<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=BenPa</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=BenPa"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/BenPa"/>
	<updated>2026-10-10T04:44:51Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nazi_Party&amp;diff=765409</id>
		<title>Nazi Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nazi_Party&amp;diff=765409"/>
		<updated>2010-03-27T17:07:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BenPa: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Flag of Nazi Germany.png|thumb|200px|'''The flag of Nazi Germany''' featuring the notorious swastika]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Nazi Party''' ('''NSDAP''', formally the ''Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei'' or in English ''National Socialist German Workers' Party''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Nazi&amp;quot; comes from the first word in the party's name, '''Na'''tionalso'''zi'''alistische.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) was a totalitarian movement and liberal party in [[Germany]] from 1919-1945. It was controlled after 1922 by [[Adolf Hitler]]. In 1933 the Nazis came to power in Germany and took control of the government and most sectors of Germany's society and economy. The Nazi regime in Germany 1933-45 called itself the '''[[Third Reich]].''' The Nazis rearmed Germany, conquered the neighbors, murdered six million Jewish civilians and an estimated 15 million other 'undesirables' in the [[Holocaust]] and was finally destroyed in [[World War II]] by the [[Allies]] (the United States, Britain and the Soviet Union, along with smaller countries). Like Hitler, the Nazis have become synonymous with evil in the modern world. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The socialism Hitler advocated is much closer to that of Soviet [[communism]] than many people realize,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://mises.org/story/1937 Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian] - George  Reisman - Mises Institute.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; especially those who think in terms of &amp;quot;[[right wing]]&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;[[left wing]]&amp;quot; politics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Foundations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Adolf Hitler]]  exploited the myth of the “Stab in the Back,” the belief that the [[World War I]] had been lost because “disloyal” elements within Germany – [[Jews]] and [[Marxism|Marxists]] – had undermined the war effort. As [[William Shirer]] put it in ''The Rise and Fall of the [[Third Reich]]'', &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;To him, as to almost all Germans, it was ‘monstrous’ and undeserved. The German army had not been defeated in the field. It had been stabbed in the back by the traitors at home.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus emerged for [[Hitler]], as or so many Germans, a fanatical belief in the legend of the ‘stab in the back’ which, more than anything else, was to undermine the Weimar Republic and pave the way for Hitler’s ultimate triumph.”&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=rise&amp;gt;The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, Book One, “The Rise of Adolf Hitler.” &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The origin of the Nazi Party itself was a small group called The German Workers' Party, founded by a locksmith named Anton Drexler who, in 1918, had set up a “Committee of Independent Workmen” in reaction to the [[Marxism]]  of the free trade unions.&amp;lt;ref name=rise /&amp;gt; A year later The German Workers Party was formed when this merged with another group, the Political Workers' Circle. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shoah Resource Center, http://www1.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/Microsoft%20Word%20-%205946.pdf &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Germanculture.com, http://www.germanculture.com.ua/library/weekly/aa012400b.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was Adolf Hitler, who joined the party and was put in charge of propaganda in 1920, who transformed this small group into what we now know as the Nazi Party through his great skill in politics and public speaking. That same year the words “National Socialist” were added to the party name and it became “The National Socialist German Workers Party” (NSDAP).  The Storm Troopers (Sturmabteilung, [[Brownshirts|SA]]) in their distinctive brown uniforms, were organized first to kick out hecklers at Nazi meetings, then to break up the meetings of other parties. The hakenkreuz (literally: ''hooked cross''), or the [[swastika]], was adopted in the party’s flag. By the following summer, Hitler himself had taken over as leader (de: Führer) of the party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Here we have the core of Nazism: (i) a very strong dose of German anti-semitism (with a paranoid belief in a conspiracy between Jewish financiers who control the capitalist economy and steal from the Germans, Jewish liberal intellectuals who preach humanism and enfeeble the Germans, and Jewish communists who seek to enslave the Germans; (ii) a belief in the German nation and the &amp;quot;aryan&amp;quot; German race as an entity with a special, heroic destiny; (iii) war as the ultimate test of national strength and worth; and (iv) conquest--with extermination or removal of the resident population--to create more &amp;quot;living space&amp;quot; or the German people and larger fields for the German farmers. Add to this (a) the &amp;quot;leadership principle&amp;quot;--a hatred of parliamentary institutions, and a belief that a good political order sees an inspired leader giving people vision and commands (rather than see parliamentarians haggle and compromise on behalf of interest groups)--(b) the use of terror to obtain obedience, and (c) the desire to make sure that all of society's organizations serve the national cause, and you have Nazism. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://econ161.berkeley.edu/TCEH/Slouch_Alternatives12.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anti-Semitism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Nazis were highly [[Anti-Semitism|anti-Semitic]] and blamed the Jews for many of the problems in Germany, such as the defeat in [[World War I]]. &lt;br /&gt;
The Nazis passed the [[Nuremberg Laws]] in 1935 which stated that:&lt;br /&gt;
* Young German women could not work for Jews in the domestic services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Jews were no longer citizens of Germany (this meant that they had no protection from the police and so were susceptible to attack)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jewish doctors were not allowed to treat Germans/Aryans&lt;br /&gt;
* Jews could not marry Germans/Aryans&lt;br /&gt;
They made laws against Jews (&amp;quot;Rassengesetze&amp;quot;, ''race laws'') which places successively tighter restrictions on the rights of Jews to own property, use public services, live in some areas, enter public spaces and eventually required Jews  wear a [[Star of David]] on their clothing. &lt;br /&gt;
The Jews were mistreated, persecuted, and killed by the Nazis.  &lt;br /&gt;
The Nazi state also persecuted other political opponents, such as [[Jehovah's Witnesses]]. State-run hospitals secretly euthanized the very old, the sick, mentally ill and the disabled. [[homosexuality|Homosexuals]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hans Peter Bleuel, ''Sex and Society in Nazi Germany'', (Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1973).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;came under increasing scrutiny and persecution in the later years of the regime.  &lt;br /&gt;
