<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Andyc1984</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Andyc1984"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Andyc1984"/>
	<updated>2026-10-01T00:58:31Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_Kingdom&amp;diff=968412</id>
		<title>United Kingdom</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_Kingdom&amp;diff=968412"/>
		<updated>2012-03-15T23:18:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Andyc1984: /* United Kingdom and moral decline */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''The United Kingdom&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;of Great Britain&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and Northern Ireland''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =United kingdom rel87.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|map2           =UK location.png&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Union_jack.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =UK Royal Coat of Arms.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=London&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Constitutional monarchy&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=English&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=HM Queen [[Elizabeth II]]&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =David Cameron&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =94,526 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =62,698,000&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=2011&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =$2.006 trillion&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=2006&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$35,051 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=Pound Sterling &lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''The United Kingdom''' ('''UK''') is a sovereign [[state]] north-west of mainland [[Europe]]. It comprises [[England]], [[Scotland]] and [[Wales]], which occupy the island of [[Great Britain]], and [[Northern Ireland]] on the island of [[Ireland]]. It attained its current identity in 1922 after most of Ireland was granted independence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom is a constitutional monarchy. Its [[head of state]] is [[Elizabeth II]], and its [[head of government]] is the Prime Minister [[David Cameron]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom has the fifth largest economy in the world, and is a member of the [[European Union]], [[NATO]] and the [[United Nations]]. British values, culture and institutions were spread throughout many parts of the world during the period of the [[British Empire]], 1600-1960, and British contributions to world culture include the English language, the [[parliament|parliamentary]] form of government, the [[Church of England|Anglican]] Church (&amp;quot;Church of England&amp;quot;), a tradition of personal liberty, and the common-law legal system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Name==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:London Thames Sunset panorama 2008.jpg|thumb|left|London - Thames panorama.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The official name of the nation (since 1927) is ''The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; From 1801 to 1927 the official name was ''The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland''. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The full official name is seldom used except in very formal or legal documents.  The short version for historical topics is either &amp;quot;Britain&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Great Britain.&amp;quot; The short version for recent events (since the 1970s) is &amp;quot;United Kingdom&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;UK&amp;quot; The adjective is always '''&amp;quot;British&amp;quot;'''.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Britain was part of the [[British Empire]], which has become the &amp;quot;British Commonwealth&amp;quot;, and is mostly a discussion club. Britain has a few scattered minor possessions, such as [[Gibraltar]], but gave up its last important colony--[[Hong Kong]]--in 1997.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Westminster in the evening.jpg|thumb|280px|Westminster in the evening.]]&lt;br /&gt;
* '''England''' is the largest of the four components of the United Kingdom.  &amp;quot;England&amp;quot; was often used to stand for the nation in older literature published before 1970. However use of &amp;quot;England&amp;quot; to refer to the entire country is now sometimes considered offensive by many citizens of the other three member countries and is thus discouraged.&lt;br /&gt;
* The standard language of the UK is English; [[Welsh]] has parity in Wales, and [[Gaelic]] is widely used on official documents, roadsigns, etc in remote Gaelic-speaking areas of western Scotland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacColl (2008) explores the use of the term 'Britain' in English, French, and Latin texts from the 12th century to the 16th. The term was flexible, used in a variety of ways (geographically, politically, and ethnically), and not always indicative of any specific meaning. The English at first tended to conflate 'Britain' with England or the southern portion of the island of Great Britain, though the term 'Greater Britain' was applied starting in the 14th century to refer to the entire island. The Scottish, beginning in the 15th century, used the term in the modern sense - as reflective of the entire island of Great Britain and the 'polity' of England, Wales, and Scotland. This latter usage paved the way for the relatively smooth ideological transition after the 1707 Acts of Union.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Alan  MacColl, &amp;quot;The Meaning of 'Britain' in Medieval and Early Modern England.&amp;quot;  ''Journal of British Studies'' 2006 45(2): 248-269&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Anthem===&lt;br /&gt;
The national anthem of the UK is currently ''[[God Save the Queen]]''. Should a male heir accede to the throne, the anthem will become &amp;quot;God Save the King&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; This same melody is also sung by American schoolchildren (with different words) as &amp;quot;My Country, 'Tis of Thee&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constituent nations have their own unofficial anthems. In the case of Wales, this is ''Hen Wlad Fy Nhadau'' (''Land of My Fathers''), and for Scotland it is ''Flower of Scotland''. England does not have its own distinctive anthem in the same way, but at sporting events in which England is competing as a separate nation, [[Edward Elgar]]'s patriotic song ''Land of Hope and Glory'' is sometimes used (although ''God Save the Queen'' is more commonly used). Additionally the hymn &amp;quot;Jerusalem&amp;quot; has a large number of supporters in England as an alternative to, or replacement for, the national anthem. In Northern Ireland, the Protestant and Catholic communities respectively use ''God Save the Queen'' and ''Amhran na bhFiann'', the Irish national anthem. ''Londonderry Air'' is often used as the anthem for Northern Ireland competitors in sporting events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==People==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tower Bridge London.jpg|thumb|340px|Tower Bridge, London.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom's population in 2004 surpassed 60 million--the third-largest in the European Union. Its overall population density is one of the highest in the world. Almost one-third of the population lives in England's prosperous and fertile southeast and is predominantly urban and suburban--with about 7.2 million in the capital of London, which remains the largest city in Europe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A net total of 408,000 people were added to the UK population in 2008, the largest numerical increase since 1972.  This was partly due to the highest fertility rate in more than three decades. More than half of the increase in births last year was due to non-UK born mothers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an ever-increasing aging population with the number of people over 85 now at a record 1.3 million, the equivalent of one in every 50 people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Royal College of Music 2007.jpg|thumb|left|Royal College of Music.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom's high literacy rate (99%) is attributable to universal public education introduced for the primary level in 1870 and secondary level in 1900. Education is mandatory from ages 5 through 16, although this is in the process of being raised to 18 for England and Wales. &amp;quot;Public&amp;quot; schools are elite private prep schools, such as [[Eton]] and [[Rugby School|Rugby]], attended by youth whose families can afford to pay high tuition rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All state-funded schools in the UK are required to start the day with a collective assembly that is 'wholly or mainly of a broadly Christian character' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=387464 Times Educational Supplement]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, although this is not always ahered too and there are small numbers of state-funded [[Muslim]], [[Jew]]ish and [[Hindu]] schools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About thirty six percent of British students go on to post-secondary education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Higher education has been a speciality for over 500 years at Oxbridge ([[Oxford University|Oxford]] and [[Cambridge University|Cambridge]]), with new &amp;quot;red brick&amp;quot; universities added in the 19th century and many others in the late 20th century. Universities contribute £33 billion a year to the economy.  Britain has a strong attraction for international students, with 342,000 attending in 2007 (compared to 672,000 in the U.S. and 183,000 in Australia). They spend £1.5 billion in tuition in Britain annually, plus another £0.4 billion off campus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Demographics===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Youth UK.JPG|thumb|British youth.]]&lt;br /&gt;
A group of islands close to continental Europe, the British Isles have been subject to many invasions and migrations, especially from Scandinavia and the continent, including Roman occupation for several centuries. Contemporary Britons are descended mainly from the varied ethnic stocks that settled there before the 11th century. The pre-Celtic, Celtic, Roman, Anglo-Saxon, and Norse influences were blended in Britain under the Normans, Scandinavian Vikings who had lived in Northern France. Although Celtic languages persist in Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, as well as Cornwall in south-west England, the predominant language is English, which is primarily a blend of Anglo-Saxon and Norman French. &lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2007 est.): 60.8 million.&lt;br /&gt;
*Annual population growth rate (2007 est.): 0.275%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Major ethnic groups: British 91%, Irish 2%, West Indian and African 3%, South Asian 3%, others 1%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Major religions: Church of England (Anglican), Roman Catholic, Church of Scotland (Presbyterian), Muslim.&lt;br /&gt;
*Major languages: English&lt;br /&gt;
*Education: Years compulsory--12. Attendance--nearly 100%. Literacy--99%. &lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Infant mortality rate (2007 est.)--5.01/1,000. Life expectancy (2007 est.)--males 76.23 yrs.; females 81.3 yrs.; total 78.7 years&lt;br /&gt;
*Work force (2007, 31.1 million): Services--80.4%; industry--18.2%; agriculture--1.4%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnic tensions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Britain is home to 2.4 million Muslims from numerous ethnicities. This population is growing 10 times faster than the national average. Regarded as one of the most tolerant countries in Europe, Britain struggles with questions of integration, particularly the social exclusion of its Muslims, as well as the psychological aftermath of the July 2005 suicide bombings on London’s public transport system carried out by young Britons of Pakistani descent, which left 52 people dead and over 700 injured.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Canterbury Cathedral.jpg|thumb|left|350px|Canterbury Cathedral (photographed during 1890-1900).]]&lt;br /&gt;
Religious faith, according to a 2011 survey, has declined sharply in Britain over the last two decades. Now only 42% of people describe themselves as Christian, as opposed to 66% in 1990. Most of the decline is due to a drift away from the Church of England, it is claimed, with only 20% claiming allegiance, down from 40%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003 the Office of National Statistics estimated 29% of the population identified with Anglicanism, 10% with the Catholic Church, and 14% with other Protestant churches. A 2007 survey reported that the number of Catholics (mostly Irish) attending Sunday services has overtaken the number of Anglicans doing so. A September 2006 English Church Census reported that Methodists were decreasing as a percentage of the population, while members of the Church of Jesus Christ Latter-day Saints (Mormons), Pentecostal churches, many churches from Africa, and the Eastern Orthodox Church, almost entirely immigrants, were increasing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; According to [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108478.htm U.S. State Department Report, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Individuals with no religious belief comprised 21% of the population in 2009. Muslims comprise 3% of the population. The Muslim community is predominantly South Asian in origin, but other groups from the Arabian Peninsula, Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Levant are represented. In addition, there is a growing number of indigenous converts. Although estimates vary, the Government places the number of mosques in the whole country at one thousand. Groups comprising 1% or less of the population include Hindus, Sikhs, Jews, and Buddhists. Individuals from Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim, and Sikh backgrounds are concentrated in London and other large urban areas, primarily in England. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attendance at religious services was significantly different from the number of adherents. According to a report released on May 8, 2008, by Religious Trends, only 4 million Christians attend services on a regular basis (defined as at least once a month) in the country. These figures do not include Northern Ireland, where higher%ages reportedly attend both Catholic (more than 60%) and Protestant (more than 35%) services. The Religious Trends report stated that more than 50% of Muslims regularly worship at mosques. Figures for Jews and other religious groups were unavailable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religious affiliation was not evenly distributed among ethnicities. According to the 2001 census, approximately 70% of the white population described themselves as Christians. Nearly 75% of black Caribbean respondents stated that they were Christians, as did 70% of black Africans. Meanwhile, 45% of Indians were Hindus and 29% were Sikhs. Approximately 92% of Pakistanis and Bangladeshis were Muslims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Northern Ireland, where divisions between nationalists and unionists evolved largely along religious lines, the 2001 census showed that 53.1% were Protestants and 43.8% were Catholics. Many Catholics and Protestants continued to live in segregated communities in Northern Ireland, although many middle class neighborhoods were mixed communities. The policy of the Government remained one of promotion of religious tolerance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two established (or state) churches--The [[Church of England]] (Anglican) and the [[Church of Scotland]] (Presbyterian). The Act of Settlement, enacted in 1688, states that no Catholic, or person married to a Catholic, may ascend the throne. &lt;br /&gt;
