee [[John McCain]] was very close until September, when the collapse of the financial system soured the voters on the GOP. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Obama Administration]] got off to a fast start in 2009, especially in vigorous efforts to combat the [[Recession of 2008]] with heavy new stimulus spending, massive loans to banks, increased regulation, and deep intervention in the automobile industry.  All those policies were begun by Bush, and had failed to reverse the decline of the economy in late 2008.  Whether they will now succeed remains an open question, with the GOP now voting solidly against them and some conservatives like [[Rush Limbaugh]] hoping that the Democrats will fail badly and that the people will again turn to the Republican party.  The Democratic Party is feeling the sting from the opposition and many Democrats are beginning to question their own leadership.  Liberals are disenchanted with Obama's hawkish position on the [[Afghanistan War]]. The health care reform that consumed most of 2009 remains unsettled, as public opinion has turned against it. Environmentalists now seem resigned to the failure of a [[cap and trade]] program to reduce CO2 emissions.  Most of all the recession drags on.  The stimulus bill was passed quickly in Feb. 2009 over almost unanimous GOP opposition, but despite promises of &amp;quot;shovel ready&amp;quot; projects, most of the money has not been spent a year later and the economy remains in the doldrums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The elections in Nov. 2009 in New Jersey and Virginia went badly for the Democrats, as the GOP gained both governorships and many local races, not to mention the Democrats' fifth straight loss for the mayoralty of New York City.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
see [[2010 Midterm Elections]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symbols==&lt;br /&gt;
The most common symbol for the party is the donkey, although the party itself never officially adopted this symbol.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.democrats.org/a/2005/06/history_of_the.php History of the Democratic Donkey]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some historians suggest the jackass was born 1828 when Jackson was sometimes called a jackass by his opponents as a play on his name. A political cartoon depicting Jackson riding and directing a donkey (representing the Democratic Party) was published in 1837. A political cartoon by [[Thomas Nast]] in an 1870  revived the donkey as a symbol for the Democratic Party. Cartoonists ever since have followed Nast and used the donkey to represent the Democrats, and the elephant to represent the Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the early 20th century, the traditional symbol of the Democratic Party in many states was the rooster, as opposed to the Republican eagle. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no official color, but since election night 2000 blue has become the identification color of the Democratic Party for maps, while the red has become the color of the Republicans.  Increasingly blue is used by Democrats for promotions (e.g BuyBlue, BlueFund) and by the party itself, which in 2006 unveiled the &amp;quot;Red to Blue Program&amp;quot; to support Democratic candidates running against Republican incumbents in the 2006 midterm election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jefferson-Jackson Day]] annual fundraising celebrations are held by local chapters of the Democratic Party. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The song &amp;quot;[[Happy Days Are Here Again]]&amp;quot; is the unofficial song of the Democratic Party. It was used prominently when Roosevelt was nominated for president at the 1932 Democratic National Convention and remains a sentimental favorite for Democrats today. During the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton]] era, the [[Fleetwood Mac]] song &amp;quot;Don't Stop Thinking About Tomorrow&amp;quot; became a popular song at Democratic events, reflecting the growing prominence of Baby Boomers in the party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Democratic Presidents==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Andrew Jackson]] (1829-1837)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Martin Van Buren]] (1837-1841)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[James K. Polk]] (1845-1849)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franklin Pierce]] (1853-1857)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[James Buchanan]] (1857-1861)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Grover Cleveland]] (1885-1889) (1893-1897)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Woodrow Wilson]] (1913-1921)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franklin Roosevelt]] (1933-1945)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harry S Truman]] (1945-1953)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John F. Kennedy]] (1961-1963)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] (1963-1969)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jimmy Carter]] (1977-1981)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bill Clinton]] (1993-2001)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barack Obama]] (2009 - Present)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Democrats|Articles about '''Democrats''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gestapo care]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
===Current===&lt;br /&gt;
*Barone, Michael, and Grant Ujifusa, ''The Almanac of American Politics 2008: The Senators, the Representatives and the Governors: Their Records and Election Results, Their States and Districts'' (2007) covers all the live politicians with amazing detail. New edition every two years since 1975.&lt;br /&gt;
*  Brownstein, Ronald. ''The Second Civil War: How Extreme Partisanship Has Paralyzed Washington and Polarized America''(2007)  &lt;br /&gt;
* Crane, Michael. ''The Political Junkie Handbook: The Definitive Reference Books on Politics'' (2004) covers all the major issues explaining the parties' positions&lt;br /&gt;
*Sabato, Larry J. ''Divided States of America: The Slash and Burn Politics of the 2004 Presidential Election'' (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
*Sabato, Larry J. ed. ''The Sixth Year Itch: The Rise and Fall of the George W. Bush Presidency'' (1907), in-depth essays by scholars on key states in 2006&lt;br /&gt;
* Sabato, Larry J., and Howard R. Ernst  eds. ''Political Parties and Elections'' (2007), 540pp; an encyclopedia with 450 entries by scholars; focus is 1945 to present&lt;br /&gt;
* Sabato, Larry J. and Bruce Larson. ''The Party's Just Begun: Shaping Political Parties for America's Future'' (2001) textbook.&lt;br /&gt;
* Shafer, Byron E. and Anthony J. Badger, eds. ''Contesting Democracy: Substance and Structure in American Political History, 1775-2000'' (2001), long essays by specialists on each time period&lt;br /&gt;
* Shafer, Byron and Richard Johnston. ''The End of Southern Exceptionalism'' (2006), uses statistical election data &amp;amp; polls to argue  GOP growth was primarily a response to economic change&lt;br /&gt;
===Historical===&lt;br /&gt;
* ''American National Biography'' (20 volumes, 1999) covers all politicians no longer alive; online and paper copies at many academic libraries. &lt;br /&gt;
* Jensen, Richard. ''Grass Roots Politics: Parties, Issues, and Voters, 1854-1983'' (1983) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/grass-roots-politics-parties-issues-and-voters-1854-1983-by-christopher-c-gibbs-richard-j-jensen-steven-l-piott.jsp online edition]; survey by conservative scholar, with primary sources&lt;br /&gt;
