https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Alexbiel 2026-10-11T10:52:25Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Epistemology&diff=215422 2007-07-02T13:00:47Z

<p>Alexbiel: Clarification</p> <hr /> <div>The analysis of the nature of knowledge, how we know, what we can and cannot know, and how we can know that there are things we know we cannot know.<br /> <br /> Different to certain [[liberal]] approaches, ''conservative epistemology'' does not focus on the examination of [[reality]] to gain knowledge, but rather to remove the [[liberalism|liberal]] aspects of reality to show its true [[conservative]] nature.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Philosophy]]</div>

Alexbiel https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Reality&diff=215419 2007-07-02T12:57:06Z

<p>Alexbiel: reality bias</p> <hr /> <div>'''Reality''' is something that is really true. <br /> Reality is mind-independent, i.e. reality would continue to be the case whether or not anyone believed it, or indeed whether or not there were any minds to believe it in the first place. <br /> <br /> :&quot;That which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.&quot; -- [[Philip K. Dick]]<br /> <br /> Something is said to be &quot;a fact&quot; is, a concept, statement, thing, scientific law, or event that can been unequivocally (indisputably) proven to be true. Facts are always based on concrete verified evidence which substantiate their truth. <br /> <br /> [[M. Scott Peck]] described ''sanity'' as &quot;dedication to reality at all costs&quot;. <br /> <br /> ==Bias==<br /> <br /> In [[prima facie]], [[reality]] often appears to show a strong [[Liberalism|liberal]] bias which is due to its [[Epistemology|epistemological]] nature. It requires carefull modification of skilled journalists to exhibit the hidden [[konservative]] aspects of reality.<br /> <br /> [[category:philosophy]]</div>

Alexbiel