====Religion in schools====&lt;br /&gt;
The Government provides financial support—up to 90% of the total capital costs of the buildings and 100% of running costs, including teachers' salaries - to sectarian educational institutions that are commonly referred to as &amp;quot;faith schools&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Matthew Boulton College.jpg|thumb|Matthew Boulton College.]] &lt;br /&gt;
The Government also helps fund the repair and maintenance of all listed places of worship for religious groups nationwide and contributes to the budget of the Church Conservation Trust, which preserves &amp;quot;redundant&amp;quot; Church of England buildings of architectural or historic significance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Government has not classified the Church of Scientology as a religious institution and therefore has not granted the organization recognition for charitable status. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than 30% of state schools had a religious character. Nearly all of the 6,949 &amp;quot;faith schools&amp;quot; are associated with Christian denominations, although there are 31 Jewish, 7 Islamic, and 2 Sikh schools. An additional two Jewish, three Islamic, and two Sikh schools have also been tentatively approved by the Government to open. In addition, several hundred independent schools of a religious nature receive no state support but must meet government quality standards. Controversy arose in 2006 over 100 Islamic schools when an Office of Standards in Education (Ofsted) evaluation of these schools showed many were &amp;quot;little more than places where the Koran was recited.&amp;quot; The schools were given time to correct their deficiencies. A review is due in 2010. Some Christian faith schools also faced controversy. Some were accused of not following the national curriculum in science, teaching creationism instead. During the reporting period, a further controversy erupted when it was learned that some faith schools were not following an &amp;quot;open&amp;quot; admission policy as required by law, denying admission to both special needs children and those outside the faith of the school administrators. The Catholic Church and the Church of England have an agreement to voluntarily accept up to 25% of places for pupils from another religious group or no religious group. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost all schools in Northern Ireland receive state support. More than 90% of students attended schools that were either predominantly Catholic or Protestant. Integrated schools served approximately 5% of school-age children whose families voluntarily chose this option, often after overcoming significant obstacles to provide the resources to start a new school and demonstrate its sustainability for 3 years before government funding begins. Demand for places in integrated schools outweighed the limited number of places available. The May 8, 2007, devolution, or granting of power, authorized the Northern Ireland Assembly to decide on academic selection. Now there are more than 50 integrated schools, and the new Government permits existing schools to petition to change from sectarian to integrated. More petition for that status than are granted it. Some have accused the Government of a go-slow approach to avoid sectarian animus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The law requires religious education for all children, ages 3 to 19, in publicly maintained schools. In England and Wales it forms part of the core curriculum in accordance with the Education Reform Act of 1988. In Scotland, religious education of some sort is mandated by the Education Act of 1980. However, the shape and content of religious instruction throughout the country is decided on a local basis. Locally agreed syllabi are required to reflect the predominant place of Christianity while taking into account the teachings and practices of other principal religions in the country. Syllabuses must be nondenominational and refrain from attempting to convert pupils. Schools with a religious designation follow a syllabus drawn up by the school governors according to the trust deed of the school. All parents have the legal right to request that their children not participate in religious education, but the school must approve this request.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Daily collective prayer or worship of &amp;quot;a wholly or mainly of a broadly Christian character&amp;quot; is practiced in schools in England and Wales, a requirement that may be waived for students who obtain permission of the school authorities. The Education and Inspections Act 2006 permits sixth form students (generally 16-19-year-olds) to withdraw themselves from worship without their parents' permission or action. This new law does not exempt sixth form students from religious education classes. Non-Christian worship is permitted with approval of the authorities. Teachers have the right not to participate in collective worship, without prejudice, unless they work for a faith school. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After several controversial court decisions prohibiting full-face veils in school (but not head scarves) and the wearing of a Christian chastity ring, the Department of Education provided guidance that advises schools to &amp;quot;… act reasonably in accommodating religious requirements,&amp;quot; under human rights legislation. Some Muslim groups, including the Islamic Human Rights Commission, said it was inappropriate for the Government to provide guidance that regulated Muslim communities in matters concerning the expression of their religious beliefs. But it is also legally possible under the act, according to the guidance, to have a school uniform policy that &amp;quot;restricts the freedom of pupils to manifest their religion&amp;quot; on the grounds of health and safety and the &amp;quot;protection of the rights and freedoms of others.&amp;quot; The Government's guidance is meant to remind &amp;quot;head teachers&amp;quot; to act with a degree of sensitivity when considering decisions that will impact the cultural complexion of their communities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Census====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the 2011 Census the religious make-up of the UK at that time was:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellspacing=0 cellpadding=3&lt;br /&gt;
|+'''Religions in United Kingdom'''&lt;br /&gt;
!Belief                &lt;br /&gt;
!Thousands          &lt;br /&gt;
!Proportion &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian                 ||29,000           ||51.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|No Religion                 ||9104            ||15.5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Muslim                      ||1591             ||2.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hindu                            ||559    ||1.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sikh                            ||336    ||0.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jewish                           ||267    ||0.5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Other                            ||179    ||0.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Buddhist                         ||152    ||0.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pagan &amp;amp; Wicca                     ||40    ||0.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Total religious          ||45,163   ||76.8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|No answer                       ||4289    ||7.3&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
The answers were distorted by an internet campaign just prior to the census, encouraging people to actually question religion that claimed that if at least 50,000 people stated their religion as 'Jedi Knight' it would be officially classified as a religion. This was not true, though the Office of National Statistics does aggregate very small religions into the 'Other' category whereas a religion of 50,000 would be itemised separately. This separate listing does not constitute any form of official recognition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that non-practising Christians and the non-religious group are growing in the UK and Europe. At the same time, there is growth in the Islamic, Sikh and Hindu groups due to immigration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the four states of the United Kingdom, England and Scotland, have official state religions. The [[Church of England]] is the official religion of England and the (Presbyterian) Church of Scotland is the official religion of Scotland. The (Anglican) Church of Ireland was [[disestablished]] in 1871 and the (Anglican) Church of Wales was disestablished in 1920, whereupon it was renamed the [[Church &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;in&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; Wales]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Crown Dependencies===&lt;br /&gt;
A number of the smaller [[British Isles]], most importantly [[Jersey]], [[Guernsey]] and the [[Isle of Man]] are '[[Crown dependencies|British Crown Dependencies]]' and not members of the UK. Their governments are independent of that of the UK other than foreign and defence policy (the UK government retains the legal power to overrule the governments of the Dependencies, but this power has not been exercised since 1967), and they are not members of the [[European Union]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sports and Pastimes==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wembley Stadium.jpg|thumb|230px|Wembley Stadium.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the most popular [[sport]]s in the world today were developed or codified in the UK. These include [[soccer|football]] (which is called ''soccer'' in North America), [[cricket]], [[Rugby (Sport)|rugby]], [[tennis]], [[hockey]], [[baseball]] and [[golf]]. The UK is represented in international competitions by the individual nations (such as in football, the one-day form of cricket and rugby) and by the whole of the UK in other sports (such as [[athletics]], golf and tennis). The Test cricket team is that of 'England &amp;amp; Wales' (colloquially, just 'England') but from time to time has had Scottish and Irish players.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The UK remains a major sporting force both in competition and the administration of sport. It is dominant in several Olympic sports, notably cycling, rowing and sailing and a leading force in cricket, rugby union, and golf.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Certain venues have their own distinct and historical recognition and host a number of international competitions. These include Wimbledon for tennis, Silverstone for motor racing, and St Andrews for golf. There are several major venues for football, rugby and cricket.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Domestic sport is dominated by football with one of the strongest and most popular leagues in the world - the Premier League. This league is sponsored by Barclays Bank, so has the official name &amp;quot;Barclays Premier League&amp;quot;. Many of the Premier League's teams are well known outside the United Kingdom, especially the &amp;quot;big four&amp;quot; (Manchester United, Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool) and maintain followings around the world. Cricket and both codes of rugby also have strong and popular domestic leagues. Other popular sports include snooker, rowing, golf, tennis, athletics, cycling, darts, horse racing, and motor racing. These most popular sports are well covered by both the print press and television.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some sports which are more popular in other countries such as volleyball, handball, American football and basketball have small but dedicated followings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
United Kingdom supporters, unlike those of the United States, will virtually never support any  team that is an underdog (with the exceptions of West Ham United, Partick Thistle, Bromley, Manchester City, St Mirren, Norwich, Kilmarnock, Blackburn Rovers and the Scottish national team.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish_football.cfm?page=133&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)  It is surmised that this is due to the high levels of atheism. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See the evidence provided at [[Mystery:Why Do Atheists Dislike Underdogs?]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The UK is also renowned for its music, and is the home of bands like [[The Beatles]] and [[Radiohead]], as well as festivals such as [[Creamfields]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also [[British politics]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jewel House guard in the Tower of London.JPG|thumb|200px|Jewel House guard in the Tower of London.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Nationalist movements exist in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, seeking (in the case of Scottish and Welsh nationalists) to dissolve the United Kingdom and to win independence for their respective territories, and in the case of Northern Ireland nationalists and republicans to create a sovereign united Ireland. At the present time, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have their own legislatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom does not have a written constitution. The equivalent body of law is based on statute, common law, and &amp;quot;traditional rights&amp;quot;. Changes may come about formally through new acts of Parliament, informally through the acceptance of new practices and usage, or by judicial precedents. Although Parliament has the theoretical power to make or repeal any law, in actual practice the weight of 700 years of tradition restrains arbitrary actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Executive power rests nominally with the monarch but actually is exercised by a committee of ministers (cabinet) selected from among the members of the House of Commons and, less frequently, the House of Lords. The prime minister is normally the leader of the largest party in the House of Commons, and can remain in office for so long as he or she has the support of a majority in that body.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parliament==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Westminster palace Charles Barry.jpg|left|380px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Parliament was authorized in the [[Magna Carta]] (1215), and first summoned by King Edward I in 1296, the oldest governing body in the world.  Parliament represents the entire country and can legislate for the whole or for any constituent part or combination of parts. Elections are called by the prime minister, but the maximum length of a parliament is usually 5 years (except in wartime). The focus of legislative power is the 646-member House of Commons, which has sole jurisdiction over finance. Normally the government--the prime minister and cabinet--have full control of the House. If they lose control and new general election is held. The House of Lords, although shorn of most of its powers, can still review, amend, or delay temporarily any bills except those relating to the budget.  