<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=AlaskanEconomy</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=AlaskanEconomy"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/AlaskanEconomy"/>
	<updated>2026-11-11T23:06:18Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=860849</id>
		<title>Talk:Public schools in the United States</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=860849"/>
		<updated>2011-04-09T21:36:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* Claim of dubious worth */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Looks like a few people are trying to edit this page at the same time.  Between this and my initial screw-up with providing references, I think my edit should be alright.  I'll work on some more names later.--Jimmy 14:45, 7 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh my bad. I hate it when people edit conflict me so I always try to wait, but I guess I wated too long. I'm not sure why you undid the formatting though. In general we bullet any lists because it's so much easier to read. I'll chalk it up to an edit conflict and undo it. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:12, 7 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheistic Public Schools? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Public schools are not atheistic institutions. Just because they obey the constitution and don't promote prayer, it doesn't make them atheistic. In addition, they don't promote atheism at all, they merely don't promote religion. If no one minds, I'll remove the first section from the article.--[[User:Blinkadyblink|Blinkadyblink]] 19:17, 7 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree completely. Saying that because public schools do not preach christianity means that they are &amp;quot;atheistic&amp;quot; is ridiculous. Aren't conservatives the ones who say parents should educate their children about morals, not the government? Schools should teach math, science, history, writing, art, and foreign language and leave the rest for people to decide on their own. ''That'' is limited government. --[[User:Mars2035|Mars2035]] 21:21, 18 March 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My high school had agnostic students--thought they were atheist--with many Christian/Catholic teachers. +_+ &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;always tired&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; [[User:Kektklik|Kektk]] 14:03, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Religion is censored from [[public schools]]:  there is no classroom prayer, no religious symbols, no emphasize on moral right and wrong, etc.  Sure, students may be agnostic or religious, but they better not try to say a group prayer during class time or they risk being punished.  That's an atheistic culture.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:50, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Mr Schlafly:  It is one thing to assert something and another to actually provide a reference.  Is there any chance you could provide a valid reference that states American public schools are atheistic?  In my daughter's school, students are allowed to pray during class hours, moral values are taught and emphasized during civics and other classes, and she has never seen anyone punished for praying.  The atheist tag you are placing on this article wouldn't be constantly challenged if you could provide a solid reference.  --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 16:09, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: There is no classroom prayer in any [[public school]] in the [[United States]].  Does that really need a reference?  No morals are taught either and no religious symbols are displayed.  The [[Ten Commandments]] cannot be found either.  References could be supplied for these obvious facts; indeed, you could add them yourself.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:45, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Mr. Schlafly:  Please reference my last comment.  There is obviously prayer allowed and morals taught at my daughter's PUBLIC SCHOOL which is in AMERICA so you are wrong about asserting, without evidence, that prayer in public schools is prohibited in America.  And yes, your assertion needs a reference because it flies in the face of every statement issued by the Clinton and Bush administrations concerning prayer in public schools.  This is even mentioned in the article.  I even posted other evidence concerning the opinions of many civil liberties groups and their support of the constitutional right of students to pray in public school but you declared that edit was 'liberal' and deleted it.  Now if you want to insist that both Clinton and Bush are completely wrong and the advice they got from their legal advisors is completely without merit, please post a valid reference that disputes the opinions of our country's leaders and legal experts.  I don't have the slightest clue where I would find a reference that supports what you are claiming or I would gladly assist.  Please provide the reference to your assertion so we can all lay this matter to rest. --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 17:50, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article states that public schools are &amp;quot;atheistic,&amp;quot; and atheism is defined by this encyclopedia as the denial of the existence of God. I don't mean to get overly technical here, but it seems illogical that a broadly defined institution such as American public schools could be said to deny the existence of God, unless there has been some statement (or a rash of statements) that I am not aware of (and is not cited) on behalf of public schools specifically denying that God exists. The thrust of this article seems to be not that public schools are atheistic but that they are Godless institutions, lacking in the moral fundamentals of religion and defining themselves as expressly secular. Therefore, I am changing &amp;quot;atheistic&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Godless&amp;quot; in the header.  [[User:Kristkrispies|Kristkrispies]] 12:43, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Public schools are not &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot;, which means reflective of society as a whole.  Rather, they are deliberately exclusive of faith, morality and religion.  &amp;quot;Godless&amp;quot; is a pejorative term, and atheistic is better because it encompasses atheistic ideologies like evolution that are taught in schools.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:11, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I suppose you're right, although &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot; is often used to mean &amp;quot;exclusive of religion.&amp;quot; Yes, &amp;quot;Godless&amp;quot; is a pejorative, but so is &amp;quot;atheistic,&amp;quot; as least as it is defined in this encyclopedia. I also contest that evolution is an (exclusively) atheistic ideology, as many scientists who believe in evolution are theists. Finally, do you have any citations to support the fact that public schools specifically deny the existence of God, or are you using &amp;quot;atheistic&amp;quot; more as a catch-all to describe the godless mindset in general (and, if so, I'd like a better definition of the term). [[User:Kristkrispies|Kristkrispies]] 13:34, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: There may or may not be theistic evolutionists, but evolution is predominantly an atheistic ideology.   Ditto for other things taught in public school, such as materialism.  Schools are not merely &amp;quot;godless&amp;quot;, as they exclude teaching of &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot;.  The term &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot; is misused to mean &amp;quot;exclusive of religion.&amp;quot;  That is not its actual meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:42, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Sorry, just one more point here, regarding the definition of &amp;quot;secular:&amp;quot; according to dictionary.com, which may not be the best source, the first 3 definitions specifically mean &amp;quot;non-religious&amp;quot; and there is no definition given for &amp;quot;reflective of a society as a whole.&amp;quot; [[User:Kristkrispies|Kristkrispies]] 14:13, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: I just checked Merriam-Webster and ''none'' of the definitions mean &amp;quot;non-religious.&amp;quot; [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/secular]--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:02, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: As usual, I hate to differ with you, but 'I' just checked Merriam-Webster, and the first two definitions say &amp;quot;non-religious.&amp;quot; [[User:Kristkrispies|Kristkrispies]] 20:01, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: My cite doesn't.  One of the definitions does say not ''specifically'' religious, as in denominational.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:23, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::: Not to beat a dead horse, BUT the definition I'm seeing on Merriam-Webster.com says this: &amp;quot;1 a: of or relating to the worldly or temporal &amp;lt;secular concerns&amp;gt; b: not overtly or specifically religious &amp;lt;secular music&amp;gt; c: not ecclesiastical or clerical &amp;lt;secular courts&amp;gt; &amp;lt;secular landowners&amp;gt;&amp;quot; thus clearly defining secular as equivalent to nonreligious or nonspiritual. The next definition gets at more of the nondenominational meaning, but I don't see how you can say that this does not mean nonreligious. Furthermore, a search on Merriam-Webster's Thesaurus defines &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot; to mean &amp;quot;not involving religion or religious matters &amp;lt;that's an issue for the secular authorities, not the church&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. On the other hand, I have not seen a single dictionary support your definition of secular as &amp;quot;reflective of society as a whole.&amp;quot; [[User:Kristkrispies|Kristkrispies]] 23:51, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think &amp;quot;non-religious&amp;quot; is a better term.[[User:JPohl|JPohl]] 13:51, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;Non-religious&amp;quot; does not capture the hostility, such as the affirmative censorship of prayer.  A group may be non-religious and still allow, and even welcome, an occasional prayer.  But an atheistic culture censors the occasional group prayer, as public schools do.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:54, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think this is a good point, but what I want to know is why you want to characterize hostility toward religion on the part of public schools (an unsourced pejorative), yet you won't use &amp;quot;godless&amp;quot; on the grounds that it is pejorative. Also, I was hoping for an answer to the other concerns I brought up, and if I may add one more to that: you say that &amp;quot;Schools are not merely godless, as they exclude teaching of right and wrong,&amp;quot; but don't you think that being godless inherently suggests the lack of morality, in the same way that atheism does? Again, you need to cite some sources to describe this broader atheistic lifestyle you seem to be describing. [[User:Kristkrispies|Kristkrispies]] 14:06, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As I've said before (I think, but I'm too lazy to check), I'd prefer &amp;quot;nontheistic&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;atheistic.&amp;quot;  Usual disclaimers apply. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 22:16, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: [[Public schools]] are hostile to more than [[God]], such as right and wrong, and promote (false) ideologies that lead students to [[atheism]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:37, 11 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There not so much Atheistic as they are anti-Christian. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 23:40, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It is very obvious that you and whoever wrote this article has never set foot in a public school with competent staff. I am a high school senior and we have a moment of silence every day. The majority of my teachers are Christians, and although they do not press their beliefs on anyone, they certainly make it known.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::My biology teacher frequently emphasizes the fact that evolution can coexist with the teachings of the three mainstream religions. He presents evolution as a fact (because...I'm sorry, but it is one. We're in the 21st century now, guys) but does not discount panspermia (the belief that life came from another planet) or intelligent design. He is a Christian, but does not bias his information one way or the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::In my Theory of Knowledge class, the liberals, conservatives, Christians, Hindus, and atheists openly debate the definition and roots of ethics, morality, and religion. Sometimes we reach a conclusion leaning towards atheism, sometimes we reach one leaning towards Christianity. But the point is, we are presented the facts and we debate, discuss, research, and discover the roots, impacts, and issues of many ethical paradoxes and religious issues. The teacher provides input, but only to clarify and guide us in the direction of the class standards. I've learned more about what is right and wrong through arguments in that class than I have in any religious service. I've won debates and been viciously proven wrong, but at the end of the day we're all classmates who joke about it later, because unlike so many people, we have an open enough mind to throw our opinions out there and see if they stand the tests of debate and scrutiny.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Not that anything on this site is remotely correct (I thought this site was a joke when I read the Obama &amp;quot;article&amp;quot;...it still could be for all I know), but public education is something I just gotta take a stand on. No one knows better than someone who's been through 11.5 years of it. And if anyone's wondering, I live in the conservative state of SC, smack dab in the middle of the Bible Belt. So don't tell me my surroundings influence my opinions, because they don't. I know this comment (or parts of it) will be deleted/altered shortly after it is posted (because I don't agree with you...very fair, I know), but I hope at least one diehard conservative reads this and realizes that not every issue can be defended from his upper-middle class white Christian Hummer-driving viewpoint. If anyone would like to discuss my contribution further on an unbiased, uncensored, free medium, my AIM name is kevh89 and my e-mail address is Nivek_04085@yahoo.com. So much for access to Conservapedia, because like a dissenter in communist Russia, I will probably be exiled from the IP for disagreeing. I'll just have to log in on a friends' computer for my daily laughs. This &amp;quot;encyclopedia&amp;quot; is an insult to education. [[User:Frogmaster13|Frogmaster13]] 21:58, 15 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel the need to point out that the reason prayer and whatnot are not used in public schools is because the United States Law ensures freedom of religion and separation of church and state, which is meant to advance this end. Not all public school students are Christian. Many are atheist, agnostic, or some other religion that does not have the same rituals (specifically, praying to God) as Christianity. Not only would prayer and whatnot in public schools be illegal, it would be unfair to all of the young Americans who are non-Christian. That is my interpretation. [[User:Luminite2|Luminite2]] 23:05, 9 April 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm a religious person, devout in my faith, but I don't think that prayer should be allowed.  For my faith or any other, do you know why?  No one is of the same religion.  I had a buddy, an Atheist, go to a school.  A public school.  When people found out he wasn't Christian, they tried to beat him up int he name of Jesus Christ.  My children will be raised in my faith, a pagan faith.  We are small in number, and as your site suggests, very good people.  But with people out there that would attack my future children for not being of the same faith, why would I want to bring that upon them?  Also, I'm a moderate, I'd actually consider myself to be moderate-conservative, but I had outrageous conservative views *pushed* upon me at my school.  Not liberal views.  Conservative.  I had a teacher tell the students not to vote for Kerry because he supported gay rights.  And why do schools need to teach morals?  Teach right and wrong?  Isn't that why parents exist?  I'll teach my kids morals.  I'll teach them what I believe to be right and wrong.  I don't need some teacher telling them right and wrong.  That isn't their job.  To me, this article makes it sound like conservatives want to be lazy and have schools do all of their parenting work for them. - JaffaLycosa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Liberals believe in free speech for their views, but not for conservative ones.  Public schools have liberal speech ad nauseum.  It's tyranny to censor prayer and other conservative speech in public schools.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:47, 9 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I believe in free speech for everyone.  My school, conservatives were beating up liberals for their liberal views.  I was in a public school my whole life (fortunately, my parents weren't rich enough to put me in a private school).  Liberals cut off conservatives and conservatives cut off liberals.  Neither one of them are better than the other.  But all of these comments are garbage.  Because Jesus isn't pushed onto me at school is why I have a lower vocabulary?  You really think religion has anything to do with lower grades?  And why just Christianity?  Do you really think that my children deserve to have a religion forced upon them at a public school?  I thought this was a free country?  Free of religion.  You're acting like this country should be freedom of religion for Christians and nothing else.  I don't want my kids learning from the Ten Commandments at school.  So tell me, if Christianity should be allowed back in school, should teaching my religion be allowed as well? - JaffaLycosa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You don't believe in meaningful free speech if you insist on censoring classroom prayer.  Your claims about people beating each other up is just a liberal way to justify censorship of conservative speech in school.  Even if that were your criterion, there's a lot more &amp;quot;beating up&amp;quot; done in the absence of classroom prayer.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:35, 9 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Oh, I believe in Freedom of Speech.  And also, my 'claims' aren't a 'liberal way'.  These aren't conservative views you're throwing here, they are hateful Christian views.  I don't care if people pray in school, I'm talking about organized prayer.  When you have &amp;quot;prayer time&amp;quot; and not everyone believes in praying, it makes those people outcasts.  It's not a good thing.  If a group of kids want to go pray to their god during lunch time, that's fine by me.  Go right ahead and more power to you.  It happened in my school and people didn't get into trouble.  But I'm talking about when prayer time is set aside in the classroom in the school.  It's a public school, prayer is a religious thing.  Religion, mine or yours or in general, doesn't need to be forced on anyone.  I'm sure you can agree to that. -JaffaLycosa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::While I do not believe that teachers should influence students on any single religion (religion is a fascinating thing and I believe all major religions should be taught, and equally at that), I also don't see any problem with students praying in school, or even teachers (as long as they don't force a student to pray). Another thing is that sports coaches in high school should be allowed to lead their players in a prayer before going out to a game. If the player isn't religious, or not Christian, or whatever, no harm done. They don't have to participate. I'm new here and I don't mean to offend or anything, just sharing my opinion. I apologize if its been stated already. [[User:CeruleanFalls|SarahH]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I agree with that, Sarah.  Prayer was allowed in my school, just not organized prayer.  From what I can tell, that's how the law states.  No one was in trouble when they prayed.  It was when they forced their beliefs that the trouble came.  That's why I don't understand this.  In fact, my school, a public school, had a religious studies class.  It studied religions.  That would make it not an atheist school.  Also, don't say major religions.  There are minor religions out there too.  Don't play favorites here.  -JaffaLycosa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::JaffaLycosa, I can't tell if you're unaware of how liberals censor prayer in public schools, or if you're aware but in denial.  In public schools, there cannot be a classroom prayer ever, under any circumstance.  A coach cannot participate in a prayer with players.  Do you support this censorship, or not?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:41, 9 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Andy, I don't support censorship much at all to be honest.  If people want to pray, more power to them.  Having an organized &amp;quot;prayer time&amp;quot; I don't agree is a good idea.  If students want to pray, let them.  Don't let them force their beliefs on others, however.  Same with teachers.  After 9/11, I took part in a prayer circle on my school grounds.  Although it was Christian oriented, I still took part out of respect for those that died.  No one got into trouble for it.  I don't see this total attack against prayer.  All I've seen is an attack against organized prayer.  Now, if you want to have a time set aside during the day for &amp;quot;self reflection&amp;quot; and people want to pray during that time, that's fine.  I don't even care if there are religious groups involved at school, as long as all religions are allowed to be represented and even non-theists and atheists are allowed to have groups.  I pray to my gods, Andy, trust me.  I don't think that praying is bad at all, but we have to go about it in an intelligent way.  The last thing schools need is a religious war in their halls.  And on that note, I think that teaching religion in schools is a good idea.  A class enveloping all of the religions to teach respect for one another, which to me, is the American way.  I may be &amp;quot;pagan&amp;quot; Andy, but I'm not hateful towards Christians in the slightest nor do I wish for their religious views and beliefs to be stamped out, even in schools.  --  JaffaLycosa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::JaffaLycosa, the students want to start the class with a prayer, and the teacher wants to participate.  '''This is illegal in public schools'''.  The football players want to say a prayer before taking the field, and the coach wants to join them.  '''This is illegal in public schools'''.  Do you support that ban, or not?  Please state your position first, and only afterward is it productive to discuss your reasons.  This isn't rocket science, and I'll move on to other discussions if your position still remains unclear.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:03, 9 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Its pretty clear to me that Jaffa has already stated that he/she (not sure if male or female) agrees that teachers and high school sports team coaches should be allowed to pray if they want to, as Jaffa stated they agree with me when I said that. I am unclear as to whether there is an actual ban in place stating teachers/coaches can under no circumstances participate in prayers in public schools. Could you cite a specific law or policy which prevents teachers/coaches from participating in prayer organized by the students/players, Mr. Schlafly? I'd be very interested in seeing what is in place, exactly. Thank you. [[User:CeruleanFalls|SarahH]] 14:33, 9 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::If it weren't rocket science, Andy, then you'd have came to the same conclusion Sarah just did.  I don't care if students and teachers want to pray.  As long as they don't shove their beliefs on others, as long as they don't act like someone is wrong because they don't participate in the same prayer, I don't care.  But I want to know, Andy, would you mind if the teacher started a pagan prayer with the class?  If you heard about a teacher that prayed a pagan prayer with some pagan students, how would you react?  Please be honest, I'd like to know your stance on teachers and students taking part in organized non-Christian/Jewish/Islam prayers.  But to answer your question clearly, I'm not against it.  As I said, I took part in a '''Christian''' prayer with both '''students''' and '''teachers''' involved while a pagan.  If people want to pray, let them.  Just don't beat people up or treat them like crap if they don't.  Also, I'm a guy.  -  JaffaLycosa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::How'd I know you weren't going to answer that question? - JaffaLycosa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::You probably knew because I already said &amp;quot;I'll move on to other discussions if your position still remains unclear.&amp;quot;  Also, 100% of your edits have been talk, talk, talk, in violation of our [[90/10 Rule]].  Unlike Wikipedia, we help students and others here and nonstop talk doesn't advance that goal.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:25, 10 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uncited Assertions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to see evidence for the assertion that public schools are atheistic and spoken prayer is forbidden in the classroom.  The idea that this should be present without a reference goes against the standards of this encyclopedia.--Jimmy 13:56, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Then go ahead and help find it.  If I can find such references within the time it takes you to complain about the lack of them, then you can find them as well and help contribute to the building of this encyclopedia.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:06, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::It is my understanding that the person making the claim needs to provide the source documentation.  For the record, I do not know of any reputable source that claims the American public school system is atheistic.  Nor do I know of any law or court decision that prohibits all spoken prayer in the classroom, hence my request for a citation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Just so you know, I am contributing to the building of this encyclopedia.  In the time I have taken to voice my objection to the lack of sources, have you come up with your own references?--Jimmy 15:26, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes I have.  I've known for years that school prayer was removed from the schools as a result of an atheistic loudmouth named Madalyn Murray O'Hair, who used her son to force her religious beliefs through the Supreme Court in 1962.  The account was also written in the book &amp;quot;Let Us Pray&amp;quot;, by William Murray, an evangelical pastor who was O'Hair's tool back then.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Whining about lack of references does not build up this encyclopedia; helping out to fill in the missing holes does, and I expect you to do so.  You don't know because you never bothered to look; you sat there and expected everyone else to do it for you. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:58, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Prayer has not been removed from public schools and anyone that thinks this is the case is seriously misinformed.  O'Hair's lawsuit, ''Murray v. Curlett'', (consolidated with ''Abington Township School District v. Schempp'') declared school sponsored Bible reading in public schools in the United States to be unconstitutional.  The key words here are 'school sponsored'.  Students are allowed to pray as long as it is initiated by them and does not interfere with classes or instruction.  Please reference this court ruling and the additional references I included in the article concerning the opinions of the Clinton and Bush administrations position on public school prayer.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You are referring to my requests for documentation as 'whining'.  Yet all I am trying to do is follow the commandments and guidelines of this encyclopedia.  This is Conservapedia, an organization where the article writers must provide documentation for their articles.  This is not Wikipedia where everyone is entitled to their own opinion without providing references.  What is wrong with insisting that everyone follow the rules and guidelines?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm sure that you noticed that the vast majority of this article has been written by me.  Every word I have written is backed-up by references as required by the commandments.  Yet this doesn't seem to satisfy you, why not?  I've put a significant amount of time into this article and when someone makes an unreferenced assertion, I would like them to provide the same type of references that I am required to.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::If you have an addition to this article or a source that can back-up what is already written, then please contribute your efforts.  Where this article is concerned, all you have done is complain when someone is trying to make valid contributions. --Jimmy 16:28, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Jimmy, sources are readily available on the internet, or simply ask someone who goes to public school, or teaches there.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:36, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::If the sources are readily available, then they should be listed with the article.  A person reading the article shouldn't have to do their own research when the article writer is required to provide a reference.--Jimmy 16:53, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I think this represents one of the biggest problems I've identified with site in that it is built upside down. Most articles seem to start with conclusions (public schools are bad, atheism is bad, Obama is a Muslim) and then looks for evidence to support these conclusions. If no evidence is found, the statements are usually just left. An encylopedia should look at the evidence first, then see which conclusions can be drawn from it.--[[User:RonAbdul|RonAbdul]] 10:24, 4 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Provide your best specific example and let's look at it.  The &amp;quot;biggest problem&amp;quot; with the detractors, with all due respect, is a lack of an open mind.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:31, 4 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::: Well, I've been trying to draw your attention to the problems with the Tone Section in the Obama article, which I tried to address on the Obama talk page.--[[User:RonAbdul|RonAbdul]] 15:33, 4 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mandatory / Teacher-lead / Spoken Prayers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry if there was some sort of misunderstanding, but I wasn't aware that all spoken prayer is banned in public schools... would a student making a simple prayer (at a practical time) really be punished for doing so? Perhaps I'm missing another sort of prayer, other than teacher-led, that is also banned? I was just trying to clarify what is actually &amp;quot;forbidden&amp;quot; and where these lines are drawn in most public schools. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 16:06, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Yes, it is banned.  Surely you know someone who goes to public school, or teaches there????  Anyone, teacher or student, who tries to lead a prayer in school is likely to be disciplined and have that go on his record.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:34, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I know people that go to and teach at public schools and prayer is allowed many times during the day, even during class time as long as it does not interfere with instruction.  Yet the article states: ''''Spoken prayer … are expressly forbidden in public schools classrooms during school hours, and teaching of morality is implicitly disfavored.''''  I would like to see a reference that supports that sentence, it seems to be at odds with what I observe and current legal reasoning.--Jimmy 16:50, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah, yes, I see what you mean Andy... sorry, I didn't mean to overemphasize who it was leading the prayer. In public schools, essentially any prayer beyond individual, inconspicuous prayer on one's own time is banned or strongly discouraged. Perhaps instead of &amp;quot;spoken prayer&amp;quot;... &amp;quot;group prayer&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;collective prayer&amp;quot; might more accurately denote this situation? I'm not sure, the current term seemed a bit confusing - but that might just be me. Anyway, clarify it if you like, thanks for explaining. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 20:34, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Why were my edits reverted?  I've been asking for a reference for the school prayer comments at the top of the page for a while and none were provided.  The comment about prominent Americans not attending public schools since 1962 was deleted because I felt it was a little odd to have that sentence there when it is obvious that it was not true.--Jimmy 13:21, 4 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: The list shows that the only prominent Americans were educated before 1962, and there is no disputing the observation about prayer being banned at public schools, along with the Ten Commandments.  You can easily find cites for that if that were your goal.  Deleting factual information for liberal reasons is allowed at Wikipedia, but not here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:24, 4 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::There are two lists of prominent Americans educated in public schools.  The second list provides the names of fifteen that were educated after 1962 so why are you insisting that there aren't any prominent Americans educated after 1962?  I am disputing your observation concerning public school prayer because according to George W. Bush and the Department of Education, you are wrong, and Bush is far from being a liberal.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I can't find any cites to support your conclusions about public school prayer; that is why I want you to provide them.  If they exist, please show me where, according to the commandments it is your responsibility to do so.  Since Conservapedia is supposed to be &amp;quot;The Trustworthy Encyclopedia&amp;quot;, I feel that references should be provided for every alleged fact presented in its pages.  I don't see how that has a liberal stance, facts are facts.--Jimmy 13:40, 4 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Um, last time I checked, only teacher led/mandatory prayer in schools was banned. Students/Teachers can pray, however, they can't be disruptive to the class or make others pray that don't want to. Anyways, then there is the matter of which religion's prayers/worship style should be used. That would show favoritism to one religion and annoy other people who get offended. This leads to either having the class do prayers, etc.. of every religion or not having any prayer mandatory. The first option is infeasible because it would detract from time that could be used to learn subject material. So that is why teacher led/mandatory prayer isn't allowed in public schools. Willing individuals can pray together, however it must not be a distraction to a class. This is my two cents.[[User:JudgeKing|JudgeKing]] 13:00, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unjustified Edits ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Schlafly:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is just getting worse.  Your reference to the prohibition of the Ten Commandments in public schools is a reference to another Conservapedia article which itself doesn't have a reference.  How is that suppose to work?  And this reference has nothing to do with the alleged prohibition of spoken prayer or teaching of morality.  I'll ask again, can you provide valid references for the following opinions you have made; spoken prayer is prohibited in public schools, school prayer was banned in 1962, and the teaching of morality is disfavored?  According to the commandments of this encyclopedia, you are not providing the proper documentation for most of your opinions expressed in this article and yet I get the feeling you wouldn't tolerate unreferenced edits from me.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Changing the heading of the second list of Americans that attended public schools doesn't make sense.  Of the fifteen people listed, only three can be considered 'celebrities'.  The rest are prominent business men, astronauts, politicians, an aviator and a soldier.  Since only 20% of the people listed are celebrities, how does that add up to 'mostly celebrity'?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I get the feeling that I am going to be blocked soon.  I was warned once before about not insisting on people following the rules of this encyclopedia and that I should be expected to look up the references for other people's opinions even if I didn't think they were valid.  I hope I'll be able to make contributions to this website.--Jimmy 20:38, 4 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not quite yet, but I reverted your last edit here. If you feel that schools are teaching morality, reversing the wording of one sentence isn't helping the article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can you write a few sentences on [[Morality in public schools]], please? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:22, 5 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I would like to write a section about morality in public schools, but what good would it do.  The second sentence of this article claims, without providing any evidence whatsoever, that student prayer in public schools is prohibited and morality implicitly disfavored.  It doesn't matter that I provided plenty of evidence that this assertion is completely without basis.  Unless the second sentence is changed to reflect reality, this article will always look goofy.  The latest reference that Aschlafly supplied actually shows prayer is allowed at public schools.  I quote from the reference, &amp;quot;'''It ended in the spring of 2006 when the Knox County School Board promised in writing to allow students &amp;quot;religious expression&amp;quot; during &amp;quot;discretionary time'''.&amp;quot;  Far from demonstrating that public schools are forbidding prayer, this reference makes it clear that if students are denied the right to pray during non-instructional times, they always have someone that will fight for them and restore their rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Look at the edits I made earlier that were reverted.  Notice how many times 'atheistic' was replaced with 'secular' before it wasn't reverted.  A list showing a broad coalition of civil liberties groups supporting public school prayer was removed for being 'liberal'.  I've had no luck removing the 'disclaimer' about prominent Americans being educated in public schools.  It still states prayer is banned and no 'prominent Americans' have been educated in public schools even though I have demonstrated otherwise.  I've made continuous requests for references to support the opinions expressed in the second sentence of this article only to be ignored and threatened.  Will you offer any assurance that what I write will not be summarily dismissed?  I'd hate to waste my time.--Jimmy 00:07, 6 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference List ==&lt;br /&gt;
Something happened to the reference list after my last edit.  --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 11:33, 5 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;#42;points to #25 and #26&amp;amp;#42; +_+ &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;always tired&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; [[User:Kektklik|Kektk]] 17:33, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Drop out rates==&lt;br /&gt;
It's worse in some districts. Less than 25% of students in Detroit graduate. That is one big reason why I am working on getting certified to teach in the inner city - the need is so great. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 17:40, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: God bless you for doing that, Dan.  If I could hold classroom prayer to start the class with those kids and get rid of the liberal ideology, I could double that graduation rate.  But the liberals won't allow it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:42, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Actually, it's probably because the No Child Left Behind Act. The NCLBA forces teachers to teach to the test instead of the subject matter. Schools that don't meet the requirements loose funding and find themselves in financial holes that are kind of hard to get out of (that was an understatement). It also forces schools to reduce funding in the science arts in favor of basic skills. While the basic skills are important, the sciences and arts are absolutely paramount to society. Anyways, the government as a whole must take the blame for this because of the negative effects. [[User:JudgeKing|JudgeKing]] 13:13, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political Correctness as a Hindering Factor==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's frequently noted that private schools tend to do better than public schools, and that other countries (India, China, and so forth) are turning out more and better-equipped scientists and engineers than America at present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that there's a common factor: none of those educational environments are guided by the notion that every student has equal ability, and that if we just try really hard, every student can achieve at the same level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bluntly: that notion is political correctness, and it's a tremendous handicap for several reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, it makes it all but impossible to hold students accountable for their own education.  Social promotion ensures that students who make no effort continue to be passed on to higher grades.  While in school, they face essentially no consequences for lack of effort; the consequences only catch up with them when they get out into the real world and discover that they're woefully unqualified for any job.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, the one-size-fits-all approach to education hurts both gifted and non-gifted students in the name of &amp;quot;not labeling.&amp;quot;  Modern educational theory insists that students at all levels of ability need to be taught in the same classroom at the same time, resulting in a Catch-22.  Either the teacher can teach at the level of the lowest students in the class--ensuring that the rest of the class will be bored stiff and receive little useful information--or at a higher level, ensuring that the struggling students will be lost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is hand-waved with bland optimism and buzzwords like &amp;quot;differentiated instruction.&amp;quot;  There's only so much differentiation you can do in forty minutes, though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Why'' is it wrong to suggest that working with a group of students who are at roughly the same level will enable lessons to be tailored to that level?  Why is it wrong to suggest that students who excel in English, in science, or in mathematics be given the chance to excel and to push beyond the baseline curriculum?  ''That'' is how other countries produce better-educated engineers and scientists: they don't try to educate everyone to the same level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apologies for the rant, but as a teacher in a public school myself, I'm frequently frustrated by having my hands tied.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 20:30, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A suggestion about references ==&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. DeanS:  The references for the claim that public schools are atheistic are downright embarrassing.  The first reference deals with Kennedy's assertion that public schools are atheistic; no need for him to give any evidence, just blah, blah, blah.  The second reference is from WND, that by itself is bad enough, but after taking 30 seconds to read the article, I actually laughed out loud for a few seconds.  I don't quite understand, the reference says the school is allowing football players to pray as a group, and this is your evidence that public schools are atheistic?  I thought public school students weren't allowed to pray in public schools?  That is the completely unsupported claim made by one of the editors of this article.  Yet you posted a reference that stated kids are allowed to pray?  The third reference actually said students have the right to pray during discretionary time.  It stated at the beginning of the article, ''&amp;quot;It ended in the spring of 2006 when the Knox County School Board promised in writing to allow students &amp;quot;religious expression&amp;quot; during &amp;quot;discretionary time.&amp;quot;''  And you insist on saying this is a quality reference for your assertion that public schools are atheistic?  Please give me a break.  You can do much better than that.  If your claim can actually be supported that is.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article is a complete piece of junk because it has so many contradicting claims.  Every claim that public schools are atheistic or doesn't teach morals is backed up with lousy references that don't support the claim while the entries I wrote used reliable references.  Is there any chance this article can be edited to reflect reality?  I realize some people just can't grasp the concept that students in America's secular public schools are allowed to pray, out loud, even during classes, and are allowed to read the Ten Commandments, etc.  I know this because this is what happens at every public school my children have attended and this is what our current president even says.  Now if you want to claim Bush doesn't know what he is talking about, go right ahead and say he is a clueless fool for insisting that public school students don't have the religious freedoms he claims.  But please post intelligent and meaningful references, if they can be found, that way this encyclopedia won't look ignorant.  --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 00:19, 11 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Jimmy, don't make emotional arguments to promote an editorial suggestion; as you say, it's embarrassing. Follow your own advice, such as, &amp;quot;You can do much better than that.  If your claim can actually be supported . . .&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:13, 30 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Uh. Jimmy's post is dated '''&amp;quot;June 11, 2008&amp;quot;'''. As you say he says, it's embarrassing. Jimmy has also been banned for all eternity more than two weeks ago. --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 19:01, 30 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Atheistic and secular==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The secularism of the US public schools promotes atheism. Let's not pretend otherwise. [[User:Human]], you do indeed [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Public_schools&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=507180 risk your editing rights] to assert otherwise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you can find support for religion in any public school, you may add that to the counterexamples section (or start such a section). But the trend is clearly toward [[Atheism]], a positive '''denial''' of the existence of [[God]], along with [[Materialism]], an explicit denial of the reality of the [[supernatural]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do not use edit summaries as a debate forum. You know better than this. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:11, 30 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''The secularism of the US public schools promotes atheism.''  This, I think may be true.  But that's a different thing from saying the schools ARE atheist.  If you take a look at the US Dept of Ed's Guidance on Constitutionally Protected Prayer in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools US Dept of Ed's Guidance on Constitutionally Protected Prayer in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools:[http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/religionandschools/prayer_guidance.html], which is the government's official word on the subject, you get a pretty good idea of the governing principals and where the line is supposed to be drawn.  (Of course, there are always school districts here and there who step over the line one way or another, usually with much fanfare in the press.  This doesn't, however, change the fact that schools are ''supposed'' to follow the guidelines set forth by the Dept of Ed.)  Some highlights:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''''The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the First Amendment requires public school officials to be neutral in their treatment of religion, showing neither favoritism toward nor hostility against religious expression such as prayer.'''''  This, I would argue, is pretty much the definition of &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot;.  It's certainly not atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Accordingly, the First Amendment '''forbids religious activity that is sponsored by the government''' but '''protects religious activity that is initiated by private individuals''', and the line between government-sponsored and privately initiated religious expression is vital to a proper understanding of the First Amendment's scope. As the Court has explained in several cases, &amp;quot;there is a crucial difference between government speech endorsing religion, which the Establishment Clause forbids, and private speech endorsing religion, which the Free Speech and Free Exercise Clauses protect.&amp;quot;'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Although the Constitution forbids public school officials from directing or favoring prayer, students do not &amp;quot;shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate,&amp;quot; and the Supreme Court has made clear that &amp;quot;private religious speech, far from being a First Amendment orphan, is as fully protected under the Free Speech Clause as secular private expression.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''&amp;quot;nothing in the Constitution ... prohibits any public school student from voluntarily praying at any time before, during, or after the school day,&amp;quot; and students may pray with fellow students during the school day on the same terms and conditions that they may engage in other conversation or speech.&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Prayer During Noninstructional Time - Students may pray when not engaged in school activities or instruction, subject to the same rules designed to prevent material disruption of the educational program that are applied to other privately initiated expressive activities. Among other things, students may read their Bibles or other scriptures, say grace before meals, and pray or study religious materials with fellow students during recess, the lunch hour, or other noninstructional time to the same extent that they may engage in nonreligious activities.'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Organized Prayer Groups and Activities - Students may organize prayer groups, religious clubs, and &amp;quot;see you at the pole&amp;quot; gatherings before school to the same extent that students are permitted to organize other non-curricular student activities groups. Such groups must be given the same access to school facilities for assembling as is given to other non-curricular groups, without discrimination because of the religious content of their expression.'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Teachers, Administrators, and other School Employees - Teachers may take part in religious activities where the overall context makes clear that they are not participating in their official capacities. Before school or during lunch, for example, teachers may meet with other teachers for prayer or Bible study to the same extent that they may engage in other conversation or nonreligious activities. Similarly, teachers may participate in their personal capacities in privately sponsored baccalaureate ceremonies.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Moments of Silence - If a school has a &amp;quot;minute of silence&amp;quot; or other quiet periods during the school day, students are free to pray silently, or not to pray, during these periods of time.'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Religious Expression and Prayer in Class Assignments - Students may express their beliefs about religion in homework, artwork, and other written and oral assignments free from discrimination based on the religious content of their submissions.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot; is the more accurate term, despite a few examples of schools which mistakenly restricted students' rights to prayer. Trends away from secularism, and so on, can be described in a paragraph later in the entry. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 17:12, 30 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;Secular&amp;quot; means: &amp;quot;1 a: of or relating to the worldly or temporal &amp;lt;secular concerns&amp;gt; b: not overtly or specifically religious &amp;lt;secular music&amp;gt; c: not ecclesiastical or clerical &amp;lt;secular courts&amp;gt; &amp;lt;secular landowners&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/secular]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: None of those definitions describes the overwhelmingly [[atheistic]] leadership and culture of [[public schools]].  Students are more likely to hear God mentioned or worshiped in an atheistic country than in a public school.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:50, 30 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nitpick: My Circular Reasoning sense is tingling: You look at a definition for &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot;, realize that it doesn't meet your assumption that the public schools are atheistic (and not secular) and then conclude that &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot; is not the right word. --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 18:57, 30 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Late comment: I'd prefer the term &amp;quot;nontheistic.&amp;quot;  &amp;quot;Atheistic&amp;quot; implies explicit denial of the existence of a higher being; &amp;quot;nontheistic&amp;quot; implies that the schools just don't address the concept. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 14:59, 16 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Removal of Section on Famous Americans ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are ''so'' many things wrong with the section on famous Americans who have attended public school. How do you define &amp;quot;attended&amp;quot;: is it graduates only, or those who have spent even a day in a public institution? How do you define &amp;quot;prominent American&amp;quot;? Politicians, musicians, artists, owners of large corporations, athletes, who counts? Also, note that the list would probably require several hundred pages, considering that virtually ever American who has a graduate-level education (GED-worthy) attended a public school, including a vast, vast majority of Americans that would be considered &amp;quot;prominent.&amp;quot; And what's up with that statistic that claims that fewer prominent Americans have come out of the public school system since prayer was banned? There is absolutely no way that a claim like that can be tested, measured, or even looked at in a serious light. I vote to delete the section entirely. And mind you I have many, many friends who graduated from the public school system who are doing just fine, which is remarkable considering that I live in Los Angeles, which has one of the highest dropout rates in the country. I remember my mother still works at a particularly prominent school in Hollywood, and at the end of each year she takes several students who graduated out to lunch to congratulate them because it's such an achievement at some schools in the city. I don't think that has anything to do with prayer though (religious children fail to graduate just as often as secular ones). -[[User:Ilikecake|Ilikecake]] 17:04, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the worst section on an even worse page. The list of post and pre 1962 section should be thousands of pages long! I'm going to delete it. I know it's going to be put back in a couple minutes though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If you already believe something will be reverted when you begin to edit, that is a good indicator not to do so. Also please remember to sign your posts. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:59, 25 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Statistics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A few comments on the recently-added statistics:&lt;br /&gt;
:*Illegal drugs: The survey that statistic comes from includes both public and private schools. (See [http://monitoringthefuture.org/purpose.html])&lt;br /&gt;
:*Teen pregnancy: The number is for one city in Virginia, and makes no distinction between public school, private school, and homeschooled teens.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Obesity: A similar comment.  The number is for one school district.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mental health: According to [http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth/chapter3/sec1.html#table3_1 this] government website, an estimated 20% of people 9-17 years old have some sort of mental disorder.  Since the source for the &amp;quot;almost 10%&amp;quot; statistic (I think it would be better just to say 8%, by the way) doesn't say what exactly it means by &amp;quot;mental health issues,&amp;quot; there's really no way to determine what the significance of the number is.  Also, that number is for one school district.  It's not enough data to say the number applies to public school students in general.&lt;br /&gt;
:Usual disclaimers apply. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 20:34, 21 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Any study that includes public and private schools is going to be 90% public school, so the private school distinction is insignificant.  If anything, private schools are better, which makes the real public school statistic ''even worse'' than reported.  The teen pregnancy statistic is for public and private schools, not homeschoolers (where teen pregnancy rates are virtually 0).  The government estimate on mental health is interesting but does not change the school statistic.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 20:57, 21 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The teen pregnancy statistic is for all teens in the relevant area - which includes homeschoolers. (You can find the data from [http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/HealthStats/stats.asp#data this page] on the VA department of health's website.  Under &amp;quot;Data Tables,&amp;quot; pick either 2007 table from the Teenage Pregnancies drop-down box.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::*No, the estimate doesn't change the school statistic; however, it does change its significance.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*You have failed to address my comments regarding the samples.  Except for the illegal drugs statistic and the government mental health statistic, all the numbers I mentioned come from samples that were relatively small and not particularly diverse; you can't just assume those statistics are equal to those for the general public school population. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 21:06, 21 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: You only challenge 4 out of the 11 points, and one of your 4 (the obesity statistic) can hardly be disputed.  Just look at how fat public school kids are.  Maybe the statistic is slightly off, but I could find 5 stories in 60 seconds decrying the obesity in public school kids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: And that illustrates the problem with your comments.  You're not showing a genuine interest in the crisis when you deny facts that you could easily confirm yourself and improve the entry with additional references.  I'm not here to persuade someone determined not to be persuaded.  I already suggest to parents that they get their kids out of public school, and yet still try to help those stuck in the system and still look for ways to improve the system for the kids.  You, however, seem determined ''not'' to help.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 21:15, 21 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Because I don't challenge all of the statistics, my criticisms can't be taken seriously?  Also, note that all I deny is that you are correctly interpreting the statistics.  Finally, you still haven't responded to my comments regarding the samples. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 21:34, 21 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Where is your proof? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why did you insert that 77% statistic into the [[public school]] article? The article provided did not say that statistic. Where is your proof?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Metzky|Metzky]] 20:42, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Note: when stating &amp;quot;article&amp;quot; I mean the conservapedia article, but when I say &amp;quot;source&amp;quot;, I mean the source that is cited.&lt;br /&gt;
:After reading the sources from the statistics, I have a major problems with what the article is claiming to have evidence of:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:1.One source says &amp;quot;In 1991, 62 percent had used illicit drugs. In 2007, the number jumped to 77 percent.&amp;quot; (it is the link with the number &amp;quot;6&amp;quot;). However, this does '''not''' mean &amp;quot;77% do illegal drugs&amp;quot;, as stated in the article. It simply means that, at one point in their life, 77% '''have done''' drugs. The difference in verb tense makes a huge difference. Note that &amp;quot;have done&amp;quot; can be anything as small as having one drink ''in their entire life'' or smoking marijuana ''once''.&lt;br /&gt;
:2.I was unable to find where the pregnancy rate of 10% came from. I read the entire article sourced for the statistic twice and was unable to find it. The only thing close to it was &amp;quot;In a school of 2,211 students, there are at least 70 girls who are soon-to-be or already mothers.&amp;quot; This indicates a pregnancy rate of 3%, not 10%. Also, the statistic of about half getting abortions is not representative of the population, as there was only a sample size of 200 from Alexandria in Virginia.&lt;br /&gt;
:3.Also, the article sourced for &amp;quot;nearly 10% have mental health problems&amp;quot; specifically states in the second paragraph: &amp;quot;8 percent had mental health issues.&amp;quot; 10% and 8% are huge differences in the world of statistics. There is no problem with stating &amp;quot;8%&amp;quot;. Also, the study was on students in a Memphis school district. This means that the statistic is unable to be extrapolated to all of American public school students. Memphis students are not representative of the entire population of students, so no such claim is possible.&lt;br /&gt;
:4.The same goes for the 35% said to be obese. (Added in after originally posted &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#237923&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:WilliamBeason|William Beason]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:WilliamBeason|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:23, 2 January 2009 (EST))&lt;br /&gt;
:5.The same error just mentioned is committed when stating &amp;quot;20% go on dangerous &amp;quot;binge drinking,&amp;quot; and 50% drink illegally&amp;quot;. The statistic cited is for ''Ottowa County'' in Michigan. (not representative of the entire population)&lt;br /&gt;
:6.An even more egregious error is committed concerning the number of students who watch more than 3 hours of television. The national average that the source refers to '''is''' public school students. The 60% statistic is for ''Memphis'' students. The 35% is the national average for public school students.&lt;br /&gt;
:7.On bullying, the source states &amp;quot;Nationally, about 160,000 students miss school daily because they fear being bullied&amp;quot;. When checking this, the source is '''completely''' wrong:&lt;br /&gt;
::*http://www.cnn.com/2007/LIVING/personal/09/06/bullies/index.html&lt;br /&gt;
::If you want a source that is not CNN, then:&lt;br /&gt;
::*http://books.google.com/books?id=D_LpPNZt3iMC&amp;amp;pg=PA461&amp;amp;lpg=PA461&amp;amp;dq=160,000+students+bully+one+day+year&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=Ycyex5n4s6&amp;amp;sig=qlrlKQNjNIOScUryWSg048NbSlE&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;resnum=8&amp;amp;ct=result&lt;br /&gt;
:In reality, it is &amp;quot;Every year more than 160,000 students report missing some school because they are afraid.&amp;quot; (added after originally posted &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#237923&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:WilliamBeason|William Beason]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:WilliamBeason|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:32, 2 January 2009 (EST)) It is not ''every day'', but at least some every year. This includes simply ''being late'' in ''one day'' the entire year.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Overall, the sources seem to be taken from where public schools are doing the '''worst''' rather than average public schools. The sample sizes are extremely small and are taken specifically from the regions where public schools are doing the worst. These are not representative of how the entire public school system is doing. The statistics have either been gravely misinterpreted or are being misconstrued on purpose by the person who wrote that part of the article. The article is very misleading.&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope this is fixed soon. &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#237923&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:WilliamBeason|William Beason]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:WilliamBeason|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:19, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: In response to point 1 above, drugs are addictive.  Very few people do drugs only once.  In response to point 2 above, please realize that boys don't get pregnant, and half of pregnant high school girls get an [[abortion]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Guys, I stopped there.  Raise the quality of your criticisms, please, if you want a response.  And pick your best criticism rather than pretending that quantity is a substitute for quality.  It isn't.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 21:47, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::That's too bad.  Numbers six and seven seem valid, if not the others.  [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 22:00, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to help paint a clear statistical picture of US public schools, I'm ready to help. I know enough math (and logic) to keep both sides honest. But I'll tell you from the start, liberals are much more likely to make math errors and to believe what they want - than conservatives. The way they treat [[John Lott]] is a case in point. Another example is how many children &amp;quot;go to bed hungry each night&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Remember, the figures do not lie, but &amp;quot;liars figure&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:45, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm guessing a good place to start would be to read the points that Andy won't. [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 22:52, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: No, Liam, a good place to start is to admit the basic errors in the criticism and take steps to prevent recurrence of more errors like them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:54, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You already said you didn't read the whole thing.  You say the first two are flawed, ok.  But you literally can't know if there are errors in the rest.  [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 22:56, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I see your point in that my second point was flawed (I can't believe I forgot to take that into account), but that '''still only''' raises the pregnancy rate to 6%. This does not allow us to make the conclusion that there is a 10% pregnancy rate in '''all public schools'''. The statistic specifically applies to the school it was taken from because ''data was only taken from that particular school''.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Let me elaborate. In statistics, there is a rule that before making a statement about a ''population'' (every person the statistic is about) that &amp;quot;the sample must be representative of the population&amp;quot;. This means that samples for the statistic have to come from '''many''' locations. If data is ''not'' taken from many locations (that are relevant to the statistic), then the statistics develop '''bias''', or when the result given is not what is true in real life.&lt;br /&gt;
::::In context of my point about the 6% pregnancy rate, this means that it is O.K. for the result to be applied to where it came from: the Memphis school. There is no bias ''when taking it in that '''specific''' context''. However, when applying it to ''the entire country'', there is bias. Well, where does it come from? There wasn't bias when applying it to the school, so what is the problem with applying it to the entire country? Let me respond to those questions by giving an example:&lt;br /&gt;
::::*&amp;quot;A recent statistic showed that 1900 of 2000 randomly polled people in Washington D.C. are liberal. This means that 95% of ''the entire country'' is liberal.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::This is obviously '''completely''' incorrect. The only thing that the statisticians can deduce from that is that 95% of people who live ''in Washington D.C.'' are liberals. No information was taken from Texas, Kentucky, New York, Maine, California, Alaska, Florida, Oklahoma, etc.. Data can only be said to represent our country if it is taken from a variety of locations.&lt;br /&gt;
::::That is why I have a problem with a variety of the statistics: these were a ''local'' studies rather than ''national'' studies (except for bullying and drugs).&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thank you for taking the time to read this.  &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#237923&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:WilliamBeason|William Beason]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:WilliamBeason|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:36, 3 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You've got the cart before the horse, William. How about helping us with a series of articles on [[statistics]]? The elementary rules you mentioned should be outlined so clearly that all you'd have to do is refer readers to the article in question. (Absent that, your comments might take on a &amp;quot;lecturing&amp;quot; tone here.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:48, 3 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Being a teacher yourself, you may know of the &amp;quot;lecture reflex&amp;quot;. I'll take you up on your offer. &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#237923&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:WilliamBeason|William Beason]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:WilliamBeason|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:00, 3 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good. In the mean time ([[average|no pun intended]]), the [[teen pregnancy]] rate would seem to be 30 to 35 percent - not 10 percent. This is calculating pregnancies per girl (up to age 19) - not some annualized rate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But advocates on both sides of a [[social issue]] have been known to magnify or minimize a problem. Read [[Darrell Huff]]'s &amp;quot;[[How to Lie with Statistics]]&amp;quot; for some tips on how to fight back. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:04, 3 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Cutting in here for a moment to address Andy's point that 77% admitting to trying it once equates to 77% doing drugs routinely because drugs are addictive. It's not that black and white. Marijuana is not addictive. MDMA is not addictive. LSD is not addictive. And I can guarantee these three make up most of a student's drug intake.--[[User:RonAbdul|RonAbdul]] 16:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Textbook CBN story==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This might fit in here or some other article as an external link.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6bARRmEpH8 CBN story on Harvard University recommending anti-Israel, anti-European textbooks]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Great point.  Please add to this entry where you think best.  Thanks and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:08, 22 August 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Statistics, Sampling and The Truth ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally the statistics given are a good picture of public schools all over America.  What is to be gained by parsing the language to weaken the statement, obfuscate it, to make it appear they have better results than they do?  Oh, wait, I forgot that liberals want to hide from obvious truths!  Public schools are mostly cesspools. That a precious few excel doesn't alter reality. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:13, 1 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Source for 10% pregnancy rate? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the statistic that 10% of public school girls get pregnant is true, it's a very powerful statement about public schools. The source given doesn't include this fact, though. Pregnancy rates are deplorably high in public schools, but I can't find any sources that put the number as high as 10%. I need help finding a source on this. [[User:ChrisGT90|ChrisGT90]] 21:56, 10 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm getting some conflicting data on this as well. [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/USTPtrends.pdf This] (PDF file) states that in 2006, the teen pregnancy rate for ALL women was 71.5 in 1,000 (~7.2%). However, [http://www.livestrong.com/article/12504-teen-pregnancy-rates-usa/ This] article states that 1/3 of girls get pregnant before the age of 20. If the latter is the case, I would say that 10% pregnancy rate is an ''under-estimation'' given that most children are in the public school system. I'm still searching, though ... -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 22:09, 10 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I found a [http://cbs2chicago.com/local/Robeson.High.School.2.1251642.html source] that puts the pregnancy rate at about 14.375% among the girls at one high school, but we need something better before we can make a statement about public schools in general, as this school is hardly a typical example. I imagine that the distribution of pregnancy rates among public schools would resemble something of an inverse bell curve: a number of public schools (primarily urban ones) would have extremely high pregnancy rates while many others (mostly suburban/rural schools) would have very low pregnancy rates. There are probably relatively few schools that fall in the middle because there are very few schools that have an equal mix of students from the cultures, environments, etc. that lead to teen pregnancy.&lt;br /&gt;
