https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Alpha69 2026-10-09T06:37:28Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Adam_Smith&diff=40977 2007-03-16T06:10:53Z

<p>Alpha69: </p> <hr /> <div>By Zeus people! whoever writes this articles? Adam Smith was NOT an economist. He was a moral philosopher, which becomes pretty obvious by the following: a) he studied philosophy, b)held a chair of philosophy, c)economics was not an independent science in his days, and d)his writings refer to individuals' moral sentiments, and how they affect personal and group behavior.<br /> Also, stating that &quot;[An inquiry into the nature and causes of] the wealth of nations was [u]his book[/u]&quot; is wrong. It is ONE of his books (true enough the most well known), but the origins of his theory can be found in his 1759 &quot;Theory of moral sentiments&quot;.<br /> AMATEURS! IGNORANT AMATEURS!!!<br /> (i won't even go into discussing the presentation of his contributions - or lack thereof.)</div>

Alpha69 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Adam_Smith&diff=40966 2007-03-16T06:07:50Z

<p>Alpha69: </p> <hr /> <div>By Zeus people! whoever writes this articles? Adam Smith was NOT an economist. He was a moral philosopher, which becomes pretty obvious by the following: a) he studied philosophy, b)held a chair of philosophy, c)economics was not an independent science in his days, and d)his writings refer to individuals' moral sentiments, and how they affect personal and group behavior.<br /> Also, stating that &quot;[An inquiry into the nature and causes of] the wealth of nations was [u]his book[/u]&quot; is wrong. It is ONE of his books (true enough the most well known), but the origins of his theory can be found in his 1759 &quot;Theory of moral sentiments&quot;.<br /> AMATEURS! IGNORANT AMATEURS!!!</div>

Alpha69