In 1999, the government removed the automatic right of hereditary peers to hold seats in the House of Lords. The current house consists of appointed life peers who hold their seats for life and 92 hereditary peers who will hold their seats only until final reforms have been agreed upon and implemented. The judiciary is independent of the legislative and executive branches but cannot review the constitutionality of legislation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the House of Commons are elected to represent specific geographic constituencies. Members are elected on a &amp;quot;First past the post&amp;quot; system and there is no proportional representation.  The upshot is that a third party with under 25% of the vote typically obtains very few seats.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Constituent countries==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scottish Eilean Donan castle.jpg|thumb|300px|Scottish Eilean Donan castle.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The separate identities of each of the United Kingdom's constituent parts are also reflected in their respective governmental structures. Up until the recent devolution of power to Scotland and Wales, a cabinet minister (the Secretary of State for Wales) handled Welsh affairs at the national level with the advice of a broadly representative council for Wales. Scotland maintains, as it did before union with England, different systems of law (Roman-French), education, local government, judiciary, and national church (the Church of Scotland instead of the Church of England). In addition, separate departments grouped under a Secretary of State for Scotland, who also is a cabinet member, handled most domestic matters. In late 1997, however, following approval of referenda by Scottish and Welsh voters (though only narrowly in Wales), the British Government introduced legislation to establish a Scottish Parliament and a Welsh Assembly. The first elections for the two bodies were held May 6, 1999. The Welsh Assembly opened on May 26, and the Scottish Parliament opened on July 1, 1999. The devolved legislatures have largely taken over most of the functions previously performed by the Scottish and Welsh offices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Northern Ireland had its own Parliament and prime minister from 1921 to 1973, when the British Government imposed direct rule in order to deal with the deteriorating political and security situation. From 1973, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, based in London, was responsible for the region, including efforts to resolve the issues that lay behind the &amp;quot;the troubles.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the mid-1990s, gestures toward peace encouraged by successive British governments and by President Clinton began to open the door for restored local government in Northern Ireland. An Irish Republican Army (IRA) cease-fire and nearly 2 years of multiparty negotiations, led by former U.S. Senator George Mitchell, resulted in the Good Friday Agreement of 10 April 1998, which was subsequently approved by majorities in both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Key elements of the agreement include devolved government, a commitment of the parties to work toward &amp;quot;total disarmament of all paramilitary organisations,&amp;quot; police reform, and enhanced mechanisms to guarantee human rights and equal opportunity. The Good Friday Agreement also called for formal cooperation between the Northern Ireland institutions and the Government of the Republic of Ireland, and it established the British-Irish Council, which includes representatives of the British and Irish Governments as well as the devolved Governments of Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. Devolved government was reestablished in Northern Ireland in December 1999. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agreement (more commonly known as the &amp;quot;Good Friday Agreement&amp;quot;, and more rarely as the Belfast Agreement&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nio.gov.uk/index/key-issues/the-agreement.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) was reached on Friday, April 10 1998 in Belfast and provides for a 108-member elected Assembly, overseen by a 12-minister Executive Committee (cabinet) in which unionists and nationalists share leadership responsibility. Northern Ireland elects 18 representatives to the Westminster Parliament in London. However, the five Sinn Fein Members of Parliament (MPs), who won seats in the 2004 election, have refused to claim their seats. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Principal Government Officials===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:674uyyhju.jpg|thumb|David Cameron]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Head of State '''- Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith''' who, as Head of State for many other countries also holds other titles particular to her role and rule as Head of State for those countries.  More commonly referred to as '''HM''' (Her Majesty) '''Queen Elizabeth II'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cabinet&lt;br /&gt;
*Prime Minister, First Lord of the Treasury and Minister for the Civil Service '''- Rt Hon [[David Cameron]] MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Deputy Prime Minister and Lord President of the council '''- Rt Hon [[Nick Clegg]] MP'''&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LibDem&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Member of the [[Liberal Democrats]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*First Secretary of State and Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs '''- Rt Hon [[William Hague]] MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Chancellor of the Exchequer '''- Rt Hon [[George Osborne]] MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor '''- Rt Hon Kenneth Clark QC MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for the Home Department and Minister for Women and Equalities '''- Rt Hon Theresa May MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for Defence '''- Rt Hon Dr Liam Fox MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills and President of the Board of Trade '''- Rt Hon Dr Vince Cable MP'''&amp;lt;ref name = &amp;quot;LibDem&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for Work and Pensions '''- Rt Hon Iain Duncan Smith MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change '''- Rt Hon Chris Huhne MP'''&amp;lt;ref name = &amp;quot;LibDem&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for Health '''- Rt Hon Andrew Lansley CBE MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for Education'''- Rt Hon Michael Gove MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government '''- Rt Hon Eric Pickles MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for Transport '''- Rt Hon Philip Hammond MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs '''- Rt Hon Caroline Spelman MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for International Development '''- Rt Hon Andrew Mitchell MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for Northern Ireland '''- Rt Hon Owen Paterson MP''' &lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for Scotland '''- Rt Hon Michael Moore MP'''&amp;lt;ref name = &amp;quot;LibDem&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for Wales '''- Rt Hon Cheryl Gillan MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport '''- Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Chief Secretary to the Treasury '''- Rt Hon Danny Alexander MP'''&amp;lt;ref name = &amp;quot;LibDem&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Leader of the House of Lords and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster '''- Rt Hon The Lord Strathclyde PC'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister without Portfolio '''- Rt Hon The Baroness Warsi PC&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also attend Cabinet meetings:	 &lt;br /&gt;
*Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General'''- Rt Hon Francis Maude MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of State in the Cabinet Office'''- Rt Hon Oliver Letwin MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister for Universities and Science '''- David Willetts MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Leader of the House of Commons, Lord Privy Seal '''- Rt Hon Sir George Young Bt MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury and Chief Whip '''- Rt Hon Patrick McLoughlin MP'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Attorney General '''- Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC MP'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.parliament.uk/directories/hciolists/hmg.cfm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political Conditions===&lt;br /&gt;
[[David Cameron]] became Prime Minister on May 11, 2010, after [[Gordon Brown]] resigned. Cameron leads a [[Conservative Party|Con]]-[[Liberal Democrats|Lib Dem]] coalition after failing to achieve a majority in the the 2010 general election&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Membership in the European Union===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Conservative Party|Conservative]] government of [[Edward Heath|Sir Edward Heath]] took the UK into the [[European Union]] in 1973. The [[Labour Party]] under [[Harold Wilson]] won the 1974 general elections and due to splits within the party, called the only national [[referendum]] asking the people if they wanted to stay in the Union. The &amp;quot;yes&amp;quot; vote won by a margin of approximately two to one. The Labour and Conservative parties have since had deep divisions over Union membership. Labour's 1983 manifesto promised to leave the Union, and whilst the Conservative party have never pledged to leave the Union, a growing band of &amp;quot;Eurosceptics&amp;quot; threatened to tear the party apart in the 1990s. All three major parties wish to stay in the Union although disagree over the level of integration, but smaller parties such as the UK Independence Party and the Referendum Party campaigned on the single issue of sovereignty being lost to the Union.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Defence and Foreign Relations==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:11943452 115b299206.jpg|right|240px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom is a founding member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and is one of NATO's major European maritime, air, and land powers; it ranks third among NATO countries in total defence expenditure. The United Kingdom has been a member of the European Community (now European Union) since 1973. In the United Nations, the United Kingdom is a permanent member of the Security Council. The U.K. held the Presidency of the G-8 during 2005; it held the EU Presidency from July to December 2005. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Armed Forces are charged with protecting the United Kingdom and its overseas territories, promoting Britain's wider security interests, and supporting international peacekeeping efforts. The 37,000-member Royal Navy, which includes 6,000 Royal Marine commandos, is in charge of the United Kingdom's independent strategic nuclear arm, which consists of four Trident missile submarines. The British Army, consisting of approximately 99,200 personnel, the Royal Air Force, with 42,000 personnel, along with the Royal Navy and Royal Marines, are active and regular participants in NATO and other coalition operations. Approximately 9% of the British Armed Forces is female, and 4% of British forces represent ethnic minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Royal Naval college UK.jpg|thumb|center|380px|Royal Naval College.]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Iraq===&lt;br /&gt;
The U.K. was the United States' main coalition partner under the designation Operation TELIC. Under UN Security Council Resolution 1483, the U.K. also shared with the United States responsibility for civil administration in Iraq and was an active participant in the Coalition Provisional Authority before the handover of Iraqi sovereignty on June 28, 2004. Britain's participation in the Iraq war and its aftermath remains a domestically controversial issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Iraqi oil supply was considered to be 'vital' to British interests. The British Government saw Iraqi oil as &amp;quot;vital&amp;quot; to the UK's long-term energy security, and the effective privatisation of its oil industry was central to the post-invasion plan for the country, according to previously unseen Whitehall documents. [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/iraqi-oil-supply-was-considered-to-be-vital-to-british-interests-2270072.html] ''The Independent.'' &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Iraq Inquiry is conducted to identify lessons that can be learned from the Iraq conflict; the inquiry is concerned over Mr. Blair's evidence on the legal advice he received before agreeing to join the invasion, and the timing of the decision to go to war. [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/chilcot-to-grill-blair-on-how-he-misled-iraq-war-inquiry-2185725.html] The Chair of the Inquiry, Sir John Chilcot (1939) was Staff Counsellor to the Security and Intelligence Agencies (1999-2004) and the National Criminal Intelligence Service (2002-06).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Afghanistan===&lt;br /&gt;
Britain stood shoulder to shoulder with the United States following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the U.S., and its military forces are part of the coalition force in Afghanistan. The British force in [[Afghanistan War|Afghanistan]] is at 9,000 in late 2009 and will rise by an extra 500 troops in 2010. British forces are primarily based in the Helmand region, where they are on the front line in the war against continued Taliban operations. In addition, Britain has contributed more than £500 million to Afghan reconstruction--the second-largest donor after the U.S. &lt;br /&gt;
===Israel===&lt;br /&gt;
