<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Barclay</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Barclay"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Barclay"/>
	<updated>2026-10-01T05:38:34Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Phelps&amp;diff=845821</id>
		<title>Fred Phelps</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Phelps&amp;diff=845821"/>
		<updated>2011-02-02T21:26:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Undo revision 840502 by RevJohnMarco (talk). Remove bizarre speculation by banned user.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Phelps.jpg|right|thumb|Fred Phelps giving an interview in 2000]]'''Fred Waldron Phelps''' is [[pastor]] of the independent [[Westboro Baptist Church]], an extremist organization not affiliated with mainstream [[Baptist]] churches, and is a controversial activist against [[homosexual]] behavior. Phelps is noted for rallies displaying signs with highly inflammatory and [[extremist]] statements. This has classified the church as a hate group by the radical [[leftist]] [[Southern Poverty Law Center]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.buffalonews.com/258/story/586891.html Counterdemonstrators drive off hate group in Flight 3407 protest] The Buffalo News, February 22, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He is said to hold a &amp;quot;[[Hyper-Calvinism|hyper-Calvinistic]] viewpoint&amp;quot; generally regarded as far outside of mainstream Christianity by most Christian scholars.  Most of the congregants of the Westboro Baptist Church, which is located in [[Topeka]], [[Kansas]], are related to Phelps either by blood or marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has openly denounced the [[Catholic Church]] and [[Episcopal Church]] and has made claims these religious organizations tolerate and harbor homosexuals and pedophiles. He has also referred to a variety of political figures as &amp;quot;fag-enablers&amp;quot;, ranging from Republican Presidents [[Ronald Reagan]]. [[George W. Bush]] to Democrats such as [[Howard Dean]]. Phelps is a vehement critic of [[Dick Cheney]]. [http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-8194338250744686470&amp;amp;q#] His views are rejected by the majority of [[conservative]] [[Christian]]s; [[evangelical]] leader [[Jerry Falwell]] referred to him as a &amp;quot;first-class nut&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cjonline.com/webindepth/phelps/stories/102498_protests.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has led protests at military funerals based on his belief that America is a country that harbors homosexuals and is thus evil. As a result, President [[George W. Bush]] signed the Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act, which places limitations on protests at military funerals. These demonstrations led to the formation of the [[Patriot Guard]], an organization of motorcyclists who attend military funerals in order to shield the families of the deceased from the protests by members of Phelps's Westboro Baptist Church.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-09-13-funeral-protests_x.htm Funeral protesters say laws can't silence them], By Charlie Riedel, Associated Press, July 2006.  Retrieved from USA Today October 14, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Phelps is being represented by the [[ACLU]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/22/AR2006072200643.html ACLU Sues for Anti-Gay Group That Pickets at Troops' Burials], By Garance Burke, Associated Press, July 23, 2006; Page A02. Retrieved from the ''[[Washington Post]]'' October 14, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has been an active contributor to the [[Democratic Party]] and was enthusiastic supporter of [[Al Gore]] for President in 1988.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/1999/03/lauerman.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Phelps's son, Fred Phelps, Jr., also served as a delegate for Gore. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=15559&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has since changed his opinion about Gore when he joined [[Bill Clinton]] on the 1992 presidential ticket.  Phelps turned on him and claimed Gore was a conservative icon of the Democratic Party that sold out on some critical social issues.  Phelps also demonstrated against Clinton and Gore during the 1997 inaugural. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={91058469-F6DE-4615-8B2A-73CDF3E8FCAC}  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4179/is_20001104/ai_n11753681 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps' Criticism of Religious Leaders ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps runs several websites on the Internet which preach against [[homosexuality]] and immoral living.  Phelps espouses a skewed version of his own &amp;quot;literal&amp;quot; interpretation of the [[Bible]] and the holy scriptures, and speaks against mainstream religious and Christian leaders who in his view, distort or twist the literal interpretation of the Bible.  Phelps also speaks for greater accountability for religious organizations, such as the Catholic Church, and has been vocal in the press and media concerning the abuse of young boys by Catholic Priests and Church Leaders, and practicing homosexuals in the Episcopal Church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps and Democrat politics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps ran for governor of [[Kansas]] as a [[Democrat]] in 1990, 1994, and 1998.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ref4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://edition.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/08/05/kansas.results/ 1998 Kansas Primary Results. Compiled by Congressional Quarterly.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Phelps received 31% of the vote in Kansas's 1992 Democratic Party primary for [[U.S. Senate]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kssos.org/elections/elections_statistics.html State of Kansas Secretary of State Website]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1993 Phelps ran for mayor of [[Topeka]]. and 1997. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21229 The &amp;quot;God Hates Fags&amp;quot; [[Left]]],  By Mark D. Tooley, FrontPageMagazine.com, February 09, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.religionnewsblog.com/1128/kansas-anti-gay-church-embarrasses-topekans Kansas anti-gay church embarrasses Topekans], November 7, 2002. Retrieved from ReligionNewsBlog.com, October 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He supported [[Al Gore]] in the 1988 primaries. Phelps has been a vocal criric of former Vice President [[Dick Cheney]] and his whole family saying, &amp;quot;They know the iniquity they’ve wrought, but they’re not at all ashamed of it...God hates the Cheneys.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8194338250744686470#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps and Saddam Hussein ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1997, upset about [[United States]] sanctions on [[Iraq]], Phelps wrote a letter to [[Saddam Hussein]] that read, in part, ''We understand that Iraq is the only Muslim state that allows the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ to be freely and openly preached on the streets without fear of arrest and prosecution. Alas, the United States no longer allows the Gospel to be freely and openly preached on the streets, because militant sodomites now control our government, and they violently object to the Bible message.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adl.org/special_reports/wbc/wbc_on_america.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He requested, and received, permission from Hussein to protest  in Iraq. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={91058469-F6DE-4615-8B2A-73CDF3E8FCAC}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lawsuits and Litigation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Phelps and his congregation were recently sued by Albert Snyder, the father of a soldier killed in Iraq. Phelps and his congregation protested the Iraq War at his son's funeral. The father sued for defamation over Phelps' statement: &amp;quot;Mr. Snyder raised his son for the devil and hell,&amp;quot; during the funeral protest and in statements on his website.  A federal jury in Baltimore awarded him nearly $11 million in a verdict against the church; Mr. Snyder won on every count of his complaint, receiving $2.9 million for compensatory damages and $8 million for punitive damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Phelps has also been threatened with prosecution by the Canadian Government for alleged hate speech in Canada for preaching what he has stated are the literal teachings of the Bible against homosexuality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=15559 Gore sought help from anti-homosexual group], 'God hates fags' creator preaches 'hate because the Bible preaches hate', By Jon E. Dougherty, ''WorldNetDaily.com'', October 25, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Already picketing daily in Topeka, the Phelpses began to shower faxes on the community, targeting business and political leaders they disagreed with. After Topeka councilwoman Beth Mechler publicly doubted Phelps' claims that wild [[gay sex]] was occurring in Gage Park, Phelps responded with an insulting fax.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism of Phelps==&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has been criticized by a great number of individuals, both conservative and liberal. For example, [[Jerry Falwell]]  referred to Phelps as &amp;quot;a first class nut&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cjonline.com/webindepth/phelps/stories/102498_protests.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Illinois Family Institute Executive Director Peter LaBarbera said &amp;quot;Fred Phelps' curious message is hardly Christian, and only fuels societal bigotry toward those who espouse genuine Biblical views on social issues like homosexuality and abortion,&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eleventh-avenue-south.com/archives/2005/08/fred_phelps_a_p.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps was also cited during Canadian deliberations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/dec/07121806.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; about declaring anti-gay sentiments to be a hate crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Westboro Baptist also is monitored by the Anti-Defamation League.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pickets ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1f3.jpg|right|thumb|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps announced that he and his group would picket the funeral service of actor [[Heath Ledger]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2009, Phelps' group announced that they would travel to the [[United Kingdom]] to protest in [[Basingstoke]] against a gay-themed play called [[The Laramie Project]], based on the murder of [[Matthew Shepard]]. &lt;br /&gt;
However, the British Foreign Secretary [[Jacqui Smith]] later announced on February 19th that they would be barred from entering the country as the group &amp;quot;engaged in unacceptable behaviour by inciting hatred against a number of communities&amp;quot;. Phelps' group later responded with a message on their website GodHatesFags.com stating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;You British Bastards will not have Jesus Christ to rule over you, and think you can issue bans and pass laws to remove God’s word from the landscape. You do greatly err, not knowing the power of God; and, you do that against your own interests. It is a great kindness to have God’s prophets in your land. But, you ungrateful brutes despise knowledge. It is too late for the UK. God Hates You! God’s wrath and destruction is all that’s left for you, thanks to Secretary Smith.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-11226.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite efforts by [[leftist]]s to link Phelps to the Religious Right, Phelps refers to Christian conservatives as &amp;quot;People who have gone a whoring after strange gods.&amp;quot;  Phelps preaching has much in common with the Reverend [[Jeremiah Wright]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Outside links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://blank.org/addict/ Addicted to Hate: the story of Fred Phelps]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOrz5k0jWdU The Most Hated Family In America]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8194338250744686470# Fred Phelps' Unhinged Video Message to the Cheneys]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.adl.org/poisoning_web/homophobia.asp Poisoning the Web: Hatred Online], Anti-Defamation League (2001). Retrieved 05/23/07. &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.godhatesfredphelps.com/ God Hates Fred Phelps], Retrieved from http://www.godhatesfredphelps.com/ October 25, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8682089528957352638&amp;amp;ei=YB-PSa6HCYbi2gKtgPnCCw&amp;amp;q=fred+phelps+jerry+falwell&amp;amp;hl=en Phelps denouncing] [[Jerry Falwell]] after his death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-war Movements]]	&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Phelps, Fred}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Celsius&amp;diff=845820</id>
		<title>Celsius</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Celsius&amp;diff=845820"/>
		<updated>2011-02-02T21:22:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Clarify equations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Celsius''' scale is used by scientists to measure [[temperature]].  The scale was originally defined such that at standard atmospheric pressure [[water]] freezes at 0 ºC and boils at 100 ºC.  To convert from [[Fahrenheit]] to Celsius take the Fahrenheit temperature, subtract 32 then multiply by 5 and divide by 9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One Celsius degree is equal to one [[Kelvin]], with an offset such that T(°C) = T(K) - 273.15.  So [[absolute zero]], 0 K, (the temperature at which there is no heat) is -273.15 degrees Celsius.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Celsius is the commonly used unit of temperature in Europe, Canada, Mexico, most of Asia, South America, most of Africa and Australia but in the United States, Fahrenheit is still preferred. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/appendix/appendix-g.html] CIA World Factbook&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Centigrade'' is a term commonly used as a synonym of Celsius, especially when giving weather temperature on the air.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conversion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To convert Celsius to and from Fahrenheit, use the following equations: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fahrenheit degrees = (Celsius degrees × 9⁄5) + 32&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Celsius degrees = (Fahrenheit degrees - 32) × 5/9 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Retrieved from &amp;quot;http://www.conservapedia.com/Celsius_scale&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Metric System]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.sizes.com/units/temperature_centigrade.htm Why was the centigrade scale abandoned?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Units of Temperature]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fahrenheit&amp;diff=845818</id>
		<title>Fahrenheit</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fahrenheit&amp;diff=845818"/>
		<updated>2011-02-02T21:16:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Untrue statement removed - see talk page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Fahrenheit''' is the name of the [[temperature]] scale used in the [[United States of America]] for ordinary purposes. It was used in most [[English]]-speaking countries until the 1960s. Most other countries use [[Celsius]] (which was known as Centigrade until 1960), which is part of the ''International System of Units'' (the &amp;quot;[[metric system]]&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fahrenheit temperature scale was invented by [[Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit]] in 1724. He decided that the zero point should be the temperature of a mix of ammonium chloride and ice, because this was the very coldest temperature he could achieve in his laboratory. He decided to set 100 at the temperature of the human body. (Either he made his measurement inaccurately, or he was running a very slight fever at the time). On this scale, it turns out that water freezes at 32 degrees and boils at 212 degrees Fahrenheit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To convert a temperature expressed in Celsius to Fahrenheit, multiply by 9/5 and add 32. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To convert a temperature in Fahrenheit to Celsius, subtract 32 and multiply the result by 5/9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The temperature -40 is the same in both scales.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Units of Temperature]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fahrenheit&amp;diff=845816</id>
		<title>Talk:Fahrenheit</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fahrenheit&amp;diff=845816"/>
		<updated>2011-02-02T21:15:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I removed the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;''[[Fahrenheit 451]],'' the title of a famous science-fiction novel by [[Ray Bradbury]], refers to the temperature at which book paper supposedly burns. (Bradbury is said obtained this figure simply by calling a local fire station on the telephone).&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{fact}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. The novel concerns a dystopian future in which imaginative fiction is considered subversives, and the job of &amp;quot;firemen&amp;quot; is to locate and burn books.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It doesn't belong on this page, but on [[Farenheit 451]], which is where I moved it :) [[User:Jazzman831|Jazzman831]] 14:47, 29 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Removal of untrue statement ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;To convert a temperature in Fahrenheit to Celsius, subtract 32 and multiply the result by 5/9. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The temperature -40 is the same in both scales. This gives an alternative conversion rule: to convert in either direction, first add 40; then multiply by 5/9 for °F-&amp;gt;°C or 9/5 for °C-&amp;gt;°F; then subtract 40.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first paragraph quoted and the first sentence of the second paragraph quoted are true. The second sentence of the second paragraph is not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consider conversion of 100 degrees Fahrenheit into Celsius.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the first calculation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(100-32) * (5/9) = 37.8 degrees Celsius&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the second calculation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(100+40) * (5/9) = 77.8 degrees Celsius&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Body temperature is approx 100 degrees Fahrenheit and approx 38 degrees Celsius. I will remove the untrue part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Barclay|Barclay]] 16:15, 2 February 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Phelps&amp;diff=832980</id>
		<title>Fred Phelps</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Phelps&amp;diff=832980"/>
		<updated>2010-12-17T21:14:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Remove dead link; there are other links regarding Fred Phelps's views about Al Gore.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Phelps.jpg|right|thumb|Fred Phelps giving an interview in 2000]]'''Fred Waldron Phelps''' is [[pastor]] of the independent [[Westboro Baptist Church]], an extremist organization not affiliated with mainstream [[Baptist]] churches, and is a controversial activist against [[homosexual]] behavior. Phelps is noted for rallies displaying signs with highly inflammatory and [[extremist]] statements. This has classified the church as a hate group by the radical [[leftist]] [[Southern Poverty Law Center]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.buffalonews.com/258/story/586891.html Counterdemonstrators drive off hate group in Flight 3407 protest] The Buffalo News, February 22, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He is said to hold a &amp;quot;[[Hyper-Calvinism|hyper-Calvinistic]] viewpoint&amp;quot; generally regarded as far outside of mainstream Christianity by most Christian scholars.  Most of the congregants of the Westboro Baptist Church, which is located in [[Topeka]], [[Kansas]], are related to Phelps either by blood or marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has openly denounced the [[Catholic Church]] and [[Episcopal Church]] and has made claims these religious organizations tolerate and harbor homosexuals and pedophiles. He has also referred to a variety of political figures as &amp;quot;fag-enablers&amp;quot;, ranging from Republican Presidents [[Ronald Reagan]]. [[George W. Bush]] to Democrats such as [[Howard Dean]]. Phelps is a vehement critic of [[Dick Cheney]]. [http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-8194338250744686470&amp;amp;q#] His views are rejected by the majority of [[conservative]] [[Christian]]s; [[evangelical]] leader [[Jerry Falwell]] referred to him as a &amp;quot;first-class nut&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cjonline.com/webindepth/phelps/stories/102498_protests.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has led protests at military funerals based on his belief that America is a country that harbors homosexuals and is thus evil. As a result, President [[George W. Bush]] signed the Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act, which places limitations on protests at military funerals. These demonstrations led to the formation of the [[Patriot Guard]], an organization of motorcyclists who attend military funerals in order to shield the families of the deceased from the protests by members of Phelps's Westboro Baptist Church.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-09-13-funeral-protests_x.htm Funeral protesters say laws can't silence them], By Charlie Riedel, Associated Press, July 2006.  Retrieved from USA Today October 14, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Phelps is being represented by the [[ACLU]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/22/AR2006072200643.html ACLU Sues for Anti-Gay Group That Pickets at Troops' Burials], By Garance Burke, Associated Press, July 23, 2006; Page A02. Retrieved from the ''[[Washington Post]]'' October 14, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has been an active contributor to the [[Democratic Party]] and was enthusiastic supporter of [[Al Gore]] for President in 1988.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/1999/03/lauerman.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Phelps's son, Fred Phelps, Jr., also served as a delegate for Gore. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=15559&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has since changed his opinion about Gore when he joined [[Bill Clinton]] on the 1992 presidential ticket.  Phelps turned on him and claimed Gore was a conservative icon of the Democratic Party that sold out on some critical social issues.  Phelps also demonstrated against Clinton and Gore during the 1997 inaugural. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={91058469-F6DE-4615-8B2A-73CDF3E8FCAC}  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4179/is_20001104/ai_n11753681 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps' Criticism of Religious Leaders ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps runs several websites on the Internet which preach against [[homosexuality]] and immoral living.  Phelps espouses a skewed version of his own &amp;quot;literal&amp;quot; interpretation of the [[Bible]] and the holy scriptures, and speaks against mainstream religious and Christian leaders who in his view, distort or twist the literal interpretation of the Bible.  Phelps also speaks for greater accountability for religious organizations, such as the Catholic Church, and has been vocal in the press and media concerning the abuse of young boys by Catholic Priests and Church Leaders, and practicing homosexuals in the Episcopal Church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps and Democrat politics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps ran for governor of [[Kansas]] as a [[Democrat]] in 1990, 1994, and 1998.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ref4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://edition.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/08/05/kansas.results/ 1998 Kansas Primary Results. Compiled by Congressional Quarterly.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Phelps received 31% of the vote in Kansas's 1992 Democratic Party primary for [[U.S. Senate]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kssos.org/elections/elections_statistics.html State of Kansas Secretary of State Website]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1993 Phelps ran for mayor of [[Topeka]]. and 1997. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21229 The &amp;quot;God Hates Fags&amp;quot; [[Left]]],  By Mark D. Tooley, FrontPageMagazine.com, February 09, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.religionnewsblog.com/1128/kansas-anti-gay-church-embarrasses-topekans Kansas anti-gay church embarrasses Topekans], November 7, 2002. Retrieved from ReligionNewsBlog.com, October 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He supported [[Al Gore]] in the 1988 primaries. Phelps has been a vocal criric of former Vice President [[Dick Cheney]] and his whole family saying, &amp;quot;They know the iniquity they’ve wrought, but they’re not at all ashamed of it...God hates the Cheneys.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8194338250744686470#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps and Saddam Hussein ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1997, upset about [[United States]] sanctions on [[Iraq]], Phelps wrote a letter to [[Saddam Hussein]] that read, in part, ''We understand that Iraq is the only Muslim state that allows the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ to be freely and openly preached on the streets without fear of arrest and prosecution. Alas, the United States no longer allows the Gospel to be freely and openly preached on the streets, because militant sodomites now control our government, and they violently object to the Bible message.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adl.org/special_reports/wbc/wbc_on_america.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He requested, and received, permission from Hussein to protest  in Iraq. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={91058469-F6DE-4615-8B2A-73CDF3E8FCAC}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lawsuits and Litigation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Phelps and his congregation were recently sued by Albert Snyder, the father of a soldier killed in Iraq. Phelps and his congregation protested the Iraq War at his son's funeral. The father sued for defamation over Phelps' statement: &amp;quot;Mr. Snyder raised his son for the devil and hell,&amp;quot; during the funeral protest and in statements on his website.  A federal jury in Baltimore awarded him nearly $11 million in a verdict against the church; Mr. Snyder won on every count of his complaint, receiving $2.9 million for compensatory damages and $8 million for punitive damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Phelps has also been threatened with prosecution by the Canadian Government for alleged hate speech in Canada for preaching what he has stated are the literal teachings of the Bible against homosexuality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=15559 Gore sought help from anti-homosexual group], 'God hates fags' creator preaches 'hate because the Bible preaches hate', By Jon E. Dougherty, ''WorldNetDaily.com'', October 25, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Already picketing daily in Topeka, the Phelpses began to shower faxes on the community, targeting business and political leaders they disagreed with. After Topeka councilwoman Beth Mechler publicly doubted Phelps' claims that wild [[gay sex]] was occurring in Gage Park, Phelps responded with an insulting fax.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism of Phelps==&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has been criticized by a great number of individuals, both conservative and liberal. For example, [[Jerry Falwell]]  referred to Phelps as &amp;quot;a first class nut&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cjonline.com/webindepth/phelps/stories/102498_protests.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Illinois Family Institute Executive Director Peter LaBarbera said &amp;quot;Fred Phelps' curious message is hardly Christian, and only fuels societal bigotry toward those who espouse genuine Biblical views on social issues like homosexuality and abortion,&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eleventh-avenue-south.com/archives/2005/08/fred_phelps_a_p.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps was also cited during Canadian deliberations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/dec/07121806.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; about declaring anti-gay sentiments to be a hate crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Westboro Baptist also is monitored by the Anti-Defamation League.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pickets ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1f3.jpg|right|thumb|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps announced that he and his group would picket the funeral service of actor [[Heath Ledger]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2009, Phelps' group announced that they would travel to the [[United Kingdom]] to protest in [[Basingstoke]] against a gay-themed play called [[The Laramie Project]], based on the murder of [[Matthew Shepard]]. &lt;br /&gt;
However, the British Foreign Secretary [[Jacqui Smith]] later announced on February 19th that they would be barred from entering the country as the group &amp;quot;engaged in unacceptable behaviour by inciting hatred against a number of communities&amp;quot;. Phelps' group later responded with a message on their website GodHatesFags.com stating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;You British Bastards will not have Jesus Christ to rule over you, and think you can issue bans and pass laws to remove God’s word from the landscape. You do greatly err, not knowing the power of God; and, you do that against your own interests. It is a great kindness to have God’s prophets in your land. But, you ungrateful brutes despise knowledge. It is too late for the UK. God Hates You! God’s wrath and destruction is all that’s left for you, thanks to Secretary Smith.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-11226.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite efforts by [[leftist]]s to link Phelps to the Religious Right, Phelps refers to Christian conservatives as &amp;quot;People who have gone a whoring after strange gods.&amp;quot;  Phelps preaching has much in common with the Reverend [[Jeremiah Wright]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Outside links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://blank.org/addict/ Addicted to Hate: the story of Fred Phelps]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOrz5k0jWdU The Most Hated Family In America]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8194338250744686470# Fred Phelps' Unhinged Video Message to the Cheneys]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.adl.org/poisoning_web/homophobia.asp Poisoning the Web: Hatred Online], Anti-Defamation League (2001). Retrieved 05/23/07. &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.godhatesfredphelps.com/ God Hates Fred Phelps], Retrieved from http://www.godhatesfredphelps.com/ October 25, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8682089528957352638&amp;amp;ei=YB-PSa6HCYbi2gKtgPnCCw&amp;amp;q=fred+phelps+jerry+falwell&amp;amp;hl=en Phelps denouncing] [[Jerry Falwell]] after his death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-war Movements]]	&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Phelps, Fred}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fred_Phelps&amp;diff=832978</id>
		<title>Talk:Fred Phelps</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fred_Phelps&amp;diff=832978"/>
		<updated>2010-12-17T21:09:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Remove own edit request - page unprotected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==No linking to Phelps's web sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They are not family appropriate, and Conservapedia is not a repository of hate speech. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:04, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Would it be reasonable to add the prohibition of making and linking to hate speech one of the commandments? --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 17:21, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I think that's an excellent idea. I suggest bringing it up either on Aschlafly's Talk Page or Talk:Conservapedia Commandments. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:22, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: I did not know that I shouldn't have linked to his websites.  However, could you please put into the opening paragraph that Fred Phelps' mission is against homosexuality?  As it is, this important fact is not mentioned until halfway down the page.  [[User:CEinhorn|CEinhorn]] 19:33, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Will do. In fact, I'm going to unprotect this. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 22:55, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely the main authority on Phelps's teachings in Phelps himself? His sites should be linked to. I suggest doing so as plain text, not a clickable link, and alongside a warning notice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Posts not signed are ignored. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:02, 31 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discussion of subject==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to tentatively leave this in place, although it was intended to make Christians look bad by the original creator, he is a major news figure because of his funeral protests, and his actions have prompted major legislation regarding these (and he is also a major embarrassment to my home state, as well as a DEMOCRAT who actually campaigned for Al Gore in 1988 before he went on his anti-homosexual crusade).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I drove by his &amp;quot;church&amp;quot; once and I got a physical chill once I got within two blocks of it. I felt like I was in a place of true evil. Interestingly, the ZIP codes in Topeka, where he lives, all start with 666.  [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 03:26, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Evidently his views changed, judging by his protest of the funeral of Al Gore's father. [[User:RandomishName11|RandomishName11]] 00:42, 18 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just moved it because it was under &amp;quot;Fred phelps,&amp;quot; and the lack of proper capitalization was bothering me. I like to copy edit. :-p [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 03:29, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you looked at the original article as it was written, it contained some crude language. But thanks for working on the capitalization. It bothers me as well when articles are started like that.  [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 03:30, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree with you completely. I didn't want to bother with the article at the time, and I'm glad someone else did. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 03:32, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a more humorous note, [http://www.barzelay.net/files/images/other/phelps.jpg this] was taken outside of Vandy when Phelps came to visit. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 03:52, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw that picture for sale in a liberal store downtown once. It's so funny.&lt;br /&gt;
One of Phelps's lackeys told my friend that his hair was too long once. (I live about 25 miles from Topeka, so we get a lot of him.) [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 03:51, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But everyone knows, Jesus doesn't like long hair... [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 03:52, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This man makes me question the First Amendment, he is just that much of a evil being.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:54, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know. His speech is beyond reasonable and just disgusting. I would guess that a majority of Kansans would support his execution. &lt;br /&gt;
And Colin, you may be thinking of Paul :) [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 03:55, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know the feeling. I'm a huge believer in the importance of the First Amendment, especially free speech, but what he says is just so ridiculous it's hard to believe it's technically allowed. And MD, I was mostly referring to the fact that most men of Jesus' time had &amp;quot;longer&amp;quot; hair. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 04:03, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's what I thought. I don't like to judge other Christians' salvation, but I have to make an exception here for old Freddie. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 04:05, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: OK, I saw you reverted the article back after I added content about the extent of his hate speach.  There needs away for this to be stated, especially if you are going to allow the b.s. about militant homosexuals on the page.  Otherwise this article makes him come across as less insane than he is.--[[User:Jack|Jack]] 18:04, 18 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree. I just don't think that the word &amp;quot;fag&amp;quot; is appropriate for an article on this site. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 20:05, 18 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: The hate crimes against Fred Phelps section is uncited b.s. and I think it should be deleted unless someone can give any evidence beyond Phelps' own paranoia and delusional rantings.  I'm doing you a favor--Fred Phelps is not your friend. --[[User:Jack|Jack]] 11:02, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I'm also taking out the Al Gore contributions part since that isn't cited either. --[[User:Jack|Jack]] 11:04, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal Edits by Jack ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
please push your liberal views in an article about yourself.  This article is about Fred Phelps views, not yours. [[User:RightWolf2|RightWolf2]] 13:01, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Ummmm, liberal views? You say that as if it was a bad thing.  One of the commandments here is that claims need to be properly sourced.  This article is certainly making a lot of excuses regarding one of the most abhorrant men in America today.  He goes to military funerals with signs that say &amp;quot;God Hates F*gs&amp;quot;.  That is an objective, well documented fact.  However, the sysops delete it from the main page.  However, completely unsubstantiated claims by Phelps that HE is the victim of hate crimes is allowed to be left up.  --[[User:Jack|Jack]] 22:05, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The subject of an article and their public statements are reliable sources for an article.   Phelps is preaching the literal statements of the Bible.  In fact, he is at the most extreme end of the spectrum with the limits of free speech I have ever seen.   The article is about his views and him.   And he is certainly notable. [[User:RightWolf2|RightWolf2]] 22:16, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::RightWolf2, please stop editing the article to claim that Phelps is &amp;quot;literally following the Bible&amp;quot;, and please stop attacking Jack.  [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 02:36, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::1.  Not an attack, but a statement of my views.  2. When admins and their buddies start forming cabals to reinforce each other, free editing goes out the window.  3.  I am over 60 years old, I am a competent attorney, and I am not here to rain on anyones parade.  Just to add God's word.  4.  Your views of Phelps are &amp;quot;your views&amp;quot;.  Articles about subjects as controversial as phelps should enshrine &amp;quot;his views&amp;quot;, not everyone elses opinions. [[User:RightWolf2|RightWolf2]] 11:44, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Landover Baptist==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is Fred Phelps' church the inspiration for the Landover Baptist Church website that mocks Christian Extremism?--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 15:57, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:53, 22 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Phelps, although outspoken and outlandish, is far less of a hypocrite than other Christian organizations who claim to be able to determine which verses from the Bible are literal from those that are allegorical.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wow. QED. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 02:19, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With all respect to the fact that it shouldn't be stated on an encyclopedia, Phelps probably is going to Hell. -'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#007FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ames&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 00:42, 31 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Phelps is PRO-FAMILY, not anti-homosexual==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's a reason Dr. Dobson called his institution &amp;quot;Focus on the Family&amp;quot; and not &amp;quot;We Hate Gays&amp;quot;.  There's a reason that it's called the &amp;quot;Family Research Council&amp;quot;.  The people who oppose the homosexual agenda are PRO-FAMILY, not anti-anything.  Even the mainstream media generally recognizes this fact and ignore the moonbats (just like they ignore the moonbats when the moonbats try to label &amp;quot;PRO-lifers&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;ANTI-choicers&amp;quot;).  Even the mainstream media (which has been proven to be overwhelmingly liberal, remember) doesn't call Dr. Dobson a bigot or a homophobe.  So why shouldn't Conservapedia, which was created to espouse the CONSERVATIVE point of view, reflect what even liberals acknowledge?--[[User:Ashens|Ashens]] 02:38, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps isn't a true conservative. He says Bush is going to burn in hell. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 02:39, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Jeeze, conservatives aren't brainless clones who can't disagree!  I strongly disagree with Phelps on this matter, but that doesn't make him a non-conservative!  Besides, the issue isn't whether or not he's conservative, the issue is his PRO-FAMILY &amp;quot;bias&amp;quot;!--[[User:Ashens|Ashens]] 02:46, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*My reading of scripture, perhaps not as advanced as some, tells me if we keep judging, which God has said is his alone to do, we will all be burning. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:37, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with Terry, but as I've learned from much debating with christians, the argument doesn't work. They've chosen to ignore one thing the bible says in order to use another thing the bible says to achieve their goals or to justify their hate.[[User:Nsmyth|NSmyth]] 04:47, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Well, really, in the Grand Scheme of things, it isn't important.  All of us, eventually, will face the harshest, yet most loving Judge in the Universe.  Justifications, and legal arguments won't be allowed, lol. ;-) --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:50, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You can be anti homosexual without being pro-family. The cult Phelps has developed targets and belittles families, he is truely a Bad person in every sense of the word, if he has gotten anything right it has been by way of accident [[User:Opcn|Opcn]] 01:44, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being anti-homosexual is not being pro-family.  It is being pro-YOUR-idea-of-family, and forcing that idea on the rest of the world.  There's a big difference.-'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#007FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ames&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:47, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps is not pro-family, he's pro-hate. There's a difference. His websites are not family-friendly, his sermons are not, nor are his &amp;quot;hymns&amp;quot;, and neither are his images. --[[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:54, 7 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What does Phelps stand for, _besides_ hating gays?  That seems to be his one schtick. And by all accounts, he psychologically and physically abused his OWN family, which doesn't sound too 'pro-family' to me.  [http://blank.org/addict/] (Court evidence--not for the weak of stomach.)  --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 07:56, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If what you say is true, then &amp;quot;pro-family&amp;quot; must oppose homosexuals becasue they asume that homosexuals are &amp;quot;anti-family&amp;quot;. That is not true, it's not the desire of homosexual people to wreck family, they just want personal freedom to have the kind of living arangement they choose. The only reason they have gathered together is because it's their common cause to get that freedom for themselves. I'm pretty certain that if they had those rights, they would leave everyone else alone. &lt;br /&gt;
Homosexuals don't suggest that everyone should be homosexual, that would be stupid, they just want the right to live their lives as they want to, not bothering anyone, and not being bothered by anyone. If God (if he exists) dislikes it it's solely up to him to judge, none of us are entitled to do that. --[[User:Atkins|Atkins]] 23:45, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems that whoever said that in the first place was being a parodist. We definitely don't stand for Phelps's hate here in Kansas, or here at Conservapedia. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:50, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What the #$@% ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page mention nothing about the sick twisted and evil nature of Fred Phelps and his family cult. I don't know how this site can call itself conservative and not utterly denounce someone who celebrates the deaths of our fighting men and women and taunts the families of our brave departed soldiers. I am disgusted that he gets off with one line of criticism. [[User:Opcn|Opcn]] 01:41, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Opcn, I believe the principle at work here is &amp;quot;The Enemy Of My Enemy Is My Friend.&amp;quot;  Which is a very long way from &amp;quot;Love thine enemies&amp;quot; but that was just some liberal claptrap from about 33 AD or so.  [[User:Teresita|Banned User Teresita]] 01:50, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps and Religion == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It's hard to be religious when certain people aren't incinerated by bolts of lightning.&amp;quot; -- Calvin.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 07:46, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== disgusting liberal bias  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
this article is terribly condemning of this man. this is the same kind of p.c. bias crap that made me sick of wikipedia. mr. phelps believes in the same things we all do, so why is this article against hihm? he only believes in the things that jesus taught1!1[[User:Manifestdestiny|Manifestdestiny]] 18:42, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Wrong.  At no time did Jesus ever condemn a soldier, unlike this man.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 18:49, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::but jesus did condemn homosexuals. [[User:Cryingeagles39|Cryingeagles39]] 12:51, 5 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Jesus told everyone in plain terms that if they continued to sin, they would not inherit the Kingdom of Heaven.  His message in the Gospels was that everyone should repent.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:06, 5 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Exactly. Jesus never specifically mentioned homosexuality in the gospels, but he did do what Karajou mentioned, which would encompass all types of sin, including homosexuality.  [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:20, 5 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I do know Jesus commanded that we not judge, or we would be.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:12, 25 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== God Hates Canada ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Didn't Phelps also light a flag on fire in the middle of an airport, thus causing his arrest? [[User:Kazumaru|Kazumaru]] 18:44, 13 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I haven't heard about this! Do you have a link? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:44, 13 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.holysmoke.org/hs02/phelps3.htm] is the best I can find. I was wrong, I guess. Seems he didn't actually get around to torching the flag. [[User:Kazumaru|Kazumaru]] 19:03, 13 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nevermind... &amp;quot;When WBC members did in fact actually burn the Canadian flag in religious protest to Canada's approval of same-sex marriage, the so-called Christians of Canada were the loudest in denouncing WBC and &amp;quot;widely reviling&amp;quot; her Gospel message.&amp;quot; That's from his God Hates Canada page. Appears I was mistaken about the airport thing, though. [[User:Kazumaru|Kazumaru]] 19:09, 13 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps And The Democratic Party ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone please get rid of this header at the bottom of the page? Seems a bit of a stretch to me. --[[User:Ouzo|Ouzo]] 14:35, 11 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think we've addressed your concerns. [http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={91058469-F6DE-4615-8B2A-73CDF3E8FCAC} The &amp;quot;God Hates Fags&amp;quot; Left].  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:06, 11 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Activist!???==&lt;br /&gt;
Last time I checked liberals support gay people and are secular. Calling Fred Phelps a liberal would be akin to calling Osama bin Laden a pacifist. Someone should change this --[[User:AllahuAkbarJihad|AllahuAkbarJihad]] 21:50, 12 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps is not a leftist, he is on the extreme fringes of the religious right, he's an embarrasment to conservatives so he is called a &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;. I can't believe how biased this website is --[[User:AllahuAkbarJihad|AllahuAkbarJihad]] 21:53, 12 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps celebrated the 9/11 attacks and the more recent al-Qaeda strikes in London as the just recompense of Western decadence. He supported Saddam Hussein and has been appreciative to Fidel Castro. Phelps is probably more appropriately described in psychiatric than political terms. '''But his political roots are in the Democratic Party, having run for office in Kansas five times, and actively supported Al Gore in 1988 and 1992, whose campaign used Phelps’ family office space. Son Fred Phelps Jr., who had hosted a fund raiser for Gore, attended the 1993 Clinton-Gore inaugural.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More careful media coverage acknowledges that Phelps’ ostensibly Baptist church is &amp;quot;unaffiliated&amp;quot; and comprised of only his family members, whose compound of houses is assembled around the church and its swimming pool used for baptisms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps, now age 76, has demonstrated outside the Bush Ranch in Crawford, Texas. He has demonstrated against conservative religious activists James Dobson, Jerry Falwell, and Pat Robertson. He has demonstrated against the Southern Baptist Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:41, 13 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if Phelps did support the Democrats at one time, that doesn't make him a liberal. Guiliani is a Republican and he is certainly not a Conservative (pro gay marriage, pro abortion). I'd argue that Phelps is delusional rather than liberal or conservative but I think it is terribly biased and incorrect to state that he is a leftist and a liberal. Liberals tend to be secular and pro gay marriage, Phelps does not embrace liberal values --[[User:Fredphelpsisamoron|Fredphelpsisamoron]] 16:17, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would argue that Phelps is actually a conservative. He is against gay marriage and is very religious, these are two traits of conservatives. --[[User:MichaelM|MichaelM]] 16:44, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I don't buy it sounds more like an anti liberal rant, and is the sort of statement which will atract vandals to this site. Liberals didn't support Saddam, I mean some might of, they just didn't support the war in Iraq, ! [[User:Tubesock|Tubesock]] 17:35, 19 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There is more to conservatism than ONE ISSUE. Economics, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, there are religious liberals out there. Ever heard of Jimmy Carter? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:45, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
