Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

User talk:Avoge

2010-03-24T20:19:06Z

Avoge:

== Up for Discussion ==
Please present your points here. [[User:Avoge|A. Vogel]] 14:49, 3 November 2009 (EST)
Thanks for the support on my ban. I thought that "so called" was a little snarky. Thomas Paine was influenced by the Enlightenment.

Thanks for the support, my feelings exactly.

==A Warning==

Avoge, looking at your history it seems that you are very close to violating the 90/10 rule. I will not block you now, but you should take care to make more substantial edits in the future. [[User:Wuhao1911|Wuhao1911]] 16:13, 24 March 2010 (EDT)
:My apologies, I am unaware of what this rule is, can you please explain? [[User:Avoge|A. Vogel]] 16:16, 24 March 2010 (EDT)
::Most edits should be to mainspace articles. [[User:Wuhao1911|Wuhao1911]] 16:17, 24 March 2010 (EDT)
:::I will do my best, but I believe discussion should be had before any edits to mainspace articles. [[User:Avoge|A. Vogel]] 16:19, 24 March 2010 (EDT)

User talk:Avoge

2010-03-24T20:16:07Z

Avoge:

User talk:Bgbdvodo

2009-11-03T21:36:10Z

Avoge: Created page with 'he was blocked for removing "so-called?" that's ridiculous. ~~~~'

he was blocked for removing "so-called?" that's ridiculous. [[User:Avoge|A. Vogel]] 16:36, 3 November 2009 (EST)

User:Avoge

2009-11-03T19:51:27Z

Avoge:

I am:
*Rational
*Open-Minded
*Open to debate
*Pro-Choice
*An evolutionist
*For free-market capitalism
*For the rights of man
*For progress
*For the constitution
*Against Affirmative Action
*Against extreme taxes
*Against Obamacare, but for social healthcare
*Against Communism
*Against Fascism
*Against racism, slavery, oppression
*A world traveller

Define me.

== Up for Discussion ==
In the new United States, there were two primary parties: The Federalists (associated with Hamilton, Adams) and the Democratic-Republicans (associated with Jefferson). The Democratic-Republicans (I will refer to them as D-Rs) were what we may consider "liberals" in today's terms, and the Federalists were what we would often consider "conservatives."

The D-Rs:
*Supported weaker central government and stronger state governments - noted by Jefferson's general policy that any power not specified by the constitution should be denied to the Federal government.
*Supported freedoms of man
*Supported Slavery
*Against heavy Federal taxes
*Supported the Articles of Confederation (AoC) more strongly than the Federalists
It should be noted that the legacy of the D-Rs (the Democrats) were those who seceded the union, which resulted in the American Civil War.

The Federalists:
*Strong central government - noted by Hamilton's general policy that any power not specified by the constitution should be granted to the Federal government.
*Restricted some of the rights of man (Speech, Religion, Assembly, Press, Expression, etc) - noted by the Alien and Sedition acts
*Supported free-market
*For federal taxes
*Supported creation of the constitution over the AoC

Today, the left-wing Democratic party primarily:
*Supports heavier federal taxes
*Supports a stronger federal government
*is against slavery (noted by strong support for equality such as Affirmative Action)
*''is tied to the Atheist/Agnostic/less-strictly-religous population of the USA''
The remaining constant is the ideal of the rights of man above all.

Today, the right-wing Republican party primarily:
*Supports a central government which interferes little with the economy (Adam Smith's theories)
:*is against affirmative action and other government-legislated attempts to "force" equality
*Support lower taxes
*''is tied to the more strict Christian population of the USA''
The remaining constant is the ideal of free-market capitalism.

First of all, please correct any incorrect claims I have made by discussing on my talk, and I am fully aware that the short list of ideals above does not fully encompass every ideal represented by each respective party. Secondly, I'm looking to discuss '''what caused this change - near reversal - of ideals'''.
There is a section on my talk where this can be discussed.

User:Avoge

2009-11-03T19:51:02Z

Avoge:

I am:
*Rational
*Open-Minded
*Open to debate
*Pro-Choice
*An evolutionist
*For free-market capitalism
*For the rights of man
*For progress
*For the constitution
*Against extreme taxes
*Against Obamacare, but for social healthcare
*Against Communism
*Against Fascism
*Against racism, slavery, oppression
*A world traveller

Define me.