::I bet a large number of the supposed 1/3 pregnancies comes from girls that are 19, and hence out of school. Also, that statistic for all women is actually for &amp;quot;all women between 15 and 19.&amp;quot; They slid that detail in at the top of the chart where it's not very noticeable. I don't know where the CDC gets its number, but there's a huge difference between 7% of girls between 15 and 19 getting pregnant and 33% of girls being pregnant before 20. I'm more inclined to believe the 7%; that number sounds much more reasonable and other data from the study makes sense as well. The CDC, on the other hand, is the same agency that continually warned us of the dangers of the imminent swine flu pandemic... that everyone with sense knew wasn't going to happen. [[User:ChrisGT90|ChrisGT90]] 22:54, 10 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The source given in the article says that birth/abortion rates among teens in Alexandria was about 50/50. The first source that JLauttamus provided gives data for the whole nation, and puts abortion rates at 32%. Neither source mentioned public schools, so we don't have any data on that. I'm going to add a citation needed tag to the article about the pregnancy rates, and research further into abortion rates. [[User:ChrisGT90|ChrisGT90]] 15:39, 14 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::All the evidence seems to point to a percentage even higher than 10%, so I don't see why the 10% estimate would be considered unacceptable for somehow being too high.  I wouldn't expect public schools to admit to this problem or for precise data to be available.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:35, 14 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::We don't really have any evidence to point to a particular number. We have a number from a ''single'' school (and an atypical one, at that) giving us about 14%. The only piece of data that evaluates the whole nation gives us about 7%, but that's just pregnancy rates among 15-19 year olds in general, and doesn't mention schooling at all. We could technically say that &amp;quot;One public school has a pregnancy rate of over 14% among its female students,&amp;quot; but that would be kind of weaselly. We don't have any evidence from which to draw conclusions about a typical public school or public schools as a whole. [[User:ChrisGT90|ChrisGT90]] 13:34, 16 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::If no source has been provided to back up this statistic, I'll remove it on June 24th. (Two weeks after this issue was raised.) [[User:ChrisGT90|ChrisGT90]] 22:55, 19 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 30% of public schools fail to graduate from high school? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found a rather major and embarrassing error in the opening lines. The list of statistics are said to be &amp;quot;characteristics of public schools&amp;quot; when they are in fact describing their students. I edited the heading sentence before the list to reflect this, but my edits were reversed, because &amp;quot;the public schools create the students.&amp;quot; I agree that we do need to find a way to emphasize this, but the error still needs removal. Any suggestions on how to accomplish both goals while keeping everyone happy? [[User:JimAB|JimAB]] 21:19, 27 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Jim, the schools teach and train the students.  That's what the schools are paid to do, at astronomical costs.  When someone refers to &amp;quot;public schools,&amp;quot; it does not mean merely the bricks in the buildings.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:49, 27 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::To me &amp;quot;public schools&amp;quot; refers to the lessons, the students, the teachers and the rubbish that is being taught. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:00, 27 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As 'schools' it doesn't make logical sense. I'll try and fix it. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 17:05, 9 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Claim of dubious worth ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
60% of students in one region watch more than 3 hours of TV vs. 35% nation wide. Since that national population with 35% over the line is 90% public school students I think that it's safe to say the 60% number has a lot more to do with the region than public schools. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 17:36, 9 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=860848</id>
		<title>Public schools in the United States</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=860848"/>
		<updated>2011-04-09T21:33:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: swaperoo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:800px-Warning signs at CHS.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Because of violence, vandalism, and other undesirable elements, this public school has a glaring sign warning of the on-campus surveillance cameras at its parking lot entrance.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Public schools]] in the [[United States]] are [[liberal]] and [[atheistic]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.exodusmandate.org/art_exodus_from_public_schools_gets_helping_hand.htm Exodus from &amp;quot;public schools&amp;quot; gets a helping hand], Exodus Mandate, Sept 15, 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, &amp;quot;in 2005, officials at East Brunswick High School adopted a policy prohibiting representatives of the school district from participating in student-initiated prayer.&amp;quot; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=61806]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;From 2004 to 2006, a [[public school]] banned [[Bible]] study by children ... ''during recess''. A teacher complained about the use of the Bible and the principal then censored the study activity, according to a sworn statement by a teacher told to stop it.  Principal &amp;quot;Summa, having learned of a complaint by a teacher and of the students' Bible study, told fourth-grade teacher Virginia Larue to nix the group's recess meeting. ... Larue later told one of Luke's Bible study colleagues the group could no longer meet at recess.&amp;quot;[http://knoxnews.com/news/2008/jan/03/recess-bible-study-spurs-lawsuit/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Atheists]] routinely impose their views on [[public schools]], though liberals deny it.  For example, a court prohibited a moment of silence in [[Illinois]] &amp;quot;Township High School District 214 after atheist activist Rob Sherman challenged&amp;quot; it.[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-moment_of_silence_bothmay30,0,7722271.story]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
government institutions that employ 3 million people and spend $411.5 billion annually at a cost of $10,770 per student.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.edreform.com/index.cfm?fuseAction=section&amp;amp;pSectionID=15&amp;amp;cSectionID=97 Statistics about education]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Spoken [[prayer]], the [[Ten Commandments]], and sharing of [[faith]] are expressly forbidden in public schools' classrooms during school hours, and teaching of [[morality]] is implicitly disfavored.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', ''[[Stone v. Graham]]'' (1980) (excluding Ten Commandments from public school).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A public school banned [[Bible]] study by children ... ''during recess''. A teacher complained about the use of the Bible and the principal then censored the study activity, according to a sworn statement by a teacher told to stop it.  [http://knoxnews.com/news/2008/jan/03/recess-bible-study-spurs-lawsuit/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Homosexual Agenda|Homosexual indoctrination]] is common as early as elementary school in more [[liberal]] states.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.massresistance.org/media/video/brainwashing.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The failures of underperforming public schools are paradigm of [[socialism]], along with [[landfills]] and the [[Canada|Canadian]] healthcare system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are characteristics of public schools:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*30% of public school students fail to graduate from high school,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;graduate&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Only 70% of all students in public high schools graduate, and only 32% of all students leave high school qualified to attend four-year colleges.&amp;quot;[http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/ewp_03.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and more than 40% of minorities fail to graduate;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Only 71 percent of kids graduate from high school within four years, and for minorities the numbers are even worse -- 58 percent for Hispanics and 55 percent for African Americans,&amp;quot; [Bill Gates] wrote. &amp;quot;If the decline in childhood deaths [in developing countries] is one of the most positive statistics ever, these are some of the most negative.&amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/29/AR2009032901353.html?wpisrc=newsletter]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the real drop-out rate may be 50%&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/47272207.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Nearly 70% of students who leave high school unqualified to go on to four-year college.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;graduate&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*77% of students have used illicit drugs. Fatal overdoses are common but underreported; public schools are required to present [[Drug education|drug &amp;quot;education&amp;quot;]] to kids&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;According to Monitoring the Future, a study funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, illicit drug use is up among students between eighth and 12th grade. In 1991, 62 percent had used illicit drugs. In 2007, the number jumped to 77 percent. [http://www.battlecreekenquirer.com/article/20081207/NEWS08/812070305/1002] Fatal overdoses are common, although often underreported.[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B01E5DB123EF932A25750C0A9629C8B63 Reporting of a heroin overdose by 16-year-old [[public school]] student was an exception to the underreporting].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*More than 60% of public school teenagers (in one regional study) watch more than 3 hours of television a day, compared with a national average of 35%&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/dec/01/memphis-youth-make-progress-on-risky-behavior/ (study of Memphis students)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*About half of the viable pregnancies among girls attending public school end in [[abortion|abortions]] and about half end in birth. Public schools &amp;quot;[[Sex education|educate]]&amp;quot; kids about sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;There is zero shame [to [[teenage pregnancy]]],&amp;quot; the school nurse observed.[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/12/AR2008121203507.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;About 160,000 students miss school daily because they [[fear]] being [[Bully|bullied]],&amp;quot; and students viciously fight each other and post videos of it on [[YouTube|Youtube.com]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;One victim is now &amp;quot;being [[homeschooled]] at state expense.&amp;quot;[http://starbulletin.com/2008/05/18/news/story01.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*20% of students go on dangerous &amp;quot;[[binge drinking]],&amp;quot; and 50% drink illegally&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Oregon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.mlive.com/chronicle/news/index.ssf/2008/12/ottawa_co_youth_survey_surpris.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*10-20% of students become addicted to cigarettes&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Oregon&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/dec/01/memphis-youth-make-progress-on-risky-behavior/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*35% of students are overweight&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;health&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/nov/29/students-health-needs-attention/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Health screening of public schools in Memphis, Tennessee, found that nearly 10% of students have mental health problems&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;health&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
*More than 10% of public high schools have a pro-homosexual student club&lt;br /&gt;
*The majority of public school students are completely ignorant about the [[Bible]], even as [[Bible history|history]] and literature&lt;br /&gt;
*California public schools, largest in the nation, now rank at the bottom in academic achievement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/us/us_california_broken_schools/2009/06/21/227552.html High-Spending California School System Collapsing] AP, June 21, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===United States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1647, [[Massachusetts]] [[Puritans]] enacted the second law, after Scotland in 1616,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Social, Economic &amp;amp; Political Reasons for the Decline of Gaelic in Scotland [http://www.scottishhistory.com/articles/highlands/gaelic/gaelic_page1.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; establishing universal public [[school]]s in the English-speaking world to block the attempts by &amp;quot;ould deluder Satan to keepe men from the whole knowledge of the Scriptures&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Family Encyclopedia of American History'' (Reader's Digest 1975)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Each settlement larger than 50 families was required to pay a [[teacher|schoolmaster]] to teach reading, writing and religious doctrine to the [[children]] in the community. Beginning in 1670, Massachusetts provided [[taxation|tax]] funding for school maintenance. This model was then copied throughout the colonies, and even throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many children did not attend public school for the first two centuries. It was not until 1852 that Massachusetts became the first state to require attendance by students aged 6 through 16, and it was not until 1918 that all states had [[compulsory attendance]] laws. High schools did not generally exist until after the [[Civil War]], and the first American [[kindergarten]] didn't exist until 1856 in Watertown, Wisconsin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===United Kingdom===&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United Kingdom]], the term &amp;quot;public school&amp;quot; means the exact opposite of its American usage, and refers to the most expensive and prestigious ''private'' schools, such as [[Eton College]], [[Harrow]], and a few others.  The term public was used because the school was open to all public applicants, albeit ones that could afford to pay the fees.  The UK equivalent of US public schools are called state schools which provide education for free to all pupils.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first UK state school, Beverley Grammar School, was founded in 700AD.  Despite the fact that around 90% of UK children are educated at one, state schools are looked down upon and derided.  This is especially so of the 'Bog Standard Comprehensive' where images of teachers wearing stab vests and knife arches and invoked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Views on morals==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===So-called &amp;quot;character education&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to the perception that public schools have stopped teaching morality, many state education departments have or are in the process of developing &amp;quot;morality&amp;quot; that avoid good and evil, right and wrong, and instead present under the heading of &amp;quot;character&amp;quot; education.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3971/is_199910/ai_n8866284]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The lack of appreciation for right and wrong can surprise outsiders, and even school principals.  When one public school student was charged with [[felony]] [[computer crime]] for altering the grades of 20 students, the principal said, we &amp;quot;want to teach them what's right and wrong, and it's tough for some kids to catch on to the idea that changing grades is the wrong thing to do.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cw2.trb.com/news/kwgn-student-grade-felony,0,7871401.story&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The impact of the removal of morality from the [[public school]] curriculum (which is also used in private schools) is that &amp;quot;more than one in three boys (35 percent) and one-fourth of the girls (26 percent) — a total of 30 percent overall — admitted stealing from a store within the past year.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://charactercounts.org/programs/reportcard/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Prayer ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The White House announced the release of Revised Religious  Guidelines for America's Public Schools on May 29, 1998.  Within this announcement, President Clinton stated, &amp;quot;Nothing in the First Amendment converts our public schools into religion-free zones, or requires all religious expression to be left behind at the school house door.&amp;quot; --President Clinton, July 12, 1995&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ed.gov/PressReleases/05-1998/wh-0530.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003, the Education Department released the following guidelines that clarified and added requirements to Public Schools to ensure the religious rights of students.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=17550&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schools that don’t allow students to pray outside the classroom or that prohibit teachers from holding religious meetings among themselves could lose federal money, the Education Department said late last week.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The guidance reflects the Bush administration’s push to ensure that schools give teachers and students as much freedom to pray as the courts have allowed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The department makes clear that teachers cannot pray with students or attempt to shape their religious views.&lt;br /&gt;
The instructions, released by the department on Feb. 7, broadly follow the same direction given by the Clinton administration and the courts. Prayer is generally allowed provided it happens outside the class and is initiated by students, not by school officials.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The department, however, also offered some significant additions, including more details on such contentious matters as moments of silence and prayer in student assemblies. And for the first time, federal funds are tied to compliance with the guidelines. The burden is on schools to prove compliance through a yearly report.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Teaching the Bible in Public Schools ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bibleinschools.net/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (NCBCPS) provides a program for teaching the Bible in public schools. Currently, the NCBCPS's Bible curriculum has been voted into 462 school districts (over 1,900 high schools) in 38 states. Over 210,000 students have already taken this course nationwide, on the high school campus, during school hours, for credit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Educational outcomes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Declining literacy ===&lt;br /&gt;
Since the rapid expansion and liberalization of public schools after [[World War II]], students' [[literacy]] levels have dropped significantly.  While the average 14-year-old had a vocabulary of 25,000 words in 1945, the equivalent student in 2000 had a vocabulary of only 10,000 words, a severe disadvantage in an increasingly textual world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Utne Reader'' (July-August 2000), 28-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal bias in textbooks===&lt;br /&gt;
Textbooks (K-12) have been systematically analyzed in a study funded by the U.S. government.  The 1986 findings were that massive, systematic [[liberal]] bias exists, resulting in several information blackouts in four key areas of modern American life&amp;amp;mdash;marriage, religion, politics, and business.  While an actual conspiracy was then ruled out, the cause was found to be a &amp;quot;a very widespread secular and liberal mindset&amp;quot; pervading &amp;quot;the leadership in the world of education [and textbook publishing]&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; ''Censorship: Evidence of Bias in Our Children's textbooks'', [[Paul C. Vitz]], Servant Books, 1986, ISBN 0-89283-305-X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor Larry Schwikart, of the University of Dayton, wrote a book about biased textbooks. False claims common in those texts included that the founders wanted a &amp;quot;wall of separation&amp;quot; between church and state, that &amp;quot;Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation only because he needed black soldiers&amp;quot;, and that &amp;quot;Mikhail Gorbachev, not Ronald Reagan, was responsible for ending the Cold War&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.emailwire.com/release/20086-Controversial-Historian-on-the-Price-of-Business-Show.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Non-Dismissal of Tenured Teachers===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the strength of the nation's teachers' union, it is nearly impossible to fire a bad performing teacher with tenure. The process can take years and involves countless steps to even attempt. The union claims that the protections are needed against arbitrary and malicious lawsuits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New York public schools system has approximately 700 teachers accused of  insubordination to sexual misconduct. They remain in seclusion from the classroom but are paid full salaries until their cases are heard, sometimes from months to years later. All because their union contract makes it extremely difficult to fire them. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/us_rubber_rooms/2009/06/22/227959.html 700 NYC Teachers Paid to Do Nothing] AP, June 22, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pathtodismissal.JPG|center|thumb|800px| Flow chart for firing teachers in the nations second largest school district, Los Angeles Unified School district]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Graduates==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Before 1962 ===&lt;br /&gt;
Given that public schools educate about 90% of [[Americans]], it is astounding how few prominent Americans attended public school after the banning of school prayer in 1962.  Here is an impressive list of prominent Americans who attended public schools ''before'' the banning of prayer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dixonil.com/reagan/reagan2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Dixon High School, Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dwight D. Eisenhower]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/press_releases/2007/PR07_11_August_02_2007_Eisenhower_Co_Sponsor_Little_Rock.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Abilene High School in Abilene, Kansas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard M. Nixon]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/edu/836/000068632/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Fullerton and Whittier High Schools, California&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gerald Ford]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.visitgrandrapids.org/ford-facts.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Grand Rapids South High School, Michigan&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lyndon B. Johnson]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/062/000023990/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Johnson City High School, Texas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Harry S Truman]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/103truman/103visual1.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Independence High School, Missouri&lt;br /&gt;
*[[H. Ross Perot]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.famoustexans.com/rossperot.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended public schools and Texarkana Junior College, Texas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Cheney]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/598/000022532/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Natrona County High School in Casper, Wyoming.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Colin Powell]] graduated from Morris High School, NY in 1954 and received his B.A. in geology from the City College of New York in 1958 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gale.cengage.com/free_resources/bhm/bio/powell_c.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Billy Graham]] graduated from Sharon High School, NC in May 1936&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online-bibleconcordance.com/Ministers/BillyGraham.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Medved]] graduated from Palisades High School, CA &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;michaelmedved.townhall.com/About.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Wright Brothers]] attended public schools in Richmond, India and Dayton OH but did not graduate &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.kyrene.org/schools/brisas/sunda/inventor/wright/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roy Jay Glauber]], Nobel laureate, graduated from Bronx High School of Science, Bronx, NY in 1941. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/738/000138324/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frederick Reines]], Nobel laureate, attended Union Hill High School, NJ, during the late 1930's. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/052/000099752/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Oliver North]], US Army Officer, political commentator, graduated from Ockawamick High School in 1961. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://libraryoflibrary.com/E_n_c_p_d_Ollie_North.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== After 1962 ===&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a list of celebrities and others who attended public school ''after'' prayer was banned in 1962:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Brad Pitt]], actor, graduated from Kickapoo High School in Springfield, Missouri, 1981; dropped out of college.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rolemodel.net/brad_pitt.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tom Cruise]], actor, attended several public high schools including Glen Ridge High School, New Jersey during the 1970's. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/791/000022725/&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Sununu]], former one-term Senator from [[New Hampshire]], graduated from Salem High School in the 1970's.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sununu.senate.gov/biography.html&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Edwards]], former one-term Senator from [[North Carolina]] and two-time unsuccessful candidate for nomination for president, attended public school in Robbins, N.C. during the 1960's.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/newshour/vote2004/primaries/edwards_bio.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Spike Lee]], producer, actor, graduated from John Dewey High School, Brooklyn, NY.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://movies.nytimes.com/person/99175/Spike-Lee/biography&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frank Wilczek]], Nobel laureate, attended Martin Van Buren High School, Queens, NY, during the late 1960's.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/720/000140300/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laura Bush]] attended James Bowie Elementary School, San Jacinto Junior High School, and Midland Lee High School in Midland, Texas (Graduated 1964); came out in support of [[gay marriage]] and [[abortion]] in 2010.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/laura-bush-supports-gay-marriage-abortion/story?id=10629213&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Cromwell Mather]], Nobel laureate, graduated from Newton High School, Newton, NJ in 1964. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/915/000137504/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Fitzgerald Smoot]], Nobel laureate, graduated from Upper Arlington High School, Upper Arlington, OH in 1962.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/921/000137510/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hugh David Politzer]], Nobel laureate, graduated from Bronx High School of Science, Bronx, NY in 1966.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/716/000140296/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William J. Clinton]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hotsprings.org/things_to_do/historic_hotsprings/presidents_hometown.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Hot Springs High School in Arkansas in 1964, and became the only president impeached in the 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Steve Jobs]], founder of [[Apple Inc.]], graduated from Homestead High School in Cupertino, CA in 1972; his colleague, [[Steve Wozniak]], graduated from the same high school in 1968.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eminem]], a [[liberal]] [[rapper]], repeatedly failed 9th grade in public school and ultimately dropped out.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alan Colmes]], a liberal news commentator, attended public school in [[New York City]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Public school culture]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Teacher Pay]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=860847</id>
		<title>Public schools in the United States</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=860847"/>
		<updated>2011-04-09T21:27:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: Lots of pregnancies end in miscarriage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:800px-Warning signs at CHS.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Because of violence, vandalism, and other undesirable elements, this public school has a glaring sign warning of the on-campus surveillance cameras at its parking lot entrance.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Public schools]] in the [[United States]] are [[liberal]] and [[atheistic]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.exodusmandate.org/art_exodus_from_public_schools_gets_helping_hand.htm Exodus from &amp;quot;public schools&amp;quot; gets a helping hand], Exodus Mandate, Sept 15, 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, &amp;quot;in 2005, officials at East Brunswick High School adopted a policy prohibiting representatives of the school district from participating in student-initiated prayer.&amp;quot; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=61806]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;From 2004 to 2006, a [[public school]] banned [[Bible]] study by children ... ''during recess''. A teacher complained about the use of the Bible and the principal then censored the study activity, according to a sworn statement by a teacher told to stop it.  Principal &amp;quot;Summa, having learned of a complaint by a teacher and of the students' Bible study, told fourth-grade teacher Virginia Larue to nix the group's recess meeting. ... Larue later told one of Luke's Bible study colleagues the group could no longer meet at recess.&amp;quot;[http://knoxnews.com/news/2008/jan/03/recess-bible-study-spurs-lawsuit/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Atheists]] routinely impose their views on [[public schools]], though liberals deny it.  For example, a court prohibited a moment of silence in [[Illinois]] &amp;quot;Township High School District 214 after atheist activist Rob Sherman challenged&amp;quot; it.[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-moment_of_silence_bothmay30,0,7722271.story]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
government institutions that employ 3 million people and spend $411.5 billion annually at a cost of $10,770 per student.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.edreform.com/index.cfm?fuseAction=section&amp;amp;pSectionID=15&amp;amp;cSectionID=97 Statistics about education]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Spoken [[prayer]], the [[Ten Commandments]], and sharing of [[faith]] are expressly forbidden in public schools' classrooms during school hours, and teaching of [[morality]] is implicitly disfavored.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', ''[[Stone v. Graham]]'' (1980) (excluding Ten Commandments from public school).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A public school banned [[Bible]] study by children ... ''during recess''. A teacher complained about the use of the Bible and the principal then censored the study activity, according to a sworn statement by a teacher told to stop it.  [http://knoxnews.com/news/2008/jan/03/recess-bible-study-spurs-lawsuit/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Homosexual Agenda|Homosexual indoctrination]] is common as early as elementary school in more [[liberal]] states.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.massresistance.org/media/video/brainwashing.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The failures of underperforming public schools are paradigm of [[socialism]], along with [[landfills]] and the [[Canada|Canadian]] healthcare system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are characteristics of public schools:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*30% of public school students fail to graduate from high school,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;graduate&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Only 70% of all students in public high schools graduate, and only 32% of all students leave high school qualified to attend four-year colleges.&amp;quot;[http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/ewp_03.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and more than 40% of minorities fail to graduate;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Only 71 percent of kids graduate from high school within four years, and for minorities the numbers are even worse -- 58 percent for Hispanics and 55 percent for African Americans,&amp;quot; [Bill Gates] wrote. &amp;quot;If the decline in childhood deaths [in developing countries] is one of the most positive statistics ever, these are some of the most negative.&amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/29/AR2009032901353.html?wpisrc=newsletter]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the real drop-out rate may be 50%&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/47272207.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Nearly 70% of students who leave high school unqualified to go on to four-year college.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;graduate&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*77% of students have used illicit drugs. Fatal overdoses are common but underreported; public schools are required to present [[Drug education|drug &amp;quot;education&amp;quot;]] to kids&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;According to Monitoring the Future, a study funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, illicit drug use is up among students between eighth and 12th grade. In 1991, 62 percent had used illicit drugs. In 2007, the number jumped to 77 percent. [http://www.battlecreekenquirer.com/article/20081207/NEWS08/812070305/1002] Fatal overdoses are common, although often underreported.[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B01E5DB123EF932A25750C0A9629C8B63 Reporting of a heroin overdose by 16-year-old [[public school]] student was an exception to the underreporting].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*More than 60% of public school teenagers (in one regional study) watch more than 3 hours of television a day, compared with a national average of 35%&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/dec/01/memphis-youth-make-progress-on-risky-behavior/ (study of Memphis students)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*About half of the viable pregnancies among girls attending public school end in [[abortion|abortions]] and about half end in birth. Public schools &amp;quot;[[Sex education|educate]]&amp;quot; kids about sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;There is zero shame [to [[teenage pregnancy]]],&amp;quot; the school nurse observed.[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/12/AR2008121203507.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;About 160,000 students miss school daily because they [[fear]] being [[Bully|bullied]],&amp;quot; and students viciously fight each other and post videos of it on [[YouTube|Youtube.com]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;One victim is now &amp;quot;being [[homeschooled]] at state expense.&amp;quot;[http://starbulletin.com/2008/05/18/news/story01.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*20% of students go on dangerous &amp;quot;[[binge drinking]],&amp;quot; and 50% drink illegally&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Oregon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.mlive.com/chronicle/news/index.ssf/2008/12/ottawa_co_youth_survey_surpris.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*10-20% become addicted of students to cigarettes&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Oregon&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/dec/01/memphis-youth-make-progress-on-risky-behavior/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*35% of students are overweight&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;health&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/nov/29/students-health-needs-attention/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Health screening of public schools in Memphis, Tennessee, found that nearly 10% of students have mental health problems&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;health&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
*More than 10% of public high schools have a pro-homosexual student club&lt;br /&gt;
*The majority of public school students are completely ignorant about the [[Bible]], even as [[Bible history|history]] and literature&lt;br /&gt;
*California public schools, largest in the nation, now rank at the bottom in academic achievement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/us/us_california_broken_schools/2009/06/21/227552.html High-Spending California School System Collapsing] AP, June 21, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===United States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1647, [[Massachusetts]] [[Puritans]] enacted the second law, after Scotland in 1616,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Social, Economic &amp;amp; Political Reasons for the Decline of Gaelic in Scotland [http://www.scottishhistory.com/articles/highlands/gaelic/gaelic_page1.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; establishing universal public [[school]]s in the English-speaking world to block the attempts by &amp;quot;ould deluder Satan to keepe men from the whole knowledge of the Scriptures&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Family Encyclopedia of American History'' (Reader's Digest 1975)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Each settlement larger than 50 families was required to pay a [[teacher|schoolmaster]] to teach reading, writing and religious doctrine to the [[children]] in the community. Beginning in 1670, Massachusetts provided [[taxation|tax]] funding for school maintenance. This model was then copied throughout the colonies, and even throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many children did not attend public school for the first two centuries. It was not until 1852 that Massachusetts became the first state to require attendance by students aged 6 through 16, and it was not until 1918 that all states had [[compulsory attendance]] laws. High schools did not generally exist until after the [[Civil War]], and the first American [[kindergarten]] didn't exist until 1856 in Watertown, Wisconsin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===United Kingdom===&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United Kingdom]], the term &amp;quot;public school&amp;quot; means the exact opposite of its American usage, and refers to the most expensive and prestigious ''private'' schools, such as [[Eton College]], [[Harrow]], and a few others.  The term public was used because the school was open to all public applicants, albeit ones that could afford to pay the fees.  The UK equivalent of US public schools are called state schools which provide education for free to all pupils.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first UK state school, Beverley Grammar School, was founded in 700AD.  Despite the fact that around 90% of UK children are educated at one, state schools are looked down upon and derided.  This is especially so of the 'Bog Standard Comprehensive' where images of teachers wearing stab vests and knife arches and invoked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Views on morals==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===So-called &amp;quot;character education&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to the perception that public schools have stopped teaching morality, many state education departments have or are in the process of developing &amp;quot;morality&amp;quot; that avoid good and evil, right and wrong, and instead present under the heading of &amp;quot;character&amp;quot; education.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3971/is_199910/ai_n8866284]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The lack of appreciation for right and wrong can surprise outsiders, and even school principals.  When one public school student was charged with [[felony]] [[computer crime]] for altering the grades of 20 students, the principal said, we &amp;quot;want to teach them what's right and wrong, and it's tough for some kids to catch on to the idea that changing grades is the wrong thing to do.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cw2.trb.com/news/kwgn-student-grade-felony,0,7871401.story&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The impact of the removal of morality from the [[public school]] curriculum (which is also used in private schools) is that &amp;quot;more than one in three boys (35 percent) and one-fourth of the girls (26 percent) — a total of 30 percent overall — admitted stealing from a store within the past year.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://charactercounts.org/programs/reportcard/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Prayer ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The White House announced the release of Revised Religious  Guidelines for America's Public Schools on May 29, 1998.  Within this announcement, President Clinton stated, &amp;quot;Nothing in the First Amendment converts our public schools into religion-free zones, or requires all religious expression to be left behind at the school house door.&amp;quot; --President Clinton, July 12, 1995&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ed.gov/PressReleases/05-1998/wh-0530.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003, the Education Department released the following guidelines that clarified and added requirements to Public Schools to ensure the religious rights of students.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=17550&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schools that don’t allow students to pray outside the classroom or that prohibit teachers from holding religious meetings among themselves could lose federal money, the Education Department said late last week.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The guidance reflects the Bush administration’s push to ensure that schools give teachers and students as much freedom to pray as the courts have allowed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The department makes clear that teachers cannot pray with students or attempt to shape their religious views.&lt;br /&gt;
The instructions, released by the department on Feb. 7, broadly follow the same direction given by the Clinton administration and the courts. Prayer is generally allowed provided it happens outside the class and is initiated by students, not by school officials.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The department, however, also offered some significant additions, including more details on such contentious matters as moments of silence and prayer in student assemblies. And for the first time, federal funds are tied to compliance with the guidelines. The burden is on schools to prove compliance through a yearly report.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Teaching the Bible in Public Schools ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bibleinschools.net/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (NCBCPS) provides a program for teaching the Bible in public schools. Currently, the NCBCPS's Bible curriculum has been voted into 462 school districts (over 1,900 high schools) in 38 states. Over 210,000 students have already taken this course nationwide, on the high school campus, during school hours, for credit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Educational outcomes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Declining literacy ===&lt;br /&gt;
Since the rapid expansion and liberalization of public schools after [[World War II]], students' [[literacy]] levels have dropped significantly.  While the average 14-year-old had a vocabulary of 25,000 words in 1945, the equivalent student in 2000 had a vocabulary of only 10,000 words, a severe disadvantage in an increasingly textual world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Utne Reader'' (July-August 2000), 28-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal bias in textbooks===&lt;br /&gt;
Textbooks (K-12) have been systematically analyzed in a study funded by the U.S. government.  The 1986 findings were that massive, systematic [[liberal]] bias exists, resulting in several information blackouts in four key areas of modern American life&amp;amp;mdash;marriage, religion, politics, and business.  While an actual conspiracy was then ruled out, the cause was found to be a &amp;quot;a very widespread secular and liberal mindset&amp;quot; pervading &amp;quot;the leadership in the world of education [and textbook publishing]&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; ''Censorship: Evidence of Bias in Our Children's textbooks'', [[Paul C. Vitz]], Servant Books, 1986, ISBN 0-89283-305-X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor Larry Schwikart, of the University of Dayton, wrote a book about biased textbooks. False claims common in those texts included that the founders wanted a &amp;quot;wall of separation&amp;quot; between church and state, that &amp;quot;Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation only because he needed black soldiers&amp;quot;, and that &amp;quot;Mikhail Gorbachev, not Ronald Reagan, was responsible for ending the Cold War&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.emailwire.com/release/20086-Controversial-Historian-on-the-Price-of-Business-Show.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Non-Dismissal of Tenured Teachers===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the strength of the nation's teachers' union, it is nearly impossible to fire a bad performing teacher with tenure. The process can take years and involves countless steps to even attempt. The union claims that the protections are needed against arbitrary and malicious lawsuits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New York public schools system has approximately 700 teachers accused of  insubordination to sexual misconduct. They remain in seclusion from the classroom but are paid full salaries until their cases are heard, sometimes from months to years later. All because their union contract makes it extremely difficult to fire them. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/us_rubber_rooms/2009/06/22/227959.html 700 NYC Teachers Paid to Do Nothing] AP, June 22, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pathtodismissal.JPG|center|thumb|800px| Flow chart for firing teachers in the nations second largest school district, Los Angeles Unified School district]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Graduates==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Before 1962 ===&lt;br /&gt;
Given that public schools educate about 90% of [[Americans]], it is astounding how few prominent Americans attended public school after the banning of school prayer in 1962.  Here is an impressive list of prominent Americans who attended public schools ''before'' the banning of prayer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dixonil.com/reagan/reagan2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Dixon High School, Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dwight D. Eisenhower]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/press_releases/2007/PR07_11_August_02_2007_Eisenhower_Co_Sponsor_Little_Rock.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Abilene High School in Abilene, Kansas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard M. Nixon]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/edu/836/000068632/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Fullerton and Whittier High Schools, California&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gerald Ford]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.visitgrandrapids.org/ford-facts.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Grand Rapids South High School, Michigan&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lyndon B. Johnson]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/062/000023990/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Johnson City High School, Texas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Harry S Truman]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/103truman/103visual1.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Independence High School, Missouri&lt;br /&gt;
*[[H. Ross Perot]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.famoustexans.com/rossperot.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended public schools and Texarkana Junior College, Texas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Cheney]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/598/000022532/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Natrona County High School in Casper, Wyoming.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Colin Powell]] graduated from Morris High School, NY in 1954 and received his B.A. in geology from the City College of New York in 1958 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gale.cengage.com/free_resources/bhm/bio/powell_c.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Billy Graham]] graduated from Sharon High School, NC in May 1936&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online-bibleconcordance.com/Ministers/BillyGraham.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Medved]] graduated from Palisades High School, CA &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;michaelmedved.townhall.com/About.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Wright Brothers]] attended public schools in Richmond, India and Dayton OH but did not graduate &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.kyrene.org/schools/brisas/sunda/inventor/wright/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roy Jay Glauber]], Nobel laureate, graduated from Bronx High School of Science, Bronx, NY in 1941. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/738/000138324/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frederick Reines]], Nobel laureate, attended Union Hill High School, NJ, during the late 1930's. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/052/000099752/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Oliver North]], US Army Officer, political commentator, graduated from Ockawamick High School in 1961. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://libraryoflibrary.com/E_n_c_p_d_Ollie_North.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== After 1962 ===&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a list of celebrities and others who attended public school ''after'' prayer was banned in 1962:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Brad Pitt]], actor, graduated from Kickapoo High School in Springfield, Missouri, 1981; dropped out of college.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rolemodel.net/brad_pitt.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tom Cruise]], actor, attended several public high schools including Glen Ridge High School, New Jersey during the 1970's. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/791/000022725/&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Sununu]], former one-term Senator from [[New Hampshire]], graduated from Salem High School in the 1970's.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sununu.senate.gov/biography.html&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Edwards]], former one-term Senator from [[North Carolina]] and two-time unsuccessful candidate for nomination for president, attended public school in Robbins, N.C. during the 1960's.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/newshour/vote2004/primaries/edwards_bio.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Spike Lee]], producer, actor, graduated from John Dewey High School, Brooklyn, NY.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://movies.nytimes.com/person/99175/Spike-Lee/biography&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frank Wilczek]], Nobel laureate, attended Martin Van Buren High School, Queens, NY, during the late 1960's.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/720/000140300/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laura Bush]] attended James Bowie Elementary School, San Jacinto Junior High School, and Midland Lee High School in Midland, Texas (Graduated 1964); came out in support of [[gay marriage]] and [[abortion]] in 2010.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/laura-bush-supports-gay-marriage-abortion/story?id=10629213&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Cromwell Mather]], Nobel laureate, graduated from Newton High School, Newton, NJ in 1964. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/915/000137504/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Fitzgerald Smoot]], Nobel laureate, graduated from Upper Arlington High School, Upper Arlington, OH in 1962.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/921/000137510/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hugh David Politzer]], Nobel laureate, graduated from Bronx High School of Science, Bronx, NY in 1966.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/716/000140296/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William J. Clinton]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hotsprings.org/things_to_do/historic_hotsprings/presidents_hometown.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Hot Springs High School in Arkansas in 1964, and became the only president impeached in the 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Steve Jobs]], founder of [[Apple Inc.]], graduated from Homestead High School in Cupertino, CA in 1972; his colleague, [[Steve Wozniak]], graduated from the same high school in 1968.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eminem]], a [[liberal]] [[rapper]], repeatedly failed 9th grade in public school and ultimately dropped out.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alan Colmes]], a liberal news commentator, attended public school in [[New York City]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Public school culture]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Teacher Pay]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=860846</id>
		<title>Public schools in the United States</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=860846"/>
		<updated>2011-04-09T21:07:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: Better?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:800px-Warning signs at CHS.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Because of violence, vandalism, and other undesirable elements, this public school has a glaring sign warning of the on-campus surveillance cameras at its parking lot entrance.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Public schools]] in the [[United States]] are [[liberal]] and [[atheistic]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.exodusmandate.org/art_exodus_from_public_schools_gets_helping_hand.htm Exodus from &amp;quot;public schools&amp;quot; gets a helping hand], Exodus Mandate, Sept 15, 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, &amp;quot;in 2005, officials at East Brunswick High School adopted a policy prohibiting representatives of the school district from participating in student-initiated prayer.&amp;quot; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=61806]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;From 2004 to 2006, a [[public school]] banned [[Bible]] study by children ... ''during recess''. A teacher complained about the use of the Bible and the principal then censored the study activity, according to a sworn statement by a teacher told to stop it.  Principal &amp;quot;Summa, having learned of a complaint by a teacher and of the students' Bible study, told fourth-grade teacher Virginia Larue to nix the group's recess meeting. ... Larue later told one of Luke's Bible study colleagues the group could no longer meet at recess.&amp;quot;[http://knoxnews.com/news/2008/jan/03/recess-bible-study-spurs-lawsuit/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Atheists]] routinely impose their views on [[public schools]], though liberals deny it.  For example, a court prohibited a moment of silence in [[Illinois]] &amp;quot;Township High School District 214 after atheist activist Rob Sherman challenged&amp;quot; it.[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-moment_of_silence_bothmay30,0,7722271.story]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
government institutions that employ 3 million people and spend $411.5 billion annually at a cost of $10,770 per student.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.edreform.com/index.cfm?fuseAction=section&amp;amp;pSectionID=15&amp;amp;cSectionID=97 Statistics about education]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Spoken [[prayer]], the [[Ten Commandments]], and sharing of [[faith]] are expressly forbidden in public schools' classrooms during school hours, and teaching of [[morality]] is implicitly disfavored.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', ''[[Stone v. Graham]]'' (1980) (excluding Ten Commandments from public school).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A public school banned [[Bible]] study by children ... ''during recess''. A teacher complained about the use of the Bible and the principal then censored the study activity, according to a sworn statement by a teacher told to stop it.  [http://knoxnews.com/news/2008/jan/03/recess-bible-study-spurs-lawsuit/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Homosexual Agenda|Homosexual indoctrination]] is common as early as elementary school in more [[liberal]] states.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.massresistance.org/media/video/brainwashing.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The failures of underperforming public schools are paradigm of [[socialism]], along with [[landfills]] and the [[Canada|Canadian]] healthcare system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are characteristics of public schools:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*30% of public school students fail to graduate from high school,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;graduate&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Only 70% of all students in public high schools graduate, and only 32% of all students leave high school qualified to attend four-year colleges.&amp;quot;[http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/ewp_03.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and more than 40% of minorities fail to graduate;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Only 71 percent of kids graduate from high school within four years, and for minorities the numbers are even worse -- 58 percent for Hispanics and 55 percent for African Americans,&amp;quot; [Bill Gates] wrote. &amp;quot;If the decline in childhood deaths [in developing countries] is one of the most positive statistics ever, these are some of the most negative.&amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/29/AR2009032901353.html?wpisrc=newsletter]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the real drop-out rate may be 50%&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/47272207.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Nearly 70% leave high school unqualified to go on to four-year college.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;graduate&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*77% have used illicit drugs. Fatal overdoses are common but underreported; public schools are required to present [[Drug education|drug &amp;quot;education&amp;quot;]] to kids&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;According to Monitoring the Future, a study funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, illicit drug use is up among students between eighth and 12th grade. In 1991, 62 percent had used illicit drugs. In 2007, the number jumped to 77 percent. [http://www.battlecreekenquirer.com/article/20081207/NEWS08/812070305/1002] Fatal overdoses are common, although often underreported.[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B01E5DB123EF932A25750C0A9629C8B63 Reporting of a heroin overdose by 16-year-old [[public school]] student was an exception to the underreporting].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*More than 60% of public school teenagers (in one regional study) watch more than 3 hours of television a day, compared with a national average of 35%&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/dec/01/memphis-youth-make-progress-on-risky-behavior/ (study of Memphis students)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*About half of the pregnancies among girls attending public school end in [[abortion|abortions]] and about half end in birth. Public schools &amp;quot;[[Sex education|educate]]&amp;quot; kids about sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;There is zero shame [to [[teenage pregnancy]]],&amp;quot; the school nurse observed.[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/12/AR2008121203507.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;About 160,000 students miss school daily because they [[fear]] being [[Bully|bullied]],&amp;quot; and students viciously fight each other and post videos of it on [[YouTube|Youtube.com]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;One victim is now &amp;quot;being [[homeschooled]] at state expense.&amp;quot;[http://starbulletin.com/2008/05/18/news/story01.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*20% go on dangerous &amp;quot;[[binge drinking]],&amp;quot; and 50% drink illegally&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Oregon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.mlive.com/chronicle/news/index.ssf/2008/12/ottawa_co_youth_survey_surpris.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*10-20% become addicted to cigarettes&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Oregon&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/dec/01/memphis-youth-make-progress-on-risky-behavior/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*35% are overweight&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;health&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/nov/29/students-health-needs-attention/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Health screening of public schools in Memphis, Tennessee, found that nearly 10% have mental health problems&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;health&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
*More than 10% of public high schools have a pro-homosexual student club&lt;br /&gt;
*The majority of public school students are completely ignorant about the [[Bible]], even as [[Bible history|history]] and literature&lt;br /&gt;
*California public schools, largest in the nation, now rank at the bottom in academic achievement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/us/us_california_broken_schools/2009/06/21/227552.html High-Spending California School System Collapsing] AP, June 21, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===United States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1647, [[Massachusetts]] [[Puritans]] enacted the second law, after Scotland in 1616,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Social, Economic &amp;amp; Political Reasons for the Decline of Gaelic in Scotland [http://www.scottishhistory.com/articles/highlands/gaelic/gaelic_page1.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; establishing universal public [[school]]s in the English-speaking world to block the attempts by &amp;quot;ould deluder Satan to keepe men from the whole knowledge of the Scriptures&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Family Encyclopedia of American History'' (Reader's Digest 1975)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Each settlement larger than 50 families was required to pay a [[teacher|schoolmaster]] to teach reading, writing and religious doctrine to the [[children]] in the community. Beginning in 1670, Massachusetts provided [[taxation|tax]] funding for school maintenance. This model was then copied throughout the colonies, and even throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many children did not attend public school for the first two centuries. It was not until 1852 that Massachusetts became the first state to require attendance by students aged 6 through 16, and it was not until 1918 that all states had [[compulsory attendance]] laws. High schools did not generally exist until after the [[Civil War]], and the first American [[kindergarten]] didn't exist until 1856 in Watertown, Wisconsin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===United Kingdom===&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United Kingdom]], the term &amp;quot;public school&amp;quot; means the exact opposite of its American usage, and refers to the most expensive and prestigious ''private'' schools, such as [[Eton College]], [[Harrow]], and a few others.  The term public was used because the school was open to all public applicants, albeit ones that could afford to pay the fees.  The UK equivalent of US public schools are called state schools which provide education for free to all pupils.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first UK state school, Beverley Grammar School, was founded in 700AD.  Despite the fact that around 90% of UK children are educated at one, state schools are looked down upon and derided.  This is especially so of the 'Bog Standard Comprehensive' where images of teachers wearing stab vests and knife arches and invoked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Views on morals==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===So-called &amp;quot;character education&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to the perception that public schools have stopped teaching morality, many state education departments have or are in the process of developing &amp;quot;morality&amp;quot; that avoid good and evil, right and wrong, and instead present under the heading of &amp;quot;character&amp;quot; education.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3971/is_199910/ai_n8866284]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The lack of appreciation for right and wrong can surprise outsiders, and even school principals.  When one public school student was charged with [[felony]] [[computer crime]] for altering the grades of 20 students, the principal said, we &amp;quot;want to teach them what's right and wrong, and it's tough for some kids to catch on to the idea that changing grades is the wrong thing to do.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cw2.trb.com/news/kwgn-student-grade-felony,0,7871401.story&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The impact of the removal of morality from the [[public school]] curriculum (which is also used in private schools) is that &amp;quot;more than one in three boys (35 percent) and one-fourth of the girls (26 percent) — a total of 30 percent overall — admitted stealing from a store within the past year.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://charactercounts.org/programs/reportcard/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Prayer ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The White House announced the release of Revised Religious  Guidelines for America's Public Schools on May 29, 1998.  Within this announcement, President Clinton stated, &amp;quot;Nothing in the First Amendment converts our public schools into religion-free zones, or requires all religious expression to be left behind at the school house door.&amp;quot; --President Clinton, July 12, 1995&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ed.gov/PressReleases/05-1998/wh-0530.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003, the Education Department released the following guidelines that clarified and added requirements to Public Schools to ensure the religious rights of students.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=17550&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schools that don’t allow students to pray outside the classroom or that prohibit teachers from holding religious meetings among themselves could lose federal money, the Education Department said late last week.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The guidance reflects the Bush administration’s push to ensure that schools give teachers and students as much freedom to pray as the courts have allowed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The department makes clear that teachers cannot pray with students or attempt to shape their religious views.&lt;br /&gt;