Britain has shown a greater willingness than the United States to criticize the Israelis over settlements and what some call the disproportionate responses to provocations from Gaza and southern Lebanon. (Jewish Labour MP Gerald Kaufman is among the most vocal.) Like his predecessors, both Labour and Conservative, former Foreign Secretary Milliband has been unequivocal: &amp;quot;Settlements are illegal under international law,&amp;quot; he told Parliament in 2008; &amp;quot;They are a major blockage to peace in the Middle East on the basis of a two-state solution.&amp;quot; His successor William Hague, on 20 March 2011, &amp;quot;expressed our serious concern over the recent announcement of 400 new housing units in the West Bank. Continued settlements run contrary to peace.” A BBC poll in March 2011 found that 14% of British subjects have a generally positive opinion of Israel while 66% have a generally negative opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relations with the United States===&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom is one of the United States' closest allies, and British foreign policy emphasises close coordination with the United States. Bilateral cooperation reflects the common language, ideals, and democratic practices of the two nations. Relations were strengthened by the countries' alliances during both World Wars, and its role as a founding member of NATO, in the Korean conflict, in the Persian Gulf War, and in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The United Kingdom and the United States continually consult on foreign policy issues and global problems and share major foreign and security policy objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom is the fifth-largest market for U.S. goods exports after Canada, Mexico, Japan, and China, and the sixth-largest supplier of U.S. imports after Canada, China, Mexico, Japan, and Germany. U.S. exports of goods and services to the United Kingdom in 2006 totaled $92 billion, while U.S. imports from the U.K. totaled $93 billion. The United States has had a trade deficit with the United Kingdom since 1998. The United Kingdom is a large source of foreign tourists in the United States. In 2005, 3.4 million U.S. residents visited the United Kingdom, while 4.2 million U.K. residents visited the United States. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and the United Kingdom share the world's largest foreign direct investment partnership. U.S. investment in the United Kingdom reached $324 billion in 2005, while U.K. direct investment in the U.S. totaled $282 billion. This investment sustains more than 1 million American jobs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:London.jpg|thumb|left|280px|London's financial center.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Britain has been hard hit by the [[Recession of 2008]], with its major banks taken over or subsidized by the government.  Real gross domestic product declined by 4.6% in 2009, and is expected to rise by 0.6% before 2010 and probably will continue to increase by 1% in 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Britain has the fifth-largest economy in the world, is the second-largest economy in the European Union, and is a major international trading power. A highly developed, diversified, market-based economy with extensive social welfare services provides most residents with a high standard of living. Unemployment and inflation levels are amongst the lowest within the European Union.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1979, the British Government has privatised most state-owned companies, including British Steel, British Airways, British Telecom, British Coal, British Aerospace, and British Gas, although in some cases the government retains a &amp;quot;golden share&amp;quot; in these companies. The previous Labour government continued the privatisation policy of its Conservative predecessor, particularly by encouraging &amp;quot;public-private partnerships&amp;quot; (partial privatisation) in such areas as the London Underground. The economy of the United Kingdom is now primarily based on private enterprise, accounting for approximately four-fifths of employment and output. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bluewater Shopping Centre, Kent, England Crop 2009.jpg|thumb|440px|Bluewater Shopping Centre, Kent, 2009.]]&lt;br /&gt;
London ranks alongside New York as a leading international financial centre. London's financial exports contribute greatly to the United Kingdom's balance of payments. Ratings agencies rank the United Kingdom's banking sector as one of the strongest in the world and its banks are amongst the most profitable in the G-8. It is a global leader in emissions trading and is home to the Alternative Investment Market (AIM). It is also a government priority to make London the leading center of Islamic finance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Britain is the European Union's only significant energy exporter. It is also one of the world's largest energy consumers, and most analysts predict a shift in U.K. status from net exporter to net importer of energy by 2020, possibly sooner. Oil production in the U.K. is levelling off. While North Sea natural gas production continues to rise, gains may be offset by ever-increasing consumption. North Sea oil and gas exploration activities are shifting to smaller fields and to increments of larger, developed fields, presenting opportunities for smaller, independent energy operators to become active in North Sea production. &lt;br /&gt;
*GDP (at current market prices, 2007 est.): US$1.93 trillion.&lt;br /&gt;
*Annual growth rate (2009 est.): -4.6%&lt;br /&gt;
*Per capita GDP (2006 est.): US$31,800. &lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Coal, oil, natural gas.&lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture (1.1% of GDP): Products--cereals, oilseed, potatoes, vegetables, cattle, sheep, poultry, fish.&lt;br /&gt;
*Industry: Types--steel, heavy engineering and metal manufacturing, textiles, motor vehicles and aircraft, construction (5.2% of GDP), electronics, chemicals.&lt;br /&gt;
*Trade (2006 est.): Exports of goods and services--US$468.8 billion: manufactured goods, fuels, chemicals; food, beverages, tobacco. Major markets--U.S., European Union. Imports of goods and services--US$603 billion: manufactured goods, machinery, fuels, foodstuffs. Major suppliers--U.S., European Union, Japan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Currency===&lt;br /&gt;
The currency of the United Kingdom is the [[Pound|Pound Sterling]], commonly called Pound and written £ or GBP, divided into 100 New Pence (now commonly just called pence or 'p'). Traditionally the UK had a complicated triple currency structure of 20 [[shilling|shillings]] to the Pound and 12 &amp;quot;old pence&amp;quot; (represented by a &amp;quot;d&amp;quot; from the Roman ''denarius'') to the shilling, making a total of 240 pence to the Pound. This system was abandoned in 1971 due to difficulties with computerised accounting systems, in favour of the current [[decimal]] system. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The UK has never joined the [[Euro]] zone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stonehenge.jpg|thumb|left|Stonehenge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Roman invasion of Britain in 43AD and most of Britain's subsequent incorporation into the Roman Empire stimulated development and brought more active contacts with the rest of Europe. However, there was no permanent Roman imprint apart from roads and locations for cities. As Rome's strength declined, the country again was exposed to invasion--including the pivotal incursions of the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes in the fifth and sixth centuries AD--up to the Norman conquest in 1066. Norman rule effectively ensured Britain's safety from further intrusions; certain institutions, which remain characteristic of Britain, could develop. Among these are a political, administrative, cultural, and economic centre in London; a separate but established church and  distinctive and distinguished university education. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Union====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Wales and Scotland were independent kingdoms that resisted English rule. The English conquest of Wales succeeded in 1282 under Edward I, and the Statute of Rhuddlan established English rule 2 years later. To appease the Welsh, Edward's son (later Edward II), who had been born in Wales, was made Prince of Wales in 1301. The tradition of bestowing this title on the eldest son of the British Monarch continues today. An act of 1536 completed the political and administrative union of England and Wales. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While maintaining separate parliaments, England and Scotland were ruled by the same king beginning in 1603, when James VI of Scotland succeeded his cousin Elizabeth I as James I of England. In the ensuing 100 years, strong religious and political differences divided the kingdoms. Finally, in 1707, England and Scotland were unified as Great Britain, sharing a single Parliament at Westminster. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ireland's invasion by the Anglo-Normans in 1170 led to centuries of strife. Successive English kings sought to conquer Ireland. In the early 17th century, large-scale settlement of the north from Scotland and England began. After its defeat, Ireland was subjected, with varying degrees of success, to control and regulation by Britain. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The legislative union of Great Britain and Ireland was completed on January 1, 1801, under the name of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland (normally shortened to &amp;quot;Great Britain&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Britain&amp;quot;).  However, armed struggle for independence continued sporadically into the 20th century. The Anglo-Irish Treaty of 1921 established the Irish Free State, which subsequently left the Commonwealth and became a republic after World War II. Six northern, predominantly [[Protestant]], Irish counties have remained part of the United Kingdom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====British Expansion and Empire====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sir Francis Grant's Portrait of Queen Victoria.jpg|right|200px|thumb|''Queen Victoria'', by [[Sir Francis Grant]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''British Empire''' was the [[List of largest empires|largest empire]] in history and, for over a century, was the foremost [[Great power|global power]]. It was a product of the [[Age of Discovery]], which began with the maritime explorations of the 15th century, that sparked the era of the European [[Colonialism|colonial]] empires.  By 1921, the British Empire held sway over a population of about 458 million people, approximately one-quarter of the world's population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Angus Maddison. ''The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective'' (p. 98, 242). [[Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development|OECD]], Paris, 2001.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It covered about 36.7 million km² (14.2 million square miles),&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bruce R. Gordon. [http://www.hostkingdom.net/earthrul.html ''To Rule the Earth...''] (See [http://www.hostkingdom.net/Bibliography.html Bibliography] for sources used.)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; about a quarter of Earth's total land area. As a result, its political, linguistic and cultural legacy is widespread. At the peak of its power, it was often said that &amp;quot;[[The empire on which the sun never sets|the sun never sets on the British Empire]]&amp;quot; because its span across the globe ensured that the sun was always shining on at least one of its numerous [[colonies]] or subject nations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This phrase had already been used a few centuries before by the king [[Charles I of Spain]], referring to the [[Spanish Empire]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Begun initially to support William the Conqueror's (c. 1029-1087) holdings in France, Britain's policy of active involvement in continental European affairs endured for several hundred years. By the end of the 14th century, foreign trade, originally based on wool exports to Europe, had emerged as a cornerstone of national policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the five decades following [[World War II]], most of the territories of the Empire became independent. Many went on to join the [[Commonwealth of Nations]], a free association of independent states. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;T. O. Lloyd, ''The British Empire, 1558-1995. 2nd ed. (1996). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some have retained the [[British monarch]] as their [[head of state]] to become independent [[Commonwealth realm]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Sea Power====&lt;br /&gt;
The foundations of sea power were gradually laid to protect English trade and open up new routes. Defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588 firmly established England as a major sea power. Thereafter, its interests outside Europe grew steadily. Attracted by the spice trade, English mercantile interests spread first to the Far East. In search of an alternate route to the Spice Islands, John Cabot reached the North American continent in 1498. Sir Walter Raleigh organized the first, short-lived colony in Virginia in 1584, and permanent English settlement began in 1607 at Jamestown, Virginia. During the next two centuries, Britain extended its influence abroad and consolidated its political development at home, as the Royal Navy dominated the seas.&lt;br /&gt;
====Industrial Revolution====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bradford Industrial Museum.jpg|thumb|left|Bradford Industrial Museum.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Britain's [[industrial revolution]] greatly strengthened its ability to oppose Napoleonic France. By the end of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815, Britain was the foremost European power, and its navy ruled the seas. Peace in Europe allowed the British to focus their interests on more remote parts of the world, and, during this period, the British Empire reached its zenith. British colonial expansion reached its height largely during the reign of Queen Victoria (1837-1901). Queen Victoria's reign witnessed the spread of British technology, commerce, language, and government throughout the British Empire, which, at its greatest extent, encompassed roughly one-fifth to one-quarter of the world's area and population. It is controversial whether British colonies accelerated or slowed Britain's economic growth, for its growth rate fell below nations without empires, especially the U.S. and germany. Democracy came in fits and starts in a series of reforms that finally, by the 1920s, allowed all adults to vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====End of Empire====&lt;br /&gt;
By the time of Queen Victoria's death in 1901, other nations, including the United States and Germany, had developed their own industries; Britain lost its comparative economic advantage, and the ambitions of its rivals had grown. The UK joined world war I because of the invasion of [[Belgium]], and subsequently began [[World War II]] after the invasion of [[Poland]]. The losses and destruction of [[World War I|The First World War]], the [[Great Depression]] of the 1930s, the independence of the Dominions, and decades of relatively slow growth eroded the Britain's preeminent international position of the previous century. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nationalism became stronger in other parts of the empire, particularly in India and Egypt. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1926, Britain granted Australia, Canada, and New Zealand almost complete autonomy as &amp;quot;dominions&amp;quot;; beginning with the independence of India and Pakistan in 1947, the remainder of the British Empire was almost completely dismantled by the 1960s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== United Kingdom and moral decline ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitchens,_Stanford.jpg‎ |right|thumb|200px|[[Christopher Hitchens]] was an outspoken [[atheism|atheist]] in Britain.]]