True, but Jimmy Carter is only moderatly oppposed to homosexuality and believes in evolution, he is not the same hate filled bigot that Phelps is. Maybe Phelps isn't conservative, but he certainly isn't liberal either. I think saying Phelps is a leftist is POV pushing. It should be taken out. --[[User:MichaelM|MichaelM]] 16:47, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, wait, wait. What does evolution have to do with it? We've had a lot of liberals tell us that we should not be politicizing science. I actually agree with that. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:51, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps doesn't believe in evolution and he believes in creationism. Creationism, particularly YEC is associated with conservatism. I agree that science shouldn't be politicized but creationists, especially YEC, tend to be conservative while evolutionists tend to be moderate or liberal. --[[User:MichaelM|MichaelM]] 16:53, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::OK. So we have evidence liberals may be open minded and tolerant of other views.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:14, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::*There is no such thing, outside of perhaps Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi as 100% Liberals. Guiliani, I might chime in, isn't taking a &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; stance on some issues, but a old line conservative POV, pre-neoconservative, more Libertarian stance. Many of Phelps' idealogical pronouncements most certainly do fit more within the secular-progressive tent than the conservative one.  And one must note there wasn't any repudiation on the part of Citizen Gore when he was happily taking Phelps &amp;amp; Company money and office space, was there? End of argument there.  Point is, Phelps is almost certainly a Demon from Hell. He certainly isn't worthy of anyone's defense, or the attention he is getting.  --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:47, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think any of Phelps stances fit liberalism at all. The use of liberal and leftist is misleading and biased --[[User:JimmyR|JimmyR]] 20:29, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just because he opposes Bush and conservatives doesn't mean that he isn't one of them. Conservatives, like Liberals can have disagreements among one another and are not one monolithic block. Besides Ronald Reagan supported Saddam in the 80s, does that make him a liberal? I think you should take out &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;liberal activist&amp;quot; it is terribly biased and misleading and just makes Conservapedia look bad --[[User:BillCasey|BillCasey]] 10:19, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree.  Phelps is no more a liberal activist than the KKK is a conservative action group. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 11:54, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Exactly, Phelps has been criticized across the political spectrum from leftist gay rights groups to conservative Christians, he is neither liberal or conservative, he is just plain nuts --[[User:BillCasey|BillCasey]] 17:55, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:ok, we know the 'ol &amp;quot;he's a bad guy so he must be a religious conservative&amp;quot; argument is the basis of many Wikipedia articles, and thousands of other websites.  But this is CP, we're basically (1) concerned with facts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, Phelps, a creationist, is an example of a broadminded [[leftist]].  What's wrong with that?  Although some of his views are extraordinarily repugnant, Al &amp;amp; Tipper, in keeping with thier one time advocacy of censoring [[music]] content and being pro-[[big tabacco]], once courted a constituency there.  Gore only dropped these views when the Clintons put him on the ticket.  Perhaps the [[Nobel Prize]] Committee made the award to the wrong guy.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:15, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Al Gore is not really a leftist. More a flip-flop, his views swing from liberal to conservative depending on how the political wind blows. Besides supporting Gore doesn't automatically make Phelps a liberal. I'm not saying you should say he is a conservative. But liberals/conservatives calling those who are repugnant to both groups the group they disagree with is wrong and biased. Both liberals and conservatives oppose Phelps so he should be called neither. --[[User:BillCasey|BillCasey]] 18:22, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:hmmm, so Phelps is [[mainstream]] or [[centrist]]?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:28, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, he's just an extremist. Like the KKK. --[[User:BillCasey|BillCasey]] 18:34, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Very interesting; on [[political spectrum theory]] I once postulated that the theory was useless, and meaningless.  Perhaps Phelps is an example.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 19:00, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If that is the case then I think the word leftist should be taken out, it is misleading and besides Phelps is usually considered part of the Religious Right, whether that is true or not --[[User:DanielJamesRideout|DanielJamesRideout]] 12:26, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, because the so-called &amp;quot;Religious Right&amp;quot; is unfairly defamed, we should pile on in support of liberal fascist objectives.  ''Wiederlich.''   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:48, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conservatives call him liberal and the liberals call him conservative. He is clearly insane. Liberalism and insanity often go together but here insanity crowds everything else out. [[User:SkipJohnson|SkipJohnson]] 12:54, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism and insanity go together, thats a pretty harsh insult for people who you merely have a political disagreement with? Why so much hate? --[[User:NathanRodgers|NathanRodgers]] 12:57, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If it was not for the '''fact''' of Phelps [[political]] [[activism]], in support of [[political]] candidates, or the [[fact]] Phelps ran for [[political]] office on the ticket of a major [[political party]], we would not be having this discusssion.  But given the [[political]] realities, we can only use Phelps own stated [[political]] affilliations.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:48, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes it is true that Phelps was associated with the Democrats but remember that at one time the Democrats were the &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; party. The Democrats are now supportive or at least tolerant of homosexuals and Phelps has referred to his former friend Al Gore as a &amp;quot;Fag-enabler&amp;quot;. There aren't too many differences between Republicans and Democrats anyways. I think that leftist and liberal activist should be taken out, other than that the article is fine. --[[User:NathanRodgers|NathanRodgers]] 14:48, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You say &amp;quot;was associated.&amp;quot;  We have no basis for that.  It was Al Gore who shifted, not Phelps.  And we have no reason to believe Gore publicly shifted other than [[career opportunism]], not any personal, inner, [[moral]] change in his fundamental beliefs.  Further, we have ample evidence Gore has both consistently, and persistently, been less then ingenuous in his own personal, inner convictions since pursuing a path of personal career opportunism. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:42, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think anyone with a natural mind can see that Phelps openly supports an agenda that is complicated. However, as Rob eloquently sated above, he ran as a [[Democrat]]. This fact is undeniable. Now, if anyone else wants to take issue with that, that's fine, but I would advise that this is a waste of everyone's time and ought to be a bannable offense. The &amp;quot;but but but&amp;quot; crowd needs to grow up and acept that this guy is one of their own. [[User:Mathers|ItMathers]] 17:56, 19 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Lj105.jpg|thumb|250px|right|According to liberal authors, Fred Phelps &amp;quot;self-identifies as a Democrat.&amp;quot; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm not sure it's quite as simple as that, Mathers. As I understand it, membership of either the Republican or Democrat Party in the States requires no specific ideology and often is simply a matter of publically stating your preference. As Stephen Colbert demonstrated recently, it's even possible to be a member of both! It's a bit of a stretch then to say that Democrats en masse (or liberals, for that matter) consider him 'one of their own'. It might be more accurate to say that Phelps &amp;quot;self-identifies as a Democrat&amp;quot;, and elsewhere in the article that &amp;quot;Phelps has been criticized by conservatives and liberals alike&amp;quot;. Is there any way we can modify the page to reflect this? [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 23:23, 7 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Very funny. Seriously though guys, could an admin modify the text? I imagine it'd save a lot of bickering on this Talk page. [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 23:23, 11 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Very well said, Mathers!  --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:33, 19 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:*I don't understand why libs have trouble with the idea that libs hate; seems to be an everyday occurance.  I've experienced it daily for 40 years.  Look at Ann Coulter.  Libs cannot restrain spewing their hatred toward her.  Or Rush. Or O'Reilly, Falwell, Bush, the list is endless.  Why is it such a shock to libs that liberals spew hate?   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 23:39, 11 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Democrat (or at least ex-Democrat), sure. But liberal?==&lt;br /&gt;
Describing Phelps as a Democrat is justifiable, since he did run as a Democrat, but the first sentence dexcribes him as a &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot;, which I believe is the same as &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;. This seems flawed. Not all Democrats are liberal and vice versa (anyone remember Zell Miller? Reagan and Thurmond were both Democrats once too). Looking at Conservapedia's own definition of [[liberal]] we have the following specific views how many of them apply to Phelps?&lt;br /&gt;
#denial of inherent gender differences, leading to things such as allowing men and women to have the same jobs in the military (while quietly holding them to different standards)&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence that he feels this way&lt;br /&gt;
#taxpayer-funded abortion&lt;br /&gt;
#:Certainly not&lt;br /&gt;
#same-sex marriage&lt;br /&gt;
#:HA!&lt;br /&gt;
#support of affirmative action&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence of this&lt;br /&gt;
#support of political correctness&lt;br /&gt;
#:Not at all&lt;br /&gt;
#censorship of prayer in classrooms&lt;br /&gt;
#:No&lt;br /&gt;
#compelled taxpayer funding of government schools for nearly all ages&lt;br /&gt;
#:Hard to say, but publicly funded schools are hardly a liberal issue; there is widespread support for them. Most people do not want to completely privatize education.&lt;br /&gt;
#government-controlled medical care&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence of this&lt;br /&gt;
#labor unions&lt;br /&gt;
#:no evidence of this&lt;br /&gt;
#elimination of abstinence-only program funding&lt;br /&gt;
#:Given his religious views, this seems unlikely&lt;br /&gt;
#income redistribution, usually through progressive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence of this&lt;br /&gt;
#a &amp;quot;living Constitution&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted rather than an unchanging Constitution as written&lt;br /&gt;
#:No idea. He'd probably support a &amp;quot;living constitution&amp;quot; if interpretations of the document would harm the homosexual agenda, but against it if it would promote it. &lt;br /&gt;
#support for gun control&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidnce for this (seems unlikely)&lt;br /&gt;
#government programs to rehabilitate criminals&lt;br /&gt;
#:No idea&lt;br /&gt;
#environmentalism&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence for this&lt;br /&gt;
#disarmament treaties&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence (this guy seems not to be much of a foreign policy wonk, except when it comes to praising anti-gay foreign leaders)&lt;br /&gt;
#globalism&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence of this (except for global condemnation of homosexuality)&lt;br /&gt;
#opposition to a strong American foreign policy&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence&lt;br /&gt;
#support of obscenity and pornography as a First Amendment right&lt;br /&gt;
#:Seems unlikely&lt;br /&gt;
#opposition to full private property rights&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence of this&lt;br /&gt;
#limit conservative talk radio by reinstating the Fairness Doctrine&lt;br /&gt;
#:Seems unlikely that he'd want to do anything to aid the pro-gay liberal media&lt;br /&gt;
So he basically has no discernable liberal traits. This does not make him a conservative, but it really seems he's not a leftist. The only things that point to his leftism are running as a Democrat (who can say why he picked one party over the other? He didn't have much suport from either, it seems) and his support for Gore (dropped when it turned out Gore's views on homosexuality were more liberal than the previously appered). Since Democrat is not the same as liberal, I'm not sure how the latter applies to him. Can anyone justify the inclusion of the term leftist? If someone can point out statements he's made supporting strong environmentalism, opposition to gun rights, disarmament treaties, property rights opposition, or such a case could certainly be made, but right now I'm not seeing any real leftism here. [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 10:51, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; portion is cited.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:14, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry, but I don't see it. I see citations for the Democrat part, which isn't the issue. Can point out the specific citation to me? [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 14:47, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={91058469-F6DE-4615-8B2A-73CDF3E8FCAC}] Perhaps we need [[CP:Common knowledge]].  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:12, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sorry, but that doesn't clear anything up. Nowhere does that piece call Phelps &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; (even if it did, it would be the opinion of a journalist). We've established his conection to the Democratic Party, but where's his liberalism?  This site has 21 examples of liberal traits, which does he meet? His anti-gay agenda shapes his opinions on all other matters. If supporting Castro makes him a liberal, what about condemning Sweden (The most socialist state in Europe)? I think everyone can agree that hating gays is not a  trait that makes one liberal, and that is about the only trait he has. I think the guy defies all aspects of the traditional left/right spectrum, and I don't see the point of trying to pigeonhole him into one group. By all means this article should disassociate him from the Christian wing of the conservative movement, but that doesn't by definition make him liberal. Is there a source that shows how he meets even ''one'' of the 21 examples bove (and he'd need to meet more than one to be classified as a liberal)? [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 15:42, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::So, were back to the definition &amp;quot;a liberal is a leftist,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a leftist is a liberal.&amp;quot;  We were attacked by cyberterrorists for months trying to put that stuff in.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Liberals don't hate?  Please....And nowhere in the text does it say Phelps is a liberal.  He is in Cat:Liberal activists, and a strong case can be made that he belongs there.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:07, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I know nothing about cyberterrorists and such, but I was sort of under the impression that liberal and leftist were sort of interchangable. This site's own article says that leftist is associated with &amp;quot;social democracy, liberalism, or the several strains of socialism and communism. It may also be applied to those who oppose conservative politics. The word 'liberal' is often used in the US to mean 'leftist'. But this is inconsistent with the original meaning of the word liberal.&amp;quot; I see nothing socialist or communist about Phelps (support for Castro is based solely on his anti-gay stance, not his economics), nor any real connection with social democracy. In this country it ''is'' basically interchangable with &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; (classical liberalism is out of the scope of this issue), so calling him a leftist is much the same as calling him a liberal. And note that I never said liberals don't hate, I said that hating gays is not a liberal trait. Are you trying to argue that it is? I think that would be an uphill battle, but feel free to try. And by the way, calling him a liberal activist ''is'' calling him a liberal (just like saying someone is a Mexican footballer is saying he is Mexican, and a footballer). So if he isn't a liberal but is a leftist, what is it that makes him a leftist (and how is that different from the standard definition of liberal that the 21 points illustrate)? [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 16:28, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::&amp;quot;calling him a leftist is much the same as calling him a liberal,&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Where in the text does it say this?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:37, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Okay, if the two are not synonymous (or nearly so), then explain the difference. I think I'm not alone in thinking the two terms are so close as to be basically interchangable. The [[leftist]] article here is pretty unclear on just about all aspects of the term, and does not draw any real distinctions between liberal and leftist. The article even states &amp;quot;The word 'liberal' is often used in the US to mean 'leftist'&amp;quot;, and since this is an American encyclopedia, aimed at the layman, it seems that if you're going to use the term in different way than it is often used you should make that distinctly clear. If the article means to say he is a leftist but not a liberal then the difference between the two should be explicitly stated, and how he fits into the category &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; should also be made clear. Furthermore, if he isn't a liberal he should be removed from the liberal activists category, and his entry should be removed from the [[liberal hate speech]] article. [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 00:40, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::*''I think I'm not alone in thinking the two terms are so close as to be basically interchangable.''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::*Congratulations, and ''good for you.''  Unfortuneatly, like the [[theory of evolution]], you can not impose your [[moral]]ity on me, and ''force'' me to accept the [[political spectrum theory]].  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:47, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[unindenting] Well, this very site says the two terms are often used interchangably, and I have no idea what evolution and imposition of morality have to do with anything, so we'll let that bit rest. So I'll ask the questions I'd like to see addressed, and I'll number them to make it easy:&lt;br /&gt;
:1. What is the difference between a leftist and a liberal, as used in this case?&lt;br /&gt;
:2. How is Phelps a leftist? What specific opinions does he hold that make him such?&lt;br /&gt;
:3. If he is not a liberal, why is he in the liberal activist category, and used as an example of liberal hate speech?&lt;br /&gt;
I'll wait for a reply. [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 00:57, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Here it is, Troll:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * BillyFranco (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 04:57, 23 October 2007) (Earliest: 14:51, 22 October 2007) [6]&lt;br /&gt;
    * Briantrust (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 20:35, 20 October 2007) (Earliest: 15:54, 19 October 2007) [3]&lt;br /&gt;
    * AuH2O (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 16:34, 20 October 2007) (Earliest: 14:59, 20 October 2007) [3]&lt;br /&gt;
 IP: 24.29.72.31 Schenectady, NY,United States&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Here is yet another shining example of liberal [[deceit]].  They cannot even argue honestly.  They need socks to hide their dishonesty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Godspeed to you! --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:47, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;RobS high fives TK&amp;gt;; By thier fruits ye shall know them.  Defenders &amp;amp; apologists is usually a dead give away.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:24, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Activist? (Edit Break)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I despise Liberals but I have to agree with this loonie leftie this time, Phelps is definetly not a liberal even though he was (or possibly still is) a member of the Democratic Party. Besides what's wrong with protesting homosexuality anyways? I just think he carries it too far thats all --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 16:22, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ahaha, typical liberal behaviour lol. Still though, I don't think Phelps is a liberal. He certainly isn't conservative either but calling him a liberal when he clearly isn't just makes Conservapedia look bad.--[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 17:59, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did you at all read the material RobS provided?  --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:13, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not yet, I'll take a look at it and make my decision on Phelps' political views then --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 18:25, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've taken a look at some of the things Rob has said, Phelps is or was a democrat but he is liberal only in name. His views are not liberal at all. I don't care what he says about homosexuality, it is a sin after all, Phelps just goes a little too nutty over it. My issue with him is the disrespect of American soldiers and his criticism of Bush. Bush is in no way a &amp;quot;fag-enabler&amp;quot; and is quite critical of homosexuality. Phelps is not firing on all cylinders though, thats for sure. --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 18:40, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Konserva... the guy above me, Phelps doesn't really qualify as a leftist/liberal. I mean, if he joined the Republican party, would we even be discussing this? There are probably quite a few rogues if we look hard enough into each party's details. maybe Charles Manson believed in a weak federal government and strong gun ownership rights. Does that alone make him a Conservative? At the end of the day, I think the blush is off his liberal democrat rose. [[User:Mathers|ItMathers]] 18:49, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is pretty easy, as RobS says, to get people to reveal themselves! --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:23, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, I will say I'm happy he's on their side. ;) [[User:Mathers|ItMathers]] 19:36, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::We should probably give credit to the watchdog organizations that single out and trash Phleps, it gives them credibility and balance, shows they are capable of broadminded thinking, and not mindless partisan trolls.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 23:54, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If these watchdog groups are liberal, they will likely just throw Phelps in with conservatives. While I don't think Phelps is a liberal, his anti-war activities and support of Castro make him exempt from being classified as a conservative. I don't think Phelps falls neatly into either category and both liberals and conservatives are accusing him of being in the other camp because nobody wants him --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 00:05, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*''If these watchdog groups are liberal, they will likely just throw Phelps in with conservatives.''&lt;br /&gt;
:*They've obviously done that.  This is why CP exists, this is closely related to one of our core missions, to counter these slanders of conservatives &amp;amp; conservative views by leftist ideological slander factories.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:09, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree, the media has a terrible liberal bias along with these watchdog groups. Phelps is delusional, he is neither liberal or conservative. I still think we should leave political labels out of the description (other than his support for Al Gore which is documented fact), it will just make Conservapedia look bad and give those whiney liberals something else to complain about --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 00:12, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Where does the media get thier impressions and opinion about Phelps?  From these watchdog organizations -- you never would have heard of Phelps otherwise.  Then the media &amp;amp; watchdog organizations also are actively engaged in an agenda, pushing [[gay rights]] and the [[homosexual agenda]], for example.  Where does the opposition to this agenda come from? Church people.  Who is Phelps &amp;amp; what is his organization? He's a preacher &amp;amp; preaches at a church.  ''Voila!''  We have more right-wing, neofascist, hate-mongering Christain Coalition homophobic bigots that need to be exterminated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, his views are Democrat, on the left, and quite in the tradition of stupid, pointless, [[liberal activism]] designed for no other reason than to get people angry, and draw publicity.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:22, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just because someone is democrat doesn't mean that they are liberal. Bob Novak was a democrat --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 18:31, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Bob Novak is and was pretty liberal on many things, so a poor example. ;-) -- --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:45, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bob Novak liberal? I don't find him that liberal. He is pro-Iraq war and anti-socialized-medicine. Perhaps he is not as conservative as most Republicans but he is certainly more conservative than the vast majority of democrats and some Republicans too. Also Al and Tipper Gore weren't always as liberal as they claim they are today. They were both in favour of censoring violent and explicit lyrics of rappers and Al Gore was anti-homosexual at one point. They only distanced themselves from Phelps when it became politically expedient. They didn't mind his money though. Still the point is as much as a nut as Phelps is, he isn't really a liberal and it is misleading to label him that. He is opposed to the homosexual agenda, is antiabortion, antievolution, and is religious. While he may share the anti-war sentiment of the left, his reasons for doing so are completely different. I think it is misleading to label him a leftist and we don't want to be guilty of bias like Wikipedia is --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 13:42, 25 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Maybe I need to teach a class or something, helping liberals do parody of conservatives. :S --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:42, 25 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You think Phelps is actually a liberal pretending to hate homosexuals to make conservatives look bad? I don't think he's intelligent enough to think of such a scheme. Liberals are usually pretty stupid. --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 16:25, 25 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Phelps is a Demon, not a Human. Important difference. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:45, 25 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Fred Phelps is NOT left-wing==&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Fred Phelps a closet liberal&amp;quot; source is merely a discussion in relation to an article, it is not a valid source and should be removed. The left support gays and anti-homosexuality adovocates clearly belong on the right whether they are democrat or republican. --[[User:ChavezFan|ChavezFan]] 16:41, 29 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Do all left-wingers [[fascism|goosestep]] to the [[gay agenda]]?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:14, 30 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::They Pretty much do, liberalism and homosexuality go hand in hand, stupid liberals. Talk about Groupthink hahahaha --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 19:45, 30 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I thought liberalism was the [[big tent]]? You mean everyone has to tow the party line, and there is no tolerance for [[diversity]]?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 20:29, 30 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Liberals are very intolerant of conservative viewpoints. While they are tolerant of nearly all religions (except Christianity) they are very intolerant of anyone who criticizes homosexuality or political correctness. Liberals are highly ideological. Trust me, I come from a country full of these pinkos --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 21:33, 30 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Does it really matter? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trying to associating Fred Phelps with the right or the left is ridiculous. Neither of them like him. The whole political spectrum wouldn't mind a meteorite taking out the Westboro Baptist Church compound (preferably with the whole congregation/family inside) It's deceptive and ridiculous to try to associate him with anyone as a means of discrediting them: Democrats hate him, Baptists hate him, Christian fundamentalists hate him, the ACLU hates him. Gays hate him, US soldiers hate him, Mary Cheney hates him, Swedes hate him, Al Gore hates him, 9/11 victims hate him. Who knows, '''maybe God Hates Fred Phelps'''. So please, have some '''common sense''' and remove the deceptive references to leftist, liberal, and the anti-war movement. - [[User:PostoStudanto|PostoStudanto]] [[User_talk:PostoStudanto| &amp;amp;#x2709;Tλlk]] 23:13, 8 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. One of the blog links is broken.&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, your [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fred_Phelps&amp;amp;diff=330569&amp;amp;oldid=330497 removal] of my remarks against Fred Phelps was totally uncalled for and not remotely related to policy. {{tl|Remove personal remark}} is for attacks on fellow editors, not going after the subject of an article. From what I've seen on Conservapedia, going after a [[Hillary Rodham Clinton|subject]] is acceptable anywhere. No personal attacks itself isn't even well enforced, for that matter. For example, you told someone to &amp;quot;get a chiropractor to help get your foot out of your mouth&amp;quot; on [[Talk:Al Gore]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Oops, forgot my sig yesterday [[User:PostoStudanto|PostoStudanto]] [[User_talk:PostoStudanto| &amp;amp;#x2709;Tλlk]] 22:41, 15 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Trying to associating Fred Phelps with the right or the left is ridiculous.''&lt;br /&gt;
Seconded - ''(the following is reposted, since it seems to have escaped the sysops' attention. Apologies.)''&lt;br /&gt;
As I understand it, membership of either the Republican or Democrat Party in the States requires no specific ideology and often is simply a matter of publically stating your preference. As Stephen Colbert demonstrated recently, it's even possible to be a member of both! It's a bit of a stretch then to say that Democrats en masse (or liberals, for that matter) consider him 'one of their own'. It might be more accurate to say that Phelps &amp;quot;self-identifies as a Democrat&amp;quot;, and elsewhere in the article that &amp;quot;Phelps has been criticized by conservatives and liberals alike&amp;quot;. Is there any way we can modify the page to reflect this? [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 23:14, 15 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Fred Phelps is a leftist anti-homosexual behavior activist and liberal Democrat&amp;quot;== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original post by [[User:ModerateCatholic|ModerateCatholic]] on the [[Talk:Main Page|Main Page Talk]]. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 18:45, 14 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Since the article is locked, and several people have appealed for it to be changed on the talk page but ignored, I thought it best to put it here in order to garner some sort of consensus. Is Fred Phelps a Liberal? Picketing funerals of soldiers killed in Iraq because their country supposedly supports the 'homosexual agenda' is markedly illiberal. It needs change. [[User:ModerateCatholic|ModerateCatholic]] 16:54, 14 December 2007 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here, also, is the ensuing discussion on the main page. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 14:57, 28 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''As a veteran, I find Fred Phelps' actions to be reprehensible and despicable.  The very freedom that allowed him and his ilk to protest in that manner was provided by the life of the soldier he's protesting.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 09:58, 15 December 2007 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''Nobody likes [[Fred Phelps]], we know that. But that doesn't mean he can be branded a [[liberal]] just for being despicable - does it? Apparently he has some history with the [[Democratic Party]], but his actual views don't seem very &amp;quot;liberal Democrat&amp;quot; to me. Perhaps he doesn't really fit into any political category? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 11:12, 15 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::''Even if he was a staunch Republican and conservative, there is absolutely no call for his actions.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 11:28, 15 December 2007 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
::''Agreed (though I hope it didn't seem that I was trying to imply he was!) [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 17:30, 15 December 2007 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
''In light of Andy's recent comments about non-linear political alignment, I would recommend that the &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; statement be redacted, and something to the effect of &amp;quot;Fred Phelps' political alignment seems to fall outside of any political category&amp;quot;. --[[User:SimonA|SimonA]] 16:07, 15 December 2007 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
''Given that advancing the homosexual agenda is a defining characteristic of Democrats and Liberals, it's hard to see how being so opposed to homosexuals would make him a Democrat or a Liberal. I looked over the article on him, and it said he did run to be the democrat nominee but didn't win. Maybe there are races where he did win the nomination, but just running doesn't mean the democrats support him. I mean, I would never call Ron Paul a republican but here he is running as one.[[User:TRipp|TRipp]] 16:28, 15 December 2007 (EST)''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Another example why any moralistic person should avoid this site like a plague. [[User:ModerateCatholic|ModerateCatholic]] 12:55, 28 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The word &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; should be removed from the first sentence ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is fine to characterize him as democrat, since this is documented, but characterizing him as a &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; is far from documented, or universally accepted.  If there are people that feel that is the case, then it is worth a section in the article, however placing a controversial and undocumented piece of information in the first sentence, discredits the article as a whole.--[[User:PhineasBogg|PhineasBogg]] 23:21, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wholeheartedly agree, and I think there's a clear consensus on this point. I will request the page to be unlocked so that we can edit it. [[User:Walton One|Walton One]] 11:40, 18 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps and the Bible ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article has a lot of condemnatory language about him from a secular standpoint, but it should also say what's wrong with him from a Biblical standpoint, citing chapter and verse. [[User:DavidE|DavidE]] 10:37, 12 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree. How about starting with 1 Corinthians 6:9-11? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:44, 18 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Am I the only one? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone else thinks Fred Phelps looks like the Reverand Kane from the Poltergiest movies?  {{unsigned|Jedisqrl}}&lt;br /&gt;
: Or does Reverend Kane look like Fred Phelps (deliberately)?  (I don't know what either looks like, so I'm offering no opinion).  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:08, 8 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::You're definitely [http://msunderestimated.com/PhelpsKane.jpg not alone]! [[User:StatsMsn|StatsMsn]] 09:48, 8 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I doubt the Poltergeist movies were influenced by Phelps, considering they well pre-date his rise to prominence. I suppose its possible, that Phelps intentionally tries to look like him, if the idea that he's actually running some sort of performance art piece and/or massive parody of Christian fundamentalism is true, but I doubt that's the case. [[User:ArthurA|ArthurA]] 13:07, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;First class nut&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have heard and seen this before, but I have been unable to find a source attributing this particular quote. Anyone care to help me out? [[User:EelisA|EelisA]] 16:46, 14 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Not liberal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He's not a liberal, if he opposes homosexuality. But I don't think of him as a conservative: more of a radical fundamentalist. He's the [[gay rights movement]]'s poster boy for [[intolerance]], a potent justification for using the label &amp;quot;[[homophobia]]&amp;quot; to describe all the opposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it would help our cause to distance ourselves from him. In particular the motto, &amp;quot;God hates fags&amp;quot; is not a conservative idea. Recall, &amp;quot;[[God hates sin but loves the sinner]]&amp;quot;. Our heavenly Father has a [[parental heart]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:00, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I would argue that Phelps is actually insane, in the clinical sense of the word. Its unfair to attempt to attach any mainstream political label to him -- people all across the political spectrum reject him. [[User:ArthurA|ArthurA]] 13:03, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::^This. To be honest, this also goes for people like Hitler; people who are so left-wing they go off the edge and appear on the right, people who are neither left nor right but up or down. There's some people you can't classify other than 'insane'. [[User:ETrundel|ETrundel]] 13:24, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Careful, now. Whenever an online discussion starts to mention Hitler, that's like touching the third rail in the subway. The power of his shocking works overwhelm us, and we stop thinking clearly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps is only wrong in his idea that God &amp;quot;punishes&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;hates&amp;quot; homosexuals. This is not to say that he's wrong about homosexuality being a sin. A lot of support for Communism is based on a high ethical idea that no one should monopolize the nation's wealth at the expense of the poor. They only go wrong in the way they want to solve the [[unequal distribution]] problem: i.e., &amp;quot;kill the capitalists and steal their loot!&amp;quot; [http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:JwqaZFQvOtMJ:www.cusd.chico.k12.ca.us/~bsilva/projects/russia/Radzinsky%2520Stalin.doc+bolsheviks+steal+loot&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ct=clnk&amp;amp;cd=5&amp;amp;gl=us&amp;amp;client=firefox-a] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We need to solve economic problems that Capitalism and Communism have not been able to eliminate. Ethical means, however, must be used. Likewise, we need to solve the problem of [[immorality]] (and not only [[homosexuality]: there's a lot of heterosexual sin, such as [[adultery]]); yet an attitude of hatred and hostility towards people is not likely to solve the [[free love]] problem. It could make it worse. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:40, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd say he's wrong about considerably more than just his idea that God hates homosexuals, Ed.  Remember that Phelps and his flock are virulently anti-American and celebrate the deaths of American soldiers and Americans in general.  A number of his faithful recently turned up in Buffalo to picket memorial services for those who died on Flight 3407; his daughter claimed in an interview that the plane crashed as punishment for not giving more credit to God for the Miracle on the Hudson.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 16:47, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, one cannot diagnose &amp;quot;insanity&amp;quot; without a medical degree, you know.  I never supported or endorsed Al Gore for President. I never donated any of my personal property for a Gore campaign headquarters. I wonder who is the liberal then, me, or Fred Phelps who actually is a Gore supporter?  It's not exactly rocket science, but I do see lots of liberals squirming and parsing words, and making up all kinds of caveats to somehow spin it Phelps isn't one!  --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:14, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And Ronald Reagan was once a Democrat. Prominent conservative activist David Horowitz was a gen-yoo-wine Marxist during the Sixties. Lots of people change their views throughout their lives. But I don't think he calls himself a Democrat now, and I doubt anyone in the party welcome him if he tried to become active again. You can't eternally classify someone by the views they once held. And yes, at one time, Phelps labeled himself as a Democrat, and was involved in the party. &lt;br /&gt;
::: And yes, I am not formerly qualified to diagnose Phelps as insane (and even someone who does have the qualification would have to spend time interviewing him.) However, from what I've read about Phelps, he apparently had a severe problem with amphetamines at one time (back in the days when they were &amp;quot;diet pills&amp;quot;. The children that are estranged from the family report he beat them with the handle of a mattock (very close to an axe handle, or, to put it more simply, a really thick piece of wood.) He believes that ''only'' the members of his church are saved. I think that all points to some serious mental illness. [[User:ArthurA|ArthurA]] 08:49, 27 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::He may be a liberal, an insane one who carves his own niche in the political spectrum but a liberal all the same, but I dont think he's a Gore supporter any more. He was back when he believed Gore had a more anti-homosexual agenda, but now he strongly opposes Gore, and other Democratic figureheads like the Clintons. Any chance he'd be considered a populist or totalitarian? [[User:TPerry|TPerry]] 19:42, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Populist? Not at all. He argues that only members of his church are saved, and every other human being is going to Hell. That's not populist in any way; its about as elitist as could be imagined. Totalitarian? Hard to say, considering outside of his obsessions with homosexuals and how the government should treat them, I don't think he comments much on how a government should be structured. I wouldn't be surprised to learn he'd support a form of totalitarian theocracy, though, with himself as a priest-king. [[User:ArthurA|ArthurA]] 11:09, 27 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I consider him an enemy of America, personally.  That's about all the label he requires, in my book.--[[User:Benp|Benp]] 19:57, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The problem is with terminology and definitions.  &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; are terms that encompass a whole bag of issues and views, including political, economic, and religious.  There are many people who are &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in some areas and &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; in other areas (even though, in some cases, their views may appear to be or may actually be contradictory).  Although I'd agree that someone who opposed homosexuality is likely to be a conservative, that is not the sole factor defining a conservative.  If they are mostly but not completely one way or the other, they might be called a &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; liberal or conservative.  But some, like Phelps from what I can gather, fit neatly in neither.  But this is only a problem if one believes that &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; between them cover all possibilities.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:13, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:ArthurA, that great site of errors- Wikipedia, list Phelps as a Democrat. The reason that conservatives to want to label him a Democrat is the fact that 'we Christians' are appalled by his actions. It is so easy for our religious opponents to say...another fundie right-winger, when the whole mess that exists is truly non-Christian, non-conservative. Naturally, nobody likes to be associated with this guy but unfortunately, everybody is.--[[User:Jpatt|jpatt]] 13:03, 27 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: So Wikipedia lists Phelps as a Democrat, and Wikipedia's full of errors, so does that mean that he's not a Democrat?&lt;br /&gt;
:: People do change their views, and I find it hard to imagine either main American party endorsing him, but is there any evidence of him changing his Democratic allegiance?  Wikipedia's references to him being a Democrat seem to be based on him standing as one in various elections, the last of which was eleven years ago.  Yes, he could have changed his mind since then, but the claim would be a lot more convincing if the last connection with the Democrats was, say, 30 years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
:: Being appalled by his actions is not justification for labelling him in any group.  Yes, it is easy for anti-Christians to cite his as a Christian, but them being wrong on that doesn't mean that we can therefore do similar in return and group him with the Democrats simply because we don't want him grouped with us.&lt;br /&gt;
:: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 17:30, 27 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Perhaps the best solution is not to dwell on how he should be labeled, but to simply acknowledge that his position is not Christian and not worthy of notice.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 17:56, 27 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Proof that Phelps is not a liberal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said so himself on the FAQ of his website, godhatesfags.com. In the FAQ, he openly denounces Republicans, but says that liberals are even worse. [[User:AjitJ|AjitJ]] 09:20, 11 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
== Unlock this page ==&lt;br /&gt;
I think this page should be unlocked&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that so? Well, you've made an excellent argument. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 11:09, 31 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== He's not a liberal, and he has said so himself ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page should be altered to reflect that. See, &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://www.godhatesfags.com/faq.html#Right here]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; he says, in reply to a question regarding his views on the Religious Right:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
They spend more time harrassing people who are preaching the Gospel than anything else, just like the Pharisees did to Jesus. They are '''second in evil''' only to the modern day Saduccees (i.e., bleeding heart '''liberals'''). ''(my emphasis)''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why does the article even claim such a thing? It's clearly false. [[User:AlanR|AlanR]] 08:20, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Interesting point. Only the link you provide does not say what you say it says. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 09:15, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::RobSmith, are you accusing AlanR of misquoting? Because otherwise it's pure logic that someone who calls liberals more evil than conservatives would not be himself a liberal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Since this page rightly calls out liberals for trying &amp;quot;to link Phelps to the Religious Right,&amp;quot; it's hypocritical to label him a liberal when the evidence suggests otherwise. Or do you have some other evidence for this claim? [[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 10:41, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think we've shown his intolerance and close mindedness.  What more liberal traits do we have to prove?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:16, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Self-promotion, attention-grabbing, interpreting the Bible any way he wants? Check, check, check! [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 16:18, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Against the war in Iraq, hates the troops. support from the ACLU--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:21, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He is a political opportunist, at the very least, and that is a sign of liberalism.  The undisputed fact he once supported Al Gore, and that was back in the day only liberals would have considered it, brands him for what he is. I cannot believe anyone is still questioning the appellation!   I assume the user would also question labeling Nazi's as leftists, Communism as a tool for mass murder and Planned Parenthood as racist progressives and [[Eugenicists]].  You should open your mind to the truth, because it will set you free! --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:38, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:He also spreads what has been described as 'hate speech'. This is a clear liberal trait. Conservatives are only Anti-homosexual because we know that the Lord would want them to see the light. Stop trying to whitewash by claiming he is not a liberal- this is typical liberal deceit. [[User:Myrobi|Myrobi]] 17:18, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Do you really believe that?  I know conservatives who are anti-homosexual agenda, I know Christians who oppose homosexuality on Biblical grounds, but I have never met conservatives who dislike Gay people, in general. Maybe you meant conservatives are anti-homosexuality? --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:42, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Everyone is missing the point. It doesn't matter what the editors consider him to be, it's how he identifies himself and how other sources identify him. I thought this was supposed to be an encyclopedia? That's what encyclopedias do, they report the facts. And the facts say that Phelps considers liberals to be evil, no external source considers Phelps to be a liberal, and the listing him as &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; here is just an attempt to remove his stigma from the conservative side. You all need to grow up and face the facts, whether or not they're on your side. [[User:HyglacQ|HyglacQ]] 11:42, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::''it's how he identifies himself and '''how other sources identify him'''''&lt;br /&gt;
::What? We're somehow subhuman [[untermensch]] and how CP defines him doesn't count?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:15, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Beating a dead horse HyglacQ, I guess you will discount all facts. 9 out of 10 crazies come from the leftside of politics.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 11:47, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Sorry TK, I meant Anti-homosexuality, as conservatives are against it on principle, but without discriminating against those who are different. After all, we aren't liberals. HyglacQ, I have reported you for spreading liberal lies, make useful edits or take your leftism elsewhere. [[User:Myrobi|Myrobi]] 11:49, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Phelps&amp;diff=832977</id>
		<title>Fred Phelps</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Phelps&amp;diff=832977"/>
		<updated>2010-12-17T21:04:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Correct link.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Phelps.jpg|right|thumb|Fred Phelps giving an interview in 2000]]'''Fred Waldron Phelps''' is [[pastor]] of the independent [[Westboro Baptist Church]], an extremist organization not affiliated with mainstream [[Baptist]] churches, and is a controversial activist against [[homosexual]] behavior. Phelps is noted for rallies displaying signs with highly inflammatory and [[extremist]] statements. This has classified the church as a hate group by the radical [[leftist]] [[Southern Poverty Law Center]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.buffalonews.com/258/story/586891.html Counterdemonstrators drive off hate group in Flight 3407 protest] The Buffalo News, February 22, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He is said to hold a &amp;quot;[[Hyper-Calvinism|hyper-Calvinistic]] viewpoint&amp;quot; generally regarded as far outside of mainstream Christianity by most Christian scholars.  Most of the congregants of the Westboro Baptist Church, which is located in [[Topeka]], [[Kansas]], are related to Phelps either by blood or marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has openly denounced the [[Catholic Church]] and [[Episcopal Church]] and has made claims these religious organizations tolerate and harbor homosexuals and pedophiles. He has also referred to a variety of political figures as &amp;quot;fag-enablers&amp;quot;, ranging from Republican Presidents [[Ronald Reagan]]. [[George W. Bush]] to Democrats such as [[Howard Dean]]. Phelps is a vehement critic of [[Dick Cheney]]. [http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-8194338250744686470&amp;amp;q#] His views are rejected by the majority of [[conservative]] [[Christian]]s; [[evangelical]] leader [[Jerry Falwell]] referred to him as a &amp;quot;first-class nut&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cjonline.com/webindepth/phelps/stories/102498_protests.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has led protests at military funerals based on his belief that America is a country that harbors homosexuals and is thus evil. As a result, President [[George W. Bush]] signed the Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act, which places limitations on protests at military funerals. These demonstrations led to the formation of the [[Patriot Guard]], an organization of motorcyclists who attend military funerals in order to shield the families of the deceased from the protests by members of Phelps's Westboro Baptist Church.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-09-13-funeral-protests_x.htm Funeral protesters say laws can't silence them], By Charlie Riedel, Associated Press, July 2006.  Retrieved from USA Today October 14, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Phelps is being represented by the [[ACLU]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/22/AR2006072200643.html ACLU Sues for Anti-Gay Group That Pickets at Troops' Burials], By Garance Burke, Associated Press, July 23, 2006; Page A02. Retrieved from the ''[[Washington Post]]'' October 14, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has been an active contributor to the [[Democratic Party]] and was enthusiastic supporter of [[Al Gore]] for President in 1988.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/1999/03/lauerman.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Phelps's son, Fred Phelps, Jr., also served as a delegate for Gore. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=15559&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has since changed his opinion about Gore when he joined [[Bill Clinton]] on the 1992 presidential ticket.  Phelps turned on him and claimed Gore was a conservative icon of the Democratic Party that sold out on some critical social issues.  Phelps also demonstrated against Clinton and Gore during the 1997 inaugural. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={91058469-F6DE-4615-8B2A-73CDF3E8FCAC}  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4179/is_20001104/ai_n11753681 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps' Criticism of Religious Leaders ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps runs several websites on the Internet which preach against [[homosexuality]] and immoral living.  Phelps espouses a skewed version of his own &amp;quot;literal&amp;quot; interpretation of the [[Bible]] and the holy scriptures, and speaks against mainstream religious and Christian leaders who in his view, distort or twist the literal interpretation of the Bible.  Phelps also speaks for greater accountability for religious organizations, such as the Catholic Church, and has been vocal in the press and media concerning the abuse of young boys by Catholic Priests and Church Leaders, and practicing homosexuals in the Episcopal Church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps and Democrat politics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps ran for governor of [[Kansas]] as a [[Democrat]] in 1990, 1994, and 1998.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ref4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://edition.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/08/05/kansas.results/ 1998 Kansas Primary Results. Compiled by Congressional Quarterly.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Phelps received 31% of the vote in Kansas's 1992 Democratic Party primary for [[U.S. Senate]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kssos.org/elections/elections_statistics.html State of Kansas Secretary of State Website]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1993 Phelps ran for mayor of [[Topeka]]. and 1997. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21229 The &amp;quot;God Hates Fags&amp;quot; [[Left]]],  By Mark D. Tooley, FrontPageMagazine.com, February 09, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.religionnewsblog.com/1128/kansas-anti-gay-church-embarrasses-topekans Kansas anti-gay church embarrasses Topekans], November 7, 2002. Retrieved from ReligionNewsBlog.com, October 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He supported [[Al Gore]] in the 1988 primaries. Phelps has been a vocal criric of former Vice President [[Dick Cheney]] and his whole family saying, &amp;quot;They know the iniquity they’ve wrought, but they’re not at all ashamed of it...God hates the Cheneys.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8194338250744686470#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps and Saddam Hussein ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1997, upset about [[United States]] sanctions on [[Iraq]], Phelps wrote a letter to [[Saddam Hussein]] that read, in part, ''We understand that Iraq is the only Muslim state that allows the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ to be freely and openly preached on the streets without fear of arrest and prosecution. Alas, the United States no longer allows the Gospel to be freely and openly preached on the streets, because militant sodomites now control our government, and they violently object to the Bible message.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adl.org/special_reports/wbc/wbc_on_america.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He requested, and received, permission from Hussein to protest  in Iraq. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={91058469-F6DE-4615-8B2A-73CDF3E8FCAC}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lawsuits and Litigation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Phelps and his congregation were recently sued by Albert Snyder, the father of a soldier killed in Iraq. Phelps and his congregation protested the Iraq War at his son's funeral. The father sued for defamation over Phelps' statement: &amp;quot;Mr. Snyder raised his son for the devil and hell,&amp;quot; during the funeral protest and in statements on his website.  A federal jury in Baltimore awarded him nearly $11 million in a verdict against the church; Mr. Snyder won on every count of his complaint, receiving $2.9 million for compensatory damages and $8 million for punitive damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Phelps has also been threatened with prosecution by the Canadian Government for alleged hate speech in Canada for preaching what he has stated are the literal teachings of the Bible against homosexuality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=15559 Gore sought help from anti-homosexual group], 'God hates fags' creator preaches 'hate because the Bible preaches hate', By Jon E. Dougherty, ''WorldNetDaily.com'', October 25, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Already picketing daily in Topeka, the Phelpses began to shower faxes on the community, targeting business and political leaders they disagreed with. After Topeka councilwoman Beth Mechler publicly doubted Phelps' claims that wild [[gay sex]] was occurring in Gage Park, Phelps responded with an insulting fax.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism of Phelps==&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has been criticized by a great number of individuals, both conservative and liberal. For example, [[Jerry Falwell]]  referred to Phelps as &amp;quot;a first class nut&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cjonline.com/webindepth/phelps/stories/102498_protests.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Illinois Family Institute Executive Director Peter LaBarbera said &amp;quot;Fred Phelps' curious message is hardly Christian, and only fuels societal bigotry toward those who espouse genuine Biblical views on social issues like homosexuality and abortion,&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eleventh-avenue-south.com/archives/2005/08/fred_phelps_a_p.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps was also cited during Canadian deliberations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/dec/07121806.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; about declaring anti-gay sentiments to be a hate crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Westboro Baptist also is monitored by the Anti-Defamation League.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pickets ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1f3.jpg|right|thumb|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps announced that he and his group would picket the funeral service of actor [[Heath Ledger]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2009, Phelps' group announced that they would travel to the [[United Kingdom]] to protest in [[Basingstoke]] against a gay-themed play called [[The Laramie Project]], based on the murder of [[Matthew Shepard]]. &lt;br /&gt;