== Up for Discussion ==
In the new United States, there were two primary parties: The Federalists (associated with Hamilton, Adams) and the Democratic-Republicans (associated with Jefferson). The Democratic-Republicans (I will refer to them as D-Rs) were what we may consider "liberals" in today's terms, and the Federalists were what we would often consider "conservatives."

The D-Rs:
*Supported weaker central government and stronger state governments - noted by Jefferson's general policy that any power not specified by the constitution should be denied to the Federal government.
*Supported freedoms of man
*Supported Slavery
*Against heavy Federal taxes
*Supported the Articles of Confederation (AoC) more strongly than the Federalists
It should be noted that the legacy of the D-Rs (the Democrats) were those who seceded the union, which resulted in the American Civil War.

The Federalists:
*Strong central government - noted by Hamilton's general policy that any power not specified by the constitution should be granted to the Federal government.
*Restricted some of the rights of man (Speech, Religion, Assembly, Press, Expression, etc) - noted by the Alien and Sedition acts
*Supported free-market
*For federal taxes
*Supported creation of the constitution over the AoC

Today, the left-wing Democratic party primarily:
*Supports heavier federal taxes
*Supports a stronger federal government
*is against slavery (noted by strong support for equality such as Affirmative Action)
*''is tied to the Atheist/Agnostic/less-strictly-religous population of the USA''
The remaining constant is the ideal of the rights of man above all.

Today, the right-wing Republican party primarily:
*Supports a central government which interferes little with the economy (Adam Smith's theories)
:*is against affirmative action and other government-legislated attempts to "force" equality
*Support lower taxes
*''is tied to the more strict Christian population of the USA''
The remaining constant is the ideal of free-market capitalism.

First of all, please correct any incorrect claims I have made by discussing on my talk, and I am fully aware that the short list of ideals above does not fully encompass every ideal represented by each respective party. Secondly, I'm looking to discuss '''what caused this change - near reversal - of ideals'''.
There is a section on my talk where this can be discussed.

User:Avoge

2009-11-03T19:50:15Z

Avoge: /* Up for Discussion */

I am:
*Rational
*Open-Minded
*Open to debate
*Pro-Choice
*An evolutionist
*For free-market capitalism
*For the rights of man
*For progress
*For the constitution
*Against extreme taxes
*Against Obamacare, but for social healthcare
*Against Communism
*Against Fascism
*Against racism, slavery, oppression
*A world traveller

Define me.

== Up for Discussion ==
In the new United States, there were two primary parties: The Federalists (associated with Hamilton, Adams) and the Democratic-Republicans (associated with Jefferson). The Democratic-Republicans (I will refer to them as D-Rs) were what we may consider "liberals" in today's terms, and the Federalists were what we would often consider "conservatives."

The D-Rs:
*Supported weaker central government and stronger state governments - noted by Jefferson's general policy that any power not specified by the constitution should be denied to the Federal government.
*Supported freedoms of man
*Supported Slavery
*Against heavy Federal taxes
*Supported the Articles of Confederation (AoC) more strongly than the Federalists
It should be noted that the legacy of the D-Rs (the Democrats) were those who seceded the union, which resulted in the American Civil War.

The Federalists:
*Strong central government - noted by Hamilton's general policy that any power not specified by the constitution should be granted to the Federal government.
*Restricted some of the rights of man (Speech, Religion, Assembly, Press, Expression, etc) - noted by the Alien and Sedition acts
*Supported free-market
*For federal taxes
*Supported creation of the constitution over the AoC

Today, the left-wing Democratic party primarily:
*Supports heavier federal taxes
*Supports a stronger federal government
*is against slavery (noted by strong support for equality such as Affirmative Action)
*''is tied to the Atheist/Agnostic/less-strictly-religous population of the USA''
The remaining constant is the ideal of the rights of man above all.

Today, the right-wing Republican party primarily:
*Supports a central government which interferes little with the economy (Adam Smith's theories)
:*is against affirmative action and other government-legislated attempts to "force" equality
*Support lower taxes
*''is tied to the Christian population of the USA''
The remaining constant is the ideal of free-market capitalism.