The Nazis exterminated at least 11 million civilians by rounding them up, transporting them to concentration camps and then murdering them there. About 6 million of these were Jews (see [[Holocaust]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
Nazis rejected Christianity as spoiled by Judaism, but did support a new pro-Nazi Protestant church that had a few followers.  The Nazis tried to minimize the influence of Protestant and Catholic chruches, while promoting as pre-Christian German paganism. Adolf Hitler was raised Roman Catholic as a youth, but he began to dispise the church and all of Christianity as too pacifist or a &amp;quot;religion for weaklings&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Alfred Rosenberg ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Alfred Rosenberg, the party's official philosopher, announced the philosophic basis of the Nazi campaign. In his ''The Myth of the Twentieth Century'' he scorns the Old Testament, and while he takes Jesus more seriously, he concludes,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Time (Sept 03, 1934)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
:The religion of Jesus was undoubtedly the preaching of love . . . but the German religious movement, which wishes to develop into a people's church, must declare that it unconditionally subordinates the ideal of neighborly love to the ideal of national honor . . . The churches, handed over to it again, will, little by little, put the fiery spirit of the hero . . . in place of the crucifixion.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The outspoken pagan Rosenberg drew up a thirty-point program for the ''National Reich Church'', created in 1936, which contains the following statements,   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The National Reich Church of Germany categorically claims the exclusive right and the exclusive power to control all churches within the borders of the Reich: it declares these to be national churches of the German Reich.&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The National Church is determined to exterminate irrevocably...the strange and foreign Christian faiths imported into Germany in the ill-omened year 800...&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The National Church has no scribes, pastors, chaplains or priests, but National Reich orators are to speak in them.&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The National Church demands immediate cessation of the publishing and dissemination of the Bible in Germany...'&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;On the altars there must be nothing but 'Mein Kampf' (to the German nation and therefore to God the most sacred book) and to the left of the altar a sword.&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;On the day of its foundation, the Christian Cross must be removed from all churches, cathedrals and chapels...and it must be superseded by the only unconquerable symbol, the swastika.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, William L. Shirer, P. 240&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When a Manchester Guardian correspondent attended a Berlin meeting of the German People's Church, he found it a noisy, enthusiastic, a theological free-for-all. One Dr. Krause exclaimed, &amp;quot;The lives and utterances of great Germans must be considered equal to the Bible as revelations...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Pagan cults ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout Germany strange little pagan cults were seen to arise, such as the pantheistic  Nordic Religious Community.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Youth Leader Hartmann-Lautenbacher stated,  &amp;quot;Besides the rock of Jesus Christ there is another: Adolf Hitler. It remains to be seen which of the two is stronger. On the one sit the old women. On the other stands the young generation.&amp;quot;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Youth Press Agent August Hoppe exhorted war against Christianity, and a return to pagan roots. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similar to what some see today in the West, Youth Leader Joachim Benedicte stated, &amp;quot;...The religious faith of the German people must be decided by political elements, the Storm Troops and the Hitler Youth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Religion: Nazis v. Jesus Christ, Time. 9-03-1934&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As in Communism, the State, or ''Fatherland'' came to be deified, in the name of which Hitler justified his autocratic decision to kill - for political purposes - a large number of S.A. leaders while they were at a resort, during the &amp;quot;Night of the Long Knives.&amp;quot;    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather than initially attacking Christian faith outright, the Nazi party promoted itself as &amp;quot;positive Christianity,&amp;quot; and vigorously opposed what they call &amp;quot;negative Christianity&amp;quot;, both terms being Nazi inventions which could mean whatever the local Nazi leader chooses them to mean.  In their Manifesto of their &amp;quot;anxieties and fears&amp;quot;,  the German Evangelical Church quoted Rosenberg as saying, &amp;quot;The general ideas of the Roman and of the Protestant churches are negative Christianity and do not, therefore, accord with our soul.&amp;quot; The Manifesto concludes: &amp;quot;When, within the compass of the Nazi view of life, an anti-Semitism is forced on the Christian that binds him to hatred of the Jew, the Christian injunction to love one's neighbor still stands...The Evangelical conscience is most heavily burdened by the fact that there are still concentration camps in Germany that describes itself as a country in which Justice is administered...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Time magazine, Aug. 10, 1936, Foreign News: Churchmen to Hitler&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Religious persecution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall however, the spiritual condition of Germany may be seen to have been weak by and during the time of Hitler's rise to power. Protestant churches in Germany had become largely institutionalized, and its power to effect political change decreased. The Catholic Institution had been pressured into a Concordant with Hitler, which the latter continually broke. Loyalties were torn as [[national socialism]] became the cause, and churches were pressured to submit to its ethos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''A history of national socialism, Cross against Swastika'', by Konrad Heiden&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Pius XII and the Nazis'', by Darlene Shelton&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;Jews were overall seen negatively, stubborn and ungrateful.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Martin Luther and &amp;quot;The Jews&amp;quot; A Reappraisal'', by Dr. Christopher Probst&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After their rise to power the Nazis sought to purge the national German Evangelical Church of converted Jews, as well to make the church ideologically submissive to the state. By entertaining the Nazi doctrine of Aryan racial superiority and persecution of Jews, they militated against the authoritative position of the Scriptures. Largely in reaction to such the [[Confessing Church]] emerged. This Protestant church was not recognized by the Nazi's, and was persecuted and finally forced underground, as many members and leaders, such as [[Martin Niemöller]], were particularly active in protesting against euthanasia and the persecution of the Jews.