* Kennedy, David M. ''Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929-1945'' (2001), synthesis by leading scholar; Pulitzer prize [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=52284041 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kleppner, Paul et al. ''The Evolution of American Electoral Systems'' (1983), essays by scholars (some of them conservatives), 1790s to 1980s.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kleppner, Paul. ''The Third Electoral System 1853-1892: Parties, Voters, and Political Cultures'' (1979), analysis of voting behavior, with emphasis on region, ethnicity, religion and class. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=24451028  online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ling, Peter J. ''The Democratic Party: A Photographic History'' (2003).&lt;br /&gt;
* Patterson, James T. ''Grand Expectations: The United States, 1945-1974'' (1997) synthesis by leading scholar. [http://www.amazon.com/Grand-Expectations-United-1945-1974-History/dp/0195117972/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1211911625&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Patterson, James T. ''Restless Giant: The United States from Watergate to Bush vs. Gore'' (2005) synthesis by leading scholar. [http://www.amazon.com/Restless-Giant-United-Watergate-History/dp/0195305221/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1211911625&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ritchie, Donald A. ''Electing FDR: The New Deal Campaign of 1932'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Electing-FDR-Campaign-Presidential-Elections/dp/0700615504/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1195784762&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rutland, Robert Allen. ''The Democrats: From Jefferson to Clinton'' (1995). &lt;br /&gt;
* Shafer, Byron E. and Anthony J. Badger, eds. ''Contesting Democracy: Substance and Structure in American Political History, 1775-2000'' (2001), most recent collection of new essays by specialists on each time period:  &lt;br /&gt;
**includes: &amp;quot;State Development in the Early Republic: 1775–1840&amp;quot; by Ronald P. Formisano; &amp;quot;The Nationalization and Racialization of American Politics: 1790–1840&amp;quot; by David Waldstreicher; &amp;quot;'To One or Another of These Parties Every Man Belongs;&amp;quot;: 1820–1865 by Joel H. Silbey; &amp;quot;Change and Continuity in the Party Period: 1835–1885&amp;quot; by Michael F. Holt; &amp;quot;The Transformation of American Politics: 1865–1910&amp;quot; by Peter H. Argersinger; &amp;quot;Democracy, Republicanism, and Efficiency: 1885–1930&amp;quot; by Richard Jensen; &amp;quot;The Limits of Federal Power and Social Policy: 1910–1955&amp;quot; by Anthony J. Badger; &amp;quot;The Rise of Rights and Rights Consciousness: 1930–1980&amp;quot; by James T. Patterson, Brown University; and &amp;quot;Economic Growth, Issue Evolution, and Divided Government: 1955–2000&amp;quot; by Byron E. Shafer&lt;br /&gt;
* Schlisinger, Galbraith. ''Of the People: The 200 Year History of the Democratic Party'' (1992)  &lt;br /&gt;
* Sundquist, James L. ''Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States'',  (1983) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=29223022   online edition&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilentz, Sean. ''The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln'' (2005), detailed synthesis by a leading liberal scholar. [http://www.amazon.com/Rise-American-Democracy-Jefferson-Lincoln/dp/0393058204/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1195784940&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Witcover, Jules. ''Party of the People: A History of the Democrats'' (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
* Schlesinger, Arthur Meier, Jr. ed. ''History of American Presidential Elections, 1789-2000'' (various multivolume editions, latest is 2001). For each election includes a short history by a leading scholar and a selection of primary documents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.democrats.org/ Democratic Party Official Site]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.demconvention.com/assets/downloads/2008-Democratic-Platform-final.pdf 2008 Democratic Platform (pdf download)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Political Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Political Parties]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Progressive Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gilded Age]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reagan Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1960s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Presidency]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Jacksonian Democracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:111th United States Congress]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Billy2</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=860271</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=860271"/>
		<updated>2011-04-06T00:48:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Billy2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Liberal Brain.jpg|thumb|470px|top|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;A [[satire|satirical]] conception of the liberal brain.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (also '''leftist''') is someone who rejects false biblical standards, rather accepting the ideas or concepts.  There are no coherent liberal standards; often a liberal is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;As one liberal website candidly observes, &amp;quot;Obama is a shallow narcissist, not a believer in any cause higher than himself. Every American president has had a healthy ego, but none has ever been as purely motivated by vanity as the childishly self-loving [[Barack Obama]].&amp;quot;[http://www.opednews.com/articles/Barack-Obama-s-ego-driven-by-Christopher-Calder-091210-804.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]] and, as in Europe, [[socialist]]ic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to current dictionaries and their own beliefs, a liberal is &amp;quot;a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=liberal&amp;amp;sub=Search+WordNet&amp;amp;o2=&amp;amp;o0=1&amp;amp;o7=&amp;amp;o5=&amp;amp;o1=1&amp;amp;o6=&amp;amp;o4=&amp;amp;o3=&amp;amp;h=00&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, or &amp;quot;open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  In practice, however, liberals are often the most intolerant of people, and frequently are on the side of disorder, chaos, anarchy, and lawbreaking.  According to Webster's Unabridged Dictionary - and matched by current observation - liberals are '''&amp;quot;unchecked by a sense of the decorous, the fitting, or the polite...lacking significant moral restraints&amp;quot;''' or '''&amp;quot;...an emancipation from convention, tradition, or dogma that extends from a belief in altering institutions to fit altering conditions to a preference for lawlessness&amp;quot;'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged'', Volume II; Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. Chicago, 1986. (pg. 1303, column 1)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and/or legalized [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Censorship]] of teacher-lead [[prayer]] in classrooms and school sponsored events&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of obscenity and pornography as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography. These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Income redistribution]], usually through progressive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-rationed medical care, such as [[Universal Health Care]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and government-controlled [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The denial of inherent [[gender differences]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting that men and women be placed in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tax and spend&lt;br /&gt;