However, the British Foreign Secretary [[Jacqui Smith]] later announced on February 19th that they would be barred from entering the country as the group &amp;quot;engaged in unacceptable behaviour by inciting hatred against a number of communities&amp;quot;. Phelps' group later responded with a message on their website GodHatesFags.com stating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;You British Bastards will not have Jesus Christ to rule over you, and think you can issue bans and pass laws to remove God’s word from the landscape. You do greatly err, not knowing the power of God; and, you do that against your own interests. It is a great kindness to have God’s prophets in your land. But, you ungrateful brutes despise knowledge. It is too late for the UK. God Hates You! God’s wrath and destruction is all that’s left for you, thanks to Secretary Smith.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-11226.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite efforts by [[leftist]]s to link Phelps to the Religious Right, Phelps refers to Christian conservatives as &amp;quot;People who have gone a whoring after strange gods.&amp;quot;  Phelps preaching has much in common with the Reverend [[Jeremiah Wright]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Outside links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://blank.org/addict/ Addicted to Hate: the story of Fred Phelps]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOrz5k0jWdU The Most Hated Family In America]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://toiletpaperonline.typepad.com/the_blog/2006/03/how_much_do_you.html Oh yeah, and he used to be tight with Al Gore]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8194338250744686470# Fred Phelps' Unhinged Video Message to the Cheneys]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.adl.org/poisoning_web/homophobia.asp Poisoning the Web: Hatred Online], Anti-Defamation League (2001). Retrieved 05/23/07. &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.godhatesfredphelps.com/ God Hates Fred Phelps], Retrieved from http://www.godhatesfredphelps.com/ October 25, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8682089528957352638&amp;amp;ei=YB-PSa6HCYbi2gKtgPnCCw&amp;amp;q=fred+phelps+jerry+falwell&amp;amp;hl=en Phelps denouncing] [[Jerry Falwell]] after his death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-war Movements]]	&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Phelps, Fred}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Phelps&amp;diff=832975</id>
		<title>Fred Phelps</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Phelps&amp;diff=832975"/>
		<updated>2010-12-17T20:59:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Correct link.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Phelps.jpg|right|thumb|Fred Phelps giving an interview in 2000]]'''Fred Waldron Phelps''' is [[pastor]] of the independent [[Westboro Baptist Church]], an extremist organization not affiliated with mainstream [[Baptist]] churches, and is a controversial activist against [[homosexual]] behavior. Phelps is noted for rallies displaying signs with highly inflammatory and [[extremist]] statements. This has classified the church as a hate group by the radical [[leftist]] [[Southern Poverty Law Center]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.buffalonews.com/258/story/586891.html Counterdemonstrators drive off hate group in Flight 3407 protest] The Buffalo News, February 22, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He is said to hold a &amp;quot;[[Hyper-Calvinism|hyper-Calvinistic]] viewpoint&amp;quot; generally regarded as far outside of mainstream Christianity by most Christian scholars.  Most of the congregants of the Westboro Baptist Church, which is located in [[Topeka]], [[Kansas]], are related to Phelps either by blood or marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has openly denounced the [[Catholic Church]] and [[Episcopal Church]] and has made claims these religious organizations tolerate and harbor homosexuals and pedophiles. He has also referred to a variety of political figures as &amp;quot;fag-enablers&amp;quot;, ranging from Republican Presidents [[Ronald Reagan]]. [[George W. Bush]] to Democrats such as [[Howard Dean]]. Phelps is a vehement critic of [[Dick Cheney]]. [http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-8194338250744686470&amp;amp;q#] His views are rejected by the majority of [[conservative]] [[Christian]]s; [[evangelical]] leader [[Jerry Falwell]] referred to him as a &amp;quot;first-class nut&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cjonline.com/webindepth/phelps/stories/102498_protests.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has led protests at military funerals based on his belief that America is a country that harbors homosexuals and is thus evil. As a result, President [[George W. Bush]] signed the Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act, which places limitations on protests at military funerals. These demonstrations led to the formation of the [[Patriot Guard]], an organization of motorcyclists who attend military funerals in order to shield the families of the deceased from the protests by members of Phelps's Westboro Baptist Church.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-09-13-funeral-protests_x.htm Funeral protesters say laws can't silence them], By Charlie Riedel, Associated Press, July 2006.  Retrieved from USA Today October 14, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Phelps is being represented by the [[ACLU]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/22/AR2006072200643.html ACLU Sues for Anti-Gay Group That Pickets at Troops' Burials], By Garance Burke, Associated Press, July 23, 2006; Page A02. Retrieved from the ''[[Washington Post]]'' October 14, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has been an active contributor to the [[Democratic Party]] and was enthusiastic supporter of [[Al Gore]] for President in 1988.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/1999/03/lauerman.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Phelps's son, Fred Phelps, Jr., also served as a delegate for Gore. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=15559&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has since changed his opinion about Gore when he joined [[Bill Clinton]] on the 1992 presidential ticket.  Phelps turned on him and claimed Gore was a conservative icon of the Democratic Party that sold out on some critical social issues.  Phelps also demonstrated against Clinton and Gore during the 1997 inaugural. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={91058469-F6DE-4615-8B2A-73CDF3E8FCAC}  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4179/is_20001104/ai_n11753681 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps' Criticism of Religious Leaders ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps runs several websites on the Internet which preach against [[homosexuality]] and immoral living.  Phelps espouses a skewed version of his own &amp;quot;literal&amp;quot; interpretation of the [[Bible]] and the holy scriptures, and speaks against mainstream religious and Christian leaders who in his view, distort or twist the literal interpretation of the Bible.  Phelps also speaks for greater accountability for religious organizations, such as the Catholic Church, and has been vocal in the press and media concerning the abuse of young boys by Catholic Priests and Church Leaders, and practicing homosexuals in the Episcopal Church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps and Democrat politics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps ran for governor of [[Kansas]] as a [[Democrat]] in 1990, 1994, and 1998.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ref4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://edition.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/08/05/kansas.results/ 1998 Kansas Primary Results. Compiled by Congressional Quarterly.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Phelps received 31% of the vote in Kansas's 1992 Democratic Party primary for [[U.S. Senate]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kssos.org/elections/elections_statistics.html State of Kansas Secretary of State Website]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1993 Phelps ran for mayor of [[Topeka]]. and 1997. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21229 The &amp;quot;God Hates Fags&amp;quot; [[Left]]],  By Mark D. Tooley, FrontPageMagazine.com, February 09, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.religionnewsblog.com/1128/kansas-anti-gay-church-embarrasses-topekans Kansas anti-gay church embarrasses Topekans], November 7, 2002. Retrieved from ReligionNewsBlog.com, October 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He supported [[Al Gore]] in the 1988 primaries. Phelps has been a vocal criric of former Vice President [[Dick Cheney]] and his whole family saying, &amp;quot;They know the iniquity they’ve wrought, but they’re not at all ashamed of it...God hates the Cheneys.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8194338250744686470#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps and Saddam Hussein ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1997, upset about [[United States]] sanctions on [[Iraq]], Phelps wrote a letter to [[Saddam Hussein]] that read, in part, ''We understand that Iraq is the only Muslim state that allows the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ to be freely and openly preached on the streets without fear of arrest and prosecution. Alas, the United States no longer allows the Gospel to be freely and openly preached on the streets, because militant sodomites now control our government, and they violently object to the Bible message.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adl.org/special_reports/wbc/wbc_on_america.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He requested, and received, permission from Hussein to protest  in Iraq. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={91058469-F6DE-4615-8B2A-73CDF3E8FCAC}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lawsuits and Litigation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Phelps and his congregation were recently sued by Albert Snyder, the father of a soldier killed in Iraq. Phelps and his congregation protested the Iraq War at his son's funeral. The father sued for defamation over Phelps' statement: &amp;quot;Mr. Snyder raised his son for the devil and hell,&amp;quot; during the funeral protest and in statements on his website.  A federal jury in Baltimore awarded him nearly $11 million in a verdict against the church; Mr. Snyder won on every count of his complaint, receiving $2.9 million for compensatory damages and $8 million for punitive damages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Phelps has also been threatened with prosecution by the Canadian Government for alleged hate speech in Canada for preaching what he has stated are the literal teachings of the Bible against homosexuality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=15559 Gore sought help from anti-homosexual group], 'God hates fags' creator preaches 'hate because the Bible preaches hate', By Jon E. Dougherty, ''WorldNetDaily.com'', October 25, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Already picketing daily in Topeka, the Phelpses began to shower faxes on the community, targeting business and political leaders they disagreed with. After Topeka councilwoman Beth Mechler publicly doubted Phelps' claims that wild [[gay sex]] was occurring in Gage Park, Phelps responded with an insulting fax.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism of Phelps==&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps has been criticized by a great number of individuals, both conservative and liberal. For example, [[Jerry Falwell]]  referred to Phelps as &amp;quot;a first class nut&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cjonline.com/webindepth/phelps/stories/102498_protests.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Illinois Family Institute Executive Director Peter LaBarbera said &amp;quot;Fred Phelps' curious message is hardly Christian, and only fuels societal bigotry toward those who espouse genuine Biblical views on social issues like homosexuality and abortion,&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eleventh-avenue-south.com/archives/2005/08/fred_phelps_a_p.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps was also cited during Canadian deliberations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/dec/07121806.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; about declaring anti-gay sentiments to be a hate crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Westboro Baptist also is monitored by the Anti-Defamation League.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pickets ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1f3.jpg|right|thumb|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps announced that he and his group would picket the funeral service of actor [[Heath Ledger]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2009, Phelps' group announced that they would travel to the [[United Kingdom]] to protest in [[Basingstoke]] against a gay-themed play called [[The Laramie Project]], based on the murder of [[Matthew Shepard]]. &lt;br /&gt;
However, the British Foreign Secretary [[Jacqui Smith]] later announced on February 19th that they would be barred from entering the country as the group &amp;quot;engaged in unacceptable behaviour by inciting hatred against a number of communities&amp;quot;. Phelps' group later responded with a message on their website GodHatesFags.com stating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;You British Bastards will not have Jesus Christ to rule over you, and think you can issue bans and pass laws to remove God’s word from the landscape. You do greatly err, not knowing the power of God; and, you do that against your own interests. It is a great kindness to have God’s prophets in your land. But, you ungrateful brutes despise knowledge. It is too late for the UK. God Hates You! God’s wrath and destruction is all that’s left for you, thanks to Secretary Smith.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-11226.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite efforts by [[leftist]]s to link Phelps to the Religious Right, Phelps refers to Christian conservatives as &amp;quot;People who have gone a whoring after strange gods.&amp;quot;  Phelps preaching has much in common with the Reverend [[Jeremiah Wright]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Outside links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://blank.org/addict/ Addicted to Hate: the story of Fred Phelps]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4413388146858417528&amp;amp;q=Westboro+Baptist+Church+BBC&amp;amp;total=2&amp;amp;start=0&amp;amp;num=10&amp;amp;so=0&amp;amp;type=search&amp;amp;plindex=0]The Most Hated Family In America&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://toiletpaperonline.typepad.com/the_blog/2006/03/how_much_do_you.html Oh yeah, and he used to be tight with Al Gore]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8194338250744686470# Fred Phelps' Unhinged Video Message to the Cheneys]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.adl.org/poisoning_web/homophobia.asp Poisoning the Web: Hatred Online], Anti-Defamation League (2001). Retrieved 05/23/07. &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.godhatesfredphelps.com/ God Hates Fred Phelps], Retrieved from http://www.godhatesfredphelps.com/ October 25, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8682089528957352638&amp;amp;ei=YB-PSa6HCYbi2gKtgPnCCw&amp;amp;q=fred+phelps+jerry+falwell&amp;amp;hl=en Phelps denouncing] [[Jerry Falwell]] after his death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-war Movements]]	&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Phelps, Fred}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fred_Phelps&amp;diff=832973</id>
		<title>Talk:Fred Phelps</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fred_Phelps&amp;diff=832973"/>
		<updated>2010-12-17T20:56:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Rerequest edit to protected article.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==No linking to Phelps's web sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They are not family appropriate, and Conservapedia is not a repository of hate speech. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:04, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Would it be reasonable to add the prohibition of making and linking to hate speech one of the commandments? --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 17:21, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I think that's an excellent idea. I suggest bringing it up either on Aschlafly's Talk Page or Talk:Conservapedia Commandments. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:22, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: I did not know that I shouldn't have linked to his websites.  However, could you please put into the opening paragraph that Fred Phelps' mission is against homosexuality?  As it is, this important fact is not mentioned until halfway down the page.  [[User:CEinhorn|CEinhorn]] 19:33, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Will do. In fact, I'm going to unprotect this. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 22:55, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely the main authority on Phelps's teachings in Phelps himself? His sites should be linked to. I suggest doing so as plain text, not a clickable link, and alongside a warning notice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Posts not signed are ignored. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:02, 31 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discussion of subject==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to tentatively leave this in place, although it was intended to make Christians look bad by the original creator, he is a major news figure because of his funeral protests, and his actions have prompted major legislation regarding these (and he is also a major embarrassment to my home state, as well as a DEMOCRAT who actually campaigned for Al Gore in 1988 before he went on his anti-homosexual crusade).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I drove by his &amp;quot;church&amp;quot; once and I got a physical chill once I got within two blocks of it. I felt like I was in a place of true evil. Interestingly, the ZIP codes in Topeka, where he lives, all start with 666.  [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 03:26, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Evidently his views changed, judging by his protest of the funeral of Al Gore's father. [[User:RandomishName11|RandomishName11]] 00:42, 18 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just moved it because it was under &amp;quot;Fred phelps,&amp;quot; and the lack of proper capitalization was bothering me. I like to copy edit. :-p [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 03:29, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you looked at the original article as it was written, it contained some crude language. But thanks for working on the capitalization. It bothers me as well when articles are started like that.  [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 03:30, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree with you completely. I didn't want to bother with the article at the time, and I'm glad someone else did. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 03:32, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a more humorous note, [http://www.barzelay.net/files/images/other/phelps.jpg this] was taken outside of Vandy when Phelps came to visit. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 03:52, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw that picture for sale in a liberal store downtown once. It's so funny.&lt;br /&gt;
One of Phelps's lackeys told my friend that his hair was too long once. (I live about 25 miles from Topeka, so we get a lot of him.) [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 03:51, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But everyone knows, Jesus doesn't like long hair... [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 03:52, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This man makes me question the First Amendment, he is just that much of a evil being.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:54, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know. His speech is beyond reasonable and just disgusting. I would guess that a majority of Kansans would support his execution. &lt;br /&gt;
And Colin, you may be thinking of Paul :) [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 03:55, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know the feeling. I'm a huge believer in the importance of the First Amendment, especially free speech, but what he says is just so ridiculous it's hard to believe it's technically allowed. And MD, I was mostly referring to the fact that most men of Jesus' time had &amp;quot;longer&amp;quot; hair. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 04:03, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's what I thought. I don't like to judge other Christians' salvation, but I have to make an exception here for old Freddie. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 04:05, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: OK, I saw you reverted the article back after I added content about the extent of his hate speach.  There needs away for this to be stated, especially if you are going to allow the b.s. about militant homosexuals on the page.  Otherwise this article makes him come across as less insane than he is.--[[User:Jack|Jack]] 18:04, 18 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree. I just don't think that the word &amp;quot;fag&amp;quot; is appropriate for an article on this site. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 20:05, 18 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: The hate crimes against Fred Phelps section is uncited b.s. and I think it should be deleted unless someone can give any evidence beyond Phelps' own paranoia and delusional rantings.  I'm doing you a favor--Fred Phelps is not your friend. --[[User:Jack|Jack]] 11:02, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I'm also taking out the Al Gore contributions part since that isn't cited either. --[[User:Jack|Jack]] 11:04, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal Edits by Jack ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
please push your liberal views in an article about yourself.  This article is about Fred Phelps views, not yours. [[User:RightWolf2|RightWolf2]] 13:01, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Ummmm, liberal views? You say that as if it was a bad thing.  One of the commandments here is that claims need to be properly sourced.  This article is certainly making a lot of excuses regarding one of the most abhorrant men in America today.  He goes to military funerals with signs that say &amp;quot;God Hates F*gs&amp;quot;.  That is an objective, well documented fact.  However, the sysops delete it from the main page.  However, completely unsubstantiated claims by Phelps that HE is the victim of hate crimes is allowed to be left up.  --[[User:Jack|Jack]] 22:05, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The subject of an article and their public statements are reliable sources for an article.   Phelps is preaching the literal statements of the Bible.  In fact, he is at the most extreme end of the spectrum with the limits of free speech I have ever seen.   The article is about his views and him.   And he is certainly notable. [[User:RightWolf2|RightWolf2]] 22:16, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::RightWolf2, please stop editing the article to claim that Phelps is &amp;quot;literally following the Bible&amp;quot;, and please stop attacking Jack.  [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 02:36, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::1.  Not an attack, but a statement of my views.  2. When admins and their buddies start forming cabals to reinforce each other, free editing goes out the window.  3.  I am over 60 years old, I am a competent attorney, and I am not here to rain on anyones parade.  Just to add God's word.  4.  Your views of Phelps are &amp;quot;your views&amp;quot;.  Articles about subjects as controversial as phelps should enshrine &amp;quot;his views&amp;quot;, not everyone elses opinions. [[User:RightWolf2|RightWolf2]] 11:44, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Landover Baptist==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is Fred Phelps' church the inspiration for the Landover Baptist Church website that mocks Christian Extremism?--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 15:57, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:53, 22 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Phelps, although outspoken and outlandish, is far less of a hypocrite than other Christian organizations who claim to be able to determine which verses from the Bible are literal from those that are allegorical.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wow. QED. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 02:19, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With all respect to the fact that it shouldn't be stated on an encyclopedia, Phelps probably is going to Hell. -'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#007FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ames&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 00:42, 31 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Phelps is PRO-FAMILY, not anti-homosexual==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's a reason Dr. Dobson called his institution &amp;quot;Focus on the Family&amp;quot; and not &amp;quot;We Hate Gays&amp;quot;.  There's a reason that it's called the &amp;quot;Family Research Council&amp;quot;.  The people who oppose the homosexual agenda are PRO-FAMILY, not anti-anything.  Even the mainstream media generally recognizes this fact and ignore the moonbats (just like they ignore the moonbats when the moonbats try to label &amp;quot;PRO-lifers&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;ANTI-choicers&amp;quot;).  Even the mainstream media (which has been proven to be overwhelmingly liberal, remember) doesn't call Dr. Dobson a bigot or a homophobe.  So why shouldn't Conservapedia, which was created to espouse the CONSERVATIVE point of view, reflect what even liberals acknowledge?--[[User:Ashens|Ashens]] 02:38, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps isn't a true conservative. He says Bush is going to burn in hell. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 02:39, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Jeeze, conservatives aren't brainless clones who can't disagree!  I strongly disagree with Phelps on this matter, but that doesn't make him a non-conservative!  Besides, the issue isn't whether or not he's conservative, the issue is his PRO-FAMILY &amp;quot;bias&amp;quot;!--[[User:Ashens|Ashens]] 02:46, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*My reading of scripture, perhaps not as advanced as some, tells me if we keep judging, which God has said is his alone to do, we will all be burning. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:37, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with Terry, but as I've learned from much debating with christians, the argument doesn't work. They've chosen to ignore one thing the bible says in order to use another thing the bible says to achieve their goals or to justify their hate.[[User:Nsmyth|NSmyth]] 04:47, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Well, really, in the Grand Scheme of things, it isn't important.  All of us, eventually, will face the harshest, yet most loving Judge in the Universe.  Justifications, and legal arguments won't be allowed, lol. ;-) --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:50, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You can be anti homosexual without being pro-family. The cult Phelps has developed targets and belittles families, he is truely a Bad person in every sense of the word, if he has gotten anything right it has been by way of accident [[User:Opcn|Opcn]] 01:44, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being anti-homosexual is not being pro-family.  It is being pro-YOUR-idea-of-family, and forcing that idea on the rest of the world.  There's a big difference.-'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#007FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ames&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:47, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps is not pro-family, he's pro-hate. There's a difference. His websites are not family-friendly, his sermons are not, nor are his &amp;quot;hymns&amp;quot;, and neither are his images. --[[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:54, 7 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What does Phelps stand for, _besides_ hating gays?  That seems to be his one schtick. And by all accounts, he psychologically and physically abused his OWN family, which doesn't sound too 'pro-family' to me.  [http://blank.org/addict/] (Court evidence--not for the weak of stomach.)  --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 07:56, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If what you say is true, then &amp;quot;pro-family&amp;quot; must oppose homosexuals becasue they asume that homosexuals are &amp;quot;anti-family&amp;quot;. That is not true, it's not the desire of homosexual people to wreck family, they just want personal freedom to have the kind of living arangement they choose. The only reason they have gathered together is because it's their common cause to get that freedom for themselves. I'm pretty certain that if they had those rights, they would leave everyone else alone. &lt;br /&gt;
Homosexuals don't suggest that everyone should be homosexual, that would be stupid, they just want the right to live their lives as they want to, not bothering anyone, and not being bothered by anyone. If God (if he exists) dislikes it it's solely up to him to judge, none of us are entitled to do that. --[[User:Atkins|Atkins]] 23:45, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems that whoever said that in the first place was being a parodist. We definitely don't stand for Phelps's hate here in Kansas, or here at Conservapedia. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:50, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What the #$@% ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page mention nothing about the sick twisted and evil nature of Fred Phelps and his family cult. I don't know how this site can call itself conservative and not utterly denounce someone who celebrates the deaths of our fighting men and women and taunts the families of our brave departed soldiers. I am disgusted that he gets off with one line of criticism. [[User:Opcn|Opcn]] 01:41, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Opcn, I believe the principle at work here is &amp;quot;The Enemy Of My Enemy Is My Friend.&amp;quot;  Which is a very long way from &amp;quot;Love thine enemies&amp;quot; but that was just some liberal claptrap from about 33 AD or so.  [[User:Teresita|Banned User Teresita]] 01:50, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps and Religion == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It's hard to be religious when certain people aren't incinerated by bolts of lightning.&amp;quot; -- Calvin.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 07:46, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== disgusting liberal bias  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
this article is terribly condemning of this man. this is the same kind of p.c. bias crap that made me sick of wikipedia. mr. phelps believes in the same things we all do, so why is this article against hihm? he only believes in the things that jesus taught1!1[[User:Manifestdestiny|Manifestdestiny]] 18:42, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Wrong.  At no time did Jesus ever condemn a soldier, unlike this man.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 18:49, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::but jesus did condemn homosexuals. [[User:Cryingeagles39|Cryingeagles39]] 12:51, 5 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Jesus told everyone in plain terms that if they continued to sin, they would not inherit the Kingdom of Heaven.  His message in the Gospels was that everyone should repent.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:06, 5 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Exactly. Jesus never specifically mentioned homosexuality in the gospels, but he did do what Karajou mentioned, which would encompass all types of sin, including homosexuality.  [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:20, 5 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I do know Jesus commanded that we not judge, or we would be.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:12, 25 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== God Hates Canada ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Didn't Phelps also light a flag on fire in the middle of an airport, thus causing his arrest? [[User:Kazumaru|Kazumaru]] 18:44, 13 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I haven't heard about this! Do you have a link? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:44, 13 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.holysmoke.org/hs02/phelps3.htm] is the best I can find. I was wrong, I guess. Seems he didn't actually get around to torching the flag. [[User:Kazumaru|Kazumaru]] 19:03, 13 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nevermind... &amp;quot;When WBC members did in fact actually burn the Canadian flag in religious protest to Canada's approval of same-sex marriage, the so-called Christians of Canada were the loudest in denouncing WBC and &amp;quot;widely reviling&amp;quot; her Gospel message.&amp;quot; That's from his God Hates Canada page. Appears I was mistaken about the airport thing, though. [[User:Kazumaru|Kazumaru]] 19:09, 13 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps And The Democratic Party ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone please get rid of this header at the bottom of the page? Seems a bit of a stretch to me. --[[User:Ouzo|Ouzo]] 14:35, 11 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think we've addressed your concerns. [http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={91058469-F6DE-4615-8B2A-73CDF3E8FCAC} The &amp;quot;God Hates Fags&amp;quot; Left].  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:06, 11 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Activist!???==&lt;br /&gt;
Last time I checked liberals support gay people and are secular. Calling Fred Phelps a liberal would be akin to calling Osama bin Laden a pacifist. Someone should change this --[[User:AllahuAkbarJihad|AllahuAkbarJihad]] 21:50, 12 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps is not a leftist, he is on the extreme fringes of the religious right, he's an embarrasment to conservatives so he is called a &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;. I can't believe how biased this website is --[[User:AllahuAkbarJihad|AllahuAkbarJihad]] 21:53, 12 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps celebrated the 9/11 attacks and the more recent al-Qaeda strikes in London as the just recompense of Western decadence. He supported Saddam Hussein and has been appreciative to Fidel Castro. Phelps is probably more appropriately described in psychiatric than political terms. '''But his political roots are in the Democratic Party, having run for office in Kansas five times, and actively supported Al Gore in 1988 and 1992, whose campaign used Phelps’ family office space. Son Fred Phelps Jr., who had hosted a fund raiser for Gore, attended the 1993 Clinton-Gore inaugural.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More careful media coverage acknowledges that Phelps’ ostensibly Baptist church is &amp;quot;unaffiliated&amp;quot; and comprised of only his family members, whose compound of houses is assembled around the church and its swimming pool used for baptisms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps, now age 76, has demonstrated outside the Bush Ranch in Crawford, Texas. He has demonstrated against conservative religious activists James Dobson, Jerry Falwell, and Pat Robertson. He has demonstrated against the Southern Baptist Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:41, 13 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if Phelps did support the Democrats at one time, that doesn't make him a liberal. Guiliani is a Republican and he is certainly not a Conservative (pro gay marriage, pro abortion). I'd argue that Phelps is delusional rather than liberal or conservative but I think it is terribly biased and incorrect to state that he is a leftist and a liberal. Liberals tend to be secular and pro gay marriage, Phelps does not embrace liberal values --[[User:Fredphelpsisamoron|Fredphelpsisamoron]] 16:17, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would argue that Phelps is actually a conservative. He is against gay marriage and is very religious, these are two traits of conservatives. --[[User:MichaelM|MichaelM]] 16:44, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I don't buy it sounds more like an anti liberal rant, and is the sort of statement which will atract vandals to this site. Liberals didn't support Saddam, I mean some might of, they just didn't support the war in Iraq, ! [[User:Tubesock|Tubesock]] 17:35, 19 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There is more to conservatism than ONE ISSUE. Economics, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, there are religious liberals out there. Ever heard of Jimmy Carter? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:45, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
True, but Jimmy Carter is only moderatly oppposed to homosexuality and believes in evolution, he is not the same hate filled bigot that Phelps is. Maybe Phelps isn't conservative, but he certainly isn't liberal either. I think saying Phelps is a leftist is POV pushing. It should be taken out. --[[User:MichaelM|MichaelM]] 16:47, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, wait, wait. What does evolution have to do with it? We've had a lot of liberals tell us that we should not be politicizing science. I actually agree with that. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:51, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps doesn't believe in evolution and he believes in creationism. Creationism, particularly YEC is associated with conservatism. I agree that science shouldn't be politicized but creationists, especially YEC, tend to be conservative while evolutionists tend to be moderate or liberal. --[[User:MichaelM|MichaelM]] 16:53, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::OK. So we have evidence liberals may be open minded and tolerant of other views.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:14, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::*There is no such thing, outside of perhaps Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi as 100% Liberals. Guiliani, I might chime in, isn't taking a &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; stance on some issues, but a old line conservative POV, pre-neoconservative, more Libertarian stance. Many of Phelps' idealogical pronouncements most certainly do fit more within the secular-progressive tent than the conservative one.  And one must note there wasn't any repudiation on the part of Citizen Gore when he was happily taking Phelps &amp;amp; Company money and office space, was there? End of argument there.  Point is, Phelps is almost certainly a Demon from Hell. He certainly isn't worthy of anyone's defense, or the attention he is getting.  --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:47, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think any of Phelps stances fit liberalism at all. The use of liberal and leftist is misleading and biased --[[User:JimmyR|JimmyR]] 20:29, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just because he opposes Bush and conservatives doesn't mean that he isn't one of them. Conservatives, like Liberals can have disagreements among one another and are not one monolithic block. Besides Ronald Reagan supported Saddam in the 80s, does that make him a liberal? I think you should take out &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;liberal activist&amp;quot; it is terribly biased and misleading and just makes Conservapedia look bad --[[User:BillCasey|BillCasey]] 10:19, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree.  Phelps is no more a liberal activist than the KKK is a conservative action group. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 11:54, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Exactly, Phelps has been criticized across the political spectrum from leftist gay rights groups to conservative Christians, he is neither liberal or conservative, he is just plain nuts --[[User:BillCasey|BillCasey]] 17:55, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:ok, we know the 'ol &amp;quot;he's a bad guy so he must be a religious conservative&amp;quot; argument is the basis of many Wikipedia articles, and thousands of other websites.  But this is CP, we're basically (1) concerned with facts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, Phelps, a creationist, is an example of a broadminded [[leftist]].  What's wrong with that?  Although some of his views are extraordinarily repugnant, Al &amp;amp; Tipper, in keeping with thier one time advocacy of censoring [[music]] content and being pro-[[big tabacco]], once courted a constituency there.  Gore only dropped these views when the Clintons put him on the ticket.  Perhaps the [[Nobel Prize]] Committee made the award to the wrong guy.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:15, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Al Gore is not really a leftist. More a flip-flop, his views swing from liberal to conservative depending on how the political wind blows. Besides supporting Gore doesn't automatically make Phelps a liberal. I'm not saying you should say he is a conservative. But liberals/conservatives calling those who are repugnant to both groups the group they disagree with is wrong and biased. Both liberals and conservatives oppose Phelps so he should be called neither. --[[User:BillCasey|BillCasey]] 18:22, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:hmmm, so Phelps is [[mainstream]] or [[centrist]]?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:28, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, he's just an extremist. Like the KKK. --[[User:BillCasey|BillCasey]] 18:34, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Very interesting; on [[political spectrum theory]] I once postulated that the theory was useless, and meaningless.  Perhaps Phelps is an example.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 19:00, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If that is the case then I think the word leftist should be taken out, it is misleading and besides Phelps is usually considered part of the Religious Right, whether that is true or not --[[User:DanielJamesRideout|DanielJamesRideout]] 12:26, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, because the so-called &amp;quot;Religious Right&amp;quot; is unfairly defamed, we should pile on in support of liberal fascist objectives.  ''Wiederlich.''   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:48, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conservatives call him liberal and the liberals call him conservative. He is clearly insane. Liberalism and insanity often go together but here insanity crowds everything else out. [[User:SkipJohnson|SkipJohnson]] 12:54, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism and insanity go together, thats a pretty harsh insult for people who you merely have a political disagreement with? Why so much hate? --[[User:NathanRodgers|NathanRodgers]] 12:57, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If it was not for the '''fact''' of Phelps [[political]] [[activism]], in support of [[political]] candidates, or the [[fact]] Phelps ran for [[political]] office on the ticket of a major [[political party]], we would not be having this discusssion.  But given the [[political]] realities, we can only use Phelps own stated [[political]] affilliations.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:48, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes it is true that Phelps was associated with the Democrats but remember that at one time the Democrats were the &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; party. The Democrats are now supportive or at least tolerant of homosexuals and Phelps has referred to his former friend Al Gore as a &amp;quot;Fag-enabler&amp;quot;. There aren't too many differences between Republicans and Democrats anyways. I think that leftist and liberal activist should be taken out, other than that the article is fine. --[[User:NathanRodgers|NathanRodgers]] 14:48, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You say &amp;quot;was associated.&amp;quot;  We have no basis for that.  It was Al Gore who shifted, not Phelps.  And we have no reason to believe Gore publicly shifted other than [[career opportunism]], not any personal, inner, [[moral]] change in his fundamental beliefs.  Further, we have ample evidence Gore has both consistently, and persistently, been less then ingenuous in his own personal, inner convictions since pursuing a path of personal career opportunism. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:42, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think anyone with a natural mind can see that Phelps openly supports an agenda that is complicated. However, as Rob eloquently sated above, he ran as a [[Democrat]]. This fact is undeniable. Now, if anyone else wants to take issue with that, that's fine, but I would advise that this is a waste of everyone's time and ought to be a bannable offense. The &amp;quot;but but but&amp;quot; crowd needs to grow up and acept that this guy is one of their own. [[User:Mathers|ItMathers]] 17:56, 19 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Lj105.jpg|thumb|250px|right|According to liberal authors, Fred Phelps &amp;quot;self-identifies as a Democrat.&amp;quot; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm not sure it's quite as simple as that, Mathers. As I understand it, membership of either the Republican or Democrat Party in the States requires no specific ideology and often is simply a matter of publically stating your preference. As Stephen Colbert demonstrated recently, it's even possible to be a member of both! It's a bit of a stretch then to say that Democrats en masse (or liberals, for that matter) consider him 'one of their own'. It might be more accurate to say that Phelps &amp;quot;self-identifies as a Democrat&amp;quot;, and elsewhere in the article that &amp;quot;Phelps has been criticized by conservatives and liberals alike&amp;quot;. Is there any way we can modify the page to reflect this? [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 23:23, 7 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Very funny. Seriously though guys, could an admin modify the text? I imagine it'd save a lot of bickering on this Talk page. [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 23:23, 11 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Very well said, Mathers!  --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:33, 19 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:*I don't understand why libs have trouble with the idea that libs hate; seems to be an everyday occurance.  I've experienced it daily for 40 years.  Look at Ann Coulter.  Libs cannot restrain spewing their hatred toward her.  Or Rush. Or O'Reilly, Falwell, Bush, the list is endless.  Why is it such a shock to libs that liberals spew hate?   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 23:39, 11 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Democrat (or at least ex-Democrat), sure. But liberal?==&lt;br /&gt;
Describing Phelps as a Democrat is justifiable, since he did run as a Democrat, but the first sentence dexcribes him as a &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot;, which I believe is the same as &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;. This seems flawed. Not all Democrats are liberal and vice versa (anyone remember Zell Miller? Reagan and Thurmond were both Democrats once too). Looking at Conservapedia's own definition of [[liberal]] we have the following specific views how many of them apply to Phelps?&lt;br /&gt;
#denial of inherent gender differences, leading to things such as allowing men and women to have the same jobs in the military (while quietly holding them to different standards)&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence that he feels this way&lt;br /&gt;
#taxpayer-funded abortion&lt;br /&gt;
#:Certainly not&lt;br /&gt;
#same-sex marriage&lt;br /&gt;
#:HA!&lt;br /&gt;
#support of affirmative action&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence of this&lt;br /&gt;
#support of political correctness&lt;br /&gt;
#:Not at all&lt;br /&gt;
#censorship of prayer in classrooms&lt;br /&gt;
#:No&lt;br /&gt;
#compelled taxpayer funding of government schools for nearly all ages&lt;br /&gt;
#:Hard to say, but publicly funded schools are hardly a liberal issue; there is widespread support for them. Most people do not want to completely privatize education.&lt;br /&gt;
#government-controlled medical care&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence of this&lt;br /&gt;
#labor unions&lt;br /&gt;
#:no evidence of this&lt;br /&gt;
#elimination of abstinence-only program funding&lt;br /&gt;
#:Given his religious views, this seems unlikely&lt;br /&gt;
#income redistribution, usually through progressive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence of this&lt;br /&gt;
#a &amp;quot;living Constitution&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted rather than an unchanging Constitution as written&lt;br /&gt;
#:No idea. He'd probably support a &amp;quot;living constitution&amp;quot; if interpretations of the document would harm the homosexual agenda, but against it if it would promote it. &lt;br /&gt;
#support for gun control&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidnce for this (seems unlikely)&lt;br /&gt;
#government programs to rehabilitate criminals&lt;br /&gt;
#:No idea&lt;br /&gt;
#environmentalism&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence for this&lt;br /&gt;
#disarmament treaties&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence (this guy seems not to be much of a foreign policy wonk, except when it comes to praising anti-gay foreign leaders)&lt;br /&gt;
#globalism&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence of this (except for global condemnation of homosexuality)&lt;br /&gt;
#opposition to a strong American foreign policy&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence&lt;br /&gt;
#support of obscenity and pornography as a First Amendment right&lt;br /&gt;
#:Seems unlikely&lt;br /&gt;
#opposition to full private property rights&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence of this&lt;br /&gt;
#limit conservative talk radio by reinstating the Fairness Doctrine&lt;br /&gt;
#:Seems unlikely that he'd want to do anything to aid the pro-gay liberal media&lt;br /&gt;
So he basically has no discernable liberal traits. This does not make him a conservative, but it really seems he's not a leftist. The only things that point to his leftism are running as a Democrat (who can say why he picked one party over the other? He didn't have much suport from either, it seems) and his support for Gore (dropped when it turned out Gore's views on homosexuality were more liberal than the previously appered). Since Democrat is not the same as liberal, I'm not sure how the latter applies to him. Can anyone justify the inclusion of the term leftist? If someone can point out statements he's made supporting strong environmentalism, opposition to gun rights, disarmament treaties, property rights opposition, or such a case could certainly be made, but right now I'm not seeing any real leftism here. [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 10:51, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; portion is cited.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:14, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry, but I don't see it. I see citations for the Democrat part, which isn't the issue. Can point out the specific citation to me? [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 14:47, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={91058469-F6DE-4615-8B2A-73CDF3E8FCAC}] Perhaps we need [[CP:Common knowledge]].  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:12, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sorry, but that doesn't clear anything up. Nowhere does that piece call Phelps &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; (even if it did, it would be the opinion of a journalist). We've established his conection to the Democratic Party, but where's his liberalism?  This site has 21 examples of liberal traits, which does he meet? His anti-gay agenda shapes his opinions on all other matters. If supporting Castro makes him a liberal, what about condemning Sweden (The most socialist state in Europe)? I think everyone can agree that hating gays is not a  trait that makes one liberal, and that is about the only trait he has. I think the guy defies all aspects of the traditional left/right spectrum, and I don't see the point of trying to pigeonhole him into one group. By all means this article should disassociate him from the Christian wing of the conservative movement, but that doesn't by definition make him liberal. Is there a source that shows how he meets even ''one'' of the 21 examples bove (and he'd need to meet more than one to be classified as a liberal)? [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 15:42, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::So, were back to the definition &amp;quot;a liberal is a leftist,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a leftist is a liberal.&amp;quot;  We were attacked by cyberterrorists for months trying to put that stuff in.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Liberals don't hate?  Please....And nowhere in the text does it say Phelps is a liberal.  He is in Cat:Liberal activists, and a strong case can be made that he belongs there.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:07, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I know nothing about cyberterrorists and such, but I was sort of under the impression that liberal and leftist were sort of interchangable. This site's own article says that leftist is associated with &amp;quot;social democracy, liberalism, or the several strains of socialism and communism. It may also be applied to those who oppose conservative politics. The word 'liberal' is often used in the US to mean 'leftist'. But this is inconsistent with the original meaning of the word liberal.&amp;quot; I see nothing socialist or communist about Phelps (support for Castro is based solely on his anti-gay stance, not his economics), nor any real connection with social democracy. In this country it ''is'' basically interchangable with &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; (classical liberalism is out of the scope of this issue), so calling him a leftist is much the same as calling him a liberal. And note that I never said liberals don't hate, I said that hating gays is not a liberal trait. Are you trying to argue that it is? I think that would be an uphill battle, but feel free to try. And by the way, calling him a liberal activist ''is'' calling him a liberal (just like saying someone is a Mexican footballer is saying he is Mexican, and a footballer). So if he isn't a liberal but is a leftist, what is it that makes him a leftist (and how is that different from the standard definition of liberal that the 21 points illustrate)? [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 16:28, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::&amp;quot;calling him a leftist is much the same as calling him a liberal,&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Where in the text does it say this?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:37, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Okay, if the two are not synonymous (or nearly so), then explain the difference. I think I'm not alone in thinking the two terms are so close as to be basically interchangable. The [[leftist]] article here is pretty unclear on just about all aspects of the term, and does not draw any real distinctions between liberal and leftist. The article even states &amp;quot;The word 'liberal' is often used in the US to mean 'leftist'&amp;quot;, and since this is an American encyclopedia, aimed at the layman, it seems that if you're going to use the term in different way than it is often used you should make that distinctly clear. If the article means to say he is a leftist but not a liberal then the difference between the two should be explicitly stated, and how he fits into the category &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; should also be made clear. Furthermore, if he isn't a liberal he should be removed from the liberal activists category, and his entry should be removed from the [[liberal hate speech]] article. [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 00:40, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::*''I think I'm not alone in thinking the two terms are so close as to be basically interchangable.''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::*Congratulations, and ''good for you.''  Unfortuneatly, like the [[theory of evolution]], you can not impose your [[moral]]ity on me, and ''force'' me to accept the [[political spectrum theory]].  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:47, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[unindenting] Well, this very site says the two terms are often used interchangably, and I have no idea what evolution and imposition of morality have to do with anything, so we'll let that bit rest. So I'll ask the questions I'd like to see addressed, and I'll number them to make it easy:&lt;br /&gt;
:1. What is the difference between a leftist and a liberal, as used in this case?&lt;br /&gt;
:2. How is Phelps a leftist? What specific opinions does he hold that make him such?&lt;br /&gt;
:3. If he is not a liberal, why is he in the liberal activist category, and used as an example of liberal hate speech?&lt;br /&gt;
I'll wait for a reply. [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 00:57, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Here it is, Troll:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * BillyFranco (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 04:57, 23 October 2007) (Earliest: 14:51, 22 October 2007) [6]&lt;br /&gt;
    * Briantrust (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 20:35, 20 October 2007) (Earliest: 15:54, 19 October 2007) [3]&lt;br /&gt;
    * AuH2O (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 16:34, 20 October 2007) (Earliest: 14:59, 20 October 2007) [3]&lt;br /&gt;