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition, 2008; Confessing Church&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica, 2009, Confessing Church&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measures taken against the Christian Churches were an integral part of [[National Socialism]]. An [[OSS]] report to the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]] Stated,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;The Nazi conspirators, by promoting beliefs and practices incompatible with Christian teaching, sought to subvert the influence of the Churches over the people and in particular over the youth of Germany. They avowed their aim to eliminate the Christian Churches in Germany and sought to substitute therefore Nazi institutions and Nazi beliefs and pursued a programme of persecution of priests, clergy and members of monastic orders whom they deemed opposed to their purposes and confiscated Church property.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Claire Hulme &amp;amp; Dr. Michael Salter, [http://www-camlaw.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/articles/RJLR_3_1_2.pdf ''The Nazi's Persecution as a War Crime: The OSS Response Within the Nuremeberg Trial's Process''], Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion, n.d.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though Christians sometime hold Hitler to be an atheist, and atheists often assert he was a Christian, the best evidence shows him to be neither, in particular failing to be the latter, especially in the Biblical sense of the word (being both the source and most authoritative definition of it). In contrast, evidence reveals that while Hitler shared with many atheists a dramatically skewed idea of what Christianity is, and or made political use of the term, he was quite the contrary to being a Christian.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.amazon.com/Hitler-Holocaust-Bible-Scriptural-Anti-Semitism/dp/0982277601 Hitler, the Holocaust, and the Bible:   A Scriptural Analysis..., by Joe Keysor]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resource site Adherents.com states, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no question that Hitler was a Nazi. Nazism was clearly his most important religious affiliation, not in the positive way the word “religion” is often defined, but in the general sense that any philosophy or belief system which is most important in a person’s life is that person’s “religion,” regardless of whether or not it is universally labelled as a “religion.” Hitler was also born into a Catholic family, but he rejected Catholicism and in most ways he rejected Christianity in general. On occasion we have read people claim that “Hitler was a Catholic” or “Hitler was a Christian” in a meaningful way, implying that Christianity or Catholicism was the primary impetus for his Nazi reign. Such claims are simply vitriolic attacks occasionally voiced by ideologically-inclined anti-Christian, anti-Semitic or pro-Nazi people. Historians agree that Hitler was pointedly anti-Christian. We are not aware of any published sources from acknowledged academic historians or writers that identify Adolf Hitler as significantly Catholic or Christian in his motivations as an adult.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adherents.com/people/ph/Adolf_Hitler.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hossbach Memorandum ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Hossbach Memorandum, Hitler blamed Christianity for the fall of Rome (rather than such being a judgment due to its degradation, and persecution of Christians and its message), stating: &amp;quot;It was only the disintegrating effect of Christianity, and the symptoms of age which appear in every country, which caused ancient Rome to succumb to the onslaught of the Germans.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/hossbach.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Albert Speer records that Hitler lamented, “You see, it’s been our misfortune to have the wrong religion.&amp;quot; and that Islam would have more compatible for them than Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=XLSa_RIDHMUC&amp;amp;dq=Albert+Speer,+Inside+the+Third+Reich,&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;amp;source=bn&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ei=551HSrzDDcm0twf6x7TbBg&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;resnum=5 Inside the Third Reich, p. 96]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In another statement attributed to Hitler, he predicts, “I’m going to become a religious figure. Soon I’ll be the great chief of the Tartars. Already Arabs and Moroccans are mingling my name with their prayers.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Adolf Hitler, cited in Waite, Robert, Adolf Hitler: The Psychopathic God (NY: Basic Books, 1977) p. 261) (Lutzer, pp. 62-63.)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2132855/posts?page=101#101]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hitler's Table Talk ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clear but disputable evidence reveals Hitler as promoting a form of paganism, which the Nazi party clearly sought to promote. ''Hitler's Table Talk'' is a series of informal, private conversations among Hitler and his closest associates, as recorded by (anti-Catholic) Martin Bormann. The ex tempore remarks excerpted below are attributed to Hitler:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Adolf Hitler, London, Weidenfeld &amp;amp; Nicholson, 1953&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Night of 11th-12th July, 1941&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;[[National Socialism]] and religion cannot exist together....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew. The deliberate lie in the matter of religion was introduced into the world by Christianity....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Let it not be said that Christianity brought man the life of the soul, for that evolution was in the natural order of things.&amp;quot; (p 6 &amp;amp; 7)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10th October, 1941, midday&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Christianity is a rebellion against natural law, a protest against nature. Taken to its logical extreme, Christianity would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure.&amp;quot; (p 43)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14th October, 1941, midday&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The best thing is to let Christianity die a natural death.... When understanding of the universe has become widespread... Christian doctrine will be convicted of absurdity....&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Christianity has reached the peak of absurdity.... And that's why someday its structure will collapse....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;...the only way to get rid of Christianity is to allow it to die little by little....&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Christianity &amp;lt;is&amp;gt; the liar...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We'll see to it that the Churches cannot spread abroad teachings in conflict with the interests of the State.&amp;quot; (p 49-52)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19th October, 1941, night&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The reason why the ancient world was so pure, light and serene was that it knew nothing of the two great scourges: the pox and Christianity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