First of all, please correct any incorrect claims I have made by discussing on my talk, and I am fully aware that the short list of ideals above does not fully encompass every ideal represented by each respective party. Secondly, I'm looking to discuss '''what caused this change - near reversal - of ideals'''.
There is a section on my talk where this can be discussed.

User talk:Avoge

2009-11-03T19:49:30Z

Avoge: Created page with '== Up for Discussion == Please present your points here. ~~~~'

== Up for Discussion ==
Please present your points here. [[User:Avoge|A. Vogel]] 14:49, 3 November 2009 (EST)

User:Avoge

2009-11-03T19:48:56Z

Avoge:

I am:
*Rational
*Open-Minded
*Open to debate
*Pro-Choice
*An evolutionist
*For free-market capitalism
*For the rights of man
*For progress
*For the constitution
*Against extreme taxes
*Against Obamacare, but for social healthcare
*Against Communism
*Against Fascism
*Against racism, slavery, oppression
*A world traveller

Define me.

== Up for Discussion ==
In the new United States, there were two primary parties: The Federalists (associated with Hamilton, Adams) and the Democratic-Republicans (associated with Jefferson). The Democratic-Republicans (I will refer to them as D-Rs) were what we may consider "liberals" in today's terms, and the Federalists were what we would often consider "conservatives."

The D-Rs:
*Supported weaker central government and stronger state governments - noted by Jefferson's general policy that any power not specified by the constitution should be denied to the Federal government.
*Supported freedoms of man
*Supported Slavery
*Against heavy Federal taxes
*Supported the Articles of Confederation (AoC) more strongly than the Federalists
It should be noted that the legacy of the D-Rs (the Democrats) were those who seceded the union, which resulted in the American Civil War.

The Federalists:
*Strong central government - noted by Hamilton's general policy that any power not specified by the constitution should be granted to the Federal government.
*Restricted some of the rights of man (Speech, Religion, Assembly, Press, Expression, etc) - noted by the Alien and Sedition acts
*Supported free-market
*For federal taxes
*Supported creation of the constitution over the AoC

Today, the left-wing Democratic party primarily:
*Supports heavier federal taxes
*Supports a stronger federal government
*is against slavery (noted by strong support for equality such as Affirmative Action)
*''is tied to the Atheist/Agnostic/less-strictly-religous population of the USA''
The remaining constant is the ideal of the rights of man above all.

Today, the right-wing Republican party primarily:
*Supports a central government which interferes little with the economy (Adam Smith's theories)
:*is against affirmative action and other government-legislated attempts to "force" equality
*Support lower taxes
*''is tied to the Christian population of the USA''
The remaining constant is the ideal of free-market capitalism.

First of all, please correct any incorrect claims I have made by discussing on my talk. Secondly, I'm looking to discuss what caused this change - near reversal - of ideals.
There is a section on my talk where this can be discussed.

User:Avoge

2009-11-03T18:27:32Z

Avoge: Created page with 'I am: *Rational *Open-Minded *Open to debate *Pro-Choice *An evolutionist *For free-market capitalism *For the rights of man *For progress *For the constitution *Against extreme ...'

Talk:Inherit the Wind

2009-10-27T14:00:03Z

Avoge:

Hi, Philip. I like your [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Inherit_the_Wind&diff=554411&oldid=554395 restoration] of the word "classic". Great minds think alike, eh? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:16, 11 November 2008 (EST)
: As long as I find the time, I'm going to be expanding this article quite a bit, and doing away with the large direct quotes in the process.
: I agree (I think this is your thinking) that simply calling it a "classic" implies something good, which implication is best avoided. On the other hand, though, we need to recognise and acknowledge things like it being considered a classic, rather than pretend that this isn't the case.
: I nearly reverted your changes to the introduction, thinking that the new wording was a tad awkward and was getting into criticism before description, but the more I thought about it, the more I concluded that your wording was better than what was there before. I still think it could be improved, but that might come with the expansion and taking a rather different approach to the introduction.
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:45, 11 November 2008 (EST)

I'd like to point out that "Inherit the Wind" this is not an attempt to portray the Scopes Monkey Trial accurately and in doing so distorting and fictionalizing it. Rather, it is really a play ''based off'' the Scopes Monkey Trial, using the real-life trial for certain plot elements. I suggest a change to present a more accurate picture of the play. [[User:Avoge|Avoge]] 10:00, 27 October 2009 (EDT)