 IP: 24.29.72.31 Schenectady, NY,United States&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Here is yet another shining example of liberal [[deceit]].  They cannot even argue honestly.  They need socks to hide their dishonesty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Godspeed to you! --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:47, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;RobS high fives TK&amp;gt;; By thier fruits ye shall know them.  Defenders &amp;amp; apologists is usually a dead give away.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:24, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Activist? (Edit Break)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I despise Liberals but I have to agree with this loonie leftie this time, Phelps is definetly not a liberal even though he was (or possibly still is) a member of the Democratic Party. Besides what's wrong with protesting homosexuality anyways? I just think he carries it too far thats all --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 16:22, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ahaha, typical liberal behaviour lol. Still though, I don't think Phelps is a liberal. He certainly isn't conservative either but calling him a liberal when he clearly isn't just makes Conservapedia look bad.--[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 17:59, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did you at all read the material RobS provided?  --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:13, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not yet, I'll take a look at it and make my decision on Phelps' political views then --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 18:25, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've taken a look at some of the things Rob has said, Phelps is or was a democrat but he is liberal only in name. His views are not liberal at all. I don't care what he says about homosexuality, it is a sin after all, Phelps just goes a little too nutty over it. My issue with him is the disrespect of American soldiers and his criticism of Bush. Bush is in no way a &amp;quot;fag-enabler&amp;quot; and is quite critical of homosexuality. Phelps is not firing on all cylinders though, thats for sure. --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 18:40, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Konserva... the guy above me, Phelps doesn't really qualify as a leftist/liberal. I mean, if he joined the Republican party, would we even be discussing this? There are probably quite a few rogues if we look hard enough into each party's details. maybe Charles Manson believed in a weak federal government and strong gun ownership rights. Does that alone make him a Conservative? At the end of the day, I think the blush is off his liberal democrat rose. [[User:Mathers|ItMathers]] 18:49, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is pretty easy, as RobS says, to get people to reveal themselves! --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:23, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, I will say I'm happy he's on their side. ;) [[User:Mathers|ItMathers]] 19:36, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::We should probably give credit to the watchdog organizations that single out and trash Phleps, it gives them credibility and balance, shows they are capable of broadminded thinking, and not mindless partisan trolls.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 23:54, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If these watchdog groups are liberal, they will likely just throw Phelps in with conservatives. While I don't think Phelps is a liberal, his anti-war activities and support of Castro make him exempt from being classified as a conservative. I don't think Phelps falls neatly into either category and both liberals and conservatives are accusing him of being in the other camp because nobody wants him --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 00:05, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*''If these watchdog groups are liberal, they will likely just throw Phelps in with conservatives.''&lt;br /&gt;
:*They've obviously done that.  This is why CP exists, this is closely related to one of our core missions, to counter these slanders of conservatives &amp;amp; conservative views by leftist ideological slander factories.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:09, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree, the media has a terrible liberal bias along with these watchdog groups. Phelps is delusional, he is neither liberal or conservative. I still think we should leave political labels out of the description (other than his support for Al Gore which is documented fact), it will just make Conservapedia look bad and give those whiney liberals something else to complain about --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 00:12, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Where does the media get thier impressions and opinion about Phelps?  From these watchdog organizations -- you never would have heard of Phelps otherwise.  Then the media &amp;amp; watchdog organizations also are actively engaged in an agenda, pushing [[gay rights]] and the [[homosexual agenda]], for example.  Where does the opposition to this agenda come from? Church people.  Who is Phelps &amp;amp; what is his organization? He's a preacher &amp;amp; preaches at a church.  ''Voila!''  We have more right-wing, neofascist, hate-mongering Christain Coalition homophobic bigots that need to be exterminated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, his views are Democrat, on the left, and quite in the tradition of stupid, pointless, [[liberal activism]] designed for no other reason than to get people angry, and draw publicity.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:22, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just because someone is democrat doesn't mean that they are liberal. Bob Novak was a democrat --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 18:31, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Bob Novak is and was pretty liberal on many things, so a poor example. ;-) -- --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:45, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bob Novak liberal? I don't find him that liberal. He is pro-Iraq war and anti-socialized-medicine. Perhaps he is not as conservative as most Republicans but he is certainly more conservative than the vast majority of democrats and some Republicans too. Also Al and Tipper Gore weren't always as liberal as they claim they are today. They were both in favour of censoring violent and explicit lyrics of rappers and Al Gore was anti-homosexual at one point. They only distanced themselves from Phelps when it became politically expedient. They didn't mind his money though. Still the point is as much as a nut as Phelps is, he isn't really a liberal and it is misleading to label him that. He is opposed to the homosexual agenda, is antiabortion, antievolution, and is religious. While he may share the anti-war sentiment of the left, his reasons for doing so are completely different. I think it is misleading to label him a leftist and we don't want to be guilty of bias like Wikipedia is --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 13:42, 25 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Maybe I need to teach a class or something, helping liberals do parody of conservatives. :S --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:42, 25 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You think Phelps is actually a liberal pretending to hate homosexuals to make conservatives look bad? I don't think he's intelligent enough to think of such a scheme. Liberals are usually pretty stupid. --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 16:25, 25 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Phelps is a Demon, not a Human. Important difference. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:45, 25 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Fred Phelps is NOT left-wing==&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Fred Phelps a closet liberal&amp;quot; source is merely a discussion in relation to an article, it is not a valid source and should be removed. The left support gays and anti-homosexuality adovocates clearly belong on the right whether they are democrat or republican. --[[User:ChavezFan|ChavezFan]] 16:41, 29 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Do all left-wingers [[fascism|goosestep]] to the [[gay agenda]]?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:14, 30 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::They Pretty much do, liberalism and homosexuality go hand in hand, stupid liberals. Talk about Groupthink hahahaha --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 19:45, 30 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I thought liberalism was the [[big tent]]? You mean everyone has to tow the party line, and there is no tolerance for [[diversity]]?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 20:29, 30 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Liberals are very intolerant of conservative viewpoints. While they are tolerant of nearly all religions (except Christianity) they are very intolerant of anyone who criticizes homosexuality or political correctness. Liberals are highly ideological. Trust me, I come from a country full of these pinkos --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 21:33, 30 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Does it really matter? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trying to associating Fred Phelps with the right or the left is ridiculous. Neither of them like him. The whole political spectrum wouldn't mind a meteorite taking out the Westboro Baptist Church compound (preferably with the whole congregation/family inside) It's deceptive and ridiculous to try to associate him with anyone as a means of discrediting them: Democrats hate him, Baptists hate him, Christian fundamentalists hate him, the ACLU hates him. Gays hate him, US soldiers hate him, Mary Cheney hates him, Swedes hate him, Al Gore hates him, 9/11 victims hate him. Who knows, '''maybe God Hates Fred Phelps'''. So please, have some '''common sense''' and remove the deceptive references to leftist, liberal, and the anti-war movement. - [[User:PostoStudanto|PostoStudanto]] [[User_talk:PostoStudanto| &amp;amp;#x2709;Tλlk]] 23:13, 8 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. One of the blog links is broken.&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, your [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fred_Phelps&amp;amp;diff=330569&amp;amp;oldid=330497 removal] of my remarks against Fred Phelps was totally uncalled for and not remotely related to policy. {{tl|Remove personal remark}} is for attacks on fellow editors, not going after the subject of an article. From what I've seen on Conservapedia, going after a [[Hillary Rodham Clinton|subject]] is acceptable anywhere. No personal attacks itself isn't even well enforced, for that matter. For example, you told someone to &amp;quot;get a chiropractor to help get your foot out of your mouth&amp;quot; on [[Talk:Al Gore]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Oops, forgot my sig yesterday [[User:PostoStudanto|PostoStudanto]] [[User_talk:PostoStudanto| &amp;amp;#x2709;Tλlk]] 22:41, 15 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Trying to associating Fred Phelps with the right or the left is ridiculous.''&lt;br /&gt;
Seconded - ''(the following is reposted, since it seems to have escaped the sysops' attention. Apologies.)''&lt;br /&gt;
As I understand it, membership of either the Republican or Democrat Party in the States requires no specific ideology and often is simply a matter of publically stating your preference. As Stephen Colbert demonstrated recently, it's even possible to be a member of both! It's a bit of a stretch then to say that Democrats en masse (or liberals, for that matter) consider him 'one of their own'. It might be more accurate to say that Phelps &amp;quot;self-identifies as a Democrat&amp;quot;, and elsewhere in the article that &amp;quot;Phelps has been criticized by conservatives and liberals alike&amp;quot;. Is there any way we can modify the page to reflect this? [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 23:14, 15 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Fred Phelps is a leftist anti-homosexual behavior activist and liberal Democrat&amp;quot;== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original post by [[User:ModerateCatholic|ModerateCatholic]] on the [[Talk:Main Page|Main Page Talk]]. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 18:45, 14 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Since the article is locked, and several people have appealed for it to be changed on the talk page but ignored, I thought it best to put it here in order to garner some sort of consensus. Is Fred Phelps a Liberal? Picketing funerals of soldiers killed in Iraq because their country supposedly supports the 'homosexual agenda' is markedly illiberal. It needs change. [[User:ModerateCatholic|ModerateCatholic]] 16:54, 14 December 2007 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here, also, is the ensuing discussion on the main page. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 14:57, 28 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''As a veteran, I find Fred Phelps' actions to be reprehensible and despicable.  The very freedom that allowed him and his ilk to protest in that manner was provided by the life of the soldier he's protesting.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 09:58, 15 December 2007 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''Nobody likes [[Fred Phelps]], we know that. But that doesn't mean he can be branded a [[liberal]] just for being despicable - does it? Apparently he has some history with the [[Democratic Party]], but his actual views don't seem very &amp;quot;liberal Democrat&amp;quot; to me. Perhaps he doesn't really fit into any political category? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 11:12, 15 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::''Even if he was a staunch Republican and conservative, there is absolutely no call for his actions.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 11:28, 15 December 2007 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
::''Agreed (though I hope it didn't seem that I was trying to imply he was!) [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 17:30, 15 December 2007 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
''In light of Andy's recent comments about non-linear political alignment, I would recommend that the &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; statement be redacted, and something to the effect of &amp;quot;Fred Phelps' political alignment seems to fall outside of any political category&amp;quot;. --[[User:SimonA|SimonA]] 16:07, 15 December 2007 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
''Given that advancing the homosexual agenda is a defining characteristic of Democrats and Liberals, it's hard to see how being so opposed to homosexuals would make him a Democrat or a Liberal. I looked over the article on him, and it said he did run to be the democrat nominee but didn't win. Maybe there are races where he did win the nomination, but just running doesn't mean the democrats support him. I mean, I would never call Ron Paul a republican but here he is running as one.[[User:TRipp|TRipp]] 16:28, 15 December 2007 (EST)''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Another example why any moralistic person should avoid this site like a plague. [[User:ModerateCatholic|ModerateCatholic]] 12:55, 28 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The word &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; should be removed from the first sentence ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is fine to characterize him as democrat, since this is documented, but characterizing him as a &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; is far from documented, or universally accepted.  If there are people that feel that is the case, then it is worth a section in the article, however placing a controversial and undocumented piece of information in the first sentence, discredits the article as a whole.--[[User:PhineasBogg|PhineasBogg]] 23:21, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wholeheartedly agree, and I think there's a clear consensus on this point. I will request the page to be unlocked so that we can edit it. [[User:Walton One|Walton One]] 11:40, 18 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps and the Bible ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article has a lot of condemnatory language about him from a secular standpoint, but it should also say what's wrong with him from a Biblical standpoint, citing chapter and verse. [[User:DavidE|DavidE]] 10:37, 12 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree. How about starting with 1 Corinthians 6:9-11? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:44, 18 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Am I the only one? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone else thinks Fred Phelps looks like the Reverand Kane from the Poltergiest movies?  {{unsigned|Jedisqrl}}&lt;br /&gt;
: Or does Reverend Kane look like Fred Phelps (deliberately)?  (I don't know what either looks like, so I'm offering no opinion).  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:08, 8 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::You're definitely [http://msunderestimated.com/PhelpsKane.jpg not alone]! [[User:StatsMsn|StatsMsn]] 09:48, 8 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I doubt the Poltergeist movies were influenced by Phelps, considering they well pre-date his rise to prominence. I suppose its possible, that Phelps intentionally tries to look like him, if the idea that he's actually running some sort of performance art piece and/or massive parody of Christian fundamentalism is true, but I doubt that's the case. [[User:ArthurA|ArthurA]] 13:07, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;First class nut&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have heard and seen this before, but I have been unable to find a source attributing this particular quote. Anyone care to help me out? [[User:EelisA|EelisA]] 16:46, 14 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Not liberal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He's not a liberal, if he opposes homosexuality. But I don't think of him as a conservative: more of a radical fundamentalist. He's the [[gay rights movement]]'s poster boy for [[intolerance]], a potent justification for using the label &amp;quot;[[homophobia]]&amp;quot; to describe all the opposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it would help our cause to distance ourselves from him. In particular the motto, &amp;quot;God hates fags&amp;quot; is not a conservative idea. Recall, &amp;quot;[[God hates sin but loves the sinner]]&amp;quot;. Our heavenly Father has a [[parental heart]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:00, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I would argue that Phelps is actually insane, in the clinical sense of the word. Its unfair to attempt to attach any mainstream political label to him -- people all across the political spectrum reject him. [[User:ArthurA|ArthurA]] 13:03, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::^This. To be honest, this also goes for people like Hitler; people who are so left-wing they go off the edge and appear on the right, people who are neither left nor right but up or down. There's some people you can't classify other than 'insane'. [[User:ETrundel|ETrundel]] 13:24, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Careful, now. Whenever an online discussion starts to mention Hitler, that's like touching the third rail in the subway. The power of his shocking works overwhelm us, and we stop thinking clearly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps is only wrong in his idea that God &amp;quot;punishes&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;hates&amp;quot; homosexuals. This is not to say that he's wrong about homosexuality being a sin. A lot of support for Communism is based on a high ethical idea that no one should monopolize the nation's wealth at the expense of the poor. They only go wrong in the way they want to solve the [[unequal distribution]] problem: i.e., &amp;quot;kill the capitalists and steal their loot!&amp;quot; [http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:JwqaZFQvOtMJ:www.cusd.chico.k12.ca.us/~bsilva/projects/russia/Radzinsky%2520Stalin.doc+bolsheviks+steal+loot&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ct=clnk&amp;amp;cd=5&amp;amp;gl=us&amp;amp;client=firefox-a] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We need to solve economic problems that Capitalism and Communism have not been able to eliminate. Ethical means, however, must be used. Likewise, we need to solve the problem of [[immorality]] (and not only [[homosexuality]: there's a lot of heterosexual sin, such as [[adultery]]); yet an attitude of hatred and hostility towards people is not likely to solve the [[free love]] problem. It could make it worse. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:40, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd say he's wrong about considerably more than just his idea that God hates homosexuals, Ed.  Remember that Phelps and his flock are virulently anti-American and celebrate the deaths of American soldiers and Americans in general.  A number of his faithful recently turned up in Buffalo to picket memorial services for those who died on Flight 3407; his daughter claimed in an interview that the plane crashed as punishment for not giving more credit to God for the Miracle on the Hudson.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 16:47, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, one cannot diagnose &amp;quot;insanity&amp;quot; without a medical degree, you know.  I never supported or endorsed Al Gore for President. I never donated any of my personal property for a Gore campaign headquarters. I wonder who is the liberal then, me, or Fred Phelps who actually is a Gore supporter?  It's not exactly rocket science, but I do see lots of liberals squirming and parsing words, and making up all kinds of caveats to somehow spin it Phelps isn't one!  --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:14, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And Ronald Reagan was once a Democrat. Prominent conservative activist David Horowitz was a gen-yoo-wine Marxist during the Sixties. Lots of people change their views throughout their lives. But I don't think he calls himself a Democrat now, and I doubt anyone in the party welcome him if he tried to become active again. You can't eternally classify someone by the views they once held. And yes, at one time, Phelps labeled himself as a Democrat, and was involved in the party. &lt;br /&gt;
::: And yes, I am not formerly qualified to diagnose Phelps as insane (and even someone who does have the qualification would have to spend time interviewing him.) However, from what I've read about Phelps, he apparently had a severe problem with amphetamines at one time (back in the days when they were &amp;quot;diet pills&amp;quot;. The children that are estranged from the family report he beat them with the handle of a mattock (very close to an axe handle, or, to put it more simply, a really thick piece of wood.) He believes that ''only'' the members of his church are saved. I think that all points to some serious mental illness. [[User:ArthurA|ArthurA]] 08:49, 27 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::He may be a liberal, an insane one who carves his own niche in the political spectrum but a liberal all the same, but I dont think he's a Gore supporter any more. He was back when he believed Gore had a more anti-homosexual agenda, but now he strongly opposes Gore, and other Democratic figureheads like the Clintons. Any chance he'd be considered a populist or totalitarian? [[User:TPerry|TPerry]] 19:42, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Populist? Not at all. He argues that only members of his church are saved, and every other human being is going to Hell. That's not populist in any way; its about as elitist as could be imagined. Totalitarian? Hard to say, considering outside of his obsessions with homosexuals and how the government should treat them, I don't think he comments much on how a government should be structured. I wouldn't be surprised to learn he'd support a form of totalitarian theocracy, though, with himself as a priest-king. [[User:ArthurA|ArthurA]] 11:09, 27 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I consider him an enemy of America, personally.  That's about all the label he requires, in my book.--[[User:Benp|Benp]] 19:57, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The problem is with terminology and definitions.  &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; are terms that encompass a whole bag of issues and views, including political, economic, and religious.  There are many people who are &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in some areas and &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; in other areas (even though, in some cases, their views may appear to be or may actually be contradictory).  Although I'd agree that someone who opposed homosexuality is likely to be a conservative, that is not the sole factor defining a conservative.  If they are mostly but not completely one way or the other, they might be called a &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; liberal or conservative.  But some, like Phelps from what I can gather, fit neatly in neither.  But this is only a problem if one believes that &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; between them cover all possibilities.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:13, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:ArthurA, that great site of errors- Wikipedia, list Phelps as a Democrat. The reason that conservatives to want to label him a Democrat is the fact that 'we Christians' are appalled by his actions. It is so easy for our religious opponents to say...another fundie right-winger, when the whole mess that exists is truly non-Christian, non-conservative. Naturally, nobody likes to be associated with this guy but unfortunately, everybody is.--[[User:Jpatt|jpatt]] 13:03, 27 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: So Wikipedia lists Phelps as a Democrat, and Wikipedia's full of errors, so does that mean that he's not a Democrat?&lt;br /&gt;
:: People do change their views, and I find it hard to imagine either main American party endorsing him, but is there any evidence of him changing his Democratic allegiance?  Wikipedia's references to him being a Democrat seem to be based on him standing as one in various elections, the last of which was eleven years ago.  Yes, he could have changed his mind since then, but the claim would be a lot more convincing if the last connection with the Democrats was, say, 30 years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
:: Being appalled by his actions is not justification for labelling him in any group.  Yes, it is easy for anti-Christians to cite his as a Christian, but them being wrong on that doesn't mean that we can therefore do similar in return and group him with the Democrats simply because we don't want him grouped with us.&lt;br /&gt;
:: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 17:30, 27 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Perhaps the best solution is not to dwell on how he should be labeled, but to simply acknowledge that his position is not Christian and not worthy of notice.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 17:56, 27 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Proof that Phelps is not a liberal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said so himself on the FAQ of his website, godhatesfags.com. In the FAQ, he openly denounces Republicans, but says that liberals are even worse. [[User:AjitJ|AjitJ]] 09:20, 11 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
== Unlock this page ==&lt;br /&gt;
I think this page should be unlocked&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that so? Well, you've made an excellent argument. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 11:09, 31 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== He's not a liberal, and he has said so himself ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page should be altered to reflect that. See, &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://www.godhatesfags.com/faq.html#Right here]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; he says, in reply to a question regarding his views on the Religious Right:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
They spend more time harrassing people who are preaching the Gospel than anything else, just like the Pharisees did to Jesus. They are '''second in evil''' only to the modern day Saduccees (i.e., bleeding heart '''liberals'''). ''(my emphasis)''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why does the article even claim such a thing? It's clearly false. [[User:AlanR|AlanR]] 08:20, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Interesting point. Only the link you provide does not say what you say it says. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 09:15, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::RobSmith, are you accusing AlanR of misquoting? Because otherwise it's pure logic that someone who calls liberals more evil than conservatives would not be himself a liberal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Since this page rightly calls out liberals for trying &amp;quot;to link Phelps to the Religious Right,&amp;quot; it's hypocritical to label him a liberal when the evidence suggests otherwise. Or do you have some other evidence for this claim? [[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 10:41, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think we've shown his intolerance and close mindedness.  What more liberal traits do we have to prove?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:16, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Self-promotion, attention-grabbing, interpreting the Bible any way he wants? Check, check, check! [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 16:18, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Against the war in Iraq, hates the troops. support from the ACLU--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:21, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He is a political opportunist, at the very least, and that is a sign of liberalism.  The undisputed fact he once supported Al Gore, and that was back in the day only liberals would have considered it, brands him for what he is. I cannot believe anyone is still questioning the appellation!   I assume the user would also question labeling Nazi's as leftists, Communism as a tool for mass murder and Planned Parenthood as racist progressives and [[Eugenicists]].  You should open your mind to the truth, because it will set you free! --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:38, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:He also spreads what has been described as 'hate speech'. This is a clear liberal trait. Conservatives are only Anti-homosexual because we know that the Lord would want them to see the light. Stop trying to whitewash by claiming he is not a liberal- this is typical liberal deceit. [[User:Myrobi|Myrobi]] 17:18, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Do you really believe that?  I know conservatives who are anti-homosexual agenda, I know Christians who oppose homosexuality on Biblical grounds, but I have never met conservatives who dislike Gay people, in general. Maybe you meant conservatives are anti-homosexuality? --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:42, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Everyone is missing the point. It doesn't matter what the editors consider him to be, it's how he identifies himself and how other sources identify him. I thought this was supposed to be an encyclopedia? That's what encyclopedias do, they report the facts. And the facts say that Phelps considers liberals to be evil, no external source considers Phelps to be a liberal, and the listing him as &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; here is just an attempt to remove his stigma from the conservative side. You all need to grow up and face the facts, whether or not they're on your side. [[User:HyglacQ|HyglacQ]] 11:42, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::''it's how he identifies himself and '''how other sources identify him'''''&lt;br /&gt;
::What? We're somehow subhuman [[untermensch]] and how CP defines him doesn't count?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:15, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Beating a dead horse HyglacQ, I guess you will discount all facts. 9 out of 10 crazies come from the leftside of politics.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 11:47, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Sorry TK, I meant Anti-homosexuality, as conservatives are against it on principle, but without discriminating against those who are different. After all, we aren't liberals. HyglacQ, I have reported you for spreading liberal lies, make useful edits or take your leftism elsewhere. [[User:Myrobi|Myrobi]] 11:49, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Outside links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Fred Phelps' Unhinged Video Message to the Cheneys&amp;quot; link does not work. The following link does. Please will an admin change it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8194338250744686470#&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks. [[User:Barclay|Barclay]] 15:56, 17 December 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fred_Phelps&amp;diff=832746</id>
		<title>Talk:Fred Phelps</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fred_Phelps&amp;diff=832746"/>
		<updated>2010-12-15T20:19:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Request edit on protected page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==No linking to Phelps's web sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They are not family appropriate, and Conservapedia is not a repository of hate speech. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:04, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Would it be reasonable to add the prohibition of making and linking to hate speech one of the commandments? --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 17:21, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I think that's an excellent idea. I suggest bringing it up either on Aschlafly's Talk Page or Talk:Conservapedia Commandments. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:22, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: I did not know that I shouldn't have linked to his websites.  However, could you please put into the opening paragraph that Fred Phelps' mission is against homosexuality?  As it is, this important fact is not mentioned until halfway down the page.  [[User:CEinhorn|CEinhorn]] 19:33, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Will do. In fact, I'm going to unprotect this. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 22:55, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely the main authority on Phelps's teachings in Phelps himself? His sites should be linked to. I suggest doing so as plain text, not a clickable link, and alongside a warning notice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Posts not signed are ignored. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:02, 31 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discussion of subject==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to tentatively leave this in place, although it was intended to make Christians look bad by the original creator, he is a major news figure because of his funeral protests, and his actions have prompted major legislation regarding these (and he is also a major embarrassment to my home state, as well as a DEMOCRAT who actually campaigned for Al Gore in 1988 before he went on his anti-homosexual crusade).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I drove by his &amp;quot;church&amp;quot; once and I got a physical chill once I got within two blocks of it. I felt like I was in a place of true evil. Interestingly, the ZIP codes in Topeka, where he lives, all start with 666.  [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 03:26, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Evidently his views changed, judging by his protest of the funeral of Al Gore's father. [[User:RandomishName11|RandomishName11]] 00:42, 18 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just moved it because it was under &amp;quot;Fred phelps,&amp;quot; and the lack of proper capitalization was bothering me. I like to copy edit. :-p [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 03:29, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you looked at the original article as it was written, it contained some crude language. But thanks for working on the capitalization. It bothers me as well when articles are started like that.  [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 03:30, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree with you completely. I didn't want to bother with the article at the time, and I'm glad someone else did. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 03:32, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a more humorous note, [http://www.barzelay.net/files/images/other/phelps.jpg this] was taken outside of Vandy when Phelps came to visit. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 03:52, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw that picture for sale in a liberal store downtown once. It's so funny.&lt;br /&gt;
One of Phelps's lackeys told my friend that his hair was too long once. (I live about 25 miles from Topeka, so we get a lot of him.) [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 03:51, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But everyone knows, Jesus doesn't like long hair... [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 03:52, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This man makes me question the First Amendment, he is just that much of a evil being.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:54, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know. His speech is beyond reasonable and just disgusting. I would guess that a majority of Kansans would support his execution. &lt;br /&gt;
And Colin, you may be thinking of Paul :) [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 03:55, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know the feeling. I'm a huge believer in the importance of the First Amendment, especially free speech, but what he says is just so ridiculous it's hard to believe it's technically allowed. And MD, I was mostly referring to the fact that most men of Jesus' time had &amp;quot;longer&amp;quot; hair. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 04:03, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's what I thought. I don't like to judge other Christians' salvation, but I have to make an exception here for old Freddie. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 04:05, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: OK, I saw you reverted the article back after I added content about the extent of his hate speach.  There needs away for this to be stated, especially if you are going to allow the b.s. about militant homosexuals on the page.  Otherwise this article makes him come across as less insane than he is.--[[User:Jack|Jack]] 18:04, 18 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree. I just don't think that the word &amp;quot;fag&amp;quot; is appropriate for an article on this site. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 20:05, 18 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: The hate crimes against Fred Phelps section is uncited b.s. and I think it should be deleted unless someone can give any evidence beyond Phelps' own paranoia and delusional rantings.  I'm doing you a favor--Fred Phelps is not your friend. --[[User:Jack|Jack]] 11:02, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I'm also taking out the Al Gore contributions part since that isn't cited either. --[[User:Jack|Jack]] 11:04, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal Edits by Jack ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
please push your liberal views in an article about yourself.  This article is about Fred Phelps views, not yours. [[User:RightWolf2|RightWolf2]] 13:01, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Ummmm, liberal views? You say that as if it was a bad thing.  One of the commandments here is that claims need to be properly sourced.  This article is certainly making a lot of excuses regarding one of the most abhorrant men in America today.  He goes to military funerals with signs that say &amp;quot;God Hates F*gs&amp;quot;.  That is an objective, well documented fact.  However, the sysops delete it from the main page.  However, completely unsubstantiated claims by Phelps that HE is the victim of hate crimes is allowed to be left up.  --[[User:Jack|Jack]] 22:05, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The subject of an article and their public statements are reliable sources for an article.   Phelps is preaching the literal statements of the Bible.  In fact, he is at the most extreme end of the spectrum with the limits of free speech I have ever seen.   The article is about his views and him.   And he is certainly notable. [[User:RightWolf2|RightWolf2]] 22:16, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::RightWolf2, please stop editing the article to claim that Phelps is &amp;quot;literally following the Bible&amp;quot;, and please stop attacking Jack.  [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 02:36, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::1.  Not an attack, but a statement of my views.  2. When admins and their buddies start forming cabals to reinforce each other, free editing goes out the window.  3.  I am over 60 years old, I am a competent attorney, and I am not here to rain on anyones parade.  Just to add God's word.  4.  Your views of Phelps are &amp;quot;your views&amp;quot;.  Articles about subjects as controversial as phelps should enshrine &amp;quot;his views&amp;quot;, not everyone elses opinions. [[User:RightWolf2|RightWolf2]] 11:44, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Landover Baptist==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is Fred Phelps' church the inspiration for the Landover Baptist Church website that mocks Christian Extremism?--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 15:57, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:53, 22 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Phelps, although outspoken and outlandish, is far less of a hypocrite than other Christian organizations who claim to be able to determine which verses from the Bible are literal from those that are allegorical.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wow. QED. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 02:19, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With all respect to the fact that it shouldn't be stated on an encyclopedia, Phelps probably is going to Hell. -'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#007FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ames&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 00:42, 31 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Phelps is PRO-FAMILY, not anti-homosexual==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's a reason Dr. Dobson called his institution &amp;quot;Focus on the Family&amp;quot; and not &amp;quot;We Hate Gays&amp;quot;.  There's a reason that it's called the &amp;quot;Family Research Council&amp;quot;.  The people who oppose the homosexual agenda are PRO-FAMILY, not anti-anything.  Even the mainstream media generally recognizes this fact and ignore the moonbats (just like they ignore the moonbats when the moonbats try to label &amp;quot;PRO-lifers&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;ANTI-choicers&amp;quot;).  Even the mainstream media (which has been proven to be overwhelmingly liberal, remember) doesn't call Dr. Dobson a bigot or a homophobe.  So why shouldn't Conservapedia, which was created to espouse the CONSERVATIVE point of view, reflect what even liberals acknowledge?--[[User:Ashens|Ashens]] 02:38, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps isn't a true conservative. He says Bush is going to burn in hell. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 02:39, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Jeeze, conservatives aren't brainless clones who can't disagree!  I strongly disagree with Phelps on this matter, but that doesn't make him a non-conservative!  Besides, the issue isn't whether or not he's conservative, the issue is his PRO-FAMILY &amp;quot;bias&amp;quot;!--[[User:Ashens|Ashens]] 02:46, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*My reading of scripture, perhaps not as advanced as some, tells me if we keep judging, which God has said is his alone to do, we will all be burning. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:37, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with Terry, but as I've learned from much debating with christians, the argument doesn't work. They've chosen to ignore one thing the bible says in order to use another thing the bible says to achieve their goals or to justify their hate.[[User:Nsmyth|NSmyth]] 04:47, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Well, really, in the Grand Scheme of things, it isn't important.  All of us, eventually, will face the harshest, yet most loving Judge in the Universe.  Justifications, and legal arguments won't be allowed, lol. ;-) --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:50, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You can be anti homosexual without being pro-family. The cult Phelps has developed targets and belittles families, he is truely a Bad person in every sense of the word, if he has gotten anything right it has been by way of accident [[User:Opcn|Opcn]] 01:44, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being anti-homosexual is not being pro-family.  It is being pro-YOUR-idea-of-family, and forcing that idea on the rest of the world.  There's a big difference.-'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#007FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ames&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:47, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps is not pro-family, he's pro-hate. There's a difference. His websites are not family-friendly, his sermons are not, nor are his &amp;quot;hymns&amp;quot;, and neither are his images. --[[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:54, 7 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What does Phelps stand for, _besides_ hating gays?  That seems to be his one schtick. And by all accounts, he psychologically and physically abused his OWN family, which doesn't sound too 'pro-family' to me.  [http://blank.org/addict/] (Court evidence--not for the weak of stomach.)  --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 07:56, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If what you say is true, then &amp;quot;pro-family&amp;quot; must oppose homosexuals becasue they asume that homosexuals are &amp;quot;anti-family&amp;quot;. That is not true, it's not the desire of homosexual people to wreck family, they just want personal freedom to have the kind of living arangement they choose. The only reason they have gathered together is because it's their common cause to get that freedom for themselves. I'm pretty certain that if they had those rights, they would leave everyone else alone. &lt;br /&gt;
Homosexuals don't suggest that everyone should be homosexual, that would be stupid, they just want the right to live their lives as they want to, not bothering anyone, and not being bothered by anyone. If God (if he exists) dislikes it it's solely up to him to judge, none of us are entitled to do that. --[[User:Atkins|Atkins]] 23:45, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems that whoever said that in the first place was being a parodist. We definitely don't stand for Phelps's hate here in Kansas, or here at Conservapedia. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:50, 24 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What the #$@% ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page mention nothing about the sick twisted and evil nature of Fred Phelps and his family cult. I don't know how this site can call itself conservative and not utterly denounce someone who celebrates the deaths of our fighting men and women and taunts the families of our brave departed soldiers. I am disgusted that he gets off with one line of criticism. [[User:Opcn|Opcn]] 01:41, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Opcn, I believe the principle at work here is &amp;quot;The Enemy Of My Enemy Is My Friend.&amp;quot;  Which is a very long way from &amp;quot;Love thine enemies&amp;quot; but that was just some liberal claptrap from about 33 AD or so.  [[User:Teresita|Banned User Teresita]] 01:50, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps and Religion == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It's hard to be religious when certain people aren't incinerated by bolts of lightning.&amp;quot; -- Calvin.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 07:46, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== disgusting liberal bias  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
this article is terribly condemning of this man. this is the same kind of p.c. bias crap that made me sick of wikipedia. mr. phelps believes in the same things we all do, so why is this article against hihm? he only believes in the things that jesus taught1!1[[User:Manifestdestiny|Manifestdestiny]] 18:42, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Wrong.  At no time did Jesus ever condemn a soldier, unlike this man.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 18:49, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::but jesus did condemn homosexuals. [[User:Cryingeagles39|Cryingeagles39]] 12:51, 5 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Jesus told everyone in plain terms that if they continued to sin, they would not inherit the Kingdom of Heaven.  His message in the Gospels was that everyone should repent.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:06, 5 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Exactly. Jesus never specifically mentioned homosexuality in the gospels, but he did do what Karajou mentioned, which would encompass all types of sin, including homosexuality.  [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:20, 5 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I do know Jesus commanded that we not judge, or we would be.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:12, 25 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== God Hates Canada ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Didn't Phelps also light a flag on fire in the middle of an airport, thus causing his arrest? [[User:Kazumaru|Kazumaru]] 18:44, 13 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I haven't heard about this! Do you have a link? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:44, 13 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.holysmoke.org/hs02/phelps3.htm] is the best I can find. I was wrong, I guess. Seems he didn't actually get around to torching the flag. [[User:Kazumaru|Kazumaru]] 19:03, 13 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nevermind... &amp;quot;When WBC members did in fact actually burn the Canadian flag in religious protest to Canada's approval of same-sex marriage, the so-called Christians of Canada were the loudest in denouncing WBC and &amp;quot;widely reviling&amp;quot; her Gospel message.&amp;quot; That's from his God Hates Canada page. Appears I was mistaken about the airport thing, though. [[User:Kazumaru|Kazumaru]] 19:09, 13 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps And The Democratic Party ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone please get rid of this header at the bottom of the page? Seems a bit of a stretch to me. --[[User:Ouzo|Ouzo]] 14:35, 11 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think we've addressed your concerns. [http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={91058469-F6DE-4615-8B2A-73CDF3E8FCAC} The &amp;quot;God Hates Fags&amp;quot; Left].  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:06, 11 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Activist!???==&lt;br /&gt;
Last time I checked liberals support gay people and are secular. Calling Fred Phelps a liberal would be akin to calling Osama bin Laden a pacifist. Someone should change this --[[User:AllahuAkbarJihad|AllahuAkbarJihad]] 21:50, 12 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps is not a leftist, he is on the extreme fringes of the religious right, he's an embarrasment to conservatives so he is called a &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;. I can't believe how biased this website is --[[User:AllahuAkbarJihad|AllahuAkbarJihad]] 21:53, 12 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps celebrated the 9/11 attacks and the more recent al-Qaeda strikes in London as the just recompense of Western decadence. He supported Saddam Hussein and has been appreciative to Fidel Castro. Phelps is probably more appropriately described in psychiatric than political terms. '''But his political roots are in the Democratic Party, having run for office in Kansas five times, and actively supported Al Gore in 1988 and 1992, whose campaign used Phelps’ family office space. Son Fred Phelps Jr., who had hosted a fund raiser for Gore, attended the 1993 Clinton-Gore inaugural.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More careful media coverage acknowledges that Phelps’ ostensibly Baptist church is &amp;quot;unaffiliated&amp;quot; and comprised of only his family members, whose compound of houses is assembled around the church and its swimming pool used for baptisms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps, now age 76, has demonstrated outside the Bush Ranch in Crawford, Texas. He has demonstrated against conservative religious activists James Dobson, Jerry Falwell, and Pat Robertson. He has demonstrated against the Southern Baptist Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:41, 13 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if Phelps did support the Democrats at one time, that doesn't make him a liberal. Guiliani is a Republican and he is certainly not a Conservative (pro gay marriage, pro abortion). I'd argue that Phelps is delusional rather than liberal or conservative but I think it is terribly biased and incorrect to state that he is a leftist and a liberal. Liberals tend to be secular and pro gay marriage, Phelps does not embrace liberal values --[[User:Fredphelpsisamoron|Fredphelpsisamoron]] 16:17, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would argue that Phelps is actually a conservative. He is against gay marriage and is very religious, these are two traits of conservatives. --[[User:MichaelM|MichaelM]] 16:44, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I don't buy it sounds more like an anti liberal rant, and is the sort of statement which will atract vandals to this site. Liberals didn't support Saddam, I mean some might of, they just didn't support the war in Iraq, ! [[User:Tubesock|Tubesock]] 17:35, 19 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There is more to conservatism than ONE ISSUE. Economics, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, there are religious liberals out there. Ever heard of Jimmy Carter? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:45, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