21st October, 1941, midday&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Originally, Christianity was merely an incarnation of Bolshevism, the destroyer....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The decisive falsification of Jesus' [who he asserts many times was never a Jew] doctrine was the work of St.Paul. He gave himself to this work... for the purposes of personal exploitation....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;When all is said, we have no reason to wish that the Italians and Spaniards should free themselves from the drug of Christianity. Let's be the only people who are immunized against the disease.&amp;quot; (p 118-119)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14th December, 1941, midday&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Kerrl, with noblest of intentions, wanted to attempt a synthesis between National Socialism and Christianity. I don't believe the thing's possible, and I see the obstacle in Christianity itself....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Pure Christianity-- the Christianity of the catacombs-- is concerned with translating Christian doctrine into facts. It leads quite simply to the annihilation of mankind. It is merely whole-hearted Bolshevism, under a tinsel of metaphysics.&amp;quot; (p 119 &amp;amp; 120)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9th April, 1942, dinner&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;There is something very unhealthy about Christianity.&amp;quot; (p 339)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
27th February, 1942, midday&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Our epoch in the next 200 years will certainly see the end of the disease of Christianity.... My regret will have been that I couldn't... behold &amp;lt;its demise&amp;gt;.&amp;quot; (p 278)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Miscellaneous other quotes include,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;So it's not opportune to hurl ourselves now into a struggle with the churches. The best thing is to let Christianity die a natural death. A slow death has something comforting about it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Christianity, of course, has reached the peak of absurdity in this respect. And that's why one day its structure will collapse. Science has already impregnated humanity. Consequently, the more Christianity clings to its dogmas, the quicker it will decline.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We'll see to it that the churches cannot spread abroad teachings in conflict with the interests of the State. We shall continue to preach the doctrine of National Socialism, and the young will no longer be taught anything but the truth.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Indeed, it's most important that the higher belief should be well established in them before the lower belief has been removed. We must finally achieve this.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We do not want to educate anyone in atheism.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The observatory I'll have built at Linz, on the Pöstlingberg, I can see it in my mind ... In future, thousands of excursionists will make a pilgrimage there every Sunday. They'll thus have access to the greatness of our universe. The pediment will bear this motto: 'The heavens proclaim the glory of the everlasting.' It will be our way of giving men a religious spirit, of teaching them humility — but without the priests.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The final state must be: in St. Peter's Chair, a senile officiant; facing him, a few sinister old women, as gaga and as poor in spirit as anyone could wish.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;For my part, in his place [the Duce] I'd have taken the path of revolution. I'd have entered the Vatican and thrown everybody out — reserving the right to apologize later: 'Excuse me, it was a mistake!' But the result would have been, they'd have been outside!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 [[Image:Nazi.jpg|thumb|right|250px|&amp;quot;With our flags is our victory&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;But a pope, even a criminal one, who protects great artists and spreads beauty around him, is nevertheless more sympathetic to me than the protestant minister who drinks from the poisoned spring.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I have six Divisions of SS composed of men absolutely indifferent in matters of religion. It doesn't prevent them from going to their deaths with serenity in their souls.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The soul and the mind migrate, just as the body returns to nature. Thus life is eternally reborn from life. As for the 'why' of all that, I feel no need to rack my brains on the subject. The soul is unplumbable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hitler on Religion: http://library.flawlesslogic.com/religion.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler, much like atheists, is seen to not only have scorned corruptions of Christian faith, but the whole faith as well. Having loosed himself from the moral authority of the Bible (though misappropriating it's &amp;quot;badge&amp;quot; at times for his own purposes) he was much free to be guided by his own &amp;quot;golden  compass&amp;quot;, which is ultimately the atheistic basis for determining morality. Tragically however, while an innate sense of right can be right, Hitler's compass pointed south rather than north.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic planning==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[James Burnham]], a former [[Trotskyite]] who served with the [[Office of Strategic Services]] (OSS) during the World War II and later contributed to the ''[[National Review]]'', described  the Nazi regime's [[economic planning]].  Burnham pointed out how the original &amp;quot;workers revolution&amp;quot; of [[Marxism]] had in fact become a managerial revolution in all societies were Socialism had been embraced.  Writing in 1940, Burnham noted,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Outright state ownership and operation, advancing in all fields, are particularly ascendant in the extensive areas of new enterprise opened up during the Nazi rule....virtually all economic enterprise is subject to rigid state control; and it is control which we have seen to be decisive in relation to the instruments of production. Legal forms, even income privileges, are in the end subordinate to ''de facto'' control. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even where private owners still exist in Germany, the decisions about &amp;quot;their&amp;quot; property are not in their hands. They do not decide what to make or not to make. They do not establish prices or bargain about wages. They are not at liberty to buy the raw materials they might choose nor to seek the most profitable markets. They cannot, as a rule, decide how to invest or not invest their surplus funds. In short, they are no longer owners, no longer effective [[capitalist]]s...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The regulation of production in Germany is no longer left to the market. What is to be produced, and how much, is decided, deliberately, by groups of men, by the state boards and bureaus and commissions. It is they that decide whether a new plant shall be built or an old plant retired, how raw materials shall be allotted and orders distributed, what quotas must be fulfilled by various branches of industry, what goods shall be put aside for export, how prices shall be fixed and credit and exchange extended. There is no requirement that these decisions of the bureaus must be based on any profit aim in the capitalist sense. If it is thought expedient, for whatever reason, to produce, for example, an ersatz rubber or wool or food, this will be done even if the production entails, from a capitalist point of view, a heavy loss. Similarly, in order to accumulate foreign exchange or to stimulate some political effect in a foreign nation, goods will be exported regardless of loss. A factory may be compelled to shut down, even though it could operate at a high profit. Banks and individuals are forced to invest their funds with no reference to the private and voluntary opinions about &amp;quot;risks&amp;quot; from a profit standpoint. It is literally true to say that the Nazi economy, already, is not a &amp;quot;profit economy.