* Trying to impede the freedoms of others&lt;br /&gt;
* Implementation of [[affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of [[labor union]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Teaching acceptance of promiscuity through sexual &amp;quot;education&amp;quot; rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it was intended&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Johnwaynegacyrosalynncarter.jpg|right|300px|thumbnail|[[Serial killer]] [[John Wayne Gacy]] was a [[Democratic Party]] activist who had his picture taken with First Lady [[Rosalynn Carter]] in 1978. In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, John Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]] and &amp;quot;very liberal&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s151/candypop_02/Serial%20Killers/John%20Wayne%20Gacy/?action=view&amp;amp;current=SERIAL_KILLER_John_Wayne_Gacy_In-1.mp4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Greenpeace]], for example.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Disarmament treaties]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to the [[Bible]] and God.&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full private property rights&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstating the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals were the most likely supporters of the theory of evolution]]. The theory of [[evolution]] is a key component of [[atheistic]] ideologies in the [[Western World]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Calling anyone they agree with a &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[Barack Obama]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]], a major part of the [[War on Terrorism]].&lt;br /&gt;
* Withholds support to our armed forces fighting overseas to protect their freedoms.&lt;br /&gt;
* Promote arrogance through what they consider superior lifestyles.&lt;br /&gt;
* Tolerance of wrongheaded ideas and lifestyles.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The long romance of Western leftists with some of the bloodiest regimes and political movements in history is a story not told often enough ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.city-journal.org/2009/bc0605bt.html Dupes by Bruce S. Thornton], City Journal - 5 June 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Support of leftist ideologies such as [[socialism]] and nazism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] liberals give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition,  [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|Biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=152&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ==&lt;br /&gt;
The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] and the article exposed the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Barack Obama]] has been criticized concerning [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
== Nazism and socialism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see:'' [[Nazism and socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler.jpg|thumb|250px|right|One of the most well known political parties of the 20th century which was [[socialism|socialistic]] was the [[National Socialist German Workers Party]] (NAZI) which was headed by the [[evolution|evolutionary racist]] [[Adolf Hitler]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://mises.org/daily/1937&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/darwinism-and-the-nazi-race-holocaust&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hourofthetime.com/socialist.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Ludwig von Mises Institute]] declares:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The identification of [[Nazi]] [[Germany]] as a [[socialism|socialist]] state was one of the many great contributions of [[Ludwig von Mises]]...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://mises.org/daily/1937&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal atheists, pederasty and NAMBLA ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''see also:'' [[Atheism, pederasty and NAMBLA]] and [[Teenage homosexuality]] and [[Homosexuality and pederasty]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Harry Hay.jpg|thumbnail|150px|Many consider [[Harry Hay]] to be the founder of the American [[homosexuality|homosexual]] movement.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the well known [[atheism|atheist]] advocates of the [[North American Man-Boy Love Association]] (NAMBLA) are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The atheist, political activist and [[homosexuality|homosexual]] [[David Thorstad]] was a founding member of the North American Man-Boy Love Association.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/abbott/100822&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. '''[[Harry Hay]]''' (1912 - 2002) was a liberal atheist advocate of [[statutory rape]] and the widely acknowledged founder and progenitor of the  activist [[homosexual agenda]] in the [[United States]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The American Spectator Special Report, [http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10450 When Nancy Met Harry], Jeffrey Lord, 10/5/2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Hay joined the [[Communist Party of the United States]] (CPUSA) in 1934.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Boston Phoenix'', [http://bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/other_stories/documents/02511115.htm The real Harry Hay], Michael Bronski, October 31 - November 7, 2002. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He was a vociferous advocate of man/boy love. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The American Spectator Special Report, [http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10450 When Nancy Met Harry], Jeffrey Lord, 10/5/2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1986, Hay marched in a [[homosexual|gay]] parade wearing a shirt emblazoned with the words &amp;quot;[[NAMBLA]] walks with me.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mega.nu/ampp/baldwin_pedophilia_homosexuality.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The writer [[Samuel R. Delaney]] is an atheist and a [[homosexuality|homosexual]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Samuel R. Delaney, ''About writing: seven essays, four letters, and five interviews'', page 36&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.enotes.com/contemporary-literary-criticism/delany-samuel-r&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dalaney has served as a professor at several universities. Delaney said he was a supporter of NAMBLA.