True, but Jimmy Carter is only moderatly oppposed to homosexuality and believes in evolution, he is not the same hate filled bigot that Phelps is. Maybe Phelps isn't conservative, but he certainly isn't liberal either. I think saying Phelps is a leftist is POV pushing. It should be taken out. --[[User:MichaelM|MichaelM]] 16:47, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, wait, wait. What does evolution have to do with it? We've had a lot of liberals tell us that we should not be politicizing science. I actually agree with that. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:51, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps doesn't believe in evolution and he believes in creationism. Creationism, particularly YEC is associated with conservatism. I agree that science shouldn't be politicized but creationists, especially YEC, tend to be conservative while evolutionists tend to be moderate or liberal. --[[User:MichaelM|MichaelM]] 16:53, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::OK. So we have evidence liberals may be open minded and tolerant of other views.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:14, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::*There is no such thing, outside of perhaps Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi as 100% Liberals. Guiliani, I might chime in, isn't taking a &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; stance on some issues, but a old line conservative POV, pre-neoconservative, more Libertarian stance. Many of Phelps' idealogical pronouncements most certainly do fit more within the secular-progressive tent than the conservative one.  And one must note there wasn't any repudiation on the part of Citizen Gore when he was happily taking Phelps &amp;amp; Company money and office space, was there? End of argument there.  Point is, Phelps is almost certainly a Demon from Hell. He certainly isn't worthy of anyone's defense, or the attention he is getting.  --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:47, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think any of Phelps stances fit liberalism at all. The use of liberal and leftist is misleading and biased --[[User:JimmyR|JimmyR]] 20:29, 14 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just because he opposes Bush and conservatives doesn't mean that he isn't one of them. Conservatives, like Liberals can have disagreements among one another and are not one monolithic block. Besides Ronald Reagan supported Saddam in the 80s, does that make him a liberal? I think you should take out &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;liberal activist&amp;quot; it is terribly biased and misleading and just makes Conservapedia look bad --[[User:BillCasey|BillCasey]] 10:19, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree.  Phelps is no more a liberal activist than the KKK is a conservative action group. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 11:54, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Exactly, Phelps has been criticized across the political spectrum from leftist gay rights groups to conservative Christians, he is neither liberal or conservative, he is just plain nuts --[[User:BillCasey|BillCasey]] 17:55, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:ok, we know the 'ol &amp;quot;he's a bad guy so he must be a religious conservative&amp;quot; argument is the basis of many Wikipedia articles, and thousands of other websites.  But this is CP, we're basically (1) concerned with facts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, Phelps, a creationist, is an example of a broadminded [[leftist]].  What's wrong with that?  Although some of his views are extraordinarily repugnant, Al &amp;amp; Tipper, in keeping with thier one time advocacy of censoring [[music]] content and being pro-[[big tabacco]], once courted a constituency there.  Gore only dropped these views when the Clintons put him on the ticket.  Perhaps the [[Nobel Prize]] Committee made the award to the wrong guy.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:15, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Al Gore is not really a leftist. More a flip-flop, his views swing from liberal to conservative depending on how the political wind blows. Besides supporting Gore doesn't automatically make Phelps a liberal. I'm not saying you should say he is a conservative. But liberals/conservatives calling those who are repugnant to both groups the group they disagree with is wrong and biased. Both liberals and conservatives oppose Phelps so he should be called neither. --[[User:BillCasey|BillCasey]] 18:22, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:hmmm, so Phelps is [[mainstream]] or [[centrist]]?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:28, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, he's just an extremist. Like the KKK. --[[User:BillCasey|BillCasey]] 18:34, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Very interesting; on [[political spectrum theory]] I once postulated that the theory was useless, and meaningless.  Perhaps Phelps is an example.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 19:00, 16 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If that is the case then I think the word leftist should be taken out, it is misleading and besides Phelps is usually considered part of the Religious Right, whether that is true or not --[[User:DanielJamesRideout|DanielJamesRideout]] 12:26, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, because the so-called &amp;quot;Religious Right&amp;quot; is unfairly defamed, we should pile on in support of liberal fascist objectives.  ''Wiederlich.''   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:48, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conservatives call him liberal and the liberals call him conservative. He is clearly insane. Liberalism and insanity often go together but here insanity crowds everything else out. [[User:SkipJohnson|SkipJohnson]] 12:54, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism and insanity go together, thats a pretty harsh insult for people who you merely have a political disagreement with? Why so much hate? --[[User:NathanRodgers|NathanRodgers]] 12:57, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If it was not for the '''fact''' of Phelps [[political]] [[activism]], in support of [[political]] candidates, or the [[fact]] Phelps ran for [[political]] office on the ticket of a major [[political party]], we would not be having this discusssion.  But given the [[political]] realities, we can only use Phelps own stated [[political]] affilliations.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:48, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes it is true that Phelps was associated with the Democrats but remember that at one time the Democrats were the &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; party. The Democrats are now supportive or at least tolerant of homosexuals and Phelps has referred to his former friend Al Gore as a &amp;quot;Fag-enabler&amp;quot;. There aren't too many differences between Republicans and Democrats anyways. I think that leftist and liberal activist should be taken out, other than that the article is fine. --[[User:NathanRodgers|NathanRodgers]] 14:48, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You say &amp;quot;was associated.&amp;quot;  We have no basis for that.  It was Al Gore who shifted, not Phelps.  And we have no reason to believe Gore publicly shifted other than [[career opportunism]], not any personal, inner, [[moral]] change in his fundamental beliefs.  Further, we have ample evidence Gore has both consistently, and persistently, been less then ingenuous in his own personal, inner convictions since pursuing a path of personal career opportunism. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:42, 18 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think anyone with a natural mind can see that Phelps openly supports an agenda that is complicated. However, as Rob eloquently sated above, he ran as a [[Democrat]]. This fact is undeniable. Now, if anyone else wants to take issue with that, that's fine, but I would advise that this is a waste of everyone's time and ought to be a bannable offense. The &amp;quot;but but but&amp;quot; crowd needs to grow up and acept that this guy is one of their own. [[User:Mathers|ItMathers]] 17:56, 19 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Lj105.jpg|thumb|250px|right|According to liberal authors, Fred Phelps &amp;quot;self-identifies as a Democrat.&amp;quot; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm not sure it's quite as simple as that, Mathers. As I understand it, membership of either the Republican or Democrat Party in the States requires no specific ideology and often is simply a matter of publically stating your preference. As Stephen Colbert demonstrated recently, it's even possible to be a member of both! It's a bit of a stretch then to say that Democrats en masse (or liberals, for that matter) consider him 'one of their own'. It might be more accurate to say that Phelps &amp;quot;self-identifies as a Democrat&amp;quot;, and elsewhere in the article that &amp;quot;Phelps has been criticized by conservatives and liberals alike&amp;quot;. Is there any way we can modify the page to reflect this? [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 23:23, 7 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Very funny. Seriously though guys, could an admin modify the text? I imagine it'd save a lot of bickering on this Talk page. [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 23:23, 11 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Very well said, Mathers!  --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:33, 19 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:*I don't understand why libs have trouble with the idea that libs hate; seems to be an everyday occurance.  I've experienced it daily for 40 years.  Look at Ann Coulter.  Libs cannot restrain spewing their hatred toward her.  Or Rush. Or O'Reilly, Falwell, Bush, the list is endless.  Why is it such a shock to libs that liberals spew hate?   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 23:39, 11 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Democrat (or at least ex-Democrat), sure. But liberal?==&lt;br /&gt;
Describing Phelps as a Democrat is justifiable, since he did run as a Democrat, but the first sentence dexcribes him as a &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot;, which I believe is the same as &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;. This seems flawed. Not all Democrats are liberal and vice versa (anyone remember Zell Miller? Reagan and Thurmond were both Democrats once too). Looking at Conservapedia's own definition of [[liberal]] we have the following specific views how many of them apply to Phelps?&lt;br /&gt;
#denial of inherent gender differences, leading to things such as allowing men and women to have the same jobs in the military (while quietly holding them to different standards)&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence that he feels this way&lt;br /&gt;
#taxpayer-funded abortion&lt;br /&gt;
#:Certainly not&lt;br /&gt;
#same-sex marriage&lt;br /&gt;
#:HA!&lt;br /&gt;
#support of affirmative action&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence of this&lt;br /&gt;
#support of political correctness&lt;br /&gt;
#:Not at all&lt;br /&gt;
#censorship of prayer in classrooms&lt;br /&gt;
#:No&lt;br /&gt;
#compelled taxpayer funding of government schools for nearly all ages&lt;br /&gt;
#:Hard to say, but publicly funded schools are hardly a liberal issue; there is widespread support for them. Most people do not want to completely privatize education.&lt;br /&gt;
#government-controlled medical care&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence of this&lt;br /&gt;
#labor unions&lt;br /&gt;
#:no evidence of this&lt;br /&gt;
#elimination of abstinence-only program funding&lt;br /&gt;
#:Given his religious views, this seems unlikely&lt;br /&gt;
#income redistribution, usually through progressive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence of this&lt;br /&gt;
#a &amp;quot;living Constitution&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted rather than an unchanging Constitution as written&lt;br /&gt;
#:No idea. He'd probably support a &amp;quot;living constitution&amp;quot; if interpretations of the document would harm the homosexual agenda, but against it if it would promote it. &lt;br /&gt;
#support for gun control&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidnce for this (seems unlikely)&lt;br /&gt;
#government programs to rehabilitate criminals&lt;br /&gt;
#:No idea&lt;br /&gt;
#environmentalism&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence for this&lt;br /&gt;
#disarmament treaties&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence (this guy seems not to be much of a foreign policy wonk, except when it comes to praising anti-gay foreign leaders)&lt;br /&gt;
#globalism&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence of this (except for global condemnation of homosexuality)&lt;br /&gt;
#opposition to a strong American foreign policy&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence&lt;br /&gt;
#support of obscenity and pornography as a First Amendment right&lt;br /&gt;
#:Seems unlikely&lt;br /&gt;
#opposition to full private property rights&lt;br /&gt;
#:No evidence of this&lt;br /&gt;
#limit conservative talk radio by reinstating the Fairness Doctrine&lt;br /&gt;
#:Seems unlikely that he'd want to do anything to aid the pro-gay liberal media&lt;br /&gt;
So he basically has no discernable liberal traits. This does not make him a conservative, but it really seems he's not a leftist. The only things that point to his leftism are running as a Democrat (who can say why he picked one party over the other? He didn't have much suport from either, it seems) and his support for Gore (dropped when it turned out Gore's views on homosexuality were more liberal than the previously appered). Since Democrat is not the same as liberal, I'm not sure how the latter applies to him. Can anyone justify the inclusion of the term leftist? If someone can point out statements he's made supporting strong environmentalism, opposition to gun rights, disarmament treaties, property rights opposition, or such a case could certainly be made, but right now I'm not seeing any real leftism here. [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 10:51, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; portion is cited.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:14, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry, but I don't see it. I see citations for the Democrat part, which isn't the issue. Can point out the specific citation to me? [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 14:47, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={91058469-F6DE-4615-8B2A-73CDF3E8FCAC}] Perhaps we need [[CP:Common knowledge]].  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:12, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sorry, but that doesn't clear anything up. Nowhere does that piece call Phelps &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; (even if it did, it would be the opinion of a journalist). We've established his conection to the Democratic Party, but where's his liberalism?  This site has 21 examples of liberal traits, which does he meet? His anti-gay agenda shapes his opinions on all other matters. If supporting Castro makes him a liberal, what about condemning Sweden (The most socialist state in Europe)? I think everyone can agree that hating gays is not a  trait that makes one liberal, and that is about the only trait he has. I think the guy defies all aspects of the traditional left/right spectrum, and I don't see the point of trying to pigeonhole him into one group. By all means this article should disassociate him from the Christian wing of the conservative movement, but that doesn't by definition make him liberal. Is there a source that shows how he meets even ''one'' of the 21 examples bove (and he'd need to meet more than one to be classified as a liberal)? [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 15:42, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::So, were back to the definition &amp;quot;a liberal is a leftist,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a leftist is a liberal.&amp;quot;  We were attacked by cyberterrorists for months trying to put that stuff in.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Liberals don't hate?  Please....And nowhere in the text does it say Phelps is a liberal.  He is in Cat:Liberal activists, and a strong case can be made that he belongs there.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:07, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I know nothing about cyberterrorists and such, but I was sort of under the impression that liberal and leftist were sort of interchangable. This site's own article says that leftist is associated with &amp;quot;social democracy, liberalism, or the several strains of socialism and communism. It may also be applied to those who oppose conservative politics. The word 'liberal' is often used in the US to mean 'leftist'. But this is inconsistent with the original meaning of the word liberal.&amp;quot; I see nothing socialist or communist about Phelps (support for Castro is based solely on his anti-gay stance, not his economics), nor any real connection with social democracy. In this country it ''is'' basically interchangable with &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; (classical liberalism is out of the scope of this issue), so calling him a leftist is much the same as calling him a liberal. And note that I never said liberals don't hate, I said that hating gays is not a liberal trait. Are you trying to argue that it is? I think that would be an uphill battle, but feel free to try. And by the way, calling him a liberal activist ''is'' calling him a liberal (just like saying someone is a Mexican footballer is saying he is Mexican, and a footballer). So if he isn't a liberal but is a leftist, what is it that makes him a leftist (and how is that different from the standard definition of liberal that the 21 points illustrate)? [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 16:28, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::&amp;quot;calling him a leftist is much the same as calling him a liberal,&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Where in the text does it say this?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:37, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Okay, if the two are not synonymous (or nearly so), then explain the difference. I think I'm not alone in thinking the two terms are so close as to be basically interchangable. The [[leftist]] article here is pretty unclear on just about all aspects of the term, and does not draw any real distinctions between liberal and leftist. The article even states &amp;quot;The word 'liberal' is often used in the US to mean 'leftist'&amp;quot;, and since this is an American encyclopedia, aimed at the layman, it seems that if you're going to use the term in different way than it is often used you should make that distinctly clear. If the article means to say he is a leftist but not a liberal then the difference between the two should be explicitly stated, and how he fits into the category &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; should also be made clear. Furthermore, if he isn't a liberal he should be removed from the liberal activists category, and his entry should be removed from the [[liberal hate speech]] article. [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 00:40, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::*''I think I'm not alone in thinking the two terms are so close as to be basically interchangable.''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::*Congratulations, and ''good for you.''  Unfortuneatly, like the [[theory of evolution]], you can not impose your [[moral]]ity on me, and ''force'' me to accept the [[political spectrum theory]].  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:47, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[unindenting] Well, this very site says the two terms are often used interchangably, and I have no idea what evolution and imposition of morality have to do with anything, so we'll let that bit rest. So I'll ask the questions I'd like to see addressed, and I'll number them to make it easy:&lt;br /&gt;
:1. What is the difference between a leftist and a liberal, as used in this case?&lt;br /&gt;
:2. How is Phelps a leftist? What specific opinions does he hold that make him such?&lt;br /&gt;
:3. If he is not a liberal, why is he in the liberal activist category, and used as an example of liberal hate speech?&lt;br /&gt;
I'll wait for a reply. [[User:BillyFranco|BillyFranco]] 00:57, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Here it is, Troll:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * BillyFranco (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 04:57, 23 October 2007) (Earliest: 14:51, 22 October 2007) [6]&lt;br /&gt;
    * Briantrust (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 20:35, 20 October 2007) (Earliest: 15:54, 19 October 2007) [3]&lt;br /&gt;
    * AuH2O (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 16:34, 20 October 2007) (Earliest: 14:59, 20 October 2007) [3]&lt;br /&gt;
 IP: 24.29.72.31 Schenectady, NY,United States&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Here is yet another shining example of liberal [[deceit]].  They cannot even argue honestly.  They need socks to hide their dishonesty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Godspeed to you! --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:47, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;RobS high fives TK&amp;gt;; By thier fruits ye shall know them.  Defenders &amp;amp; apologists is usually a dead give away.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:24, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Activist? (Edit Break)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I despise Liberals but I have to agree with this loonie leftie this time, Phelps is definetly not a liberal even though he was (or possibly still is) a member of the Democratic Party. Besides what's wrong with protesting homosexuality anyways? I just think he carries it too far thats all --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 16:22, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ahaha, typical liberal behaviour lol. Still though, I don't think Phelps is a liberal. He certainly isn't conservative either but calling him a liberal when he clearly isn't just makes Conservapedia look bad.--[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 17:59, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did you at all read the material RobS provided?  --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:13, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not yet, I'll take a look at it and make my decision on Phelps' political views then --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 18:25, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've taken a look at some of the things Rob has said, Phelps is or was a democrat but he is liberal only in name. His views are not liberal at all. I don't care what he says about homosexuality, it is a sin after all, Phelps just goes a little too nutty over it. My issue with him is the disrespect of American soldiers and his criticism of Bush. Bush is in no way a &amp;quot;fag-enabler&amp;quot; and is quite critical of homosexuality. Phelps is not firing on all cylinders though, thats for sure. --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 18:40, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Konserva... the guy above me, Phelps doesn't really qualify as a leftist/liberal. I mean, if he joined the Republican party, would we even be discussing this? There are probably quite a few rogues if we look hard enough into each party's details. maybe Charles Manson believed in a weak federal government and strong gun ownership rights. Does that alone make him a Conservative? At the end of the day, I think the blush is off his liberal democrat rose. [[User:Mathers|ItMathers]] 18:49, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is pretty easy, as RobS says, to get people to reveal themselves! --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:23, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, I will say I'm happy he's on their side. ;) [[User:Mathers|ItMathers]] 19:36, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::We should probably give credit to the watchdog organizations that single out and trash Phleps, it gives them credibility and balance, shows they are capable of broadminded thinking, and not mindless partisan trolls.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 23:54, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If these watchdog groups are liberal, they will likely just throw Phelps in with conservatives. While I don't think Phelps is a liberal, his anti-war activities and support of Castro make him exempt from being classified as a conservative. I don't think Phelps falls neatly into either category and both liberals and conservatives are accusing him of being in the other camp because nobody wants him --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 00:05, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*''If these watchdog groups are liberal, they will likely just throw Phelps in with conservatives.''&lt;br /&gt;
:*They've obviously done that.  This is why CP exists, this is closely related to one of our core missions, to counter these slanders of conservatives &amp;amp; conservative views by leftist ideological slander factories.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:09, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree, the media has a terrible liberal bias along with these watchdog groups. Phelps is delusional, he is neither liberal or conservative. I still think we should leave political labels out of the description (other than his support for Al Gore which is documented fact), it will just make Conservapedia look bad and give those whiney liberals something else to complain about --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 00:12, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Where does the media get thier impressions and opinion about Phelps?  From these watchdog organizations -- you never would have heard of Phelps otherwise.  Then the media &amp;amp; watchdog organizations also are actively engaged in an agenda, pushing [[gay rights]] and the [[homosexual agenda]], for example.  Where does the opposition to this agenda come from? Church people.  Who is Phelps &amp;amp; what is his organization? He's a preacher &amp;amp; preaches at a church.  ''Voila!''  We have more right-wing, neofascist, hate-mongering Christain Coalition homophobic bigots that need to be exterminated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, his views are Democrat, on the left, and quite in the tradition of stupid, pointless, [[liberal activism]] designed for no other reason than to get people angry, and draw publicity.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:22, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just because someone is democrat doesn't mean that they are liberal. Bob Novak was a democrat --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 18:31, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Bob Novak is and was pretty liberal on many things, so a poor example. ;-) -- --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:45, 24 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bob Novak liberal? I don't find him that liberal. He is pro-Iraq war and anti-socialized-medicine. Perhaps he is not as conservative as most Republicans but he is certainly more conservative than the vast majority of democrats and some Republicans too. Also Al and Tipper Gore weren't always as liberal as they claim they are today. They were both in favour of censoring violent and explicit lyrics of rappers and Al Gore was anti-homosexual at one point. They only distanced themselves from Phelps when it became politically expedient. They didn't mind his money though. Still the point is as much as a nut as Phelps is, he isn't really a liberal and it is misleading to label him that. He is opposed to the homosexual agenda, is antiabortion, antievolution, and is religious. While he may share the anti-war sentiment of the left, his reasons for doing so are completely different. I think it is misleading to label him a leftist and we don't want to be guilty of bias like Wikipedia is --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 13:42, 25 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Maybe I need to teach a class or something, helping liberals do parody of conservatives. :S --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:42, 25 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You think Phelps is actually a liberal pretending to hate homosexuals to make conservatives look bad? I don't think he's intelligent enough to think of such a scheme. Liberals are usually pretty stupid. --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 16:25, 25 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Phelps is a Demon, not a Human. Important difference. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:45, 25 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Fred Phelps is NOT left-wing==&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Fred Phelps a closet liberal&amp;quot; source is merely a discussion in relation to an article, it is not a valid source and should be removed. The left support gays and anti-homosexuality adovocates clearly belong on the right whether they are democrat or republican. --[[User:ChavezFan|ChavezFan]] 16:41, 29 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Do all left-wingers [[fascism|goosestep]] to the [[gay agenda]]?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:14, 30 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::They Pretty much do, liberalism and homosexuality go hand in hand, stupid liberals. Talk about Groupthink hahahaha --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 19:45, 30 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I thought liberalism was the [[big tent]]? You mean everyone has to tow the party line, and there is no tolerance for [[diversity]]?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 20:29, 30 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Liberals are very intolerant of conservative viewpoints. While they are tolerant of nearly all religions (except Christianity) they are very intolerant of anyone who criticizes homosexuality or political correctness. Liberals are highly ideological. Trust me, I come from a country full of these pinkos --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 21:33, 30 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Does it really matter? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trying to associating Fred Phelps with the right or the left is ridiculous. Neither of them like him. The whole political spectrum wouldn't mind a meteorite taking out the Westboro Baptist Church compound (preferably with the whole congregation/family inside) It's deceptive and ridiculous to try to associate him with anyone as a means of discrediting them: Democrats hate him, Baptists hate him, Christian fundamentalists hate him, the ACLU hates him. Gays hate him, US soldiers hate him, Mary Cheney hates him, Swedes hate him, Al Gore hates him, 9/11 victims hate him. Who knows, '''maybe God Hates Fred Phelps'''. So please, have some '''common sense''' and remove the deceptive references to leftist, liberal, and the anti-war movement. - [[User:PostoStudanto|PostoStudanto]] [[User_talk:PostoStudanto| &amp;amp;#x2709;Tλlk]] 23:13, 8 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. One of the blog links is broken.&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, your [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fred_Phelps&amp;amp;diff=330569&amp;amp;oldid=330497 removal] of my remarks against Fred Phelps was totally uncalled for and not remotely related to policy. {{tl|Remove personal remark}} is for attacks on fellow editors, not going after the subject of an article. From what I've seen on Conservapedia, going after a [[Hillary Rodham Clinton|subject]] is acceptable anywhere. No personal attacks itself isn't even well enforced, for that matter. For example, you told someone to &amp;quot;get a chiropractor to help get your foot out of your mouth&amp;quot; on [[Talk:Al Gore]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Oops, forgot my sig yesterday [[User:PostoStudanto|PostoStudanto]] [[User_talk:PostoStudanto| &amp;amp;#x2709;Tλlk]] 22:41, 15 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Trying to associating Fred Phelps with the right or the left is ridiculous.''&lt;br /&gt;
Seconded - ''(the following is reposted, since it seems to have escaped the sysops' attention. Apologies.)''&lt;br /&gt;
As I understand it, membership of either the Republican or Democrat Party in the States requires no specific ideology and often is simply a matter of publically stating your preference. As Stephen Colbert demonstrated recently, it's even possible to be a member of both! It's a bit of a stretch then to say that Democrats en masse (or liberals, for that matter) consider him 'one of their own'. It might be more accurate to say that Phelps &amp;quot;self-identifies as a Democrat&amp;quot;, and elsewhere in the article that &amp;quot;Phelps has been criticized by conservatives and liberals alike&amp;quot;. Is there any way we can modify the page to reflect this? [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 23:14, 15 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Fred Phelps is a leftist anti-homosexual behavior activist and liberal Democrat&amp;quot;== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original post by [[User:ModerateCatholic|ModerateCatholic]] on the [[Talk:Main Page|Main Page Talk]]. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 18:45, 14 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Since the article is locked, and several people have appealed for it to be changed on the talk page but ignored, I thought it best to put it here in order to garner some sort of consensus. Is Fred Phelps a Liberal? Picketing funerals of soldiers killed in Iraq because their country supposedly supports the 'homosexual agenda' is markedly illiberal. It needs change. [[User:ModerateCatholic|ModerateCatholic]] 16:54, 14 December 2007 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here, also, is the ensuing discussion on the main page. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 14:57, 28 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''As a veteran, I find Fred Phelps' actions to be reprehensible and despicable.  The very freedom that allowed him and his ilk to protest in that manner was provided by the life of the soldier he's protesting.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 09:58, 15 December 2007 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''Nobody likes [[Fred Phelps]], we know that. But that doesn't mean he can be branded a [[liberal]] just for being despicable - does it? Apparently he has some history with the [[Democratic Party]], but his actual views don't seem very &amp;quot;liberal Democrat&amp;quot; to me. Perhaps he doesn't really fit into any political category? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 11:12, 15 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::''Even if he was a staunch Republican and conservative, there is absolutely no call for his actions.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 11:28, 15 December 2007 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
::''Agreed (though I hope it didn't seem that I was trying to imply he was!) [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 17:30, 15 December 2007 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
''In light of Andy's recent comments about non-linear political alignment, I would recommend that the &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; statement be redacted, and something to the effect of &amp;quot;Fred Phelps' political alignment seems to fall outside of any political category&amp;quot;. --[[User:SimonA|SimonA]] 16:07, 15 December 2007 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
''Given that advancing the homosexual agenda is a defining characteristic of Democrats and Liberals, it's hard to see how being so opposed to homosexuals would make him a Democrat or a Liberal. I looked over the article on him, and it said he did run to be the democrat nominee but didn't win. Maybe there are races where he did win the nomination, but just running doesn't mean the democrats support him. I mean, I would never call Ron Paul a republican but here he is running as one.[[User:TRipp|TRipp]] 16:28, 15 December 2007 (EST)''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Another example why any moralistic person should avoid this site like a plague. [[User:ModerateCatholic|ModerateCatholic]] 12:55, 28 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The word &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; should be removed from the first sentence ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is fine to characterize him as democrat, since this is documented, but characterizing him as a &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot; is far from documented, or universally accepted.  If there are people that feel that is the case, then it is worth a section in the article, however placing a controversial and undocumented piece of information in the first sentence, discredits the article as a whole.--[[User:PhineasBogg|PhineasBogg]] 23:21, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wholeheartedly agree, and I think there's a clear consensus on this point. I will request the page to be unlocked so that we can edit it. [[User:Walton One|Walton One]] 11:40, 18 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Phelps and the Bible ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article has a lot of condemnatory language about him from a secular standpoint, but it should also say what's wrong with him from a Biblical standpoint, citing chapter and verse. [[User:DavidE|DavidE]] 10:37, 12 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree. How about starting with 1 Corinthians 6:9-11? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:44, 18 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Am I the only one? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone else thinks Fred Phelps looks like the Reverand Kane from the Poltergiest movies?  {{unsigned|Jedisqrl}}&lt;br /&gt;
: Or does Reverend Kane look like Fred Phelps (deliberately)?  (I don't know what either looks like, so I'm offering no opinion).  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:08, 8 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::You're definitely [http://msunderestimated.com/PhelpsKane.jpg not alone]! [[User:StatsMsn|StatsMsn]] 09:48, 8 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I doubt the Poltergeist movies were influenced by Phelps, considering they well pre-date his rise to prominence. I suppose its possible, that Phelps intentionally tries to look like him, if the idea that he's actually running some sort of performance art piece and/or massive parody of Christian fundamentalism is true, but I doubt that's the case. [[User:ArthurA|ArthurA]] 13:07, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;First class nut&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have heard and seen this before, but I have been unable to find a source attributing this particular quote. Anyone care to help me out? [[User:EelisA|EelisA]] 16:46, 14 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Not liberal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He's not a liberal, if he opposes homosexuality. But I don't think of him as a conservative: more of a radical fundamentalist. He's the [[gay rights movement]]'s poster boy for [[intolerance]], a potent justification for using the label &amp;quot;[[homophobia]]&amp;quot; to describe all the opposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it would help our cause to distance ourselves from him. In particular the motto, &amp;quot;God hates fags&amp;quot; is not a conservative idea. Recall, &amp;quot;[[God hates sin but loves the sinner]]&amp;quot;. Our heavenly Father has a [[parental heart]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:00, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I would argue that Phelps is actually insane, in the clinical sense of the word. Its unfair to attempt to attach any mainstream political label to him -- people all across the political spectrum reject him. [[User:ArthurA|ArthurA]] 13:03, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::^This. To be honest, this also goes for people like Hitler; people who are so left-wing they go off the edge and appear on the right, people who are neither left nor right but up or down. There's some people you can't classify other than 'insane'. [[User:ETrundel|ETrundel]] 13:24, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Careful, now. Whenever an online discussion starts to mention Hitler, that's like touching the third rail in the subway. The power of his shocking works overwhelm us, and we stop thinking clearly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phelps is only wrong in his idea that God &amp;quot;punishes&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;hates&amp;quot; homosexuals. This is not to say that he's wrong about homosexuality being a sin. A lot of support for Communism is based on a high ethical idea that no one should monopolize the nation's wealth at the expense of the poor. They only go wrong in the way they want to solve the [[unequal distribution]] problem: i.e., &amp;quot;kill the capitalists and steal their loot!&amp;quot; [http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:JwqaZFQvOtMJ:www.cusd.chico.k12.ca.us/~bsilva/projects/russia/Radzinsky%2520Stalin.doc+bolsheviks+steal+loot&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ct=clnk&amp;amp;cd=5&amp;amp;gl=us&amp;amp;client=firefox-a] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We need to solve economic problems that Capitalism and Communism have not been able to eliminate. Ethical means, however, must be used. Likewise, we need to solve the problem of [[immorality]] (and not only [[homosexuality]: there's a lot of heterosexual sin, such as [[adultery]]); yet an attitude of hatred and hostility towards people is not likely to solve the [[free love]] problem. It could make it worse. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:40, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd say he's wrong about considerably more than just his idea that God hates homosexuals, Ed.  Remember that Phelps and his flock are virulently anti-American and celebrate the deaths of American soldiers and Americans in general.  A number of his faithful recently turned up in Buffalo to picket memorial services for those who died on Flight 3407; his daughter claimed in an interview that the plane crashed as punishment for not giving more credit to God for the Miracle on the Hudson.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 16:47, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, one cannot diagnose &amp;quot;insanity&amp;quot; without a medical degree, you know.  I never supported or endorsed Al Gore for President. I never donated any of my personal property for a Gore campaign headquarters. I wonder who is the liberal then, me, or Fred Phelps who actually is a Gore supporter?  It's not exactly rocket science, but I do see lots of liberals squirming and parsing words, and making up all kinds of caveats to somehow spin it Phelps isn't one!  --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:14, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And Ronald Reagan was once a Democrat. Prominent conservative activist David Horowitz was a gen-yoo-wine Marxist during the Sixties. Lots of people change their views throughout their lives. But I don't think he calls himself a Democrat now, and I doubt anyone in the party welcome him if he tried to become active again. You can't eternally classify someone by the views they once held. And yes, at one time, Phelps labeled himself as a Democrat, and was involved in the party. &lt;br /&gt;
::: And yes, I am not formerly qualified to diagnose Phelps as insane (and even someone who does have the qualification would have to spend time interviewing him.) However, from what I've read about Phelps, he apparently had a severe problem with amphetamines at one time (back in the days when they were &amp;quot;diet pills&amp;quot;. The children that are estranged from the family report he beat them with the handle of a mattock (very close to an axe handle, or, to put it more simply, a really thick piece of wood.) He believes that ''only'' the members of his church are saved. I think that all points to some serious mental illness. [[User:ArthurA|ArthurA]] 08:49, 27 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::He may be a liberal, an insane one who carves his own niche in the political spectrum but a liberal all the same, but I dont think he's a Gore supporter any more. He was back when he believed Gore had a more anti-homosexual agenda, but now he strongly opposes Gore, and other Democratic figureheads like the Clintons. Any chance he'd be considered a populist or totalitarian? [[User:TPerry|TPerry]] 19:42, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Populist? Not at all. He argues that only members of his church are saved, and every other human being is going to Hell. That's not populist in any way; its about as elitist as could be imagined. Totalitarian? Hard to say, considering outside of his obsessions with homosexuals and how the government should treat them, I don't think he comments much on how a government should be structured. I wouldn't be surprised to learn he'd support a form of totalitarian theocracy, though, with himself as a priest-king. [[User:ArthurA|ArthurA]] 11:09, 27 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I consider him an enemy of America, personally.  That's about all the label he requires, in my book.--[[User:Benp|Benp]] 19:57, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The problem is with terminology and definitions.  &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; are terms that encompass a whole bag of issues and views, including political, economic, and religious.  There are many people who are &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in some areas and &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; in other areas (even though, in some cases, their views may appear to be or may actually be contradictory).  Although I'd agree that someone who opposed homosexuality is likely to be a conservative, that is not the sole factor defining a conservative.  If they are mostly but not completely one way or the other, they might be called a &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; liberal or conservative.  But some, like Phelps from what I can gather, fit neatly in neither.  But this is only a problem if one believes that &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; between them cover all possibilities.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:13, 26 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:ArthurA, that great site of errors- Wikipedia, list Phelps as a Democrat. The reason that conservatives to want to label him a Democrat is the fact that 'we Christians' are appalled by his actions. It is so easy for our religious opponents to say...another fundie right-winger, when the whole mess that exists is truly non-Christian, non-conservative. Naturally, nobody likes to be associated with this guy but unfortunately, everybody is.--[[User:Jpatt|jpatt]] 13:03, 27 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: So Wikipedia lists Phelps as a Democrat, and Wikipedia's full of errors, so does that mean that he's not a Democrat?&lt;br /&gt;
:: People do change their views, and I find it hard to imagine either main American party endorsing him, but is there any evidence of him changing his Democratic allegiance?  Wikipedia's references to him being a Democrat seem to be based on him standing as one in various elections, the last of which was eleven years ago.  Yes, he could have changed his mind since then, but the claim would be a lot more convincing if the last connection with the Democrats was, say, 30 years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
:: Being appalled by his actions is not justification for labelling him in any group.  Yes, it is easy for anti-Christians to cite his as a Christian, but them being wrong on that doesn't mean that we can therefore do similar in return and group him with the Democrats simply because we don't want him grouped with us.&lt;br /&gt;
:: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 17:30, 27 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Perhaps the best solution is not to dwell on how he should be labeled, but to simply acknowledge that his position is not Christian and not worthy of notice.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 17:56, 27 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Proof that Phelps is not a liberal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said so himself on the FAQ of his website, godhatesfags.com. In the FAQ, he openly denounces Republicans, but says that liberals are even worse. [[User:AjitJ|AjitJ]] 09:20, 11 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
== Unlock this page ==&lt;br /&gt;
I think this page should be unlocked&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that so? Well, you've made an excellent argument. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 11:09, 31 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== He's not a liberal, and he has said so himself ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page should be altered to reflect that. See, &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://www.godhatesfags.com/faq.html#Right here]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; he says, in reply to a question regarding his views on the Religious Right:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
They spend more time harrassing people who are preaching the Gospel than anything else, just like the Pharisees did to Jesus. They are '''second in evil''' only to the modern day Saduccees (i.e., bleeding heart '''liberals'''). ''(my emphasis)''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why does the article even claim such a thing? It's clearly false. [[User:AlanR|AlanR]] 08:20, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Interesting point. Only the link you provide does not say what you say it says. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 09:15, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::RobSmith, are you accusing AlanR of misquoting? Because otherwise it's pure logic that someone who calls liberals more evil than conservatives would not be himself a liberal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Since this page rightly calls out liberals for trying &amp;quot;to link Phelps to the Religious Right,&amp;quot; it's hypocritical to label him a liberal when the evidence suggests otherwise. Or do you have some other evidence for this claim? [[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 10:41, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think we've shown his intolerance and close mindedness.  What more liberal traits do we have to prove?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:16, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Self-promotion, attention-grabbing, interpreting the Bible any way he wants? Check, check, check! [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 16:18, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Against the war in Iraq, hates the troops. support from the ACLU--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:21, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He is a political opportunist, at the very least, and that is a sign of liberalism.  The undisputed fact he once supported Al Gore, and that was back in the day only liberals would have considered it, brands him for what he is. I cannot believe anyone is still questioning the appellation!   I assume the user would also question labeling Nazi's as leftists, Communism as a tool for mass murder and Planned Parenthood as racist progressives and [[Eugenicists]].  You should open your mind to the truth, because it will set you free! --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:38, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:He also spreads what has been described as 'hate speech'. This is a clear liberal trait. Conservatives are only Anti-homosexual because we know that the Lord would want them to see the light. Stop trying to whitewash by claiming he is not a liberal- this is typical liberal deceit. [[User:Myrobi|Myrobi]] 17:18, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Do you really believe that?  I know conservatives who are anti-homosexual agenda, I know Christians who oppose homosexuality on Biblical grounds, but I have never met conservatives who dislike Gay people, in general. Maybe you meant conservatives are anti-homosexuality? --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:42, 28 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Everyone is missing the point. It doesn't matter what the editors consider him to be, it's how he identifies himself and how other sources identify him. I thought this was supposed to be an encyclopedia? That's what encyclopedias do, they report the facts. And the facts say that Phelps considers liberals to be evil, no external source considers Phelps to be a liberal, and the listing him as &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; here is just an attempt to remove his stigma from the conservative side. You all need to grow up and face the facts, whether or not they're on your side. [[User:HyglacQ|HyglacQ]] 11:42, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::''it's how he identifies himself and '''how other sources identify him'''''&lt;br /&gt;
::What? We're somehow subhuman [[untermensch]] and how CP defines him doesn't count?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:15, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Beating a dead horse HyglacQ, I guess you will discount all facts. 9 out of 10 crazies come from the leftside of politics.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 11:47, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Sorry TK, I meant Anti-homosexuality, as conservatives are against it on principle, but without discriminating against those who are different. After all, we aren't liberals. HyglacQ, I have reported you for spreading liberal lies, make useful edits or take your leftism elsewhere. [[User:Myrobi|Myrobi]] 11:49, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Outside links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Fred Phelps' Unhinged Video Message to the Cheneys&amp;quot; link does not work. The following link does. Please will an admin change it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8194338250744686470#&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks.[[User:Barclay|Barclay]] 15:19, 15 December 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nottingham&amp;diff=827979</id>
		<title>Nottingham</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nottingham&amp;diff=827979"/>
		<updated>2010-11-13T19:04:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Links.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Nottingham.jpg|right|thumb|300px|Nottingham Council House]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Nottingham''' is [[England]]'s eighth largest city with a population of 275,100. The Nottingham Urban Area conurbation has a population of 666,358.  With the exception of [[London]], it is the largest [[British]] city to that was signicant before the [[industrial revolution]]. It lies roughly in the centre of England. It is the traditional county town of the county of [[Nottinghamshire]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nottingham was founded by the [[Celts]], before the [[Roman]] invasion of the 1st century AD, who knew it as ''Tigguo Cobauc'', meaning 'Place of Cave Dwellings'. This name is derived from the cave houses which the local inhabitants cut into the soft sandsone rocks and cliffs in the city. An Anglo Saxon city was built around where the Church of St Mary stands, on a low cliff in the Lace Market area of the city. Part of Danish controlled East [[Mercia]] after the treaty of Wedmore, it grew in importance as a Danish ([[viking]]) stronghold during the 9th Century, and was known as Snotingaham (&amp;quot;the homestead of Snot's people&amp;quot;), possibly named after a Norse leader. After the [[Norman]] Conquest of England in 1066, [[William the Conqueror]] had an imposing fortress, Nottingham Castle, built on top of a neighbouring cliff top and for a while, an English town and a [[French]] town grew. It is during this period of history that the legends of [[Robin Hood]] are set, focusing on the repression of the Anglo-Danish inhabitants of the Old City by the Norman nobility in the new French City. Nottingham Castle became one of Englands most important Royal fortresses, but was largely destroyed after the [[English Civil War]], by supporters of the [[Parliament]]. A new castle was constructed on the site in the 18th Century by the Duke of Portland, which was destroyed by [[Luddite]] rioters. The remains of this building now house the Nottingham City art gallery. &lt;br /&gt;
Nottingham grew rapidly during the industrial revolution and became one of the worlds most important [[lace]] manufacturing centres. Other important industries included [[coal]] [[mining]], and the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals and bicycles. Nottingham was bombed during the second world war, though many of its historic quarters have survived intact, the focus of air raids having been the industrial areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Modern Nottingham==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nottingham today is a thriving commercial centre and is the largest conurbation in the East Midlands Region. It is regarded as one of the top shopping destinations in the UK. It is well served by public transport to London (rail journeys take around two hours). East Midlands Airport is a minor international airport which serves mainly European destinations. &lt;br /&gt;
Major industries include pharmaceuticals and service industries. Nottingham is home to the UK Inland Revenue, international organisations such as Boots, Experian and Games Workshop, and the European Headquarters of several US and East Asian Corporations, such as Capital One. &lt;br /&gt;
Nottingham boasts two [[University|universities]], the British National Watersports Centre, and the British National Ice Arena, as well as several theatres, concert halls and conference centres, and the worlds oldest public house, [[Ye Olde Trip to Jerusalem.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Nottingham has a [[Catholic]] Cathedral. The Anglican ([[Church of England]]) Cathedral for [[Nottinghamshire]] lies in the nearby town of [[Southwell]]. The Ancestral Home of Lord [[Byron]], [[Newstead Abbey]] lies nearby.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Cities and Towns]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Marijuana&amp;diff=816211</id>
		<title>Marijuana</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Marijuana&amp;diff=816211"/>
		<updated>2010-09-01T20:47:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Marijuana.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Indoor Marijuana Grow (DEA photo)]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Marijuana''' is a drug that comes from the ''Cannabis'' [[plant]]. The main active ingredient in marijuana is [[Tetrahydrocannabinol|THC]], or tetrahydrocannabinol, an [[organic chemistry|organic chemical]] compound.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of marijuana can include short-term memory loss, mild [[hallucination]]s, and an impairment of physical and mental functioning. Proponents of marijuana have claimed that it has medicinal benefits (see [[Medical marijuana]]) although other treatments can also deliver these benefits to various ailments without hallucinations and the impairments to judgment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A religious or sacramental use of marijuana is reported in various cultures such as those of the [[Rastafari]] movement or the [[Sadhu]]s of India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Law==&lt;br /&gt;
Marijuana is a [[Schedule I]] [[Controlled Substance]] in the United States of America, meaning that it is an illegal substance under the law of the United States.  In a few countries, particularly in Western Europe, the substance is legal, but in other countries it is subject to much harsher criminal penalties than in the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some have advocated for decriminalization. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leap.cc Law Enforcement Against Prohibition]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Many people of varying political alignment advocate its legalization. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lp.org/issues/lp-oss.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many [[American]] [[conservative]]s, especially social conservatives, oppose legalization of marijuana in any form due to its harmful medical and emotional effects and its likelihood of harm to third parties due to drug-related crime and reckless driving. A few libertarian-leaning conservatives, most notably [[William F. Buckley]] and [[Larry Elder]], have advocated the decriminalization of this drug. Some [[liberal]]s support legalization, but most instead advocate for drug treatment and rehabilitation. [[Libertarian]]s are usually the biggest supporters of marijuana legalization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Illegal substances]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Illegal Drugs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Marijuana&amp;diff=816210</id>
		<title>Marijuana</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Marijuana&amp;diff=816210"/>
		<updated>2010-09-01T20:46:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Link + correct typo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Marijuana.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Indoor Marijuana Grow (DEA photo)]]&lt;br /&gt;
''Marijuana''' is a drug that comes from the ''Cannabis'' [[plant]]. The main active ingredient in marijuana is [[Tetrahydrocannabinol|THC]], or tetrahydrocannabinol, an [[organic chemistry|organic chemical]] compound.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of marijuana can include short-term memory loss, mild [[hallucination]]s, and an impairment of physical and mental functioning. Proponents of marijuana have claimed that it has medicinal benefits (see [[Medical marijuana]]) although other treatments can also deliver these benefits to various ailments without hallucinations and the impairments to judgment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A religious or sacramental use of marijuana is reported in various cultures such as those of the [[Rastafari]] movement or the [[Sadhu]]s of India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Law==&lt;br /&gt;
Marijuana is a [[Schedule I]] [[Controlled Substance]] in the United States of America, meaning that it is an illegal substance under the law of the United States.  In a few countries, particularly in Western Europe, the substance is legal, but in other countries it is subject to much harsher criminal penalties than in the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some have advocated for decriminalization. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leap.cc Law Enforcement Against Prohibition]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Many people of varying political alignment advocate its legalization. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lp.org/issues/lp-oss.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many [[American]] [[conservative]]s, especially social conservatives, oppose legalization of marijuana in any form due to its harmful medical and emotional effects and its likelihood of harm to third parties due to drug-related crime and reckless driving. A few libertarian-leaning conservatives, most notably [[William F. Buckley]] and [[Larry Elder]], have advocated the decriminalization of this drug. Some [[liberal]]s support legalization, but most instead advocate for drug treatment and rehabilitation. [[Libertarian]]s are usually the biggest supporters of marijuana legalization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Illegal substances]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Illegal Drugs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Marijuana&amp;diff=816206</id>