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The workers, on their side, are no longer the &amp;quot;free proletarians&amp;quot; of capitalism. Under Nazism the workers are indeed, free from unemployment. At the same time they cannot, as individuals or through their own independent organizations, bargain for wages or change jobs at will. They are assigned to their tasks, and their labor conditions are fixed, by the decisions of the state bureaus and commissions. Millions of them are allotted to the vast state enterprises. ...With the reduction in the area of private enterprise and the increase of state enterprise, goes also a corresponding reduction in the social position of the private capitalists. So far as control over the instruments of production goes, the capitalists are already near the bottom. As to income privilege: a recent estimate by a New York statistician gives as a mere 5% the share of the German national income going to profits and interest. This is a substantial reduction from the 1933 figures, in spite of a huge increase in the total national income, which, under capitalism, would normally be accompanied by a percentage increase in profits. ...f the German capitalists' 5%, the greater part is appropriated by the state as taxes and &amp;quot;contributions.&amp;quot; ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...how seldom we find a manager among the voluntary or forced exiles from Nazi Germany! There are artists and writers among the exiles, ideologists and politicians, unassailable foes of the new regime, storekeepers and professionals and teachers, and not a few capitalists, both Jews and Christians. But almost never a manager....Germany is to-day a managerial state in an early stage. Structurally, it is less advanced along managerial lines than Russia; ...though structurally less advanced...Its industrial and technological foundation is far stronger; the rising managerial class is much larger, better trained, more able...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...The first part of the second world war, up to the fall of France in June, 1940, was in reality the continuation of the strategic extension begun in 1935. This phase, the consolidation of the European base, was completed with France's surrender. It is completed irreversibly and can no longer be undone whatever the outcome of the succeeding phases of the war, which are really other wars. This consolidation fundamental to the world politics of managerial society, is not going to be dissolved, not even if the present German regime is utterly defeated. The day of a Europe carved into a score of sovereign states is over; if the states remain, they will be little more than administrative units in a larger collectivity. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James Burnham, ''The Managerial Revolution'', Indiana University Press, Bloomingham 1966, pgs. 222-226, 232.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti-Semitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Adolf Hitler]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://econ161.berkeley.edu/TCEH/Slouch_Alternatives12.html Marxism, Fascism, Nazism] - Brad DeLong, Associate Professor of Economics, University of California at Berkeley&lt;br /&gt;
*Hitler, the Holocaust, and the Bible: A Scriptural Analysis of Anti-Semitism, National Socialism, and the Churches in Nazi Germany, by Joe Keysor&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:German History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Parties]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fascist States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nazis]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-Semitism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BenPa</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=765408</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=765408"/>
		<updated>2010-03-27T17:06:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BenPa: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Liberal Brain.jpg|thumb|450px|top|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;A satirical conception of the liberal brain.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (also '''leftist''') is someone who rejects logical and biblical standards, often for self-centered reasons.  There are no coherent liberal standards; often a liberal is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;As one liberal website candidly observes, &amp;quot;Obama is a shallow narcissist, not a believer in any cause higher than himself. Every American president has had a healthy ego, but none has ever been as purely motivated by vanity as the childishly self-loving [[Barack Obama]].&amp;quot;[http://www.opednews.com/articles/Barack-Obama-s-ego-driven-by-Christopher-Calder-091210-804.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]], and in Europe even [[socialist]]ic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and/or legalized [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Censorship]] of teacher-lead [[prayer]] in classrooms and school sponsored events&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of obscenity and pornography as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography. These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Income redistribution]], usually through progressive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-rationed medical care, such as [[Universal Health Care]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and government-controlled [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The denial of inherent [[gender differences]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting that men and women be placed in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Implementation of [[affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of [[labor union]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Teaching acceptance of promiscuity through sexual &amp;quot;education&amp;quot; rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it was intended&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Greenpeace]], for example.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Disarmament treaties]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to an interventionalist American foreign policy &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stefaan Walgrave and Joris Verhulst, [http://nicomedia.math.upatras.gr/conf/CAWM2003/Papers/Verhulst.pdf The February 15 Worldwide Protests against a War in Iraq: An Empirical Test of Transnational Opportunities. Outline of a Research Programme](PDF).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full private property rights&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstating the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals were the most likely supporters of the theory of evolution]]. The theory of [[evolution]] is a key component of [[atheistic]] ideologies in the [[Western World]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Calling anyone they agree with a &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[Barack Obama]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The long romance of Western leftists with some of the bloodiest regimes and political movements in history is a story not told often enough ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.city-journal.org/2009/bc0605bt.html Dupes by Bruce S. Thornton], City Journal - 5 June 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] liberals give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition,  [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=152&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ==&lt;br /&gt;