The instructions, released by the department on Feb. 7, broadly follow the same direction given by the Clinton administration and the courts. Prayer is generally allowed provided it happens outside the class and is initiated by students, not by school officials.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The department, however, also offered some significant additions, including more details on such contentious matters as moments of silence and prayer in student assemblies. And for the first time, federal funds are tied to compliance with the guidelines. The burden is on schools to prove compliance through a yearly report.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Teaching the Bible in Public Schools ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bibleinschools.net/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (NCBCPS) provides a program for teaching the Bible in public schools. Currently, the NCBCPS's Bible curriculum has been voted into 462 school districts (over 1,900 high schools) in 38 states. Over 210,000 students have already taken this course nationwide, on the high school campus, during school hours, for credit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Educational outcomes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Declining literacy ===&lt;br /&gt;
Since the rapid expansion and liberalization of public schools after [[World War II]], students' [[literacy]] levels have dropped significantly.  While the average 14-year-old had a vocabulary of 25,000 words in 1945, the equivalent student in 2000 had a vocabulary of only 10,000 words, a severe disadvantage in an increasingly textual world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Utne Reader'' (July-August 2000), 28-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal bias in textbooks===&lt;br /&gt;
Textbooks (K-12) have been systematically analyzed in a study funded by the U.S. government.  The 1986 findings were that massive, systematic [[liberal]] bias exists, resulting in several information blackouts in four key areas of modern American life&amp;amp;mdash;marriage, religion, politics, and business.  While an actual conspiracy was then ruled out, the cause was found to be a &amp;quot;a very widespread secular and liberal mindset&amp;quot; pervading &amp;quot;the leadership in the world of education [and textbook publishing]&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; ''Censorship: Evidence of Bias in Our Children's textbooks'', [[Paul C. Vitz]], Servant Books, 1986, ISBN 0-89283-305-X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor Larry Schwikart, of the University of Dayton, wrote a book about biased textbooks. False claims common in those texts included that the founders wanted a &amp;quot;wall of separation&amp;quot; between church and state, that &amp;quot;Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation only because he needed black soldiers&amp;quot;, and that &amp;quot;Mikhail Gorbachev, not Ronald Reagan, was responsible for ending the Cold War&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.emailwire.com/release/20086-Controversial-Historian-on-the-Price-of-Business-Show.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Non-Dismissal of Tenured Teachers===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the strength of the nation's teachers' union, it is nearly impossible to fire a bad performing teacher with tenure. The process can take years and involves countless steps to even attempt. The union claims that the protections are needed against arbitrary and malicious lawsuits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New York public schools system has approximately 700 teachers accused of  insubordination to sexual misconduct. They remain in seclusion from the classroom but are paid full salaries until their cases are heard, sometimes from months to years later. All because their union contract makes it extremely difficult to fire them. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/us_rubber_rooms/2009/06/22/227959.html 700 NYC Teachers Paid to Do Nothing] AP, June 22, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pathtodismissal.JPG|center|thumb|800px| Flow chart for firing teachers in the nations second largest school district, Los Angeles Unified School district]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Graduates==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Before 1962 ===&lt;br /&gt;
Given that public schools educate about 90% of [[Americans]], it is astounding how few prominent Americans attended public school after the banning of school prayer in 1962.  Here is an impressive list of prominent Americans who attended public schools ''before'' the banning of prayer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dixonil.com/reagan/reagan2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Dixon High School, Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dwight D. Eisenhower]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/press_releases/2007/PR07_11_August_02_2007_Eisenhower_Co_Sponsor_Little_Rock.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Abilene High School in Abilene, Kansas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard M. Nixon]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/edu/836/000068632/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Fullerton and Whittier High Schools, California&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gerald Ford]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.visitgrandrapids.org/ford-facts.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Grand Rapids South High School, Michigan&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lyndon B. Johnson]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/062/000023990/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Johnson City High School, Texas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Harry S Truman]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/103truman/103visual1.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Independence High School, Missouri&lt;br /&gt;
*[[H. Ross Perot]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.famoustexans.com/rossperot.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended public schools and Texarkana Junior College, Texas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Cheney]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/598/000022532/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Natrona County High School in Casper, Wyoming.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Colin Powell]] graduated from Morris High School, NY in 1954 and received his B.A. in geology from the City College of New York in 1958 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gale.cengage.com/free_resources/bhm/bio/powell_c.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Billy Graham]] graduated from Sharon High School, NC in May 1936&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online-bibleconcordance.com/Ministers/BillyGraham.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Medved]] graduated from Palisades High School, CA &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;michaelmedved.townhall.com/About.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Wright Brothers]] attended public schools in Richmond, India and Dayton OH but did not graduate &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.kyrene.org/schools/brisas/sunda/inventor/wright/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roy Jay Glauber]], Nobel laureate, graduated from Bronx High School of Science, Bronx, NY in 1941. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/738/000138324/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frederick Reines]], Nobel laureate, attended Union Hill High School, NJ, during the late 1930's. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/052/000099752/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Oliver North]], US Army Officer, political commentator, graduated from Ockawamick High School in 1961. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://libraryoflibrary.com/E_n_c_p_d_Ollie_North.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== After 1962 ===&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a list of celebrities and others who attended public school ''after'' prayer was banned in 1962:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Brad Pitt]], actor, graduated from Kickapoo High School in Springfield, Missouri, 1981; dropped out of college.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rolemodel.net/brad_pitt.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tom Cruise]], actor, attended several public high schools including Glen Ridge High School, New Jersey during the 1970's. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/791/000022725/&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Sununu]], former one-term Senator from [[New Hampshire]], graduated from Salem High School in the 1970's.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sununu.senate.gov/biography.html&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Edwards]], former one-term Senator from [[North Carolina]] and two-time unsuccessful candidate for nomination for president, attended public school in Robbins, N.C. during the 1960's.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/newshour/vote2004/primaries/edwards_bio.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Spike Lee]], producer, actor, graduated from John Dewey High School, Brooklyn, NY.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://movies.nytimes.com/person/99175/Spike-Lee/biography&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frank Wilczek]], Nobel laureate, attended Martin Van Buren High School, Queens, NY, during the late 1960's.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/720/000140300/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laura Bush]] attended James Bowie Elementary School, San Jacinto Junior High School, and Midland Lee High School in Midland, Texas (Graduated 1964); came out in support of [[gay marriage]] and [[abortion]] in 2010.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/laura-bush-supports-gay-marriage-abortion/story?id=10629213&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Cromwell Mather]], Nobel laureate, graduated from Newton High School, Newton, NJ in 1964. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/915/000137504/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Fitzgerald Smoot]], Nobel laureate, graduated from Upper Arlington High School, Upper Arlington, OH in 1962.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/921/000137510/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hugh David Politzer]], Nobel laureate, graduated from Bronx High School of Science, Bronx, NY in 1966.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/716/000140296/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William J. Clinton]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hotsprings.org/things_to_do/historic_hotsprings/presidents_hometown.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Hot Springs High School in Arkansas in 1964, and became the only president impeached in the 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Steve Jobs]], founder of [[Apple Inc.]], graduated from Homestead High School in Cupertino, CA in 1972; his colleague, [[Steve Wozniak]], graduated from the same high school in 1968.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eminem]], a [[liberal]] [[rapper]], repeatedly failed 9th grade in public school and ultimately dropped out.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alan Colmes]], a liberal news commentator, attended public school in [[New York City]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Public school culture]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Teacher Pay]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=860845</id>
		<title>Talk:Public schools in the United States</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=860845"/>
		<updated>2011-04-09T21:05:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* 30% of public schools fail to graduate from high school? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Looks like a few people are trying to edit this page at the same time.  Between this and my initial screw-up with providing references, I think my edit should be alright.  I'll work on some more names later.--Jimmy 14:45, 7 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh my bad. I hate it when people edit conflict me so I always try to wait, but I guess I wated too long. I'm not sure why you undid the formatting though. In general we bullet any lists because it's so much easier to read. I'll chalk it up to an edit conflict and undo it. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:12, 7 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheistic Public Schools? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Public schools are not atheistic institutions. Just because they obey the constitution and don't promote prayer, it doesn't make them atheistic. In addition, they don't promote atheism at all, they merely don't promote religion. If no one minds, I'll remove the first section from the article.--[[User:Blinkadyblink|Blinkadyblink]] 19:17, 7 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree completely. Saying that because public schools do not preach christianity means that they are &amp;quot;atheistic&amp;quot; is ridiculous. Aren't conservatives the ones who say parents should educate their children about morals, not the government? Schools should teach math, science, history, writing, art, and foreign language and leave the rest for people to decide on their own. ''That'' is limited government. --[[User:Mars2035|Mars2035]] 21:21, 18 March 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My high school had agnostic students--thought they were atheist--with many Christian/Catholic teachers. +_+ &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;always tired&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; [[User:Kektklik|Kektk]] 14:03, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Religion is censored from [[public schools]]:  there is no classroom prayer, no religious symbols, no emphasize on moral right and wrong, etc.  Sure, students may be agnostic or religious, but they better not try to say a group prayer during class time or they risk being punished.  That's an atheistic culture.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:50, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Mr Schlafly:  It is one thing to assert something and another to actually provide a reference.  Is there any chance you could provide a valid reference that states American public schools are atheistic?  In my daughter's school, students are allowed to pray during class hours, moral values are taught and emphasized during civics and other classes, and she has never seen anyone punished for praying.  The atheist tag you are placing on this article wouldn't be constantly challenged if you could provide a solid reference.  --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 16:09, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: There is no classroom prayer in any [[public school]] in the [[United States]].  Does that really need a reference?  No morals are taught either and no religious symbols are displayed.  The [[Ten Commandments]] cannot be found either.  References could be supplied for these obvious facts; indeed, you could add them yourself.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:45, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Mr. Schlafly:  Please reference my last comment.  There is obviously prayer allowed and morals taught at my daughter's PUBLIC SCHOOL which is in AMERICA so you are wrong about asserting, without evidence, that prayer in public schools is prohibited in America.  And yes, your assertion needs a reference because it flies in the face of every statement issued by the Clinton and Bush administrations concerning prayer in public schools.  This is even mentioned in the article.  I even posted other evidence concerning the opinions of many civil liberties groups and their support of the constitutional right of students to pray in public school but you declared that edit was 'liberal' and deleted it.  Now if you want to insist that both Clinton and Bush are completely wrong and the advice they got from their legal advisors is completely without merit, please post a valid reference that disputes the opinions of our country's leaders and legal experts.  I don't have the slightest clue where I would find a reference that supports what you are claiming or I would gladly assist.  Please provide the reference to your assertion so we can all lay this matter to rest. --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 17:50, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article states that public schools are &amp;quot;atheistic,&amp;quot; and atheism is defined by this encyclopedia as the denial of the existence of God. I don't mean to get overly technical here, but it seems illogical that a broadly defined institution such as American public schools could be said to deny the existence of God, unless there has been some statement (or a rash of statements) that I am not aware of (and is not cited) on behalf of public schools specifically denying that God exists. The thrust of this article seems to be not that public schools are atheistic but that they are Godless institutions, lacking in the moral fundamentals of religion and defining themselves as expressly secular. Therefore, I am changing &amp;quot;atheistic&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Godless&amp;quot; in the header.  [[User:Kristkrispies|Kristkrispies]] 12:43, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Public schools are not &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot;, which means reflective of society as a whole.  Rather, they are deliberately exclusive of faith, morality and religion.  &amp;quot;Godless&amp;quot; is a pejorative term, and atheistic is better because it encompasses atheistic ideologies like evolution that are taught in schools.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:11, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I suppose you're right, although &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot; is often used to mean &amp;quot;exclusive of religion.&amp;quot; Yes, &amp;quot;Godless&amp;quot; is a pejorative, but so is &amp;quot;atheistic,&amp;quot; as least as it is defined in this encyclopedia. I also contest that evolution is an (exclusively) atheistic ideology, as many scientists who believe in evolution are theists. Finally, do you have any citations to support the fact that public schools specifically deny the existence of God, or are you using &amp;quot;atheistic&amp;quot; more as a catch-all to describe the godless mindset in general (and, if so, I'd like a better definition of the term). [[User:Kristkrispies|Kristkrispies]] 13:34, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: There may or may not be theistic evolutionists, but evolution is predominantly an atheistic ideology.   Ditto for other things taught in public school, such as materialism.  Schools are not merely &amp;quot;godless&amp;quot;, as they exclude teaching of &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot;.  The term &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot; is misused to mean &amp;quot;exclusive of religion.&amp;quot;  That is not its actual meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:42, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Sorry, just one more point here, regarding the definition of &amp;quot;secular:&amp;quot; according to dictionary.com, which may not be the best source, the first 3 definitions specifically mean &amp;quot;non-religious&amp;quot; and there is no definition given for &amp;quot;reflective of a society as a whole.&amp;quot; [[User:Kristkrispies|Kristkrispies]] 14:13, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: I just checked Merriam-Webster and ''none'' of the definitions mean &amp;quot;non-religious.&amp;quot; [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/secular]--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:02, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: As usual, I hate to differ with you, but 'I' just checked Merriam-Webster, and the first two definitions say &amp;quot;non-religious.&amp;quot; [[User:Kristkrispies|Kristkrispies]] 20:01, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: My cite doesn't.  One of the definitions does say not ''specifically'' religious, as in denominational.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:23, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::: Not to beat a dead horse, BUT the definition I'm seeing on Merriam-Webster.com says this: &amp;quot;1 a: of or relating to the worldly or temporal &amp;lt;secular concerns&amp;gt; b: not overtly or specifically religious &amp;lt;secular music&amp;gt; c: not ecclesiastical or clerical &amp;lt;secular courts&amp;gt; &amp;lt;secular landowners&amp;gt;&amp;quot; thus clearly defining secular as equivalent to nonreligious or nonspiritual. The next definition gets at more of the nondenominational meaning, but I don't see how you can say that this does not mean nonreligious. Furthermore, a search on Merriam-Webster's Thesaurus defines &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot; to mean &amp;quot;not involving religion or religious matters &amp;lt;that's an issue for the secular authorities, not the church&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. On the other hand, I have not seen a single dictionary support your definition of secular as &amp;quot;reflective of society as a whole.&amp;quot; [[User:Kristkrispies|Kristkrispies]] 23:51, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think &amp;quot;non-religious&amp;quot; is a better term.[[User:JPohl|JPohl]] 13:51, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;Non-religious&amp;quot; does not capture the hostility, such as the affirmative censorship of prayer.  A group may be non-religious and still allow, and even welcome, an occasional prayer.  But an atheistic culture censors the occasional group prayer, as public schools do.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:54, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think this is a good point, but what I want to know is why you want to characterize hostility toward religion on the part of public schools (an unsourced pejorative), yet you won't use &amp;quot;godless&amp;quot; on the grounds that it is pejorative. Also, I was hoping for an answer to the other concerns I brought up, and if I may add one more to that: you say that &amp;quot;Schools are not merely godless, as they exclude teaching of right and wrong,&amp;quot; but don't you think that being godless inherently suggests the lack of morality, in the same way that atheism does? Again, you need to cite some sources to describe this broader atheistic lifestyle you seem to be describing. [[User:Kristkrispies|Kristkrispies]] 14:06, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As I've said before (I think, but I'm too lazy to check), I'd prefer &amp;quot;nontheistic&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;atheistic.&amp;quot;  Usual disclaimers apply. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 22:16, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: [[Public schools]] are hostile to more than [[God]], such as right and wrong, and promote (false) ideologies that lead students to [[atheism]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:37, 11 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There not so much Atheistic as they are anti-Christian. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 23:40, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It is very obvious that you and whoever wrote this article has never set foot in a public school with competent staff. I am a high school senior and we have a moment of silence every day. The majority of my teachers are Christians, and although they do not press their beliefs on anyone, they certainly make it known.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::My biology teacher frequently emphasizes the fact that evolution can coexist with the teachings of the three mainstream religions. He presents evolution as a fact (because...I'm sorry, but it is one. We're in the 21st century now, guys) but does not discount panspermia (the belief that life came from another planet) or intelligent design. He is a Christian, but does not bias his information one way or the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::In my Theory of Knowledge class, the liberals, conservatives, Christians, Hindus, and atheists openly debate the definition and roots of ethics, morality, and religion. Sometimes we reach a conclusion leaning towards atheism, sometimes we reach one leaning towards Christianity. But the point is, we are presented the facts and we debate, discuss, research, and discover the roots, impacts, and issues of many ethical paradoxes and religious issues. The teacher provides input, but only to clarify and guide us in the direction of the class standards. I've learned more about what is right and wrong through arguments in that class than I have in any religious service. I've won debates and been viciously proven wrong, but at the end of the day we're all classmates who joke about it later, because unlike so many people, we have an open enough mind to throw our opinions out there and see if they stand the tests of debate and scrutiny.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Not that anything on this site is remotely correct (I thought this site was a joke when I read the Obama &amp;quot;article&amp;quot;...it still could be for all I know), but public education is something I just gotta take a stand on. No one knows better than someone who's been through 11.5 years of it. And if anyone's wondering, I live in the conservative state of SC, smack dab in the middle of the Bible Belt. So don't tell me my surroundings influence my opinions, because they don't. I know this comment (or parts of it) will be deleted/altered shortly after it is posted (because I don't agree with you...very fair, I know), but I hope at least one diehard conservative reads this and realizes that not every issue can be defended from his upper-middle class white Christian Hummer-driving viewpoint. If anyone would like to discuss my contribution further on an unbiased, uncensored, free medium, my AIM name is kevh89 and my e-mail address is Nivek_04085@yahoo.com. So much for access to Conservapedia, because like a dissenter in communist Russia, I will probably be exiled from the IP for disagreeing. I'll just have to log in on a friends' computer for my daily laughs. This &amp;quot;encyclopedia&amp;quot; is an insult to education. [[User:Frogmaster13|Frogmaster13]] 21:58, 15 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel the need to point out that the reason prayer and whatnot are not used in public schools is because the United States Law ensures freedom of religion and separation of church and state, which is meant to advance this end. Not all public school students are Christian. Many are atheist, agnostic, or some other religion that does not have the same rituals (specifically, praying to God) as Christianity. Not only would prayer and whatnot in public schools be illegal, it would be unfair to all of the young Americans who are non-Christian. That is my interpretation. [[User:Luminite2|Luminite2]] 23:05, 9 April 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm a religious person, devout in my faith, but I don't think that prayer should be allowed.  For my faith or any other, do you know why?  No one is of the same religion.  I had a buddy, an Atheist, go to a school.  A public school.  When people found out he wasn't Christian, they tried to beat him up int he name of Jesus Christ.  My children will be raised in my faith, a pagan faith.  We are small in number, and as your site suggests, very good people.  But with people out there that would attack my future children for not being of the same faith, why would I want to bring that upon them?  Also, I'm a moderate, I'd actually consider myself to be moderate-conservative, but I had outrageous conservative views *pushed* upon me at my school.  Not liberal views.  Conservative.  I had a teacher tell the students not to vote for Kerry because he supported gay rights.  And why do schools need to teach morals?  Teach right and wrong?  Isn't that why parents exist?  I'll teach my kids morals.  I'll teach them what I believe to be right and wrong.  I don't need some teacher telling them right and wrong.  That isn't their job.  To me, this article makes it sound like conservatives want to be lazy and have schools do all of their parenting work for them. - JaffaLycosa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Liberals believe in free speech for their views, but not for conservative ones.  Public schools have liberal speech ad nauseum.  It's tyranny to censor prayer and other conservative speech in public schools.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:47, 9 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I believe in free speech for everyone.  My school, conservatives were beating up liberals for their liberal views.  I was in a public school my whole life (fortunately, my parents weren't rich enough to put me in a private school).  Liberals cut off conservatives and conservatives cut off liberals.  Neither one of them are better than the other.  But all of these comments are garbage.  Because Jesus isn't pushed onto me at school is why I have a lower vocabulary?  You really think religion has anything to do with lower grades?  And why just Christianity?  Do you really think that my children deserve to have a religion forced upon them at a public school?  I thought this was a free country?  Free of religion.  You're acting like this country should be freedom of religion for Christians and nothing else.  I don't want my kids learning from the Ten Commandments at school.  So tell me, if Christianity should be allowed back in school, should teaching my religion be allowed as well? - JaffaLycosa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You don't believe in meaningful free speech if you insist on censoring classroom prayer.  Your claims about people beating each other up is just a liberal way to justify censorship of conservative speech in school.  Even if that were your criterion, there's a lot more &amp;quot;beating up&amp;quot; done in the absence of classroom prayer.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:35, 9 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Oh, I believe in Freedom of Speech.  And also, my 'claims' aren't a 'liberal way'.  These aren't conservative views you're throwing here, they are hateful Christian views.  I don't care if people pray in school, I'm talking about organized prayer.  When you have &amp;quot;prayer time&amp;quot; and not everyone believes in praying, it makes those people outcasts.  It's not a good thing.  If a group of kids want to go pray to their god during lunch time, that's fine by me.  Go right ahead and more power to you.  It happened in my school and people didn't get into trouble.  But I'm talking about when prayer time is set aside in the classroom in the school.  It's a public school, prayer is a religious thing.  Religion, mine or yours or in general, doesn't need to be forced on anyone.  I'm sure you can agree to that. -JaffaLycosa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::While I do not believe that teachers should influence students on any single religion (religion is a fascinating thing and I believe all major religions should be taught, and equally at that), I also don't see any problem with students praying in school, or even teachers (as long as they don't force a student to pray). Another thing is that sports coaches in high school should be allowed to lead their players in a prayer before going out to a game. If the player isn't religious, or not Christian, or whatever, no harm done. They don't have to participate. I'm new here and I don't mean to offend or anything, just sharing my opinion. I apologize if its been stated already. [[User:CeruleanFalls|SarahH]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I agree with that, Sarah.  Prayer was allowed in my school, just not organized prayer.  From what I can tell, that's how the law states.  No one was in trouble when they prayed.  It was when they forced their beliefs that the trouble came.  That's why I don't understand this.  In fact, my school, a public school, had a religious studies class.  It studied religions.  That would make it not an atheist school.  Also, don't say major religions.  There are minor religions out there too.  Don't play favorites here.  -JaffaLycosa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::JaffaLycosa, I can't tell if you're unaware of how liberals censor prayer in public schools, or if you're aware but in denial.  In public schools, there cannot be a classroom prayer ever, under any circumstance.  A coach cannot participate in a prayer with players.  Do you support this censorship, or not?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:41, 9 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Andy, I don't support censorship much at all to be honest.  If people want to pray, more power to them.  Having an organized &amp;quot;prayer time&amp;quot; I don't agree is a good idea.  If students want to pray, let them.  Don't let them force their beliefs on others, however.  Same with teachers.  After 9/11, I took part in a prayer circle on my school grounds.  Although it was Christian oriented, I still took part out of respect for those that died.  No one got into trouble for it.  I don't see this total attack against prayer.  All I've seen is an attack against organized prayer.  Now, if you want to have a time set aside during the day for &amp;quot;self reflection&amp;quot; and people want to pray during that time, that's fine.  I don't even care if there are religious groups involved at school, as long as all religions are allowed to be represented and even non-theists and atheists are allowed to have groups.  I pray to my gods, Andy, trust me.  I don't think that praying is bad at all, but we have to go about it in an intelligent way.  The last thing schools need is a religious war in their halls.  And on that note, I think that teaching religion in schools is a good idea.  A class enveloping all of the religions to teach respect for one another, which to me, is the American way.  I may be &amp;quot;pagan&amp;quot; Andy, but I'm not hateful towards Christians in the slightest nor do I wish for their religious views and beliefs to be stamped out, even in schools.  --  JaffaLycosa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::JaffaLycosa, the students want to start the class with a prayer, and the teacher wants to participate.  '''This is illegal in public schools'''.  The football players want to say a prayer before taking the field, and the coach wants to join them.  '''This is illegal in public schools'''.  Do you support that ban, or not?  Please state your position first, and only afterward is it productive to discuss your reasons.  This isn't rocket science, and I'll move on to other discussions if your position still remains unclear.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:03, 9 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Its pretty clear to me that Jaffa has already stated that he/she (not sure if male or female) agrees that teachers and high school sports team coaches should be allowed to pray if they want to, as Jaffa stated they agree with me when I said that. I am unclear as to whether there is an actual ban in place stating teachers/coaches can under no circumstances participate in prayers in public schools. Could you cite a specific law or policy which prevents teachers/coaches from participating in prayer organized by the students/players, Mr. Schlafly? I'd be very interested in seeing what is in place, exactly. Thank you. [[User:CeruleanFalls|SarahH]] 14:33, 9 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::If it weren't rocket science, Andy, then you'd have came to the same conclusion Sarah just did.  I don't care if students and teachers want to pray.  As long as they don't shove their beliefs on others, as long as they don't act like someone is wrong because they don't participate in the same prayer, I don't care.  But I want to know, Andy, would you mind if the teacher started a pagan prayer with the class?  If you heard about a teacher that prayed a pagan prayer with some pagan students, how would you react?  Please be honest, I'd like to know your stance on teachers and students taking part in organized non-Christian/Jewish/Islam prayers.  But to answer your question clearly, I'm not against it.  As I said, I took part in a '''Christian''' prayer with both '''students''' and '''teachers''' involved while a pagan.  If people want to pray, let them.  Just don't beat people up or treat them like crap if they don't.  Also, I'm a guy.  -  JaffaLycosa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::How'd I know you weren't going to answer that question? - JaffaLycosa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::You probably knew because I already said &amp;quot;I'll move on to other discussions if your position still remains unclear.&amp;quot;  Also, 100% of your edits have been talk, talk, talk, in violation of our [[90/10 Rule]].  Unlike Wikipedia, we help students and others here and nonstop talk doesn't advance that goal.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:25, 10 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uncited Assertions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to see evidence for the assertion that public schools are atheistic and spoken prayer is forbidden in the classroom.  The idea that this should be present without a reference goes against the standards of this encyclopedia.--Jimmy 13:56, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Then go ahead and help find it.  If I can find such references within the time it takes you to complain about the lack of them, then you can find them as well and help contribute to the building of this encyclopedia.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:06, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::It is my understanding that the person making the claim needs to provide the source documentation.  For the record, I do not know of any reputable source that claims the American public school system is atheistic.  Nor do I know of any law or court decision that prohibits all spoken prayer in the classroom, hence my request for a citation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Just so you know, I am contributing to the building of this encyclopedia.  In the time I have taken to voice my objection to the lack of sources, have you come up with your own references?--Jimmy 15:26, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes I have.  I've known for years that school prayer was removed from the schools as a result of an atheistic loudmouth named Madalyn Murray O'Hair, who used her son to force her religious beliefs through the Supreme Court in 1962.  The account was also written in the book &amp;quot;Let Us Pray&amp;quot;, by William Murray, an evangelical pastor who was O'Hair's tool back then.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Whining about lack of references does not build up this encyclopedia; helping out to fill in the missing holes does, and I expect you to do so.  You don't know because you never bothered to look; you sat there and expected everyone else to do it for you. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:58, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Prayer has not been removed from public schools and anyone that thinks this is the case is seriously misinformed.  O'Hair's lawsuit, ''Murray v. Curlett'', (consolidated with ''Abington Township School District v. Schempp'') declared school sponsored Bible reading in public schools in the United States to be unconstitutional.  The key words here are 'school sponsored'.  Students are allowed to pray as long as it is initiated by them and does not interfere with classes or instruction.  Please reference this court ruling and the additional references I included in the article concerning the opinions of the Clinton and Bush administrations position on public school prayer.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You are referring to my requests for documentation as 'whining'.  Yet all I am trying to do is follow the commandments and guidelines of this encyclopedia.  This is Conservapedia, an organization where the article writers must provide documentation for their articles.  This is not Wikipedia where everyone is entitled to their own opinion without providing references.  What is wrong with insisting that everyone follow the rules and guidelines?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm sure that you noticed that the vast majority of this article has been written by me.  Every word I have written is backed-up by references as required by the commandments.  Yet this doesn't seem to satisfy you, why not?  I've put a significant amount of time into this article and when someone makes an unreferenced assertion, I would like them to provide the same type of references that I am required to.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::If you have an addition to this article or a source that can back-up what is already written, then please contribute your efforts.  Where this article is concerned, all you have done is complain when someone is trying to make valid contributions. --Jimmy 16:28, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Jimmy, sources are readily available on the internet, or simply ask someone who goes to public school, or teaches there.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:36, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::If the sources are readily available, then they should be listed with the article.  A person reading the article shouldn't have to do their own research when the article writer is required to provide a reference.--Jimmy 16:53, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I think this represents one of the biggest problems I've identified with site in that it is built upside down. Most articles seem to start with conclusions (public schools are bad, atheism is bad, Obama is a Muslim) and then looks for evidence to support these conclusions. If no evidence is found, the statements are usually just left. An encylopedia should look at the evidence first, then see which conclusions can be drawn from it.--[[User:RonAbdul|RonAbdul]] 10:24, 4 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Provide your best specific example and let's look at it.  The &amp;quot;biggest problem&amp;quot; with the detractors, with all due respect, is a lack of an open mind.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:31, 4 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::: Well, I've been trying to draw your attention to the problems with the Tone Section in the Obama article, which I tried to address on the Obama talk page.--[[User:RonAbdul|RonAbdul]] 15:33, 4 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mandatory / Teacher-lead / Spoken Prayers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry if there was some sort of misunderstanding, but I wasn't aware that all spoken prayer is banned in public schools... would a student making a simple prayer (at a practical time) really be punished for doing so? Perhaps I'm missing another sort of prayer, other than teacher-led, that is also banned? I was just trying to clarify what is actually &amp;quot;forbidden&amp;quot; and where these lines are drawn in most public schools. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 16:06, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Yes, it is banned.  Surely you know someone who goes to public school, or teaches there????  Anyone, teacher or student, who tries to lead a prayer in school is likely to be disciplined and have that go on his record.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:34, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I know people that go to and teach at public schools and prayer is allowed many times during the day, even during class time as long as it does not interfere with instruction.  Yet the article states: ''''Spoken prayer … are expressly forbidden in public schools classrooms during school hours, and teaching of morality is implicitly disfavored.''''  I would like to see a reference that supports that sentence, it seems to be at odds with what I observe and current legal reasoning.--Jimmy 16:50, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah, yes, I see what you mean Andy... sorry, I didn't mean to overemphasize who it was leading the prayer. In public schools, essentially any prayer beyond individual, inconspicuous prayer on one's own time is banned or strongly discouraged. Perhaps instead of &amp;quot;spoken prayer&amp;quot;... &amp;quot;group prayer&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;collective prayer&amp;quot; might more accurately denote this situation? I'm not sure, the current term seemed a bit confusing - but that might just be me. Anyway, clarify it if you like, thanks for explaining. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 20:34, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Why were my edits reverted?  I've been asking for a reference for the school prayer comments at the top of the page for a while and none were provided.  The comment about prominent Americans not attending public schools since 1962 was deleted because I felt it was a little odd to have that sentence there when it is obvious that it was not true.--Jimmy 13:21, 4 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: The list shows that the only prominent Americans were educated before 1962, and there is no disputing the observation about prayer being banned at public schools, along with the Ten Commandments.  You can easily find cites for that if that were your goal.  Deleting factual information for liberal reasons is allowed at Wikipedia, but not here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:24, 4 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::There are two lists of prominent Americans educated in public schools.  The second list provides the names of fifteen that were educated after 1962 so why are you insisting that there aren't any prominent Americans educated after 1962?  I am disputing your observation concerning public school prayer because according to George W. Bush and the Department of Education, you are wrong, and Bush is far from being a liberal.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I can't find any cites to support your conclusions about public school prayer; that is why I want you to provide them.  If they exist, please show me where, according to the commandments it is your responsibility to do so.  Since Conservapedia is supposed to be &amp;quot;The Trustworthy Encyclopedia&amp;quot;, I feel that references should be provided for every alleged fact presented in its pages.  I don't see how that has a liberal stance, facts are facts.--Jimmy 13:40, 4 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Um, last time I checked, only teacher led/mandatory prayer in schools was banned. Students/Teachers can pray, however, they can't be disruptive to the class or make others pray that don't want to. Anyways, then there is the matter of which religion's prayers/worship style should be used. That would show favoritism to one religion and annoy other people who get offended. This leads to either having the class do prayers, etc.. of every religion or not having any prayer mandatory. The first option is infeasible because it would detract from time that could be used to learn subject material. So that is why teacher led/mandatory prayer isn't allowed in public schools. Willing individuals can pray together, however it must not be a distraction to a class. This is my two cents.[[User:JudgeKing|JudgeKing]] 13:00, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unjustified Edits ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Schlafly:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is just getting worse.  Your reference to the prohibition of the Ten Commandments in public schools is a reference to another Conservapedia article which itself doesn't have a reference.  How is that suppose to work?  And this reference has nothing to do with the alleged prohibition of spoken prayer or teaching of morality.  I'll ask again, can you provide valid references for the following opinions you have made; spoken prayer is prohibited in public schools, school prayer was banned in 1962, and the teaching of morality is disfavored?  According to the commandments of this encyclopedia, you are not providing the proper documentation for most of your opinions expressed in this article and yet I get the feeling you wouldn't tolerate unreferenced edits from me.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Changing the heading of the second list of Americans that attended public schools doesn't make sense.  Of the fifteen people listed, only three can be considered 'celebrities'.  The rest are prominent business men, astronauts, politicians, an aviator and a soldier.  Since only 20% of the people listed are celebrities, how does that add up to 'mostly celebrity'?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I get the feeling that I am going to be blocked soon.  I was warned once before about not insisting on people following the rules of this encyclopedia and that I should be expected to look up the references for other people's opinions even if I didn't think they were valid.  I hope I'll be able to make contributions to this website.--Jimmy 20:38, 4 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not quite yet, but I reverted your last edit here. If you feel that schools are teaching morality, reversing the wording of one sentence isn't helping the article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can you write a few sentences on [[Morality in public schools]], please? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:22, 5 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I would like to write a section about morality in public schools, but what good would it do.  The second sentence of this article claims, without providing any evidence whatsoever, that student prayer in public schools is prohibited and morality implicitly disfavored.  It doesn't matter that I provided plenty of evidence that this assertion is completely without basis.  Unless the second sentence is changed to reflect reality, this article will always look goofy.  The latest reference that Aschlafly supplied actually shows prayer is allowed at public schools.  I quote from the reference, &amp;quot;'''It ended in the spring of 2006 when the Knox County School Board promised in writing to allow students &amp;quot;religious expression&amp;quot; during &amp;quot;discretionary time'''.&amp;quot;  Far from demonstrating that public schools are forbidding prayer, this reference makes it clear that if students are denied the right to pray during non-instructional times, they always have someone that will fight for them and restore their rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Look at the edits I made earlier that were reverted.  Notice how many times 'atheistic' was replaced with 'secular' before it wasn't reverted.  A list showing a broad coalition of civil liberties groups supporting public school prayer was removed for being 'liberal'.  I've had no luck removing the 'disclaimer' about prominent Americans being educated in public schools.  It still states prayer is banned and no 'prominent Americans' have been educated in public schools even though I have demonstrated otherwise.  I've made continuous requests for references to support the opinions expressed in the second sentence of this article only to be ignored and threatened.  Will you offer any assurance that what I write will not be summarily dismissed?  I'd hate to waste my time.--Jimmy 00:07, 6 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference List ==&lt;br /&gt;
Something happened to the reference list after my last edit.  --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 11:33, 5 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;#42;points to #25 and #26&amp;amp;#42; +_+ &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;always tired&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; [[User:Kektklik|Kektk]] 17:33, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Drop out rates==&lt;br /&gt;
It's worse in some districts. Less than 25% of students in Detroit graduate. That is one big reason why I am working on getting certified to teach in the inner city - the need is so great. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 17:40, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: God bless you for doing that, Dan.  If I could hold classroom prayer to start the class with those kids and get rid of the liberal ideology, I could double that graduation rate.  But the liberals won't allow it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:42, 25 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Actually, it's probably because the No Child Left Behind Act. The NCLBA forces teachers to teach to the test instead of the subject matter. Schools that don't meet the requirements loose funding and find themselves in financial holes that are kind of hard to get out of (that was an understatement). It also forces schools to reduce funding in the science arts in favor of basic skills. While the basic skills are important, the sciences and arts are absolutely paramount to society. Anyways, the government as a whole must take the blame for this because of the negative effects. [[User:JudgeKing|JudgeKing]] 13:13, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political Correctness as a Hindering Factor==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's frequently noted that private schools tend to do better than public schools, and that other countries (India, China, and so forth) are turning out more and better-equipped scientists and engineers than America at present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that there's a common factor: none of those educational environments are guided by the notion that every student has equal ability, and that if we just try really hard, every student can achieve at the same level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bluntly: that notion is political correctness, and it's a tremendous handicap for several reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, it makes it all but impossible to hold students accountable for their own education.  Social promotion ensures that students who make no effort continue to be passed on to higher grades.  While in school, they face essentially no consequences for lack of effort; the consequences only catch up with them when they get out into the real world and discover that they're woefully unqualified for any job.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, the one-size-fits-all approach to education hurts both gifted and non-gifted students in the name of &amp;quot;not labeling.&amp;quot;  Modern educational theory insists that students at all levels of ability need to be taught in the same classroom at the same time, resulting in a Catch-22.  Either the teacher can teach at the level of the lowest students in the class--ensuring that the rest of the class will be bored stiff and receive little useful information--or at a higher level, ensuring that the struggling students will be lost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is hand-waved with bland optimism and buzzwords like &amp;quot;differentiated instruction.&amp;quot;  There's only so much differentiation you can do in forty minutes, though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Why'' is it wrong to suggest that working with a group of students who are at roughly the same level will enable lessons to be tailored to that level?  Why is it wrong to suggest that students who excel in English, in science, or in mathematics be given the chance to excel and to push beyond the baseline curriculum?  ''That'' is how other countries produce better-educated engineers and scientists: they don't try to educate everyone to the same level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apologies for the rant, but as a teacher in a public school myself, I'm frequently frustrated by having my hands tied.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 20:30, 10 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A suggestion about references ==&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. DeanS:  The references for the claim that public schools are atheistic are downright embarrassing.  The first reference deals with Kennedy's assertion that public schools are atheistic; no need for him to give any evidence, just blah, blah, blah.  The second reference is from WND, that by itself is bad enough, but after taking 30 seconds to read the article, I actually laughed out loud for a few seconds.  I don't quite understand, the reference says the school is allowing football players to pray as a group, and this is your evidence that public schools are atheistic?  I thought public school students weren't allowed to pray in public schools?  That is the completely unsupported claim made by one of the editors of this article.  Yet you posted a reference that stated kids are allowed to pray?  The third reference actually said students have the right to pray during discretionary time.  It stated at the beginning of the article, ''&amp;quot;It ended in the spring of 2006 when the Knox County School Board promised in writing to allow students &amp;quot;religious expression&amp;quot; during &amp;quot;discretionary time.&amp;quot;''  And you insist on saying this is a quality reference for your assertion that public schools are atheistic?  Please give me a break.  You can do much better than that.  If your claim can actually be supported that is.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article is a complete piece of junk because it has so many contradicting claims.  Every claim that public schools are atheistic or doesn't teach morals is backed up with lousy references that don't support the claim while the entries I wrote used reliable references.  Is there any chance this article can be edited to reflect reality?  I realize some people just can't grasp the concept that students in America's secular public schools are allowed to pray, out loud, even during classes, and are allowed to read the Ten Commandments, etc.  I know this because this is what happens at every public school my children have attended and this is what our current president even says.  Now if you want to claim Bush doesn't know what he is talking about, go right ahead and say he is a clueless fool for insisting that public school students don't have the religious freedoms he claims.  But please post intelligent and meaningful references, if they can be found, that way this encyclopedia won't look ignorant.  --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 00:19, 11 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Jimmy, don't make emotional arguments to promote an editorial suggestion; as you say, it's embarrassing. Follow your own advice, such as, &amp;quot;You can do much better than that.  If your claim can actually be supported . . .&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:13, 30 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Uh. Jimmy's post is dated '''&amp;quot;June 11, 2008&amp;quot;'''. As you say he says, it's embarrassing. Jimmy has also been banned for all eternity more than two weeks ago. --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 19:01, 30 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Atheistic and secular==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The secularism of the US public schools promotes atheism. Let's not pretend otherwise. [[User:Human]], you do indeed [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Public_schools&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=507180 risk your editing rights] to assert otherwise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you can find support for religion in any public school, you may add that to the counterexamples section (or start such a section). But the trend is clearly toward [[Atheism]], a positive '''denial''' of the existence of [[God]], along with [[Materialism]], an explicit denial of the reality of the [[supernatural]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do not use edit summaries as a debate forum. You know better than this. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:11, 30 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''The secularism of the US public schools promotes atheism.''  This, I think may be true.  But that's a different thing from saying the schools ARE atheist.  If you take a look at the US Dept of Ed's Guidance on Constitutionally Protected Prayer in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools US Dept of Ed's Guidance on Constitutionally Protected Prayer in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools:[http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/religionandschools/prayer_guidance.html], which is the government's official word on the subject, you get a pretty good idea of the governing principals and where the line is supposed to be drawn.  (Of course, there are always school districts here and there who step over the line one way or another, usually with much fanfare in the press.  This doesn't, however, change the fact that schools are ''supposed'' to follow the guidelines set forth by the Dept of Ed.)  Some highlights:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''''The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the First Amendment requires public school officials to be neutral in their treatment of religion, showing neither favoritism toward nor hostility against religious expression such as prayer.'''''  This, I would argue, is pretty much the definition of &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot;.  It's certainly not atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Accordingly, the First Amendment '''forbids religious activity that is sponsored by the government''' but '''protects religious activity that is initiated by private individuals''', and the line between government-sponsored and privately initiated religious expression is vital to a proper understanding of the First Amendment's scope. As the Court has explained in several cases, &amp;quot;there is a crucial difference between government speech endorsing religion, which the Establishment Clause forbids, and private speech endorsing religion, which the Free Speech and Free Exercise Clauses protect.&amp;quot;'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Although the Constitution forbids public school officials from directing or favoring prayer, students do not &amp;quot;shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate,&amp;quot; and the Supreme Court has made clear that &amp;quot;private religious speech, far from being a First Amendment orphan, is as fully protected under the Free Speech Clause as secular private expression.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''&amp;quot;nothing in the Constitution ... prohibits any public school student from voluntarily praying at any time before, during, or after the school day,&amp;quot; and students may pray with fellow students during the school day on the same terms and conditions that they may engage in other conversation or speech.&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Prayer During Noninstructional Time - Students may pray when not engaged in school activities or instruction, subject to the same rules designed to prevent material disruption of the educational program that are applied to other privately initiated expressive activities. Among other things, students may read their Bibles or other scriptures, say grace before meals, and pray or study religious materials with fellow students during recess, the lunch hour, or other noninstructional time to the same extent that they may engage in nonreligious activities.'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Organized Prayer Groups and Activities - Students may organize prayer groups, religious clubs, and &amp;quot;see you at the pole&amp;quot; gatherings before school to the same extent that students are permitted to organize other non-curricular student activities groups. Such groups must be given the same access to school facilities for assembling as is given to other non-curricular groups, without discrimination because of the religious content of their expression.'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Teachers, Administrators, and other School Employees - Teachers may take part in religious activities where the overall context makes clear that they are not participating in their official capacities. Before school or during lunch, for example, teachers may meet with other teachers for prayer or Bible study to the same extent that they may engage in other conversation or nonreligious activities. Similarly, teachers may participate in their personal capacities in privately sponsored baccalaureate ceremonies.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Moments of Silence - If a school has a &amp;quot;minute of silence&amp;quot; or other quiet periods during the school day, students are free to pray silently, or not to pray, during these periods of time.'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Religious Expression and Prayer in Class Assignments - Students may express their beliefs about religion in homework, artwork, and other written and oral assignments free from discrimination based on the religious content of their submissions.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot; is the more accurate term, despite a few examples of schools which mistakenly restricted students' rights to prayer. Trends away from secularism, and so on, can be described in a paragraph later in the entry. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 17:12, 30 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;Secular&amp;quot; means: &amp;quot;1 a: of or relating to the worldly or temporal &amp;lt;secular concerns&amp;gt; b: not overtly or specifically religious &amp;lt;secular music&amp;gt; c: not ecclesiastical or clerical &amp;lt;secular courts&amp;gt; &amp;lt;secular landowners&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/secular]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: None of those definitions describes the overwhelmingly [[atheistic]] leadership and culture of [[public schools]].  Students are more likely to hear God mentioned or worshiped in an atheistic country than in a public school.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:50, 30 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nitpick: My Circular Reasoning sense is tingling: You look at a definition for &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot;, realize that it doesn't meet your assumption that the public schools are atheistic (and not secular) and then conclude that &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot; is not the right word. --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 18:57, 30 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Late comment: I'd prefer the term &amp;quot;nontheistic.&amp;quot;  &amp;quot;Atheistic&amp;quot; implies explicit denial of the existence of a higher being; &amp;quot;nontheistic&amp;quot; implies that the schools just don't address the concept. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 14:59, 16 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Removal of Section on Famous Americans ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are ''so'' many things wrong with the section on famous Americans who have attended public school. How do you define &amp;quot;attended&amp;quot;: is it graduates only, or those who have spent even a day in a public institution? How do you define &amp;quot;prominent American&amp;quot;? Politicians, musicians, artists, owners of large corporations, athletes, who counts? Also, note that the list would probably require several hundred pages, considering that virtually ever American who has a graduate-level education (GED-worthy) attended a public school, including a vast, vast majority of Americans that would be considered &amp;quot;prominent.&amp;quot; And what's up with that statistic that claims that fewer prominent Americans have come out of the public school system since prayer was banned? There is absolutely no way that a claim like that can be tested, measured, or even looked at in a serious light. I vote to delete the section entirely. And mind you I have many, many friends who graduated from the public school system who are doing just fine, which is remarkable considering that I live in Los Angeles, which has one of the highest dropout rates in the country. I remember my mother still works at a particularly prominent school in Hollywood, and at the end of each year she takes several students who graduated out to lunch to congratulate them because it's such an achievement at some schools in the city. I don't think that has anything to do with prayer though (religious children fail to graduate just as often as secular ones). -[[User:Ilikecake|Ilikecake]] 17:04, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the worst section on an even worse page. The list of post and pre 1962 section should be thousands of pages long! I'm going to delete it. I know it's going to be put back in a couple minutes though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If you already believe something will be reverted when you begin to edit, that is a good indicator not to do so. Also please remember to sign your posts. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:59, 25 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Statistics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A few comments on the recently-added statistics:&lt;br /&gt;
:*Illegal drugs: The survey that statistic comes from includes both public and private schools. (See [http://monitoringthefuture.org/purpose.html])&lt;br /&gt;
:*Teen pregnancy: The number is for one city in Virginia, and makes no distinction between public school, private school, and homeschooled teens.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Obesity: A similar comment.  The number is for one school district.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mental health: According to [http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth/chapter3/sec1.html#table3_1 this] government website, an estimated 20% of people 9-17 years old have some sort of mental disorder.  Since the source for the &amp;quot;almost 10%&amp;quot; statistic (I think it would be better just to say 8%, by the way) doesn't say what exactly it means by &amp;quot;mental health issues,&amp;quot; there's really no way to determine what the significance of the number is.  Also, that number is for one school district.  It's not enough data to say the number applies to public school students in general.&lt;br /&gt;
:Usual disclaimers apply. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 20:34, 21 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Any study that includes public and private schools is going to be 90% public school, so the private school distinction is insignificant.  If anything, private schools are better, which makes the real public school statistic ''even worse'' than reported.  The teen pregnancy statistic is for public and private schools, not homeschoolers (where teen pregnancy rates are virtually 0).  The government estimate on mental health is interesting but does not change the school statistic.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 20:57, 21 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The teen pregnancy statistic is for all teens in the relevant area - which includes homeschoolers. (You can find the data from [http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/HealthStats/stats.asp#data this page] on the VA department of health's website.  Under &amp;quot;Data Tables,&amp;quot; pick either 2007 table from the Teenage Pregnancies drop-down box.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::*No, the estimate doesn't change the school statistic; however, it does change its significance.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*You have failed to address my comments regarding the samples.  Except for the illegal drugs statistic and the government mental health statistic, all the numbers I mentioned come from samples that were relatively small and not particularly diverse; you can't just assume those statistics are equal to those for the general public school population. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 21:06, 21 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: You only challenge 4 out of the 11 points, and one of your 4 (the obesity statistic) can hardly be disputed.  Just look at how fat public school kids are.  Maybe the statistic is slightly off, but I could find 5 stories in 60 seconds decrying the obesity in public school kids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: And that illustrates the problem with your comments.  You're not showing a genuine interest in the crisis when you deny facts that you could easily confirm yourself and improve the entry with additional references.  I'm not here to persuade someone determined not to be persuaded.  I already suggest to parents that they get their kids out of public school, and yet still try to help those stuck in the system and still look for ways to improve the system for the kids.  You, however, seem determined ''not'' to help.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 21:15, 21 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Because I don't challenge all of the statistics, my criticisms can't be taken seriously?  Also, note that all I deny is that you are correctly interpreting the statistics.  Finally, you still haven't responded to my comments regarding the samples. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 21:34, 21 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Where is your proof? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why did you insert that 77% statistic into the [[public school]] article? The article provided did not say that statistic. Where is your proof?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Metzky|Metzky]] 20:42, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Note: when stating &amp;quot;article&amp;quot; I mean the conservapedia article, but when I say &amp;quot;source&amp;quot;, I mean the source that is cited.&lt;br /&gt;
:After reading the sources from the statistics, I have a major problems with what the article is claiming to have evidence of:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:1.One source says &amp;quot;In 1991, 62 percent had used illicit drugs. In 2007, the number jumped to 77 percent.&amp;quot; (it is the link with the number &amp;quot;6&amp;quot;). However, this does '''not''' mean &amp;quot;77% do illegal drugs&amp;quot;, as stated in the article. It simply means that, at one point in their life, 77% '''have done''' drugs. The difference in verb tense makes a huge difference. Note that &amp;quot;have done&amp;quot; can be anything as small as having one drink ''in their entire life'' or smoking marijuana ''once''.&lt;br /&gt;