		<title>Talk:Marijuana</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Marijuana&amp;diff=816206"/>
		<updated>2010-09-01T20:32:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Edit request on protected page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;  My largest concern is of a huge hypocrisy between two articles. In the &amp;quot;Liberalism&amp;quot; article it mentions how liberals in the U.S. demand government intervention much like socialism. But then this article claims that Liberals do not want marijuana to be regulated by the government. So...which is it, more or less government involvement? Or is that not pertinent to their view because it is constantly changing between all the concerns?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this entry a joke?  &amp;quot;Favored by many liberals, especially hippies&amp;quot;?  Yes, I can guess I can envision some liberals liking marijuana, but that doesn't mean that they all, or even most of them favor it conclusively.  And do hippies really even exist anymore?  It seems to be an antiquated/obsolete/broad term.  And I seem to recall our President having used marijuana and cocaine.  Hrm.  Essentially, this entry strikes me as a hilarious joke.  --[[User:WOVcenter|WOVcenter]] 18:17, 10 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Where are the citations for this article? Marijauna was not illegal until the Roosevelt administration. [[User:Cracker|Cracker]] 13:46, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where to start? Firstly Marijuana, or more correctly, Cannabis, is a Schedule I drug in the United States because all Tetrahydrocannabinols aside from synthetic THC are Schedule I. Many conservatives and liberals alike favor the legalization of Cannibis, and I agree with Cracker about the term hippie being rather antiquated. The effects of Cannabis can include the effects listed, along with others. It is no longer considered a gateway drug by the majority of researchers, this label is primarily only used by those opposed to its legalization. It's medicinal use is still hotly debated, but I think that the current information on its use in medicine is rather limited and should be expanded.  Lastly, why does in matter if Clinton smoked marijuana? This seems to be gossip at most. --[[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 16:10, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is well-known and well-sourced that legalization of Marijuana is a political position favored almost exclusively by liberals.  Hmm, do you think perhaps they want to legalize it because they smoke it?  --[[User:NVConservative|NVConservative]] 16:12, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm pretty sure NORML which is a advocacy group for the legalization of Marijuana includes many conservatives and Libertarians in its ranks.  And almost all Libertarians seek the legalization of Marijuana on the basis of principle not because they're users, after all less government interference is what they seek. --[[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 16:25, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ron Paul, Larry Elder and William Buckley are not liberal.--[[User:Nomine Cervus|Nomine Cervus]] 00:54, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Funny how the source given for liberals favoring legalizing marijuana is about Libertarians supporting its legalization. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 16:32, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, I definitely take the Libertarian view on this issue. If tobacco is going to be legal, this should be too. Needless regulation. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 04:09, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hooray for another supporter. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 04:10, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Illegal drug ==&lt;br /&gt;
Who keeps calling it an &amp;quot;illegal drug&amp;quot;? It is possible to get federal approval for using it, under the Controlled Substances Act. Furthermore, many states allow it under medical marijuana laws. Yes, the drug is commonly abused, and sold illegally, but it is not an illegal drug. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 20:18, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In nearly every concievable use, it is an illegal drug. Lots of illegal things can be done by people with a permit/approval, but that doesn't change the fact that they are almost always illegal. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:19, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: That is just not true. There are 1000s of legal medical marijuana users in California. There are some in other states as well.&lt;br /&gt;
:: The existence of illegal use does not make it an illegal drug. A lot of the Viagra use is derived from black-market purchases, but you would not call Viagra an illegal drug. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 20:48, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::How about &amp;quot;illegal in most states&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;legal in some states with prescription&amp;quot;; or &amp;quot;has been decriminalized in some states&amp;quot;. Something to that effect.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:02, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: 1000s of legal medical marijuana users in California, as opposed to California's population of 33.8 million. The U.S. kills hundreds, if not thousands, of death row inmates every year, in a perfectly legal manner. This doesn't mean that wanton killing is legal. And I really think it's usually considered an illegal drug. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:08, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Technically it is a &amp;quot;Controlled Substance&amp;quot; not an &amp;quot;Illegal Drug.&amp;quot; That way some people can use it, but if you don't have the proper authorization, it is illegal.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 23:09, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I think we can agree upon that wording? --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Perfect. And blatantly factual.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:53, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Actually, despite legalization by some states for medicinal purposes or private use in small quantities, it still remains a controlled substance by the federal government and is not allowed for medicinal or recreational use. Though it disappoints me, it still remains more or less illegal in the U.S. ([http://blog.washingtonpost.com/offbeat/2007/03/terminal_illness_is_no_excuse.html see here]) [[User:ColinR|ColinR]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:56, 23 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How can something put here by our Lord be made illegal? What grounds do we really have to override God?  Marijuana has proven Medicinal, entheogenic and social benefits, and also promotes creative and abstract thought.  In the Bible there is a possible reference to cannabis &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.” -- Genesis 1: 29-30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doesn't it seem slightly blasphemous to make one of Gods herbs illegal? [[User:Entheogenicorder|Entheogenicorder]] 16:53, 31 January 2008 (BDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Angel Raich ==&lt;br /&gt;
This section has been copied from wikiepedia and so I am removing it not only as a copyright violation but this is conservapedia and just brionging stuff from wikipedia defeats the point, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 13:27, 22 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DOES NOBODY HERE OWN A DICTIONARY? &amp;quot;Colloquial&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;slang&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;casual speech.&amp;quot; Marijuana is or is not an illegal drug, but it is not &amp;quot;colloquially known&amp;quot; as one. Marijuana is &amp;quot;colloquaily known&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 as pot, grass, weed, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appraisal of its effects/consequences ==&lt;br /&gt;
RobS is on one, ''again''. He just reverted this eminently sensible addition below. Does anyone else feel that this honest appraisal ''promotes'' its use?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In low doses, marijuana induces mild euphoria followed by a sense of general relaxation and well-being. Users often report heightened perceptions of music, colours and taste. Its effects at these doses are best likened to those of moderate alcohol consumption, but without the same degree of motor impairment and without the disinhibition towards aggression. Indeed, it is virtually impossible to start a fight when stoned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In higher doses, marijuana can induce mild to moderate hallucenations. Unlike the direct distortions of sense perception produced by [[LSD]] or [[psilocybin]], these hallucenations are mostly &amp;quot;internal,&amp;quot; i.e. they are simply functions of the user's hyper-stimulated imagination. There is a small risk of adverse side-effects and their likelihood increases with the dosage. They range from the merely inconvenient (short-term memory loss), through to the somewhat unnerving (paranoia/anxiety) and finally to the downright unpleasant (overwhelming disorientation/vomiting).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Chronic misuse of marijuana has been widely recognised as a significant risk factor for those with a predisposition towards developing various mental illnesses, particularly [[schizophrenia]]. Even for those without such a predisposition, chronic misuse oftens results in the user becoming both very bored and very boring. The key seems to be remembering what the word &amp;quot;recreational&amp;quot; means and moderating one's level of use accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Robledo|Robledo]] 18:07, 13 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservapedia is not going to use sales pitches to induce people to use illegal drugs.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:20, 13 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What the sweet ____ are you on about? I simply say what it does - from direct first hand experience, I might add. Have you ever been stoned, RobS? One of the key things in teaching kids about drugs is that you need to be truthful about ''why'' people use it. If you focus purely on the negatives, then your message is flatly contradicted by a wealth of anecdotal evidence from the child's peer group. You end up looking like an idiot and being completely ignored. --[[User:Robledo|Robledo]] 18:32, 13 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree: you really can't start a fight when stoned, just try the &amp;quot;left handed cigarette&amp;quot; once!&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Allegedly'' harmful affects. Would somebody please make the change. Unfortunately it would be unethical to perform an experiment that could conclude its harm, as it is a controlled substance. Kind of convenient for conservatives, eh? --[[User:TrueGrit|TrueGrit]] 22:44, 30 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can we unlock this article now so factual information may be added? It is rather annoying to see an article as important as this be locked for so long for reasons that amount to nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, most of the stuff seems... suspect. Especially the driving claim. A comparison against legal things, such as, say, alcohol would be nice. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 19:13, 16 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;harmful medical and emotional effects and its likelihood of harm to third parties due to drug-related crime and reckless driving&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
citation needed citation needed a thousand times CITATION NEEDED&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Request==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
this page is locked, but I wanted to make a few changes.  I wanted to remove the link from Larry Elder, as that page does not exsist.  I would also like to add a few things about the referendums in Colorado [[User:DrCB|Doctor CB]][[User_Talk:DrCB|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;The Doctor is In&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 18:40, 3 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reefer Madness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should add in something about the film &amp;quot;Reefer Madness&amp;quot; into this article. There is, in fact, a page on it. You can get there by clicking [[Reefer Madness|here]]. I think that this should be added because there is too much, well, negatives on the drug, and, I think that it would be humorous to add something about a very crappy, yet funny film. --[[User:Rocky|Rocky]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why locked? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sections on this page about marijuana effects is incomplete (it seems that there are only unpleasant effects listed). There is also very little information about the chemical compound THC itself, which I think would add a lot to the article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, why is this locked?  The article is missing lots of info; marijuana has ''already'' been decriminalized in parts of the U.S. [[User:Fantasia|Fantasia]] 19:41, 9 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference no longer exists ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.lp.org/issues/lp-oss.shtml &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It says the page no longer exists. Someone should remove or replace it. '''[[user:FernoKlump|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#000066&amp;quot; &amp;gt;FernoKlump&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]''' 19:52, 9 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article needs to be unlocked. Now. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 19:05, 16 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Um? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When will this article be unlocked?[[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 23:40, 8 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Allowed in the Bible ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.&amp;quot; (Gen 9:3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He causeth the grass to grow for the cattle, and herb for the service of man: that he may bring forth food out of the earth&amp;quot; (Psalms104:14)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This should be added for approval, or at least interpretation, for legalized Marijuana use, seeing as this is a Christian encyclopedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mistakes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I spotted some silly mistakes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Marijuana is not a drug and neither is Cannabis. THC is the most active drug compound and 'Marijuana' is Mexican-Spanish slang for the Cannabis Sativa plant. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The full name for THC is more correctly known as Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel the page is somewhat biased towards belittling the subject and why are no positive effects listed? Why only the supposed negative effects? Brum 21:25, 16 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Humor ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a pony in this race, but both sides might find this funny.&lt;br /&gt;
:http://www.criminalbrief.com/?p=5445&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cannabis is primarly a plant ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article lacks about the plant cannabis sativa l. At least you could add some information about origin, growth and historical use. The state of this article could lead to something like the extasy-plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edit request on protected page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please will an administrator change the first paragraph to the following.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;'''Marijuana''' is a drug that comes from the ''Cannabis'' [[plant]]. The main active ingredient in marijuana is [[Tetrahydrocannabinol|THC]], or tetrahydrocannabinol, an [[organic chemistry|organic chemical]] compound.&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reason: To direct link regarding an organic chemical to the appropriate page. Also correct typo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks. [[User:Barclay|Barclay]] 16:32, 1 September 2010 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Marijuana&amp;diff=815907</id>
		<title>Talk:Marijuana</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Marijuana&amp;diff=815907"/>
		<updated>2010-08-31T20:15:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Correct own edit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;  My largest concern is of a huge hypocrisy between two articles. In the &amp;quot;Liberalism&amp;quot; article it mentions how liberals in the U.S. demand government intervention much like socialism. But then this article claims that Liberals do not want marijuana to be regulated by the government. So...which is it, more or less government involvement? Or is that not pertinent to their view because it is constantly changing between all the concerns?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this entry a joke?  &amp;quot;Favored by many liberals, especially hippies&amp;quot;?  Yes, I can guess I can envision some liberals liking marijuana, but that doesn't mean that they all, or even most of them favor it conclusively.  And do hippies really even exist anymore?  It seems to be an antiquated/obsolete/broad term.  And I seem to recall our President having used marijuana and cocaine.  Hrm.  Essentially, this entry strikes me as a hilarious joke.  --[[User:WOVcenter|WOVcenter]] 18:17, 10 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Where are the citations for this article? Marijauna was not illegal until the Roosevelt administration. [[User:Cracker|Cracker]] 13:46, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where to start? Firstly Marijuana, or more correctly, Cannabis, is a Schedule I drug in the United States because all Tetrahydrocannabinols aside from synthetic THC are Schedule I. Many conservatives and liberals alike favor the legalization of Cannibis, and I agree with Cracker about the term hippie being rather antiquated. The effects of Cannabis can include the effects listed, along with others. It is no longer considered a gateway drug by the majority of researchers, this label is primarily only used by those opposed to its legalization. It's medicinal use is still hotly debated, but I think that the current information on its use in medicine is rather limited and should be expanded.  Lastly, why does in matter if Clinton smoked marijuana? This seems to be gossip at most. --[[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 16:10, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is well-known and well-sourced that legalization of Marijuana is a political position favored almost exclusively by liberals.  Hmm, do you think perhaps they want to legalize it because they smoke it?  --[[User:NVConservative|NVConservative]] 16:12, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm pretty sure NORML which is a advocacy group for the legalization of Marijuana includes many conservatives and Libertarians in its ranks.  And almost all Libertarians seek the legalization of Marijuana on the basis of principle not because they're users, after all less government interference is what they seek. --[[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 16:25, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ron Paul, Larry Elder and William Buckley are not liberal.--[[User:Nomine Cervus|Nomine Cervus]] 00:54, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Funny how the source given for liberals favoring legalizing marijuana is about Libertarians supporting its legalization. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 16:32, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, I definitely take the Libertarian view on this issue. If tobacco is going to be legal, this should be too. Needless regulation. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 04:09, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hooray for another supporter. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 04:10, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Illegal drug ==&lt;br /&gt;
Who keeps calling it an &amp;quot;illegal drug&amp;quot;? It is possible to get federal approval for using it, under the Controlled Substances Act. Furthermore, many states allow it under medical marijuana laws. Yes, the drug is commonly abused, and sold illegally, but it is not an illegal drug. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 20:18, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In nearly every concievable use, it is an illegal drug. Lots of illegal things can be done by people with a permit/approval, but that doesn't change the fact that they are almost always illegal. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:19, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: That is just not true. There are 1000s of legal medical marijuana users in California. There are some in other states as well.&lt;br /&gt;
:: The existence of illegal use does not make it an illegal drug. A lot of the Viagra use is derived from black-market purchases, but you would not call Viagra an illegal drug. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 20:48, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::How about &amp;quot;illegal in most states&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;legal in some states with prescription&amp;quot;; or &amp;quot;has been decriminalized in some states&amp;quot;. Something to that effect.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:02, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: 1000s of legal medical marijuana users in California, as opposed to California's population of 33.8 million. The U.S. kills hundreds, if not thousands, of death row inmates every year, in a perfectly legal manner. This doesn't mean that wanton killing is legal. And I really think it's usually considered an illegal drug. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:08, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Technically it is a &amp;quot;Controlled Substance&amp;quot; not an &amp;quot;Illegal Drug.&amp;quot; That way some people can use it, but if you don't have the proper authorization, it is illegal.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 23:09, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I think we can agree upon that wording? --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Perfect. And blatantly factual.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:53, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Actually, despite legalization by some states for medicinal purposes or private use in small quantities, it still remains a controlled substance by the federal government and is not allowed for medicinal or recreational use. Though it disappoints me, it still remains more or less illegal in the U.S. ([http://blog.washingtonpost.com/offbeat/2007/03/terminal_illness_is_no_excuse.html see here]) [[User:ColinR|ColinR]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:56, 23 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How can something put here by our Lord be made illegal? What grounds do we really have to override God?  Marijuana has proven Medicinal, entheogenic and social benefits, and also promotes creative and abstract thought.  In the Bible there is a possible reference to cannabis &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.” -- Genesis 1: 29-30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doesn't it seem slightly blasphemous to make one of Gods herbs illegal? [[User:Entheogenicorder|Entheogenicorder]] 16:53, 31 January 2008 (BDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Angel Raich ==&lt;br /&gt;
This section has been copied from wikiepedia and so I am removing it not only as a copyright violation but this is conservapedia and just brionging stuff from wikipedia defeats the point, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 13:27, 22 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DOES NOBODY HERE OWN A DICTIONARY? &amp;quot;Colloquial&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;slang&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;casual speech.&amp;quot; Marijuana is or is not an illegal drug, but it is not &amp;quot;colloquially known&amp;quot; as one. Marijuana is &amp;quot;colloquaily known&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 as pot, grass, weed, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appraisal of its effects/consequences ==&lt;br /&gt;
RobS is on one, ''again''. He just reverted this eminently sensible addition below. Does anyone else feel that this honest appraisal ''promotes'' its use?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In low doses, marijuana induces mild euphoria followed by a sense of general relaxation and well-being. Users often report heightened perceptions of music, colours and taste. Its effects at these doses are best likened to those of moderate alcohol consumption, but without the same degree of motor impairment and without the disinhibition towards aggression. Indeed, it is virtually impossible to start a fight when stoned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In higher doses, marijuana can induce mild to moderate hallucenations. Unlike the direct distortions of sense perception produced by [[LSD]] or [[psilocybin]], these hallucenations are mostly &amp;quot;internal,&amp;quot; i.e. they are simply functions of the user's hyper-stimulated imagination. There is a small risk of adverse side-effects and their likelihood increases with the dosage. They range from the merely inconvenient (short-term memory loss), through to the somewhat unnerving (paranoia/anxiety) and finally to the downright unpleasant (overwhelming disorientation/vomiting).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Chronic misuse of marijuana has been widely recognised as a significant risk factor for those with a predisposition towards developing various mental illnesses, particularly [[schizophrenia]]. Even for those without such a predisposition, chronic misuse oftens results in the user becoming both very bored and very boring. The key seems to be remembering what the word &amp;quot;recreational&amp;quot; means and moderating one's level of use accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Robledo|Robledo]] 18:07, 13 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservapedia is not going to use sales pitches to induce people to use illegal drugs.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:20, 13 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What the sweet ____ are you on about? I simply say what it does - from direct first hand experience, I might add. Have you ever been stoned, RobS? One of the key things in teaching kids about drugs is that you need to be truthful about ''why'' people use it. If you focus purely on the negatives, then your message is flatly contradicted by a wealth of anecdotal evidence from the child's peer group. You end up looking like an idiot and being completely ignored. --[[User:Robledo|Robledo]] 18:32, 13 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree: you really can't start a fight when stoned, just try the &amp;quot;left handed cigarette&amp;quot; once!&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Allegedly'' harmful affects. Would somebody please make the change. Unfortunately it would be unethical to perform an experiment that could conclude its harm, as it is a controlled substance. Kind of convenient for conservatives, eh? --[[User:TrueGrit|TrueGrit]] 22:44, 30 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can we unlock this article now so factual information may be added? It is rather annoying to see an article as important as this be locked for so long for reasons that amount to nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, most of the stuff seems... suspect. Especially the driving claim. A comparison against legal things, such as, say, alcohol would be nice. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 19:13, 16 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;harmful medical and emotional effects and its likelihood of harm to third parties due to drug-related crime and reckless driving&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
citation needed citation needed a thousand times CITATION NEEDED&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Request==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
this page is locked, but I wanted to make a few changes.  I wanted to remove the link from Larry Elder, as that page does not exsist.  I would also like to add a few things about the referendums in Colorado [[User:DrCB|Doctor CB]][[User_Talk:DrCB|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;The Doctor is In&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 18:40, 3 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reefer Madness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should add in something about the film &amp;quot;Reefer Madness&amp;quot; into this article. There is, in fact, a page on it. You can get there by clicking [[Reefer Madness|here]]. I think that this should be added because there is too much, well, negatives on the drug, and, I think that it would be humorous to add something about a very crappy, yet funny film. --[[User:Rocky|Rocky]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why locked? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sections on this page about marijuana effects is incomplete (it seems that there are only unpleasant effects listed). There is also very little information about the chemical compound THC itself, which I think would add a lot to the article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, why is this locked?  The article is missing lots of info; marijuana has ''already'' been decriminalized in parts of the U.S. [[User:Fantasia|Fantasia]] 19:41, 9 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference no longer exists ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.lp.org/issues/lp-oss.shtml &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It says the page no longer exists. Someone should remove or replace it. '''[[user:FernoKlump|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#000066&amp;quot; &amp;gt;FernoKlump&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]''' 19:52, 9 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article needs to be unlocked. Now. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 19:05, 16 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Um? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When will this article be unlocked?[[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 23:40, 8 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Allowed in the Bible ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.&amp;quot; (Gen 9:3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He causeth the grass to grow for the cattle, and herb for the service of man: that he may bring forth food out of the earth&amp;quot; (Psalms104:14)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This should be added for approval, or at least interpretation, for legalized Marijuana use, seeing as this is a Christian encyclopedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mistakes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I spotted some silly mistakes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Marijuana is not a drug and neither is Cannabis. THC is the most active drug compound and 'Marijuana' is Mexican-Spanish slang for the Cannabis Sativa plant. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The full name for THC is more correctly known as Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel the page is somewhat biased towards belittling the subject and why are no positive effects listed? Why only the supposed negative effects? Brum 21:25, 16 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Humor ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a pony in this race, but both sides might find this funny.&lt;br /&gt;
:http://www.criminalbrief.com/?p=5445&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cannabis is primarly a plant ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article lacks about the plant cannabis sativa l. At least you could add some information about origin, growth and historical use. The state of this article could lead to something like the extasy-plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edit request on protected page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please will an administrator change the first paragraph to the following.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Marijuana''' is a drug that comes from the ''Cannabis'' [[plant]]. The main active ingredient in marijuana is [[Tetrahydrocannabinol|THC]], or tetrahydrocannabinol, an [[organic chemistry|organic chemical]] compound.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reason: To direct link regarding an organic chemical to the appropriate page. Also correct typo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks. [[User:Barclay|Barclay]] 16:13, 31 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Marijuana&amp;diff=815903</id>
		<title>Talk:Marijuana</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Marijuana&amp;diff=815903"/>
		<updated>2010-08-31T20:13:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Edit request on protected page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;  My largest concern is of a huge hypocrisy between two articles. In the &amp;quot;Liberalism&amp;quot; article it mentions how liberals in the U.S. demand government intervention much like socialism. But then this article claims that Liberals do not want marijuana to be regulated by the government. So...which is it, more or less government involvement? Or is that not pertinent to their view because it is constantly changing between all the concerns?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this entry a joke?  &amp;quot;Favored by many liberals, especially hippies&amp;quot;?  Yes, I can guess I can envision some liberals liking marijuana, but that doesn't mean that they all, or even most of them favor it conclusively.  And do hippies really even exist anymore?  It seems to be an antiquated/obsolete/broad term.  And I seem to recall our President having used marijuana and cocaine.  Hrm.  Essentially, this entry strikes me as a hilarious joke.  --[[User:WOVcenter|WOVcenter]] 18:17, 10 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Where are the citations for this article? Marijauna was not illegal until the Roosevelt administration. [[User:Cracker|Cracker]] 13:46, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where to start? Firstly Marijuana, or more correctly, Cannabis, is a Schedule I drug in the United States because all Tetrahydrocannabinols aside from synthetic THC are Schedule I. Many conservatives and liberals alike favor the legalization of Cannibis, and I agree with Cracker about the term hippie being rather antiquated. The effects of Cannabis can include the effects listed, along with others. It is no longer considered a gateway drug by the majority of researchers, this label is primarily only used by those opposed to its legalization. It's medicinal use is still hotly debated, but I think that the current information on its use in medicine is rather limited and should be expanded.  Lastly, why does in matter if Clinton smoked marijuana? This seems to be gossip at most. --[[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 16:10, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is well-known and well-sourced that legalization of Marijuana is a political position favored almost exclusively by liberals.  Hmm, do you think perhaps they want to legalize it because they smoke it?  --[[User:NVConservative|NVConservative]] 16:12, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm pretty sure NORML which is a advocacy group for the legalization of Marijuana includes many conservatives and Libertarians in its ranks.  And almost all Libertarians seek the legalization of Marijuana on the basis of principle not because they're users, after all less government interference is what they seek. --[[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 16:25, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ron Paul, Larry Elder and William Buckley are not liberal.--[[User:Nomine Cervus|Nomine Cervus]] 00:54, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Funny how the source given for liberals favoring legalizing marijuana is about Libertarians supporting its legalization. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 16:32, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, I definitely take the Libertarian view on this issue. If tobacco is going to be legal, this should be too. Needless regulation. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 04:09, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hooray for another supporter. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 04:10, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Illegal drug ==&lt;br /&gt;
Who keeps calling it an &amp;quot;illegal drug&amp;quot;? It is possible to get federal approval for using it, under the Controlled Substances Act. Furthermore, many states allow it under medical marijuana laws. Yes, the drug is commonly abused, and sold illegally, but it is not an illegal drug. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 20:18, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In nearly every concievable use, it is an illegal drug. Lots of illegal things can be done by people with a permit/approval, but that doesn't change the fact that they are almost always illegal. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:19, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: That is just not true. There are 1000s of legal medical marijuana users in California. There are some in other states as well.&lt;br /&gt;
:: The existence of illegal use does not make it an illegal drug. A lot of the Viagra use is derived from black-market purchases, but you would not call Viagra an illegal drug. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 20:48, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::How about &amp;quot;illegal in most states&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;legal in some states with prescription&amp;quot;; or &amp;quot;has been decriminalized in some states&amp;quot;. Something to that effect.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:02, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: 1000s of legal medical marijuana users in California, as opposed to California's population of 33.8 million. The U.S. kills hundreds, if not thousands, of death row inmates every year, in a perfectly legal manner. This doesn't mean that wanton killing is legal. And I really think it's usually considered an illegal drug. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:08, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Technically it is a &amp;quot;Controlled Substance&amp;quot; not an &amp;quot;Illegal Drug.&amp;quot; That way some people can use it, but if you don't have the proper authorization, it is illegal.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 23:09, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I think we can agree upon that wording? --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Perfect. And blatantly factual.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:53, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Actually, despite legalization by some states for medicinal purposes or private use in small quantities, it still remains a controlled substance by the federal government and is not allowed for medicinal or recreational use. Though it disappoints me, it still remains more or less illegal in the U.S. ([http://blog.washingtonpost.com/offbeat/2007/03/terminal_illness_is_no_excuse.html see here]) [[User:ColinR|ColinR]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:56, 23 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How can something put here by our Lord be made illegal? What grounds do we really have to override God?  Marijuana has proven Medicinal, entheogenic and social benefits, and also promotes creative and abstract thought.  In the Bible there is a possible reference to cannabis &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.” -- Genesis 1: 29-30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doesn't it seem slightly blasphemous to make one of Gods herbs illegal? [[User:Entheogenicorder|Entheogenicorder]] 16:53, 31 January 2008 (BDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Angel Raich ==&lt;br /&gt;
This section has been copied from wikiepedia and so I am removing it not only as a copyright violation but this is conservapedia and just brionging stuff from wikipedia defeats the point, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 13:27, 22 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DOES NOBODY HERE OWN A DICTIONARY? &amp;quot;Colloquial&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;slang&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;casual speech.&amp;quot; Marijuana is or is not an illegal drug, but it is not &amp;quot;colloquially known&amp;quot; as one. Marijuana is &amp;quot;colloquaily known&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 as pot, grass, weed, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appraisal of its effects/consequences ==&lt;br /&gt;
RobS is on one, ''again''. He just reverted this eminently sensible addition below. Does anyone else feel that this honest appraisal ''promotes'' its use?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In low doses, marijuana induces mild euphoria followed by a sense of general relaxation and well-being. Users often report heightened perceptions of music, colours and taste. Its effects at these doses are best likened to those of moderate alcohol consumption, but without the same degree of motor impairment and without the disinhibition towards aggression. Indeed, it is virtually impossible to start a fight when stoned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In higher doses, marijuana can induce mild to moderate hallucenations. Unlike the direct distortions of sense perception produced by [[LSD]] or [[psilocybin]], these hallucenations are mostly &amp;quot;internal,&amp;quot; i.e. they are simply functions of the user's hyper-stimulated imagination. There is a small risk of adverse side-effects and their likelihood increases with the dosage. They range from the merely inconvenient (short-term memory loss), through to the somewhat unnerving (paranoia/anxiety) and finally to the downright unpleasant (overwhelming disorientation/vomiting).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Chronic misuse of marijuana has been widely recognised as a significant risk factor for those with a predisposition towards developing various mental illnesses, particularly [[schizophrenia]]. Even for those without such a predisposition, chronic misuse oftens results in the user becoming both very bored and very boring. The key seems to be remembering what the word &amp;quot;recreational&amp;quot; means and moderating one's level of use accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Robledo|Robledo]] 18:07, 13 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservapedia is not going to use sales pitches to induce people to use illegal drugs.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:20, 13 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What the sweet ____ are you on about? I simply say what it does - from direct first hand experience, I might add. Have you ever been stoned, RobS? One of the key things in teaching kids about drugs is that you need to be truthful about ''why'' people use it. If you focus purely on the negatives, then your message is flatly contradicted by a wealth of anecdotal evidence from the child's peer group. You end up looking like an idiot and being completely ignored. --[[User:Robledo|Robledo]] 18:32, 13 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree: you really can't start a fight when stoned, just try the &amp;quot;left handed cigarette&amp;quot; once!&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Allegedly'' harmful affects. Would somebody please make the change. Unfortunately it would be unethical to perform an experiment that could conclude its harm, as it is a controlled substance. Kind of convenient for conservatives, eh? --[[User:TrueGrit|TrueGrit]] 22:44, 30 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can we unlock this article now so factual information may be added? It is rather annoying to see an article as important as this be locked for so long for reasons that amount to nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, most of the stuff seems... suspect. Especially the driving claim. A comparison against legal things, such as, say, alcohol would be nice. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 19:13, 16 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;harmful medical and emotional effects and its likelihood of harm to third parties due to drug-related crime and reckless driving&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
citation needed citation needed a thousand times CITATION NEEDED&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Request==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
this page is locked, but I wanted to make a few changes.  I wanted to remove the link from Larry Elder, as that page does not exsist.  I would also like to add a few things about the referendums in Colorado [[User:DrCB|Doctor CB]][[User_Talk:DrCB|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;The Doctor is In&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 18:40, 3 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reefer Madness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should add in something about the film &amp;quot;Reefer Madness&amp;quot; into this article. There is, in fact, a page on it. You can get there by clicking [[Reefer Madness|here]]. I think that this should be added because there is too much, well, negatives on the drug, and, I think that it would be humorous to add something about a very crappy, yet funny film. --[[User:Rocky|Rocky]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why locked? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sections on this page about marijuana effects is incomplete (it seems that there are only unpleasant effects listed). There is also very little information about the chemical compound THC itself, which I think would add a lot to the article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, why is this locked?  The article is missing lots of info; marijuana has ''already'' been decriminalized in parts of the U.S. [[User:Fantasia|Fantasia]] 19:41, 9 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference no longer exists ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.lp.org/issues/lp-oss.shtml &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It says the page no longer exists. Someone should remove or replace it. '''[[user:FernoKlump|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#000066&amp;quot; &amp;gt;FernoKlump&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]''' 19:52, 9 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article needs to be unlocked. Now. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 19:05, 16 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Um? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When will this article be unlocked?[[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 23:40, 8 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Allowed in the Bible ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.&amp;quot; (Gen 9:3). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He causeth the grass to grow for the cattle, and herb for the service of man: that he may bring forth food out of the earth&amp;quot; (Psalms104:14)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This should be added for approval, or at least interpretation, for legalized Marijuana use, seeing as this is a Christian encyclopedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mistakes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I spotted some silly mistakes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Marijuana is not a drug and neither is Cannabis. THC is the most active drug compound and 'Marijuana' is Mexican-Spanish slang for the Cannabis Sativa plant. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The full name for THC is more correctly known as Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel the page is somewhat biased towards belittling the subject and why are no positive effects listed? Why only the supposed negative effects? Brum 21:25, 16 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Humor ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a pony in this race, but both sides might find this funny.&lt;br /&gt;
:http://www.criminalbrief.com/?p=5445&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cannabis is primarly a plant ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article lacks about the plant cannabis sativa l. At least you could add some information about origin, growth and historical use. The state of this article could lead to something like the extasy-plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edit request on protected page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please will an administrator change the first paragraph to the following.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Marijuana''' is drug that comes from the ''Cannabis'' [[plant]]. The main active ingredient in marijuana is [[Tetrahydrocannabinol|THC]], or tetrahydrocannabinol, an [[organic chemistry|organic chemical]] compound.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reason: To direct link regarding an organic chemical to the appropriate page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks. [[User:Barclay|Barclay]] 16:13, 31 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Crystal_meth&amp;diff=815896</id>
		<title>Crystal meth</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Crystal_meth&amp;diff=815896"/>
		<updated>2010-08-31T20:04:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Redirected page to Methamphetamine&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Methamphetamine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=David_Cameron&amp;diff=814128</id>
		<title>David Cameron</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=David_Cameron&amp;diff=814128"/>
		<updated>2010-08-27T20:46:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: UK spelling in UK article.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Prime Minister&lt;br /&gt;
|image=674uyyhju.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|seq=75&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start=May 11 2010&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end=present&lt;br /&gt;
|previous=Gordon Brown&lt;br /&gt;
|party=Conservative Party&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_date=October 6, 1966&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_place=London&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Samantha Sheffield&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Church of England]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''David Cameron''', born 9 October 1966, is the current Prime Minister of the [[United Kingdom]] and leader of the British [[Conservative Party]]. Following the May 2010 election, the Conservatives won the most seats but were short of a majority, resulting in a hung parliament. Labour Leader [[Gordon Brown]] resigned, and Cameron was appointed Prime Minister, leading a Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Personal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron was born in [[London]], but spent his early years near Wantage in [[Oxfordshire]], [[England]], though his family's roots lie in [[Inverness]], [[Scotland]], and &amp;quot;Cameron&amp;quot; is well known in Britain as a Scottish name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron was educated at [[Eton College | Eton]], Britain's most prestigious public school (a &amp;quot;public school&amp;quot; in the UK referring to a privately run institution, as opposed to a &amp;quot;state school&amp;quot;), and at [[Brasenose College]], [[Oxford University|Oxford]], Britain's most ancient and prestigious university.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron is self-described as &amp;quot;upper middle class&amp;quot;, though his bloodline is noble, and he is a direct descendent of William IV, and thus a distant cousin of HRH Queen Elizabeth II. His family has historically been involved in finance and banking, with his great great grandfather being head of HSBC in the late 19th century, and worked alongside the Rothschilds to finance the Russo-Japanese war. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron's leadership and indeed his own party are supported by businesses, as opposed to the liberal, socialist aligned Labour Party, led by the fellow Scotsman [[Gordon Brown]]; who are funded and largely controlled by the [[trade union]]s. Many intervening leaders have been middle-class ([[Edward Heath]], [[Margaret Thatcher]]) or even working-class ([[John Major]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron's reluctance to discuss his past, citing the right to a private life before politics&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4340328.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; has led to class-based attacks on his education and ancestry from a small proportion of media sources and opposition members of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He has been married to Samantha since 1996.  She is of direct noble bloodline, the daughter of 8th Baronet Sheffield, and a descendent of Charles II. They have two sons and a daughter. Their eldest son, Ivan Cameron, died on February 25, 2009.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[BBC News]] - [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7909562.stm Cameron's 'beautiful boy' dies]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political career==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron's pre-parliamentary career included spells as a staffer for controversial Conservative politician [[Norman Lamont]] and as a PR executive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron was elected to Parliament as MP for Witney in Oxfordshire at the 2001 general election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron was elected leader of the [[Conservative Party]] in December 2005, succeeding [[Michael Howard]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late June 2007, at the end of then-Prime Minister [[Tony Blair]]'s final Prime Minister's Questions session in the [[House of Commons]], David Cameron led his opposition party in giving the outgoing leader a standing ovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1555758/Tony-Blair-steps-down-to-a-standing-ovation.html Tony Blair steps down to standing ovation] - Daily Telegraph, June 27, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Policies==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron has attempted to move the Conservative party towards what is perceived by some to be the centre ground of British politics. While the party under his leadership has expressed support for some traditional elements of Conservative policy, such as the importance of the [[family]], Cameron has also expressed a passionate concern about [[global warming]]. He has suggested a move towards [[privatization]] within the strongly-socialist [[National Health Service]], in an attempt to combat the economic failures resulting from the flawed socialist ideas upon which the organisation is based. Designed and originated by the leftist [[Labour Party]], the organisation is notorious for its bureaucracy and the failure of its left-wing values in an economic sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some traditional Conservatives, particularly those on the [[Thatcherism|Thatcherite]] wing of the party, have criticized Cameron for moving the party too far to the left. They point to surveys showing that many voters feel they no longer know what the Conservative Party stands for.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.yougov.com/archives/pdf/TEL060101018_1.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, he has stated that he is &amp;quot;certainly a big [[Margaret Thatcher|Thatcher]] fan, but I don't know whether that makes me a Thatcherite.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;new identity&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4446864.stm &amp;quot;Cameron: Tories need new identity&amp;quot;], ''BBC News Online'', 17 November 2005, accessed 6 November 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He has also described himself as a &amp;quot;liberal Conservative&amp;quot; (though &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in British English does not have the same meaning as in the United States, and instead has the meaning of &amp;quot;centrist&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot;).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Rawnsley&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Andrew Rawnsley, [http://observer.guardian.co.uk/focus/story/0,,1669957,00.html &amp;quot;'I'm not a deeply ideological person. I'm a practical one'&amp;quot;], ''Guardian Unlimited'', 18 December 2005, accessed 6 November 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some have gone so far as to claim that true conservatism is today represented in Britain not by the Conservative Party but by the [[UK Independence Party]]. On the other hand, the approval ratings of Cameron and his party continue to compare very favourably with those of the Labour Party and its leadership, which is undoubtedly unpopular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron has said: &amp;quot;My aim is to promote social justice, making sure that everyone has access to good schools, good healthcare and decent housing, take a lead in ending global poverty and do all we can to meet the great environmental threats of our age.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservatives.com/tile.do?def=david.cameron.about.page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some conservative politicians and commentators, notably [[Norman Tebbit]], have criticised him for prioritising issues of the environment and social justice over more traditionally Conservative policy areas, such as tax, immigration and foreign relations. Tebbit said: &amp;quot;Is he the party's [[Chairman Mao]] or [[Pol Pot]], intent on purging even the memory and name of [[Margaret Thatcher|Thatcherism]] before building a new modern compassionate green globally aware party somewhere on the left side of the middle?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;g1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://politics.guardian.co.uk/conservatives/story/0,,1698576,00.html Tories must retake centre ground says Cameron], ''Guardian Unlimited'', 31 January 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, Cameron has responded extensively to such criticisms by pointing out that the economic and social problems faced by modern-day Britain are radically different from those faced in the past; he has argued that the Conservative Party needs to re-take the [[centrist|centre ground]] of politics from the [[Labour Party]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bbc1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4661024.stm Cameron denies 'betraying' Tories], BBC News, 30 January 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He argued: &amp;quot;The change is not a betrayal. It is a recognition that the challenges faced by Britain are not the challenges of the 1970s. Social justice and economic efficiency are the common ground of British politics. We have to find the means of succeeding where the government has failed.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;g1&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 16, 2008, Cameron followed President [[George Bush]] in criticising [[Russia]]'s invasion of [[Georgia]] during a visit to the war-torn region.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jl825geip9c65_-FTHTC_3wzMy0Q Cameron in Georgia slams 'invading' Russia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[British politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.mydavidcameron.com/ Cameron Election Campaign 2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Cameron, David}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: United Kingdom]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: United Kingdom Prime Ministers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:British Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Google&amp;diff=696002</id>