The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] and the article exposed the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Barack Obama]] has been criticized concerning [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|thumb|right|150px|The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith -- it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism in North America today ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and many media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are often [[liberal]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Some argue that liberals typically support economic policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.alde.eu&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liberal-international.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; such as the Liberal Party of Australia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal.org.au/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and tradition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alternative meanings of 'liberal'==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One definition of liberal is anything that is not conservative.  For example, the American Heritage Dictionary includes this definition of &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
* Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
* National Socialists German Workers Party&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberalism and art]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BenPa</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=765406</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=765406"/>
		<updated>2010-03-27T17:05:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BenPa: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Liberal Brain.jpg|thumb|450px|top|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;A satirical conception of the liberal brain.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (also '''leftist''') is someone who rejects logical and biblical standards, often for self-centered reasons.  There are no coherent liberal standards; often a liberal is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;As one liberal website candidly observes, &amp;quot;Obama is a shallow narcissist, not a believer in any cause higher than himself. Every American president has had a healthy ego, but none has ever been as purely motivated by vanity as the childishly self-loving [[Barack Obama]].&amp;quot;[http://www.opednews.com/articles/Barack-Obama-s-ego-driven-by-Christopher-Calder-091210-804.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]], and in Europe even [[socialist]]ic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and/or legalized [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Censorship]] of teacher-lead [[prayer]] in classrooms and school sponsored events&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of obscenity and pornography as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography. These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Income redistribution]], usually through progressive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-rationed medical care, such as [[Universal Health Care]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and government-controlled [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The denial of inherent [[gender differences]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting that men and women be placed in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Implementation of [[affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of [[labor union]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Teaching acceptance of promiscuity through sexual &amp;quot;education&amp;quot; rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it was intended&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Greenpeace]], for example.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Disarmament treaties]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to an interventionalist American foreign policy &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stefaan Walgrave and Joris Verhulst, [http://nicomedia.math.upatras.gr/conf/CAWM2003/Papers/Verhulst.pdf The February 15 Worldwide Protests against a War in Iraq: An Empirical Test of Transnational Opportunities. Outline of a Research Programme](PDF).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full private property rights&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstating the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals were the most likely supporters of the theory of evolution]]. The theory of [[evolution]] is a key component of [[atheistic]] ideologies in the [[Western World]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Calling anyone they agree with a &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[Barack Obama]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The long romance of Western leftists with some of the bloodiest regimes and political movements in history is a story not told often enough ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.city-journal.org/2009/bc0605bt.html Dupes by Bruce S. Thornton], City Journal - 5 June 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] liberals give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition,  [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=152&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ==&lt;br /&gt;
The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] and the article exposed the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Barack Obama]] has been criticized concerning [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|thumb|right|150px|The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith -- it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism in North America today ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and many media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are often [[liberal]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Some argue that liberals typically support economic policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.alde.eu&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liberal-international.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; such as the Liberal Party of Australia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal.org.au/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and tradition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alternative meanings of 'liberal'==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One definition of liberal is anything that is not conservative.  For example, the American Heritage Dictionary includes this definition of &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
* Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
* National Socialists&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberalism and art]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BenPa</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_values&amp;diff=765405</id>
		<title>Conservative values</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_values&amp;diff=765405"/>