:2.I was unable to find where the pregnancy rate of 10% came from. I read the entire article sourced for the statistic twice and was unable to find it. The only thing close to it was &amp;quot;In a school of 2,211 students, there are at least 70 girls who are soon-to-be or already mothers.&amp;quot; This indicates a pregnancy rate of 3%, not 10%. Also, the statistic of about half getting abortions is not representative of the population, as there was only a sample size of 200 from Alexandria in Virginia.&lt;br /&gt;
:3.Also, the article sourced for &amp;quot;nearly 10% have mental health problems&amp;quot; specifically states in the second paragraph: &amp;quot;8 percent had mental health issues.&amp;quot; 10% and 8% are huge differences in the world of statistics. There is no problem with stating &amp;quot;8%&amp;quot;. Also, the study was on students in a Memphis school district. This means that the statistic is unable to be extrapolated to all of American public school students. Memphis students are not representative of the entire population of students, so no such claim is possible.&lt;br /&gt;
:4.The same goes for the 35% said to be obese. (Added in after originally posted &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#237923&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:WilliamBeason|William Beason]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:WilliamBeason|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:23, 2 January 2009 (EST))&lt;br /&gt;
:5.The same error just mentioned is committed when stating &amp;quot;20% go on dangerous &amp;quot;binge drinking,&amp;quot; and 50% drink illegally&amp;quot;. The statistic cited is for ''Ottowa County'' in Michigan. (not representative of the entire population)&lt;br /&gt;
:6.An even more egregious error is committed concerning the number of students who watch more than 3 hours of television. The national average that the source refers to '''is''' public school students. The 60% statistic is for ''Memphis'' students. The 35% is the national average for public school students.&lt;br /&gt;
:7.On bullying, the source states &amp;quot;Nationally, about 160,000 students miss school daily because they fear being bullied&amp;quot;. When checking this, the source is '''completely''' wrong:&lt;br /&gt;
::*http://www.cnn.com/2007/LIVING/personal/09/06/bullies/index.html&lt;br /&gt;
::If you want a source that is not CNN, then:&lt;br /&gt;
::*http://books.google.com/books?id=D_LpPNZt3iMC&amp;amp;pg=PA461&amp;amp;lpg=PA461&amp;amp;dq=160,000+students+bully+one+day+year&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=Ycyex5n4s6&amp;amp;sig=qlrlKQNjNIOScUryWSg048NbSlE&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;resnum=8&amp;amp;ct=result&lt;br /&gt;
:In reality, it is &amp;quot;Every year more than 160,000 students report missing some school because they are afraid.&amp;quot; (added after originally posted &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#237923&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:WilliamBeason|William Beason]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:WilliamBeason|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:32, 2 January 2009 (EST)) It is not ''every day'', but at least some every year. This includes simply ''being late'' in ''one day'' the entire year.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Overall, the sources seem to be taken from where public schools are doing the '''worst''' rather than average public schools. The sample sizes are extremely small and are taken specifically from the regions where public schools are doing the worst. These are not representative of how the entire public school system is doing. The statistics have either been gravely misinterpreted or are being misconstrued on purpose by the person who wrote that part of the article. The article is very misleading.&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope this is fixed soon. &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#237923&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:WilliamBeason|William Beason]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:WilliamBeason|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:19, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: In response to point 1 above, drugs are addictive.  Very few people do drugs only once.  In response to point 2 above, please realize that boys don't get pregnant, and half of pregnant high school girls get an [[abortion]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Guys, I stopped there.  Raise the quality of your criticisms, please, if you want a response.  And pick your best criticism rather than pretending that quantity is a substitute for quality.  It isn't.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 21:47, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::That's too bad.  Numbers six and seven seem valid, if not the others.  [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 22:00, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to help paint a clear statistical picture of US public schools, I'm ready to help. I know enough math (and logic) to keep both sides honest. But I'll tell you from the start, liberals are much more likely to make math errors and to believe what they want - than conservatives. The way they treat [[John Lott]] is a case in point. Another example is how many children &amp;quot;go to bed hungry each night&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Remember, the figures do not lie, but &amp;quot;liars figure&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:45, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm guessing a good place to start would be to read the points that Andy won't. [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 22:52, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: No, Liam, a good place to start is to admit the basic errors in the criticism and take steps to prevent recurrence of more errors like them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:54, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You already said you didn't read the whole thing.  You say the first two are flawed, ok.  But you literally can't know if there are errors in the rest.  [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 22:56, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I see your point in that my second point was flawed (I can't believe I forgot to take that into account), but that '''still only''' raises the pregnancy rate to 6%. This does not allow us to make the conclusion that there is a 10% pregnancy rate in '''all public schools'''. The statistic specifically applies to the school it was taken from because ''data was only taken from that particular school''.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Let me elaborate. In statistics, there is a rule that before making a statement about a ''population'' (every person the statistic is about) that &amp;quot;the sample must be representative of the population&amp;quot;. This means that samples for the statistic have to come from '''many''' locations. If data is ''not'' taken from many locations (that are relevant to the statistic), then the statistics develop '''bias''', or when the result given is not what is true in real life.&lt;br /&gt;
::::In context of my point about the 6% pregnancy rate, this means that it is O.K. for the result to be applied to where it came from: the Memphis school. There is no bias ''when taking it in that '''specific''' context''. However, when applying it to ''the entire country'', there is bias. Well, where does it come from? There wasn't bias when applying it to the school, so what is the problem with applying it to the entire country? Let me respond to those questions by giving an example:&lt;br /&gt;
::::*&amp;quot;A recent statistic showed that 1900 of 2000 randomly polled people in Washington D.C. are liberal. This means that 95% of ''the entire country'' is liberal.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::This is obviously '''completely''' incorrect. The only thing that the statisticians can deduce from that is that 95% of people who live ''in Washington D.C.'' are liberals. No information was taken from Texas, Kentucky, New York, Maine, California, Alaska, Florida, Oklahoma, etc.. Data can only be said to represent our country if it is taken from a variety of locations.&lt;br /&gt;
::::That is why I have a problem with a variety of the statistics: these were a ''local'' studies rather than ''national'' studies (except for bullying and drugs).&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thank you for taking the time to read this.  &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#237923&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:WilliamBeason|William Beason]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:WilliamBeason|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:36, 3 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You've got the cart before the horse, William. How about helping us with a series of articles on [[statistics]]? The elementary rules you mentioned should be outlined so clearly that all you'd have to do is refer readers to the article in question. (Absent that, your comments might take on a &amp;quot;lecturing&amp;quot; tone here.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:48, 3 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Being a teacher yourself, you may know of the &amp;quot;lecture reflex&amp;quot;. I'll take you up on your offer. &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#237923&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:WilliamBeason|William Beason]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:WilliamBeason|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:00, 3 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good. In the mean time ([[average|no pun intended]]), the [[teen pregnancy]] rate would seem to be 30 to 35 percent - not 10 percent. This is calculating pregnancies per girl (up to age 19) - not some annualized rate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But advocates on both sides of a [[social issue]] have been known to magnify or minimize a problem. Read [[Darrell Huff]]'s &amp;quot;[[How to Lie with Statistics]]&amp;quot; for some tips on how to fight back. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:04, 3 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Cutting in here for a moment to address Andy's point that 77% admitting to trying it once equates to 77% doing drugs routinely because drugs are addictive. It's not that black and white. Marijuana is not addictive. MDMA is not addictive. LSD is not addictive. And I can guarantee these three make up most of a student's drug intake.--[[User:RonAbdul|RonAbdul]] 16:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Textbook CBN story==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This might fit in here or some other article as an external link.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6bARRmEpH8 CBN story on Harvard University recommending anti-Israel, anti-European textbooks]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Great point.  Please add to this entry where you think best.  Thanks and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:08, 22 August 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Statistics, Sampling and The Truth ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally the statistics given are a good picture of public schools all over America.  What is to be gained by parsing the language to weaken the statement, obfuscate it, to make it appear they have better results than they do?  Oh, wait, I forgot that liberals want to hide from obvious truths!  Public schools are mostly cesspools. That a precious few excel doesn't alter reality. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:13, 1 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Source for 10% pregnancy rate? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the statistic that 10% of public school girls get pregnant is true, it's a very powerful statement about public schools. The source given doesn't include this fact, though. Pregnancy rates are deplorably high in public schools, but I can't find any sources that put the number as high as 10%. I need help finding a source on this. [[User:ChrisGT90|ChrisGT90]] 21:56, 10 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm getting some conflicting data on this as well. [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/USTPtrends.pdf This] (PDF file) states that in 2006, the teen pregnancy rate for ALL women was 71.5 in 1,000 (~7.2%). However, [http://www.livestrong.com/article/12504-teen-pregnancy-rates-usa/ This] article states that 1/3 of girls get pregnant before the age of 20. If the latter is the case, I would say that 10% pregnancy rate is an ''under-estimation'' given that most children are in the public school system. I'm still searching, though ... -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 22:09, 10 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I found a [http://cbs2chicago.com/local/Robeson.High.School.2.1251642.html source] that puts the pregnancy rate at about 14.375% among the girls at one high school, but we need something better before we can make a statement about public schools in general, as this school is hardly a typical example. I imagine that the distribution of pregnancy rates among public schools would resemble something of an inverse bell curve: a number of public schools (primarily urban ones) would have extremely high pregnancy rates while many others (mostly suburban/rural schools) would have very low pregnancy rates. There are probably relatively few schools that fall in the middle because there are very few schools that have an equal mix of students from the cultures, environments, etc. that lead to teen pregnancy.&lt;br /&gt;
::I bet a large number of the supposed 1/3 pregnancies comes from girls that are 19, and hence out of school. Also, that statistic for all women is actually for &amp;quot;all women between 15 and 19.&amp;quot; They slid that detail in at the top of the chart where it's not very noticeable. I don't know where the CDC gets its number, but there's a huge difference between 7% of girls between 15 and 19 getting pregnant and 33% of girls being pregnant before 20. I'm more inclined to believe the 7%; that number sounds much more reasonable and other data from the study makes sense as well. The CDC, on the other hand, is the same agency that continually warned us of the dangers of the imminent swine flu pandemic... that everyone with sense knew wasn't going to happen. [[User:ChrisGT90|ChrisGT90]] 22:54, 10 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The source given in the article says that birth/abortion rates among teens in Alexandria was about 50/50. The first source that JLauttamus provided gives data for the whole nation, and puts abortion rates at 32%. Neither source mentioned public schools, so we don't have any data on that. I'm going to add a citation needed tag to the article about the pregnancy rates, and research further into abortion rates. [[User:ChrisGT90|ChrisGT90]] 15:39, 14 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::All the evidence seems to point to a percentage even higher than 10%, so I don't see why the 10% estimate would be considered unacceptable for somehow being too high.  I wouldn't expect public schools to admit to this problem or for precise data to be available.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:35, 14 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::We don't really have any evidence to point to a particular number. We have a number from a ''single'' school (and an atypical one, at that) giving us about 14%. The only piece of data that evaluates the whole nation gives us about 7%, but that's just pregnancy rates among 15-19 year olds in general, and doesn't mention schooling at all. We could technically say that &amp;quot;One public school has a pregnancy rate of over 14% among its female students,&amp;quot; but that would be kind of weaselly. We don't have any evidence from which to draw conclusions about a typical public school or public schools as a whole. [[User:ChrisGT90|ChrisGT90]] 13:34, 16 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::If no source has been provided to back up this statistic, I'll remove it on June 24th. (Two weeks after this issue was raised.) [[User:ChrisGT90|ChrisGT90]] 22:55, 19 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 30% of public schools fail to graduate from high school? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found a rather major and embarrassing error in the opening lines. The list of statistics are said to be &amp;quot;characteristics of public schools&amp;quot; when they are in fact describing their students. I edited the heading sentence before the list to reflect this, but my edits were reversed, because &amp;quot;the public schools create the students.&amp;quot; I agree that we do need to find a way to emphasize this, but the error still needs removal. Any suggestions on how to accomplish both goals while keeping everyone happy? [[User:JimAB|JimAB]] 21:19, 27 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Jim, the schools teach and train the students.  That's what the schools are paid to do, at astronomical costs.  When someone refers to &amp;quot;public schools,&amp;quot; it does not mean merely the bricks in the buildings.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:49, 27 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::To me &amp;quot;public schools&amp;quot; refers to the lessons, the students, the teachers and the rubbish that is being taught. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:00, 27 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As 'schools' it doesn't make logical sense. I'll try and fix it. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 17:05, 9 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wolf&amp;diff=860580</id>
		<title>Wolf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wolf&amp;diff=860580"/>
		<updated>2011-04-08T05:07:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: Removed dead source, reworded to match existing sources&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Taxonomy|image = 480px-Canis lupus laying.jpg|kingdom = Animalia|phylum = Chordata|subphylum = Vertebrata|class = Mammalia|order = Carnivora|suborder = Caniformia  |family = Canidae|genus = Canis|species = C. lupus|}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Wolves''' are carnivorous animals of the genus ''Canis'', and consist of a single species, the gray or timber wolf (''Canis lupus'') of the northern hemisphere. Wolves are known for their intelligence, social structure, and hunting skills, yet despite being the primary ancestor of the domestic dog, the wolf has been the subject of persecution throughout history as a pest of livestock, a killer of humans, and the subject of evil in many tales of folklore, and often without a basis in fact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several other canids are also known by the name &amp;quot;wolf&amp;quot;. The Mexican wolf (''Canis lupus baileyi'') is considered by authorities to be a subspecies of the gray wolf; the red wolf (''Canis rufus'') of the southeastern [[United States]] continues to have some debate on whether it is a subspecies of the gray wolf or a distinct species in its own right.  Additionally, the coyote or prairie wolf (''Canis latrans'') of North America and the South American maned wolf (''Chrysocyon brachyurus'') bear the name as well but are not considered true wolves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
The wolf stands about 3 feet at the shoulder, and is about 5 feet in length from nose to tail; its weight is between 70 and 120 pounds.  Females are smaller than males, and wolves in higher latitudes are generaly larger than those further south.  The coat is bushy, generally grey in color, although some wolves have brown or red tinges; all-black or all-white wolves also appear in many packs.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Habitat==&lt;br /&gt;
Wolves live in a wide range of habitats, from arctic tundra to forest to prarie to desert.  Historically, the wolf ranged over much of the northern hemisphere, from central Mexico to the high arctic in North America, much of Europe, and much of Asia north of the Himalayas - one of the most widely-ranged land mammals on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Habits==&lt;br /&gt;
Very few wolves live as loners; the pack takes up much of their lives.  The pack consists of about ten animals divided into male and female heirarchies, which are led by the alphas.  Alphas, the oldest wolves in the pack, maintain their status through fighting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wolves use a great deal of recogizable body language, scent, and sounds to communicate with each other.  The position of tails relative to their bodies, lowering and exposure of their necks, the bearing of teeth can indicate submission or dominance to one another.  Territories are marked by urine or feces, and packs will defend them from others.  Howling is done communally, as a means to assemble, communicate with others, or as a hunting call at dusk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the pack is on the hunt, prey generally consists of large mammals - deer, caribou, moose - and the pack will cooperate with one another to catch and kill their target, which usually consists of a weak, old, or young animal.  They will also prey on smaller game, such as rodents or rabbits, and sometimes will scavenge carrion when no live prey is available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Reproduction====&lt;br /&gt;
Wolves are largely monogamous, and are sometimes considered to mate for life &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thewildones.org/Animals/grayWolf.html The Wild Ones; Gray Wolf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  though extra pair matings are common events&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wonderquest.com/animal-mate-for-life.htm Wonderquest; Animals that mate for life]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The alpha wolves in the pack do the actual breeding, which occurs in the spring; the pups are born two months later.  The average litter size is six, but sometimes more are born.  The pups open their eyes after nine days, with a gradual weaning to regurgitated meat within a month.  The pups stay within the den for their first six weeks, gradually coming out to explore and play at the end of that period; by their third month they learn to hunt, and are fully adult in eighteen months.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value to Man==&lt;br /&gt;
Attempts were made in the 1930s and thereafter to eliminate these animals as pests in the United States, particularly in [[Yellowstone National Park]], where it had been considered that stray wolves regularly fed upon livestock.  By the time they were included in the ''Red Data Book'' in 1973, they were severely restricted in range throughout North America and Europe, and classified as an endangered species.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, [[Alaska]] is the only state that permits control of wolf populations, due to the prolific reproduction rates in that isolated [[Arctic]] area.  Under the current policy, it is legal to shoot wolves from low flying airplanes, due to the state's very limited roads. Wolves and bears are very effective and efficient predators of caribou, moose, deer and other wildlife. In most of Alaska, humans also rely on the same species for food. In Alaska's Interior, predators kill more than 80% of the moose and caribou that die during an average year, while humans kill less than 10 percent. In most of the state, predation holds prey populations at levels far below what could be supported by the habitat in the area. Predation is an important part of the ecosystem, and all Alaska Department of Fish and Game wolf management programs, including control programs, are designed to sustain wolf populations in the future.  Currently (2009), five wolf control programs are underway that comprises about 9.4% of Alaska's total land area. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wildlife.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=wolf.control Wolf Control in Alaska; Alaska Dept. of Wildlife Conservation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wildlife.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=control.predator_prey Overview of Relationships Between Bears, Wolves, and Moose in Alaska]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Perceptions of Wolves====&lt;br /&gt;
To date there has been no known documented case of a healthy adult wolf killing a human being; normally, a pack of wolves are wary of man and tend to stay away.  Despite this, wolves have been cast as the villain throughout history, with the European legends of the [[werewolf]], the fairy tales of &amp;quot;The Three Pigs&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Little Red Riding Hood&amp;quot; being a few examples.  Other tales portray the wolf in a more favorable manner: the boy Mowgli being raised by a wolf in Rudyard Kipling's ''The Jungle Book'', and earlier, the twins Romulus and Remus saved and suckled by a she-wolf for many years before one of them founded the city of [[Rome]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Wolves in the Bible====&lt;br /&gt;
Wolves are mentioned several times in the [[Bible]], where they are typically used as exemplars of savagery. When Jesus sends out the [[Apostles]], he says,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.'' [[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 10:16 ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and Isaiah prophesies the New Earth,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent's meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the LORD.'' [[Isaiah (Biblical book)|Isaiah]] 65:25 (KJV)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Evolutionary claims==&lt;br /&gt;
The wolf is the ancestor of the domestic [[dog]]; DNA tests on several dog breeds (Alaskan malamute, Siberian husky, samoyed, and others) considered the oldest known revealed that they contained strands of wolf DNA [http://www.malmagic.com/History%20of%20the%20malamute.html].  Since even in the evolutionary view this is considered to have occurred in a relatively short time frame (as &amp;quot;little&amp;quot; as 15,000 years ago) this is one area where the views of [[YEC|Young earth creationists]] and evolutionists generally overlap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Never Cry Wolf]] - drama about a scientist who proved that wolves can live on rodents&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://mfile.akamai.com/27176/wmv/nationalpark.download.akamai.com/27176/prod/yell/photosmultimedia/video/insideyell/wmvs/256/0042a_coyote_or_wolf_256.asx Coyote or Wolf?], Videos © 2008 Yellowstone Association &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Nb_zl_canines}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canines]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biblical Animals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Planned_obsolescence&amp;diff=860154</id>
		<title>Talk:Planned obsolescence</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Planned_obsolescence&amp;diff=860154"/>
		<updated>2011-04-05T04:23:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* I disagree with the tone of this article, I think it needs a considerable rewrite. */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;This strategy is even readily admitted by the product developers themselves;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
I wouldn't call it a &amp;quot;strategy&amp;quot; of planned obsolescence to warn that a battery will not last for an infinite number of charge/discharge cycles. This should be reworded...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I disagree with the tone of this article, I think it needs a considerable rewrite. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obsolescence happens, it is an unavoidable result of improving technology and goods that aren't perfectly durable. One example in the article is the bateries in devices being soldered in, but there are good reasons for this, it literally improves the durability of the device and prevents damage. In order to compete these devices all need specialized batteries and the advantage of specialized batteries more than pays for the service costs associated with the occasional replacement. I've been using the same iPod since 2005 and I've seen a considerable reduction in battery life (associated with the number of cycles I've put on the Li-Poli battery) but my natural frugality has prevented me from upgrading, because it's got a tolerable level of obsolescence. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 00:23, 5 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=John_Maynard_Keynes&amp;diff=859782</id>
		<title>John Maynard Keynes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=John_Maynard_Keynes&amp;diff=859782"/>
		<updated>2011-03-30T20:37:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* Keynesian Economics */  added illuminating metaphor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Keynes.jpg|right|thumbnail|175px|John Maynard Keynes]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''John Maynard Keynes''' (5 June 1883 - 21 April 1946) was a [[British]] economist and one of the most influential intellectuals of the 20th century. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keynes was a founding father of modern theoretical [[macroeconomics]]. Breaking with the [[Neo-classical Economics|neoclassical]] orthodoxy of his era, Keynes argued that macroeconomic relationships differ from their [[Microeconomics|microeconomic]] counterparts. He went on to advocate government intervention into markets and proposed a demand-driven model for money. His theories formed the basis of what came to be known as [[Keynesian economics]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keynes rejected socialism--he did not want government to own or even control industry, but rather he wanted the government to optimize the economy though its &amp;quot;fiscal policies,&amp;quot; that is, taxes and spending.  He was a lifelong member of the [[British Liberal Party]], which held few seats in Parliament after 1920.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keynes was, with [[Milton Friedman]] one of the two most influential economists of the 20th century. Keynes, based at Cambridge University, influenced the economics profession in many ways and was surrounded by students and disciples. He was a major adviser to the Treasury during World War II and helped design the postwar &amp;quot;Bretton Woods&amp;quot; international monetary system. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keynes' most influential work was in [[Macroeconomics]], where his model of the nation economy emphasized fiscal policy (government spending and taxation) as more useful than regulation or monetary policy. He thus offered a non-socialist solution to the [[Great Depression]]. The Keynesian solutions were not accepted for many years, then they were widely adopted in the 1950s in Britain and the United States. Their popularity peaked in the 1960s, just as they came under heavy criticism from [[Milton Friedman]] and other conservatives for their theoretical weaknesses, and their inability in practice to deal with the economic crises of the 1970s in which high unemployment, high inflation, and slow growth coexisted. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keynes' ideas on dealing with an economy in deep recession or depression attracted increased attention in 2008-9, as the worldwide [[Recession of 2008]] proved increasingly resistant to solutions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotation|&amp;quot;When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?&amp;quot; [http://www.perc.org/articles/article894.php] }}&lt;br /&gt;
== Keynes, homosexuality  and pederasty ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''see also:'' [[Atheism, pederasty and NAMBLA]] and [[John Maynard Keynes and pederasty]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lytton Strachey, his male bed partner, wrote that Keynes was a “A [[liberal]] and a [[homosexuality|sodomite]], An [[atheism|atheist]] and a statistician.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Keynes and his friends made numerous trips to the resorts surrounding the Mediterranean.  At the resorts, little boys were sold by their families to bordellos which catered to [[homosexuality|homosexuals]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Keynes was a [[bisexual]] who married Lydia Lopokova. In his work ''The Cambridge Apostles, 1820-1914: Liberalism, Imagination, and Friendship in British Intellectual and Professional Life'', William C. Lubenow expresses the opinion that Keynes was an [[agnosticism|agnostic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Cambridge Apostles, 1820-1914: Liberalism, Imagination, and Friendship in British Intellectual and Professional Life, 1998, Cambridge University Press, page 402&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keynes, the son of a professor, was born in [[Cambridge]], and went on to attend [[Eton College]] where he excelled in mathematics, classics, and history. In 1902 he entered [[King's College, Cambridge]] to read for a degree in mathematics, however, due to his interest in politics he found himself increasingly drawn toward economics. It was at Cambridge that he found himself under the tutelage of [[Alfred Marshall]] and [[A.C. Pigou]]. Keynes accepted an economics lectureship at Cambridge funded personally by Marshall. Soon thereafter he took a leave of absence to work for the British Treasury, an institution in which his expertise was frequently called upon during the [[World War I|First World War]]. Indeed, at the end of the war, Keynes was selected to be the Treasury's principal representative at the [[Paris Peace Conference]] of 1919. The subsequent [[Treaty of Versailles]]  precipitated Keynes' resignation from the Treasury, as he felt it was draconian in its treatment of Germany.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He returned to Cambridge. His ''The Economic Consequences of Peace'' in 1920 was a highly influential slashing attack on the economic disasters that he said would be caused by the Versailles Treaty. He furthered these ideas in 1922 with ''A Revision of the Treaty'', in which he argued that the reparations that Germany was being forced to pay would lead to the collapse of the German economy. In 1923, the German economy entered a period of [[hyperinflation]], which Keynes had not predicted. Keynes found himself becoming increasingly involved in the political process. First supporting the [[British Liberal Party|Liberal Party's]] 1929 &amp;quot;Election Manifesto&amp;quot;, and later as an adviser to [[Ramsay MacDonald]]'s Labour government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keynes' ''magnum opus'' appeared in 1936, ''The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money''. Largely a reaction to the high unemployment that had characterised post-war Britain, the book was among the most revolutionary works of modern economics, signaling a paradigm shift within modern economic thought. As the era went on his prestige and celebrity grew, in 1942 he was made a lord. During the war he advised the Treasury and was Britain's lead representative at the 1944 [[Bretton Woods Conference]]. He died of a heart attack in 1946.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keynesian Economics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keynesianism centres around the concept of total spending within an economy, what Keynes terms [[aggregate demand]] and its effect upon output and inflation. In the eyes of Keynesians, the [[free market]] does not necessarily tend toward [[full employment]]. Periods such as this were witnessed in the 1930's during the [[Great Depression]], and in the eyes of Keynes could only be solved by increasing the level of expenditure within the economy. In order to do this Keynes advocated increasing government expenditure, frequently in the form of deficit spending, in order to extricate the economy from recession. At the same time Keynes argued that if expenditure within the economy was too high and the economy was at full employment then this would inevitably lead to inflation, as such in periods such as this Keynes advocated tax increases, and a reduction in government expenditure in order to &amp;quot;deflate&amp;quot; the economy. In Keynes view this can level off the peaks and fill in the valleys, solving the problem of depressions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As is evident, Keynesian thinking went on to influence the fiscal policy of many governments, as well as influencing a generation of economists. &amp;quot;We are all Keynesians now,&amp;quot; said President Richard Nixon in 1969.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keynesianism became the dominant policy in the U.S., Britain and Canada, and a few smaller countries, after 1945. The economic disciples were themselves too young to take much credit--not until the 1960s would they be top government advisers.  However Keynesianism suited the needs of many key players. To politicians it gave a formula that demonstrated they were doing something to avoid another Great Depression.  Liberals and labor welcomed the high government spending. Businessmen were relieved that Keynesianism a barrier to nationalization of industry  or government ownership and socialism. Indeed the Keynesians paid little attention to control or regulation of specific industries; that was unnecessary said the Keynesian model, because tax rates and government deficits or surpluses were paramount.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism of Keynes and Keynesian Economics==&lt;br /&gt;
By the 1970s  Keynesianism had run out of steam, and its theoretical model could not account for &amp;quot;stagflation&amp;quot; -- the simultaneous case of high inflation and slow growth that dragged on in the 1970s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New models from the [[Chicago School of Economics]] (led by [[Milton Friedman]]), were fresher and more appealing. [[Margaret thatcher]] in Britain and [[Ronald Reagan]] in the U.S. explicitly disavowed Keynesianism in favor of Chicago models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even in the 1930s Keynes was not without his critics, most notably [[Friedrich von Hayek]], whose critiques of Keynesian theory went on to form the basis of the [[Supply-side economics|Supply-side]], [[Monetarism|monetarist]], and [[Austrian School|Austrian School's]] objections to Keynesianism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Keynes was not a socialist, he poked fun at businessmen and was criticized by conservatives both during the [[Bretton Woods Conference]] and afterward for his pro big government stance. His policies about expanded government intervention were criticized for infringing on free markets. Libertarian opponents to Keynes argue that in the long run the [[invisible hand]] of the markets would correct any problem that would arise.  Keynes responded by noting, &amp;quot;In the long run, we are all dead.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Felix, David. ''Keynes: A Critical Life'' (1999) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/keynes-a-critical-life-by-david-felix.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Hutt, W. H. ''Keynesianism--Retrospect and Prospect: A Critical Restatement of Basic Economic Principles'' (1963) an attack on his theories by a conservative economist. [http://www.questia.com/library/book/keynesianism-retrospect-and-prospect-a-critical-restatement-of-basic-economic-principles-by-w-h-hutt.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Keynes, Milo, ed. ''Essays on John Maynard Keynes'', (1975)&lt;br /&gt;
* Harrod, Roy. ''The Life of John Maynard Keynes'', (1951)&lt;br /&gt;
* Moggridge, D. E. ''Maynard Keynes: An Economist's Biography'' (1995) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/maynard-keynes-an-economists-biography-by-d-e-moggridge.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* O'Donnell R. M. ''Keynes: Philosophy, Economics &amp;amp; Politics.'' (1989). &lt;br /&gt;
* Patinkin, Don. &amp;quot;Keynes, John Maynard&amp;quot;, in ''The [[New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics]]'', v. 2, 1987, pp. 19-41. &lt;br /&gt;
* Skidelsky, Robert.  ''John Maynard Keynes: Hopes Betrayed 1883-1920'', (1992), the standard scholarly biography [http://www.amazon.com/John-Maynard-Keynes-Betrayed-1883-1920/dp/014023554X/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1237121695&amp;amp;sr=8-5 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
** ''John Maynard Keynes: The Economist as Saviour 1920-1937'', (1994)&lt;br /&gt;
** ''John Maynard Keynes: Fighting for Britain 1937-1946'' (2001) [http://www.amazon.com/John-Maynard-Keynes-Fighting-1937-1946/dp/0670030228/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1237121695&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*** ''John Maynard Keynes: 1883-1946: Economist, Philosopher, Statesman'' (2005) Abridged edition; [http://www.amazon.com/John-Maynard-Keynes-1883-1946-Philosopher/dp/0143036157/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1237121695&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Skidelsky, Robert.  ''Keynes'' (1996), 144 pp &lt;br /&gt;
===Primary sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* Keynes John Maynard. ''The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes,'' 30 Vols., ed. by Sir Austin Robinson and Donald E. Moggridge. (1971-89).&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bios/Keynes.html John Maynard Keynes Biography] from ''The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics''&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.econlib.org/library/YPDBooks/Keynes/kynsCP.html J.M. Keynes, ''The Economic Consequences of Peace''] &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/keynes/general-theory/ J.M. Keynes ''The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money'']&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Keynes, John Maynard}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Economists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: British History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Finance]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Surrogate_measure&amp;diff=858695</id>
		<title>Surrogate measure</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Surrogate_measure&amp;diff=858695"/>
		<updated>2011-03-23T23:05:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: Created page with &amp;quot;A '''Surrogate measure''' is a measurement taken with the intent to gain insight into a variable that is either impractical to measure directly, or in principle impossible to mea...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''Surrogate measure''' is a measurement taken with the intent to gain insight into a variable that is either impractical to measure directly, or in principle impossible to measure. [[GDP]] per capita or [[PPP]] are common economic measures that have little meaning in and of themselves but provide insight into the wealth of a nation. In medicine a surrogate outcome measure such as the color of the lips and fingernail beds may be used to inexpensively and non-invasively judge the outcome of a heart surgery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With a direct and uncomplicated causal relationship surrogate measurements are as good as direct measurements, indeed a measurement taken with a ruler is really a measurement of the photons reflected by a ruler. Difficulty arises when the relationship is not a direct one but rather an illusory one. Physicians discovered in the 18th century that Salacilic acid used to treat fevers lead to gastrointestinal bleeding, and this was used as confirmation for the notion that blood loss lead to humoral balance and good health, and this encouraged blood letting. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ganfyd.org/index.php?title=Surrogate_outcome_measure Ganfyd- Surrogate Outcome Measure], retrieved 3-23-2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Secularized_Language&amp;diff=853209</id>
		<title>Talk:Secularized Language</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Secularized_Language&amp;diff=853209"/>
		<updated>2011-03-02T22:41:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* Washington's Birthday/President's Day */  Much better&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'd like to organize these into categories - not divided up, maybe - with secularized expressions at the top (e.g., Thank God =&amp;gt; thank goodness). Terms indicating a total shift of concept like Bible Study =&amp;gt; fundamentalism might come later. Everyone okay with this? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:43, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Sounds good to me!  How about giving it a try and let's see how it looks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:32, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::To be fair, many more conservative Christians (my mother, for example), use some of the so-called &amp;quot;secular expressions&amp;quot; because they take a strict line on taking the Lord's name in vain. She would, for example, rather not say &amp;quot;Thank God&amp;quot; unless she was quite literally thanking the deity. Indeed, I believe that is how the &amp;quot;thank goodness&amp;quot; construction originally evolved. --[[User:Jdixon|Jdixon]] 12:57, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That might well be, Jdixon--certainly, it's laudable to take seriously the commandment not to take the Lord's name in vain--but I don't think very many Christians would see a heartfelt &amp;quot;Thank God!&amp;quot; as inappropriate in many circumstances.  Thus, while your mother's conscientiousness is admirable, I don't think such conscientiousness is a sufficient explanation for the systematic removal of religious language from the public square.  Certainly, I think that some people choose &amp;quot;Thank goodness&amp;quot; out of a concern for propriety, but I think many more choose it out of a desire to avoid giving offense, or simply because it's what they're most used to hearing.  Perhaps a section on differing reasons for using these terms could be included in the article; after all, this is supposed to be an examination of the issue.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 13:34, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Washington's Birthday/President's Day ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While this is a case of P.C., it's not a case of secularized language. Last I checked, George Washington was not a sacred personage. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 13:47, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Washington was a prominent Christian whose habit of praying and appealing to God for assistance is well-known.  He was a kind of saint, and the downplaying of his (indisputable) significance is due to his Christianity.  If he had been an atheist then you'd see the opposite effect.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:20, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What kind of a saint was George Washington? --[[User:JohannesZ|JohannesZ]] 15:52, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The kind that wins wars.  There have been other examples.  Have you ever heard of [[Joan of Arc]]?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:02, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Canonized in 1920, right? When did the Church recognize Washington as a saint? [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:17, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::@Andy: Aye. She still needed miracles credited to her. [http://www.stjoan-center.com/novelapp/joaap04.html] --[[User:JohannesZ|JohannesZ]] 16:20, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I don't think all Christian churches have the same rules.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:23, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Undoubtedly. So which churches DO recognize Washington as a saint or other type of sacred being? [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:26, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Perhaps the church of Satan does, or perhaps atheists simply dislike Washington.  Wouldn't that be enough to explain the misnaming of the holiday as described in the entry?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:31, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm pretty sure that The Church of Satan does not acknowledge George Washington as divine. If there's any evidence -- a tract from an angry atheist decrying a celebration of the Christian Washington and demanding a holiday that accommodates the Presidents that were not Christians, I've yet to find one. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:37, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Marty, bias doesn't work that way.  You're not likely to find such an angry tract about ''any'' of the items on the list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Atheistic bias, like other forms of bias, seeks to downplay and minimize Christianity.  Washington was a leading, accomplished Christian.  Lincoln far less so, other presidents even lesser still, and the office of president not Christian at all.  An atheistic bias pushes language from the Christian recognition to the more atheistic substitute.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:15, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I agree with Andy here; the greater the Christianity of an historical figure, the more the atheistic revisionists will try to downplay his significance.  [[User:PeterUker|PeterUker]] 18:24, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::: How can President's Day even be considered remotely secularized as it was never a religiously themed event to begin with? The reason we have President's Day is due to the hesitation and the unwillingness of conservatives in the southeast to celebrate Lincoln's birthday as vilified he was as in infringing on &amp;quot;state's rights,&amp;quot; and removing their &amp;quot;Peculiar institution.&amp;quot; This contrasts to other locations in the country who celebrated both Washington's birthday and Lincoln's birthday in two different events. Furthermore, the Federal Government was disinterested in granting two Monday's off for federal employees, so came the compromise of celebrating a day between Lincoln's and Washington's birthday.[[User:JustinU|JustinU]] 21:46, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: Lincoln never had a stature comparable to Washington, and it's not merely because southerners disliked Lincoln.  The attempt to equate Lincoln to Washington as a joint federal holiday was a farce and never got off the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: But atheists downplay Washington just as they downplay other accomplished Christians.  It's irrelevant whether the holiday was ever &amp;quot;religiously themed.&amp;quot;  A day honoring a prominent Christian has been diluted and even misnamed.  It's the same secularization seen in replacing &amp;quot;Merry Christmas&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;Happy Holidays.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:27, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::: Mr. Aschlafly, I am unsure if you are purposefully misapplying my point so that your argument appears to be stronger, but I feel that your point is less than successively argued. In fact, the reason that Lincoln is trumpeted as being one of the greatest Presidents to have ever had the honor of holding the office is because, pointedly, history holds him comparable to George Washington in regards to leadership and vision for the country. I am also at ends with your rather presuming statement of Washington's Christianity, considering the well documented Enlightenment-era beliefs he held associated with his principles as a Freemason, a largely deist organization.[[User:JustinU|JustinU]] 00:44, 23 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::JustinU, it is well documented in Washington's own writings as well as the writings of those who knew him that he was a committed Christian within the Episcopalian Church.  The &amp;quot;deist&amp;quot; allegation is from the late-20th century only.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:57, 23 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:C&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;log-dancer.gif|thumbnail|right|150px|Maybe we should have a annual parade for St. George Washington like we do for St. Patrick. :)]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia correctly declares and supports the doctrine that every true Christian believer is a saint.[http://eastonsbibledictionary.com/saints.htm] The [[Apostle Paul]] wrote: &amp;quot;Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, to the &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''saints'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; which are at Ephesus, and to the faithful in Christ Jesus: Grace be to you, and peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ. Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will, To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved.&amp;quot; (Ephesians 1: 1-6)  Washington appears to have been a true Christian.[http://www.christiananswers.net/q-wall/wal-g011.html]  Therefore, George Washington was a saint. Maybe we should have a annual parade for St. George Washington like we do for St. Patrick. :) [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 04:33, 23 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A few questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few of the words here don't really seem to fit in the list.&lt;br /&gt;
For example:&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Resurrection Sunday''' -&amp;gt; '''Easter'''&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Easter&amp;quot; does have pagan origins, but the Pope says &amp;quot;Easter Sunday&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;Resurrection Sunday&amp;quot; - see[http://www.vatican.va/liturgical_year/liturgico_en/easter.html] and [http://www.vatican.va/news_services/liturgy/calendar/ns_liturgy_calendar_en.html#APRIL_2011]. In fact, a Google search of the Vatican website doesn't find &amp;quot;Resurrection Sunday&amp;quot; at all, except a few times with commas in between.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Washington's Birthday''' -&amp;gt; '''President's Day'''&lt;br /&gt;
::It's not secularization as far as I can tell. And President's Day honors Lincoln as well. Silly political correctness, maybe. Secularization, no.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pagan''' -&amp;gt; '''Secular'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Pagan usually refers to belief in multiple gods, while secular refers to something separate from religion (e.g. the Turkish government is secular because there is no state religion).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''God bless you''' -&amp;gt; '''Gesundheit'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Gesundheit is what Germans have always said after a sneeze. Many European countries have the same kind of response. Nobody ever says &amp;quot;God bless you&amp;quot; in German. &amp;quot;Gesundheit&amp;quot; is as old as &amp;quot;God bless you&amp;quot;, and the people who say it got the idea from German-Americans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:DouglasL|DouglasL]] 14:18, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pagan definition: one who has little or no religion. Secular definition: not overtly or specifically religious. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:31, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Merriam-Webster Online: [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pagan?show=0&amp;amp;t=1298483529 Pagan] [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/secular Secular]&lt;br /&gt;
::The first definition for &amp;quot;pagan&amp;quot; is ''a follower of a polytheistic religion'' - notice &amp;quot;polytheistic religion&amp;quot;. Secular is ''not overtly or specifically religious''. There's a difference, and in order to claim that &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot; is a redefinition of &amp;quot;pagan&amp;quot; you have to completely ignore the ''first'' definition of &amp;quot;pagan&amp;quot;. There's probably another word that could be used as the precursor of &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot; (Atheist?), but it's not &amp;quot;pagan&amp;quot;. [[User:DouglasL|DouglasL]] 12:58, 23 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::To clarify: I '''do''' think that the word &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot; and maybe &amp;quot;pagan&amp;quot; belong on this list, but not together. Maybe &amp;quot;atheist&amp;quot; -&amp;gt; &amp;quot;secular&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;pagan&amp;quot; -&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Wiccan&amp;quot; or such? [[User:DouglasL|DouglasL]] 18:28, 23 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Saint's Days ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Valentine's Day is no longer officially the feast day for St. Valentine, which definitely explains on some level why the &amp;quot;St&amp;quot; has been dropped from the name. February 14th is now the feast day for Cyril and Methodius, this changed in 1969 under Pope Paul the V, I think. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Paddy for St. Patrick's Day makes logical sense in that Paddy is a celtic diminutive for Padrig, which is Anglicized to Patrick. I've never actually heard it as Paddy's Day, I've always heard it as &amp;quot;St. Paddy's Day&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Resurrection Sunday has been called Easter since at the very least the AD 600s. St. Bede's ''Ecclesiastical History of the English People'' written in the early 700s refers to it as Easter, although he does admit it is tied to the Pagan festival of Eostre he still uses the term Easter. I don't think it is logical to use Easter as an example of modern society trying to erase Christian influence from daily life, I think it is simply a continuation of a name that is well over 1,000 years old. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
just my thoughts, good luck.--[[User:IScott|IScott]] 19:13, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Interesting comments, but they don't contradict the observation of bias.  Practicing Catholics are a small minority in the United States and Western Europe, so the relevance of the Church's changing of the feast day for St. Valentine hardly seems dispositive.  As to your second point, the &amp;quot;logical sense&amp;quot; is very strained in denying credit where it is due.  As to your third point, Christians refer to Easter as Resurrection Sunday to this day, just fewer of them.  And there was bias in 600 A.D. too.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:13, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I too have never heard paddy's day, it is always proceeded by the &amp;quot;St.&amp;quot;. While catholics may be a minority in the west one exception to that is Ireland (the only country in the EU with out abortion) and I think the secular consciousness still associates Ireland with Catholicism. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 21:50, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree that the actual Saint's days have been marginalized, and that the meaning of the holidays hold almost no religious meaning anymore. Irish-Americans celebrate St. Patrick's Day not as a saint's feast but as a day to meaninglessly celebrate their Irish-ness and dye rivers green and over-indulge in drinking alcohol, and Valentine's Day is a day to celebrate love and has very little to do with the old saint's feast.&lt;br /&gt;
: However, I stand firm on my third point, I find it highly unlikely that '''Saint Bede''', venerated in both the Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion, who is also considered a '''Doctor of the Church''' to be biased towards an unchristian term. In the 700s Bede refers to it as Easter and it has been called Easter by the English people and English speakers since at least then. For well over 1,000 years the majority of devout English Christians have called it Easter, and thus its use cannot be a modern attempt to try to obscure Christian origins.--[[User:IScott|IScott]] 23:22, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree that the use of Easter is not a ''modern'' secularization, but I still wonder whether its use was influenced by pagan tendencies in the first millennium.  I have no quarrel with Saint Bede but am not sure he named it.  He may well have been an expert about God but that does not make one an expert about bias.  Quite the contrary:  Jesus said the people of [[faith]] do not quickly recognize the tricks of the worldly.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:45, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small correction about one of my role models.  Bede is not a saint although, as IScott pointed out, he is a Doctor of the Church.  His tomb, in Durham Cathedral, is worth a visit! [[User:Rafael|Rafael]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for correcting that!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 01:05, 1 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't mean to be harsh, but you are mistaken Rafael, Bede is a Saint. He is often refered to as just &amp;quot;the venerable&amp;quot; but he is a Saint so I can see where you might be confused. He is venerated in the Anglican Communion as well as the Roman Catholic Church. Even Conservapedia's own entry on [[Bede]] has an icon that says &amp;quot;St. Bede.&amp;quot; Furthermore a google search of Saint Bede shows that there are a variety of churches named in his honor, in Williamsburg, VA there is a Catholic Church called St. Bede's Catholic Church, as well as an Anglican Church of St. Bede in Scarborough, ON, Canada, and a variety of churches and Parish schools in England. In the Episcopal Church Bede's feast day is May 25th. Bede is very much a Saint. Hope that clears up the Sainthood of Bede!--[[User:IScott|IScott]] 16:42, 2 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Perversion diversity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I understand it this is a list of words that are backward compatible to former religious meanings. We could stop saying Happy Holidays as a society and say Merry Christmas. I'd hate to think of what bigots we would appear to be if we started calling diversity perversion. &amp;quot;Have a lot of people off all different races, creeds, and colors working at your company, you are perverted!&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;A black man marrying a white woman, that's a perverted couple!&amp;quot; Since I doubt that anyone here thinks that way (and if they do maybe they should find somewhere else to be) then I think that should be pulled from the list for now. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 20:01, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'Diversity' is a word used often by liberals and others who push the [[homosexual agenda]], claiming that ongoing [[homosexualization]] is in the name of diversity.  As a conservative and one who reads the Bible daily, I find same-sex marriage perverse, yet liberals such as yourself would refer to such things as diverse.  Hence, your non-sequiturs aside, I feel the entry should remain.  [[User:PeterUker|PeterUker]] 20:10, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::A) You didn't address my point&lt;br /&gt;
::B) Perversion isn't a religious word any more than right and wrong. Are math teachers helping to keep Christianity vibrant and alive by assigning problems which are later graded as right and wrong?&lt;br /&gt;
::C) How ever often you claim to read the bible doesn't really matter here. This is the internet, anyone can claim to read the bible. however much they want. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 20:32, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'd have to weigh in with [[User:AlaskanEconomy|AE]] on this. Although, specifically, &amp;quot;diversity&amp;quot; is ''becoming'' a by-word, diversity is an [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/diversity old word] and refers to more than ''just'' homosexualization, by keeping it as is '''gives''' those advocates legitimacy and (in the end) we end up losing a serviceable word. [[User:DevonJ|DevonJ]] 21:06, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::We could make several categories of terms which have normal vs. liberal counterparts. Not all such pairs are examples of secularization. Some merely reflect the liberal worldview. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:57, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Diversity is more an example of liberals distorting the meaning of a word, the way I see it. I wouldn't call the original meaning of &amp;quot;diversity&amp;quot; an example of perversion, but advocates of the homosexual agenda ''try'' to make it into a different word. [[User:DouglasL|DouglasL]] 18:40, 23 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dead/Passed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not quite sure this fits.  While &amp;quot;passed&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;passed on&amp;quot; is certainly a euphemism for &amp;quot;dead,&amp;quot; surely it carries with it the connotation of passing on to God's judgment?  It seems to me like, if anything, &amp;quot;dead&amp;quot; is the more atheist-friendly term, since they're fond of claiming that once you're dead, you're dead.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 22:52, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You seem to be correct, perish-&amp;gt;dead maybe? Do what you feel is right.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:57, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Use of Christian Language in non-Religious Context ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the introduction to this page, the list is supposed to contain Christian expressions that have been replaced by secular expressions. But some examples are Christian expressions that are being used in non-Religious context. (Examples on this page include &amp;quot;Saintly&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;Well-behaved&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Angelic&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;Pretty.&amp;quot; Other examples I thought of are &amp;quot;Oh my God!&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;Oh no!&amp;quot; and calling something &amp;quot;divine&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;delicious&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;in excellent taste.&amp;quot;) Maybe this page can have one list of Christian expressions that are being replaced with different secular terms, and one list that contains Christian expressions that have been inappropriately adopted by the secular crowd for non-religious use. Does this make sense? Or do you think this all belongs in the same list? --[[User:Toadaron|Toadaron]] 12:25, 24 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gesundheit means &amp;quot;God Bless you!&amp;quot; in German==&lt;br /&gt;
Gesundheit litterally translates to &amp;quot;God Bless you!&amp;quot; in German. I don't think there is any malice or Secularized Language in this phrase. I think it was just a custom started by German-American Immigrants that caught on. As a descendant of German-American immigrants I feel obliged to point this out. Thank you, --[[User:Davidkon|Davidkon]] 14:30, 24 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:As a speaker of German, I can tell you that Gesundheit means &amp;quot;Health&amp;quot;. Gott segne dich! [[User:EricAlstrom|EricAlstrom]] 15:03, 24 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry to disagree with you, Davidkon, but &amp;quot;geshundheit&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;good health&amp;quot; as this entry[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gesundheit] states.  The German word for God is &amp;quot;Gott&amp;quot;, and this word is not part of gesundheit.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:07, 24 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I made a start at the categories Ed suggested, and organized the terms alphabetically within each category.  I did remove the example of &amp;quot;Jesus!&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Gee whiz!&amp;quot;, as I really think that's primarily a case of people trying not to use the Lord's name in a profane fashion.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 13:10, 26 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your improvements are superb.  But I didn't know that &amp;quot;Gee whiz&amp;quot; was a secularization of &amp;quot;Jesus&amp;quot;!  I'd be inclined to leave that in for informative purposes, even though you're reason for deleting it is probably.  Perhaps with a footnote?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:19, 26 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I can certainly see your point as far as the informative value, and this isn't, after all, just supposed to be an article about language that was secularized for malicious reasons.  It seems like we really do need a section exploring possible reasons for the secularization of language, and the ways in which even benign motives can contribute to the trend.   --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 15:20, 26 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hmm...that being the case, should similar euphemistic alterations like &amp;quot;Jeepers Creepers&amp;quot; be added in, too?  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 15:23, 26 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: You win.  Let's keep that junk out.  :-) --[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:45, 26 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Government ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
I was wondering wondering what the rational of &amp;quot;State -&amp;gt; Government&amp;quot;, along with &amp;quot;Govern -&amp;gt; Rule&amp;quot;. I don't particularly see how either is Christian or secular, and beyond that, it seems like these to contradict each other. Just wanting to hear some thoughts. [[User:EricAlstrom|EricAlstrom]] 18:52, 26 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Seems straightforward: the more atheistic one is, the more he views government as the church, and officials in government as rulers.  In contrast, the term &amp;quot;state&amp;quot; includes the people (e.g., &amp;quot;State of Rhode Island&amp;quot;), and governing connotes an element of service rather than purely ruling.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:04, 26 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christmas/Xmas ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to point out that the English letter X looks exactly like the Greek letter Chi, which is the first letter of 'Christ' in Greek. That is the origin of 'Xmas' and it is not an attempt to take Christ out. I submit that 'Xmas' should be removed from this list.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Lordofthemarsh|Lordofthemarsh]] 11:51, 2 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's a slippery slope: referring the &amp;quot;X&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Christ&amp;quot;. Let's keep it in for now. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Eventually, we can expand this topic, branching out to all sorts of language differences between conservatives and liberals. The religious-secular division is just one such difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:By the way, I'd prefer you to use your real name (unless Andy has given you specific permission to use a pseudonym). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:50, 2 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The transliteration of Christ in Greek is Χριστός, for what it is worth.&lt;br /&gt;
::I thought the point of the article was how we all talk about the same things but that the sacredness has been removed by substituting a synonym to remove the holiness of the original words.&lt;br /&gt;
::I suppose, conversely, one could make the point that LORD is a &amp;quot;secularized&amp;quot; version of the tetragrammaton. This was done for the reason that YHWH was too sacred to be uttered. [[User:DevonJ|DevonJ]] 17:37, 2 March 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Creative_destruction&amp;diff=853203</id>
		<title>Creative destruction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Creative_destruction&amp;diff=853203"/>
		<updated>2011-03-02T22:25:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: This is a major part of non-keynesian economics&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Creative destruction''' according to [[Investopedia]] is a &amp;quot;term coined by [[Joseph Schumpeter]] in his work entitled ''&amp;quot;Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy&amp;quot;'' (1942) to denote a &amp;quot;process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/creativedestruction.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Investopedia gives the following explanation of the economic benefit of creative destruction:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Creative destruction occurs when something new kills something older. A great example of this is personal computers. The industry, led by Microsoft and Intel, destroyed many mainframe computer companies, but in doing so, entrepreneurs created one of the most important inventions of this century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/creativedestruction.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==In economics==&lt;br /&gt;
Creative destruction is the force through which new innovations (or old innovations after conditions change) topple entrenched interests. While there is an amount of destruction (it is very rare to find a buggy whip manufacturer) the increased efficiency leads to increased resources, and the benefits far outweigh the costs. Creative destruction is a major component of the [[invisible hand]] and interfering with creative destruction lead to development of [[Value negative firms]] and the death by ignorance experienced by the soviet union.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Videos:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDMNYLiBexo Ben Wattenberg's Corporate Graveyard Scene from &amp;quot;In Search of the Real America&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZL4b38P9n0 Creative destruction]&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Discretionary_spending&amp;diff=853202</id>