		<title>Google</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Google&amp;diff=696002"/>
		<updated>2009-08-25T20:39:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Correct typo and add link.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Google''' is a company whose primary business is [[Internet]]-based services, including an extremely popular [[search engine]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Google is associated with [[liberal]] causes and has been criticized for catering to communist [[China]] in censoring information from the people as requested by dictators:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4647398.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Reporters Without Borders joined others in asking how Google could stand up for US users' freedoms while controlling what Chinese users can search for.  Its previous search engine for China's fast-growing market was subject to government blocks.  The new site - Google.cn - censors itself to satisfy Beijing. While cooperating with China's govenment, Google refuses to fulfill requests by the U.S. Department of Justice. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4630694.stm , BBC Google defies US over search data, January 20, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Google counsel Nicole Wong said &amp;quot;..we intend to resist their motion vigorously.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Google has also been accused of delisting [[conservative]] news sites from its search engine.  As one of many examples, &amp;quot;In February 2005, [[Michelle Malkin]] wrote of the difficulties she was having becoming part of Google News.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/node/5477&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much of Google's business depends on pornography.  For example, 25% of search engine requests are for pornography.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://internet-filter-review.toptenreviews.com/internet-pornography-statistics.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, although claiming to generally avoid getting involved in matters outside their field, Google officially supports the [[liberal]] and [[social libertarian]] cause of so-called &amp;quot;[[same sex marriage]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/our-position-on-californias-no-on-8.html , Our position on California's No on 8 campaign&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  On June 21, 2009, Google displayed a special multicolored line for searches on the word &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; as a subtle way of making it appear more attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Corporate Information ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CEO of Google since 2001 is [[Eric Schmidt]]. Google is headquartered in Mountain View, [[California]]. Google was founded on September 7th, 1998, by [[Larry Page]] and [[Sergey Brin]]. Since then, it has grown to be the largest internet search engine in the world. According to Alexa Internet, over 25% of all Internet users visit Google monthly.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=www.google.com Alexa Traffic Results for Google]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Google also owns [[YouTube]], the homemade [[video clip]] site. [[Viacom]] is suing YouTube, and thus Google, for a reported $1 billion, arguing that the economic model of YouTube is based on copyright infringement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6446193.stm Viacom will sue YouTube for $1bn]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Google2.gif|thumb|right|300px| &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Google's logo on [[Earth day]], April 22, 2007.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Founding===&lt;br /&gt;
Google was originally a research project, started by Larry Page and Sergey Brin in 1996, when the two attended [[Stanford University]]. The two registered the domain name ''google.stanford.edu'', and the small search engine went online for the first time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.google.com/intl/en/corporate/history.html Corporate Information:Google Milestones]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Google Code of Conduct &amp;quot;Don't be evil&amp;quot;. On their investor relations website, it reads &amp;quot;It's built around the recognition that everything we do in connection with our work at Google will be, and should be, measured against the highest possible standards&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://investor.google.com/conduct.html Google Code of Conduct]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They are being held to that standard{{fact}}&amp;lt;!-- who is holding them to that standard? --&amp;gt; and they are missing the mark badly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Google versus Net neutrality==&lt;br /&gt;
Neil Stevens of Redstate.com notes that Google says one thing and does another, tarnishing their reputation in the process. He lists where Google emphasizes support then does what they want in regards to shutting down access. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens/2009/08/23/google-undermines-the-internet/ Google undermines the Internet, RedState.com, August 23, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Exhibit A: Google supports ‘[[net neutrality]]’&lt;br /&gt;
*Exhibit B: Google is set to argue against Apple’s blocking of Google Voice from iPhones&lt;br /&gt;
*Exhibit C: Google blocks Skype from Android-based phones&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secular Progressive Culture==&lt;br /&gt;
Google's West Coast headquarters hires a majority of left-leaning personalities, explicitly in executive decision-making.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [http://www.google.com/corporate/execs.html] for a list of board members and senior staff.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Google supports causes that are a radical departure from traditional American views, such as their public support of a 'no' vote for [[California]]'s [[Proposition 8]], which defined marriage as being between a husband and wife. Also in a subtle way, they favor politically-correct global liberalism, championed by secular progressives. They select certain ''days of importance'' for tribute, some of which are controversial.&amp;lt;!-- commenting out the following as it's not clear what it means: some are for lack of observance.--&amp;gt; As such, ''Merry Christmas'' is replaced by ''Happy Holidays''. Even though, poll &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.prweb.com/releases/2008/11/prweb1670824.htm Wish Me A Merry Christmas Campaign Crusades to Change Retail Culture] PRWeb, November 26, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; after poll &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/68_prefer_merry_christmas_to_happy_holidays 68% Prefer “Merry Christmas” to “Happy Holidays”] Rasmussen, November 27, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; after poll &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/12/20/poll.season/ Poll: More Americans prefer 'Merry Christmas' greeting] CNN, December 20, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; shows the public prefers 'Merry Christmas'. The problem may be that Google doesn't respect traditional [[Christian]] holidays, in favor of a 'culturally-correct' approach. In addition, Google accepts the [[Theory of Evolution]] by [[Charles Darwin]] as fact, promotes Darwin on their homepage with a Google Doodle logo. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[Scientists unveil fossil of Darwinius masillae]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Google often honors Russia with their logo of Sputnik and for composer Igor Stravinsky. June 14 Flag Day in the [[United States]], Google did not honor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google versus Conservatives ===&lt;br /&gt;
Many instances whereby [[information]] is comprised ideologically and displayed for the masses. Watchdog website NewsBusters.org published that Google had in fact labeled [[conservative]] [[American Spectator]] as &amp;quot;This site may harm your computer.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/12/28/google-claims-american-spectator-site-may-harm-your-computer Google Claims Conservative Website ‘May Harm Your Computer’] December 28,2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Google continues to block pro-family website [http://www.massresistance.org/ MassResistance]. Some people complain his organization promotes hatred towards homosexuals. Google gives the standard legal trash as an excuse &amp;quot;'Users may not publish material that promotes hate towards groups based on race, ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status, and sexual orientation/gender identity.'&amp;quot; MassResistance replies &amp;quot;Of course we are not promoting hate against anybody.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=603372 Accusation: Google targets, blocks pro-family website again OneNewsNow.com, July 15,2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[YouTube]] owner, Google continues to protect [[Planned Parenthood]] by removing undercover videos exposing abortion clinic law-breaking. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/7416111014.html YouTube Bans Student Group's Video Showing Abuse at Planned Parenthood Christian News Wire, July 21, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google versus Anti- Obama Blogs ===&lt;br /&gt;
The question immediately raised, &amp;quot;Did Google Silence [[Barack Obama]] critics?&amp;quot; It turns out, no they did not. A group of separate blogs were targeted by their spam filter as a result of manipulating the 'flag' feature. This caused a  temporary blockage for five days. Sites affected were Hillary supporters and all anti-Obama. They include http://bluelyon.blogspot.com, http://comealongway.blogspot.com, http://hillaryorbust.blogspot.com and http://mccaindemocrats.blogspot.com and their main associate JustSayNoDeal.com &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/30/google-and-the-anti-obama-bloggers/ Google and the Anti-Obama Bloggers] NYTimes June 30, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Google versus Bing ==&lt;br /&gt;
Microsoft has been aggressively competing with Google for a larger share of the search market. Their latest effort Bing.com, is the next generation search service which looks very promising. June 14 Flag Day, Google refused to honor with an American flag, Bing prominently displayed [[Old Glory]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Google Goes Public==&lt;br /&gt;
===Growth===&lt;br /&gt;
The year Google was created 1998, it had amassed 26 million unique URLs in their database. By 2000, Google had indexed more than 1 billion pages. As of July 2008, Google has indexed over 1 [[trillion]] pages. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-9999814-93.html Google reveals scope of Web-crawling task] CNET News, July 25, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Purchase of Smaller Parties===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Google bombing ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps the most innovative contribution Google has made to internet searching is its '''PageRank''' algorithm. This system works by counting the number of sites that link to another site; the more links pointing to a page, the higher that page will be ranked. The engine also takes note of how often the page is updated. Due to this, [[Wikipedia]] is consistently ranked very highly by Google, due to its constant updating and heavy linkage. More recently, internet-savvy Googlers have discovered ways to game the system; creating massive numbers of pages with links pointing to one page to form what is known as a &amp;quot;Google Bomb&amp;quot;. Some examples can be found below.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040614/news_mz1b14google.html Dropping 'Google-bombs']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Miserable Failure&amp;quot;''': For nearly two years, typing &amp;quot;miserable failure&amp;quot; (or even just &amp;quot;miserable&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;failure&amp;quot;) and then clicking &amp;quot;I'm Feeling Lucky&amp;quot; in the Google search engine would return the [http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/biography.html White House Biography] of [[George W. Bush]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3298443.stm 'Miserable failure' links to Bush]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was orchestrated by [[Democratic]] Party supporters in late 2003,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/01/26/BUG3M4GVDS1.DTL In October, Johnson, a Democrat, added the phrase &amp;quot;miserable failure&amp;quot; to his Web site, Old Fashioned Patriot. He then linked the site to the online White House biography of President Bush and asked others to follow his lead]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as part of the 2004 Presidential election. However, at times, [[Conservative]] supporters were able to shift the phrase to [[Jimmy Carter]], [[Hillary Clinton]] and [[Michael Moore]].&lt;br /&gt;
*''''&amp;quot;Great President&amp;quot;''': returns the [http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/biography.html White House Biography] of [[George W. Bush]].&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Waffles&amp;quot;''': Also as part of the 2004 Presidential election, Conservative supporters managed to link the term &amp;quot;waffles&amp;quot; to the official website of [[John Kerry]].&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;French Military Victories&amp;quot;''': Hitting &amp;quot;I'm Feeling Lucky&amp;quot; for this term directs you to a fake Google page (in reality, it is an [[AlbinoBlackSheep]].com page, styled to look exactly like a Google page, [http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/victories.html here]) giving no matches, and asking if you meant &amp;quot;French military defeats?&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Weapons of Mass Destruction&amp;quot;''' would bring up a similar page with the error message 'not found.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 25, 2007, Google claimed to have modified their PageRank algorithm to lessen the likelihood of future Google bombs&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://boingboing.net/2007/01/26/bush_no_longer_miser.html Bush no longer &amp;quot;miserable failure&amp;quot;: Google tackles googlebombs]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Privacy Concerns==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Google has been criticized by privacy activists and others. Recently, Google chief executive Eric Schmidt said, &amp;quot;We cannot even answer the most basic questions because we don’t know enough about you. That is the most important aspect of Google’s expansion.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/c3e49548-088e-11dc-b11e-000b5df10621,dwp_uuid=e8477cc4-c820-11db-b0dc-000b5df10621.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Google has attempted to &amp;quot;remedy&amp;quot; this situation by storing search information, in effect, keeping tabs on people for two years after they search. This has led Google critic Daniel Brandt to create &amp;quot;Scroogle.org&amp;quot;, which runs Google searches that users conduct through his organization's personal servers to prevent Google from being able to connect any personal information to the searchers. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55935&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Google]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Websites]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=London_Borough_of_Hounslow&amp;diff=623454</id>
		<title>London Borough of Hounslow</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=London_Borough_of_Hounslow&amp;diff=623454"/>
		<updated>2009-02-13T21:55:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Correct typo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''London Borough of Hounslow''' is an administrative division of [[Greater London]], located in the western part of the capital. The administrative and main retail centre is [[Hounslow]]; other districts include Brentford, [[Chiswick]], Feltham, Hanworth, Heston and Isleworth. It is largely suburban, with light industrial areas along the [[Great West Road]] and in the west of the borough, which borders [[London Heathrow Airport]]. The borough was formed in 1965 by the amalgamation of the Municipal Borough of Brentford and Chiswick, the Municipal Borough of Heston and Isleworth, and Feltham Urban District.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:London]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Macclesfield&amp;diff=598036</id>
		<title>Macclesfield</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Macclesfield&amp;diff=598036"/>
		<updated>2008-12-31T16:41:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: New page: '''Macclesfield''' is a town in Cheshire, England through which the River Bollin flows.   Historically many silk products were manufactured in the town and the textile indu...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Macclesfield''' is a town in [[Cheshire]], [[England]] through which the River Bollin flows. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically many [[silk]] products were manufactured in the town and the [[textile]] industry is still significant. AstraZeneca manufacture pharmaceutical products in the town.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Macclesfield railway station is on a branch of the West Coast Main Line from [[Manchester]] to [[London]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Macclesfield Town Football Club play in the English Football League Two ([[soccer]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its population is 50,688 (2001).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Cities and Towns]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminist_theory&amp;diff=563943</id>
		<title>Feminist theory</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminist_theory&amp;diff=563943"/>
		<updated>2008-11-20T17:52:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Remove unnecessary red link.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Feminist theory''', in the mid- to late 1970s, looked at [[gender]] as a system of signs, or signifiers, assigned to sexually dimorphic bodies, which served to differentiate the [[social role]]s and meanings those bodies could have. Feminist theory thus argued that gender was a [[social construct]], something designed and implemented and perpetuated by social organizations and structures, rather than something merely &amp;quot;[[true]],&amp;quot; something [[innate]] to the ways bodies worked on a biological level. In so doing, feminist theory made two very important contributions. The first is that feminist theory separated the social from the biological, insisting that we see a difference between what is the product of human ideas, hence something [[mutable]] and changeable, and what is the product of biology, hence something (relatively) stable and [[unchangeable]]. The second contribution is related to the first: by separating the social and the biological, the constructed and the innate, feminist theory insisted that gender was not something &amp;quot;essential&amp;quot; to an individual's [[identity]]. [http://www.colorado.edu/English/courses/ENGL2012Klages/queertheory.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Quotes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conscience&amp;diff=563942</id>
		<title>Conscience</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conscience&amp;diff=563942"/>
		<updated>2008-11-20T17:51:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Remove unnecessary red link.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Conscience''' is the human sense of what is right and wrong.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Conscience is the inward [[morality|moral]] sense of what is right and what is wrong, the drive toward meaning and contribution. It is the guiding force to [[vision]], [[discipline]] and [[passion]]. It stands in stark contrast to the life dominated by [[ego]].&amp;quot; ''The 8th Habit'', Steven R. Covey, page 66&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:philosophy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Runcorn&amp;diff=510671</id>
		<title>Runcorn</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Runcorn&amp;diff=510671"/>
		<updated>2008-09-04T18:04:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: New page: '''Runcorn''' is a town in Cheshire, England on the south side of the River Mersey. It is a port on the Manchester Ship Canal.  Ineos manufacture chemicals in the town. The...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Runcorn''' is a town in [[Cheshire]], [[England]] on the south side of the [[River Mersey]]. It is a port on the [[Manchester Ship Canal]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ineos manufacture chemicals in the town. The sites were previously owned by ICI (Imperial Chemical Industries).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Halton Castle (ruined) is the town’s most significant landmark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Runcorn-Widnes bridge (A533) is the lowest road bridge crossing on the River Mersey and is free to cross. The Mersey Road tunnels (further down river) are toll crossings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Runcorn railway station is on a spur of the West Coast Main Line from [[Liverpool]] to [[London]]. Runcorn East railway station is on the line from [[Chester]] to [[Manchester]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Runcorn Linnets Football Club ([[soccer]]) play in a semi-professional regional league.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its population is 61,000 (2001).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Cities and Towns]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Propaganda&amp;diff=500040</id>
		<title>Propaganda</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Propaganda&amp;diff=500040"/>
		<updated>2008-08-16T12:33:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Undo revision 500034 by Smithy (Talk) Silly addition&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Propaganda]] ([[Latin]] ''propaganda'' feminine ablative gerundive of ''propago'' I am spreading) is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Any idea, fact, rumor, or lie, or a wider body of same, which one circulates, publishes, or otherwise spreads by deliberate conscious effort in order to advance or hinder any given cause. This includes activity by a government to instill fear of that government's enemies, either in time of [[war]] or as a prelude to war, especially if the information that the government is promulgating is false.&lt;br /&gt;
# The act of circulating, publishing, or otherwise spreading any of the above with the manifest intent to advance or hinder a cause, or help or injure a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History of the term ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first recorded use of the term, according to Merriam-Webster, was as a shortened name of the ''Congregatio de Propaganda Fide'', literally, &amp;quot;The congregation for spreading the faith.&amp;quot; This group, part of the Vatican staff, is in essence the missions board of the [[Roman Catholic Church]]. The founder of this board was Pope Gregory XV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, originally, the term ''propaganda'' was a neutral term. It meant simply the act of ''propagating'' a viewpoint, the process for doing the same, or a group specifically charged with such activity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, propaganda is anything under the above headings employed to advance any religious or political cause, or to damage an opposing cause. But the word ''propaganda'' now has a decidedly negative connotation. Whatever is spread must not merely be in aid of one cause and/or opposed to another, but must also be ''false, misleading, and/or out of its proper context.'' Or, if what is spread is true, then it is spread in a ''manner unbecoming a truthful witness.'' As such, it includes [[Logical fallacy|logical fallacies]], ''unsubstantiated'' rumors, and other sayings that the teller/spreader knows, or ought to know, are lies. It also includes modes of presentation that, through negligence, recklessness, knowledge, or intent, give offense, especially to the holders of contrary views.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Types of propaganda ==&lt;br /&gt;
The specific sayings or modes of presentation that constitute propaganda are legion. The common element in them is an appeal to ''emotion'' rather than to [[logic]]. Truth or fact, logically presented, might stir the emotions--but a presentation ''manifestly intended'' to stir the emotions demeans the information being presented. Of course, if the information is false to begin with, then propagandistic methods might be the only methods that would serve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Angels are bright still, though the brightest fell.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Though all things foul would wear the look of grace,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yet grace must still look so.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: ''[[MacBeth]]'' IV.iii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Propaganda typically takes any of these forms, or a combination of them:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Name calling. This is the crudest and least savory form of [[Logical fallacy#Argumentum ad hominem|argumentum ad hominem]]. It consists of labeling the other cause, or a generic or particular adherent of that cause, with a noun or adjective having a decidedly negative &amp;quot;buzz&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;charge.&amp;quot; Name-calling is also a part of the [[Logical fallacy#Genetic fallacy|genetic fallacy]] of endorsing, or casting doubt upon, a proposition merely by calling attention to its source, when the nature of the source does not bear on the quality of the propositions that come from that source.&lt;br /&gt;
# Half-truths. The hallmark of this is that half the things being said are true and the other half false.&lt;br /&gt;
# Testimonials. This is a form of [[Logical fallacy#Proof by authority|argumentum ab auctoritate]]. A &amp;quot;celebrity endorsement&amp;quot; is a prime example. So, too, is any speech or essay by one publicly celebrated as an athlete, actor in any form of [[theater]], or other such person, on a subject in which the author has no legitimate expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Loaded question|Loaded questions]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Distortions of fact.&lt;br /&gt;
# Extreme pronouncements, which are a form of [[Logical fallacy#Overgeneralization|over-generalizations]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Intimidation. This may include [[Logical fallacy#Proof by numbers|arguing from the numbers]] or reminding an opponent of the power of the particular individual or group engaging in the intimidation--or of an individual or group for which one claims to speak.&lt;br /&gt;
# Using abridged or out of context quotes to give a false impression, aka [[Quote mining]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Sayings that, however factual, fall outside the scope or even off the topic at hand. A [[Law|lawyer]] would say that such facts are &amp;quot;incompetent, irrelevant and immaterial&amp;quot;--because they do not serve to advance a [[logic|logical]] argument, are not properly related to the case at hand, and do not matter.&lt;br /&gt;
# Outright lies. Dr. [[Josef Goebbels]], Minister of Propaganda for [[Adolf Hitler]], famously observed that if one tells a lie loudly enough and often enough, people will believe it rather than believe that anyone could lie so outrageously.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uses of propaganda in society today ==&lt;br /&gt;
Propaganda has now become the favorite method of [[politics]]. Both politicians and the commentators that support them routinely engage in it. This has contributed, especially in the [[United States]] but also in other democratic republics throughout the world, to a coarsening of civil discourse and, some say, a severe weakening of civility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to civility, the idea of truth suffers from the habitual use of propaganda. Current-events organs that willfully publish propagandistic content not only contribute to the problem, but also demean themselves. In one famous example ([[Rathergate]]), a [[television]] broadcast network circulated for weeks certain memoranda, the contents of which were damaging to the incumbent President of the [[United States]] ([[George W. Bush]]), though those who obtained those memoranda knew, or ought to have known, that they were forgeries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Theater]] has been an instrument of propaganda since before such things as current-events organs existed. Significantly, however, whenever theater has lent itself to propaganda, it has always demeaned itself. Even [[William Shakespeare]] was not immune to this. His play ''[[The Merchant of Venice]]'' is, as any objective observer must attest, a piece of [[Anti-Semitism|anti-Semitic]] propaganda of a very crude sort. Critics have historically decried it as one of the least becoming of Shakespeare's works.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Counter-propaganda ==&lt;br /&gt;
The best contrary testimony against propaganda is the truth. This typically means revealing the full, previously undisclosed context and exposing [[Logical fallacy|logical fallacies]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond this, it includes discernment of news organs that allow themselves to be utilized for propaganda purposes, discernment of propagandistic theater projects and refusal to patronize the same, and discernment of the content of political commentary, and its judgment, not merely on matters of fact, but also on the ''presentation'' of that fact. As has been said above, presentation even of perfectly relevant fact in a manner intended to manipulate the emotions, demeans the facts thus presented and also demeans the presenter. Above all, therefore, those who decry propaganda ought not engage in it themselves, nor give even the appearance of the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related References ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?sourceid=Mozilla-search&amp;amp;va=Propaganda Propaganda] in the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.creationsafaris.com/crevbd.htm#propaganda Propaganda Tactics] at &amp;quot;The Baloney Detector&amp;quot; at Creation-Evolution Headlines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Logical fallacy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Caer&amp;diff=499766</id>
		<title>Caer</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Caer&amp;diff=499766"/>
		<updated>2008-08-15T14:39:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Redirecting to Chester&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Chester]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Soccer_teams_in_England&amp;diff=489526</id>
		<title>Soccer teams in England</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Soccer_teams_in_England&amp;diff=489526"/>
		<updated>2008-07-12T18:05:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Display team name correctly - use nowiki tags to prevent town name snagging on filter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The game of [[soccer|football]] in [[England]] - known as ''soccer'' in other parts of the world - is organised into four professional leagues at the apex of a pyramid of semi-professional and amateur leagues. There are 92 professional teams and innumerable semi-pro and amateur sides. The four professional leagues comprise the Premier League (20 teams), the Championship, League One and League Two (24 teaqms each). Below League Two, the Conference league provides a stepping-stone for semi-pro sides to gain promotion to the professional leagues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Premier League teams==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Arsenal FC''' is based in north [[London]]. The team is managed by [[Arsene Wenger]]. Finishing fourth in the [[English Premier League]] in the 2006/7 season, the team features major international stars of football. Former star [[Thierry Henry]] has recently left the team after eight years of huge success, departing to [[Barcelona]] in the summer of 2007. In 2006 the team moved from their old stadium, ''Arsenal Stadium'', located in, and more commonly known as ''Highbury''. The team's new stadium is named after the [[Dubai]] airline and sponsor, [[Emirates Airlines|Emirates]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aston Villa FC''' is based in [[Aston]], [[Birmingham]], in the English [[Midlands]].   Currently coached by Martin O'Neill, a former player for [[Northern Ireland]], [[Nottingham Forest]], [[Norwich City]] and [[Manchester City F.C.|Manchester City]].They finished the 2006/7 season in 11th position in the [[English Premier League]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Blackburn Rovers FC''' is an [[England|English]] [[football]] team that play in the [[English Premier League|Premiership]] . The club hails from the town of [[Blackburn]] in [[Lancashire]]. Their home stadium is Ewood Park.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chelsea FC''' play at Stamford Bridge, in west [[London]]. The club is owned by [[Russia]]n billionaire [[Roman Abramovich]] was managed by [[Avram Grant]] for most of the 2007-08 season. In 2007-08 the side finished second in the Premier League.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Everton FC''' is based in [[Liverpool]]. Founded in 1878 as a church sports side they were became of the sixteen founder members of the [[Football League]] in 1888.  However, owing to a rent dispute in 1892 they left their home ground of [[Anfield]] and moved to a new site at [[Goodison Park]], where they have played ever since.  There are plans under discussion to move outside the city of Liverpool and establish a new ground over a Tesco supermarket in nearby Knowsley. The club's nickname is ''The Toffees''; although there are several hypotheses about how the name arose it is likely that it derives from the black and white striped candy known as an ''Everton Mint''. Everton's most deadly rivals are [[Liverpool F.C.|Liverpool]] who were formed in 1892 to utilise the abandoned Anfield ground. Despite Everton's successes over the years they have been overshadowed by their illustrious neighbours who hold the records for the most top flight championships as well as European trophies won in the English game. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fulham FC''' is based in the [[London]] Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. Their nickname is The Cottagers, after their home ground of Craven Cottage alongside the [[River Thames]], which can usually be seen during the Oxford and Cambridge boat-race. The club was founded in 1879 and are the oldest professional soccer team in London. The club strip comprises white shirts and socks with black shorts. Despite their long history they have never won any major honors. The club is currently owned by the Egyptian millionaire and owner of Harrods, Mohamed Al-Fayed who took control in 1997. &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.fulhamfc.com Official site] &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.premierleague.com/page/fulham Premier League - Fulham]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hull City FC''', based in the east-coast port city of [[Hull]], were promoted to the Premier League in 2008. This will be the first time that Hull has been represented in the top tier of English football.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Liverpool FC''' was founded in 1892. It is based in Anfield stadium, although is expected to relocate to Stanley Park in 2011. The club has become the most successful club in English league history, winning eighteen domestic championships as well as five European championships. The current manager is Rafael Benitez.&lt;br /&gt;
The Club's most bitter rivalries with Everton, Manchester United and Chelsea. &lt;br /&gt;
The club was founded after a dispute between the owner, John Houlding, of Anfield and Everton FC, whomb rented it. After the Evertonians he began fielding a team of his own. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manchester City FC''' is the smaller of two [[English Premier League]] teams in the city of [[Manchester]].   Usually lying lower in the Premier League than their [[Derby|derby]] rivals, [[Manchester United]], City is managed by Mark Hughes. The team plays at the City of Manchester Stadium, built as the main stadium for the 2002 [[Commonwealth Games]]. The stadium will hosted the [[UEFA Cup]] Final 2008. Currently, the club is owned by the former Prime Minister of [[Thailand]], [[Thaksin Shinawatra]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manchester United FC''' Manchester United play in red shirts, white shorts and black socks.  They were the first English club to win the European Championship, in 1968, winning again in 1968 and 2008. The club joined the Football League in 1892 under the name Newton Heath.  Their official nickname is the &amp;quot;Red Devils&amp;quot; and the club badge features a small black devil holding a trident.  They are known to their fans either as Man U, Man United or just United. In 2005 the club was taken over by the [[America|American]] billionaire, Malcolm Glazer.  After two seasons with little success by their standards they won the Barclays Premier League again in 2007 and 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
The club is noted for the exeptionally cosmopolitan nature of it's support, regulary drawing large numbers of fans from all over the the [[United Kingdom]] and the [[Republic of Ireland]]. As a result it is consistently the most supported team in England.&lt;br /&gt;
The Club maintains bitter rivalries with Manchester City, Liverpool Leeds United and Arsenal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Middlesbrough FC''' ('Boro') is based in [[Middlesbrough]], in north-east [[England]]. The side was founded in 1876 by members of Middlesbrough [[Cricket]] Club&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/HistoryDetail/0,,1~51936,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Between 1903 and 1995 its home ground was Ayresome Park but in 1995 it moved to the Riverside Stadium. Middlesbrough were winners of the League Cup in 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Newcastle United FC''' , founded in 1892 by the merger of Newcastle West End and Newcastle East End, plays at St James' Park in [[Newcastle upon Tyne]].  Their club colors are black and white stripes with black shorts. The current manager of Newcastle United is [[Kevin Keegan]]. Newcastle United are nicknamed 'the Magpies', or, more simply, 'Toon' (the local pronunciation of 'town'); its fans are the 'Toon Army'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Portsmouth FC''' is based in [[Portsmouth]], on the southern coast of [[England]]. Known colloquially as 'Pompey', the club is owned by [[Alexandre Guydamak]] and managed by [[Harry Redknapp]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Stoke City FC''', based in the Midlands city of [[Stoke on Trent]], were newly promoted to the Premier League in 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Sunderland AFC''' are based in the northeastern city of Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, where they play in the Stadium of Light.  The club's nickname is The Black Cats, or the Mackems, and the club's crest depicts two black lions support a heraldic shield. The club strip comprises red and white striped shirts with black shorts and socks. The club was founded in [[1879]] and joined the Football League in 1890 (replacing Stoke City).  They remained remaining continuously in the top division until 1958. Since then they have been promoted to and relegated from the the top flight several times and are one of the 2007-8 season's Premier League new boys. Sunderland were successful in their early years, being League Champions five times between 1892 and 1913, with the addition of a sixth title in 1936. They won the [[FA Cup]] in 1937 and then again in 1973, which has been their only notable honor since [[World War II]]. The club is currently managed by Roy Keane.  [http://www.safc.com Official site] [http://www.premierleague.com/page/sunderland Premier League - Sunderland]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tottenham Hotspur FC''' ('Spurs' to their supporters) are a north London team, [[Arsenal F.C.|Arsenal]]'s long-standing rival.  They are based at White Hart Lane Stadium.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''West Bromwich Albion FC''', known as 'The Baggies', play at The Hawthorns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''West Ham United FC'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.whufc.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ('The Hammers', colloquially) are a [[London]] team, managed by [[Alan Curbishly]], and with their home ground in [[Upton Park]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Wigan Athletic FC''' is based in the northwestern town of Wigan, Lancashire (now part of [[Greater Manchester]]). The club's nickname is ''The Latics''. The club was founded in 1932 after several unsuccessful attempts to run a soccer club in a town where Rugby League is the most popular sport. After playing in the minor leagues for many years, Wigan gained entry to the old Fourth Division of the Football League in 1978 and promoted to the Third Division in 1982. In 1993 they were relegated to the lower league and were bought in 1995 by David Whelan, an ambitious local millionaire who had made his fortune selling sportswear. Two years later, in 1997, they were promoted back to third-tier football and within six years had secured a further step up the second tier. It took only a further two years for them to complete a remarkable progression from fourth-tier to top-tier, when they were promoted to the Premier League in 2005. The club play at the JJB Stadium which they share with Rugby League club Wigan Warriors (also owned by Devid Whelan).  The stadium was built in 1999 and named after Whelan's sportswear chain ''JJB Sports''. The club continues to struggle for support and its highest ever home attendance is 25,000 for visitors [[Liverpool F.C.|Liverpool]] in February 2006. After raising ticket prices in 2006 Wigan had to cut them in response to falling attendances and have kept them low at a time when almost all other Premier League clubs were making significant increases. After a poor 2006-7 season in which they just managed to avoid relegation, their manager Paul Jewell resigned and was replaced by Chris Hutchings. Hutchings was sacked after a poor start to the 2007-8 season. [http://www.wiganlatics.co.uk Official site] [http://www.premierleague.com/page/wigan-athletic Premier League - Wigan Athletic]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Championship teams==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Barnsley FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Birmingham City FC''' was founded in 1875 as Small Heath Alliance, they became Small Heath in 1888 and later Birmingham FC in 1905. They finally adopted the moniker Birmingham City FC in 1943. The club's home ground has been St. Andrew's since 1906. Although being the second largest city in England (after [[London]]) Birmingham City Football Club have known little success in the major competitions and have lived in the shadow of their neighbours and fierce rivals Aston Villa. The club's nickname is &amp;quot;The Blues&amp;quot; on account of the color of their team strip. Birmingham City was relegated from the Premier League to the Championship mat the end of the 2007-08 season.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Blackpool FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bristol City FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Burnley FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Cardiff City FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Charlton Athletic FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Coventry City FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Derby County FC'''  Their nickname is ''The Rams'', after the symbol for the county of [[Derbyshire]] and also the club. Their current home ground is Pride Park, but they previously played at the Baseball Ground. Derby County was relegated from the Premier League at the end of the 2007-08 season. [http://www.dcfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Home/ Official site]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doncaster Rovers FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ipswich Town FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Norwich City FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nottingham Forest FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Plymouth Argyle FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Preston North End FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Queens Park Rangers FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Reading FC''' are an [[England|English]] [[soccer|football]]  [[club]] based in the southern town of [[Reading]], [[Berkshire]]. The club's nickname since 1970 is The Royals (Berkshire is known as the Royal County); formerly they were known as The Biscuitmen after the Huntley &amp;amp; Palmers [[cookie|biscuit]] factory. The club strip comprises royal-blue and white hooped shirts with royal-blue shorts and socks. The club was founded on [[Christmas]] Day 1871 and in 1920 joined the Third Division of the original Football League. Apart from brief excursions to the second and fourth tiers, Reading were generally a third-tier team until 2002 when the made the longer term move to second level competition.  They were promoted to the Premier League in 2006 after running away with The Championship, but relegated to the Championship at the end of the 2007-08 season. The club play at the Madejski Stadium, built in 1998 and named after their multi-millionaire owner John Madejski who bought the club in 1990. Reading's worst ever defeat was by Preston North End in 1894, when they lost 18-0. Reading have registered their fans as an official (unpaid) member of their team squad, in recognition of the effect their support has for the team, and given the Number 13. The club is currently managed by Steve Coppell.  [http://www.readingfc.co.uk Official site] [http://www.premierleague.com/page/reading Premier League - Reading]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Sheffield United FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Sheffield Wednesday FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Southampton FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Swansea City AFC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Watford FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Wolverhampton Wanderers FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==League One teams==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Brighton &amp;amp; Hove Albion FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bristol Rovers FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Carlisle United FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Cheltenham Town FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Colchester United FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Crewe Alexandra FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hartlepool United FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hereford United FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Huddersfield Town FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Leeds United FC''', based in the northern city of [[Leeds]], play at Elland Road stadium. Their traditional strip is white shirts and shorts. Leeds has long been one of the strongest sides in England, but financial mismanagement of the club in the early years of this decade, reflected in sporting performance, has brought it to its current lowly situation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Leicester City FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Leyton Orient FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Millwall FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''MK Dons FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Northampton Town FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Oldham Athletic FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Peterborough United FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Scun&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;thorpe United FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Southend United FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Stockport County FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Swindon Town FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tranmere Rovers FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Walsall FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Yeovil Town FC'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==League Two teams==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further information==&lt;br /&gt;
*The Football League: http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/Home/0,,10794,00.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soccer]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&amp;diff=486756</id>
		<title>Charles Darwin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&amp;diff=486756"/>
		<updated>2008-07-03T20:43:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Correct typos.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:darwin.jpg|thumb|150px|right|Charles Darwin]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Charles Darwin''' (12 February 1809 - 19 April 1883) was a famous naturalist born in England. Charles Darwin is best known for the [[evolution|theory of evolution]] by [[Natural selection|natural selection]].  The concept is that organisms are modified over vast amounts of time by naturally occurring processes, originating from common ancestors that lived tens of millions of years ago. Outside the area of evolutionary theory in particular, Charles Darwin was regarded as an expert on barnacles, as well as being credited with discovering how coral [[atoll]]s were formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General Biography of Charles Darwin==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin was born in [[Shrewsbury]], [[England]] in 1809 to his parents Dr. Robert Darwin and Susannah Wedgewood. Darwin's mother was a religious woman but his father was, for the most part, a weak deist. Despite his lack of theistic religious belief, the Darwin's father allowed Charles to be baptized into the Anglican Church and encouraged him to become a clergyman. Darwin's mother died in 1817. In 1825 Charles Darwin went on to study medicine at the University of Edinburgh. There, he became horrified with the brutality of surgery before anesthesia was invented and quit his medical studies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1831 Charles Darwin graduated from Christ's College at Cambridge with a BA degree in the classics and theology. On December 27 of the same year Charles Darwin departed on the ''HMS Beagle'' for a five year voyage of exploration. The ''Beagle'' returned to English shores on October 2 1836. In 1837, Charles Darwin drew his now famous depiction of [[common ancestry]] in the form of a branching tree.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles Darwin, Transmutation Notebook B 1837:36&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The following year he discovered the concept of ''[[natural selection]].'' Darwin insists that naturally occurring phenomena and factors working together in blind tandem have produced nature and eventually mankind. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Charles Darwin originally based the idea of human evolution on a racist assumption&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Milton, Richard ''Shattering the Myths of Darwinism'' 1997:186,287 says &amp;quot;Darwin [was] openly racist&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [after God was rejected as Creator], made in the late 1830s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barlow, Nora (editor) ''The Autobiography of Charles Darwin'' 1958:130&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, that Fuegians (natives of Tierra del Fuego) resembled primates that he had observed in the London zoo.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Larson, Edward J. ''Evolution: The Remarkable History Of A Scientific Theory'' 2004:66,67&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In 1842 he wrote out a ''sketch'' of his theory but did not publish it. Again, in 1844 Charles Darwin produced what is known today as an ''essay'' of the same theory more developed but he still chose not to publish. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, in 1859, Charles Darwin published his famous theory about how the species may have been produced without any aid from a Divine Creator. He titled his book ''On [[The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection]], or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life''. In 1871, well after his theory enjoyed widespread success, Darwin published his ideas on human evolution in a two-volume book titled ''[[The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex]].''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious Views of Charles Darwin==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Do not change this heading without also changing the link to it in [[Creationism]] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CharlesDarwin.jpg|thumb|150px|left|Charles Darwin in 1880 at the age of 71.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin likely abandoned Christianity as a student when he disappointed his father by refusing to become a minister.  In his autobiography Charles Darwin wrote about the diminishment of his religious faith and Darwin stated that he was an [[agnostic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.update.uu.se/~fbendz/library/cd_relig.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  However, Darwin was being [[deceit|deceitful]] as he stated in his private notebooks that he was a [[materialism|materialist]], which is a type of [[atheism|atheist]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1877&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barrett, Paul H. ''Darwin on Man'' 1974:276&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''American Scientist''  May 1977:323&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Darwin wrote the following: &amp;quot;The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble to us; and I for one must be content to remain an Agnostic.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.update.uu.se/~fbendz/library/cd_relig.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the 1996 ''British Journal for the Philosophy of Science'' Kim Sterelny wrote in a book review the following: &amp;quot;I have no doubt that Darwin was a [[Materialism|materialist]] and a mechanist...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jstor.org/view/00070882/ap020188/02a00130/1?frame=noframe&amp;amp;userID=80cdbf39@buffalo.edu/01cce4405c00501c2c38a&amp;amp;dpi=3&amp;amp;config=jstor British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Volume 47, 1996, page 641&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Creation Ministries International]] states the following regarding why it is maintained that Charles Darwin was privately a materialist:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|[[Ernst Mayr]]’s recent book on Darwin, One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Evolutionary Thought, Harvard, 1991, also acknowledges that Darwin’s references to purpose were to appease both the public and his wife. His early, private notebooks show his materialism well established. For instance, in one of them he addresses himself as, ‘O, you materialist!’ and says, ‘Why is thought, being a secretion of [[brain]], more wonderful than [[gravity]] as a property of matter?’ He clearly already believed that the idea of a separate realm of the spirit was nonsense, as is further shown when he warns himself not to reveal his beliefs, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