		<updated>2010-03-27T17:03:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BenPa: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Conservative values''' recognize the adversarial nature of politics, and much in life.  As a result of their ability to deal with adversity, '''conservative values''' are superb in defending against obesity,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[conservative]] [[Mike Huckabee]] losing 110 pounds.[http://www.newsweek.com/id/51663]; relatively few [[conservatives]] are overweight.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; addiction,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Conservative principles prohibit addictive drugs, pornography and gambling, and favor [[Rule of Law]] to prohibit underage drinking and smoking, when those addictions form.  An example of a [[conservative]] who conquered alcoholism is President [[George W. Bush]]. [[Rush Limbaugh]] also conquered his addiction to [[OxyContin]].  &lt;br /&gt;
A study shows that typically [[liberal]] college students live in an environment that &amp;quot;allows for a lifestyle that essentially extends the adolescent period,&amp;quot; resulting in higher &amp;quot;drinking,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;property theft,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;unstructured socializing with friends&amp;quot; compared with peers who do not go to college. [http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/college-students-behaving-badly/  NY Times: &amp;quot;College Students Behaving Badly&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; adversity,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Conservative principles fully support [[self-defense]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; anxiety,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Liberal teenagers always felt more stress than conservatives ....,&amp;quot; according to one study summarized in ''The Economist''. [http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10717915]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; fear,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;An example of a [[conservative]] who overcame a difficult is fear is President [[Ronald Reagan]], who conquered a longtime fear of flying.[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CEED7123CF93AA1575AC0A967958260]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; depression, narcissism,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Hollywood values]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; risky law-breaking activities like dangerous driving,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Conservatives]] accept and teach respect for [[Rule of Law]], and this deters dangerous driving, particularly by teenagers, that can tragically end in death.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; self-destructive behavior, illiteracy,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Conservatives]] emphasize learning to read by [[phonics]], rather than the ineffective memorization approach of [[liberals]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; rejection, wastefulness, and serious mental disorders.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;While 58 percent of Republicans reported having excellent mental health, only 38 percent of Democrats described themselves that way.&amp;quot;[http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=57683]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Conservatives]] are happier than [[liberal]]s, and one study gives a [[reason]]: conservatives do not insist upon a [[mindless equality]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Research suggests that highly egalitarian women are less happy in their marriages compared with their more traditional counterparts, apparently because they are more troubled by disparities in domestic labor.&amp;quot;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,354424,00.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Conservative values''' are also helpful in recognizing and combating [[deceit]].  A [[conservative]] understands the many incentives by others to engage in [[deceit]], and the political power that can result from such [[deceit]].  A [[conservative]] is often not surprised by the deception that fools others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Conservative values''' include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* placing ideas and principles above personal desire, weaknesses, fears and regrets&lt;br /&gt;
* a never-ending quest for the truth, despite obstacles based on emotion and personal experience, and spreading such truths for the benefit of all&lt;br /&gt;
* recognizing and utilizing the benefits of competition and hard work&lt;br /&gt;
* emphasizing [[charity]], with its unexpected benefits, rather than compulsory tax-and-spend programs&lt;br /&gt;
* teaching [[self-help]] rather than dependence on government and others&lt;br /&gt;
* a devotion to the principle of [[justice]]&lt;br /&gt;
* supporting [[self-defense]]&lt;br /&gt;
* recognizing the [[media]] for its [[liberal bias|bias]], [[media bullying|bullying]], deception.&lt;br /&gt;
* frugality and efficiency&lt;br /&gt;
* rejecting the deification of government officials&lt;br /&gt;
* giving those in authority due respect, but not to the point of accepting orders or assertions that are contrary to logic or morality&lt;br /&gt;
* downplaying significance of wealth, disparities in wealth, and materialism in general&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.,'' the [[Coase Theorem]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* emphasizing self-reliance and being able to keep the fruits of one's labor&lt;br /&gt;
* not complaining, and instead taking practical action to improve one's situation&lt;br /&gt;
* emphasizing self-restraint against hurtful activities&lt;br /&gt;
* emphasizing humility and open-mindedness instead of arrogant certainty about one's own views&lt;br /&gt;
* recognizing the power of the [[free market]]&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding that a rising tide lifts all boats, e.g. tax cuts benefit all.&lt;br /&gt;
* self-control as opposed to a self-indulgent search for instant gratification of desires.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Conservative values''' are useful and powerful in combating common human weaknesses:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lust]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sloth (sin)|Laziness ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Envy|Jealousy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gluttony]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pride]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Conflict&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Corruption]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Credulity&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberalism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Conservative Benefits]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William F. Buckley]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Virtues]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BenPa</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Oath_of_Hippocrates&amp;diff=765395</id>
		<title>Oath of Hippocrates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Oath_of_Hippocrates&amp;diff=765395"/>
		<updated>2010-03-27T16:05:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BenPa: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Oath of Hippocrates''' or '''Hippocratic Oath''' is an oath traditionally taken by doctors setting down certain guidelines about how they will use their medical skills. The oath dates back to ancient Greece but it is uncertain if it is actually due to [[Hippocrates]].  Taking the oath is not a requirement to practice medicine, and has no legal status.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Translation of the Classical Oath ==&lt;br /&gt;