&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Britain and morality]] and [[Atheism and morality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2011 and in recent years, there have been number of reports on the decline of morality in [[Britain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/britain-needs-god ''Britain needs God''  by Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/lying-as-survival-strategy ''Why is England burning? by Creation Ministries International'']&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8695318/UK-riots-David-Cameron-promises-to-restore-sense-of-morality-as-police-get-new-powers.html UK riots: David Cameron promises to restore 'sense of morality' as police get new powers]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Editorials/Article.aspx?id=171651 British morality, Jerusalem Post, By JERUSALEM POST, 03/24/2010]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.socialaffairsunit.org.uk/blog/archives/000237.php The Strange Death of Moral Britain by Christie Davies]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/economy-lab/carl-mortished/uk-welfare-plan-saves-money-but-morally-bankrupt/article1790653/ U.K. welfare plan: Saves money, but morally bankrupt, Globe and Mail,Nov. 09, 2010 by Carl Mortished]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Peter Hitchens]] is the [[ex-atheists|ex-atheist]], now [[Church of England]] brother of atheist [[Christopher Hitchens]]. In an article entitled &amp;quot;Britain Needs God&amp;quot; [[Creation Ministries International]] declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Peter also wrote of what he saw as the growing public discourtesy and incivility in [[Britain]]. When he returned to London, after a five-year absence, he was shocked by the decline in people’s behaviour. He commented, “The rapid vanishing of [[Christianity]] from public consciousness and life, as the last fully [[Christian]] generation ages and disappears, seems to me to be a major part of it. I do not think I would have been half so shocked by the squalor and rudeness of 1990 [[Moscow]], if I had not come from a country where Christian forbearance was still well-established. If I had then been able to see the [[London]] of 2010, I would have been equally shocked.” In many respects, Peter’s book is a warning to people, as to the kind of society they can expect if they continue to reject Christian beliefs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creation.com/britain-needs-god ''Britain needs God'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an article entitled &amp;quot;Why is England Burning&amp;quot;, the Australian Bible study site Creation Ministries International ascribed the British riots of August 2012 to a &amp;quot;moral and social decline&amp;quot; that has been &amp;quot;the inevitable consequence of a nation rejecting God and His Word.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creation.com/lying-as-survival-strategy ''Why is England burning?'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[English Painting]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[British politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[June 2007 UK terror attacks]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/15/sir-john-chilcot-wrong-man Sir John Chilcot 'wrong man to head Iraq invasion inquiry'.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/iraqi-oil-supply-was-considered-to-be-vital-to-british-interests-2270072.html Iraqi oil supply was considered to be 'vital' to British interests.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{European Union}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:NATO members]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian-Majority Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:British Empire]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Andyc1984</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Urban_legend&amp;diff=956483</id>
		<title>Urban legend</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Urban_legend&amp;diff=956483"/>
		<updated>2012-01-24T23:46:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Andyc1984: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Urban legends''' are tales of unlikely events or gruesome happenings which befall 'a friend of a friend', and which hover just beyond the bounds of verifiability. A large number of such legends are comprehensively debunked by the Snopes Report&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.snopes.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Urban legends can be seriously damaging to individuals and corporations.  During the 1980s, [[Proctor and Gamble]] suffered poor publicity, due to an unfounded rumor that they were owned by the Church of Satan.  Political figures are often targeted.  A list of 'moron' quotes from Mad Magazine are now being forwarded via e-mail as actual [[George W. Bush]] quotes.  Photos of [[George W. Bush]] and [[Bill Clinton]] looking through binoculars with the lens-cap still on&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/binoculars.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is also widely distributed, though the picture was clearly doctored.(see Snopes)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:mythology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Andyc1984</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Urban_legend&amp;diff=956482</id>
		<title>Urban legend</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Urban_legend&amp;diff=956482"/>
		<updated>2012-01-24T23:43:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Andyc1984: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Urban legends''' are tales of unlikely events or gruesome happenings which befall 'a friend of a friend', and which hover just beyond the bounds of verifiability. A large number of such legends are comprehensively debunked by the Snopes Report&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.snopes.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Urban legends can be seriously damaging to individuals and corporations.  During the 1980s, [[Proctor and Gamble]] suffered poor publicity, due to an unfounded rumor that they were owned by the Church of Satan.  Political figures are often targeted.  A list of 'moron' quotes from Mad Magazine are now being forwarded via e-mail as actual [[George W. Bush]] quotes.  A photo of [[George W. Bush]] looking through binoculars with the lens-cap still on is also widely distributed, though the picture was clearly doctored.(see Snopes)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/binoculars.asp]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:mythology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Andyc1984</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Urban_legend&amp;diff=956481</id>
		<title>Urban legend</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Urban_legend&amp;diff=956481"/>
		<updated>2012-01-24T23:39:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Andyc1984: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Urban legends''' are tales of unlikely events or gruesome happenings which befall 'a friend of a friend', and which hover just beyond the bounds of verifiability. A large number of such legends are comprehensively debunked by the Snopes Report&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.snopes.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Urban legends can be seriously damaging to individuals and corporations.  During the 1980s, [[Proctor and Gamble]] suffered poor publicity, due to an unfounded rumor that they were owned by the Church of Satan.  Political figures are often targeted.  A list of 'moron' quotes from Mad Magazine are now being forwarded via e-mail as actual [[George W. Bush]] quotes.  A photo of [[George W. Bush]] looking through binoculars with the lens-cap still on is also widely distributed, though the picture was clearly doctored.(see Snopes)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:mythology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Andyc1984</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Botulism&amp;diff=956480</id>
		<title>Botulism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Botulism&amp;diff=956480"/>
		<updated>2012-01-24T23:37:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Andyc1984: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Botulism''' is a rare but serious paralytic illness caused by a nerve toxin that is produced by the [[bacterium]] ''Clostridium Botulinum''. This toxin is broadly considered to be the most powerful neurotoxin currently known. There are three main kinds of botulism, one of which is foodborne botulism caused by eating foods that contain the botulism toxin. Foodborne botulism can be especially dangerous as many people can be poisoned by consuming a shared contaminated foodsource. All forms of botulism can be fatal and are considered medical emergencies, often resulting in death secondary to respiratory failure if not treated. Good supportive care in a hospital, involving surgery, artificial ventilation and antitoxin administration is common for the treatment of all forms of Botulism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Botulism toxin is also used in a variety of cosmetic procedures (wrinkle and line reduction for example) and is known by the trade name &amp;quot;Botox&amp;quot;. It also has genuine medical uses such as the treatment of muscle spasms, excess sweating and chronic migranes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Help/A-Z_Index/index.asp USDA Index]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Microbiology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Andyc1984</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Evolution&amp;diff=956477</id>
		<title>Counterexamples to Evolution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Evolution&amp;diff=956477"/>
		<updated>2012-01-24T23:09:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Andyc1984: /* Irreducible Complexity */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Question-Evolution-Campaign.jpg|thumbnail|250px|right|The [[Question evolution! campaign]] by [[Creation Ministries International]] is a worldwide campaign which poses 15 questions that evolutionists cannot satisfactorily answer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/question-eviolution Question evolution! campaign] by [[Creation Ministries International]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 15 questions posed to evolutionists can be found [http://creation.com/15-questions HERE] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[theory of evolution]] does not permit the existence of any counterexamples.  '''If any of the counterexamples listed below is correct, then the theory of evolution fails'''.  Moreover, even if there is merely a 5% chance that each of these counterexamples is correct (and the odds are far higher than that&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Many of the counterexamples are indisputable, rendering each of their probabilities of being correct nearly 100%.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), then the probability that the theory of evolution is true is only about 15%.&lt;br /&gt;
==Counterexamples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Logical examples===&lt;br /&gt;
# The current annual rate of extinction of species far exceeds any plausible rate of generation of species.  Expanding the amount of time for evolution to occur makes evolution even less likely.	&lt;br /&gt;
# Evolution cannot explain artistic beauty, such as the brilliant autumn foliage and staggering array of beautiful marine fish, both of which originated before any human to view them; this lacks any plausible evolutionary explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
# Evolution cannot explain the lack of genetic diversity among the Homo sapiens species. Were evolution and the Old Earth theory true, the human population would show a much larger genetic variance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/descent.html#rpafAHIwKHS7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some scientists have stated that a troop of 55 chimpanzees contains more genetic diversity than the entire human race; this would support the idea that all chimps are descended from a relatively large initial population while all humans are descended from a much smaller initial population (two people, perhaps). 80% of all human diversity is found on the African continent, which accords with a human population growing from a small group in the post-Flood Middle East.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/descent.html#rpafAHIwKHS7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;[[File:Ara macao -on a small bicycle-8.jpg|thumbnail|300px|right|[[Parrot]] feathers are a problem for evolutionists.  For more information, please see [http://creation.com/parrot-fashion parrot feathers]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;see picture source and license [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ara_macao_-on_a_small_bicycle-8.jpg here]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Parsimonious repetition of design elements throughout Creation, e.g. the eye's appearance in remarkably different species.  For such complex structures to [[convergent evolution|arise repeatedly via evolution]] is [[statistical_impossibility  | impossible]], as evolution is an inherently random and historically contingent process.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i1/homology.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Pleiotropy'', the fact that a change of a single gene can have several different effects, renders the &amp;quot;improvement&amp;quot; of animals by random mutation impossible, as any mutation with a potentially beneficial effect will be coupled with one or more other potentially lethal effects.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/aid/v4/n1/beneficial-mutations-in-bacteria&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The development of feathers, which could not have conceivably &amp;quot;grown&amp;quot; from the scales of reptiles&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/40/4/687.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://palaeoblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/early-evolution-of-feathers.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# For evolution to be true, every male dog, cat, horse, elephant, giraffe, fish and bird had to have coincidentally evolved with a female alongside it (over billions of years) with fully evolved compatible reproductive parts and a desire to mate, otherwise the species couldn't keep going. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=90743&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# There are no historical records of anyone directly observing one species evolving into another, which would certainly be something worth writing about. Surely of the millions of species we have, someone would have witnessed ''one'' come into existence had it evolved.&lt;br /&gt;
# If evolution were to explain where human beings come from, then every personality type should benefit human life. This is clearly untrue because the world is filled with liars, psychopaths, and murderers. These traits clearly do not benefit humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
# If evolution were true, then there would be more than one species under the claimed genus ''Homo''. However, this is not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
# Evolution should lead to the extinction of homosexuality, as sinful homosexuals are unfit to contribute to the gene pool, yet to this day homosexuality continues to exist.&lt;br /&gt;
# The Theory of Evolution dictates that all organisms descended from single celled bacteria. Considering that bacteria is, and always has been, the most successful group of organisms, covering all areas of the globe in some of the most extreme environments, why would it have been advantageous to evolve into organisms that are so much more limited to the environments they can inhabit? Surely, staying as bacteria would be far more advantageous, due to their tolerence of extreme conditions, quick reproduction time, etc...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lack of mechanism===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Feather image.jpg|thumb|300px|right|[[Harvard]] biologist [[Ernst Mayr]] wrote: &amp;quot;It must be admitted, however, that it is a considerable strain on one’s credulity to assume that finely balanced systems such as certain sense organs (the eye of vertebrates, or the bird’s feather) could be improved by random [[mutation]]s.