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Delany, Samuel R.; Freedman, Carl (2009). Conversations with Samuel R. Delany. Univ. Press of Mississippi, page 143&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== John Maynard Keynes and pederasty ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''see also:'' [[John Maynard Keynes and pederasty]] and [[Teenage homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[John Maynard Keynes]] was the founder of [[Keynesian economics]]. Lytton Strachey, his male bed partner, wrote that Keynes was a “A liberal and a [[homosexuality|sodomite]], An atheist and a statistician.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Keynes and his friends made numerous trips to the resorts surrounding the Mediterranean.  At the resorts, little boys were sold by their families to bordellos which catered to homosexuals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Keynes was a [[bisexual]] who married Lydia Lopokova. In his work ''The Cambridge Apostles, 1820-1914: Liberalism, Imagination, and Friendship in British Intellectual and Professional Life'', William C. Lubenow expresses the opinion that Keynes was an [[agnosticism|agnostic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Cambridge Apostles, 1820-1914: Liberalism, Imagination, and Friendship in British Intellectual and Professional Life, 1998, Cambridge University Press, page 402&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sam Harris claims atheist is right next to child molester as a designation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
see also: [[Views on Atheists]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. [[Sam Harris]] is a founder of the [[New Atheism]] movement. [[Sam Harris]] is quite aware of the stigma surrounding atheism and has even advocated that atheists no longer call themselves atheists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsinitiative.org/story/2007/06/19/interview_with_an_atheist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In fact, Dr. Harris has said concerning the label of atheist, &amp;quot;It's right next to child molester as a designation.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsinitiative.org/story/2007/06/19/interview_with_an_atheist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith &amp;amp;mdash; it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism in North America Today ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Smear merchants.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and most media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are blatantly [[liberal]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism in North America today practices three primary tactics to attack the Republican Party, and sometimes to attack American values in general. These three liberal tactics can be pronounced using the following [[acronym]]: ''SIN''. Liberals (1) '''S'''hift the subject, they (2) '''I'''gnore the facts, and they (3) '''N'''ame call.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scott Baker. [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-herman-cain-give-the-dont-miss-speech-at-cpac/ Did Herman Cain Give the ‘Don’t Miss’ Speech at CPAC?], ''[[The Blaze]], February 12, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[YouTube]]. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N3-j3HM7-A&amp;amp; Herman Cain: &amp;quot;Stupid People Are Ruining America&amp;quot;], February 11, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals typically support a &amp;quot;''mixed''&amp;quot; economy, a policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|'''There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.alde.eu&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liberal-international.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; such as the Liberal Party of Australia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal.org.au/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and tradition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Infamous liberals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Infamous liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Stalin]] was an [[atheism|atheist]], [[communism|communist]], and [[evolution|evolutionist]] dictator who was responsible for the deaths of tens of millions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mao Tse Tung]] - atheist and communist dictator responsible for the deaths of tens of millions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Margaret Sanger]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Wayne Gacy]] - In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, [[serial killer]] John Wayne Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]] and &amp;quot;very liberal&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s151/candypop_02/Serial%20Killers/John%20Wayne%20Gacy/?action=view&amp;amp;current=SERIAL_KILLER_John_Wayne_Gacy_In-1.mp4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gacy was also a [[Democratic Party]] activist who had his picture taken with [[Rosalynn Carter]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.digitaljournal.com/image/45527&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACORN|ACORN - Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative resources]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberalism and art]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Scientific Illiteracy and Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Best_New_Conservative_Words#New_Liberal_Terms|New Liberal Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Billy2</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Albert_Einstein&amp;diff=860260</id>
		<title>Albert Einstein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Albert_Einstein&amp;diff=860260"/>
		<updated>2011-04-06T00:22:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Billy2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:600px-Albert Einstein Head.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Albert Einstein''' (1879-1955) was the most famous [[physicist]] of the 20th century. He was born in Ulm, in Württemberg, [[Germany]] in a [[Judaism|Jewish]] family. During his stay at the [[Switzerland|Swiss]] [[Patent and Trademark Office|Patent Office]] Einstein produced much of his remarkable work. In 1905 he obtained his [[Doctor|doctor's degree]]. He won the [[Nobel Prize]] for his work on the Photoelectric Effect in 1921. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Einstein [[Immigration|immigrated]] to the [[United States of America|United States]] in the late 1930s to take the position of Professor of Theoretical Physics at [[Princeton University|Princeton]]; upon the urging of a colleague in physics, recommended that [[President of the United States of America|President]] [[Franklin Roosevelt|Franklin D. Roosevelt]] develop an [[atomic bomb]] project. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dannen.com/ae-fdr.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He later regretted this and became a passionate [[Pacifism|pacifist]].  In 1952, he was offered the Presidency of [[Israel]], but he turned it down. Einstein collaborated with Dr. Chaim Weizmann in establishing the [[Hebrew]] [[University]] of [[Jerusalem]]. Albert Einstein died on April 18, 1955 at Princeton, [[New Jersey]] at the age of 76.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anecdotes==&lt;br /&gt;