I SWEAR by Apollo the physician and Æsculapius, and Health, and All-heal, and all the gods and goddesses, that, according to my ability and judgment,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will keep this Oath and this stipulation — to reckon him who taught me this Art equally dear to me as my parents, to share my substance with him, and relieve his necessities if required; to look upon his offspring in the same footing as my own brothers, and to teach them this art, if they shall wish to learn it, without fee or stipulation; and that by precept, lecture and every other mode of instruction,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will impart a knowledge of the Art to my own sons, and those of my teachers, and to disciples bound by a stipulation and oath according to the law of medicine, but to none others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will follow that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel; and in like manner I will not give to a woman a pessary to produce abortion. With purity and with holiness I will pass my life and practice my Art.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not cut persons laboring under the stone, but will leave this to be done by men who are practitioners of this work. Into whatever houses I enter, I will go into them for the benefit of the sick, and will abstain from every voluntary act of mischief and corruption; and, further, from the seduction of females or males, of freemen and slaves. Whatever, in connection with my professional service, or not in connection with it, I see or hear, in the life of men, which ought not to be spoken of abroad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not divulge, as reckoning that all such should be kept secret. While I continue to keep this Oath unviolated, may it be granted to me to enjoy life and the practice of the art, respected by all men, in all times. But should I trespass and violate this Oath, may the reverse be my lot.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/hippocrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism of the oath==&lt;br /&gt;
The oath requires a doctor to swear on the names of [[Apollo (mythology)|Apollo]], [[Æsculapius]], and all the &amp;quot;gods&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;goddesses&amp;quot; of the [[Pagan]] Greek pantheon. Since this oath contradicts fundamental Christian principles by requiring a Christian to swear by Pagan gods, devout Christian doctors may refuse to take this oath.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Oath in Modern Times ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to pressure from [[abortionists]] and promoters of [[abortion]], many medical schools now drop the prohibition on abortion and [[euthanasia]] from &amp;quot;modernized&amp;quot; versions of the Oath.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_19970328/ai_n14096334&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/doctors/oath_today.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cmdahome.org/index.cgi?CONTEXT=art&amp;amp;art=313&amp;amp;cat=100102&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Deciet and the Oath==&lt;br /&gt;
Because their overwhelming tendency towards deciet liberal doctors should not be trusted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BenPa</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Oath_of_Hippocrates&amp;diff=765394</id>
		<title>Oath of Hippocrates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Oath_of_Hippocrates&amp;diff=765394"/>
		<updated>2010-03-27T16:04:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BenPa: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Oath of Hippocrates''' or '''Hippocratic Oath''' is an oath traditionally taken by doctors setting down certain guidelines about how they will use their medical skills. The oath dates back to ancient Greece but it is uncertain if it is actually due to [[Hippocrates]].  Taking the oath is not a requirement to practice medicine, and has no legal status.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Translation of the Classical Oath ==&lt;br /&gt;
I SWEAR by Apollo the physician and Æsculapius, and Health, and All-heal, and all the gods and goddesses, that, according to my ability and judgment,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will keep this Oath and this stipulation — to reckon him who taught me this Art equally dear to me as my parents, to share my substance with him, and relieve his necessities if required; to look upon his offspring in the same footing as my own brothers, and to teach them this art, if they shall wish to learn it, without fee or stipulation; and that by precept, lecture and every other mode of instruction,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will impart a knowledge of the Art to my own sons, and those of my teachers, and to disciples bound by a stipulation and oath according to the law of medicine, but to none others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will follow that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel; and in like manner I will not give to a woman a pessary to produce abortion. With purity and with holiness I will pass my life and practice my Art.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not cut persons laboring under the stone, but will leave this to be done by men who are practitioners of this work. Into whatever houses I enter, I will go into them for the benefit of the sick, and will abstain from every voluntary act of mischief and corruption; and, further, from the seduction of females or males, of freemen and slaves. Whatever, in connection with my professional service, or not in connection with it, I see or hear, in the life of men, which ought not to be spoken of abroad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not divulge, as reckoning that all such should be kept secret. While I continue to keep this Oath unviolated, may it be granted to me to enjoy life and the practice of the art, respected by all men, in all times. But should I trespass and violate this Oath, may the reverse be my lot.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/hippocrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism of the oath==&lt;br /&gt;
The oath requires a doctor to swear on the names of [[Apollo (mythology)|Apollo]], [[Æsculapius]], and all the &amp;quot;gods&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;goddesses&amp;quot; of the [[Pagan]] Greek pantheon. Since this oath contradicts fundamental Christian principles by requiring a Christian to swear by Pagan gods, devout Christian doctors may refuse to take this oath.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Oath in Modern Times ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to pressure from [[abortionists]] and promoters of [[abortion]], many medical schools now drop the prohibition on abortion and [[euthanasia]] from &amp;quot;modernized&amp;quot; versions of the Oath.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_19970328/ai_n14096334&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/doctors/oath_today.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cmdahome.org/index.cgi?CONTEXT=art&amp;amp;art=313&amp;amp;cat=100102&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Deciet and the Oath==&lt;br /&gt;
Because their overwhelming tendency toward deciet liberal doctors should not be trusted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BenPa</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>