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes9.html Ernst Mayr, Systematics and the Origin of Species (New York: Dover Publications, 1942), p. 296]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# The extraordinary migration patterns of butterflies and birds cannot be explained through naturalistic development, and lack any plausible materialistic explanation&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[migration]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Evolution does not account for the immense amount of [[information]] in the genome. While there are various definitions of information, and many types have been observed to occur naturally, DNA contains information that is processed to lead to a result predetermined by the content of that information. Strictly speaking it is inaccurate to refer to DNA as a &amp;quot;code&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;language,&amp;quot; as many scientists are prone to doing. In fact DNA is more like a template, which produces messenger RNA (mRNA,) a new template with more appropriate bases for protein production. The mRNA essentially acts as a scaffold to which the appropriate amino acids attach to form a protein molecule. Rather than being a language containing words which each have a meaning, DNA is more like a jig or framework which allows a specific molecule of mRNA, and subsequently a specific protein sequence, to be assembled on it. In effect the information is the sequence of chemical reactions which that length of DNA will catalyse. Given the huge number of useless protein molecules which could be formed and the complexity of even a simple protein such as haemoglobin, this sequence could not have evolved by natural selection as the odds against the initial organism having a functional protein are too great.&lt;br /&gt;
# The development of feathers, which could not have conceivably &amp;quot;grown&amp;quot; from the scales of reptiles or any other known structure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/40/4/687.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://palaeoblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/early-evolution-of-feathers.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;[[File:Autumn.jpg|292px|right|thumbnail|The beauty of [[God]]'s [[creation]], such as [[autumn]] foliage, cannot adequately be explained through the evolutionary [[paradigm]]. See: [[Argument from beauty]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([http://www.flickr.com/photos/universalpops/5236103680/ Flickr] picture, see:'' [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/deed.en license agreement])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Humans exhibit behaviors such as performing [[science]], creating [[art]] and [[music]], [[dance|dancing]], and a number of other intellectual and artistic behaviors which could not have been produced by random mutations. There is no known evolutionary reason why these should be favored.&lt;br /&gt;
# Trematode parasites, like many other kinds, lack a plausible evolutionary phylogeny, though they can easily be explained by a teleological design.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/36/36_4/trematodes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Evolution cannot explain the many complex sex-determining systems. For example, in most mammals, females have two identical sex chromosomes (XX in this case) whereas males two different ones (XY.) However in birds, reptiles, many insects, and other organisms, the situation is reversed to where the male has two identical sex chromosomes and the female has two different ones; for example male birds have a ZZ chromosome pair and females ZW. No evolutionist has proposed a mechanism by which mammals could have a different sex chromosome system from the reptile ancestors they allegedly share with birds.&lt;br /&gt;
# Evolution requires that random mutations can cause one [[kind]] to change into another, but this has never been observed.   &lt;br /&gt;
# The existence of two symmetrical kidneys, which are unnecessary in most people, lacks a plausible evolutionary explanation based on functionality alone.  Because evolution falsehoods mislead most people into thinking they need their second kidney, &amp;quot;the average waiting time for the organs from a deceased donor in the United States is five years&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;3,916 patients waiting for a kidney in 2006 died before one became available.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.scienceline.org/2009/03/04/levitan-health-living-kidney-donor-transplant/]  This article observes, &amp;quot;As a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found, living kidney donors live as long or longer and enjoy better quality of life than the general population.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
#Thousands of years of intense selective breeding should have produced a new wolf species from domesticated dogs, yet dogs and wolves remain the same species.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Maladaptation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Inability to account for widely observed altruism among animals, as it ''reduces'' an animal's ability to survive.  “The existence of altruism between different species — which is not uncommon — remains an obstinate enigma.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood''  [http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes12.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Not surprisingly, many atheist evolutionists have done their utmost to ''deny'' animal altruism.&lt;br /&gt;
# The gradual buildup of deleterious mutations in an organism's genome as the species grows older limits the maximum lifespan of a species well under what would be required for evolution.  Each generation of humans has far more negative mutations than the posited natural selection can remove.  Evolution is thus impossible as species would become nonviable long before they could diverge.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/descent.html#rpafAHIwKHS7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wrong predictions===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Harvester-ants.jpg|thumb|205px|right|Ant behavior is the result of [[intelligent design]]. 19th century [[Europe|European]] naturalists were wrong about [[ant]] behavior. The [[Bible]] was correct about ant behavior.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://ed5015.tripod.com/BWilliamsvsAnon71to73.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Lack of any demonstrable vestigial parts of the human [[genome]]. While evolutionists often claim that regions of the genome are &amp;quot;[[junk DNA]]&amp;quot; and would not have been placed there by a designer, none have actually shown this to be true, and much so-called &amp;quot;junk DNA&amp;quot; has been shown to be useful.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/junkdna.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# While evolutionists argue that there are examples of &amp;quot;[[argument from poor design|bad design]]&amp;quot; in the bodies of many organisms, such as &amp;quot;flaws&amp;quot; in the human spine and sinus system, evolutionists fail to realize that, by their own theory, natural selection should have removed these things! The simpler explanation, that these represent degeneration from an original, created perfect form, is the superior one.  In other word, as [[CreationWiki]] notes, such &amp;quot;flaws&amp;quot; are actually &amp;quot;a result of deterioration, resulting from Man's Fall.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creationwiki.org/Functional_integration_indicates_design_(Talk.Origins) Functional integration indicates design], from [[CreationWiki]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# We have the perfect number of [[teeth]] to fit in our [[mouth]]s.  While creationism perfectly accounts for that result, evolutionism predicts a contrary result: As our [[face]]s evolved from chimpanzee-like faces to human faces, the shortening of the muzzle would have caused the teeth to become badly overcrowded in the front of the mouth.   &lt;br /&gt;
# Human fertility is rapidly declining, disproving evolutionary improvement in humans and also suggesting a brief timeline for human existence.   &lt;br /&gt;
# Evolutionist theory predicts that in the case of [[convergent evolution]], a particular structure such as an eye that evolves in an optimal form in one species can later evolve in a suboptimal form in a different species.  No such result has ever been observed.   &lt;br /&gt;
# Constantly mutating, drug-resistant [[pathogen]]s such as [[MRSA]] have been demonstrated to be the result of devolution rather than evolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.answersingenesis.org/PublicStore/product/Genesis-of-Germs-The,5181,224.aspx Genesis of Germs], from [[Answers in Genesis]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This is the exact opposite of what evolutionary theory predicts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Missing fossils===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:800px-Baleen Whale Physical Characteristics svg.png|right|300px|thumbnail|The remarkable [[whale]], which is a [[mammal]], has no plausible evolutionary ancestor.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# No transitional forms appear for horses, instead different and distinct horse-like animals appear in the fossil record&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Ray Comfort]], in the Forward to the 150th anniversary edition of &amp;quot;On the Origin of Species&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The enormous gaps and lack of intermediate species in the [[fossils|fossil]] record, once all the frauds are removed.&lt;br /&gt;
# Mammalian fur and body hair.  There is no known evolutionary pathway for the development of fur, and no fossil evidence of hair evolving from scales, even though it survives very well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/40/40_4/Bergman.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irreducible Complexity===&lt;br /&gt;
# The extraordinarily long neck of the [[giraffe]]. The giraffe's heart creates immense pressure to drive blood up the neck to the brain. Because of this there are valves in the neck which automatically restrict the blood flow when the giraffe lowers its head to drink. Without these valves the sudden increase in blood pressure as the heart no longer needs to overcome gravity would rupture the arteries in the brain and kill the giraffe. However the giraffe could not have evolved a long neck without the valves and had no need to evolve the valves unless it had a long neck. The okapi, which evolutionists claim is the closest relative of the giraffe, has no such valves. Evolutionary theory cannot explain this. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www1.pacific.edu/~e-buhals/GIRAFFE2.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;[[Image:BacterialFlagellum.jpg|thumb|200px|right|[[flagellum|Bacterial Flagellum]] with rotary motor, courtesy of Access Research Network (Art Battson)]] &lt;br /&gt;
# The development of wings in birds, as intermediary wing stubs would have no use, and be a competitive disadvantage.&lt;br /&gt;
# The [[flagellum]] of certain bacteria contain a multi-part cellular motor which fails to function if a single part is removed. This is the classic example of [[irreducible complexity]] as publicised by Professor [[Michael Behe]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.millerandlevine.com/km/evol/design2/article.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Because the flagellum must have all its parts to function it could not have evolved and therefore must have been designed by an intelligent being. At the [[Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District]] trial, Professor [[Ken Miller]] attempted to rebut this argument by pointing out that if 42 parts of the flagellum are removed what remains is a fully functional Type III Secretory System, used by some bacteria to inject toxins into target cells. While Miller's claim is factually accurate, it fails to explain how the T3SS could simultaneously add 42 parts to create a working flagellum.&lt;br /&gt;
# The organ and brain development required for retinal imagery require a base level of complexity, making a primitive form useless and impossible under evolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/43/43_1/retinal_imagery.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The [[ear]] contains three tiny [[bone]]s that transmit sound waves from the eardrum to the cochlea.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/bigear.html Neuroscience for Kids: The Ear]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Because of the complicated arrangement of those bones, transitional forms (which have never been found) would have served no purpose. Evolutionists claim that these bones used to form part of the reptilian jaw joint, but no intermediate fossil with half jaw/half ear has ever been found, and there is no way evolutionism can explain how a jaw becomes an ear.&lt;br /&gt;
# Bony skeletons represent an example of irreducible complexity, since only a fully formed, complete skeleton is of any use whatsoever, while having only one or some few number of bones in an otherwise invertebrate creature is hardly advantageous. It is inconceivable to think that some random mutation could have resulted in the formation if an entire bone system in a creature which was previously invertebrate.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;Social insects&amp;quot; such as bees, ants, and termites, which have extremely complex caste systems.  Where an insect fits into the system is determined by its diet when young.  Evolution requires that the genes for the various castes and the genes for caste-specific behavior all appeared simultaneously.  Akin to the concept of [[irreducible complexity]], but on a higher (social) order, this is impossible given random chance. The complex social structure of these insects is evidence of [[intelligent design]]; also, since the overwhelming majority of individuals are workers and do not reproduce, they do not perpetuate their genetic material, as evolutionism claims all living things must do.&lt;br /&gt;
#Lungs never would have had to develop unless the animal was already on land, in which case, they would die before reproducing.&lt;br /&gt;
#There is no explanation within the theory of evolution through natural selection for the mechanism in which a catapillar turns into a butterfly. Essentially the original animal is broken down and rearranged into a totally different animal, with no simmilar physical characteristics. This process cannot be explained within the theory, and points to a designer's involvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Uncategorized===&lt;br /&gt;