		<title>Discretionary spending</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Discretionary_spending&amp;diff=853202"/>
		<updated>2011-03-02T22:03:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Spending ([[budget authority]] and [[outlays]]) controlled in annual [[appropriation|appropriations]] [[act|acts]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.senate.gov/reference/glossary_term/discretionary_spending.htm] US Senate Reference&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The political philosopher and journalist [[George Will]] contends that all government spending is discretionary spending with the exception of debt service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2011/02/george_will_on.html Econtalk], George will, Feb-28-2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senate Terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rule_of_Law&amp;diff=853201</id>
		<title>Rule of Law</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rule_of_Law&amp;diff=853201"/>
		<updated>2011-03-02T21:59:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Rule of Law''' is a fundamental [[conservative]] principle underlying the [[Magna Carta]], the [[Declaration of Independence]], the [[U.S. Constitution]], and a political philosophy.  In essence it entails that no person is above the rule of law, and that the law is to be applied equally to all. Some countries openly breach the rule of law (such as [[Zimbabwe]] with its denial of basic human rights). Others such as [[Australia]] and [[USA|America]] promote the ideology of equality before the law, however there have been cases where this has not occurred (for example in Australia the Wood Royal Commission of 1995 found that police officers were not being properly investigated for cases of [[perjury]], and hence were acting above the law).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[St. Paul]]'s discussion of the &amp;quot;law&amp;quot; in [[Romans 1-8 (Translated)|Romans 7-8]] may have influenced the development and confidence in '''Rule of Law''' as the basis for a civilized society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] has been the leading advocate of adherence to '''Rule of Law'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the government expands the rule of law contracts, because congress stops passing laws and starts passing sentiments (&amp;quot;we should have clean air&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;we should have adequate schools&amp;quot;, etc.) and handing the process of developing rules becomes the domain of the bureaucrat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2011/02/george_will_on.html Econtalk], George will, Feb-28-2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/rule-of-law/ What Liberals Say - Category: Rule of Law], [[Accuracy In Media]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:philosophy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Secularized_Language&amp;diff=851552</id>
		<title>Talk:Secularized Language</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Secularized_Language&amp;diff=851552"/>
		<updated>2011-02-23T02:50:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* The Saint's Days */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'd like to organize these into categories - not divided up, maybe - with secularized expressions at the top (e.g., Thank God =&amp;gt; thank goodness). Terms indicating a total shift of concept like Bible Study =&amp;gt; fundamentalism might come later. Everyone okay with this? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:43, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Sounds good to me!  How about giving it a try and let's see how it looks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:32, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::To be fair, many more conservative Christians (my mother, for example), use some of the so-called &amp;quot;secular expressions&amp;quot; because they take a strict line on taking the Lord's name in vain. She would, for example, rather not say &amp;quot;Thank God&amp;quot; unless she was quite literally thanking the deity. Indeed, I believe that is how the &amp;quot;thank goodness&amp;quot; construction originally evolved. --[[User:Jdixon|Jdixon]] 12:57, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That might well be, Jdixon--certainly, it's laudable to take seriously the commandment not to take the Lord's name in vain--but I don't think very many Christians would see a heartfelt &amp;quot;Thank God!&amp;quot; as inappropriate in many circumstances.  Thus, while your mother's conscientiousness is admirable, I don't think such conscientiousness is a sufficient explanation for the systematic removal of religious language from the public square.  Certainly, I think that some people choose &amp;quot;Thank goodness&amp;quot; out of a concern for propriety, but I think many more choose it out of a desire to avoid giving offense, or simply because it's what they're most used to hearing.  Perhaps a section on differing reasons for using these terms could be included in the article; after all, this is supposed to be an examination of the issue.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 13:34, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Washington's Birthday/President's Day ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While this is a case of P.C., it's not a case of secularized language. Last I checked, George Washington was not a sacred personage. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 13:47, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Washington was a prominent Christian whose habit of praying and appealing to God for assistance is well-known.  He was a kind of saint, and the downplaying of his (indisputable) significance is due to his Christianity.  If he had been an atheist then you'd see the opposite effect.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:20, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What kind of a saint was George Washington? --[[User:JohannesZ|JohannesZ]] 15:52, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The kind that wins wars.  There have been other examples.  Have you ever heard of [[Joan of Arc]]?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:02, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Canonized in 1920, right? When did the Church recognize Washington as a saint? [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:17, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::@Andy: Aye. She still needed miracles credited to her. [http://www.stjoan-center.com/novelapp/joaap04.html] --[[User:JohannesZ|JohannesZ]] 16:20, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I don't think all Christian churches have the same rules.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:23, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Undoubtedly. So which churches DO recognize Washington as a saint or other type of sacred being? [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:26, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Perhaps the church of Satan does, or perhaps atheists simply dislike Washington.  Wouldn't that be enough to explain the misnaming of the holiday as described in the entry?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:31, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm pretty sure that The Church of Satan does not acknowledge George Washington as divine. If there's any evidence -- a tract from an angry atheist decrying a celebration of the Christian Washington and demanding a holiday that accommodates the Presidents that were not Christians, I've yet to find one. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:37, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Marty, bias doesn't work that way.  You're not likely to find such an angry tract about ''any'' of the items on the list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Atheistic bias, like other forms of bias, seeks to downplay and minimize Christianity.  Washington was a leading, accomplished Christian.  Lincoln far less so, other presidents even lesser still, and the office of president not Christian at all.  An atheistic bias pushes language from the Christian recognition to the more atheistic substitute.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:15, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I agree with Andy here; the greater the Christianity of an historical figure, the more the atheistic revisionists will try to downplay his significance.  [[User:PeterUker|PeterUker]] 18:24, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::: How can President's Day even be considered remotely secularized as it was never a religiously themed event to begin with? The reason we have President's Day is due to the hesitation and the unwillingness of conservatives in the southeast to celebrate Lincoln's birthday as vilified he was as in infringing on &amp;quot;state's rights,&amp;quot; and removing their &amp;quot;Peculiar institution.&amp;quot; This contrasts to other locations in the country who celebrated both Washington's birthday and Lincoln's birthday in two different events. Furthermore, the Federal Government was disinterested in granting two Monday's off for federal employees, so came the compromise of celebrating a day between Lincoln's and Washington's birthday.[[User:JustinU|JustinU]] 21:46, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A few questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few of the words here don't really seem to fit in the list.&lt;br /&gt;
For example:&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Resurrection Sunday''' -&amp;gt; '''Easter'''&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Easter&amp;quot; does have pagan origins, but the Pope says &amp;quot;Easter Sunday&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;Resurrection Sunday&amp;quot; - see[http://www.vatican.va/liturgical_year/liturgico_en/easter.html] and [http://www.vatican.va/news_services/liturgy/calendar/ns_liturgy_calendar_en.html#APRIL_2011]. In fact, a Google search of the Vatican website doesn't find &amp;quot;Resurrection Sunday&amp;quot; at all, except a few times with commas in between.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Washington's Birthday''' -&amp;gt; '''President's Day'''&lt;br /&gt;
::It's not secularization as far as I can tell. And President's Day honors Lincoln as well. Silly political correctness, maybe. Secularization, no.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pagan''' -&amp;gt; '''Secular'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Pagan usually refers to belief in multiple gods, while secular refers to something separate from religion (e.g. the Turkish government is secular because there is no state religion).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''God bless you''' -&amp;gt; '''Gesundheit'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Gesundheit is what Germans have always said after a sneeze. Many European countries have the same kind of response. Nobody ever says &amp;quot;God bless you&amp;quot; in German. &amp;quot;Gesundheit&amp;quot; is as old as &amp;quot;God bless you&amp;quot;, and the people who say it got the idea from German-Americans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:DouglasL|DouglasL]] 14:18, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pagan definition: one who has little or no religion. Secular definition: not overtly or specifically religious. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:31, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Saint's Days ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Valentine's Day is no longer officially the feast day for St. Valentine, which definitely explains on some level why the &amp;quot;St&amp;quot; has been dropped from the name. February 14th is now the feast day for Cyril and Methodius, this changed in 1969 under Pope Paul the V, I think. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Paddy for St. Patrick's Day makes logical sense in that Paddy is a celtic diminutive for Padrig, which is Anglicized to Patrick. I've never actually heard it as Paddy's Day, I've always heard it as &amp;quot;St. Paddy's Day&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Resurrection Sunday has been called Easter since at the very least the AD 600s. St. Bede's ''Ecclesiastical History of the English People'' written in the early 700s refers to it as Easter, although he does admit it is tied to the Pagan festival of Eostre he still uses the term Easter. I don't think it is logical to use Easter as an example of modern society trying to erase Christian influence from daily life, I think it is simply a continuation of a name that is well over 1,000 years old. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
just my thoughts, good luck.--[[User:IScott|IScott]] 19:13, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Interesting comments, but they don't contradict the observation of bias.  Practicing Catholics are a small minority in the United States and Western Europe, so the relevance of the Church's changing of the feast day for St. Valentine hardly seems dispositive.  As to your second point, the &amp;quot;logical sense&amp;quot; is very strained in denying credit where it is due.  As to your third point, Christians refer to Easter as Resurrection Sunday to this day, just fewer of them.  And there was bias in 600 A.D. too.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:13, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I too have never heard paddy's day, it is always proceeded by the &amp;quot;St.&amp;quot;. While catholics may be a minority in the west one exception to that is Ireland (the only country in the EU with out abortion) and I think the secular consciousness still associates Ireland with Catholicism. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 21:50, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Perversion diversity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I understand it this is a list of words that are backward compatible to former religious meanings. We could stop saying Happy Holidays as a society and say Merry Christmas. I'd hate to think of what bigots we would appear to be if we started calling diversity perversion. &amp;quot;Have a lot of people off all different races, creeds, and colors working at your company, you are perverted!&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;A black man marrying a white woman, that's a perverted couple!&amp;quot; Since I doubt that anyone here thinks that way (and if they do maybe they should find somewhere else to be) then I think that should be pulled from the list for now. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 20:01, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'Diversity' is a word used often by liberals and others who push the [[homosexual agenda]], claiming that ongoing [[homosexualization]] is in the name of diversity.  As a conservative and one who reads the Bible daily, I find same-sex marriage perverse, yet liberals such as yourself would refer to such things as diverse.  Hence, your non-sequiturs aside, I feel the entry should remain.  [[User:PeterUker|PeterUker]] 20:10, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::A) You didn't address my point&lt;br /&gt;
::B) Perversion isn't a religious word any more than right and wrong. Are math teachers helping to keep Christianity vibrant and alive by assigning problems which are later graded as right and wrong?&lt;br /&gt;
::C) How ever often you claim to read the bible doesn't really matter here. This is the internet, anyone can claim to read the bible. however much they want. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 20:32, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'd have to weigh in with [[User:AlaskanEconomy|AE]] on this. Although, specifically, &amp;quot;diversity&amp;quot; is ''becoming'' a by-word, diversity is an [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/diversity old word] and refers to more than ''just'' homosexualization, by keeping it as is '''gives''' those advocates legitimacy and (in the end) we end up losing a serviceable word. [[User:DevonJ|DevonJ]] 21:06, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Taxation&amp;diff=851546</id>
		<title>Taxation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Taxation&amp;diff=851546"/>
		<updated>2011-02-23T02:22:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: How could the list be missing Excise tax?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Taxation''' is how [[government]]s obtain [[money]] in order to provide services required for the common good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many kinds of taxes, just as there are many things that are (or are not) considered to be in the common good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taxes can include:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Payroll taxes]] are the state and federal taxes that employers must withhold and/or to pay on behalf of employees. Employers withhold state and federal income taxes as well as social security and Medicare taxes from the employees' wages. Employers are also required to pay a matching amount of social security and Medicare taxes for each employee and to pay state and federal unemployment tax&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tariff]]s on imported goods &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Property tax]]es on the value of one's [[real estate]] holdings&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sales tax]]es on purchases of goods&lt;br /&gt;
**(The preceding three are examples of ''[[ad valorem tax|ad valorem]]'' taxes), based as a percentage of value&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Income tax]]es on money that is earned&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Estate tax]]es on inheritances&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Poll tax]]es required in order to vote; they are voluntary&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rooms and meals tax]]es, charged by local government on restaurant and hotel purchases &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;[[Sin tax]]es&amp;quot; which are applied to socially disapproved products such as tobacco and alcohol&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pigovian tax]]es are applied to correct [[negative externalities]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Toll]]s are fees paid by users of a specific piece of [[infrastructure]], like a tollroad or toll bridge&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Value Added Tax|Value added tax]] is charged to manufacturers on the increase in value from raw materials to finished product (and of course passed along to consumers of the product); it is common in Europe and not used in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Excise tax]] is a special tax on the production or sale of some specific good or commodity. It is an inland tax, rather than a Tariff. The US federal government was run on excise taxes from various forms of alcohol until [[prohibition]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most systems of taxation not only use a combination of several of these, but have many exceptions (and loopholes) from universal application - for instance, a sales tax might not apply to food or clothing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rates of taxation and the provision of some services can be matters of great political contention, with [[Tax revolts]] common throughout world history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, the [[Democratic party]] generally favors higher income taxes to pay for government social programs, whereas the [[Republican Party]] generally favors smaller government and lower taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Government services]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Taxation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Secularized_Language&amp;diff=851528</id>
		<title>Talk:Secularized Language</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Secularized_Language&amp;diff=851528"/>
		<updated>2011-02-23T01:32:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* Perversion diversity */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'd like to organize these into categories - not divided up, maybe - with secularized expressions at the top (e.g., Thank God =&amp;gt; thank goodness). Terms indicating a total shift of concept like Bible Study =&amp;gt; fundamentalism might come later. Everyone okay with this? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:43, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Sounds good to me!  How about giving it a try and let's see how it looks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:32, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::To be fair, many more conservative Christians (my mother, for example), use some of the so-called &amp;quot;secular expressions&amp;quot; because they take a strict line on taking the Lord's name in vain. She would, for example, rather not say &amp;quot;Thank God&amp;quot; unless she was quite literally thanking the deity. Indeed, I believe that is how the &amp;quot;thank goodness&amp;quot; construction originally evolved. --[[User:Jdixon|Jdixon]] 12:57, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That might well be, Jdixon--certainly, it's laudable to take seriously the commandment not to take the Lord's name in vain--but I don't think very many Christians would see a heartfelt &amp;quot;Thank God!&amp;quot; as inappropriate in many circumstances.  Thus, while your mother's conscientiousness is admirable, I don't think such conscientiousness is a sufficient explanation for the systematic removal of religious language from the public square.  Certainly, I think that some people choose &amp;quot;Thank goodness&amp;quot; out of a concern for propriety, but I think many more choose it out of a desire to avoid giving offense, or simply because it's what they're most used to hearing.  Perhaps a section on differing reasons for using these terms could be included in the article; after all, this is supposed to be an examination of the issue.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 13:34, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Washington's Birthday/President's Day ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While this is a case of P.C., it's not a case of secularized language. Last I checked, George Washington was not a sacred personage. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 13:47, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Washington was a prominent Christian whose habit of praying and appealing to God for assistance is well-known.  He was a kind of saint, and the downplaying of his (indisputable) significance is due to his Christianity.  If he had been an atheist then you'd see the opposite effect.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:20, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What kind of a saint was George Washington? --[[User:JohannesZ|JohannesZ]] 15:52, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The kind that wins wars.  There have been other examples.  Have you ever heard of [[Joan of Arc]]?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:02, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Canonized in 1920, right? When did the Church recognize Washington as a saint? [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:17, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::@Andy: Aye. She still needed miracles credited to her. [http://www.stjoan-center.com/novelapp/joaap04.html] --[[User:JohannesZ|JohannesZ]] 16:20, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I don't think all Christian churches have the same rules.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:23, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Undoubtedly. So which churches DO recognize Washington as a saint or other type of sacred being? [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:26, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Perhaps the church of Satan does, or perhaps atheists simply dislike Washington.  Wouldn't that be enough to explain the misnaming of the holiday as described in the entry?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:31, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm pretty sure that The Church of Satan does not acknowledge George Washington as divine. If there's any evidence -- a tract from an angry atheist decrying a celebration of the Christian Washington and demanding a holiday that accommodates the Presidents that were not Christians, I've yet to find one. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:37, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Marty, bias doesn't work that way.  You're not likely to find such an angry tract about ''any'' of the items on the list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Atheistic bias, like other forms of bias, seeks to downplay and minimize Christianity.  Washington was a leading, accomplished Christian.  Lincoln far less so, other presidents even lesser still, and the office of president not Christian at all.  An atheistic bias pushes language from the Christian recognition to the more atheistic substitute.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:15, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I agree with Andy here; the greater the Christianity of an historical figure, the more the atheistic revisionists will try to downplay his significance.  [[User:PeterUker|PeterUker]] 18:24, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A few questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few of the words here don't really seem to fit in the list.&lt;br /&gt;
For example:&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Resurrection Sunday''' -&amp;gt; '''Easter'''&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Easter&amp;quot; does have pagan origins, but the Pope says &amp;quot;Easter Sunday&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;Resurrection Sunday&amp;quot; - see[http://www.vatican.va/liturgical_year/liturgico_en/easter.html] and [http://www.vatican.va/news_services/liturgy/calendar/ns_liturgy_calendar_en.html#APRIL_2011]. In fact, a Google search of the Vatican website doesn't find &amp;quot;Resurrection Sunday&amp;quot; at all, except a few times with commas in between.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Washington's Birthday''' -&amp;gt; '''President's Day'''&lt;br /&gt;
::It's not secularization as far as I can tell. And President's Day honors Lincoln as well. Silly political correctness, maybe. Secularization, no.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pagan''' -&amp;gt; '''Secular'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Pagan usually refers to belief in multiple gods, while secular refers to something separate from religion (e.g. the Turkish government is secular because there is no state religion).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''God bless you''' -&amp;gt; '''Gesundheit'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Gesundheit is what Germans have always said after a sneeze. Many European countries have the same kind of response. Nobody ever says &amp;quot;God bless you&amp;quot; in German. &amp;quot;Gesundheit&amp;quot; is as old as &amp;quot;God bless you&amp;quot;, and the people who say it got the idea from German-Americans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:DouglasL|DouglasL]] 14:18, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pagan definition: one who has little or no religion. Secular definition: not overtly or specifically religious. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:31, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Saint's Days ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Valentine's Day is no longer officially the feast day for St. Valentine, which definitely explains on some level why the &amp;quot;St&amp;quot; has been dropped from the name. February 14th is now the feast day for Cyril and Methodius, this changed in 1969 under Pope Paul the V, I think. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Paddy for St. Patrick's Day makes logical sense in that Paddy is a celtic diminutive for Padrig, which is Anglicized to Patrick. I've never actually heard it as Paddy's Day, I've always heard it as &amp;quot;St. Paddy's Day&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Resurrection Sunday has been called Easter since at the very least the AD 600s. St. Bede's ''Ecclesiastical History of the English People'' written in the early 700s refers to it as Easter, although he does admit it is tied to the Pagan festival of Eostre he still uses the term Easter. I don't think it is logical to use Easter as an example of modern society trying to erase Christian influence from daily life, I think it is simply a continuation of a name that is well over 1,000 years old. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
just my thoughts, good luck.--[[User:IScott|IScott]] 19:13, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Perversion diversity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I understand it this is a list of words that are backward compatible to former religious meanings. We could stop saying Happy Holidays as a society and say Merry Christmas. I'd hate to think of what bigots we would appear to be if we started calling diversity perversion. &amp;quot;Have a lot of people off all different races, creeds, and colors working at your company, you are perverted!&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;A black man marrying a white woman, that's a perverted couple!&amp;quot; Since I doubt that anyone here thinks that way (and if they do maybe they should find somewhere else to be) then I think that should be pulled from the list for now. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 20:01, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'Diversity' is a word used often by liberals and others who push the [[homosexual agenda]], claiming that ongoing [[homosexualization]] is in the name of diversity.  As a conservative and one who reads the Bible daily, I find same-sex marriage perverse, yet liberals such as yourself would refer to such things as diverse.  Hence, your non-sequiturs aside, I feel the entry should remain.  [[User:PeterUker|PeterUker]] 20:10, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::A) You didn't address my point&lt;br /&gt;
::B) Perversion isn't a religious word any more than right and wrong. Are math teachers helping to keep Christianity vibrant and alive by assigning problems which are later graded as right and wrong?&lt;br /&gt;
::C) How ever often you claim to read the bible doesn't really matter here. This is the internet, anyone can claim to read the bible. however much they want. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 20:32, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Invisible_hand&amp;diff=851524</id>
		<title>Invisible hand</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Invisible_hand&amp;diff=851524"/>
		<updated>2011-02-23T01:26:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: I haven't ever read anything about this, but I believe that original research can be added&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''invisible hand''' is [[Adam Smith]]'s name for the [[economic]] trend towards productivity and efficiency that results when [[government]] stops interfering in markets trying to steer them and allows individuals and corporations to fend for themselves and reap the benefits of their own hard work and innovation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Smith's promotion and popularization of the concept in his 1776 book [[The Wealth of Nations]], and it propelled the [[British Empire]] to become the greatest power in the history of the world in the 19th century. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He theorized that the self-interest of individuals acting independently will lead to a socially optimal outcome:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.econlib.org/LIBRARY/Smith/smWN13.html ''Wealth of Nations'', Book IV, Chapter 2]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;[B]y directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an ''invisible hand'' to promote an end which was no part of his intention. Nor is it always the worse for the society that it was not part of it. ''By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it.'' I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good.&amp;quot; (Emphasis added)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, [[game theory]] suggests that this is not always true; in circumstances where individuals are not allowed private property rights each individual acting in their own self-interest does not result in the socially optimal outcome. One such example is the [[problem of the commons|tragedy of the commons]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The invisible hand in nature ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The invisible hand is seen outside of an economic context in nature. There is no [[EPA]] appointed [[czar]] who insists that [[fish]] only be found in rivers lakes and ponds, and no bureaucrat that dictates that the kingfishers only be found where fish live. A complete ecosystem can assemble from [[Great Flood|wreckage]] and have the illusion of having been assembled together with out having ever experienced disaster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Invisible Hand of Marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[ Best of the Public ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Secularized_Language&amp;diff=851514</id>
		<title>Secularized Language</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Secularized_Language&amp;diff=851514"/>
		<updated>2011-02-23T01:02:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: clipped as per talk page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Those with an [[antichristian]] agenda, such as [[liberal]]s, [[homosexual]]s, [[atheist]]s, [[evolutionist]]s and [[leftist]]s have attempted to remove the [[Christian]] origins of our '''[[language]]''' by replacing common phrases with '''[[secular]]ized''' versions.  By appealing to [[tolerance]] and [[political correctness]], they have succeeded in propagating these secularized versions, even among those who don't share their views.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Original expression&lt;br /&gt;
!Secularized version&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Thank God!&lt;br /&gt;
|Thank Goodness!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God bless you&lt;br /&gt;
|Gesundheit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Praise the Lord&lt;br /&gt;
|Praise be&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Thank heavens&lt;br /&gt;
|Thank goodness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Merry Christmas&lt;br /&gt;
|Happy Holidays&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Christmas Holiday&lt;br /&gt;
|Winter Break&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easter Holiday&lt;br /&gt;
|Spring Break&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|B.C./A.D.&lt;br /&gt;
|B.C.E./C.E.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Saint Valentine's Day&lt;br /&gt;
|Valentine's Day&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Resurrection Sunday&lt;br /&gt;
|Easter&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Hell]] (or Heaven)&lt;br /&gt;
|Afterlife&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sin&lt;br /&gt;
|Crime&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sin&lt;br /&gt;
|Lifestyle Choice&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Abomination&lt;br /&gt;
|Mistake&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Holy Day&lt;br /&gt;
|Holiday&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Mother/Father&lt;br /&gt;
|Parent&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Son/Daughter&lt;br /&gt;
|Offspring&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|With child&lt;br /&gt;
|Pregnant&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bible study&lt;br /&gt;
|Fundamentalism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Blasphemy &lt;br /&gt;
|Secular opinion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Miraculous&lt;br /&gt;
|Amazing&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Heresy&lt;br /&gt;
|Scientific theory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Abortion&lt;br /&gt;
|Birth control&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-abortion&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-choice&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-life&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-choice&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Immoral&lt;br /&gt;
|Personal choice&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Husband or wife&lt;br /&gt;
|Significant other/life partner&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|prayer/blessing&lt;br /&gt;
|moment of silence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Washington's Birthday&lt;br /&gt;
|President's Day&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Holy matrimony&lt;br /&gt;
|Civil union&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Providence&lt;br /&gt;
|Lucky break&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pagan&lt;br /&gt;
|Secular&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hallowed Eve&lt;br /&gt;
|Halloween&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Shrove Tuesday&lt;br /&gt;
|Fat Tuesday&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Thanksgiving&lt;br /&gt;
|Turkey Day&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|The Reverend Martin Luther King Day&lt;br /&gt;
|MLK Day&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Saint Patrick's Day&lt;br /&gt;
|Paddy's Day&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Unborn baby&lt;br /&gt;
|Fetus&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Creation&lt;br /&gt;
|Abiogenesis&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Covetousness&lt;br /&gt;
|Inequality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Contraception&lt;br /&gt;
|Protection&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Actress&lt;br /&gt;
|Actor&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Curse&lt;br /&gt;
|Bad luck&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rebuke&lt;br /&gt;
|Hate speech&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|The State&lt;br /&gt;
|The Government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God&lt;br /&gt;
|A higher power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Harlot&lt;br /&gt;
|Sex worker&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Marriage certificate&lt;br /&gt;
|Just a piece of paper&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Religion&lt;br /&gt;
|Spirituality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Fertile&lt;br /&gt;
|Breeder&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Adultery&lt;br /&gt;
|Cheating&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gave up the ghost&lt;br /&gt;
|Died&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Act of God&lt;br /&gt;
|Natural disaster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Living in sin&lt;br /&gt;
|Shacking up&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Politically correct]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal creep]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Contrast with [[Essay:Best New Conservative Words]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Language]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Secularized_Language&amp;diff=851513</id>
		<title>Talk:Secularized Language</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Secularized_Language&amp;diff=851513"/>
		<updated>2011-02-23T01:01:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* Perversion diversity */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'd like to organize these into categories - not divided up, maybe - with secularized expressions at the top (e.g., Thank God =&amp;gt; thank goodness). Terms indicating a total shift of concept like Bible Study =&amp;gt; fundamentalism might come later. Everyone okay with this? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:43, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Sounds good to me!  How about giving it a try and let's see how it looks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:32, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::To be fair, many more conservative Christians (my mother, for example), use some of the so-called &amp;quot;secular expressions&amp;quot; because they take a strict line on taking the Lord's name in vain. She would, for example, rather not say &amp;quot;Thank God&amp;quot; unless she was quite literally thanking the deity. Indeed, I believe that is how the &amp;quot;thank goodness&amp;quot; construction originally evolved. --[[User:Jdixon|Jdixon]] 12:57, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That might well be, Jdixon--certainly, it's laudable to take seriously the commandment not to take the Lord's name in vain--but I don't think very many Christians would see a heartfelt &amp;quot;Thank God!&amp;quot; as inappropriate in many circumstances.  Thus, while your mother's conscientiousness is admirable, I don't think such conscientiousness is a sufficient explanation for the systematic removal of religious language from the public square.  Certainly, I think that some people choose &amp;quot;Thank goodness&amp;quot; out of a concern for propriety, but I think many more choose it out of a desire to avoid giving offense, or simply because it's what they're most used to hearing.  Perhaps a section on differing reasons for using these terms could be included in the article; after all, this is supposed to be an examination of the issue.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 13:34, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Washington's Birthday/President's Day ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While this is a case of P.C., it's not a case of secularized language. Last I checked, George Washington was not a sacred personage. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 13:47, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Washington was a prominent Christian whose habit of praying and appealing to God for assistance is well-known.  He was a kind of saint, and the downplaying of his (indisputable) significance is due to his Christianity.  If he had been an atheist then you'd see the opposite effect.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:20, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What kind of a saint was George Washington? --[[User:JohannesZ|JohannesZ]] 15:52, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The kind that wins wars.  There have been other examples.  Have you ever heard of [[Joan of Arc]]?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:02, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Canonized in 1920, right? When did the Church recognize Washington as a saint? [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:17, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::@Andy: Aye. She still needed miracles credited to her. [http://www.stjoan-center.com/novelapp/joaap04.html] --[[User:JohannesZ|JohannesZ]] 16:20, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I don't think all Christian churches have the same rules.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:23, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Undoubtedly. So which churches DO recognize Washington as a saint or other type of sacred being? [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:26, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Perhaps the church of Satan does, or perhaps atheists simply dislike Washington.  Wouldn't that be enough to explain the misnaming of the holiday as described in the entry?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:31, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm pretty sure that The Church of Satan does not acknowledge George Washington as divine. If there's any evidence -- a tract from an angry atheist decrying a celebration of the Christian Washington and demanding a holiday that accommodates the Presidents that were not Christians, I've yet to find one. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 16:37, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Marty, bias doesn't work that way.  You're not likely to find such an angry tract about ''any'' of the items on the list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Atheistic bias, like other forms of bias, seeks to downplay and minimize Christianity.  Washington was a leading, accomplished Christian.  Lincoln far less so, other presidents even lesser still, and the office of president not Christian at all.  An atheistic bias pushes language from the Christian recognition to the more atheistic substitute.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:15, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I agree with Andy here; the greater the Christianity of an historical figure, the more the atheistic revisionists will try to downplay his significance.  [[User:PeterUker|PeterUker]] 18:24, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A few questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few of the words here don't really seem to fit in the list.&lt;br /&gt;
For example:&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Resurrection Sunday''' -&amp;gt; '''Easter'''&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Easter&amp;quot; does have pagan origins, but the Pope says &amp;quot;Easter Sunday&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;Resurrection Sunday&amp;quot; - see[http://www.vatican.va/liturgical_year/liturgico_en/easter.html] and [http://www.vatican.va/news_services/liturgy/calendar/ns_liturgy_calendar_en.html#APRIL_2011]. In fact, a Google search of the Vatican website doesn't find &amp;quot;Resurrection Sunday&amp;quot; at all, except a few times with commas in between.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Washington's Birthday''' -&amp;gt; '''President's Day'''&lt;br /&gt;
::It's not secularization as far as I can tell. And President's Day honors Lincoln as well. Silly political correctness, maybe. Secularization, no.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pagan''' -&amp;gt; '''Secular'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Pagan usually refers to belief in multiple gods, while secular refers to something separate from religion (e.g. the Turkish government is secular because there is no state religion).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''God bless you''' -&amp;gt; '''Gesundheit'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Gesundheit is what Germans have always said after a sneeze. Many European countries have the same kind of response. Nobody ever says &amp;quot;God bless you&amp;quot; in German. &amp;quot;Gesundheit&amp;quot; is as old as &amp;quot;God bless you&amp;quot;, and the people who say it got the idea from German-Americans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:DouglasL|DouglasL]] 14:18, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pagan definition: one who has little or no religion. Secular definition: not overtly or specifically religious. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:31, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Saint's Days ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Valentine's Day is no longer officially the feast day for St. Valentine, which definitely explains on some level why the &amp;quot;St&amp;quot; has been dropped from the name. February 14th is now the feast day for Cyril and Methodius, this changed in 1969 under Pope Paul the V, I think. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Paddy for St. Patrick's Day makes logical sense in that Paddy is a celtic diminutive for Padrig, which is Anglicized to Patrick. I've never actually heard it as Paddy's Day, I've always heard it as &amp;quot;St. Paddy's Day&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Resurrection Sunday has been called Easter since at the very least the AD 600s. St. Bede's ''Ecclesiastical History of the English People'' written in the early 700s refers to it as Easter, although he does admit it is tied to the Pagan festival of Eostre he still uses the term Easter. I don't think it is logical to use Easter as an example of modern society trying to erase Christian influence from daily life, I think it is simply a continuation of a name that is well over 1,000 years old. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
just my thoughts, good luck.--[[User:IScott|IScott]] 19:13, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Perversion diversity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I understand it this is a list of words that are backward compatible to former religious meanings. We could stop saying Happy Holidays as a society and say Merry Christmas. I'd hate to think of what bigots we would appear to be if we started calling diversity perversion. &amp;quot;Have a lot of people off all different races, creeds, and colors working at your company, you are perverted!&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;A black man marrying a white woman, that's a perverted couple!&amp;quot; Since I doubt that anyone here thinks that way (and if they do maybe they should find somewhere else to be) then I think that should be pulled from the list for now. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 20:01, 22 February 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:communicating_effectively&amp;diff=849834</id>
		<title>Essay:communicating effectively</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:communicating_effectively&amp;diff=849834"/>
		<updated>2011-02-17T02:55:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Essay By|[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Effective communication''' is a deliberative act. This is a learned skill rather than an innate talent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to foster better communication I've decided to highlight 6 key components:&lt;br /&gt;
1)Don't be intellectually lazy&lt;br /&gt;
2)Show don't tell&lt;br /&gt;
3)Be deliberate in your delivery&lt;br /&gt;
4)Choose the medium which best communicates your message&lt;br /&gt;
5)Tailor your argument for your audience&lt;br /&gt;
6)Listen to feedback&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Don't be intellectually lazy==&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to communicate something you are taking a burden on to your self, there is a reason orators have been well paid for the last 3000 years. The fact that you have something true and important to say is not enough to get you an audience. If you want to be able to communicate you have to know your own argument forwards and backwards from top to bottom left to right inside and out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An example of people who did not take this step are the hippies, when communicating peace. Peace is largely a good thing, it leads to economic prosperity (assuming you do not accept [[Keynesian economics]]) and is a state of being that is good for freedoms and personal liberties. In spite of this the hippies never bothered to examine how peace came to be, how peace end, or what situations are best to prolong peace. They attacked programs like [[Mutually assured destruction]] and thrashed about creating a lot of noise but utterly unable to communicate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any time you are dealing with any controversial subject you can expect your opponents to have their own deeply entrenched ideas. If you want to disabuse them of these notions you have to present a complete argument against them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally it is a rude surprise to find out that you do not believe your own ideas for the reasons you think you, and can lead to a personal crisis. If you don't know something maybe you aren't the best person to be communicating it. If you decide to communicate when you haven't got a complete picture it's very important that you remain ever cognizant of the limitations of your own scope of knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Show don't tell==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the last section we discussed building a complete argument, now it's time to put your argument on display. Those who do not accept your conclusions will be more than comfortable simply writing you off as being wrong and not listening to you. It is justifiable to tell them where you are going with your argument before you start, but then you should lay down your foundation of commonly agreed upon facts and show each step of the way that you derive the conclusion that you intend to communicate. This is where it really pays off to have worked your way through your own ideas several times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is only so much credibility that other people are willing to give your ideas, lets call that interpersonal capital, if you tell people your conclusions you can buy their assent with interpersonal capital, or you can use a smaller amount of interpersonal capital to lay the foundations of an argument and follow those up with free logic and build a valuable argument.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not only is it more convincing to show your work, so to speak, but also it's more useful if you want this information to carry on beyond your immediate audience. When you show your work you've instantly given everyone listening a shortcut when they go to do step one themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A wonderful example of the importance of this is explaining the [[invisible hand]]. The concept is elegant and beautiful and key to a conservative understanding of the advantages of capitalism, but telling people that the invisible hand of the market serves to balance supply and demand does nothing to increase peoples understanding of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Be deliberate in your delivery==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No one likes a ninny. If you want people to accept and believe you you have to show that you yourself accept and believe you. To this end you should do your best to avoid [[weasel words]], though occasionally you have to include qualifiers to avoid being wrong. It might be tempting to construct an argument completely out of quotations but you cannot build an idea inside of someone else's head with out standing behind it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Choose the medium which best communicates your message==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are trying to tell a narrative a movie is an excellent way to do it, but if you are trying to prove a point of contention a movie is incapable of effectively tying into references in the way an academic style paper can. Pictures and figures can greatly increase our ability to communicate information and can add much needed visual interest to an otherwise bland presentation or document but it is easy to misuse them and great care should be used to both select the pictures that most effectively communicate what you intend as well as tying them into the body of the presentation or text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures should never be added for pictures sake, people resent being mislead with irrelevant information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tailor your argument for your audience==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are arguing a historical or legal point your argument should be built primarily of quotations and analysis of those quotations. If you are trying to argue a mathematical point a formal proof is what is called for. If you are making a point in economics you should rely heavily on logic and mathematics and data. If you are arguing a scientific concept you should be relying on scientific literature. If you are communicating your personal state then emotions should form the backbone of your argument.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to construct your arguments in a format that is appropriate to the forum. Just like you need a complete argument you cannot expect to be able to communicate that complete argument in the wrong format. You wouldn't expect something said in the wrong language to take so you shouldn't expect the wrong format to win you any fans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An additional consideration is that you have to take into account what those who are listening to you are likely to accept already. If you are arguing a point about economics to economists you can skip the explanation of supply and demand curves but if you are trying to communicate the same thing to a group of sociologists this must be included. Keep in mind that these are additional things you have to show people, you cannot just tell some extra things ''at'' them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Listen to feedback==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most infuriating traits about [[liberal]]s is that they are sure that they know what's best for people. At the same time people will help you to change their minds if you take the time to listen. People will point out what they disagree with about your argument and this gives you a second chance to straighten them out on the point. not only do you get a second shot at changing their mind but you also get a chance to refine your own argument. You can strip away the weaker points and get to the heart of the matter, not wasting time on unconvincing arguments.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:communicating_effectively&amp;diff=849833</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay:communicating effectively</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:communicating_effectively&amp;diff=849833"/>
		<updated>2011-02-17T02:52:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: Created page with &amp;quot;I noticed some less than convincing arguments being used, I hope to build this into a complete run through of how to communicate effectively which may eventually be incorporated ...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I noticed some less than convincing arguments being used, I hope to build this into a complete run through of how to communicate effectively which may eventually be incorporated into the conservapedia manual of style. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 21:52, 16 February 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:communicating_effectively&amp;diff=849832</id>
		<title>Essay:communicating effectively</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:communicating_effectively&amp;diff=849832"/>
		<updated>2011-02-17T02:50:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: I'll finish this later, maybe even come up with more components to add to the list. Eventually I expect each section to be about 1,500 words.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Effective communication''' is a deliberative act. This is a learned skill rather than an innate talent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to foster better communication I've decided to highlight 6 key components:&lt;br /&gt;
1)Don't be intellectually lazy&lt;br /&gt;
2)Show don't tell&lt;br /&gt;
3)Be deliberate in your delivery&lt;br /&gt;
4)Choose the medium which best communicates your message&lt;br /&gt;
5)Tailor your argument for your audience&lt;br /&gt;
6)Listen to feedback&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Don't be intellectually lazy==&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to communicate something you are taking a burden on to your self, there is a reason orators have been well paid for the last 3000 years. The fact that you have something true and important to say is not enough to get you an audience. If you want to be able to communicate you have to know your own argument forwards and backwards from top to bottom left to right inside and out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An example of people who did not take this step are the hippies, when communicating peace. Peace is largely a good thing, it leads to economic prosperity (assuming you do not accept [[Keynesian economics]]) and is a state of being that is good for freedoms and personal liberties. In spite of this the hippies never bothered to examine how peace came to be, how peace end, or what situations are best to prolong peace. They attacked programs like [[Mutually assured destruction]] and thrashed about creating a lot of noise but utterly unable to communicate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any time you are dealing with any controversial subject you can expect your opponents to have their own deeply entrenched ideas. If you want to disabuse them of these notions you have to present a complete argument against them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally it is a rude surprise to find out that you do not believe your own ideas for the reasons you think you, and can lead to a personal crisis. If you don't know something maybe you aren't the best person to be communicating it. If you decide to communicate when you haven't got a complete picture it's very important that you remain ever cognizant of the limitations of your own scope of knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Show don't tell==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the last section we discussed building a complete argument, now it's time to put your argument on display. Those who do not accept your conclusions will be more than comfortable simply writing you off as being wrong and not listening to you. It is justifiable to tell them where you are going with your argument before you start, but then you should lay down your foundation of commonly agreed upon facts and show each step of the way that you derive the conclusion that you intend to communicate. This is where it really pays off to have worked your way through your own ideas several times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is only so much credibility that other people are willing to give your ideas, lets call that interpersonal capital, if you tell people your conclusions you can buy their assent with interpersonal capital, or you can use a smaller amount of interpersonal capital to lay the foundations of an argument and follow those up with free logic and build a valuable argument.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not only is it more convincing to show your work, so to speak, but also it's more useful if you want this information to carry on beyond your immediate audience. When you show your work you've instantly given everyone listening a shortcut when they go to do step one themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A wonderful example of the importance of this is explaining the [[invisible hand]]. The concept is elegant and beautiful and key to a conservative understanding of the advantages of capitalism, but telling people that the invisible hand of the market serves to balance supply and demand does nothing to increase peoples understanding of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Be deliberate in your delivery==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No one likes a ninny. If you want people to accept and believe you you have to show that you yourself accept and believe you. To this end you should do your best to avoid [[weasel words]], though occasionally you have to include qualifiers to avoid being wrong. It might be tempting to construct an argument completely out of quotations but you cannot build an idea inside of someone else's head with out standing behind it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Choose the medium which best communicates your message==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are trying to tell a narrative a movie is an excellent way to do it, but if you are trying to prove a point of contention a movie is incapable of effectively tying into references in the way an academic style paper can. Pictures and figures can greatly increase our ability to communicate information and can add much needed visual interest to an otherwise bland presentation or document but it is easy to misuse them and great care should be used to both select the pictures that most effectively communicate what you intend as well as tying them into the body of the presentation or text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures should never be added for pictures sake, people resent being mislead with irrelevant information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tailor your argument for your audience==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are arguing a historical or legal point your argument should be built primarily of quotations and analysis of those quotations. If you are trying to argue a mathematical point a formal proof is what is called for. If you are making a point in economics you should rely heavily on logic and mathematics and data. If you are arguing a scientific concept you should be relying on scientific literature. If you are communicating your personal state then emotions should form the backbone of your argument.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to construct your arguments in a format that is appropriate to the forum. Just like you need a complete argument you cannot expect to be able to communicate that complete argument in the wrong format. You wouldn't expect something said in the wrong language to take so you shouldn't expect the wrong format to win you any fans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An additional consideration is that you have to take into account what those who are listening to you are likely to accept already. If you are arguing a point about economics to economists you can skip the explanation of supply and demand curves but if you are trying to communicate the same thing to a group of sociologists this must be included. Keep in mind that these are additional things you have to show people, you cannot just tell some extra things ''at'' them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Listen to feedback==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most infuriating traits about [[liberal]]s is that they are sure that they know what's best for people. At the same time people will help you to change their minds if you take the time to listen. People will point out what they disagree with about your argument and this gives you a second chance to straighten them out on the point. not only do you get a second shot at changing their mind but you also get a chance to refine your own argument. You can strip away the weaker points and get to the heart of the matter, not wasting time on unconvincing arguments.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Rick_Scott&amp;diff=849822</id>
		<title>Talk:Rick Scott</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Rick_Scott&amp;diff=849822"/>
		<updated>2011-02-17T02:04:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: Created page with &amp;quot;I'm listening to the podcast of wait wait don't tell me (from 2-5-2011) right now, and they are saying that Rick Scott's career before replacing Jeb Bush was running a health car...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm listening to the podcast of wait wait don't tell me (from 2-5-2011) right now, and they are saying that Rick Scott's career before replacing Jeb Bush was running a health care company that defrauded the government of a billion dollars. I don't necessarily care enough to do a proper job of researching politics happening on the other side of the continent, but I'd sure love to see a responsible assessment of these claims. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 21:04, 16 February 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sedge&amp;diff=849800</id>
		<title>Sedge</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sedge&amp;diff=849800"/>
		<updated>2011-02-17T01:09:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: Created page with &amp;quot;'''Sedges''' are a taxonomic family of plants which superficially resemble grasses or reeds. Segdes grow in nearly every terrestrial environment and are particularly dominant in ...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Sedges''' are a taxonomic family of plants which superficially resemble grasses or reeds. Segdes grow in nearly every terrestrial environment and are particularly dominant in wet soils, poor soils, and far northern climates such as the [[tundra]] of [[Alaska]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=CAREX&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dall_Sheep&amp;diff=849798</id>
		<title>Dall Sheep</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dall_Sheep&amp;diff=849798"/>
		<updated>2011-02-17T01:03:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: Created page with &amp;quot;'''Dall Sheep''' or '''Dall's Sheep''' are the northern most wild sheep in the world, found in Alaska and Canada. Slightly smaller than other wild sheep they have a w...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Dall Sheep''' or '''Dall's Sheep''' are the northern most wild [[sheep]] in the world, found in [[Alaska]] and [[Canada]]. Slightly smaller than other wild sheep they have a white coat and distinct curved amber gray horns. Dalls Sheep are important to the economy of Alaska because of their popularity both with trophy hunters and wild life photographers. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wildlife.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=funfacts.sheep&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sheep&amp;diff=849796</id>
		<title>Sheep</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sheep&amp;diff=849796"/>
		<updated>2011-02-17T00:54:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* Wild Sheep */ Alaska!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Taxonomy|image = Sheep.jpg|kingdom = Animalia|phylum = Chordata|subphylum = Vertebrata|class = Mammalia|order = Artiodactyla|suborder = Ruminantia |family = Bovidae|subfamily = Caprinae|genus = Ovis|species = O. aries (Domestic sheep)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. canadensis (Bighorn sheep)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. dalli (Dall Sheep)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. musimon or&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. ammon musimon (European Mouflon)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. nivicola (Snow sheep)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. orientalis (Asiatic Mouflon)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. vignei (Urial)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. ammon (Argali) }}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sheep''' are woolly herbivorous [[ungulate]]s, that are farmed in many places for their [[wool]], their fleeces, their [[mutton|meat]] and sometimes their milk. Male sheep are called rams or tups - unless castrated in which case they are called wethers.  Female sheep are ewes.  Juvenile sheep are lambs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While traditionally thought to be of limited intelligence there are wild (as yet unproven) stories of sheep being able to navigating obstacles designed to hinder their movements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sheep farming is particularly important in [[New Zealand]], [[Australia]] and many parts of the [[United Kingdom]], especially [[Wales]] and the wild borderlands of [[Scotland]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wild Sheep ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wild varieties of sheep are found in many mountainous regions worldwide. Varieties include the [[bighorn sheep]] and [[Dall Sheep]] of North America, the [[mouflon]] of Sardinia and Corsica, the Marco polo sheep of Afghanistan, and the [[aoudad]] of North Africa. Herds of feral sheep are also known, such as the Soay sheep of certain [[Scotland|Scottish]] islands, believed to have lived wild since the [[Bronze Age]]. Herdwick sheep are unique to the English lake District, Cumbria.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sheep in the Bible ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sheep are mentioned many times in the [[Bible]], and [[Christians]] are frequently likened to sheep of whom [[God]] is the shepherd, most notably in [[Psalm]] 23:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(KJV)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As well as in [[Revelation]] 5:12 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In a loud voice they sang: &amp;quot;Worthy is the Lamb, who was slain, to receive power and wealth and wisdom and strength and honor and glory and praise!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;[http://www.igreetyou.com/ShepherdLamb1.html]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jesus]] is sometimes likened to a lamb, as lambs were often used for sacrifices&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A ram stuck in a thicket was a substitute sacrifice for [[Isaac]] in [[Genesis]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Old and New Worlds==&lt;br /&gt;
[[American]] cuisine is noted for the absence of lamb and mutton dishes, and sheep are not widely farmed, perhaps because the idea of a sheep ranch might be perceived as undermining the national 'frontier' self image.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sheep in popular culture==&lt;br /&gt;
Sheep are often used as a metaphor for unthinking followers of any particular ideology. [[George Orwell]] used them in this way in his novel ''[[Animal Farm]]'' when the sheep could be counted on to back up the animal revolution led by the pigs by baaa-ing ''Four legs good, two legs bad'' when required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ruminants]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Domestic Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Livestock]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biblical Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kosher Animals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sheep&amp;diff=849794</id>
		<title>Sheep</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sheep&amp;diff=849794"/>