*In 1898, young Albert Einstein applied for admission to the Munich Technical Institute and was turned down. The young man, the Institute declared, &amp;quot;showed no promise&amp;quot; as a student. By 1905, he published his explanation of the special [[theory of relativity]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://oaks.nvg.org/sa5ra17.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Einstein came to Princeton University in 1935 and was asked what he would require for his study. he replied: &amp;quot;A desk, some pads and a pencil, and a large wastebasket to hold all of my mistakes.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://oaks.nvg.org/sa5ra17.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The sculptor Jacob Epstein tells this story:&lt;br /&gt;
*:&amp;quot;When I was doing Professor Albert Einstein's bust he had many a jibe at the Nazi professors, one hundred of whom had condemned his theory of relativity in a book. 'Were I wrong,' he said, 'one professor would have been enough.' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://oaks.nvg.org/sa5ra17.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Works ==&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein contributed to the theory of a [[Special Relativity]] and the theory of [[General Relativity]].  He also contributed to the study of Photoelectric Effect, Brownian Motion and Bose-Einstein Statistics.  He was critical of quantum mechanics and has proposed the EPR-Paradox in attempt to point out spooky aspects of the theory.  The last fifteen years of his life were spent in unsuccessfully searching for a [[Unified Field Theory]].  &lt;br /&gt;
Einstein's best-known scientific work is his 1905 papers on [[Special Relativity]]. Einstein did not cite any references and it was widely and falsely assumed that his work was original. The theory of relativity had already been published by [[Hendrik Lorentz]] and [[Henri Poincaré]]. Einstein's contribution was to give a description of the Lorentz-Poincare theory without reference to the luminiferous aether, and to clarify some of the physical consequences of the theory. He used the term &amp;quot;stationary system&amp;quot; instead of the term aether.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein is also known as the one true God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein then wrote a series of papers applying relativity to gravity using the mathematics of Riemannian Geometry, contributing to [[General Relativity]]. Much of the actual mathematics of general relativity was worked out by Marcel Grossman, David Hilbert, and others. Einstein's main contribution was to give an alternate derivation of the field equations, and to apply them to explain an [[anomaly]] in the advance of the perihelion in Mercury's orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
Arthur Eddington popularized General Relativity by publishing an explanation of it and by attempting to prove the theory experimentally in a dramatic test.  Eddington embarked on a highly publicized trip into the Atlantic Ocean off Africa in order to observe the bending of [[star]]light passing nearby the [[Sun]] during the total [[solar eclipse]] of May 29, 1919.  Eddington returned with a declaration that he had proven Einstein's theory of [[General Relativity]], making Einstein extremely famous&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;On November 8, 1919, for example, the ''London Times'' had an article headlined: &amp;quot;The Revolution In Science/Einstein Versus Newton.&amp;quot; Two days later, ''The New York Times''' headlines read: &amp;quot;Lights All Askew In The Heavens/Men Of Science More Or Less Agog Over Results Of Eclipse Observations/Einstein Theory Triumphs.&amp;quot; [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/relativity/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, when in fact he had selectively used data to attain this result.  No Nobel Prize was given for relativity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2004, NASA launched the satellite Gravity Probe B to test general relativity. The main purpose was to test relativistic frame dragging, but the results have been inconclusive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein compared the effects of large objects on space and time to the way that a large ball placed on a sheet of rubber stretches the material and causes it to sag, and drew the analogy with the way stars and planets warp space-time. A smaller ball rolling along the sagging fabric will be drawn towards the larger ball, in the same way that the Earth is drawn towards the sun, but will not fall into it as long as it continues to move at sufficient speed. This was a change in thinking from the Newtonian cosmos, in which gravity was viewed purely as an attractive force between bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein's statistical explanation of Brownian motion (the random movement of microscopic particles mixed in with pollen) is sometimes credited with helping to confirm the atomic theory at a time when some scientists argued against it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/essay-brownian.htm Einstein on Brownian Motion]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Most scientists had accepted atomic theory a century earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein also published a heuristic explanation of the photoelectric effect in which light has particle like properties as well as wave like properties. According to Maxwell's equations, light is a wave so one might expect that increasing the intensity of light should increase the number of electrons emitted from metal. The German physicist Lénard did an experiment proving that this was not true. Einstein argued that the experiment was consistent with Max Planck's hypothesis that light is quantized and different particles of light or photons have different frequencies. Therefore, increasing the intensity of low frequency photons has no effect, while using a higher (blue or ultra violet) frequency of light does cause more electrons to be emitted. The formula Einstein used to explain this was Planck's formula e = hf, where h is Planck's constant and f is the frequency.[http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae24.cfm?CFID=8792067&amp;amp;CFTOKEN=36662276] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Einstein won a Nobel Prize for explaining the photoelectric effect, Lénard was critical of his accomplishments.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richard J. Evans, The Third Reich in Power, pages 306-309&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Planck and Lénard had already received Nobel Prizes for related work explaining the photoelectric effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein also recognized the value in work done by the physicist Bose when others did not, and helped Bose publish what is now referred to as Bose-Einstein statistics. A simplified explanation is that the statistics for bosons (including light) are different from the statistics for fermions which make up solid matter in that there is no way to tag or differentiate one boson from another for statistical comparisons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;===&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein’s famous formula E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; says that mass and energy can turn into each other. It was first published by H. Poincare. Einstein published an alternate derivation that was corrected and improved by M. Planck. E stands for [[energy]], m is [[mass]], and c is the [[speed of light]]. So, if you increase the energy of a substance, for example by heating it, it gains a minute amount of mass. It was later realized that if you split an atom apart, as in a nuclear explosion, it loses a tiny amount of mass and you release a huge amount of [[energy]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The connection E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; to