# Evolution would result in modern languages having one common ancestral language, and for nearly a century linguists insisted that there must be one.  There is not, and linguists now accept that there are completely independent families of languages.&lt;br /&gt;
# No other animal exhibits [[religion]]. A far better explanation than random mutations is that humans were given the capacity to be religious by a loving God who wants a relationship with His creations.&lt;br /&gt;
# Circadian phenomena -- internal 24-hour clock mechanisms of humans and other living beings -- defy material explanation.  Examples include how some people are unable to change the timing of their need for sleep for each day, and how plants exhibit clock-like behavior regardless of their exposure to sunlight.  In addition, there is a weekly clock cycle for many phenomena, which has a clear biblical basis but defies any materialistic explanation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.biblestudy.org/godsrest/mysterious-seven-day-cycle-in-plants-animals-man-2.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Scientists have found proof that the first chicken came before the first egg,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38238685/ns/technology_and_science-science/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; consistent with a special creation of chickens but not with a gradual descent with modifications from a proto-chicken and proto-egg.&lt;br /&gt;
# Despite the large (and ever increasing) number of breeds of [[dog]]s, and the fact that some pure bred lineages of dogs are reproductively isolated from other dogs, no new species of dog has evolved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/dogs-breeding-dogs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question evolution! campaign ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Carl weiland.jpg|thumbnail|150px|right|Dr. [[Carl Wieland]] is the Managing Director of [[Creation Ministries International]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Question evolution! campaign]] and [[Atheists doubting the validity of atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since [[World War II]] a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the [[evolution|theory of evolution]] which employs [[methodological naturalism]] have been atheists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Dr. Don Batten,[http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/737/ A ''Who’s Who'' of evolutionists] ''Creation'' 20(1):32, December 1997.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jonathan Sarfati]], Ph.D.,F.M., [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3830 ''Refuting Evolution'', Chapter 1, Facts and Bias]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2011, a campaign called the [[Question evolution! campaign]] was launched by the [[Bible|biblical]] [[creation]] organization [[Creation Ministries International]] which is a worldwide &amp;quot;[[grassroots|grass-roots]] movement to challenge the anti-[[Christianity|Christian]] [[dogma]] of [[evolution]]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creation.com/question-evolution Question evolution! campaign]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The focus of the Question evolution! campaign is on &amp;quot;15 questions that evolutionists cannot satisfactorily answer.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creation.com/question-evolution Question evolution! campaign]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 15 questions posed to evolutionists (and undecided individuals) can be found [http://creation.com/15-questions HERE]  The campaign will be primarily conducted in the [[United States]], the [[United Kingdom]], [[Canada]], [[Europe]], [[Australia]], [[New Zealand]], [[Singapore]] and [[South Africa]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/question-evolution&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Logical Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
As scientific theories require that their laws be immutable, the existence of merely one counterexample disproves the truth of the rule.  Thus, if evolution fails to account for any one of these items (or countless others), it must be discarded.&lt;br /&gt;
{{evolution}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolution and atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to an Old Earth]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Creation vs. Evolution Videos]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to Relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to the Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/ Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Counterexamples]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Evolution]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Andyc1984</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=England&amp;diff=897908</id>
		<title>England</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=England&amp;diff=897908"/>
		<updated>2011-08-06T14:17:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Andyc1984: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:England.gif|right|thumb|300px|England (highlighted in light green), showing the boundaries of the ceremonial counties.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''England''' is a constituent country of the [[United Kingdom]] located on the island of [[Great Britain]] in the north-west of [[Europe]].&lt;br /&gt;
It is home of the [[English]] language currently spoken by perhaps a billion people worldwide, and was the seat of an empire that spanned the globe.&lt;br /&gt;
England is the largest of the UK's constituent countries, both in terms of area and population. It is also home to the UK's capital and [[parliament]], making this area politically and economically important to the UK as a whole. England's government is technically a Constitutional Monarchy, although it exhibits many aspects of [[Socialism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The prehistoric inhabitants of the island of Britain were largely [[Celt]]ic.&lt;br /&gt;
From AD 43, the [[Roman]]s invaded [[Britain]] and took control of the southern half of the islands, where they founded the fort of &amp;quot;Londinium&amp;quot;, which later became [[London]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:England900.jpg|thumb|280px|England and its neighbors about 900 AD]]&lt;br /&gt;
As the [[Roman Empire]] abandoned Britain in AD410, [[Germanic]] tribes, specifically the [[Angles]], [[Saxons]] and [[Jutes]], began to settle over the majority of the island. Kingdoms formed, such as Northumbria (Anglian) in the north, Wessex (named after the West Saxons) in the south west and Kent (probably settled by Jutes, and now the name of a county) in the south east. Parts of the regions now known as [[Wales]], [[Scotland]], and the county of Cornwall continued to be independent Celtic nations for some time after this.  The Germanic invaders were still [[pagan]]s when they conquered part of Britain (e.g. [[Penda]] of Mercia was (allegedly) the last pagan King). The English peoples were converted to [[Christianity]], however, in the 7th Century AD. This happened from two directions: the mission of [[St. Augustine]], emissary of Gregory the Great came initially to Kent, while the (successful) mission to the Northumbrian Angles (and from there to peoples further south) was from the [[Celtic Church]] based in northern British monasteries such as [[Iona]] and [[Lindisfarne]]. The entire [[British Isles]] later came under the sway of [[Roman Catholicism]] as the powerful Northumbrian King, Oswy, chose in favour of Roman practice in AD 664 ('Synod of Whitby').  &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:London England.jpg|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Later, in 1066 AD, the Norman French Duke [[William the Conqueror]] defeated the last [[Anglo-Saxon]] King, [[Harold Godwinson]]. William established himself as king of England, and the present day English monarchy traces its descent from William. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amongst the privileged elite [[French]] language and customs became a part of English culture, however for the most part the common population continued to use their own language and customs. William retained significant territories on mainland Europe, in what is now France. For many hundreds of years England fought a series of wars (including the [[Hundred Years War]]) for possession of northern France. These did not end until 1588 with the loss of [[Calais]]. The [[Channel Islands]] are still a crown dependency to this day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the basis of their territories in England and France the Norman monarchs became influential in Europe. In 1215, rebellious nobles forced [[King John]] to sign the [[Magna Carta]], essentially a charter guaranteeing the rights of the king's subject nobles and the church, and setting forward the precedent that the monarch's powers were bound by law. In 1455-1487 a series of conflicts called the [[Wars of the Roses]] were fought between the noble families of York and Lancaster for control of the throne.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the [[Wars of the Roses]] had been won by Henry of Lancaster, the reign of the [[Tudor dynasty|Tudors]] began. Henry VII, as he became, was more concerned with defending his crown and so concentrated mainly on domestic policies. While Henry VII is one of England's less famous kings he was one of the few monarchs ever to leave the crown solvent upon his death. Henry VIII, unlike his father, was obsessed with winning glory on the battlefield, preferably in France. Henry launched three major wars throughout his reign against France and in the process managed to capture Boulogne. However Henry is most famous for his split with Rome. When the current [[Pope]] refused to allow him to divorce his first wife Catherine of Aragon, Henry declared himself head of the English Church and decreed that the Pope had no power over England. During his reign Henry had six wives, of which only three bore him children. Of these, only one was a son - a sickly child who reigned as Edward VI for just six years after his father's death. His daughter Elizabeth, however, was crowned Queen in 1558 and became perhaps England's greatest and best-loved monarch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Religion ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1533 AD King [[Henry VIII]] formed the [[Church of England]] (CoE) after the [[pope]] refused to annul the marriage between the king and [[Catherine of Aragon]]; while originally the CoE followed a policy of [[Catholic]] without the pope, his successors [[Edward VI]] and [[Elizabeth I]] moved the church in a far more [[Protestantism|protestant]] direction. Henry established himself as the head of the church and made it the state religion of England. This situation continues to this day, although in much modified form. The queen is still the nominal head of the church, although purely as a figurehead. Decisions technically taken by the queen are in fact done only on the advice of her ministers, who in matters of the church invariably act on the advice of the church leaders. Until recently certain bishops of the Church of England were automatically given seats in the House of Lords. The Church of England is closely involved with the ceremonies associated with England, for example at coronations or royal weddings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the [[Reformation]] the country has remained primarily Anglican with the notable exception of the Catholic reigns of [[Mary I]] and [[James II]]. More recently, the number of [[Roman Catholics]] is poised to overtake the number of [[Anglicans]] in the country, a trend that is likely to continue with an influx of migrants from Catholic countries such as [[Ireland]] and recent [[EU]] accession countries such as [[Poland]][http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/article1386939.ece]. As with the UK as a whole, the significant minority religions include [[Hinduism]], [[Judaism]] and [[Islam]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 2001 census gave the following figures for religious affiliation: [[Christianity]]: 71.6%, [[Islam]]: 3.1%, [[Hindu]]: 1.1%, [[Sikh]]: 0.7%, [[Jewish]]: 0.5%, and [[Buddhist]]: 0.3%, No Faith: 22.3%. Approximately 7% of responders did not answer the question.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001/profiles/commentaries/ethnicity.asp &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Unlike American Schools, State run Comprehensive schools in England have a daily act of Christian worship, although there have been efforts in recent times to remove this to properly reflect the multifaith make-up of England &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/dec/26/scrap-compulsory-acts-of-worship&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (as well as this it does support some &amp;quot;faith schools&amp;quot; such as Peter Vardy's Emmanuel Schools Foundation through the Academies program).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Influence ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
England is the home of the English language, which was later spread to all parts of the world by the [[British Empire]], along with traditional English concepts such as the rule of law, universal suffrage, parliamentary government, the jury system, and freedom of speech. The language and these such rights of man are especially evident in the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[English Bill of Rights]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[English Civil War]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[English Painting]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[English coronation oath]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:England| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:British History]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Andyc1984</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kent_Hovind&amp;diff=897907</id>
		<title>Kent Hovind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kent_Hovind&amp;diff=897907"/>
		<updated>2011-08-06T14:09:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Andyc1984: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:KentHovind.jpg|200px|thumb|right|Kent Hovind giving a presentation]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Dr. Kent Hovind''' (born 1953), commonly called &amp;quot;Dr. Dino&amp;quot;, is a prominent and controversial [[Young Earth Creationism|young Earth creationist]]. He founded Creation Science Evangelism in 1989&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.drdino.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and has a doctoral degree in Christian education from [[Patriot University]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2001, Hovind opened a theme park in Pensacola, Florida called Dinosaur Adventure Land, filled with exhibits explaining God's Creation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 19th 2007, Hovind was sentenced to 10 years in prison on 58 federal accounts of tax related offences, and is scheduled for release on August 11th, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
== Criticism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Karen Bartelt, a critic of Hovind, questions the quality of his doctoral thesis and the academic standards of the university from which he received it, believing both to be subpar for institutions of higher learning.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://chem.tufts.edu/science/Stear-NoAiG/no-AiG/bartelt_dissertation_on_hovind_thesis.htm Karen Bartelt, Ph.D. &amp;quot;The Dissertation Kent Hovind Doesn't Want You To Read.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2009, Hovind's thesis was leaked to the public, with the content matching Bartelt's review.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://foo.ca/wp/2009/12/10/kent-hovinds-dissertation-for-doctor-of-philosophy-in-christian-education-full-text/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Patriot University has stated that they were tricked into releasing the thesis by people claiming to be supporters, claiming the work was not a final copy, and that they do not release final copies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.patriotuniversity.com/PriceOfTruth3.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hovind has been criticized by fellow Young Earth Creationists for supposedly using arguments that are unsound both Biblically and scientifically.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wieland, Carl, Ham, Ken, and Sarfati, Jonathan, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2571/ Maintaining Creationist Integrity] October 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He is currently serving a ten-year term in U.S. federal prison for 58 tax offenses, obstructing federal agents and related charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''&amp;quot;10 years for 'Dr. Dino'&amp;quot;'', Michael Stewart. Pensacola News Journal, 19 January 19, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Hovind has maintained that, as provided in U.S. law, there should have been no taxes because he runs a home-based religious organization. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hovind, with his son Eric Hovind, had released a set of videos titled &amp;quot;Answering the Critics&amp;quot; whereby they answered some common criticisms of themselves, usually from Internet sources.  Hovind claimed he did not want to answer all the critics because he believed many critics criticize him without wanting to get any answers from him, so it was best to ignore them and continue preaching to those who really want to listen.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Answering the Critics #1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, an atheist group known for posting Hovind-critical videos on [[YouTube]] was banned from the site due to [[DMCA]] notices sent by Creation Science Evangelism. CSE had released videos made prior to 2005 into the [[public domain]], and sending DMCA notices over public domain material is illegal. Later, Hovind requested that YouTube remove the ban on public domain material, with Hovind retaining his copyright on future videos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2007/09/dr-dino-uses-dmca-takedowns-on-critics-admits-to-mistakes.ars&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2007/09/youtube-support/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wired.com/entertainment/theweb/news/2007/09/youtube_dmca&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== $250,000 Offer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hovind is well known for his standing US$250,000 offer to anyone who can &amp;quot;prove evolution&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.drdino.com/articles.php?spec=67&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The offer has gone unclaimed.&lt;br /&gt;