		<updated>2011-02-17T00:53:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* Wild Sheep */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Taxonomy|image = Sheep.jpg|kingdom = Animalia|phylum = Chordata|subphylum = Vertebrata|class = Mammalia|order = Artiodactyla|suborder = Ruminantia |family = Bovidae|subfamily = Caprinae|genus = Ovis|species = O. aries (Domestic sheep)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. canadensis (Bighorn sheep)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. dalli (Dall Sheep)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. musimon or&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. ammon musimon (European Mouflon)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. nivicola (Snow sheep)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. orientalis (Asiatic Mouflon)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. vignei (Urial)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O. ammon (Argali) }}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sheep''' are woolly herbivorous [[ungulate]]s, that are farmed in many places for their [[wool]], their fleeces, their [[mutton|meat]] and sometimes their milk. Male sheep are called rams or tups - unless castrated in which case they are called wethers.  Female sheep are ewes.  Juvenile sheep are lambs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While traditionally thought to be of limited intelligence there are wild (as yet unproven) stories of sheep being able to navigating obstacles designed to hinder their movements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sheep farming is particularly important in [[New Zealand]], [[Australia]] and many parts of the [[United Kingdom]], especially [[Wales]] and the wild borderlands of [[Scotland]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wild Sheep ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wild varieties of sheep are found in many mountainous regions worldwide. Varieties include the [[bighorn sheep]] of North America, the [[mouflon]] of Sardinia and Corsica, the Marco polo sheep of Afghanistan, and the [[aoudad]] of North Africa. Herds of feral sheep are also known, such as the Soay sheep of certain [[Scotland|Scottish]] islands, believed to have lived wild since the [[Bronze Age]]. Herdwick sheep are unique to the English lake District, Cumbria.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sheep in the Bible ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sheep are mentioned many times in the [[Bible]], and [[Christians]] are frequently likened to sheep of whom [[God]] is the shepherd, most notably in [[Psalm]] 23:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(KJV)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As well as in [[Revelation]] 5:12 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In a loud voice they sang: &amp;quot;Worthy is the Lamb, who was slain, to receive power and wealth and wisdom and strength and honor and glory and praise!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;[http://www.igreetyou.com/ShepherdLamb1.html]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jesus]] is sometimes likened to a lamb, as lambs were often used for sacrifices&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A ram stuck in a thicket was a substitute sacrifice for [[Isaac]] in [[Genesis]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Old and New Worlds==&lt;br /&gt;
[[American]] cuisine is noted for the absence of lamb and mutton dishes, and sheep are not widely farmed, perhaps because the idea of a sheep ranch might be perceived as undermining the national 'frontier' self image.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sheep in popular culture==&lt;br /&gt;
Sheep are often used as a metaphor for unthinking followers of any particular ideology. [[George Orwell]] used them in this way in his novel ''[[Animal Farm]]'' when the sheep could be counted on to back up the animal revolution led by the pigs by baaa-ing ''Four legs good, two legs bad'' when required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ruminants]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Domestic Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Livestock]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biblical Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kosher Animals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Musk_ox&amp;diff=849791</id>
		<title>Musk ox</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Musk_ox&amp;diff=849791"/>
		<updated>2011-02-17T00:52:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''muskox''' (''Ovibos moschatus'') is a large land [[mammal]] of the [[Arctic]], especially [[Siberia]], [[Alaska]] and northern [[Canada]]. It superficially resembles a small [[bull]] or [[ox]], but is more closely related to the [[goat]]. The Muskox subsists on a diet primarily made up of lichens and [[sedge]]s, which grow low to the ground in its [[tundra]] environment. The is covered in shaggy brown hair, with an undercoat of qiviut, a light weight and very insulative fiber.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.muskoxfarm.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The insulation provided by this layer prevents the muskox from running a great deal because they overheat. The musk ox can be grown as far south as Oregon but must be protected from predators to avoid heatstroke. The muskox uses its hooves and horns to scrape away the snow that covers its food in the winter. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/mammals/musk-ox.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ruminants]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Musk_ox&amp;diff=849790</id>
		<title>Musk ox</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Musk_ox&amp;diff=849790"/>
		<updated>2011-02-17T00:51:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: more info&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''muskox''' (''Ovibos moschatus'') is a large land [[mammal]] of the [[Arctic]], especially [[Siberia]], [[Alaska]] and northern [[Canada]]. It superficially resembles a small [[bull]] or [[ox]], but is more closely related to the [[goat]]. The Muskox subsists on a diet primarily made up of lichens and [[sedge]]s, which grow low to the ground in its [[tundra]] environment. The is covered in shaggy brown hair, with an undercoat of qiviut, a light weight and very insulative fiber.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.muskoxfarm.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The insulation provided by this layer prevents the muskox from running a great deal because they overheat. The musk ox can be grown as far south as Oregon but must be protected from predators to avoid heatstroke. The muskox uses its hooves and horns to scrape away the snow that covers its food in the winter. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/mammals/musk-ox.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ruminants]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;reference/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Taiga&amp;diff=849779</id>
		<title>Taiga</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Taiga&amp;diff=849779"/>
		<updated>2011-02-16T23:59:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: ref&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Taiga is a [[forest]] [[biome]] that rings the upper latitudes of the northern hemisphere. The Taiga is dominated by black spruce and paper bark birch growing together. The sunlight is low in intensity and there are only 50-100 frost free days during the summer but the taiga is the largest and most productive forest on the planet. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.blueplanetbiomes.org/taiga.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The taiga has very low biodiversity yet [[liberals]] prevent it from being harvested for charcoal and paper production. [[Ted Stevens]] was very supportive of logging the taiga in [[Alaska]]. Each year Alaska looses approximately the area of [[Rhode Island]] to forest fires. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wc.adfg.state.ak.us/index.cfm?adfg=fire.fire5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These forest fires lead to significant air pollution, more particulates than the combined output of all the coal fired power plants in the world, releasing gigatons of [[CO2]] in the process, which is supposed by liberals to lead to global warming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Taiga&amp;diff=849778</id>
		<title>Taiga</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Taiga&amp;diff=849778"/>
		<updated>2011-02-16T23:58:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: Created page with &amp;quot;The Taiga is a forest biome that rings the upper latitudes of the northern hemisphere. The Taiga is dominated by black spruce and paper bark birch growing together. The s...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Taiga is a [[forest]] [[biome]] that rings the upper latitudes of the northern hemisphere. The Taiga is dominated by black spruce and paper bark birch growing together. The sunlight is low in intensity and there are only 50-100 frost free days during the summer but the taiga is the largest and most productive forest on the planet. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.blueplanetbiomes.org/taiga.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The taiga has very low biodiversity yet [[liberals]] prevent it from being harvested for charcoal and paper production. [[Ted Stevens]] was very supportive of logging the taiga in [[Alaska]]. Each year Alaska looses approximately the area of [[Rhode Island]] to forest fires. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wc.adfg.state.ak.us/index.cfm?adfg=fire.fire5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These forest fires lead to significant air pollution, more particulates than the combined output of all the coal fired power plants in the world, releasing gigatons of [[CO2]] in the process, which is supposed by liberals to lead to global warming.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fruit_fly&amp;diff=848067</id>
		<title>Fruit fly</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fruit_fly&amp;diff=848067"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T22:54:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: I can find Alaska in anything!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Female_Mexican_fruit_fly.jpg|thumb|200px|Female Mexican fruit fly]]The name '''fruit flies''' can apply to any [[fly]] of the family ''Tephritidae''. More commonly, however, it refers to the common fruit fly, ''Drosophila melanogaster''. As well as being a common pest, the fruit fly is known for its extensive use in experiments and studies of [[genetics]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Fruits|Fruit]] flies tend to be drawn to any sources of rotten or fermenting [[food]]. They reproduce by laying eggs (up to 500) among organic waste. The larvae, [[maggot|maggots]], will then hatch and feed. The lifecycle from [[egg]] to adult can be completed in about a week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Sarah Palin]] drew [[liberal]] criticism in the 2008 presidential election for pointing to fruit fly research in Paris, France as an example of poor use of public funds.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/oct/27/sarahpalin-genetics-fruit-flies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Unfortunately for the liberals who defended the project based on ''D. melanogaster'' genetic progress the research Palin was highlighting had nothing to do with genetics; the study in question was focused on the ecology of the Olive Fruit Fly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ca.uky.edu/entomology/entfacts/ef621.asp Fruit Flies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Insects]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Salmon&amp;diff=848037</id>
		<title>Salmon</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Salmon&amp;diff=848037"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T20:37:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: Getting the ball rolling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Atlantic Salmon s.jpg|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Salmon''' are a polyphyletic grouping of fish in the family Salmonidae. Most salmon are anadromous, hatching out in a gravel nest called a &amp;quot;Red&amp;quot; in a fresh water stream, then swimming out to salt water and growing to full size on a marine diet. After 2-5 years (depending on species) at sea they swim back to the stream where they hatched based on a combination of magnetic navigation and an acute sense of smell. Most Salmon return to the exact stream where they hatched.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Salmon was an important canned fish product before the wide spread popularity of canned tuna. Since the advent of [[salmon farming]] salmon has become the most popular fresh or frozen fish eaten by american families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.fws.gov/pacific/webcam/ Little White Salmon National Fish Hatchery, Salmon Cam, live from the Pacific Northwest] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fish]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Desk/Miscellany&amp;diff=848036</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Desk/Miscellany</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Desk/Miscellany&amp;diff=848036"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T20:16:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* Sysop conservative contact */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;[[Conservapedia:Desk|Back to the Desk]]&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;General Messages&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;=&lt;br /&gt;
Archives: [[Conservapedia:Desk/Miscellany/Archive1|1]] [[Conservapedia:Desk/Miscellany/Archive2|2]] [[Conservapedia:Desk/Miscellany/Archive3|3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;lt;hiero&amp;gt; tag and WikiHiero ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it possible to introduce support for WikiHiero on Conservapedia? On Wikipedia it is possible to insert hieroglyphs into an article using this tag along with the WikiHiero syntax to enter the signs correctly. It'd be useful to have this feature here too.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Krysg|Krysg]] 07:54, 10 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Someone is trying to steal my password ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recently received this E-mail:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Someone (probably you, from IP address 92.16.2.122)&lt;br /&gt;
 requested that we send you a new password for Conservapedia (http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php).&lt;br /&gt;
 The password for user &amp;quot;Kuyper&amp;quot; is now &amp;quot;[removed]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
 You should log in and change your password now.&lt;br /&gt;
 If someone else made this request or if you have remembered your password and you no longer wish to change it, &lt;br /&gt;
 you may ignore this message and continue using your old password.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You might want to consider looking into this as hacking is a serious problem. [[User:Kuyper|Kuyper]] 16:50, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The operative phrase is below. There wasn't any &amp;quot;hacking&amp;quot; or even &amp;quot;cracking&amp;quot; here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''If someone else made this request or if you have remembered your password and you no longer wish to change it, &lt;br /&gt;
''you may ignore this message and continue using your old password.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:57, 21 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to edit? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I read the article on Barak Obama.  Basically, it is a train wreck.  I am not an expert on him, but I thought I could at least take out all the snide innuendo's, and even if the artilce is much shorter, at least it will be more credible.  He is, after all, the President of the United States, and deserves some minimal respect.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, I have no idea how to edit articles on this thing, and there is just about no help or assistance.  It certainly does not seem to be user friendly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, I am just about ready to give up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also read the article on Virgnia, since that is where I am from.  Under the list of counties, it only had about half of them.  It was a terribel article.  I do not understand how this organizaiton works, but many of the articles are not vey good, and then when you invite people to edit them, how do we do it?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sincerely&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Daniel Sharp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: With all due respect, your misspellings are the worst I've seen.  Please improve and then try to improve the Virginia article, with good spelling.  Thanks much, and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:44, 18 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: As well as the links that I've just put on your user talk page, see [[Help:Contents]] for some more advice.  However, that help is not designed for someone who has never edited a Wiki before.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:37, 18 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Daniel Sharp is also user [[user talk:Lucyjordan|Lucy Jordan]]?  I'm really confused here. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:52, 19 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are some very serious problems with the entries concerning topics related to Confucianism. Many of entries are not strictly incorrect but are sufficiently superficial to be grossly misleading. When it comes to topics as foreign as Confucianism, brevity is not your friend. I will try to help, but unfortunately I do not have the time or the resources to do everything that needs doing. You need a total overhaul.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Noah's Ark Page Locked==&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to create responses to the criticisms on the [[Noah's Ark]] article but the page has been locked by an administrator. The problem is that the locking admin (MountainDew/DanH) is MIA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can I get a little help? [[User:CherylE|CherylE]] 12:54, 29 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
: I've unlocked it.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 15:02, 29 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Multiple Problems ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've made many edits this month, but most of them have disappeared from &amp;quot;my contributions&amp;quot; and from the pages I edited. Also, many of the math pages (e.g. [[Covariance]]) can't display formulas properly. Finally, another user made an edit to my user page a while ago. But that edit has also disappeared from the record. What's going on? [[User:Sjay|Sjay]] 21:11, 30 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Conservapedia suffered a hard drive failure earlier this week. We restored up until the 19th, and are adding more current revisions manually, as we find them viable.  Sorry for the loss, it has effected all of us. Look for bits and pieces to appear back slowly, bit by bit. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:17, 31 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*The hard drive failure explains the missing edits, but why isn't the math environment working? The following should appear as an equation, but doesn't:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\mbox{E}\left[T\right]=&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{cases}&lt;br /&gt;
\mu\sqrt{\frac{\nu}{2}}\frac{\Gamma((\nu-1)/2)}{\Gamma(\nu/2)}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;\nu&amp;gt;1\\&lt;br /&gt;
\mbox{Does not exist}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;\nu\le1\\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{cases}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*At the moment, this problem is present on every page I've looked at ([[Linear model]], [[Normal distribution]], etc...). [[User:Sjay|Sjay]] 10:34, 31 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The math problems are a problem related to moving to a new server. Other, more major issues are taking priority over the math. I'll get to is soon though. [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 16:30, 3 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Messed up linking... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I created a new page for the Show hannity that took over Hannity and colmes. I'm not sure what I did, but linking to [[Hannity &amp;amp; Colmes]] directs to [[Hannity]]. If an admin could let me know what I did wrong so I can fix it, that would be great. Thanks.--[[User:TylerG|Tyler]] 23:58, 1 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
: Well I found the problem, [[Hannity &amp;amp; Colmes]] is for some reason linking to [[Hannity]] and not [[Hannity and Colmes]]...--[[User:TylerG|Tyler]] 00:04, 2 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: We've had problems in the past with ampersands in article names, although I thought that problem had disappeared.  Perhaps it is back again.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:16, 3 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New outage? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The past few times I've checked the site all the pages were protected. One time was around 3PM. Was there an extension of the 1-6AM closing?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:CMcFreeze|CMcFreeze]] 09:55, 8 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservapedia's editing is turned off over-night, for all but Administrators and specially righted editors.  That would generally be between Midnight and 6:00AM, Eastern Standard Time, U.S. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:02, 8 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wikipedia==&lt;br /&gt;
Article [[Wikipedia]] says &amp;quot;Wikipedia bills itself as a democracy.&amp;quot; However, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_democracy here], Wikipedia clearly does not bill itself as a democracy. Regards, [[User:J|J]] 19:57, 21 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Requested move of [[Hull City F.C.]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not sure if this is the right place, but can the article [[Hull City F.C.]] please be moved to [[Hull City A.F.C]], as that is the correct name of the club. (see the badge and the club website [http://www.hullcityafc.net/page/World/ here]. Thanks, [[User:Ozoo|Ozoo]] 14:56, 26 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Done. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:51, 26 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to start? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just joined and want to edit an article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I know that part of the information is incorrect should I first describe the changes I'm going to make on the talk page or should I just go ahead and make the changes?  {{Unsigned|ChrisMH -- 09:08, 1 December 2009 (EST)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Glad you joined!  In my totally unofficial opinion:  If the article's been undergoing a lot of controversy recently, or if there's been controversy before about the issues you want to address, I'd describe the changes.  If it's been undergoing a lot of editing recently, and the changes are major, I'd describe them.  Otherwise, I'd go right ahead and edit; if someone objects, he can always (revert and) describe his objections.  This's what I'd do; it's definitely not official policy.  --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 11:27, 1 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Chris, the important thing to remember is that encyclopedia's rely on ''facts''.  '''That means having verifiable sources included with your edits.'''  If you or I know something is a fact, and we add it to an article, that doesn't help other users without their ability to confirm it with a reliable source.  Please check the links I placed on your talk page, including our Manual of Style for help.  Our Guidelines will also be of help.  Remember part of your online reputation includes not using anonymous proxies to mask your location.  That said, welcome to you as well, and that is the ''official'' word on your question! --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:43, 1 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed your main page states &amp;quot;wikiproject&amp;quot; - I recommend changing to &amp;quot;pediaproject&amp;quot; or something along those lines; don't want to reinforce or reference wikipedia, sticking to conservapedia. sw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technical problem creating AT&amp;amp;T article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've recently attempted to create an article about telephone giant [[AT&amp;amp;T]], but having technical difficulties. The article is created, but attempting to view the article results in an error message stating that there is no article for &amp;quot;AT.&amp;quot; Basically, attempting to view &amp;quot;AT&amp;amp;T&amp;quot; results in &amp;quot;AT&amp;quot; being displayed. Anyway we can fix this? AT&amp;amp;T is the largest telephone provider worldwide, certainly worthy of an article if [[Vodafone]] is. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 22:21, 27 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Keep Needing to Reset My Password ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I apologize if I'm posting this in the wrong place; I'm still relatively new here. After I log out every time, the next time I log in, the form says that my password is incorrect. I e-mail myself a new password, then promptly change my password to something new. The website accepts it and I log in, but after I log out and try to log back in, the same situation happens. Could this because I'm trying to log in from a blocked IP? I'm at a university campus where account creation is blocked by IP, but I spoke with TK and was cleared to create an account from my home IP. Thank you for the help! [[User:Tzoran|Tzoran]] 14:50, 1 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My new article. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi there. I've added the article [[Nick Clegg]]. I've researched it, and tried to make it work. I'd really appreciate if somebody would take a look and let me know if it's the right kind of style. Thank you. --[[User:Newton|Newton]] 12:21, 11 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good start. I made a few changes. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:37, 11 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Regarding the UK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello. I'd like to take a serious role in the UK side of Conservapedia, and try to get some serious articles done about the United Kingdom from a proper Christian conservative point of view. Peraonlly, I think that all of the political parties in the United Kingdom are liberal.. it's just a matter of being more or less liberal. But that's just my opinion. Anyway, sorry for rambling...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If any of the administrators would like to request an article about the UK, please let me know on my talk page. I'm more than happy to accept writing assignments. Who knows? Maybe if I write enough good articles, you'll come to think of me as your 'UK Politics &amp;amp; Religion Editor.' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to bed now, take care. --[[User:Newton|Newton]] 23:49, 25 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks, Newton!  Dive right in, and I am certain any of us who see the need will do as you ask and post on your talk page. I am sure many of the U.K articles we have are in need, as some I have spotted misleading information and removed it.  --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:58, 26 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is there a way that I could possibly edit during your night-time period? Who would I speak to about this? At the moment, I can't edit before 10am. On days when I'm in class, I'm often up at 7am or 8am, and have a lot of free time to edit. --[[User:Newton|Newton]] 19:12, 26 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry Newton, you have to earn that through contributions--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 19:16, 26 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Okay, that's reasonable. Thanks for your quick reply. --[[User:Newton|Newton]] 19:20, 26 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Pcook]] is on a vandalism spree, please block him!!! I can't edit the abuse reports section!&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Newton|Newton]] 13:31, 29 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Wuhao1911 blocked him, thank you. I have removed all of his edits. At first I just removed the obvious vandalism, but then I noticed the blasphemous comments and that he has inserted parts into peoples' debate arguements, so it is all gone. [[User:Newton|Newton]] 13:34, 29 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:YeVeg]] (is that how you type a username?) is engaging in excessive vandalism, some of it racist. [[User:RichardKerry|RichardKerry]] 08:04, 16 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Content for Geeks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've noticed that Conservapedia seems to lack some content that could be useful to geeks.  Being a geek myself, I was wondering if I could write or at least recommend articles to be written or updated for the geek/technophile audience.  Articles for [[HTTP]] and [[XML]] are missing entirely.  Examples could be added to [[Java]], [[SQL]], and [[JavaScript]].  Finally, [[XHTML]] could probably be set as a redirect to [[HTML]] in the way [[Kitty]] redirects to [[Cat]].  This is just an idea, please don't flame me. ([[User:JlHawkwell|JlHawkwell]] 14:25, 2 August 2010 (EDT))&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are registered here, and adding technical articles such as you suggest doesn't need permission or discussion to add, JlHawkwell. Please proceed! --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:35, 2 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What should I edit? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you mind if I do some massive expansion of chemistry articles here? --[[User:LanthanumK|L]][[User talk:LanthanumK|K]] 10:07, 16 November 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe Mr. Schlafly responded to this same question on his talk page, so please proceed. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:27, 16 November 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Slug&amp;quot; article - Candidate For Deletion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't mean to complain, but the article &amp;quot;Slug&amp;quot; is just so embarrassingly bad in so many different ways that it should be deleted.  I don't have the energy to write an article on slugs - because this thing is not really editable - somebody should start over.  [[User:PaulBurnett|PaulBurnett]] 00:47, 27 November 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Looks like Karajou removed the false information that was added by vandal trolls, Paul.  I think you can now delete such articles or alter them, as you see fit. :D  --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:56, 27 November 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 403 Errors ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I participate as a Conservative on another board. One of the members of my group has been a regular user of Conservapedia, but recently began having difficulty accessing your site. She is getting 403 errors. I would appreciate it if you would give me an e-mail address that I can pass on to her so that she may contact someone with your site in order to find out why she is being forbidden access.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any assistance you can provide will be greatly appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Contact info for this account-related issue is on the front page:  conservapedia@zoho.com .  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:35, 5 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sysop conservative contact ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User_talk:Conservative]] is locked, and his email is disabled, I don't feel like it's a good plan to make communication so very very difficult. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 15:16, 9 February 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ted_Stevens&amp;diff=848015</id>
		<title>Ted Stevens</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ted_Stevens&amp;diff=848015"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T18:46:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* Legal Troubles */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Ted Stevens.jpg|right|thumb|Ted Stevens]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Theodore Fulton &amp;quot;Ted&amp;quot; Stevens''' (born November 18, 1923, died August 9, 2010) is a former [[United States Senate|United States Senator]] from [[Alaska]]. He is a [[liberal]] [[Republican Party|Republican]] having a pro-[[abortion]] voting record.  Among [[conservatives]] he is known as a &amp;quot;[[RINO]]&amp;quot; who has long favored more government spending, particularly for his own state.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stevens' lifetime ACU rating is only 64.45, far lower than [[John McCain]]'s rating of 82.16.  Most [[conservatives]] rank over 90 on this rating.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the longest serving [[Republican]] in the Senate, Stevens served as President pro tempore of the United States Senate from January 3, 2003, to January 3, 2007. Stevens chaired the Senate [[Appropriations Committee]] from 1997 to 2005, except for the 18 months when [[Democrat]]s controlled the chamber. The chairmanship gave Stevens considerable influence over fellow Senators, who relied on him for home-state project funds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens had a six-decade career of public service, beginning with his service in [[World War II]]. In the 1950s, he held senior positions in the Interior and Justice departments during the [[Eisenhower]] administration. He has served continuously in the Senate since 1968, until his ouster in 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On July 29, 2008, Stevens was indicted on 7 felony counts related to making false statements in relation to a Justice Department investigation of business dealings in Alaska. Senator [[Arlen Specter]] expressed the disbelief and dismay felt by many in reaction to the bogus charges, &amp;quot;I've known Ted Stevens for 28 years and I've always known him to be impeccably honest. I don't know that there's a stronger comment to be made than that.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=5472829 Republican Senator Indicted for Allegedly Lying on Financial Disclosure Forms], Jake Tapper and Theresa Cook, ABCNews, July 29, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Republican Senate caucus rules, Stevens resigned from his post as ranking member of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee.  On October 27, Stevens was found guilty on all 7 counts of corruption. On April 1, 2009, the Justice department filed a motion to drop its case against Stevens. Attorney General [[Eric Holder]] decided to abandon the case due to prosecutorial misconduct. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/01/doj-sources-say-case-dropped-ex-sen-ted-stevens/ Justice Department Files Motion to Drop Case Against Former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens], Mike Levine, ''FOXNews.com'', April 01, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=102589818 Justice Dept. Seeks To Void Stevens' Conviction], Nina Totenberg, ''NPR'', April 01, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 2010, Ted Stevens died in a small plane crash along with five others. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/08/10/national/main6760221.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This was not the first plane crash he had been in, in 1978 his first wife, Ann Mary, died in a plane crash that also left him with lasting injuries &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-alaska-crash-past-20100811,0,7987348.story&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early years==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ted Stevens was born in [[Indianapolis]], [[Indiana]], in 1923. During World War II, he was an Army Air Forces C-47 pilot in the China-Burma-India theater with the &amp;quot;Flying Tigers&amp;quot; of the Fourteenth Air Force from 1943 to 1946, holding the rank of First Lieutenant. There he received two [[Distinguished Flying Cross]]es and two [[Air Medal]]s, as well as the [[Yuan Hai]] medal awarded by the Republic of [[China]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the war, Stevens attended UCLA, where he was a member of [[Delta Kappa Epsilon]], and [[Harvard Law School]]. In the early 1950s he moved to Alaska, then a territory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Fairbanks, Stevens practiced law, and he was appointed U.S. Attorney for Fairbanks in 1953.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1956, Stevens was transferred to Washington, D.C., where he worked as legislative counsel and assistant to Secretary of the Interior Fred Seaton. He also pushed for the statehood of Alaska and Hawaii, which occurred in 1959. In 1960, then-President Dwight D. Eisenhower promoted Stevens to solicitor of the Department of the Interior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After returning to Alaska, Stevens practiced law in Anchorage. He was elected to the Alaska House of Representatives in 1964, and became House majority leader in his second term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==U.S. Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In December 1968, Governor Walter Joseph Hickel appointed Stevens to the U.S. Senate after the death of Democrat Bob Bartlett. In 1970, Stevens was elected to finish the term in a special election, and has been reelected six times since, in 1972, 1978, 1984, 1990, 1996 and 2002. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens served as the Assistant Republican Whip from 1977 to 1985. In 1994, Stevens was appointed Chairman of the Senate Rules Committee. Stevens became the Senate's president pro tempore when Republicans regained control of the chamber as a result of the 2002 mid-term elections, during which the previous most senior republican senator and former president pro tempore Strom Thurmond retired. He is a former Chairman of the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee and the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee. In the past, Stevens also has served as Chairman of the Senate Ethics Committee, the Arms Control Observer Group, and the Joint Committee on the Library of Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His campaign political action committee is called the &amp;quot;Northern Lights PAC.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ted Stevens was criticized when he attempted to [[earmark]] the &amp;quot;Bridge to Nowhere,&amp;quot; a bridge in Alaska which would have connected the town of [[Ketchikan]] (population 8,900) with its airport on the island of Gravina (population 50) at a cost to federal taxpayers of $320 million, by way of three separate earmarks in a highway bill. A ferry service runs to the island, but some in the town complained about its wait (15 to 30 minutes) and fee ($6 per car). The Heritage Foundation maintained that &amp;quot;the Gravina Island bridge project is an embarrassment to the people of Alaska and the U.S. Congress...fiscally responsible Members of Congress should be eager to zero out its funding.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/wm889.cfm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Copyright controversy and &amp;quot;Series of Tubes&amp;quot; phenomenon==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002, Stevens cosponsored a controversial bill called the Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act (CBDTPA). Put forth by former Democratic Senator [[Fritz Hollings]], if the bill had been passed, it would have forced all computer manufacturers to include inherent forms of copy protection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2002/03/51245&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was held unfavorably by open-source activists and developers, who often referred to Hollings using such titles as &amp;quot;The Disney Senator&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Senator Mickey&amp;quot; due to his ties to the entertainment industry.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,47296,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This bill was never passed into law, though similar private efforts are occurring.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/can-you-trust.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006, Stevens spoke before Congress in opposition to [[net neutrality]]. However, his speech was viewed as &amp;quot;rambling&amp;quot; and lacking basic knowledge of computers - for example, saying &amp;quot;an Internet&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;an e-mail message&amp;quot;, claiming the Internet was not used for commercial purposes, and in a failed attempt to summarize technical definition of &amp;quot;pipe&amp;quot; - referred to the Internet as a &amp;quot;series of tubes&amp;quot;. This became a major Internet fad.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://entertainment.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/07/03/0643238&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Legal Troubles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July of 2008, Stevens was indicted on charges of taking gifts from the oil servicing company VECO and its CEO Bill Allen who benefited from his legislation. Stevens' son Ben, the leader of the state senate, and other state politicians have also been implicated in corruption related to VECO.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2008/07/31/vo.stevens.court.depart.cnn?iref=videosearch Stevens pleads not guilty]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On October 27th, 2008, Stevens was convicted on seven counts of corruption, after a highly politicized trial that attempted to learn the extent of his dealings.&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens, however, vowed to continue his bid.  On November 18th, Stevens' 85th birthday, the final vote tallies showed that Democrat Mark Begich had won the election by a narrow margin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/stevens Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens loses re-election bid]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stevens' conviction was later overturned after U.S. Attorney General [[Eric Holder]] requested the presiding Judge to vacate the conviction because of prosecutorial misconduct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The prosecutor later committed suicide.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/28/us/politics/28stevens.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Ted_Stevens.htm On the Issues - Ted Stevens] issue positions and quotes&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/497 &amp;quot;Series of Tubes&amp;quot; speech]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Stevens, Ted}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: 110th United States Congress]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Beaver&amp;diff=847996</id>
		<title>Beaver</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Beaver&amp;diff=847996"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T15:22:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Taxonomy|image = Beaver.jpg|kingdom = Animalia|phylum = Chordata|subphylum = Vertebrata|class = Mammalia|order = Rodentia|suborder = Myomorpha|family = Castoridae|genus = Castor|species = C. canadensis&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;C. fiber}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Beavers''' are two species of large, aquatic, flat-tailed [[rodent]] of the [[Northern hemisphere]]. The only larger rodent is the [[capybara]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beavers live in dams, some of immense size, which they construct by felling waterside trees. Though superficially this can appear destructive, the activities of beavers do much to preserve the existing forms of rivers and stabilize their flow, and provide significant areas of [[wetland]] habitat in their vicinity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beaver fur was formerly much sought after, and unrestricted hunting and trapping has done much to reduce their range both in North America, and in Europe, where it historically became extinct in [[Great Britain]] and [[France]], though reintroduction programs are now underway.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beaver Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*The beaver is the national animal of [[Canada]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*During the 18th century, the beaver was ruled to be a fish by the Roman Catholic Church,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chowdc.org/Papers/Saunders%202001.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the basis of the ''[[Summa Theologica]]''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newadvent.org/summa/3147.htm#8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by [[Thomas Aquinas]]. As such, it may be consumed during Lent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Though very similar in appearance the European beaver (''Castor fiber'') and North American beaver (''Castor canadensis'') cannot hybridize, because the European bever has 48 [[chromosomes]] while the North American beaver has only 40.&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://mfile.akamai.com/27176/wmv/nationalpark.download.akamai.com/27176/prod/yell/photosmultimedia/video/insideyell/wmvs/256/0042e_beaver_256.asx Beaver], Videos © 2008 Yellowstone Association &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Rodents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Lisa_Murkowski&amp;diff=847990</id>
		<title>Talk:Lisa Murkowski</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Lisa_Murkowski&amp;diff=847990"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T15:04:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: Created page with &amp;quot;Believe it or not Lisa's US senate track record represents a decisive tack to the right, she voted with the party something like 98% of the time for the first 4 years, and breaki...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Believe it or not Lisa's US senate track record represents a decisive tack to the right, she voted with the party something like 98% of the time for the first 4 years, and breaking 20% of the time in the last 4 years. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 10:04, 9 February 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lisa_Murkowski&amp;diff=847989</id>
		<title>Lisa Murkowski</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lisa_Murkowski&amp;diff=847989"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T14:58:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: She has many very solidly held positions. And end of life provisions are definitely in the bill and she recognizes that, she says that there are no death panels&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Lisa Murkowski&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Lisa-murkowski.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Verne Martell&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=Roman Catholic&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Alaska&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=December 20, 2002 - Present&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Frank Murkowski]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Lisa Ann Murkowski''', born May 22, 1957 (age {{age|1957|5|22}}), is the senior [[United States]] [[U.S. Senator| Senator]] from [[Alaska]] and a member of the [[Republican Party]]. She is Alaska's first female senator and the first U.S. Senator born in Alaska. In 1998, Murkowski was elected to the Alaska [[House of Representatives]] and had been elected the House Majority Leader for the 2003–2004 session. In December of 2002, her father, Governor [[Frank Murkowski]], appointed her to a vacant seat in the United States Senate, resulting in charges of nepotism. In her 2004 reelection she was considered the [[Democrat|Democrats]] best chance to pick up a seat from an incumbent Republican. Murkowski was elected to a full six year term by a 49%-46% margin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2010 Midterm Elections==&lt;br /&gt;
In a stunning upset, she was defeated for renomination in 2010 by Tea Party favorite and pro-life conservative[[Joe Miller]]. Murkowski ran a write in candidacy, which was especially complicated due to the high rate of non-english speakers who supported her. Approximately 8,000 of the 100,000 write in votes cast for her were misspelled, the most common misspelling was Merkowski, but Murkowsky and Murcowski were also common. For comparison the last major write in candidate, Robin Taylor, who was the Republican party nominee running against a withdrawn candidate and a [[Democrat]] had about 15% misspellings, Robin Taylor is far easier to spell than Lisa Murkowski. The wording of the legislation leads readers to the conclusion that no misspelling is acceptable, even with out misspellings Murkowski won, but the Division of Elections and State and Federal courts choose to take voter intent into account and concluded that all votes that where phonetically identical to Murkowski should be counted for her. The legislation was rewritten early in the 2011 legislative session with bipartisan support in order to avoid repeat problems in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political views==&lt;br /&gt;
Murkowski has earned a reputation as a &amp;quot;[[moderate Republican]]&amp;quot; (i.e. liberal); she is a [[RINO]], Republican-in-name-only, according to Tea Party conservatives and [[Rush Limbaugh]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Rush Limbaugh]].[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111710/content/01125110.guest.html Lisa Murkowksi, RINO Run Wild], RushLimbaugh.com, November 17, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Murkowski has said this of the [[Obama administration]] and [[President Obama]] in particular: &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I will tell you, I am not one of those who wants Obama to fail.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Rush Limbaugh]]. [http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/content/home/daily/site_111610/content/01125107.guest.html Lisa Murkowski is an Idiot], RushLimbaugh.com, November 16, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She is also a member of several abortion rights groups such as The Republican Majority For Choice, Republicans For Choice and The Wish List. Murkowski voted to ban [[partial birth abortion]] and to make it a criminal penalty for harming an unborn fetus during other crimes. Lisa Murkowski received a 14% rating from [[NARAL Pro-Choice America]], and she describes herself as &amp;quot;[[pro-choice]].&amp;quot; Murkowski likewise is a strong advocate of taxpayer-funded human embryo experimentation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Murkowski is one of ten Republican Senators who refused to commit to Senate Majority Leader [[Bill Frist]]'s &amp;quot;nuclear option&amp;quot; to end judicial filibusters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lisa Murkowski supports oil exploration in her home state of Alaska, saying that recent technological developments have reduced the environmental risks of drilling in ANWR.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2009, Murkowski authored legislation that would ban the [[Environmental Protection Agency]] from regulating carbon dioxide, which is opposed by the [[Obama administration]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27509.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Murkowski uses her position as the ranking republican on the Senate appropriations committee to gain pork expenditures for Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When [[Obamacare]] passed, most Republicans were talking repeal. Murkowski said repealing was not possible. Also, she disputed [[Sarah Pali]]&lt;br /&gt;
s claim that there were death panel provisions in the bill. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Murkowski voted for [[TARP]] and the &amp;quot;Son of Stimulus&amp;quot;- the 2009 Obama Omnibus spending bill. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/111/senate/1/votes/96/ On the Cloture Motion H.R. 1105, Washington Post, March 10, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://murkowski.senate.gov/ Official Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Lisa_Murkowski.htm On the Issues]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/m001153/ Voting Record]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opencongress.org/people/show/300075_lisa_murkowski OpenCongress]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Murkowski, Lisa Ann}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: 110th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:111th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alaska]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joe_Miller&amp;diff=847988</id>
		<title>Talk:Joe Miller</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joe_Miller&amp;diff=847988"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T14:54:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: Created page with &amp;quot;Joe Miller Lost the election himself, Murkowski definitely exploited his poor decisions. Also I ascribe to the notion that law and legislation are as different as wealth and mone...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Joe Miller Lost the election himself, Murkowski definitely exploited his poor decisions. Also I ascribe to the notion that law and legislation are as different as wealth and money. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 09:54, 9 February 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joe_Miller&amp;diff=847987</id>
		<title>Joe Miller</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joe_Miller&amp;diff=847987"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T14:50:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: Still more work&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Portrait miller.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joseph &amp;quot;Joe&amp;quot; Miller''' (born May 10, 1967 in Osborne, Kansas) is an attorney and [[Republican]] nominee for [[U.S. Senate]] in [[Alaska]] for the [[2010 Midterm Elections|2010 General Election]] after defeating [[Lisa Murkowski]]. Joe Miller's campaign focus is on beating the Democrats with a message of limited federal government and states' rights in November. Miller is a graduate from the [[United States Military Academy]] at [[West Point]], earned a Juris Doctor at [[Yale|Yale Law School]], and a Masters degree in economics from the [[University of Alaska]]. Miller received a bronze star for his service as a M1A1 tank platoon leader in the first [[Gulf War]]. The young first lieutenant was entrusted with leading the 1st Combat Brigade's 93-mile road march that preceded the sweep into [[Iraq]] and [[Kuwait]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://articles.latimes.com/2010/sep/07/nation/la-na-alaska-miller-20100907/2 For Alaska's restive right, it's Joe Miller time, LA Times, Septemeber 7, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2002, he was appointed a United States Magistrate Judge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 2010 Election == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Miller defeated incumbent [[RINO]] Lisa Murkowski for the Republican nomination. He was able to do this because of his solid conservative positions, Sarah Palin and Tea Party support. Joe Miller did not effectively handle the liberal media, even going so far as to have one reporter and online news magazine editor handcuffed by a heavy handed security detail he inexplicably brought to a middle school.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adn.com/2010/10/17/1506223/miller-security-guards-handcuff.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Selfish and arrogant, Murkowski decided to run as a write-in candidate. Murkowski was able to secure millions of dollars in advertising from the [[Alaska Native Corporations]], and other native groups that Murkowski fought to get earmarks for. The Democrat candidate was weak and 30% of Democrats voted for the independent Murkowski. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/10/03/Murkowski-write-in-drawing-Democrat-votes/UPI-12251286141617/ Murkowski write-in drawing Democrat votes, UPI.com, October 3, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Miller disputed the election results citing Alaska legislation which states that the name written in must be the same as the candidates name &amp;quot;as it appears&amp;quot; on the candidates write-in paperwork, but Murkowski beat Miller by nearly 10,000 votes, only 8,000 of which were challenged on these grounds.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.elections.alaska.gov/results/10GENR/data/results.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/121210/loc_755533373.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Miller's insistence that the courts follow the legislation as written prior to November 2010. The State of Alaska, Alaska case law, and federal election guidelines all indicated before the election, that voter intent is the important factor for determining if a vote should be counted. That law was amended in January 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tea Party Movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sarah Palin]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tea Party Express]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Senate Conservatives Fund]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://joemiller.us/ Joe Miller for U.S. Senate]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://joemiller.us/issues Joe Miller] - On the Issues&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://joemiller.us/endorsements Alaskans Endorse Joe Miller]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.facebook.com/JoeMillerAlaska Facebook page]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://twitter.com/JoeWMiller Twitter page]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.youtube.com/joemillerus YouTube channel]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.flickr.com/photos/joewmiller/ Flickr page]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.linkedin.com/in/joewmiller Linkedin page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Miller, Joe}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2010 Midterm Elections]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tea Party Movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{conservatism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alaska&amp;diff=847934</id>
		<title>Alaska</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alaska&amp;diff=847934"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T04:31:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: Just a quick start, about to go to meet my brother at a bar.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{USState&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Alaska&lt;br /&gt;
|flag=Alaska_State_Flag.gif&lt;br /&gt;
|motto=North to the Future&lt;br /&gt;
|nick=The Last Frontier&lt;br /&gt;
|capital=Juneau&lt;br /&gt;
|language=English&lt;br /&gt;
|governor=Sean Parnell&lt;br /&gt;
|gparty=Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|senator1=Lisa Murkowski&lt;br /&gt;
|s1party=Republican &lt;br /&gt;
|s1phone=(202) 224-6665&lt;br /&gt;
|s1email=http://murkowski.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactMe.EMailLisa Contact&lt;br /&gt;
|senator2=Mark Begich&lt;br /&gt;
|s2party=Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|s2phone=(202) 224-3004&lt;br /&gt;
|s2email=mailto:senator@begich.senate.gov Contact&lt;br /&gt;
|population=&lt;br /&gt;
|date=January 3, 1959&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Alaska''' became the forty-ninth [[state]] to enter into the [[United States of America]] in 1959.  Alaska is not contiguous to the rest of the United States, bordering [[Canada]]'s [[Yukon Territory]] and province of [[British Columbia]] to the east.  Its [[capital]] is [[Juneau]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alaska's territory was purchased from [[Russia]] in 1867 by the Johnson administration for 7.2 million [[Dollar|USD]]; its vast [[oil]] and [[gold]] reserves have more than repaid the investment that was once ridiculed as &amp;quot;Seward's Folly.&amp;quot;, after [[William Seward|William H. Seward]] who was the [[Secretary of State]] that negotiated the purchase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although it is the largest state by area, it is the third smallest state by population (larger than only [[Wyoming]] and [[Vermont]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Elected Officials==&lt;br /&gt;
===Federal===&lt;br /&gt;
*Senator [[Lisa Murkowski]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Senator [[Mark Begich]] (D)&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Don Young]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Statewide===&lt;br /&gt;
*Governor [[Sean Parnell]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lt. Governor [[Mead Treadwell]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politics of Alaska==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alaska is a [[Republican]] stronghold with a [[libertarian]] streak. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://election.nationaljournal.com/states/ak.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[George W. Bush]] carried the state 59%-28% in 2000, 61%-36% in 2004, and [[John McCain]] 59%-38% in 2008. The legislature is controlled by Republicans. In 2008 Mark Begich became the first [[Democrat]] elected to [[Congress]] from Alaska since 1974.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
Alaska's economy consists of three main sectors. Firstly there is mineral resources, in the form of oil and coal and gold and silver and a variety of other metals. Secondly there is commercial fishing, primarily salmon, king crab, halibut, grey cod, and pollack. Finally there is federal spending, Alaska receives more federal spending per citizen than any other state, getting about two dollars in federal spending for every tax dollar sent to the IRS.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Energy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Alaska-oil.jpg|thumb|300px|right]][[File:Oil-symbol.jpg|thumb|300px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Alaska has vast energy resources but low energy demand. Major oil and gas reserves are found in the Alaska North Slope (ANS) and Cook Inlet basins. The Alaska North Slope contains 14 of the 100 largest oil fields in the United States, and two of the largest natural gas fields. The North Slope’s Prudhoe Bay field is the largest oil field in the country. Substantial coal deposits are found in Alaska’s bituminous, sub-bituminous, and lignite coal basins. Alaska’s numerous rivers offer some of the highest hydroelectric power potential in the country, and large swaths of the Alaskan coastline offer wind and geothermal energy potential. The oil and gas industry dominates the Alaskan economy, and production activities drive state energy demand. Nevertheless, overall state energy demand is low.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/state/state_energy_profiles.cfm?sid=AK Energy Information Administration, State Report 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alaska is the second-ranked oil-producing State (after Texas), if output from the Federal Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) is excluded from the State totals. Nearly all of Alaska’s oil production takes place on the North Slope. The Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) transports crude oil from the frozen North Slope to the warm-water Port of Valdez, on Alaska’s southern coast. From Valdez, tankers ship the ANS crude oil primarily to refineries in California and Washington State. Those refineries are designed to process the intermediate, sour (high-sulfur) crude oil from the ANS. Alaskan crude oil production has been in decline since 1988, when output peaked at over 2 million barrels per day. However, experts believe that large oil and gas reserves in the State remain untapped, and some have called for the Federal government to open more public lands, including the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, for oil exploration and drilling. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand for finished petroleum products in Alaska is low. Although Alaska has six refineries, most of them are “topping” plants that strip away lighter products from the TAPS heavy crude oil stream for internal refinery use. State motor gasoline demand is primarily met by refineries in Kenai and near Fairbanks. The use of oxygenated motor gasoline is required in the Fairbanks and Anchorage areas during their winter months. Jet fuel consumption in Alaska is high compared to other States. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to harsh weather conditions that persist throughout most of the year, Alaska’s oil infrastructure is particularly vulnerable to weather-related accidents and disruptions. The worst accident occurred in March 1989, when the tank vessel &amp;quot;[[Exxon Valdez]]&amp;quot; struck Bligh Reef and spilled 260 thousand barrels of oil into the Prince William Sound, though this was primarily due to the captain and crew drinking heavily instead of focusing on navigation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notable People from Alaska==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sarah Palin]], former governor, GOP vice presidential nominee 2008, conservative leader&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Carlos Boozer]] ([[Utah Jazz]] basketball player) &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jewel (singer)|Jewel]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Valerie Plame]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==State Motto==&lt;br /&gt;
''“North to the Future”'' The motto was chosen in 1967 during the Alaska Purchase centennial and was created by Juneau newsman Richard Peter. The motto is meant to represent Alaska as a land of promise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://arcticcam.com/cam/ Live image from Fairbanks, Alaska]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.state.ak.us/ State of Alaska Home page]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.travelalaska.com/ State of Alaska Travel and Vacation Information]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====references====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USstates}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alaska]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alaska&amp;diff=847931</id>
		<title>Alaska</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alaska&amp;diff=847931"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T04:18:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* Energy */ we can move oil very safely, we just can't do it drunk&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{USState&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Alaska&lt;br /&gt;
|flag=Alaska_State_Flag.gif&lt;br /&gt;
|motto=North to the Future&lt;br /&gt;
|nick=The Last Frontier&lt;br /&gt;
|capital=Juneau&lt;br /&gt;
|language=English&lt;br /&gt;
|governor=Sean Parnell&lt;br /&gt;
|gparty=Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|senator1=Lisa Murkowski&lt;br /&gt;
|s1party=Republican &lt;br /&gt;
|s1phone=(202) 224-6665&lt;br /&gt;
|s1email=http://murkowski.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactMe.EMailLisa Contact&lt;br /&gt;
|senator2=Mark Begich&lt;br /&gt;
|s2party=Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|s2phone=(202) 224-3004&lt;br /&gt;
|s2email=mailto:senator@begich.senate.gov Contact&lt;br /&gt;
|population=&lt;br /&gt;
|date=January 3, 1959&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Alaska''' became the forty-ninth [[state]] to enter into the [[United States of America]] in 1959.  Alaska is not contiguous to the rest of the United States, bordering [[Canada]]'s [[Yukon Territory]] and province of [[British Columbia]] to the east.  Its [[capital]] is [[Juneau]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alaska's territory was purchased from [[Russia]] in 1867 by the Johnson administration for 7.2 million [[Dollar|USD]]; its vast [[oil]] and [[gold]] reserves have more than repaid the investment that was once ridiculed as &amp;quot;Seward's Folly.&amp;quot;, after [[William Seward|William H. Seward]] who was the [[Secretary of State]] that negotiated the purchase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although it is the largest state by area, it is the third smallest state by population (larger than only [[Wyoming]] and [[Vermont]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Elected Officials==&lt;br /&gt;
===Federal===&lt;br /&gt;
*Senator [[Lisa Murkowski]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Senator [[Mark Begich]] (D)&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Don Young]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Statewide===&lt;br /&gt;
*Governor [[Sean Parnell]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lt. Governor [[Mead Treadwell]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politics of Alaska==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alaska is a [[Republican]] stronghold with a [[libertarian]] streak. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://election.nationaljournal.com/states/ak.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[George W. Bush]] carried the state 59%-28% in 2000, 61%-36% in 2004, and [[John McCain]] 59%-38% in 2008. The legislature is controlled by Republicans. In 2008 Mark Begich became the first [[Democrat]] elected to [[Congress]] from Alaska since 1974.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Energy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Alaska-oil.jpg|thumb|300px|right]][[File:Oil-symbol.jpg|thumb|300px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Alaska has vast energy resources but low energy demand. Major oil and gas reserves are found in the Alaska North Slope (ANS) and Cook Inlet basins. The Alaska North Slope contains 14 of the 100 largest oil fields in the United States, and two of the largest natural gas fields. The North Slope’s Prudhoe Bay field is the largest oil field in the country. Substantial coal deposits are found in Alaska’s bituminous, sub-bituminous, and lignite coal basins. Alaska’s numerous rivers offer some of the highest hydroelectric power potential in the country, and large swaths of the Alaskan coastline offer wind and geothermal energy potential. The oil and gas industry dominates the Alaskan economy, and production activities drive state energy demand. Nevertheless, overall state energy demand is low.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/state/state_energy_profiles.cfm?sid=AK Energy Information Administration, State Report 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alaska is the second-ranked oil-producing State (after Texas), if output from the Federal Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) is excluded from the State totals. Nearly all of Alaska’s oil production takes place on the North Slope. The Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) transports crude oil from the frozen North Slope to the warm-water Port of Valdez, on Alaska’s southern coast. From Valdez, tankers ship the ANS crude oil primarily to refineries in California and Washington State. Those refineries are designed to process the intermediate, sour (high-sulfur) crude oil from the ANS. Alaskan crude oil production has been in decline since 1988, when output peaked at over 2 million barrels per day. However, experts believe that large oil and gas reserves in the State remain untapped, and some have called for the Federal government to open more public lands, including the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, for oil exploration and drilling. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand for finished petroleum products in Alaska is low. Although Alaska has six refineries, most of them are “topping” plants that strip away lighter products from the TAPS heavy crude oil stream for internal refinery use. State motor gasoline demand is primarily met by refineries in Kenai and near Fairbanks. The use of oxygenated motor gasoline is required in the Fairbanks and Anchorage areas during their winter months. Jet fuel consumption in Alaska is high compared to other States. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to harsh weather conditions that persist throughout most of the year, Alaska’s oil infrastructure is particularly vulnerable to weather-related accidents and disruptions. The worst accident occurred in March 1989, when the tank vessel &amp;quot;[[Exxon Valdez]]&amp;quot; struck Bligh Reef and spilled 260 thousand barrels of oil into the Prince William Sound, though this was primarily due to the captain and crew drinking heavily instead of focusing on navigation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notable People from Alaska==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sarah Palin]], former governor, GOP vice presidential nominee 2008, conservative leader&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Carlos Boozer]] ([[Utah Jazz]] basketball player) &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jewel (singer)|Jewel]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Valerie Plame]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==State Motto==&lt;br /&gt;