nuclear energy is not as direct as pop culture sometimes represents. Einstein did not discover the huge energy available from nuclear reactions. Early workers in radioactivity, such as Ernest Rutherford, understood clearly that the natural radioactive decay of radium released quantities of energy that could not be explained by chemistry, and were much larger than those of chemical reactions. Neither did Einstein originate the key idea that made nuclear energy a possible weapon or a practical energy source. That was Leo Szilard, who acknowledged having been inspired by a 1914 H. G. Wells novel. Szilard discovered or invented the chain reaction (and patented it). However, other people recognized the relation between Einstein's interpretation of the E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; formula and chain reactions. Einstein explained that matter releasing energy is also losing mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Energy binds together the parts of an [[atom]], including the [[nucleus]]. The nucleus of an atom is tiny, but very little mass could release a huge amount of energy. When one nucleus splits apart, it splits other nuclei around it. This is called a [[chain reaction]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cosmological Constant===&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein revised his work on [[General Relativity]] to include a 'fudge-factor' which he termed the [[Cosmological Constant]]. He was trying to account for the apparent steady-state nature of the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Edwin Hubble]], in whose name [[NASA]]'s famous [[Hubble Space Telescope]] is named, later convinced him otherwise.  At one point he had Einstein actually making direct observations alongside him, and Hubble's findings showed conclusively that the [[universe]] was indeed expanding, as predicted by certain solutions of GR's field equations in the absence of a cosmological constant.  Einstein recanted his original [[philosophy]], and accepted as true the notion of a changing universe having a definite [[begin]]ning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He later said of his Cosmological Constant, &amp;quot;It was the biggest blunder of my life.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An interesting end-note on this term: Principle investigators from [[Princeton University]] first published findings in 1998 apparently revealing an accelerating expansion for the universe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_mm.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Because this initially seemed like it might be a sort of 'anti-gravity' effect (similar in concept to Einstein's original notion), it briefly became quite popular for scientists to dub the phenomenon the 'Cosmological Constant' as well.  For more information, see: [[Dark Energy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Writings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Special Theory of Relativity (1905)&lt;br /&gt;
*Relativity (English translations, 1920 and 1950) &lt;br /&gt;
*General Theory of Relativity (1916) &lt;br /&gt;
*Investigations on Theory of Brownian Movement (1926) &lt;br /&gt;
*The Evolution of Physics (1938) &lt;br /&gt;
*About Zionism (1930)&lt;br /&gt;
*Why War? (1933), &lt;br /&gt;
*My Philosophy (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
*(The World As I See It) (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
*Out of My Later Years (1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''...the daily effort comes from no deliberate intention or program, but straight from the heart.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Honors ==&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein received honorary doctorate degrees in science, medicine and philosophy from many American and European universities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He won the Nobel Prize in 1921 for his work on the Photoelectric Effect.&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;It strikes me as unfair, and even in bad taste, to select a few individuals for boundless admiration, attributing superhuman powers of mind and character to them. This has been my fate, and the contrast between the popular assessment of my powers and achievements and the reality is simply grotesque.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue38/einstein.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein told a friend in 1930, &amp;quot;To punish me for my contempt of authority, Fate has made me an authority myself.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue38/einstein.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He gained the Copley Medal of the Royal Society of London in 1925 and the Franklin Medal of the Franklin Institute in 1935.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein was offered the presidency of Israel in 1952 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.einstein-website.de/z_information/variousthings.html#president]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but respectfully declined because he believed his life-long scientific attitude of objectivity made him an inappropriate candidate for such a high political position, he was also strongly opposed to nationalism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1999, he was named &amp;quot;Person of the Century&amp;quot; by &amp;quot;Time&amp;quot; magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Einstein and the A-bomb==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1939 research done by several leading scientists including [[Enrico Fermi]] regarding chain reactions of nuclear fission prompted [[Leo Szilard]] to persuade Einstein to write a letter to President &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Roosevelt]] [http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, to warn the President about the possibility of nuclear weapons and that Nazi [[Germany]] had already taken an interest in this technology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein himself had never been involved in the [[Manhattan project]]. He was considered a security risk, as he was a member, sponsor, or affiliated with thirty-four communist fronts between 1937 and 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/einstein.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Later he condemned the use of nuclear weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy Surrounding His Death==&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Thomas Stoltz Harvey, then a pathologist, performed the autopsy on Einstein in the [[Princeton Medical Center]] several hours after his death.  Upon completion, Dr. Harvey removed the brain and eyes &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NPR, [http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4602913]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  There is controversy about whether or not Harvey had consent from the Einstein family to remove the brain and keep it, though letters from Otto Nathan, executor of the Einstein estate, suggest that Harvey did indeed have permission to keep the brain, as long as research performed on it was only described in scientific journals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The brain was photographed and sliced into 240 pieces in order to be preserved and further studied.  Harvey hoped some uniqueness would be discovered that distinguished Einstein's brain as &amp;quot;genius&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although he sent pieces away for further study, the bulk of the brain remained with Harvey for over 40 years. His once-ambitious plans for doing research on Einstein's brain were never actualized, though there were at least two controversial studies performed which suggested a physical reason for Einstein's intelligence. In 1996 Harvey entrusted Elliot Krauss, cheif [[pathologist]] at the Princeton Medical Center, with the brain. The brain now sits in a secret location, possibly only a few feet away from where it was first removed from Einstein's head. Krauss loans out pieces of the brain for scientific research, but he is very discriminating in deciding whom shall receive a piece.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Abraham, Carolyn. ''Possessing Genius''. Icon Books Ltd (2005)&amp;lt;/reF&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious views==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Einstein inshul1930.jpg|right|thumb|Einstein wearing a kippah in a Berlin Synagogue, 1930.|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