Contributors at [[Talk.origins|TalkOrigins]], a pro-evolution web-site, have pointed out that Hovind's challenge includes not just biological evolution but also [[abiogenesis]], [[cosmology]] and other things, and have claimed that the challenge is worded in a way that makes it impossible to fulfill since it requires proving the negative statement that &amp;quot;evolution&amp;quot; is the only possible explanation for the existence of life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Isaak, Mark, (Ed.) [http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA341.html Claim CA341], 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External link ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.drdino.com/ Creation Science Evangelism] Official home page (DrDino.com)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foo.ca/wp/2009/12/10/kent-hovinds-dissertation-for-doctor-of-philosophy-in-christian-education-full-text/ Dissertation for Doctor of Philosophy in Christian Education] Full text of Hovind's dissertation&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.archive.org/details/KentHovind_Part1_HowOldIsTheEarth How Old Is The Earth?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hovind, Kent}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Young Earth Creationists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Andyc1984</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kent_Hovind&amp;diff=897906</id>
		<title>Kent Hovind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kent_Hovind&amp;diff=897906"/>
		<updated>2011-08-06T14:08:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Andyc1984: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:KentHovind.jpg|200px|thumb|right|Kent Hovind giving a presentation]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Dr. Kent Hovind''' (born 1953), commonly called &amp;quot;Dr. Dino&amp;quot;, is a prominent and controversial [[Young Earth Creationism|young Earth creationist]]. He founded Creation Science Evangelism in 1989&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.drdino.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and has a doctoral degree in Christian education from [[Patriot University]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2001, Hovind opened a theme park in Pensacola, Florida called Dinosaur Adventure Land, filled with exhibits explaining God's Creation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 19th 2007, Hovind was sentanced to 10 year in prison on 58 federal accounts of tax related offences, and is scheduled for release on August 11th, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
== Criticism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Karen Bartelt, a critic of Hovind, questions the quality of his doctoral thesis and the academic standards of the university from which he received it, believing both to be subpar for institutions of higher learning.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://chem.tufts.edu/science/Stear-NoAiG/no-AiG/bartelt_dissertation_on_hovind_thesis.htm Karen Bartelt, Ph.D. &amp;quot;The Dissertation Kent Hovind Doesn't Want You To Read.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2009, Hovind's thesis was leaked to the public, with the content matching Bartelt's review.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://foo.ca/wp/2009/12/10/kent-hovinds-dissertation-for-doctor-of-philosophy-in-christian-education-full-text/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Patriot University has stated that they were tricked into releasing the thesis by people claiming to be supporters, claiming the work was not a final copy, and that they do not release final copies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.patriotuniversity.com/PriceOfTruth3.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hovind has been criticized by fellow Young Earth Creationists for supposedly using arguments that are unsound both Biblically and scientifically.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wieland, Carl, Ham, Ken, and Sarfati, Jonathan, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2571/ Maintaining Creationist Integrity] October 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He is currently serving a ten-year term in U.S. federal prison for 58 tax offenses, obstructing federal agents and related charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''&amp;quot;10 years for 'Dr. Dino'&amp;quot;'', Michael Stewart. Pensacola News Journal, 19 January 19, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Hovind has maintained that, as provided in U.S. law, there should have been no taxes because he runs a home-based religious organization. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hovind, with his son Eric Hovind, had released a set of videos titled &amp;quot;Answering the Critics&amp;quot; whereby they answered some common criticisms of themselves, usually from Internet sources.  Hovind claimed he did not want to answer all the critics because he believed many critics criticize him without wanting to get any answers from him, so it was best to ignore them and continue preaching to those who really want to listen.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Answering the Critics #1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, an atheist group known for posting Hovind-critical videos on [[YouTube]] was banned from the site due to [[DMCA]] notices sent by Creation Science Evangelism. CSE had released videos made prior to 2005 into the [[public domain]], and sending DMCA notices over public domain material is illegal. Later, Hovind requested that YouTube remove the ban on public domain material, with Hovind retaining his copyright on future videos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2007/09/dr-dino-uses-dmca-takedowns-on-critics-admits-to-mistakes.ars&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2007/09/youtube-support/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wired.com/entertainment/theweb/news/2007/09/youtube_dmca&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== $250,000 Offer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hovind is well known for his standing US$250,000 offer to anyone who can &amp;quot;prove evolution&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.drdino.com/articles.php?spec=67&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The offer has gone unclaimed.&lt;br /&gt;
Contributors at [[Talk.origins|TalkOrigins]], a pro-evolution web-site, have pointed out that Hovind's challenge includes not just biological evolution but also [[abiogenesis]], [[cosmology]] and other things, and have claimed that the challenge is worded in a way that makes it impossible to fulfill since it requires proving the negative statement that &amp;quot;evolution&amp;quot; is the only possible explanation for the existence of life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Isaak, Mark, (Ed.) [http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA341.html Claim CA341], 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External link ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.drdino.com/ Creation Science Evangelism] Official home page (DrDino.com)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foo.ca/wp/2009/12/10/kent-hovinds-dissertation-for-doctor-of-philosophy-in-christian-education-full-text/ Dissertation for Doctor of Philosophy in Christian Education] Full text of Hovind's dissertation&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.archive.org/details/KentHovind_Part1_HowOldIsTheEarth How Old Is The Earth?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hovind, Kent}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Young Earth Creationists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Andyc1984</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kent_Hovind&amp;diff=897905</id>
		<title>Kent Hovind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kent_Hovind&amp;diff=897905"/>
		<updated>2011-08-06T14:07:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Andyc1984: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:KentHovind.jpg|200px|thumb|right|Kent Hovind giving a presentation]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Dr. Kent Hovind''' (born 1953), commonly called &amp;quot;Dr. Dino&amp;quot;, is a prominent and controversial [[Young Earth Creationism|young Earth creationist]]. He founded Creation Science Evangelism in 1989&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.drdino.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and has a doctoral degree in Christian education from [[Patriot University]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2001, Hovind opened a theme park in Pensacola, Florida called Dinosaur Adventure Land, filled with exhibits explaining God's Creation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 19th 2007, Hovind was sentanced to 10 year in prison on 58 federal accounts of tax related offences, and is scheduled for release on August 11th 2015&lt;br /&gt;
== Criticism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Karen Bartelt, a critic of Hovind, questions the quality of his doctoral thesis and the academic standards of the university from which he received it, believing both to be subpar for institutions of higher learning.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://chem.tufts.edu/science/Stear-NoAiG/no-AiG/bartelt_dissertation_on_hovind_thesis.htm Karen Bartelt, Ph.D. &amp;quot;The Dissertation Kent Hovind Doesn't Want You To Read.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2009, Hovind's thesis was leaked to the public, with the content matching Bartelt's review.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://foo.ca/wp/2009/12/10/kent-hovinds-dissertation-for-doctor-of-philosophy-in-christian-education-full-text/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Patriot University has stated that they were tricked into releasing the thesis by people claiming to be supporters, claiming the work was not a final copy, and that they do not release final copies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.patriotuniversity.com/PriceOfTruth3.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hovind has been criticized by fellow Young Earth Creationists for supposedly using arguments that are unsound both Biblically and scientifically.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wieland, Carl, Ham, Ken, and Sarfati, Jonathan, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2571/ Maintaining Creationist Integrity] October 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He is currently serving a ten-year term in U.S. federal prison for 58 tax offenses, obstructing federal agents and related charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''&amp;quot;10 years for 'Dr. Dino'&amp;quot;'', Michael Stewart. Pensacola News Journal, 19 January 19, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Hovind has maintained that, as provided in U.S. law, there should have been no taxes because he runs a home-based religious organization. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hovind, with his son Eric Hovind, had released a set of videos titled &amp;quot;Answering the Critics&amp;quot; whereby they answered some common criticisms of themselves, usually from Internet sources.  Hovind claimed he did not want to answer all the critics because he believed many critics criticize him without wanting to get any answers from him, so it was best to ignore them and continue preaching to those who really want to listen.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Answering the Critics #1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, an atheist group known for posting Hovind-critical videos on [[YouTube]] was banned from the site due to [[DMCA]] notices sent by Creation Science Evangelism. CSE had released videos made prior to 2005 into the [[public domain]], and sending DMCA notices over public domain material is illegal. Later, Hovind requested that YouTube remove the ban on public domain material, with Hovind retaining his copyright on future videos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2007/09/dr-dino-uses-dmca-takedowns-on-critics-admits-to-mistakes.ars&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2007/09/youtube-support/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wired.com/entertainment/theweb/news/2007/09/youtube_dmca&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== $250,000 Offer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hovind is well known for his standing US$250,000 offer to anyone who can &amp;quot;prove evolution&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.drdino.com/articles.php?spec=67&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The offer has gone unclaimed.&lt;br /&gt;
Contributors at [[Talk.origins|TalkOrigins]], a pro-evolution web-site, have pointed out that Hovind's challenge includes not just biological evolution but also [[abiogenesis]], [[cosmology]] and other things, and have claimed that the challenge is worded in a way that makes it impossible to fulfill since it requires proving the negative statement that &amp;quot;evolution&amp;quot; is the only possible explanation for the existence of life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Isaak, Mark, (Ed.) [http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA341.html Claim CA341], 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External link ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.drdino.com/ Creation Science Evangelism] Official home page (DrDino.com)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foo.ca/wp/2009/12/10/kent-hovinds-dissertation-for-doctor-of-philosophy-in-christian-education-full-text/ Dissertation for Doctor of Philosophy in Christian Education] Full text of Hovind's dissertation&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.archive.org/details/KentHovind_Part1_HowOldIsTheEarth How Old Is The Earth?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hovind, Kent}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Young Earth Creationists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Andyc1984</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>