''“North to the Future”'' The motto was chosen in 1967 during the Alaska Purchase centennial and was created by Juneau newsman Richard Peter. The motto is meant to represent Alaska as a land of promise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://arcticcam.com/cam/ Live image from Fairbanks, Alaska]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.state.ak.us/ State of Alaska Home page]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.travelalaska.com/ State of Alaska Travel and Vacation Information]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====references====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USstates}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alaska]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lisa_Murkowski&amp;diff=847930</id>
		<title>Lisa Murkowski</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lisa_Murkowski&amp;diff=847930"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T04:15:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Lisa Murkowski&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Lisa-murkowski.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Verne Martell&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=Roman Catholic&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Alaska&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=December 20, 2002 - Present&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Frank Murkowski]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Lisa Ann Murkowski''', born May 22, 1957 (age {{age|1957|5|22}}), is the senior [[United States]] [[U.S. Senator| Senator]] from [[Alaska]] and a member of the [[Republican Party]]. She is Alaska's first female senator and the first U.S. Senator born in Alaska. In 1998, Murkowski was elected to the Alaska [[House of Representatives]] and had been elected the House Majority Leader for the 2003–2004 session. In December of 2002, her father, Governor [[Frank Murkowski]], appointed her to a vacant seat in the United States Senate, resulting in charges of nepotism. In her 2004 reelection she was considered the [[Democrat|Democrats]] best chance to pick up a seat from an incumbent Republican. Murkowski was elected to a full six year term by a 49%-46% margin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2010 Midterm Elections==&lt;br /&gt;
In a stunning upset, she was defeated for renomination in 2010 by Tea Party favorite and pro-life conservative[[Joe Miller]]. Murkowski ran a write in candidacy, which was especially complicated due to the high rate of non-english speakers who supported her. Approximately 8,000 of the 100,000 write in votes cast for her were misspelled, the most common misspelling was Merkowski, but Murkowsky and Murcowski were also common. For comparison the last major write in candidate, Robin Taylor, who was the Republican party nominee running against a withdrawn candidate and a [[Democrat]] had about 15% misspellings, Robin Taylor is far easier to spell than Lisa Murkowski. The wording of the legislation leads readers to the conclusion that no misspelling is acceptable, even with out misspellings Murkowski won, but the Division of Elections and State and Federal courts choose to take voter intent into account and concluded that all votes that where phonetically identical to Murkowski should be counted for her. The legislation was rewritten early in the 2011 legislative session with bipartisan support in order to avoid repeat problems in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political views==&lt;br /&gt;
Lisa Murkowski supports oil exploration in her home state of Alaska, saying that recent technological developments have reduced the environmental risks of drilling in ANWR. Murkowski has a reputation as a &amp;quot;[[moderate Republican]]&amp;quot; (i.e. liberal); she is a [[RINO]] by definition, Republican-in-name-only, according to [[Rush Limbaugh]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Rush Limbaugh]].[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111710/content/01125110.guest.html Lisa Murkowksi, RINO Run Wild], RushLimbaugh.com, November 17, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Murkowski has said this of the [[Obama administration]] and [[President Obama]] in particular: &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I will tell you, I am not one of those who wants Obama to fail.  If he does well that means the country is doing well.  We don't have time as a nation to spend all of what we do blocking.  We have got to figure out how we get to a point where we can be sitting around a table and talking about these difficult problems and advancing some solutions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Rush Limbaugh]]. [http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/content/home/daily/site_111610/content/01125107.guest.html Lisa Murkowski is an Idiot], RushLimbaugh.com, November 16, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
Lisa Murkowski received a 14% rating from [[NARAL Pro-Choice America]], indicating a pro-life voting record although she describes herself as &amp;quot;[[pro-choice]].&amp;quot; She is also a member of several abortion rights groups such as The Republican Majority For Choice, Republicans For Choice and The Wish List. Murkowski voted to ban [[partial birth abortion]] and to make it a criminal penalty for harming an unborn fetus during other crimes. Murkowski likewise is a strong advocate of taxpayer-funded human embryo experimentation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Murkowski is one of ten Republican Senators who refused to commit to Senate Majority Leader [[Bill Frist]]'s &amp;quot;nuclear option&amp;quot; to end judicial filibusters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2009, Murkowski authored legislation that would ban the [[Environmental Protection Agency]] from regulating carbon dioxide, which is opposed by the [[Obama administration]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27509.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Murkowski uses her position as the ranking republican on the senate appropriations committee to pork barrel for Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://murkowski.senate.gov/ Official Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Lisa_Murkowski.htm On the Issues]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/m001153/ Voting Record]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opencongress.org/people/show/300075_lisa_murkowski OpenCongress]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Murkowski, Lisa Ann}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: 110th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:111th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alaska]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&amp;diff=847929</id>
		<title>Sarah Palin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&amp;diff=847929"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T04:11:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Sarah Palin&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Sarah Palin.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Todd Palin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=Christian&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
        |number=11th&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Alaska&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=December 4, 2006 - July 26, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Frank Murkowski]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Sean Parnell]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/mayor&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=&lt;br /&gt;
	|city=Wasilla, Alaska&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=1996–2002&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=John Stein&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=Diane Keller&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sarah Louise Heath Palin''' (pronounced pay'-lynn) (born February 11, 1964) is a [[conservative]] [[Republican Party|Republican]] who served as the 11th [[Governor]] of [[Alaska]] from 2006 through 2009. She is the youngest person to hold this office as well as the first woman to do so in the state's history. On July 3, 2009 Palin announced that she would resign as Governor of Alaska.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/palin_not_running/2009/07/03/231789.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Executive power was transferred to [[Lieutenant Governor]] [[Sean Parnell]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin came to national attention as Senator [[John McCain]]'s Vice Presidential running mate in the [[2008 Presidential Election]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/08/palins_vp_selection_speech.html Acceptance Speech by Palin]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. She was the first woman to appear on a Republican Presidential ticket. She brought a [[populism|populist]] image and a record of cutting wasteful spending and reforming government to McCain's ticket. In the summer of 2007, she was the most popular governor in America, having cut 13% of [[Alaska]]'s budget.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/851orcjq.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She is strongly [[pro-life]] and a prominent spokesperson for [[special needs]] children. In an appearance on August 30, 2008 in Washington, Pennsylvania, she was greeted by a surprisingly large crowd as she promoted the new McCain-Palin ticket. She favors more competition in health care and pushed for abolishing the [[certificate of need]] regulations that interfere with opening new medical clinics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/04/AR2008090403253.html?referrer=emailarticle&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin and her husband [[Todd Palin|Todd]] have been married for 20 years. Todd was a member of the United Steelworkers Union, and their eldest son (of five children) is in the [[United States Army]], having served in [[Iraq]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Her memoir ''[[Going Rogue]]'' was published in November 2009, with Palin drawing large crowds to book signing occasions around the country. She comments regularly on public affairs via her Facebook page, criticizing the &amp;quot;death panels&amp;quot; of the health care reform program and praising President Obama's pro-war speech upon his receiving the [[Nobel]] Peace prize in December 2009. She appears regularly on [[Fox News Channel]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/11/sarah-palin-to-contribute-to-fox-news/?scp=2&amp;amp;sq=Palin&amp;amp;st=cse&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Personal Background==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sarah Palin Todd Trig.jpg|thumb|right|250px|In this April 23, 2008 file photo, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, left, and her husband, Todd Palin, hold their baby boy Trig in Anchorage, Alaska.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Photo courtesy of Newsmax.com'']]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin arrived in Alaska with her family in 1964, when her parents came to teach school in Skagway. Palin attended Wasilla High School where her extracurricular activities included captaining the basketball team  which went on to win the state championship.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama Can't Win Against Palin] Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After graduating in 1982, she went on to college, attending several institutions before she received a bachelor of science degree in communications-journalism from the [[University of Idaho]] in 1987. To earn money for college, Palin entered beauty pageants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She worked in the media and the utility industry before beginning her career in public service 14 years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the course of her 44 years in Alaska she has lived in Skagway, Eagle River and Wasilla. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She is married to [[Todd Palin]], part Yupik [[Eskimo]], who is a lifelong Alaskan. Todd formerly worked at a non-management union job in the oil industry, and also as a commercial salmon fisherman. He is a four-time champion of the Iron Dog, the world's longest snowmobile race. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Todd and Sarah have five children together: Track, Bristol, Willow, Piper, and Trig. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sarah Palin is a [[Labor union|union]] member, a [[moose]] hunter and holds a membership in the [[NRA]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/29/mccain-to-name-running-mate-on-friday/ McCain Names Alaska Gov. Palin as Running Mate] Fox News, August 29, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has been widely praised among conservatives for acting on her [[pro-life]] beliefs in the case of her youngest son, Trig, who was diagnosed with [[Down syndrome]] in the fourth month of her pregnancy. After researching the condition, she and her husband agreed to continue to pregnancy:&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;[My husband Todd said,] we shouldn't be asking 'Why us?' We should be saying 'Well, why not us?' We've both been very vocal about being pro life. We understand that every innocent life has wonderful potential. I'm looking at him right now, and I see perfection. Yeah, he has an extra chromosome. I keep thinking, in our world, what is normal and what is perfect?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.celebrity-babies.com/2008/05/gov-sarah-palin.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=29242 Canadian Doctors 'Fear' Sarah Palin's Choice May Start a Trend] Catholic Online, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trig was born on April 18, 2008, four months before his mother was announced as the vice-presidential candidate. Palin wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;This new person in your life can help everyone put things in perspective and bind us together, and get everyone focused on what really matters ... Those who love him will think less about self and focus less on what the world tells [us] is 'normal' or 'perfect.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;people&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[People magazine]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;It's a sign of the times to be able to do this,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;I can think of so many male candidates who watched a families grow while they were in office. There is no reason to believe a woman can't do it with a growing family. My baby will not be at all or in any sense neglected.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alaska governor balances newborn's needs, official duties [http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-05-10-4082128881_x.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin's older son, Track, serves in the U.S. Army, and was deployed to [[Iraq War|Iraq]] in September 2008. Palin says, &amp;quot;I'm proud of him but I worry.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2008, Palin announced that her daughter Bristol was five months pregnant. After having been given the choice, Bristol bravely chose to keep the child. Palin stated &amp;quot;We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080901/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_palin_daughter Palin says 17-year-old daughter is pregnant]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bristol has since gone on to promote abstinence as a realistic choice for teenagers, stating, &amp;quot;[A]bstinence is the only way you can effectively, 100% foolproof way you can prevent pregnancy.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/nat5025.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  On July 14, 2010 Bristol Palin announced that she and Levi Johnston had become re-engaged and wanted to be married as soon as possible. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://content.usatoday.com/communities/entertainment/post/2010/07/bristol-palin-levi-johnston-are-engaged/1 USA Today; Bristol Palin, Levi Johnston are engaged. Jul 14, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Two weeks later Bristol said the reconciliation was over. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20407608,00.html People Magazine interview; August 3, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palin Family..jpg|thumb|left|Palin family members at the announcement of Palin's vice presidential selection, August 29, 2008. From left: Todd, Piper, Willow, Bristol, and Trig.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political Career==&lt;br /&gt;
Palin was elected to two terms on the Wasilla City Council, and then two terms as the Mayor / Manager of Alaska's fastest growing community (Population: 5400 in 2000)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wasilla.areaconnect.com/statistics.htm Wasilla Population and Demographics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. During her time as mayor, Palin hired a Washington lobbying firm to help secure $8 million in congressionally directed spending projects, otherwise known as earmarks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-08-31-palin-bridge_N.htm Palin backed 'bridge to nowhere' in 2006]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ms. Palin's leadership qualities were recognized when she was elected as President of the Alaska Conference of Mayors. In 2002, she ran for Lieutenant Governor, but came in second in a four-way race. Later that year, when [[Frank Murkowski]] resigned his [[Senate]] seat to become [[governor]], she interviewed for the opening. Instead, Murkowski appointed his daughter to the seat. From there, she went on to run for governor and won, becoming the first female governor of Alaska and its youngest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003, then-Governor Mukowski appointed Palin to serve as Panel Ethics Commissioner of Alaska's Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, which regulates Alaska's [[non-renewable energy|non-renewable]] resources: [[oil]] and [[gasoline|gas]]. She resigned in 2004 as a protest over the &amp;quot;lack of ethics&amp;quot; of fellow panelists who had ignored her complaints of legal violations and conflicts of interest. In a similar vein, Palin took a great political risk by revealing that Randy Reudrich, chairman of the state Republican party, was doing political business on state time. She did this to fulfil a [[conflict of interest]] statement that required her to report such things; to omit the revelation would have been dishonest. But it turned out that this action endeared her to the people of Alaska.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://churchformen.blogspot.com/2008/09/people-around-world-are-asking-who-is.html Sarah Palin, a friend of mine]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To help cultivate influence and political clout in the state, Palin served from 2003 - June, 2005 as one of three directors of the &amp;quot;Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc.&amp;quot;, a 527 group that raised funds from corporate donors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/01/palin_was_a_director_of_embatt.html#more Palin Was a Director of Embattled Sen. Ted Stevens's 527 Group]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The stated purpose of the group is, &amp;quot;To increase the number of Republican women in elected offices and in appointed governmental and political positions, including advisory and regulatory commissions through training and education.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/527/ted_stevens_excellence_in_public_service_inc.asp Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She ran for Governor in 2006 on a clean government platform, and accomplished a political rarity in defeating the incumbent Governor [[Frank Murkowski]] in his own Republican primary. Palin went on to defeat former Governor [[Tony Knowles]] in the general election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She has also served on the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission. She was named one of Alaska's &amp;quot;Top 40 Under 40&amp;quot;, Alaska's Public Works &amp;quot;Person of the Year&amp;quot;, and was recently inducted into the Sigma Beta Delta Honor Society at Alaska Pacific University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has served on numerous boards and commissions throughout the State, and stays active as a marathon runner, sports team mom, hockey manager and school volunteer. A lifetime member of the [[NRA]], she enjoys hunting, fishing and Alaska history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gov.state.ak.us/bio.php Alaska Governor Sarah Palin&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Resignation===&lt;br /&gt;
In July of 2009, Governor Palin held a national press conference to announce that she would resign her office effective July 26, 2009. She explained:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|My choice is to take a stand and effect change – not hit our heads against the wall and watch valuable state time and money, millions of your dollars, go down the drain in this new environment. Rather, we know we can effect positive change outside government at this moment in time, on another scale, and actually make a difference for our priorities – and so we will, for Alaskans and for Americans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gov.state.ak.us/exec-column.php  Executive Column: Palin's resignation announcement]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since, she has faced constant [[liberal]] criticism over her decision not to complete her term of office and for pursuing media and financial opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Record as Governor==&lt;br /&gt;
===Energy and Oil===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin spoke a great deal about harnessing [[oil]] and natural [[gas]] resources, Palin presented the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act (AGIA) in March 2007, which was intended to lead to the construction of a gasline. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsminer.com/news/2008/aug/29/palin-alaska-gasline-inducement-act-nears-completi/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It received bipartisan support and was signed into law by Governor Palin in June. In August of 2008 she signed legislation giving state authority to award TransCanada Corp a license to build and operate a multibillion-dollar pipeline to ship natural gas from the North Slope. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=2e84b1e8-9a4a-4558-ad05-21b517c50fae&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; While this was intended to improve Alaska's economy it became merely a vehicle to pay $37 million to Transcanada with potential libailities for the state of up to half a billion dollars &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adn.com/2011/01/20/1659129/lawmakers-express-frustration.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; all for a pipeline that will not be able to make money for 20 years based on natural gas forecasts &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adn.com/2010/12/22/1616472/report-leaves-pipeline-out-of.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Alaska's law makers are currently looking for ways to exit the Palin plan for a gas line. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adn.com/2011/02/04/1684449/alaska-lawmakers-propose-ditching.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As Governor, Palin created a new subcabinet that develops policies to reduce greenhouse gases and help the state adapt to [[climate change]]. She supports oil production in ANWR, connecting it with national security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GE11URmmnc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007 the housing bubble burst, which did not significantly affect Alaska. It did soften the dollar, which raised the dollar price of oil in the global market with out raising the costs of production, this lead to windfall profits. Over the objections of oil companies, Palin worked with the [[Democrats]] on the Alaska state legislature to approve a major increase in taxes on the oil industry.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008103325_alaskatax07.html Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Alaska's Clear and Equitable Share&amp;quot; (ACES, Lapooned by the conservative talk radio media as Alaskans Clearly Entering Socialism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rick Rydell Radio Program, 650KENI.com, 2/8/2011, 8:43 AM Alaska Standard Time&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.) The state then gave Alaskans a $1200 check to pay for increased gas prices, using the increased revenues from the tax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/palin-backed-alaskan-windfall-profits-tax/ Palin backed Alaskan windfalls-profit tax]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin also announced on May 21, 2008 that the state would challenge a recent listing of [[polar bears]] as a threatened species as she and other Alaska elected officials feared such a listing would cripple oil and gas development in prime polar bear habitat off the state's northern and northwestern coasts. Palin's belief is that there is not enough evidence to support a listing, asserting that polar bears are well-managed and their population has dramatically increased over 30 years as a result of conservation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As governor of Alaska in Jan. 2009, Palin announced support for [[Alternative energy]] programs as she proposed a statewide energy plan that called for 50% of Alaska's power to be generated by renewable resources by 2025.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Dan Joling, &amp;quot;Palin unveils state energy goals,&amp;quot; [http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story/657216.html ''Anchorage Daily News'' Jan. 16, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Reaction to Gulf of Mexico oil spill====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has pointed out how environmentalists are responsible for locking up safer drilling areas on dry land, effectively forcing offshore drilling to become the preferred mode of acquiring oil, thus inviting crisis like the [[Gulf of Mexico oil spill]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.nysun.com/editorials/sarah-palins-way-of-thinking/86988/|work=[[The New York Sun]]|format=HTML|title=Sarah Palin’s Way of Thinking|date=June 5th 2010|language=English|quote=Governor Palin’s point will, we predict, become only more logical in the face of the disaster of the Deepwater Horizon. And she will increasingly come to be seen as having a clear way of thinking. She thinks like an economist. She understands that policies have consequences. If one wants, as the environmentalists have been doing for a decade, to restrict onshore drilling, it is going to incent offshore drilling.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===State Economy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Govp_2008stos_large.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Gov. Sarah Palin delivering her 2008 State of the State address]] At first, Palin supported the Gravina Island Bridge Project, otherwise known as the &amp;quot;Bridge to Nowhere&amp;quot;. In September 2006, during a stop in [[Ketchikan]] as part of her gubernatorial campaign, Palin stated, &amp;quot;OK, you've got Valley trash standing here in the middle of nowhere,&amp;quot; Palin said, according to an account in the Ketchikan Daily News. &amp;quot;I think we're going to make a good team as we progress that bridge project.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/sarahpalin/story/511471.html Palin touts stance on 'Bridge to Nowhere']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The $398 million bridge would have connected Ketchikan, on Revillagigedo Island in southern southeast Alaska, to its airport on nearby Gravina island. The Anchorage Daily News also quoted her in an October, 2006 article as saying yes, she would continue state funding for the bridge because she wanted swift action on infrastructure projects. &amp;quot;The window is now while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist,&amp;quot; she said.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080831/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_bridge_to_nowhere;_ylt=Am.NkRx1mLWk9A34FLhn8IADW7oF Critics: Palin used 'Bridge to Nowhere' for gain]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palin announced her opposition to the project in a 2007 press release.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She has stated her opposition arose because of the excessive amount of pork-barrel spending in the project, and that she would not fund the $329 million that was short for the budget.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/22/alaska.bridge.ap/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This reversal cost her the support of prominent Alaskan Republicans like Former state House Speaker Gail Phillips, who said, &amp;quot;You don't tell a group of Alaskans you support something and then go to someplace else and say you oppose it&amp;quot;. Palin instead said that the best option would be to upgrade the ferry system. However, the money that was retained from the earmark was not used for the ferry system, but was spent building a road on Gravina Island that links to the site of the canceled bridge.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bridge&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN3125537020080901 Palin &amp;quot;bridge to nowhere&amp;quot; line angers many Alaskans&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prominent Alaskan politicians criticized Palin for not &amp;quot;giving back&amp;quot; money earmarked for the project. These critics included her Republican campaign coordinator in Ketchikan, who stated that &amp;quot;She said 'thanks but no thanks,' but they kept the money&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bridge&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, state governments do not &amp;quot;give back&amp;quot; money in the manner proposed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three times during Palin's time as mayor, earmark funding for projects in Wasilla were noted in [[John McCain]]'s list of &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; spending in 2001 and 2002. McCain's list of spending approved without normal budget scrutiny identified a $500,000 earmark for a public transportation project in the city and a $1 million earmark for an emergency communications center while $450,000 was set aside for an agricultural processing facility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.latimes.com/news/la-na-earmarks3-2008sep03,0,6145252.story McCain had criticized earmarks from Palin]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palin, of course, as mayor of a small town had no ability to put these items in a Congressional bill, but her town did benefit from earmarked spending given to Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Foreign Policy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ftwainwright_govp_05s.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Governor Sarah Palin visits Strykers at Fort Wainwright, where she is briefed on how the troops are trained and what the training grounds provide.]] &lt;br /&gt;
Palin served as Commander in Chief of the Alaska Army [[National Guard]]. In 2007 she visited troops in [[Germany]] and [[Kuwait]]. According to Major General Craig E. Campbell, the adjutant general of the Alaska National Guard who commands the roughly 3,800 state militia members, the Alaskan governor is not in the site's chain of command and has no authority over its operations. He told the Associated Press on August 31st that he and Palin play no role in national defense activities, even when they involve the Alaska National Guard. He went on to state that the entire operation is under federal control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/08/31/ap/politics/main4401854.shtml GOP Cites Palin's Skill, But How Relevant Is It?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During her first major interview, with ABC's [[Charlie Gibson]], Gibson asked Palin if she agreed with the &amp;quot;[[Bush Doctrine]]&amp;quot;. Palin responded, &amp;quot;In what respect, Charlie?&amp;quot; Gibson followed, &amp;quot;What do you interpret it to be?&amp;quot; Palin answered with another question, &amp;quot;His world view?&amp;quot; Gibson still refused to answer directly but instead stated it was the doctrine Bush had proposed in September of 2002, before the Iraq war. Palin gave a response concerning Bush's attempt to eradicate Islamic extremism. Gibson then explained that the Bush doctrine refers to the right of anticipatory defense, a right to a [[Preemptive war|preemptive]] strike against any country that we think is going to attack us. What Gibson did not point out is that he himself once gave a definition of the &amp;quot;Bush doctrine&amp;quot; (a concept made up by the press that has no clear definition) that was similar to Palin's answer. Indeed it has been pointed out since that there are actually four different versions of what the Bush doctrine is and the term and meaning changes over time and place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/12/palins-definition-of-bush-doctrine-hits-the-gibson-mark/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Legislature Investigation===&lt;br /&gt;
On July 11th Palin's chief of Staff fired Commissioner of Public Safety Walt Monegan, she was heavily criticized for the action on the 12th in the state newspapers and on the 14th in the conservative talk radio media &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rick Rydell, Mike Porcaro, and Eddy Burke, as well as Shannyn Moore the liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and on the Blog of prominent Alaskan Republican Andrew Halcro on the 17th, because Walt Monegan was a very popular administrator. The outrage was 1.5 months before she was announced for VP. On the 11th of August of 2008, the [[Alaska]] state legislature began an investigation of Palin and her staff for potential abuse of power in regards to a firing of  Monegan, The vote to begin this action was held on July 28th, two weeks and two days after the firing. Legally, Palin could dismiss Monegan at any time as he serves at the pleasure of the governor. Monegan was dismissed from his position in July of 2008, which Palin's political opponents claim was due to Monegan's refusal to fire trooper Mike Wooten, Palin's former brother-in-law who had a history of complaints including tasering his 10 year old stepson.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pc&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.postchronicle.com/news/original/article_212168861.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palin says she released Monegan due to differences on budgeting. In an interview Monegan said that he was never told specifically by Sarah Palin to fire the state trooper Mike Wooten.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pc&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has denied the charges and, as is customary, the State of Alaska has hired a lawyer to represent her office in the investigation. August 25th, the Legislative Council voted 12-0 to hire Democratic state senator Hollis French as the investigator.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=59d_1220063478 Investigation into Governor Sarah Palin's abuse of powers] CBS 11, August 30, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 3-2 and the House Judiciary Committee voted 7-0. The State's attorney released this statement:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/cvn_palin_troopergate Palin hires attorney for Troopergate investigation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The governor of every state gets legal counsel and this attorney is part of a weeks-old effort to provide this governor defense in a series of outlandish politically motivated charges. This legal defense is neither new nor uncommon nor at all political. It is a matter of her job and is not recent and it is not related to her selection on the McCain-Palin ticket.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The McCain campaign came out with a picture that includes three lead state Democratic legislators investigating the Branchflower probe, known as ‘Troopergate'. The photo shows the three of them at [[Obama]] headquarters in Anchorage, Alaska in July. The photo did not include any of the Republicans also calling for investigation. The McCain campaign said the whole investigation is politically tainted and compromised. Republican Rep. John Coghill of North Pole called on managing investigator, legislator French to step down from the probe, saying he no longer had confidence in his objectivity. &amp;quot;These statements cause me to think that the report is already written even though the investigation is only just begun and the most important witnesses have not even been interviewed,” Coghill wrote in a letter calling for French’s replacement. “The investigation appears to be lacking in fairness, neutrality and due process.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2078644/posts McCain Camp has pictures of &amp;quot;troopergate&amp;quot; investigators at Obama Headquarters] FreeRepublic.com, September 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Democratic State Senator Kim Elton, head of the legislative council overseeing the investigation, said the decisions made by Sen. Hollis French &amp;quot;have been appropriate, bipartisan ... and unchallenged&amp;quot; and that French has called the comments he made last week &amp;quot;regrettable&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/08/palin.investigation/ Head of Palin trooper probe will stay, lawmaker says]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Lawyer Thomas Van Flein called the investigation &amp;quot;unlawful and unconstitutional&amp;quot; and said the man hired to run it, former prosecutor Stephen Branchflower, has a conflict of interest because he is a friend of the fired commissioner.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/troopergate/story/522488.html Palin's attorney calls investigator biased] Ap, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The investigation issued its report for the Alaska State Legislative Council on October 10, 2008, concluding that Monegan's refusal to fire the trooper was not the sole reason he was dismissed, but was likely a contributing factor. The author of the report, Stephen Branchflower, focused on two questions of the inquiry:  did Palin fire Walt Monegan improperly, and was the firing solely because of his refusal to fire her ex brother-in-law. &amp;quot;Governor Palin knowingly permitted a situation to continue where impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates in order to advance a personal agenda, to wit: to get Trooper Michael Wooten fired,&amp;quot; Branchflower wrote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE4998X420081011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Based on this, Branchflower claims that &amp;quot;I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/DOWNLOAD.pdf Page 8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In accordance with the second question the report focused on, Branchflower wrote, &amp;quot;I find that, although Walt Monegan's refusal to fire Trooper Michael Wooten was not the sole reason he was fired by Governor Sarah Palin, it was likely a contributing factor to his termination as Commissioner of Public Safety,&amp;quot; Branchflower wrote. The second finding of the report reads: &amp;quot;In spite of that, Governor Palin's firing of Commissioner Monegan was a proper and lawful exercise of her constitutional and statutory authority to hire and fire executive branch department heads.&amp;quot;  Branchflower also dismissed the Palins' assertions that they were afraid of Wooten because of threats they said he made. &amp;quot;Such claims of fear were not bona fide and were offered to provide cover for the Palins' real motivation: to get Trooper Wooten fired for personal family related reasons,&amp;quot; he wrote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_10692757?source=most_viewed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A preemptive response to this report was issued by the McCain/Palin campaign on October 9th, in which the campaign's own investigation concluded that Palin &amp;quot;acted within her proper and lawful authority in the reassignment of Walt Monegan&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE4998X420081011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end the &amp;quot;October Surprise&amp;quot; predicted by the head of the commission came to pass. Although the commission was asked not to release its findings until after the election to avoid political posturing, they refused to do so. Apart from tarring and feathering Palin, the report made no recommendations for any further inquiries or punishment, as it was understood that there was no case to do so. No direct reports of Sarah Palin abusing her power were ever produced or asking for the official to be fired were ever produced, but that didn't stop the report from drawing its conclusions based upon conjecture without evidence. Indeed, after the hoopla over the report subsided, the state personnel board released its finding that exonerated her of any wrongdoing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081104/ap_on_el_pr/palin_troopergate&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vice Presidential Candidate==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mccainpalin.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Sarah Palin vice presidential announcement, 08/29/08.]] On August 29, 2008, Palin was announced to be the Vice Presidential nominee for Republican Senator John McCain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/sarah_palin_vp/2008/08/29/126138.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The selection was a surprise, as those in the media were expecting [[Minnesota]] Governor [[Tim Pawlenty]] or former [[Massachusetts]]'s Governor [[Mitt Romney]]. Palin adds youth and executive experience to the ticket. She is the second female Vice Presidential candidate of a major party in U.S. history and the first one on a Republican ticket. The first was [[Geraldine Ferraro]], who the Democratic Party put on the ticket under [[Walter Mondale]] in 1984.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin's speech before the Republican convention on Wednesday, September 3rd was watched by over 40 million people. She had as many people turn in to see her as watched Obama's acceptance speech on the final day of the Democratic convention. Palin has also been attacked by the press on a level not seen since [[Dan Quayle]], although she ultimately handled it much better.&lt;br /&gt;
===Democrat Responses===&lt;br /&gt;
In a possible problem for the Democratic ticket, a majority of people believed that the press was trying to hurt Palin&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.yahoo.com/story/rasmussen/20080904/pl_rasmussen/palinmedia20080904;_ylt=AqErk__wZIKdoVvqUXdr44Nh24cA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and that type of unwarranted attack could have backfired into more support for the McCain/Palin ticket especially with unaffiliated voters believing the press is purposely attacking Palin by a 49% to 32% margin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Democrats had advised the Obama campaign to ignore Palin, fearing that emphasis on her inexperience will backfire against Obama himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/capital/2008/09/05/tips-for-obama-ignore-palin-dis-mccain  Matt Coopoer, &amp;quot;Tips for Obama: Ignore Palin, Dis McCain,&amp;quot; Sept. 5, 2008, ''Conde-Nast Portfoloio.com'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She participated in a debate with the Democratic VP candidate Joe Biden on October 2, 2008, ending up being declared the winner by most credible news sources that are not  influenced by liberal bias. Palin &amp;quot;kept Joe Biden on the defensive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;ended up dominating [the debate]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14234.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a campaign event in [[Virginia]], Barack Obama said of the McCain/Palin ticket's similar policies, &amp;quot;...You can put lipstick on a pig, it's still a pig.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94481288&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Given the fact that she's stated &amp;quot;The difference between a hockey mom and a pitbull (is) lipstick&amp;quot; and the fact that only a female candidate would wear lipstick, the McCain camp released a web ad implying that the comment was targeting Governor Palin. The ad featured video clips of Gov. Palin convention speech, Obama's remarks at the campaign event, and a clip of Katie Couric commenting on pervasive sexism in the campaign. After extensive discussion in the news media, the ad was removed from McCain's website and other video sites following a copyright claim by CBS news.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/CBS_takes_down_McCain_webad_suggests_its_misleading.html?showall]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In what prosecutors described as an attempt to derail the campaign, Palin's private email account was hacked by a liberal activist and son of a Democratic lawmaker who was charged with four felonies carrying a maximum of 50 years for criminal privacy rights violations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/18/palin_email_investigation_continues/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The offender, a self described Obama supporter, was convicted and sentenced to one year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin is a lightning rod to the established [[liberal]] women's movement. She, like many high profile conservative females, has taken much abuse from the left. Palin has been forced to set up a legal defense fund to help pay for fees related to an onslaught of ethic complaints, which are always frivolous.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/18738 Palin blasts Obama administration: Government wants to &amp;quot;control the people&amp;quot;] CNN&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Because she is retiring from being governor of Alaska, the anti-American liberals pat themselves on the back in glee. Liberals still fail to understand that she is ''the'' typical conservative that the majority of Americans identify with. Her principles and her outlook on Americanism is a model for all future leaders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin said of the people who have filed the complaints:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote| '''Those are the folks who want to tell me, they want to tell you, to sit down and shut up. We will not do that. I just can't, because I love my state. I love my country.''' }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Impact on Ticket===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the run-up to the Vice-Presidential debate on October 2, 2008, a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center attempted to measure the degree to which Palin impacted the GOP ticket positively or negatively in September.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://people-press.org/report/456/obama-regains-lead&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The survey compared the answers to two identical questions about her qualifications and overall favorable/unfavorable rating between polls taken in early and late September. The results show that public opinion of Palin has fallen significantly since the Republican convention, particularly in the public's opinion of her qualification to be Vice President. Faced with a barrage of negative press attacks after her nomination, some prominent Republicans like [[Mitt Romney]] believe that the isolation of Palin from the media in September was a mistake, and are calling for an increase in unscripted encounters with the press and public to counter that perception. According to Romney, &amp;quot;Holding Sarah Palin to just three interviews and microscopically focusing on each interview I think has been a mistake. I think they’d be a lot wiser to let Sarah Palin be Sarah Palin. Let her talk to the media, let her talk to people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2008/09/30/doubts-about-palin-grow-even-among-conservatives/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Exit polling from the election itself had the final say on the matter of her impact on the ticket. For those who considered her nomination on the ticket to be unimportant, 57% voted for Obama. For those who considered her nomination to be important, 53% voted for Obama, thereby showing a positive overall impact on the ticket. Considering that exit polling tilts Democratic, the actual impact may have been greater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When asked during an interview with liberal media pundit Katie Couric what newspapers and magazines Palin read (a classic [[Liberal trap]]), Palin fumbled and was unable to name any particular news source because of the side-swipe. This added fuel to charges that she was not qualified to run for Vice President, when in fact she was clearly qualified by her service as governor. Palin charges back at Couric and other liberal media attacks in her book [[Going Rogue]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Palin in 2012==&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has the support of a large, enthusiastic base on the right that is ready to work for her in Republican primaries. She has been coy about announcing plans for 2012, but she is well positioned for a presidential run, assuming she can raise the $50+ million required to campaign effectively. Given her personal charisma and Reagan-esque connection with average, conservative Americans, she may be able to pull off a resounding victory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.capitalcityweekly.com/stories/120308/new_363163237.shtml Sarah Palin hits Republican talking points while stumping in Georgia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==SarahPAC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 27, 2009 Palin formed the political action committee (PAC) SarahPAC. The organization supports &amp;quot;energy independence and reform&amp;quot; and will endorse candidates who &amp;quot;share Governor Palin’s ideas and goals.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;amp;sid=azCCxotgdG1E&amp;amp;refer=home&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palin.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Palin believes in [[Real America]] and has referred to it often in her speeches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin filled out a policy questionnaire for the Eagle Forum Alaska during her 2006 gubernatorial race. One question asked, &amp;quot;Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?&amp;quot;  Palin responded, &amp;quot;Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.&amp;quot;  Yet [[public schools]] still resist teaching abstinence and instead promote sexual behavior by teenagers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another question asked, &amp;quot;Are you offended by the phrase 'Under God' in the [[Pledge of Allegiance]]? Why or why not?&amp;quot;  Palin replied, &amp;quot;Not on your life. '''If it was good enough for the Founding Fathers''', it's good enough for me and I'll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many liberals ignorant of the history of &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; have tried to ridicule Palin's remark, even calling her an &amp;quot;idiot&amp;quot; for it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2008/sep/01/week&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892, and George Washington's phrase &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; was added to it in June 1954.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In fact, the origin of the phrase &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; is the General Orders of [[George Washington]] on July 2 and 9, 1776: &amp;quot;The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and conduct of this army&amp;quot; (July 2); &amp;quot;the peace and safety of the Country now depends, under God, solely on the success of our arms&amp;quot; (July 9).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/264xqezm.asp?pg=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; George Washington was indeed a [[Founding Father]], and the Founding Fathers made no secret of their Christian faith and unfailing belief in God in the [[Declaration of Independence]] and later writings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin also believes that students need to learn of the controversy surrounding the [[Theory of evolution|Theory of evolution]], and that discussing Creationism should not be banned from schools. During the 2006 campaign for the Alaskan Governorship, Palin was answering a question from the moderator near the conclusion of Wednesday night's televised debate on KAKM Channel 7 when she said, &amp;quot;Teach both. You know, don't be afraid of information. Healthy debate is so important, and it's so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dwb.adn.com/news/politics/elections/story/8347904p-8243554c.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She later clarified her position by stating &amp;quot;I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum.&amp;quot;  She added that, if elected, she would not push the state Board of Education to add such creation-based alternatives to the state's required curriculum. As of September 2008 she has kept that pledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an example of liberal mockery, the [[Huffington Post]] attempted to make light of Sarah Palin's creationist beliefs, highlighting the creationism belief that [[dinosaur|dinosaurs]] and man coexisted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/28/palin-claimed-dinosaurs-a_n_130012.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Saturday Night Live]] likewise did a skit in which they had her refer to the Museum of Natural History as &amp;quot;that evolution museum&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Church Life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sarah Palin was baptized as a [[Roman Catholic]] and, at age 12, she was rebaptized in the Wasilla Assembly of God church.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web&lt;br /&gt;
|accessdate=2008-08-30&lt;br /&gt;
|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-mccainveepbio30-2008aug30,0,2159346.story&lt;br /&gt;
|title=Palin has risen quickly from PTA to VP pick&lt;br /&gt;
|author=Decker, Cathleen and Michael Finnegan,&lt;br /&gt;
|work=Los Angeles Times&lt;br /&gt;
|date=August 30, 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news&lt;br /&gt;
| last = Gorsk| first = Eric&lt;br /&gt;
| url = http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g4-w_DCWffagBaQb8Il9a0R2hkPAD92SL7E00&lt;br /&gt;
| title = Evangelicals energized by McCain-Palin ticket&lt;br /&gt;
| publisher =Associated Press&lt;br /&gt;
| date = 2008-08-30&lt;br /&gt;
| accessdate = 2008-08-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin attends the Wasilla Bible Church&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |first=David |last=Pepper |title=Regarding Governor Palin: A Letter from Pastor David Pepper |url=http://churchontherockak.org/Regarding-Sarah-Palin.html |publisher=Church on the Rock |accessdate=2008-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, an independent congregation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://www.wasillabible.org/faq.htm |title=Wasilla Bible Church FAQ |accessdate=2008-09-05 |work= |publisher= |date= }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;miller&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lisa Miller and Amanda Coyne. &amp;quot;[http://www.newsweek.com/id/156679 A Visit to Palin's Church: Scripture and discretion on the program in Wasilla].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''. Sept. 2, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when at home and attended the Juneau Christian Center when in Juneau as governor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |title=Statement Concerning Sarah Palin |url=http://www.jccalaska.com/images/10000/3000/582JU/user/palin.htm |publisher=Juneau Christian Center |date=2008-09-03 |accessdate=2008-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
Palin earned the highest TV ratings at the Republican convention when she spoke, even surpassing McCain's acceptance speech, and nearly matched Obama's acceptance speech&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/palin-triggers-rnc-ratings-spike/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, gaining unprecedented attention. Likewise her Vice Presidential debate with [[Joe Biden]] had more viewers than any of the three debates between McCain and Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14201.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also, her brief appearance on Saturday Night Live in October 2008 gave the show its highest ratings in 14 years, and was actually the third highest ranked show for the week based on the number of people who tuned in originally to watch her, 17 million, even though it ran at midnight in the East Coast Market.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/oct/20/ustelevision-tvratings&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sarah Palin's Alaska''' her reality show on The Learning Channel (TLC) drew about 2.5 million viewers on premier Sunday night, dominating its time slot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/12/25/sunday-1219-cable-ratings-sarah-palins-alaska-top-gear-ax-men-leverage-kendra-real-housewives-more/76555&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and breaking TLC records with 5 million viewers having tuned in to watch the first episode.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/15/sarah-palins-alaska-ratings-tlc_n_783740.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Publications==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Palin Book2.jpg|right|125px]]&lt;br /&gt;
* '''''&amp;quot;America by Heart; Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag&amp;quot;''''', Harper-Collins, November 2010.  &amp;quot;Palin delivers an intimate and personal look at the woman behind the public servant. In her #1 New York Times bestselling memoir Going Rogue—the bestselling nonfiction book of 2009—Palin gave readers a look at her upbringing, her dynamic career, and her candidacy next to John McCain for the Vice Presidency of the United States. In this inspirational follow-up, her reflections on faith, family, and patriotism will read like a bible of American virtues for anyone hoping to understand the truths that lie at the heart of the nation.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.harpercollins.com/books/America-Heart-Sarah-Palin/?isbn=9780062010964?AA=index_authorIntro_36341 America by Heart; Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag - Harper Collins Website]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''''[[Going Rogue: An American Life]]''''', [[Memoir]], published by Harper-Collins:(November 2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2009/10/01/amazing-palin%E2%80%99s-book-number-one-on-both-amazon-and-barnes-unprecedented/ Amazing: Palin’s book number one on both Amazon and Barnes &amp;amp; Noble bestseller list, Audacity of Hypocrisy, October 1, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rush Limbaugh. [http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111709/content/01125120.guest.html Rush Interviews Governor Sarah Palin], ''RushLimbaugh.com'', November 17, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Robert Shaffer. [http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/17/ap-turns-heads-devoting-reporters-palin-book-fact-check/ AP Turns Heads for Devoting 11 Reporters to Palin Book 'Fact Check'], ''FOXNews.com'', November 17, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Palin has decided that her book royalties will be donated to families of Ft. Hood victims. ''&amp;quot;I'm joining the efforts of many others by donating my royalties from the book sales during our stop at Fort Hood to the families of the victims whose lives have been forever changed by the tragic events.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{conservatism}}&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gov.state.ak.us/ State of Alaska - Governor Sarah Palin Official Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nga.org/portal/site/nga/menuitem.29fab9fb4add37305ddcbeeb501010a0/?vgnextoid=864bb9006da3f010VgnVCM1000001a01010aRCRD National Governor's Association - Alaska Governor Sarah Palin]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://votesmart.org/bio.php?can_id=27200 Project Vote Smart - Governor Sarah H. Palin]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/Sarah_Palin.htm Sarah Palin On the issues]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://parentingfreedom.com/2008/09/03/sarah-palin-mother-and-first-female-vice-president-pictures-children-parenting/ Sarah Palin: Mother and First Female Vice President], ''Parenting Freedom'', September 03, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://churchformen.blogspot.com/2008/09/people-around-world-are-asking-who-is.html Sarah Palin, a friend of mine]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDE3MmE5MDVmMGM1YjQ2NmVhMjJkN2I2ZTcxMzhlNjU=&amp;amp;w=MA== I Still Hate You, Sarah Palin] National Review Online&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/256099/i-hate-you-bristol-palin-david-kahane?page=1 I Hate You, Bristol Palin] National Review Online&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Palin, Sarah}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alaska Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Mayors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tea Party Movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lisa_Murkowski&amp;diff=847928</id>
		<title>Lisa Murkowski</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lisa_Murkowski&amp;diff=847928"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T04:08:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* 2010 Midterm Elections */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Lisa Murkowski&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Lisa-murkowski.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Verne Martell&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=Roman Catholic&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Alaska&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=December 20, 2002 - Present&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Frank Murkowski]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Lisa Ann Murkowski''', born May 22, 1957 (age {{age|1957|5|22}}), is the senior [[United States]] [[U.S. Senator| Senator]] from [[Alaska]] and a member of the [[Republican Party]]. She is Alaska's first female senator and the first U.S. Senator born in Alaska. In 1998, Murkowski was elected to the Alaska [[House of Representatives]] and had been elected the House Majority Leader for the 2003–2004 session. In December of 2002, her father, Governor [[Frank Murkowski]], appointed her to a vacant seat in the United States Senate, resulting in charges of nepotism. In her 2004 reelection she was considered the [[Democrat|Democrats]] best chance to pick up a seat from an incumbent Republican. Murkowski was elected to a full six year term by a 49%-46% margin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2010 Midterm Elections==&lt;br /&gt;
In a stunning upset, she was defeated for renomination in 2010 by Tea Party favorite and pro-life conservative[[Joe Miller]]. Murkowski ran a write in candidacy, which was especially complicated due to the high rate of non-english speakers who supported her. Approximately 8,000 of the 100,000 write in votes cast for her were misspelled, the most common misspelling was Merkowski, but Murkowsky and Murcowski were also common. For comparison the last major write in candidate, Robin Taylor, who was the Republican party nominee running against a withdrawn candidate and a [[Democrat]] had about 15% misspellings, Robin Taylor is far easier to spell than Lisa Murkowski. The wording of the legislation leads readers to the conclusion that no misspelling is acceptable, even with out misspellings Murkowski won, but the Division of Elections and State and Federal courts choose to take voter intent into account and concluded that all votes that where phonetically identical to Murkowski should be counted for her. The legislation was rewritten early in the 2011 legislative session with bipartisan support in order to avoid repeat problems in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political views==&lt;br /&gt;
Lisa Murkowski supports oil exploration in her home state of Alaska, saying that recent technological developments have reduced the environmental risks of drilling in ANWR. Murkowski has a reputation as a &amp;quot;[[moderate Republican]]&amp;quot; (i.e. liberal); she is a [[RINO]] by definition, Republican-in-name-only, according to [[Rush Limbaugh]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Rush Limbaugh]].[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111710/content/01125110.guest.html Lisa Murkowksi, RINO Run Wild], RushLimbaugh.com, November 17, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Murkowski has said this of the [[Obama administration]] and [[President Obama]] in particular: &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I will tell you, I am not one of those who wants Obama to fail.  If he does well that means the country is doing well.  We don't have time as a nation to spend all of what we do blocking.  We have got to figure out how we get to a point where we can be sitting around a table and talking about these difficult problems and advancing some solutions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Rush Limbaugh]]. [http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/content/home/daily/site_111610/content/01125107.guest.html Lisa Murkowski is an Idiot], RushLimbaugh.com, November 16, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
Lisa Murkowski received a 14% rating from [[NARAL Pro-Choice America]], indicating a pro-life voting record although she describes herself as &amp;quot;[[pro-choice]].&amp;quot; She is also a member of several abortion rights groups such as The Republican Majority For Choice, Republicans For Choice and The Wish List. Murkowski voted to ban [[partial birth abortion]] and to make it a criminal penalty for harming an unborn fetus during other crimes. Murkowski likewise is a strong advocate of taxpayer-funded human embryo experimentation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Murkowski is one of ten Republican Senators who refused to commit to Senate Majority Leader [[Bill Frist]]'s &amp;quot;nuclear option&amp;quot; to end judicial filibusters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2009, Murkowski authored legislation that would ban the [[Environmental Protection Agency]] from regulating carbon dioxide, which is opposed by the [[Obama administration]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27509.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://murkowski.senate.gov/ Official Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Lisa_Murkowski.htm On the Issues]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/m001153/ Voting Record]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opencongress.org/people/show/300075_lisa_murkowski OpenCongress]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Murkowski, Lisa Ann}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: 110th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:111th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alaska]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&amp;diff=847926</id>
		<title>Sarah Palin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&amp;diff=847926"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T04:02:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* Legislature Investigation */  Didn't see any objections&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Sarah Palin&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Sarah Palin.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Todd Palin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=Christian&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
        |number=11th&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Alaska&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=December 4, 2006 - July 26, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Frank Murkowski]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Sean Parnell]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/mayor&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=&lt;br /&gt;
	|city=Wasilla, Alaska&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=1996–2002&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=John Stein&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=Diane Keller&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sarah Louise Heath Palin''' (pronounced pay'-lynn) (born February 11, 1964) is a [[conservative]] [[Republican Party|Republican]] who served as the 11th [[Governor]] of [[Alaska]] from 2006 through 2009. She is the youngest person to hold this office as well as the first woman to do so in the state's history. On July 3, 2009 Palin announced that she would resign as Governor of Alaska.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/palin_not_running/2009/07/03/231789.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Executive power was transferred to [[Lieutenant Governor]] [[Sean Parnell]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin came to national attention as Senator [[John McCain]]'s Vice Presidential running mate in the [[2008 Presidential Election]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/08/palins_vp_selection_speech.html Acceptance Speech by Palin]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. She was the first woman to appear on a Republican Presidential ticket. She brought a [[populism|populist]] image and a record of cutting wasteful spending and reforming government to McCain's ticket. In the summer of 2007, she was the most popular governor in America, having cut 13% of [[Alaska]]'s budget.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/851orcjq.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She is strongly [[pro-life]] and a prominent spokesperson for [[special needs]] children. In an appearance on August 30, 2008 in Washington, Pennsylvania, she was greeted by a surprisingly large crowd as she promoted the new McCain-Palin ticket. She favors more competition in health care and pushed for abolishing the [[certificate of need]] regulations that interfere with opening new medical clinics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/04/AR2008090403253.html?referrer=emailarticle&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin and her husband [[Todd Palin|Todd]] have been married for 20 years. Todd was a member of the United Steelworkers Union, and their eldest son (of five children) is in the [[United States Army]], having served in [[Iraq]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Her memoir ''[[Going Rogue]]'' was published in November 2009, with Palin drawing large crowds to book signing occasions around the country. She comments regularly on public affairs via her Facebook page, criticizing the &amp;quot;death panels&amp;quot; of the health care reform program and praising President Obama's pro-war speech upon his receiving the [[Nobel]] Peace prize in December 2009. She appears regularly on [[Fox News Channel].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/11/sarah-palin-to-contribute-to-fox-news/?scp=2&amp;amp;sq=Palin&amp;amp;st=cse&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Personal Background==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sarah Palin Todd Trig.jpg|thumb|right|250px|In this April 23, 2008 file photo, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, left, and her husband, Todd Palin, hold their baby boy Trig in Anchorage, Alaska.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Photo courtesy of Newsmax.com'']]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin arrived in Alaska with her family in 1964, when her parents came to teach school in Skagway. Palin attended Wasilla High School where her extracurricular activities included captaining the basketball team  which went on to win the state championship.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama Can't Win Against Palin] Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After graduating in 1982, she went on to college, attending several institutions before she received a bachelor of science degree in communications-journalism from the [[University of Idaho]] in 1987. To earn money for college, Palin entered beauty pageants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She worked in the media and the utility industry before beginning her career in public service 14 years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the course of her 44 years in Alaska she has lived in Skagway, Eagle River and Wasilla. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She is married to [[Todd Palin]], part Yupik [[Eskimo]], who is a lifelong Alaskan. Todd formerly worked at a non-management union job in the oil industry, and also as a commercial salmon fisherman. He is a four-time champion of the Iron Dog, the world's longest snowmobile race. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Todd and Sarah have five children together: Track, Bristol, Willow, Piper, and Trig. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sarah Palin is a [[Labor union|union]] member, a [[moose]] hunter and holds a membership in the [[NRA]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/29/mccain-to-name-running-mate-on-friday/ McCain Names Alaska Gov. Palin as Running Mate] Fox News, August 29, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has been widely praised among conservatives for acting on her [[pro-life]] beliefs in the case of her youngest son, Trig, who was diagnosed with [[Down syndrome]] in the fourth month of her pregnancy. After researching the condition, she and her husband agreed to continue to pregnancy:&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;[My husband Todd said,] we shouldn't be asking 'Why us?' We should be saying 'Well, why not us?' We've both been very vocal about being pro life. We understand that every innocent life has wonderful potential. I'm looking at him right now, and I see perfection. Yeah, he has an extra chromosome. I keep thinking, in our world, what is normal and what is perfect?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.celebrity-babies.com/2008/05/gov-sarah-palin.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=29242 Canadian Doctors 'Fear' Sarah Palin's Choice May Start a Trend] Catholic Online, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trig was born on April 18, 2008, four months before his mother was announced as the vice-presidential candidate. Palin wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;This new person in your life can help everyone put things in perspective and bind us together, and get everyone focused on what really matters ... Those who love him will think less about self and focus less on what the world tells [us] is 'normal' or 'perfect.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;people&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[People magazine]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;It's a sign of the times to be able to do this,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;I can think of so many male candidates who watched a families grow while they were in office. There is no reason to believe a woman can't do it with a growing family. My baby will not be at all or in any sense neglected.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alaska governor balances newborn's needs, official duties [http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-05-10-4082128881_x.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin's older son, Track, serves in the U.S. Army, and was deployed to [[Iraq War|Iraq]] in September 2008. Palin says, &amp;quot;I'm proud of him but I worry.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2008, Palin announced that her daughter Bristol was five months pregnant. After having been given the choice, Bristol bravely chose to keep the child. Palin stated &amp;quot;We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080901/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_palin_daughter Palin says 17-year-old daughter is pregnant]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bristol has since gone on to promote abstinence as a realistic choice for teenagers, stating, &amp;quot;[A]bstinence is the only way you can effectively, 100% foolproof way you can prevent pregnancy.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/nat5025.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  On July 14, 2010 Bristol Palin announced that she and Levi Johnston had become re-engaged and wanted to be married as soon as possible. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://content.usatoday.com/communities/entertainment/post/2010/07/bristol-palin-levi-johnston-are-engaged/1 USA Today; Bristol Palin, Levi Johnston are engaged. Jul 14, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Two weeks later Bristol said the reconciliation was over. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20407608,00.html People Magazine interview; August 3, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palin Family..jpg|thumb|left|Palin family members at the announcement of Palin's vice presidential selection, August 29, 2008. From left: Todd, Piper, Willow, Bristol, and Trig.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political Career==&lt;br /&gt;