There is some controversy surrounding the religion of Albert Einstein.  &lt;br /&gt;
He explained his religious views to [[Time Magazine]] in this manner: &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;“I'm not an [[atheist]]. I don't think I can call myself a [[pantheist]]. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn't know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God. We see the universe marvelously arranged and obeying certain laws but only dimly understand these laws.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1607298,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the same interview, Einstein spoke of his feelings regarding Christianity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As a child I received instruction both in the Bible and in the Talmud. I am a Jew, but I am enthralled by the luminous figure of the Nazarene.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And when asked if he accepted the historical existence of Jesus, Einstein replied:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Unquestionably! No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word. No myth is filled with such life.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein also said &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognise, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support of such views.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/Einstein-Life-Universe-Walter-Isaacson/dp/0743264738&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fanatical atheists, are like slaves who are still feeling the weight of their chains which they have thrown off after hard struggle. They are creatures who--in their grudge against traditional religion as the 'opium of the masses'-- cannot hear the music of the spheres.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/Einstein-Life-Universe-Walter-Isaacson/dp/0743264738&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;God does not play dice with the universe.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.quotedb.com/quotes/878&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/Einstein-Life-Universe-Walter-Isaacson/dp/0743264738&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/12/peopleinscience.religion&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;as quoted in &amp;quot;Albert Einstein - The Human Side&amp;quot;, Selected and Edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman, Princeton University Press, 1979 from a letter on March 24th, 1954&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taken as a whole, it appears Einstein rejected the literal stories of God's personal involvement with the Hebrews, but he did believe in the existence of a higher power as a metaphor for what we did not know about the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Views On Judaism and Zionism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Einst 22.jpg|right|thumb|Einstein with [[David Ben-Gurion]].|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1920, in a letter to the Central Association of German Citizens of the Jewish Faith, Einstein wrote&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I am neither a German citizen, nor is there in me anything that can be described as ‘Jewish faith.’ But I am happy to belong to the Jewish people, even if I do not consider them in any way God's elect.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein do not view fellow Jews as co-religionists, but as tribal companions.&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein was made an honorary citizen of [[Tel Aviv]] during his visit in 1923.&lt;br /&gt;
In 1952, Einstein was offered the position of president of Israel by the 1st prime minster of [[Israel]] David Ben-Gurion, but declined the offer.  Before his death in 1955, Einstein wrote to the Zionist leader Kurt Blumenfeld:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I thank you, even at this late hour, for having made me conscious of the Jewish soul.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein willed that all his scholarly work be archived in Israel's Hebrew University after his death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein always expressed his anti-war views and staunchly opposed nationalism:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;&amp;quot;He who joyfully marches to rank and file, has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice. This disgrace to civilization should be done away with at once. Heroism on command, how violently I hate all this, how despicable and ignoble war is; I would rather be torn to shreds than be a part of so a base of action. It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Einstein on Germany and the rise of Hitler==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1944, in a message to a bulletin run by Polish Jews in New York, Einstein wrote&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Germans as an entire people are responsible for the mass murders and must be punished as a people if there is justice in the world and if the consciousness of collective responsibility in the nations is not to perish from the earth entirely. Behind the Nazi party stands the German people, who elected Hitler after he had in his book [Mein Kampf] and in his speeches made his shameful [genocidal] intentions clear beyond the possibility of misunderstanding.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unsupported attributions == &lt;br /&gt;
* Many ideas and quotes are falsely attributed to Einstein. He did not invent very much of we now call [[special relativity]]. The Principle of Relativity, that the law of physics should be the same in all inertial frames, had already been published before Einstein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0408077]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He did not discover the [[Lorentz transformation]], or the Lorentz invariance of [[Maxwell's equations]] for electromagnetism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://eprint.uq.edu.au/archive/00002307/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was not the first to propose that the [[speed of light]] is constant for all observers, or that &amp;quot;[[the aether]]&amp;quot; is superfluous and not observable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lost in Einstein's Shadow, American Scientist, 2006. [http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/49611/page/1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was not the first to recognize and explain how special relativity causes an ambiguity in defining simultaneity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/Poincare.