‘to avoid saying how far I believe in materialism, say only that emotions, instincts, degrees of talent which are hereditary are so because brain of child resembles parent stock.’&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1877&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scholars refer to the private notebook in which Charles Darwin stated he was a materialist as the &amp;quot;M&amp;quot; notebook of 1838.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barrett, Paul H. ''Darwin on Man'' 1974:276&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Ernst Mayr]] wrote that &amp;quot;It is apparent that Darwin lost his faith in the years 1836-39, much of it clearly prior to the reading of [[Robert Malthus|Malthus]]. In order not to hurt the feelings of his friends and of his wife, Darwin often used deistic language in his publications, but much in his Notebooks indicates that by this time he had become a 'materialist' (more or less = atheist)&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''American Scientist''  May 1977:323&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Charles Darwin the &amp;quot;manifestly false history of the world&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ibid. Barlow 1958:85.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as recorded in the Old Testament and New Testament miracles led him to reject Biblical veracity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ibid. Barlow 1958:85-87.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Eminent Darwin biographer, Professor Janet Browne, sums up Darwin's views concerning religion: Darwin &amp;quot;mapped out a comparative evolution of the religious sense, proposing that religious belief was ultimately nothing more than a primitive urge to bestow a cause on otherwise inexplicable natural events...In short, he made no secret of his view that he did not believe religion to have any rational foundation at all&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Browne, Janet  ''Charles Darwin The Power of Place'' 2002:341&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. When he died in 1882 at the age of seventy-three, Darwin was buried at Westminster Abbey next to Sir [[Isaac Newton]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the [[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]] states the following regarding Charles Darwin:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In 1885, the Duke of Argyll recounted a conversation he had had with Charles Darwin the year before Darwin's death: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the course of that conversation I said to Mr. Darwin, with reference to some of his own remarkable works on the Fertilisation of [[Orchid]]s, and upon The [[Earthworm]]s, and various other observations he made of the wonderful contrivances for certain purposes in nature—I said it was impossible to look at these without seeing that they were the effect and the expression of Mind. I shall never forget Mr. Darwin's answer. He looked at me very hard and said, “Well, that often comes over me with overwhelming force; but at other times,” and he shook his head vaguely, adding, “it seems to go away.”(Argyll 1885, 244] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleological-arguments/notes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There exists in hostile Darwin literature a story about a Christian called Lady Hope who visited and spoke with a dying Charles Darwin.  This appears to be merely a legend, and there is no evidence that Lady Hope ever converted or even visited Darwin on his deathbed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.carm.org/evo_questions/deathbed.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Darwin's Sickness and Controversy Regarding His Sickness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more on this topic see: [[Darwin's Sickness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For most of his adult life Charles Darwin suffered from very poor health.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 1992 ''New Encyclopaedia Britannica '' stated that Darwin's illness was [[psychogenic]] in origin (A psychogenic illness is one that originates in the mind or in mental condition). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A 1997 article in the [[Journal of the American Medical Association]] entitled &amp;quot;Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder&amp;quot; states that the &amp;quot;variable intensity of symptoms and chronic, prolonged course without physical deterioration also indicate that his illness was [[Psychiatry|psychiatric]].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder''&amp;quot; by Thomas J. Barloon, MD and Russel Noyes, Jr., January 8, 1997 [[Journal of the American Medical Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In regards to illness associated with evolutionary ideas a journal article in the [[American Journal of Medicine]] states that Darwin suffered from &amp;quot;[[psychoneurosis]] provoked and exaggerated by his [[theory of evolution|evolutionary]] ideas&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Illness of Charles Darwin&amp;quot;, William B. Bean, September 1978, American Journal of Medicine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The American Journal of Medicine article also stated that his Darwin's wife, Emma, greatly disapproved of his evolutionist ideas and &amp;quot;This, facsimile of public reaction, must have kept lively his anxiety and torment&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Illness of Charles Darwin&amp;quot;, William B. Bean, September 1978, American Journal of Medicine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to the abstract for a 1997 journal article in the [[Notes and Records of the Royal Society]] the psychogenic hypothesis for the origin of Darwin's illness &amp;quot;holds the field&amp;quot; but the article questions the validity of this diagnoses and mentions the work of [[Ralph Colp Jr.]] MD, a physician and psychiatrist (For details see: [[Darwin's Sickness]]). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/c5la8dhfh8v7tbx8/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/20hist06.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given Darwin's likely psychogenic or [[psychobiological]] illness various [[Creationism|creationists]] have stated that Darwin's illness was the result of guilt and/or fear. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/20hist06.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism of the Work of Charles Darwin by Cliff Lillo==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cliff Lillo wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Darwin was wrong when he says that science has not yet proved [[Lamarck]] in error about [[spontaneous generation]], wrong when he says that changes in habit can be [[inherited]], and wrong when he says that use or disuse of an organ can be passed along from parent to child, etc. [http://www.creationinthecrossfire.com/Articles/OriginofSpecies.html]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reaction of Charles Darwin to Criticism of His Work ==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin closely followed the general public's reaction to his evolutionary ideas.  In 2002, [[Richard Milner]] wrote an article entitled ''Putting Darwin in his Place'' and stated that Darwin ''&amp;quot;clipped, catalogued and indexed hundreds of offprints, about 350 reviews and 1,600 articles, as well as satires, parodies and Punch caricatures, with which he filled hefty scrapbooks...&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Criticisms of his work troubled Darwin.  Milner wrote that after [[Charles Lyell]] published a weak endorsement of Darwin's work in Lyell's Antiquity of Man, &amp;quot;''Darwin's disappointment brought on 10 days of vomiting, faintness and stomach distress''&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Milner states when anatomist St. [[George Mivart]] made a negative review of Darwin's work The Descent of Man, it &amp;quot;triggered two months of &amp;quot;giddiness&amp;quot; and inability to work...&amp;quot; ''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Life ==&lt;br /&gt;
Author Peter Brent wrote of Darwin's relationship with his wife Emma and stated that &amp;quot;Their ties to each other were linked to childhood and the very beginnings of memory. They had a common history, a joint tradition. It is hard to think their relationship a passionate one, but it was happy, and the happiness had deep roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peter Brent, &amp;quot;Darwin: A Man of Enlarged Curiosity&amp;quot;, page 316&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Charles Darwin displayed a dependency on his wife that was childlike.  Darwin wrote a letter to his wife in 1848 that said, &amp;quot;My dearest old Mammy ... Without you, when sick I feel most desolate .. Oh Mammy I do long to be with you and under your protection for then I feel safe.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar9.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Peter Brent states that it is hard to imagine that the letter was from thirty-nine year old man writing to his wife rather than a young child writing to its mother.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar9.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In their article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, entitled Charles Darwin and Panic stated that Darwin felt &amp;quot;nervousness when Emma leaves me&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder''&amp;quot; by Thomas J. Barloon, MD and Russel Noyes, Jr., January 8, 1997 Journal of the American Medical Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Darwin had ten children with his wife Emma. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Browne_EmmaDiaries.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Darwin's Racism==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin wrote in his work  ''[[The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex]]'' the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|At some future period not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes...will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest Allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as the baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;DoM6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext00/dscmn10.txt The Descent of Man], chapter VI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Darwin's Belief in Male Superiority==&lt;br /&gt;
In Darwin's work ''[[The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex]]'' he wrote the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|... a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than can women—whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. If two lists were made of the most eminent men and women in poetry, painting, sculpture, music (inclusive of both composition and performance), history, science, and philosophy, with half-a-dozen names under each subject, the two lists would not bear comparison. We may also infer, from the law of the deviation from averages, so well illustrated by Mr. Galton, in his work on “Hereditary Genius” that ... the average of mental power in man must be above that of women.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2007/08/24/feedback-female-inferiority&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Charles Darwin and the Cult of Personality==&lt;br /&gt;
There is a cult of personality and type of religiousity currently surrounding Charles Darwin.  [[Stephen Jay Gould]] wrote the following in 1978: &amp;quot;&amp;quot;... all theories [of natural selection] cite God in their support, and ... Darwin comes close to this status among evolutionary biologists ...&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In 2002, Michael White similarly wrote: &amp;quot;Of course today, for biologists, Darwin is second only to God, and for many he may rank still higher.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Galton Darwin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/author/charles-darwin/ What Liberals Say - Charles Darwin], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Darwin, Charles}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Womb&amp;diff=473555</id>
		<title>Womb</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Womb&amp;diff=473555"/>
		<updated>2008-06-13T22:37:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Merge suggestion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{merge|Uterus}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''womb''' is the organ of the [[female]] body in which a child is borne during [[pregnancy]]. In the prayer [[Hail Mary]], Jesus is described as 'the fruit of thy womb'.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Salford&amp;diff=473547</id>
		<title>Salford</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Salford&amp;diff=473547"/>
		<updated>2008-06-13T22:26:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Links&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Salford''' is a city in [[Greater Manchester]], [[England]], approximately three miles north-west of [[Manchester]] city centre. Until 1974 it was in the county of [[Lancashire]]. It lies to the west of the the River Irwell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically the textile industry was important to the city’s economy, based around the [[Manchester Ship Canal]]. The Salford Quays area has undergone major regeneration including new housing and businesses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Manchester Metrolink tram system serves Salford Quays. The city’s mainline railway stations are Salford Central and Salford Crescent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Salford City Reds]] are an English [[rugby league]] club. Salford City Football Club play regional football ([[soccer]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its population is 72,750 (2001).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Cities and Towns]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Manchester_Ship_Canal&amp;diff=473546</id>
		<title>Manchester Ship Canal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Manchester_Ship_Canal&amp;diff=473546"/>
		<updated>2008-06-13T22:25:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: New page: The '''Manchester Ship Canal''' was opened in 1894. It consists of two canalized rivers, the Mersey and the Irwell. Smaller seagoing vessels are able to access Salford Quays in [[Great...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Manchester Ship Canal''' was opened in 1894. It consists of two canalized rivers, the Mersey and the Irwell. Smaller seagoing vessels are able to access [[Salford]] Quays in [[Greater Manchester]], approximately thirty-six miles inland. Access is available further inland to smaller vessels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically the canal was a major freight route, especially for the textile industry around Greater Manchester. Modern ocean-going vessels are too large to use the canal.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DeanS&amp;diff=469142</id>
		<title>User talk:DeanS</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DeanS&amp;diff=469142"/>
		<updated>2008-06-08T18:16:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''IF YOU NEED IMMEDIATE HELP AND I AM NOT HERE PLEASE GO HERE FOR A LIST OF Administrators/Sysops''': [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Listusers%26group%3Dsysop Sysop list] &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=center border=3 cellspacing=0 style=&amp;quot;border-width: 5px; border-color: #f0c0c0; background: #e0e0e1; margin: 2em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! width=40% style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | &amp;lt;font color=#302020&amp;gt;No Ping-ponging Conversations!&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | &amp;lt;font color=#202020&amp;gt;Archive Policy&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| width=40% style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | &amp;lt;font color=#202020&amp;gt;Conversations are easier to read if they stay on one page. If I leave a message on your talk page, please respond there; I'm watching it. If you start a conversation here, I'll reply here, so please watch this page.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | &amp;lt;font color=#202020&amp;gt;Conversations which have not had additions in 14 days ''may'' be archived. Or just deleted and recreation prohibited. My &amp;quot;castle&amp;quot;, my rules.   A 'conversation' is a group of messages delimited by a heading.  Hopefully this will allow conversations to stay in one place long enough for people who are interested to read the whole thing, without leading to an overly long page. Make sure you sign your posts, please.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User talk:Crocoite/Archive1|Archive1]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[User talk:Crocoite/Archive2|Archive2]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[User talk:Crocoite/Archive3|Archive3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Errors ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do I point out grammatical errors or typos? For instance, in the first paragraph of the article on Homosexuality, there is a missing word. I really like the concept of Conservapedia, but I can't stand mistakes in grammar. Call me fickle, but that kind of thing really indicates an amateurish undertaking.  {{unsigned|Jimtitcomb}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Mention the errors on the Homosexuality talk page. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;formerly Crocoite&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 17:58, 30 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hollywood Values==&lt;br /&gt;
Could you check out JBrooks' deletions from this and maybe consider reversions? For a new editor, (s)he's pretty pushy. Thanks, [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 18:40, 4 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 18:46, 4 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==NrRaAaggH!==&lt;br /&gt;
I was just about to block WhiteCubord! I never block anyone: there's an army of sysops who always beat me to it! It's not fair. Oh well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BTW, do you know why TerryH blocked Nigga? He made no contributions, was it his name? --[[User:StevenM|Ṣ₮ёVeN]] 10:28, 6 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: That it was his name seems likely, but if he created new articles which were then deleted, they don't show up in his contribution history.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:19, 6 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ahhh. So I learn something new everyday....--[[User:StevenM|Ṣ₮ёVeN]] 21:06, 6 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I would never hesitate to block someone with that name. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:17, 6 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I since happened to notice that there was at least one article that he created that was subsequently deleted.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:17, 7 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mass account creation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am contacting you because I can see that you're active now. A very large number of accounts have been created between 1405 and 1407 today as well as quite a few between 1135 and 1137. I suggest a checkuser investigation to see if it's mass sockpuppetry. I don't know Conservapedia well enough to know the right place to raise this concern.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Barclay|Barclay]] 14:16, 8 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Salford&amp;diff=463624</id>
		<title>Salford</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Salford&amp;diff=463624"/>
		<updated>2008-05-31T11:05:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Correct own error.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Salford''' is a city in [[Greater Manchester]], [[England]], approximately three miles north-west of [[Manchester]] city centre. Until 1974 it was in the county of [[Lancashire]]. It lies to the west of the the River Irwell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically the textile industry was important to the city’s economy, based around the Manchester Ship Canal. The Salford Quays area has undergone major regeneration including new housing and businesses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Manchester Metrolink tram system serves Salford Quays. The city’s mainline railway stations are Salford Central and Salford Crescent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Salford City Reds]] are an English rugby league club. Salford City Football Club play regional football ([[soccer]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its population is 72,750 (2001).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Cities and Towns]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Salford&amp;diff=458485</id>
		<title>Salford</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Salford&amp;diff=458485"/>
		<updated>2008-05-22T17:20:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: New page: '''Salford''' is a city in Greater Manchester, England, approximately three miles north-west of Manchester city centre. Until 1974 it was in the county of Lancashire. It li...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Salford''' is a city in [[Greater Manchester]], [[England]], approximately three miles north-west of [[Manchester]] city centre. Until 1974 it was in the county of [[Lancashire]]. It lies to the west of the the River Irwell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically the textile industry was important to the city’s economy, based around the Manchester Ship Canal. The Salford Quays area has undergone major regeneration including new housing and businesses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Manchester Metrolink tram system serves Salford Quays. The city’s mainline railway stations are Salford Central and Salford Crescent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Salford City Reds]] are an English rugby league. Salford City Football Club play regional football ([[soccer]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its population is 72,750 (2001).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Cities and Towns]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Faith&amp;diff=453127</id>
		<title>Faith</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Faith&amp;diff=453127"/>
		<updated>2008-05-14T21:10:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Undo revision 453123 by Special:Contributions/Lolcats (User talk:Lolcats). Revert blanking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Faith''' is a essential concept in [[Christianity]], referring to a confidence or trust in a greater good as provided by the [[Lord]].  A classic statement of faith in the [[Bible]] was by the [[Roman Empire|Roman]] centurion of [http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew%208:5-10;&amp;amp;version=49; Matthew 8:5-10], who expressed his confidence that [[Jesus]] could cure his servant from a distance without even seeing him.  [[Jesus]] repeatedly emphasized the importance and value of faith to his disciples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In Biblical [[Judaism]], faith is specifically understood as the continued obedience of the Jews to the commandments of [[God]] ([[Jehovah]]) found and repeatedly renewed in his [[Covenant]]s. Thus, faith is tied to the context of God's [[Covenant]] with his chosen people, [[Israel]]. In practice, this means that Jews are expected to be faithful to God by following the 613 ''Mitzvoth'', and honoring the holidays of the Jewish calendar, among other practices. [http://www.encyclopediaproject.net/wiki/Faith#Faith_in_Christianity]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faith embodies more than belief in two significant respects.  First, faith implies a causal role by the believer in an outcome, as in [[Peter]]'s walking on water based on his faith or in overcoming a personal fear.  Second, faith implies advancement or accomplishment rather than wrongdoing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faith plays a central role in overcoming [[addiction]].  Virtually everyone is plagued by one or more addictions, and faith enables overcoming those weaknesses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faith is also helpful in overcoming fear, such as fear of public speaking,  appearing on [[television]], or standing up to a [[bully]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opposites of faith include fear, anxiety, depression and lack of confidence.  A lack of faith can be very harmful, leading to self-destructive behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faith is expressed in [[Greek]] using the term ''pistis'', and in [[Latin]] using the term ''fides''.  Faith is mentioned in 229 verses in the [[New Testament]] ([[KJV]]), but only twice in the much larger [[Old Testament]] ([[KJV]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.crosswalk.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In attempt to convert [[Jews]] to [[Christianity]], [[Paul]] described [[Abraham]]'s willingness to sacrifice his beloved son [[Isaac]] to [[God]] as an act of [[faith]], though the [[Old Testament]] did not describe it with that term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faith is strengthened by prayer ([http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=jude%2020;&amp;amp;version=9; Jude 20]). For those who strengthen their faith, [[Jesus]] promised &amp;quot;I tell you the truth, anyone who has faith in me will do what I have been doing. He will do even greater things than these, because I am going to the Father.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John 14:12 (NIV).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Biblical examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps the greatest description of faith is that of the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], chapter 11. It states: &amp;quot;Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hebrews 11:1 (NIV).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Paul]] indicated that faith itself is a gift of the [[Holy Spirit]].  1 Corinthians 12:8-9 &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit; to another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As discussed above, a potential reference to faith is [[Genesis]] 22 where [[God]] tested [[Abraham]] by commanding him to sacrifice his only son [[Isaac]]. As Abraham prepared to do what God commanded -he was stopped. &lt;br /&gt;
Genesis 22:12&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Do not lay a hand on the boy,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Martin Luther on Faith==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Luther in his Table Talk papers writes this thought provoking and rather difficult passage on faith:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This is the acme of faith, to believe that God, who saves so few and condemns so many, is merciful; that he is just who, at his own pleasure, has made us necessarily doomed to damnation, so that he seems to delight in the torture of the wretched and is more deserving of hate than of love.  If by any effort of reason I could conceive how God, who shows so much anger and harshness, could be merciful and just, there would be no need of faith.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Definitions and Religions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outside of [[Christianity]], faith is misused as a synonym for &amp;quot;belief&amp;quot;. The [[Merriam-Webster]] dictionary, for example, includes this definition of faith:  &amp;quot;a system of religious beliefs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/faith&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, faith often refers to a &amp;quot;firm belief in something for which there is no proof&amp;quot; or evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[Koran]], the concept of submission to [[Allah]] is mentioned 11 times, while the concept of faith in Allah is mentioned only once.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Etymologically, the word 'faith' is closely linked to the concept of &amp;quot;fidelity,&amp;quot; which emphasizes commitment to something or someone, specifically [[Christ]]. Thus, faith is often understood to mean 'loyalty' to a particular view of [[divinity]]. Yet, faith can also be envisioned more broadly as a trust in [[providence]], as it entails an active role for the believer himself for advancing good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The literary critic Harold Bloom distinguishes Christianity from the other two dominant monotheistic religions in his book Agon by contrasting them with Gnosticism:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Gnosticism polemically is decidedly not a faith, whether in the Christian sense, pisits, a believing that something was, is, and will be so; or in the Hebraic sense, emunah, a trusting in the Covenant.  If religion is a binding, then Gnosticism is an unbinding, but not for the sake of things or persons merely as they are.  Gnostic freedom is a freedom for knowledge, knowledge of what in the self, not in the psyche or soul, is Godlike, and knowledge of God beyond the cosmos.  But also it is a freedom to be known, to be known by God, by what is alien to everything created, by what is alien to and beyond the stars and the cosmic system and our earth.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faith is emphasized in Christianity but is unrecognized by the worldview of [[Philosophical Skepticism|philosophical skepticism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:philosophy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Holding, James Patrick, [http://tektonics.org/whatis/whatfaith.html Fallacious Faith]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://jesuschrist.lds.org/SonOfGod/eng/finding-faith-in-christ/video/finding-faith-in-christ Finding Faith in Christ], video at ''JesusChrist.lds.org''&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Love&amp;diff=453124</id>
		<title>Love</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Love&amp;diff=453124"/>
		<updated>2008-05-14T21:09:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Undo revision 453121 by Special:Contributions/Lolcats (User talk:Lolcats). Revert blanking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Watteau Peaceful Love.jpg|right|300px|Watteau Peaceful Love]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Love''' is one of the basic emotions, decribed as an extreme affection for a person, an object, an idea, a country, a friend or a family member. Love is used to describe affection for many different things, but can sometimes be misinterpreted for [[Lust]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many faiths, such as Christianity, Catholicism, Buddhism, etc., believe [[love]] to be a positive trait, and the followers of these religions are asked to practice love for others as a general principle for a good life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Five Grecian Forms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ancient Greeks identified four forms of positive love:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philos]] - the love of close friends or brothers. [[Aristotle]] identifies several types of philos &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Book VIII&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which can include utility as well as shared characteristics and values. The word is often attached to groups of people who share a love of a common pursuit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Storge]] - the love of [[family]]. This would include [[patriotism]] - the love of country or homeland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Eros]] - carnal or sexual love. This would include [[romantic love]] but would also include [[lust]]. [[Eros]] is intended by God, as laid down in the Bible, to be enjoyed between a married man and woman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Agape]] - love which seeks the highest good of others, not just friends, family or brothers, but including enemies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Matthew 5:44&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is considered by all major world religions to be the highest kind of love, although [[Buddhism]] would regard it as [[compassion]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fifth form of love is called [[Narcissism]], or self love. This word comes from the [[Greek myth]] of [[Narcissus]], who fell in love with his own reflection. Although [[Freud]] considered that everybody has some degree of narcissism, and that this is present in us from birth, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Freud, Sigmund, On Narcissism: An Introduction, 1914&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; if taken to extremes narcissism can be considered a [[personality disorder]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.halcyon.com/jmashmun/npd/dsm-iv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hatred]], considered the opposite of love&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:religion]][[category:culture]][[category:philosophy]][[category:sociology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]][[Category:Attributes of God]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Manchester&amp;diff=445576</id>
		<title>Manchester</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Manchester&amp;diff=445576"/>
		<updated>2008-05-03T14:14:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Links + UK spelling in UK article.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Manchester''' is a major industrial city in the North West of [[England]], in the metropolitan [[county]] of [[Greater Manchester]], and formerly a part of [[Lancashire]]. It is the third largest city in England after [[London]] and [[Birmingham]]. It was formerly an important inland port, served by the [[Manchester Ship Canal]] beside the [[River Mersey]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Originally a Roman military settlement named ''Mamcumium'', and later of a tenth century [[burh]] (Anglo-Saxon fortified place), Manchester was of only regional importance until the [[Industrial Revolution]], when it became a major centre of the [[cotton]] industry and renowned as a &amp;quot;shock city&amp;quot;, a place where new urban and social developments were undertaken. Manchester and its environs saw the first large-scale application of factory technology and organisation; Manchester was the first city to experience full-scale suburbanisation; it was (with Liverpool) the first city to have a fully locomotive-hauled public railway, in 1830. It also experienced in full measure the negative aspects of this headlong rush to modernise and urbanise in its terrible slums, described in a dramtic piece of reportage by [[Friedrich Engels]], ''The Condition of the Working Class in England'' (1844-45; first published in English 1892). In recent years the city centre has seen large scale renovation, including that of a quarter damaged by an [[IRA]] [[terrorist]] bomb in 1996. The city is home to the [[University of Manchester]] and [[Manchester Metropolitan University]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Culture ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Manchester has a number of major museums and is also home to the John Rylands Library, now part of the University of Manchester, which has in its collection the earliest fragment of the [[New Testament]] known to exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of significant bands have come from Manchester, including:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Hollies]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Freddie and the Dreamers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Buzzcocks]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Fall (band)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joy Division]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Smiths]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Happy Mondays]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Stone Roses]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oasis]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sport ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In 2002 Manchester hosted the [[Commonwealth Games]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is the home of two major football teams, [[Manchester United F.C.|Manchester United]] and [[Manchester City F.C.|Manchester City]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Lancashire County [[Cricket (game)|Cricket]] Club play many of their matches at Old Trafford, which has also been the venue of many test matches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Cities and Towns]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bolton,_England&amp;diff=445571</id>
		<title>Bolton, England</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bolton,_England&amp;diff=445571"/>
		<updated>2008-05-03T14:06:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: New page: '''Bolton''' is a town in Greater Manchester, England, approximately ten miles north-west of Manchester city centre. Until 1974 it was in the county of Lancashire. The Rive...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Bolton''' is a town in [[Greater Manchester]], [[England]], approximately ten miles north-west of [[Manchester]] city centre. Until 1974 it was in the county of [[Lancashire]]. The River Croal flows through the town.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bolton Railway Station is a served by long-distance trains passing through Manchester and various local services. The A666 road connects the town with the M60 and M61 motorways.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically [[cotton]]-spinning and the manufacture of textiles were important to the town’s economy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
British Aerospace have facilities in Lostock, near Bolton. Tourism, IT and general manufacturing are also significant employers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bolton Wanderers F.C.|Bolton Wanderers Football Club]] play in the English Premiership ([[soccer]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its population is 139,400 (2001).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Towns in Greater Manchester]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wales&amp;diff=438408</id>
		<title>Wales</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wales&amp;diff=438408"/>
		<updated>2008-04-23T22:55:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Correct spelling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Flag of Wales.png|thumb|The Welsh flag]]'''Wales''' is a principality which is a part of the [[United Kingdom]]. It occupies the peninsula of land between the [[Bristol Channel]] and the [[River Dee]], on the west side of southern [[Great Britain]]. [[Anglesey]], [[Holy Island]], and the bardic island of Bardsey are also part of Wales.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much of Wales is mountainous; the [[Cambrian Mountains]] run the length of the country, from [[Snowdon]]ia in the north. Several [[geological period]]s are named after the ancient Welsh tribes that lived in regions where strata characteristic of the period are to be found; the [[Ordovician]] (Ordovices), the [[Silurian]] (Silures), and the [[Cambrian]] period is named for Cambria, the [[Latin]] for Wales.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest city in Wales is [[Cardiff]], which was declared to be the capital city in 1955, against competition from [[Swansea]]. Other important locales include the ports of [[Holyhead]] and [[Milford Haven]]; the mining and industrial centres of Llanelli, Neath, Pontypridd, Merthyr Tydfil and [[Wrexham]]; the ecclesiastical cities of [[St. Asaph]] and [[St. Davids]]; the resorts of Pwllheli, [[Llandudno]], Colwyn Bay, Rhyl and Prestatyn; the university towns of Bangor and [[Aberystwyth]]; and the villages of [[Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch]] (the longest place name in Britain) and [[Llanddewi Brefi]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[English]] is universally spoken in Wales - however, the ancestral Celtic language of [[Welsh]] is still spoken as a first or second language by approximately a quarter of the population. The long-term decline in Welsh-speakers has stabilised since the early 1990s owing to the introduction of compulsory Welsh language classes in schools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The national emblems are the [[leek]] and the [[daffodil]]. The Welsh national day is March 1, [[Saint David]]'s day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wales emerged as a nation from the collapse of Romano-British Britannia following the invasions of the Angles, Saxons and Jutes from the fifth century AD onwards. What is now known as Wales was for a time known as 'North Wales', while [[Devon]] and [[Cornwall]] (in SW England) were 'West Wales' until their conquest. The Mercian king [[Offa]] (Mercia equates roughly to the English Midlands) created an substantial earthwork, [[Offa's Dyke]] running between the [[Irish Sea]] and the [[River Severn|Severn]] estuary in the later eighth century to separate his kingdom from Welsh lands. The dyke broadly marks the Anglo-Welsh boundary to this day. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norman Conquest]] of England following 1066 gave rise to Norman attempts to occupy Wales; by the thirteenth century much of eastern and southern Wales were under Norman control in autonomous 'Marcher Lordships' owing loyalty to the English crown. What was left of independent Wales was not a unitary nation, but comprised a number of separate, often warring, principalities, and only late on, under English pressure, did these unite to acknowledge one 'Prince of Wales'. These princes were provided by the most powerful of the Welsh states, Gwynedd, in the mountainous NW of the country. Most notable was [[Llewelyn the Great]] (1173-1240; who unified the country, and gave it a code of laws). His grandson, [[Llewelyn ap Gruffydd]], was unable to resist a powerful invasion mounted by the English king [[Edward I]], and his death in battle in 1282 marked the extinction of independent Wales.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of huge fortifications were built by Edward to pacify the country, notably that of [[Caernafon Castle]], and maintained by his successors.  These castles wer known as the ''Iron Ring''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major revolt against English rule was mounted in the early fifteenth century led by [[Owain Glyndwr]], a member of the prosperous Welsh gentry who became embittered against the local English magnates for reasons which are uncertain, but probably owe as much to personal disputes as national sentiment. Glyndwr's rebellion achieved astonishing success, for a while. Beginning on Good Friday 1401, the rebels came to control much of the countryside and many Welsh towns, even advancing to [[Worcester]] in England. Glyndwr, who had been proclaimed Prince of Wales, held two parliaments at Machynlleth in mid Wales, and allied himself with the Duke of Northumberland and the Earl of Mortimer in a plan to dismember the English kingdom once Henry IV had been conclusively defeated. He made an alliance with [[France]], and created two (short-lived) universities, one each in north and South Wales. However, by 1408 the tide had turned. His Northumbrian allies had been defeated and English forces retook many Welsh towns. The rebels resorted to guerilla warfare but by 1410 Glyndwr was a fugitive and he disappears from history, his fate a mystery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much as Owain Glyndwr emerged from the ranks of the Welsh gentry, so too did Henry Tudor, Earl of Richmond, who in 1485, as a somewhat tendentious claimant to the throne of England through the Lancastrian line, led an army of disaffected English magnates to victory over the Yorkist king [[Richard III]] at the [[Battle of Bosworth Field]]. Henry became King [[Henry VII]] and the progenitor of the [[Tudor dynasty]], the first Welsh king of England. Henry's son, [[Henry VIII]], completed the absorption of Wales into England in 1536, when the remaining parts of Wales were formally annexed to England and 'shired' - that is, divided into counties (shires) with sheriffs and lords lieutenant, rather than being ruled as marcher lordships.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Charles]], eldest son of [[Queen Elizabeth II]], is the current Prince of Wales, a title normally bestowed on the first-born son of the sovereign but implying no particular monarchical role in the Principality. The Welsh flag has a picture of a [[dragon]], usually called Idris.  The Welsh flag forms no part of the Union Flag as at the time the flag was first devised Wales was considered as part of the Kingdom of England.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even today in modern Wales, vestiges of anti-English sentiment remain strong in some parts; the Welsh Nationalist Party, [[Plaid Cymru]] typically returns several members to the British [[Parliament]], and with the unaffiliated Welsh terrorist group the [[Meibion Glyndwr]], (&amp;quot;the Sons of Glendower&amp;quot;) conducting a sporadic campaign of arson against English-owned holiday homes in recent years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.welshdragon.net/resources/Articles/arson.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Druidry]] survived as a major force in Wales until the 18th century, and may never have completely died out.  The first modern Welsh druids date from 1717, but they took many of their rites from existing practices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Government ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|- bgcolor=cccccc&lt;br /&gt;
! Position ||  Current Holder&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[British_monarchy|Monarch]] || Queen [[Elizabeth II]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[UK_Prime_Ministers|Prime Minster]] || [[Gordon Brown]] MP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Secretary of State for Wales|Secretary of State]] || [[Peter Hain]] MP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[First Minister of Wales|First Minister]] || [[Rhodri Morgan]] AM&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although constitutionally the United Kingdom is a unitary state with one sovereign, parliament and government - there has been moves to give power to national legislature in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, this has taken the form of devolution. Power for certain areas of government like education, health and the environment are fully the responsibility of their national governments. However, central government maintains the right to overturn any decision by a national assembly, as as such the [[Parliament of the United Kingom]] remains sovereign in the United Kingdom as a whole.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Devolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[National Assembly for Wales]] as established under the ''Government of Wales Act of 1998''. The assembly consists of 60 ''Assembly Members'' or ''AM''s. The [[Welsh Assembly Governemnt]] is the executive arm who have been delegated much of the powers of the Assembly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Industry ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
South Wales was formerly heavily industrialised, with [[coal]] mining and [[steel]]working, whereas North Wales is a pastoral area used mainly for [[sheep]]farming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Coal]] mining in South Wales has undergone a recent resurgence due to the discovery of new energy resources, particularly in the Crumlin area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sport ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Soccer]] enjoys major popularity, with [[rugby union]] being particularly popular in South Wales.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== World significance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welsh-derived surnames are common in the United States. The Welsh name ''Jones'' is in fact the fourth commonest surname in the U. S.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Smith, Johnson and Williams ranking first, second and third&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; within the hundred commonest surnames, the Welsh names Evans, Edward, Morgan, and Jenkins rank 48th, 49th, 57th, and 83rd respectively.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://names.mongabay.com/most_common_surnames.htm Most Common Surnames in the U. S.], website which claims its source is the U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, Population Analysis &amp;amp; Evaluation Staff&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Names beginning with a double L, such as ''Lloyd'' and ''Llewellyn'' are almost certain to be Welsh, as is ''Floyd'' (the &amp;quot;Fl&amp;quot; being an attempt to imitate the sound of the Welsh double-L.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is often said that the vowels in English are &amp;quot;A, E, I, O, U and sometimes Y;&amp;quot; however, in Welsh the letter W can be a vowel (pronounced roughly like a double-length U). Most English dictionaries contain some Welsh-derived English words such as ''cwm'' (a circular valley or ''cirque'') and ''crwth'' (an traditional Celtic fiddle-like musical instrument). These can be very effective stumpers when playing word games, provided of course that they are actually included in whatever dictionary is the authority agreed on by the players.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wales| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Principalities]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abertawe&amp;diff=435130</id>
		<title>Abertawe</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abertawe&amp;diff=435130"/>
		<updated>2008-04-19T22:28:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Redirecting to Swansea&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Swansea]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wrecsam&amp;diff=435129</id>
		<title>Wrecsam</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wrecsam&amp;diff=435129"/>
		<updated>2008-04-19T22:28:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Redirecting to Wrexham&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Wrexham]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Huddersfield&amp;diff=435127</id>
		<title>Huddersfield</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Huddersfield&amp;diff=435127"/>
		<updated>2008-04-19T22:17:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Links + UK spelling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Huddersfield''' is a town in West [[Yorkshire]], [[England]] in the [[United Kingdom]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is located in the [[Pennines]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is the birthplace of [[Harold Wilson]], [[Prime Minister]] of the [[United Kingdom]] 1964-1970 and 1974-76.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite its economy being based on [[sheep]]'s wool, after the colonization of Northern Canada and the resultant [[fur]] trade, Huddersfield  became noted as a major centre for the production of fur coats. This coincided with a decline in the [[cotton]] industry in the city and the closure of several factories which produced cotton undergarments. This is still the case today with many commentators noting that Edinburgh is &amp;quot;Aw furs an nae knickers&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Towns and Cities in Yorkshire]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ashton-under-Lyne&amp;diff=435126</id>
		<title>Ashton-under-Lyne</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ashton-under-Lyne&amp;diff=435126"/>
		<updated>2008-04-19T22:14:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: New page: '''Ashton-under-Lyne''' is a town in Greater Manchester, England, approximately six miles east of Manchester city centre. Until 1974 it was in the county of Lancashire. The...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Ashton-under-Lyne''' is a town in [[Greater Manchester]], [[England]], approximately six miles east of [[Manchester]] city centre. Until 1974 it was in the county of [[Lancashire]]. The River Tame flows through the town.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The M60 Manchester orbital motorway runs to the west of the town centre. The town's railway station is on the Manchester to [[Huddersfield]] line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically the the [[cotton]] industry and [[coal]] mining were important to the town’s economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ashton United Football Club and Curzon Ashton Football Club play in different English regional [[soccer|football]] leagues. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its population is 43,300 (2001).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Towns in Greater Manchester]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Leicester&amp;diff=386328</id>
		<title>Talk:Leicester</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Leicester&amp;diff=386328"/>
		<updated>2008-02-10T02:02:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Add signature to my own comment!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== East Midlands Airport ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The airport is called East Midlands Airport, not Nottingham East Midlands Airport. Please see [http://www.eastmidlandsairport.com the official website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Barclay|Barclay]] 21:02, 9 February 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nottingham&amp;diff=386327</id>
		<title>Nottingham</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nottingham&amp;diff=386327"/>
		<updated>2008-02-10T02:01:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Correct name of airport. See talk page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Nottingham''' is [[England]]'s eighth largest city with a population of 275,100. The Nottingham Urban Area conurbation has a population of 666,358. With the exception of [[London]], it is the largest [[British]] city to pre-date the [[industrial revolution]]. It lies roughly in the centre of England. It is the traditional county town of the county of [[Nottinghamshire]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nottingham was founded by the [[Celts]], before the [[Roman]] invasion of the 1st century AD, who knew it as ''Tigguo Cobauc'', meaning 'Place of Cave Dwellings'. This name is derived from the cave houses which the local inhabitants cut into the soft sandsone rocks and cliffs in the city. An Anglo Saxon city was built around where the Church of St Mary stands, on a low cliff in the Lace Market area of the city. Part of Danish controlled East [[Mercia]] after the treaty of Wedmore, it grew in importance as a Danish ([[viking]]) stronghold during the 9th Century, and was known as Snotingaham (&amp;quot;the homestead of Snot's people&amp;quot;), possibly named after a Norse leader. After the [[Norman]] Conquest of England in 1066, [[William the Conqueror]] had an imposing fortress, Nottingham Castle, built on top of a neighbouring cliff top and for a while, an English town and a [[French]] town grew. It is during this period of history that the legends of [[Robin Hood]] are set, focusing on the repression of the Anglo-Danish inhabitants of the Old City by the Norman nobility in the new French City. Nottingham Castle became one of Englands most important Royal fortresses, but was largely destroyed after the [[English Civil War]], by supporters of the [[Parliament]]. A new castle was constructed on the site in the 18th Century by the Duke of Portland, which was destroyed by [[Luddite]] rioters. The remains of this building now house the Nottingham City art gallery. &lt;br /&gt;
Nottingham grew rapidly during the industrial revolution and became one of the worlds most important [[lace]] manufacturing centres. Other important industries included [[Coal Mining]], and the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals and bicycles. Nottingham was bombed during the second world war, though many of its historic quarters have survived intact, the focus of air raids having been the industrial areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Modern Nottingham==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nottingham today is a thriving commercial centre and is the capital of the East Midlands Region. It is regarded as one of the top shopping destinations in the UK. It is well served by public transport to London (rail journeys take around two hours). East Midlands Airport is a minor international airport which serves mainly European destinations. &lt;br /&gt;
Major industries include pharmaceuticals and service industries. Nottingham is home to the UK Inland Revenue and the European Headquarters of several US and East Asian Corporations, such as Capital One. &lt;br /&gt;
Nottingham boasts two [[University|universities]], the British National Watersports Centre, and the British National Ice Arena, as well as several theatres, concert halls and conference centres, and the worlds oldest public house, [[Ye Olde Trip to Jerusalem.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Nottingham has a [[Catholic]] Cathedral. The Anglican ([[Church of England]]) Cathedral for [[Nottinghamshire]] lies in the nearby town of [[Southwell]]. The Ancestral Home of Lord [[Byron]], [[Newstead Abbey]] lies nearby.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Towns and Cities]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Nottingham&amp;diff=386326</id>
		<title>Talk:Nottingham</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Nottingham&amp;diff=386326"/>
		<updated>2008-02-10T02:00:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: New page: == East Midlands Airport ==  The airport is called East Midlands Airport, not Nottingham East Midlands Airport. Please see [http://www.eastmidlandsairport.com the official website]  ~~~~&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== East Midlands Airport ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The airport is called East Midlands Airport, not Nottingham East Midlands Airport. Please see [http://www.eastmidlandsairport.com the official website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Barclay|Barclay]] 21:00, 9 February 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Leicester&amp;diff=386325</id>
		<title>Leicester</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Leicester&amp;diff=386325"/>
		<updated>2008-02-10T01:58:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Revert. See talk page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Leicester''' is a city and is the county town of [[Leicestershire]], [[England]] through which the River Soar flows. Most of the city centre was built in [[Victorian]] times, including the railway station. The station is a regional interchange.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leicester, [[Nottingham]] and [[Derby]] are served by [[East Midlands Airport]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Engineering and the manufacture of textiles and clothing are important to the city’s economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Space Centre is based in the city and is linked to the University of Leicester.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leicester has one of the largest ethnic minority populations in the United Kingdom at about 37%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leicester City Football Club play in the English Championship League ([[soccer]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its population is 441,000 (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Towns and Cities]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Leicester&amp;diff=386324</id>
		<title>Talk:Leicester</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Leicester&amp;diff=386324"/>
		<updated>2008-02-10T01:57:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: New page: == East Midlands Airport ==  The airport is called East Midlands Airport, not Nottingham East Midlands Airport. Please see [http://www.eastmidlandsairport.com the official website]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== East Midlands Airport ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The airport is called East Midlands Airport, not Nottingham East Midlands Airport. Please see [http://www.eastmidlandsairport.com the official website]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Calcium_sulphite&amp;diff=386322</id>
		<title>Calcium sulphite</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Calcium_sulphite&amp;diff=386322"/>
		<updated>2008-02-10T01:48:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Redirecting to Calcium sulfite&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Calcium sulfite]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Calcium_sulphate&amp;diff=386321</id>
		<title>Calcium sulphate</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Calcium_sulphate&amp;diff=386321"/>
		<updated>2008-02-10T01:47:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barclay: Redirecting to Calcium sulfate&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Calcium sulfate]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Barclay</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>