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He did not combine space and time into a four-dimensional [[spacetime]] in his special relativity papers until others had been doing it for a couple of years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Einstein did not invent the term &amp;quot;relativity theory&amp;quot;, and did not even like the term. He called it the &amp;quot;so-called relativity theory&amp;quot; until 1911. Einstein did not banish the ether from Physics. In a 1920 lecture, he said, &amp;quot;More careful reflection teaches us, however, that the special theory of relativity does not compel us to deny æther.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Quoted by Tulane astrophysicist Frank J. Tipler, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1271310&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Einstein was not the first to observe the equation E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; as a consequence of special relativity,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;H. Poincare published it in 1900. [http://www.serve.com/herrmann/ein.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
or to foresee its application to [[nuclear binding]] energies or [[antimatter]] annihilation. &lt;br /&gt;
* Einstein only published faulty and incomplete proofs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Einstein's Mistakes: The Human Failings of Genius, by Hans C. Ohanian, http://www.amazon.com/Einsteins-Mistakes-Human-Failings-Genius/dp/0393062937&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://discovermagazine.com/2008/sep/01-einstein.s-23-biggest-mistakes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* He did not foresee a nuclear [[chain reaction]] and had to be persuaded about the possibility of an [[atomic bomb]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* However, Einstein's interpretation of the E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; equation was fairly popular. &lt;br /&gt;
* According to Einstein, a body losing energy through heat or [[radiation]] was losing mass.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Einstein, A., 1905, [http://www.physik.uni-augsburg.de/annalen/history/papers/1905_18_639-641.pdf Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von dessen Energieinhalt abhängig?], Annalen der Physik, volume 18, pages 639–643. See also [http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www English translation].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Einstein did not originate the idea of using non-Euclidean geometry&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;His friend Paul Ehrenfest pointed out the need for curved space. [http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/181349/Albert-Einstein]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[metric tensor]]s to reconcile gravity with special relativity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.univ-nancy2.fr/DepPhilo/walter/papers/b4.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was not his idea to describe gravity in [[covariant equations]], and he published papers supposedly showing that it was impossible.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/decades_re-set.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He did not discover the Lagrangian formulation of [[general relativity]], and was not the first to publish the field equations. He did not foresee the [[expansion of the universe]] (although this expansion is consistent with the field equations), the possibility of black holes, or [[dark energy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Einstein did not originate the idea that light is observable as particles. Max Planck published that a few years before Einstein, and received a Nobel prize for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Einstein did not prove that matter was made of atoms. That had been known for a century when Einstein published his 1905 paper on Brownian motion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Einstein never developed a [[unified field theory]] of any significance. He published papers on [[quantum mechanics]], but always insisted on a deterministic interpretation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Many quotes are falsely attributed to Einstein. Here are a few. &amp;quot;If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only have four years of life left.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;We use only 10% of our brains.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Evil is simply the absence of God.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Originality is the art of concealing your sources.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;!-- please show location of quotes attributed to Einstein and who said them if they are to be attributed to another individual --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some quotes that have been attributed to Einstein, but which have not been verified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=H-GfO0jkBLsC&amp;amp;pg=PA146&amp;amp;dq=The+difference+between+stupidity+and+genius+is+that+genius+has+its+limits&amp;amp;ei=NtAaSsTZBZj2MJ2NyL8J And I Quote - Genius Page 146] by By Ashton Applewhite, William R. Evans, Tripp Evans, Andrew Frothingham &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=MbC45UX_4gMC&amp;amp;pg=PT19&amp;amp;dq=Learn+from+yesterday,+live+for+today,+hope+for+tomorrow.+The+important+thing+is+not+to+stop+questioning.&amp;amp;ei=Mdk-SormHozayQT1-uS-AQ A vision of transdisciplinarity : laying foundations for a world knowledge] by Frédéric Darbellay, Moira Cockell, Jerome Billotte&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=CNuwE3NL1QgC&amp;amp;pg=PA388&amp;amp;dq=Whoever+is+careless+with+the+truth+in+small+matters+cannot+be+trusted+with+important+matters&amp;amp;ei=swRFSoSYM46yzASEy8Bc Albert Einstein: historical and cultural perspectives : the centennial - Page 388] by Gerald James Holton&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.relativitycalculator.com/E=mc2.shtml Relativity Calculator - e=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; derivation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The Nobel Prize in Physics 1921&amp;quot;[http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;On The Electrodynamics Of Moving Bodies&amp;quot;[http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Does The Inertia Of A Body Depend Upon Its Energy-Content?&amp;quot;[http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
*Michael Paterniti, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Driving Mr. Albert: A Trip Across America With Einstein's Brain&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Collected Quotes from Albert Einstein&amp;quot; [http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~cheshire/EinsteinQuotes.html]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Confusion regarding Einstein's Religion&amp;quot;[http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/1gmarchive/2004/04/confusion.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Einstein, Albert}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nobel laureates in Physics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physicists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:German People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Zionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion and Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Billy2</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>