Palin was elected to two terms on the Wasilla City Council, and then two terms as the Mayor / Manager of Alaska's fastest growing community (Population: 5400 in 2000)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wasilla.areaconnect.com/statistics.htm Wasilla Population and Demographics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. During her time as mayor, Palin hired a Washington lobbying firm to help secure $8 million in congressionally directed spending projects, otherwise known as earmarks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-08-31-palin-bridge_N.htm Palin backed 'bridge to nowhere' in 2006]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ms. Palin's leadership qualities were recognized when she was elected as President of the Alaska Conference of Mayors. In 2002, she ran for Lieutenant Governor, but came in second in a four-way race. Later that year, when [[Frank Murkowski]] resigned his [[Senate]] seat to become [[governor]], she interviewed for the opening. Instead, Murkowski appointed his daughter to the seat. From there, she went on to run for governor and won, becoming the first female governor of Alaska and its youngest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003, then-Governor Mukowski appointed Palin to serve as Panel Ethics Commissioner of Alaska's Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, which regulates Alaska's [[non-renewable energy|non-renewable]] resources: [[oil]] and [[gasoline|gas]]. She resigned in 2004 as a protest over the &amp;quot;lack of ethics&amp;quot; of fellow panelists who had ignored her complaints of legal violations and conflicts of interest. In a similar vein, Palin took a great political risk by revealing that Randy Reudrich, chairman of the state Republican party, was doing political business on state time. She did this to fulfil a [[conflict of interest]] statement that required her to report such things; to omit the revelation would have been dishonest. But it turned out that this action endeared her to the people of Alaska.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://churchformen.blogspot.com/2008/09/people-around-world-are-asking-who-is.html Sarah Palin, a friend of mine]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To help cultivate influence and political clout in the state, Palin served from 2003 - June, 2005 as one of three directors of the &amp;quot;Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc.&amp;quot;, a 527 group that raised funds from corporate donors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/01/palin_was_a_director_of_embatt.html#more Palin Was a Director of Embattled Sen. Ted Stevens's 527 Group]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The stated purpose of the group is, &amp;quot;To increase the number of Republican women in elected offices and in appointed governmental and political positions, including advisory and regulatory commissions through training and education.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/527/ted_stevens_excellence_in_public_service_inc.asp Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She ran for Governor in 2006 on a clean government platform, and accomplished a political rarity in defeating the incumbent Governor [[Frank Murkowski]] in his own Republican primary. Palin went on to defeat former Governor [[Tony Knowles]] in the general election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She has also served on the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission. She was named one of Alaska's &amp;quot;Top 40 Under 40&amp;quot;, Alaska's Public Works &amp;quot;Person of the Year&amp;quot;, and was recently inducted into the Sigma Beta Delta Honor Society at Alaska Pacific University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has served on numerous boards and commissions throughout the State, and stays active as a marathon runner, sports team mom, hockey manager and school volunteer. A lifetime member of the [[NRA]], she enjoys hunting, fishing and Alaska history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gov.state.ak.us/bio.php Alaska Governor Sarah Palin&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Resignation===&lt;br /&gt;
In July of 2009, Governor Palin held a national press conference to announce that she would resign her office effective July 26, 2009. She explained:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|My choice is to take a stand and effect change – not hit our heads against the wall and watch valuable state time and money, millions of your dollars, go down the drain in this new environment. Rather, we know we can effect positive change outside government at this moment in time, on another scale, and actually make a difference for our priorities – and so we will, for Alaskans and for Americans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gov.state.ak.us/exec-column.php  Executive Column: Palin's resignation announcement]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since, she has faced constant [[liberal]] criticism over her decision not to complete her term of office and for pursuing media and financial opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Record as Governor==&lt;br /&gt;
===Energy and Oil===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin spoke a great deal about harnessing [[oil]] and natural [[gas]] resources, Palin presented the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act (AGIA) in March 2007, which was intended to lead to the construction of a gasline. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsminer.com/news/2008/aug/29/palin-alaska-gasline-inducement-act-nears-completi/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It received bipartisan support and was signed into law by Governor Palin in June. In August of 2008 she signed legislation giving state authority to award TransCanada Corp a license to build and operate a multibillion-dollar pipeline to ship natural gas from the North Slope. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=2e84b1e8-9a4a-4558-ad05-21b517c50fae&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; While this was intended to improve Alaska's economy it became merely a vehicle to pay $37 million to Transcanada with potential libailities for the state of up to half a billion dollars &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adn.com/2011/01/20/1659129/lawmakers-express-frustration.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; all for a pipeline that will not be able to make money for 20 years based on natural gas forecasts &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adn.com/2010/12/22/1616472/report-leaves-pipeline-out-of.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Alaska's law makers are currently looking for ways to exit the Palin plan for a gas line. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adn.com/2011/02/04/1684449/alaska-lawmakers-propose-ditching.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As Governor, Palin created a new subcabinet that develops policies to reduce greenhouse gases and help the state adapt to [[climate change]]. She supports oil production in ANWR, connecting it with national security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GE11URmmnc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007 the housing bubble burst, which did not significantly affect Alaska. It did soften the dollar, which raised the dollar price of oil in the global market with out raising the costs of production, this lead to windfall profits. Over the objections of oil companies, Palin worked with the [[Democrats]] on the Alaska state legislature to approve a major increase in taxes on the oil industry.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008103325_alaskatax07.html Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Alaska's Clear and Equitable Share&amp;quot; (ACES, Lapooned by the conservative talk radio media as Alaskans Clearly Entering Socialism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rick Rydell Radio Program, 650KENI.com, 2/8/2011, 8:43 AM Alaska Standard Time&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.) The state then gave Alaskans a $1200 check to pay for increased gas prices, using the increased revenues from the tax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/palin-backed-alaskan-windfall-profits-tax/ Palin backed Alaskan windfalls-profit tax]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin also announced on May 21, 2008 that the state would challenge a recent listing of [[polar bears]] as a threatened species as she and other Alaska elected officials feared such a listing would cripple oil and gas development in prime polar bear habitat off the state's northern and northwestern coasts. Palin's belief is that there is not enough evidence to support a listing, asserting that polar bears are well-managed and their population has dramatically increased over 30 years as a result of conservation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As governor of Alaska in Jan. 2009, Palin announced support for [[Alternative energy]] programs as she proposed a statewide energy plan that called for 50% of Alaska's power to be generated by renewable resources by 2025.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Dan Joling, &amp;quot;Palin unveils state energy goals,&amp;quot; [http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story/657216.html ''Anchorage Daily News'' Jan. 16, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Reaction to Gulf of Mexico oil spill====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has pointed out how environmentalists are responsible for locking up safer drilling areas on dry land, effectively forcing offshore drilling to become the preferred mode of acquiring oil, thus inviting crisis like the [[Gulf of Mexico oil spill]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.nysun.com/editorials/sarah-palins-way-of-thinking/86988/|work=[[The New York Sun]]|format=HTML|title=Sarah Palin’s Way of Thinking|date=June 5th 2010|language=English|quote=Governor Palin’s point will, we predict, become only more logical in the face of the disaster of the Deepwater Horizon. And she will increasingly come to be seen as having a clear way of thinking. She thinks like an economist. She understands that policies have consequences. If one wants, as the environmentalists have been doing for a decade, to restrict onshore drilling, it is going to incent offshore drilling.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===State Economy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Govp_2008stos_large.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Gov. Sarah Palin delivering her 2008 State of the State address]] At first, Palin supported the Gravina Island Bridge Project, otherwise known as the &amp;quot;Bridge to Nowhere&amp;quot;. In September 2006, during a stop in [[Ketchikan]] as part of her gubernatorial campaign, Palin stated, &amp;quot;OK, you've got Valley trash standing here in the middle of nowhere,&amp;quot; Palin said, according to an account in the Ketchikan Daily News. &amp;quot;I think we're going to make a good team as we progress that bridge project.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/sarahpalin/story/511471.html Palin touts stance on 'Bridge to Nowhere']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The $398 million bridge would have connected Ketchikan, on Revillagigedo Island in southern southeast Alaska, to its airport on nearby Gravina island. The Anchorage Daily News also quoted her in an October, 2006 article as saying yes, she would continue state funding for the bridge because she wanted swift action on infrastructure projects. &amp;quot;The window is now while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist,&amp;quot; she said.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080831/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_bridge_to_nowhere;_ylt=Am.NkRx1mLWk9A34FLhn8IADW7oF Critics: Palin used 'Bridge to Nowhere' for gain]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palin announced her opposition to the project in a 2007 press release.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She has stated her opposition arose because of the excessive amount of pork-barrel spending in the project, and that she would not fund the $329 million that was short for the budget.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/22/alaska.bridge.ap/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This reversal cost her the support of prominent Alaskan Republicans like Former state House Speaker Gail Phillips, who said, &amp;quot;You don't tell a group of Alaskans you support something and then go to someplace else and say you oppose it&amp;quot;. Palin instead said that the best option would be to upgrade the ferry system. However, the money that was retained from the earmark was not used for the ferry system, but was spent building a road on Gravina Island that links to the site of the canceled bridge.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bridge&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN3125537020080901 Palin &amp;quot;bridge to nowhere&amp;quot; line angers many Alaskans&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prominent Alaskan politicians criticized Palin for not &amp;quot;giving back&amp;quot; money earmarked for the project. These critics included her Republican campaign coordinator in Ketchikan, who stated that &amp;quot;She said 'thanks but no thanks,' but they kept the money&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bridge&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, state governments do not &amp;quot;give back&amp;quot; money in the manner proposed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three times during Palin's time as mayor, earmark funding for projects in Wasilla were noted in [[John McCain]]'s list of &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; spending in 2001 and 2002. McCain's list of spending approved without normal budget scrutiny identified a $500,000 earmark for a public transportation project in the city and a $1 million earmark for an emergency communications center while $450,000 was set aside for an agricultural processing facility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.latimes.com/news/la-na-earmarks3-2008sep03,0,6145252.story McCain had criticized earmarks from Palin]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palin, of course, as mayor of a small town had no ability to put these items in a Congressional bill, but her town did benefit from earmarked spending given to Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Foreign Policy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ftwainwright_govp_05s.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Governor Sarah Palin visits Strykers at Fort Wainwright, where she is briefed on how the troops are trained and what the training grounds provide.]] &lt;br /&gt;
Palin served as Commander in Chief of the Alaska Army [[National Guard]]. In 2007 she visited troops in [[Germany]] and [[Kuwait]]. According to Major General Craig E. Campbell, the adjutant general of the Alaska National Guard who commands the roughly 3,800 state militia members, the Alaskan governor is not in the site's chain of command and has no authority over its operations. He told the Associated Press on August 31st that he and Palin play no role in national defense activities, even when they involve the Alaska National Guard. He went on to state that the entire operation is under federal control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/08/31/ap/politics/main4401854.shtml GOP Cites Palin's Skill, But How Relevant Is It?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During her first major interview, with ABC's [[Charlie Gibson]], Gibson asked Palin if she agreed with the &amp;quot;[[Bush Doctrine]]&amp;quot;. Palin responded, &amp;quot;In what respect, Charlie?&amp;quot; Gibson followed, &amp;quot;What do you interpret it to be?&amp;quot; Palin answered with another question, &amp;quot;His world view?&amp;quot; Gibson still refused to answer directly but instead stated it was the doctrine Bush had proposed in September of 2002, before the Iraq war. Palin gave a response concerning Bush's attempt to eradicate Islamic extremism. Gibson then explained that the Bush doctrine refers to the right of anticipatory defense, a right to a [[Preemptive war|preemptive]] strike against any country that we think is going to attack us. What Gibson did not point out is that he himself once gave a definition of the &amp;quot;Bush doctrine&amp;quot; (a concept made up by the press that has no clear definition) that was similar to Palin's answer. Indeed it has been pointed out since that there are actually four different versions of what the Bush doctrine is and the term and meaning changes over time and place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/12/palins-definition-of-bush-doctrine-hits-the-gibson-mark/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Legislature Investigation===&lt;br /&gt;
On July 11th Palin's chief of Staff fired Commissioner of Public Safety Walt Monegan, she was heavily criticized for the action on the 12th in the state newspapers and on the 14th in the conservative talk radio media &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rick Rydell, Mike Porcaro, and Eddy Burke, as well as Shannyn Moore the liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and on the Blog of prominent Alaskan Republican Andrew Halcro on the 17th, because Walt Monegan was a very popular administrator. The outrage was 1.5 months before she was announced for VP. On the 11th of August of 2008, the [[Alaska]] state legislature began an investigation of Palin and her staff for potential abuse of power in regards to a firing of  Monegan, The vote to begin this action was held on July 28th, two weeks and two days after the firing. Legally, Palin could dismiss Monegan at any time as he serves at the pleasure of the governor. Monegan was dismissed from his position in July of 2008, which Palin's political opponents claim was due to Monegan's refusal to fire trooper Mike Wooten, Palin's former brother-in-law who had a history of complaints including tasering his 10 year old stepson.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pc&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.postchronicle.com/news/original/article_212168861.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palin says she released Monegan due to differences on budgeting. In an interview Monegan said that he was never told specifically by Sarah Palin to fire the state trooper Mike Wooten.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pc&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has denied the charges and, as is customary, the State of Alaska has hired a lawyer to represent her office in the investigation. August 25th, the Legislative Council voted 12-0 to hire Democratic state senator Hollis French as the investigator.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=59d_1220063478 Investigation into Governor Sarah Palin's abuse of powers] CBS 11, August 30, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 3-2 and the House Judiciary Committee voted 7-0. The State's attorney released this statement:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/cvn_palin_troopergate Palin hires attorney for Troopergate investigation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The governor of every state gets legal counsel and this attorney is part of a weeks-old effort to provide this governor defense in a series of outlandish politically motivated charges. This legal defense is neither new nor uncommon nor at all political. It is a matter of her job and is not recent and it is not related to her selection on the McCain-Palin ticket.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The McCain campaign came out with a picture that includes three lead state Democratic legislators investigating the Branchflower probe, known as ‘Troopergate'. The photo shows the three of them at [[Obama]] headquarters in Anchorage, Alaska in July. The photo did not include any of the Republicans also calling for investigation. The McCain campaign said the whole investigation is politically tainted and compromised. Republican Rep. John Coghill of North Pole called on managing investigator, legislator French to step down from the probe, saying he no longer had confidence in his objectivity. &amp;quot;These statements cause me to think that the report is already written even though the investigation is only just begun and the most important witnesses have not even been interviewed,” Coghill wrote in a letter calling for French’s replacement. “The investigation appears to be lacking in fairness, neutrality and due process.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2078644/posts McCain Camp has pictures of &amp;quot;troopergate&amp;quot; investigators at Obama Headquarters] FreeRepublic.com, September 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Democratic State Senator Kim Elton, head of the legislative council overseeing the investigation, said the decisions made by Sen. Hollis French &amp;quot;have been appropriate, bipartisan ... and unchallenged&amp;quot; and that French has called the comments he made last week &amp;quot;regrettable&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/08/palin.investigation/ Head of Palin trooper probe will stay, lawmaker says]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Lawyer Thomas Van Flein called the investigation &amp;quot;unlawful and unconstitutional&amp;quot; and said the man hired to run it, former prosecutor Stephen Branchflower, has a conflict of interest because he is a friend of the fired commissioner.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/troopergate/story/522488.html Palin's attorney calls investigator biased] Ap, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The investigation issued its report for the Alaska State Legislative Council on October 10, 2008, concluding that Monegan's refusal to fire the trooper was not the sole reason he was dismissed, but was likely a contributing factor. The author of the report, Stephen Branchflower, focused on two questions of the inquiry:  did Palin fire Walt Monegan improperly, and was the firing solely because of his refusal to fire her ex brother-in-law. &amp;quot;Governor Palin knowingly permitted a situation to continue where impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates in order to advance a personal agenda, to wit: to get Trooper Michael Wooten fired,&amp;quot; Branchflower wrote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE4998X420081011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Based on this, Branchflower claims that &amp;quot;I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/DOWNLOAD.pdf Page 8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In accordance with the second question the report focused on, Branchflower wrote, &amp;quot;I find that, although Walt Monegan's refusal to fire Trooper Michael Wooten was not the sole reason he was fired by Governor Sarah Palin, it was likely a contributing factor to his termination as Commissioner of Public Safety,&amp;quot; Branchflower wrote. The second finding of the report reads: &amp;quot;In spite of that, Governor Palin's firing of Commissioner Monegan was a proper and lawful exercise of her constitutional and statutory authority to hire and fire executive branch department heads.&amp;quot;  Branchflower also dismissed the Palins' assertions that they were afraid of Wooten because of threats they said he made. &amp;quot;Such claims of fear were not bona fide and were offered to provide cover for the Palins' real motivation: to get Trooper Wooten fired for personal family related reasons,&amp;quot; he wrote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_10692757?source=most_viewed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A preemptive response to this report was issued by the McCain/Palin campaign on October 9th, in which the campaign's own investigation concluded that Palin &amp;quot;acted within her proper and lawful authority in the reassignment of Walt Monegan&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE4998X420081011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end the &amp;quot;October Surprise&amp;quot; predicted by the head of the commission came to pass. Although the commission was asked not to release its findings until after the election to avoid political posturing, they refused to do so. Apart from tarring and feathering Palin, the report made no recommendations for any further inquiries or punishment, as it was understood that there was no case to do so. No direct reports of Sarah Palin abusing her power were ever produced or asking for the official to be fired were ever produced, but that didn't stop the report from drawing its conclusions based upon conjecture without evidence. Indeed, after the hoopla over the report subsided, the state personnel board released its finding that exonerated her of any wrongdoing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081104/ap_on_el_pr/palin_troopergate&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vice Presidential Candidate==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mccainpalin.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Sarah Palin vice presidential announcement, 08/29/08.]] On August 29, 2008, Palin was announced to be the Vice Presidential nominee for Republican Senator John McCain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/sarah_palin_vp/2008/08/29/126138.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The selection was a surprise, as those in the media were expecting [[Minnesota]] Governor [[Tim Pawlenty]] or former [[Massachusetts]]'s Governor [[Mitt Romney]]. Palin adds youth and executive experience to the ticket. She is the second female Vice Presidential candidate of a major party in U.S. history and the first one on a Republican ticket. The first was [[Geraldine Ferraro]], who the Democratic Party put on the ticket under [[Walter Mondale]] in 1984.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin's speech before the Republican convention on Wednesday, September 3rd was watched by over 40 million people. She had as many people turn in to see her as watched Obama's acceptance speech on the final day of the Democratic convention. Palin has also been attacked by the press on a level not seen since [[Dan Quayle]], although she ultimately handled it much better.&lt;br /&gt;
===Democrat Responses===&lt;br /&gt;
In a possible problem for the Democratic ticket, a majority of people believed that the press was trying to hurt Palin&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.yahoo.com/story/rasmussen/20080904/pl_rasmussen/palinmedia20080904;_ylt=AqErk__wZIKdoVvqUXdr44Nh24cA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and that type of unwarranted attack could have backfired into more support for the McCain/Palin ticket especially with unaffiliated voters believing the press is purposely attacking Palin by a 49% to 32% margin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Democrats had advised the Obama campaign to ignore Palin, fearing that emphasis on her inexperience will backfire against Obama himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/capital/2008/09/05/tips-for-obama-ignore-palin-dis-mccain  Matt Coopoer, &amp;quot;Tips for Obama: Ignore Palin, Dis McCain,&amp;quot; Sept. 5, 2008, ''Conde-Nast Portfoloio.com'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She participated in a debate with the Democratic VP candidate Joe Biden on October 2, 2008, ending up being declared the winner by most credible news sources that are not  influenced by liberal bias. Palin &amp;quot;kept Joe Biden on the defensive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;ended up dominating [the debate]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14234.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a campaign event in [[Virginia]], Barack Obama said of the McCain/Palin ticket's similar policies, &amp;quot;...You can put lipstick on a pig, it's still a pig.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94481288&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Given the fact that she's stated &amp;quot;The difference between a hockey mom and a pitbull (is) lipstick&amp;quot; and the fact that only a female candidate would wear lipstick, the McCain camp released a web ad implying that the comment was targeting Governor Palin. The ad featured video clips of Gov. Palin convention speech, Obama's remarks at the campaign event, and a clip of Katie Couric commenting on pervasive sexism in the campaign. After extensive discussion in the news media, the ad was removed from McCain's website and other video sites following a copyright claim by CBS news.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/CBS_takes_down_McCain_webad_suggests_its_misleading.html?showall]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In what prosecutors described as an attempt to derail the campaign, Palin's private email account was hacked by a liberal activist and son of a Democratic lawmaker who was charged with four felonies carrying a maximum of 50 years for criminal privacy rights violations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/18/palin_email_investigation_continues/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The offender, a self described Obama supporter, was convicted and sentenced to one year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin is a lightning rod to the established [[liberal]] women's movement. She, like many high profile conservative females, has taken much abuse from the left. Palin has been forced to set up a legal defense fund to help pay for fees related to an onslaught of ethic complaints, which are always frivolous.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/18738 Palin blasts Obama administration: Government wants to &amp;quot;control the people&amp;quot;] CNN&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Because she is retiring from being governor of Alaska, the anti-American liberals pat themselves on the back in glee. Liberals still fail to understand that she is ''the'' typical conservative that the majority of Americans identify with. Her principles and her outlook on Americanism is a model for all future leaders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin said of the people who have filed the complaints:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote| '''Those are the folks who want to tell me, they want to tell you, to sit down and shut up. We will not do that. I just can't, because I love my state. I love my country.''' }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Impact on Ticket===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the run-up to the Vice-Presidential debate on October 2, 2008, a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center attempted to measure the degree to which Palin impacted the GOP ticket positively or negatively in September.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://people-press.org/report/456/obama-regains-lead&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The survey compared the answers to two identical questions about her qualifications and overall favorable/unfavorable rating between polls taken in early and late September. The results show that public opinion of Palin has fallen significantly since the Republican convention, particularly in the public's opinion of her qualification to be Vice President. Faced with a barrage of negative press attacks after her nomination, some prominent Republicans like [[Mitt Romney]] believe that the isolation of Palin from the media in September was a mistake, and are calling for an increase in unscripted encounters with the press and public to counter that perception. According to Romney, &amp;quot;Holding Sarah Palin to just three interviews and microscopically focusing on each interview I think has been a mistake. I think they’d be a lot wiser to let Sarah Palin be Sarah Palin. Let her talk to the media, let her talk to people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2008/09/30/doubts-about-palin-grow-even-among-conservatives/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Exit polling from the election itself had the final say on the matter of her impact on the ticket. For those who considered her nomination on the ticket to be unimportant, 57% voted for Obama. For those who considered her nomination to be important, 53% voted for Obama, thereby showing a positive overall impact on the ticket. Considering that exit polling tilts Democratic, the actual impact may have been greater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When asked during an interview with liberal media pundit Katie Couric what newspapers and magazines Palin read (a classic [[Liberal trap]]), Palin fumbled and was unable to name any particular news source because of the side-swipe. This added fuel to charges that she was not qualified to run for Vice President, when in fact she was clearly qualified by her service as governor. Palin charges back at Couric and other liberal media attacks in her book [[Going Rogue]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Palin in 2012==&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has the support of a large, enthusiastic base on the right that is ready to work for her in Republican primaries. She has been coy about announcing plans for 2012, but she is well positioned for a presidential run, assuming she can raise the $50+ million required to campaign effectively. Given her personal charisma and Reagan-esque connection with average, conservative Americans, she may be able to pull off a resounding victory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.capitalcityweekly.com/stories/120308/new_363163237.shtml Sarah Palin hits Republican talking points while stumping in Georgia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==SarahPAC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 27, 2009 Palin formed the political action committee (PAC) SarahPAC. The organization supports &amp;quot;energy independence and reform&amp;quot; and will endorse candidates who &amp;quot;share Governor Palin’s ideas and goals.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;amp;sid=azCCxotgdG1E&amp;amp;refer=home&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palin.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Palin believes in [[Real America]] and has referred to it often in her speeches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin filled out a policy questionnaire for the Eagle Forum Alaska during her 2006 gubernatorial race. One question asked, &amp;quot;Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?&amp;quot;  Palin responded, &amp;quot;Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.&amp;quot;  Yet [[public schools]] still resist teaching abstinence and instead promote sexual behavior by teenagers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another question asked, &amp;quot;Are you offended by the phrase 'Under God' in the [[Pledge of Allegiance]]? Why or why not?&amp;quot;  Palin replied, &amp;quot;Not on your life. '''If it was good enough for the Founding Fathers''', it's good enough for me and I'll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many liberals ignorant of the history of &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; have tried to ridicule Palin's remark, even calling her an &amp;quot;idiot&amp;quot; for it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2008/sep/01/week&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892, and George Washington's phrase &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; was added to it in June 1954.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In fact, the origin of the phrase &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; is the General Orders of [[George Washington]] on July 2 and 9, 1776: &amp;quot;The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and conduct of this army&amp;quot; (July 2); &amp;quot;the peace and safety of the Country now depends, under God, solely on the success of our arms&amp;quot; (July 9).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/264xqezm.asp?pg=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; George Washington was indeed a [[Founding Father]], and the Founding Fathers made no secret of their Christian faith and unfailing belief in God in the [[Declaration of Independence]] and later writings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin also believes that students need to learn of the controversy surrounding the [[Theory of evolution|Theory of evolution]], and that discussing Creationism should not be banned from schools. During the 2006 campaign for the Alaskan Governorship, Palin was answering a question from the moderator near the conclusion of Wednesday night's televised debate on KAKM Channel 7 when she said, &amp;quot;Teach both. You know, don't be afraid of information. Healthy debate is so important, and it's so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dwb.adn.com/news/politics/elections/story/8347904p-8243554c.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She later clarified her position by stating &amp;quot;I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum.&amp;quot;  She added that, if elected, she would not push the state Board of Education to add such creation-based alternatives to the state's required curriculum. As of September 2008 she has kept that pledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an example of liberal mockery, the [[Huffington Post]] attempted to make light of Sarah Palin's creationist beliefs, highlighting the creationism belief that [[dinosaur|dinosaurs]] and man coexisted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/28/palin-claimed-dinosaurs-a_n_130012.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Saturday Night Live]] likewise did a skit in which they had her refer to the Museum of Natural History as &amp;quot;that evolution museum&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Church Life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sarah Palin was baptized as a [[Roman Catholic]] and, at age 12, she was rebaptized in the Wasilla Assembly of God church.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web&lt;br /&gt;
|accessdate=2008-08-30&lt;br /&gt;
|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-mccainveepbio30-2008aug30,0,2159346.story&lt;br /&gt;
|title=Palin has risen quickly from PTA to VP pick&lt;br /&gt;
|author=Decker, Cathleen and Michael Finnegan,&lt;br /&gt;
|work=Los Angeles Times&lt;br /&gt;
|date=August 30, 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news&lt;br /&gt;
| last = Gorsk| first = Eric&lt;br /&gt;
| url = http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g4-w_DCWffagBaQb8Il9a0R2hkPAD92SL7E00&lt;br /&gt;
| title = Evangelicals energized by McCain-Palin ticket&lt;br /&gt;
| publisher =Associated Press&lt;br /&gt;
| date = 2008-08-30&lt;br /&gt;
| accessdate = 2008-08-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin attends the Wasilla Bible Church&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |first=David |last=Pepper |title=Regarding Governor Palin: A Letter from Pastor David Pepper |url=http://churchontherockak.org/Regarding-Sarah-Palin.html |publisher=Church on the Rock |accessdate=2008-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, an independent congregation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://www.wasillabible.org/faq.htm |title=Wasilla Bible Church FAQ |accessdate=2008-09-05 |work= |publisher= |date= }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;miller&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lisa Miller and Amanda Coyne. &amp;quot;[http://www.newsweek.com/id/156679 A Visit to Palin's Church: Scripture and discretion on the program in Wasilla].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''. Sept. 2, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when at home and attended the Juneau Christian Center when in Juneau as governor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |title=Statement Concerning Sarah Palin |url=http://www.jccalaska.com/images/10000/3000/582JU/user/palin.htm |publisher=Juneau Christian Center |date=2008-09-03 |accessdate=2008-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
Palin earned the highest TV ratings at the Republican convention when she spoke, even surpassing McCain's acceptance speech, and nearly matched Obama's acceptance speech&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/palin-triggers-rnc-ratings-spike/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, gaining unprecedented attention. Likewise her Vice Presidential debate with [[Joe Biden]] had more viewers than any of the three debates between McCain and Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14201.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also, her brief appearance on Saturday Night Live in October 2008 gave the show its highest ratings in 14 years, and was actually the third highest ranked show for the week based on the number of people who tuned in originally to watch her, 17 million, even though it ran at midnight in the East Coast Market.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/oct/20/ustelevision-tvratings&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sarah Palin's Alaska''' her reality show on The Learning Channel (TLC) drew about 2.5 million viewers on premier Sunday night, dominating its time slot&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/12/25/sunday-1219-cable-ratings-sarah-palins-alaska-top-gear-ax-men-leverage-kendra-real-housewives-more/76555&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and breaking TLC records with 5 million viewers having tuned in to watch the first episode.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/15/sarah-palins-alaska-ratings-tlc_n_783740.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Publications==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Palin Book2.jpg|right|125px]]&lt;br /&gt;
* '''''&amp;quot;America by Heart; Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag&amp;quot;''''', Harper-Collins, November 2010.  &amp;quot;Palin delivers an intimate and personal look at the woman behind the public servant. In her #1 New York Times bestselling memoir Going Rogue—the bestselling nonfiction book of 2009—Palin gave readers a look at her upbringing, her dynamic career, and her candidacy next to John McCain for the Vice Presidency of the United States. In this inspirational follow-up, her reflections on faith, family, and patriotism will read like a bible of American virtues for anyone hoping to understand the truths that lie at the heart of the nation.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.harpercollins.com/books/America-Heart-Sarah-Palin/?isbn=9780062010964?AA=index_authorIntro_36341 America by Heart; Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag - Harper Collins Website]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''''[[Going Rogue: An American Life]]''''', [[Memoir]], published by Harper-Collins:(November 2009)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2009/10/01/amazing-palin%E2%80%99s-book-number-one-on-both-amazon-and-barnes-unprecedented/ Amazing: Palin’s book number one on both Amazon and Barnes &amp;amp; Noble bestseller list, Audacity of Hypocrisy, October 1, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rush Limbaugh. [http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111709/content/01125120.guest.html Rush Interviews Governor Sarah Palin], ''RushLimbaugh.com'', November 17, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Robert Shaffer. [http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/17/ap-turns-heads-devoting-reporters-palin-book-fact-check/ AP Turns Heads for Devoting 11 Reporters to Palin Book 'Fact Check'], ''FOXNews.com'', November 17, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Palin has decided that her book royalties will be donated to families of Ft. Hood victims. ''&amp;quot;I'm joining the efforts of many others by donating my royalties from the book sales during our stop at Fort Hood to the families of the victims whose lives have been forever changed by the tragic events.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{conservatism}}&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gov.state.ak.us/ State of Alaska - Governor Sarah Palin Official Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nga.org/portal/site/nga/menuitem.29fab9fb4add37305ddcbeeb501010a0/?vgnextoid=864bb9006da3f010VgnVCM1000001a01010aRCRD National Governor's Association - Alaska Governor Sarah Palin]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://votesmart.org/bio.php?can_id=27200 Project Vote Smart - Governor Sarah H. Palin]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/Sarah_Palin.htm Sarah Palin On the issues]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://parentingfreedom.com/2008/09/03/sarah-palin-mother-and-first-female-vice-president-pictures-children-parenting/ Sarah Palin: Mother and First Female Vice President], ''Parenting Freedom'', September 03, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://churchformen.blogspot.com/2008/09/people-around-world-are-asking-who-is.html Sarah Palin, a friend of mine]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDE3MmE5MDVmMGM1YjQ2NmVhMjJkN2I2ZTcxMzhlNjU=&amp;amp;w=MA== I Still Hate You, Sarah Palin] National Review Online&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/256099/i-hate-you-bristol-palin-david-kahane?page=1 I Hate You, Bristol Palin] National Review Online&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Palin, Sarah}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alaska Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Mayors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tea Party Movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lisa_Murkowski&amp;diff=847925</id>
		<title>Lisa Murkowski</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lisa_Murkowski&amp;diff=847925"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T03:59:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* 2010 Midterm Elections */  I have a real problem with saying that 8% misspellings means that her voters were uneducated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Lisa Murkowski&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Lisa-murkowski.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Verne Martell&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=Roman Catholic&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Alaska&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=December 20, 2002 - Present&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Frank Murkowski]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Lisa Ann Murkowski''', born May 22, 1957 (age {{age|1957|5|22}}), is the senior [[United States]] [[U.S. Senator| Senator]] from [[Alaska]] and a member of the [[Republican Party]]. She is Alaska's first female senator and the first U.S. Senator born in Alaska. In 1998, Murkowski was elected to the Alaska [[House of Representatives]] and had been elected the House Majority Leader for the 2003–2004 session. In December of 2002, her father, Governor [[Frank Murkowski]], appointed her to a vacant seat in the United States Senate, resulting in charges of nepotism. In her 2004 reelection she was considered the [[Democrat|Democrats]] best chance to pick up a seat from an incumbent Republican. Murkowski was elected to a full six year term by a 49%-46% margin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2010 Midterm Elections==&lt;br /&gt;
In a stunning upset, she was defeated for renomination in 2010 by Tea Party favorite and pro-life conservative[[Joe Miller]]. Murkowski ran a write in candidacy, which was especially complicated due to the high rate of non-english speakers who supported her. Approximately 8,000 of the 100,000 write in votes cast for her were misspelled, the most common misspelling was Merkowski, but Murkowsky and Murcowski were also common. For comparison the last major write in candidate, Robin Taylor, who was the Republican party nominee running against a withdrawn candidate and a [[Democrat]] had about 15% misspellings, Robin Taylor is far easier to spell than Lisa Murkowski.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political views==&lt;br /&gt;
Lisa Murkowski supports oil exploration in her home state of Alaska, saying that recent technological developments have reduced the environmental risks of drilling in ANWR. Murkowski has a reputation as a &amp;quot;[[moderate Republican]]&amp;quot; (i.e. liberal); she is a [[RINO]] by definition, Republican-in-name-only, according to [[Rush Limbaugh]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Rush Limbaugh]].[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111710/content/01125110.guest.html Lisa Murkowksi, RINO Run Wild], RushLimbaugh.com, November 17, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Murkowski has said this of the [[Obama administration]] and [[President Obama]] in particular: &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I will tell you, I am not one of those who wants Obama to fail.  If he does well that means the country is doing well.  We don't have time as a nation to spend all of what we do blocking.  We have got to figure out how we get to a point where we can be sitting around a table and talking about these difficult problems and advancing some solutions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Rush Limbaugh]]. [http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/content/home/daily/site_111610/content/01125107.guest.html Lisa Murkowski is an Idiot], RushLimbaugh.com, November 16, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
Lisa Murkowski received a 14% rating from [[NARAL Pro-Choice America]], indicating a pro-life voting record although she describes herself as &amp;quot;[[pro-choice]].&amp;quot; She is also a member of several abortion rights groups such as The Republican Majority For Choice, Republicans For Choice and The Wish List. Murkowski voted to ban [[partial birth abortion]] and to make it a criminal penalty for harming an unborn fetus during other crimes. Murkowski likewise is a strong advocate of taxpayer-funded human embryo experimentation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Murkowski is one of ten Republican Senators who refused to commit to Senate Majority Leader [[Bill Frist]]'s &amp;quot;nuclear option&amp;quot; to end judicial filibusters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2009, Murkowski authored legislation that would ban the [[Environmental Protection Agency]] from regulating carbon dioxide, which is opposed by the [[Obama administration]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27509.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://murkowski.senate.gov/ Official Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Lisa_Murkowski.htm On the Issues]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/m001153/ Voting Record]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opencongress.org/people/show/300075_lisa_murkowski OpenCongress]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Murkowski, Lisa Ann}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: 110th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:111th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alaska]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joe_Miller&amp;diff=847902</id>
		<title>Joe Miller</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joe_Miller&amp;diff=847902"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T02:50:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: More complete story, Joe is a conservative, and I really like his economics, but he is not good at elections&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Portrait miller.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joseph &amp;quot;Joe&amp;quot; Miller''' (born May 10, 1967 in Osborne, Kansas) is an attorney and [[Republican]] nominee for [[U.S. Senate]] in [[Alaska]] for the [[2010 Midterm Elections|2010 General Election]] after defeating [[Lisa Murkowski]]. Joe Miller's campaign focus is on beating the Democrats with a message of limited federal government and states' rights in November. Miller is a graduate from the [[United States Military Academy]] at [[West Point]], earned a Juris Doctor at [[Yale|Yale Law School]], and a Masters degree in economics from the [[University of Alaska]]. Miller received a bronze star for his service as a M1A1 tank platoon leader in the first [[Gulf War]]. The young first lieutenant was entrusted with leading the 1st Combat Brigade's 93-mile road march that preceded the sweep into [[Iraq]] and [[Kuwait]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://articles.latimes.com/2010/sep/07/nation/la-na-alaska-miller-20100907/2 For Alaska's restive right, it's Joe Miller time, LA Times, Septemeber 7, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2002, he was appointed a United States Magistrate Judge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 2010 Election == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Miller defeated incumbent [[RINO]] Lisa Murkowski for the Republican nomination, He was able to do this because of his clear [[pro-life stance]]. Joe Miller did not effectively handle the media, even going so far as to have one reporter and online news magazine editor handcuffed by a heavy handed security detail he inexplicably brought to a middle school.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adn.com/2010/10/17/1506223/miller-security-guards-handcuff.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Selfishly exploiting his lack of media savvy Murkowski decided to run as a write-in candidate. Murkowski was able to secur millions of dollars in advertising from the [[Alaska Native Corporations]], which were created by legislation written by [[Ted Stevens]] and depend on spending from the appropriations committee to make their money. Depending on whether misspelled ballots are counted Murkowski either won by 2,000 votes, or by nearly 10,000 votes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.elections.alaska.gov/results/10GENR/data/results.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/121210/loc_755533373.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The State of Alaska, Alaska case law, and federal election guidelines all indicate that voter intent is the important factor for determining if a vote should be counted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tea Party Movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sarah Palin]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tea Party Express]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Senate Conservatives Fund]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://joemiller.us/ Joe Miller for U.S. Senate]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://joemiller.us/issues Joe Miller] - On the Issues&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://joemiller.us/endorsements Alaskans Endorse Joe Miller]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.facebook.com/JoeMillerAlaska Facebook page]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://twitter.com/JoeWMiller Twitter page]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.youtube.com/joemillerus YouTube channel]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.flickr.com/photos/joewmiller/ Flickr page]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.linkedin.com/in/joewmiller Linkedin page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Miller, Joe}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2010 Midterm Elections]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tea Party Movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{conservatism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Martyp&amp;diff=847898</id>
		<title>User talk:Martyp</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Martyp&amp;diff=847898"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T02:30:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* Good stuff */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Welcome|sig=--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 18:52, 5 November 2010 (EDT)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== -elect category ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is lots of work....but remember it needs to be emptied shortly after the first of the year when they no longer will be ____elect! --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:38, 7 November 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== conflict over [[Obama]] article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Marty, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I temporarily blocked you just as a notice to resolve the conflict you seem to be having with another user over the [[Obama]] article. How about we settle the issue about the authorization of oil drilling on the [[Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama|talk page]] instead of constantly reverting each other's edits? [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:55, 1 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;gt;I'm not interested in edit-warring either--I'll allow the more senior admins to rule on the issue. Cheers! [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 20:08, 1 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::That would be appropriate. Just be sure to raise your concerns on one of their talk pages or the talk page for the article to make sure that everyone remembers. Thanks! [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:06, 1 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Hernan Lara Zavala]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 13:31, 30 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...for undoing the troll. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 18:26, 3 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not a problem. Would be easier without going through the captcha each time. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 18:28, 3 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Good stuff ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My job is more of a speaking position than a writing position, I appreciate your help on the [[Sarah Palin]] article. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 21:30, 8 February 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=847895</id>
		<title>Essay:Best New Conservative Words</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=847895"/>
		<updated>2011-02-09T02:27:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AlaskanEconomy: /* Conservative words and terms */  Alan Turing coined this&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Tax-spend.jpg|thumb|480px|The &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; slogan stuck to [[Harry Hopkins]] like a well-fitted suit.]]Each year the [[English language]] develops about a thousand new words.  The [[King James Version]] of the [[Bible]] contains only about 8,000 different words,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8013859.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and many good words have developed since then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative]] terms, which express [[conservative insights]], are being generated at a faster rate, and with much higher quality, than [[liberal]] terms are.  This implies an inevitable conservative triumph over liberalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Powerful, insightful new conservative terms have grown at a [[geometric progression|geometric rate]], roughly doubling every century.  For each insightful new conservative term originating in the 1600s, there are two new terms originating in the 1700s, four new terms in the 1800s, and eight new terms in the 1900s, for a pattern of &amp;quot;1-2-4-8&amp;quot;.  This implies a more conservative future and a correlation between conservatism and truth.  The year 1612 is our starting point: the King James Version of the Bible was published in 1611, and [[William Shakespeare]] had written nearly all his plays.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Century&lt;br /&gt;
!# New Conservative Terms&lt;br /&gt;
!Most Prolific Periods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1600s&lt;br /&gt;
|23&lt;br /&gt;
|period following publication of [[KJV]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1700s&lt;br /&gt;
|46&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Great Awakening|Great Awaken.]], [[American Revolution|Am. Revol.]], [[Constitutional Convention|Const. Conv.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|93&lt;br /&gt;
|1820s - political transition and conflict&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|185&lt;br /&gt;
|1940s - [[World War II|WWII]] and postwar transition&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|15 (preliminary)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservative words and terms==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--{| align=lwft border=1 cellspacing=0 style=&amp;quot;border-width: 5px; border-color: #c0c0c0; background: #e0e0e0; margin: 2em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | Newest Layer by century, 1600s-1900s&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; 0-0-0-0&lt;br /&gt;
|}--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!New Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[accountability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|the willingness or obligation to be held responsible for one's actions- a fundamental conservative ideal, unlike liberals who believe that 'society,' and not individuals, are responsible for their wrongdoing. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action-at-a-distance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1693&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Newton]]'s acceptance of this concept -- which became fundamental to [[electrostatics]] and [[quantum mechanics]] and has a basis in Christianity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', [[Jesus]]'s cure of the centurion's slave.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; -- was central to the development of his theory of gravity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-philosophy/#ActDis&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Einstein criticized this concept as &amp;quot;spooky&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|activism&lt;br /&gt;
|1915&lt;br /&gt;
|this differentiates conservatives from inactive people; this term might have originated in connection with [[Prohibition]] and efforts to pass the [[Eighteenth Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|aerobics&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|invented by the [[Christian]] Dr. Kenneth H. Cooper&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianadvice.net/famous_christians.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to describe his self-help, revolutionary program to improve health, he entitled his ground-breaking book in 1968 ''Aerobics''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|alarmism&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|needless warnings, as in the politically motivated claims of [[global warming]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{#ifexist: alcoholism | [[alcoholism]] | alcoholism }}&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive or addictive drinking of alcohol&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|algorithm&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient and consistent step-by-step methodology for achieving a goal, the opposite of [[liberal style]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|altruism&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|selfless assistance of others; this also occurs in the animal kingdom, and is a [[counterexample to evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|American exceptionalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1835&lt;br /&gt;
|the idea that the United States and the American people hold a special place in the world, by offering opportunity and hope for humanity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ambulance chaser&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|a lawyer who searches for victims to persuade them to sue for his profit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American dream]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1911 is the date given by the &amp;quot;OED&amp;quot;, which refers to the Oxford English Dictionary. The Merriam-Webster dictionary gives a date of 1931.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the idea that one’s work should be rewarding.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|American Way&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&lt;br /&gt;
|later conservative entrepreneurs used this to coin a new name for what became a highly successful and uniquely American business model: &amp;quot;Amway&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[anti-Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing Christian ideals and institutions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anticompetitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|interfering with open competition and the enormous benefits that flow from it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|antilife&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|critical term describing a tendency to oppose life and lifesaving care&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apple pie&lt;br /&gt;
|1780&lt;br /&gt;
|honesty, simplicity, wholesomeness. Relating to, or characterized by traditionally American values. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apple%20pie Merriam-webster- Apple pie]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|assimilate&lt;br /&gt;
|1880s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;estimate only; this originated sometime in the late 1880s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the desired absorption of immigrant groups into the culture and mores of the resident population&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|attention span&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|correlated with intelligence, the attention span is how long someone can concentrate on something.  It is rapidly shortening; the Lincoln-Douglas debates 150 years ago lasted for hours, but none do today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.help4teachers.com/ras.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The average length of sentences in speech is another indication of attention span, and it has been shortening significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|baby boom&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in birthrate, which is a good thing; note that the baby boom actually started before World War II, contrary to what textbooks teach. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bailout]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|wasting taxpayer money to rescue, temporarily, a failing company&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|balkanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|to break a region or neighborhood into divisive components; the opposite of the American concept of assimilation or &amp;quot;[[E pluribus unum]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bedrock&lt;br /&gt;
|1840-1850&lt;br /&gt;
|an American term for unbroken solid rock underneath fragments or soil, which adopted the figurative meaning of strong values:  &amp;quot;bedrock principles&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bedrock&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|beltway mentality&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Paul Weyrich]] though possibly first used by then-Governor [[John Sununu]] (&amp;quot;captives of yourselves&amp;quot;), it refers to a governing style that sees only as far as the highway that surrounds its capital, especially the one around D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|biased&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&lt;br /&gt;
|to show prejudice for or against something; American society is rapidly becoming ''biased'' against Christian and Conservative beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Big Brother&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|government constantly watching its citizens; [[George Orwell]] first coined this term in his classic, ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|biological clock&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how each woman begins to lose her ability to have children at age 27, no matter how much [[feminists]] try to conceal this scientific fact from women&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Blame America Crowd&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or &amp;quot;Blame-America-First Crowd&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Barone quoted [[Jeane Kirkpatrick]] as saying that the &amp;quot;San Francisco Democrats&amp;quot; (site of the Democratic National Convention in 1984) &amp;quot;always blame America first.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creators.com/opinion/michael-barone/the-blame-america-first-crowd.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blank check&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|irresponsibly giving someone unlimited spending authority or power, as in &amp;quot;a Con Con would be a blank check to destroy the nation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Blue Dog Democrat]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who adheres to conservative principles within the Democratic party, once called a Boll Weevil; as of 2009 there are 45-50 Blue Dog Democrats in the [[House of Representatives]], which is enough to form a majority with [[Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boondoggle&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;popularized during the [[New Deal]] as a contemptuous word for make-work projects for the unemployed.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=boondoggle&amp;amp;searchmode=none&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The term gained popularity in [[Canada]] following a corruption scandal tied to the [[Liberal]] government in 2000.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boomerang&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|originally coined to describe a throwing device that returns to the thrower, the term became increasingly useful to describe how wrongful conduct returns to bite the perpetrator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bootstrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|unaided effort, personal merit, hard work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bork&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by William Safire to refer to how Democrats savage a conservative nominee, such as their defeat of Supreme Court nominee [[Robert H. Bork]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|born-again&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|it takes an open mind and heart&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainstorm&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|a burst of productive thought&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainwashing&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|derived from the Chinese term &amp;quot;xǐnǎo&amp;quot; soon after the [[communist]] takeover of China, &amp;quot;brainwashing&amp;quot; means forced abandonment of [[faith]] in favor of regimented [[atheism]]. In a more general sense, it refers to the manipulation and control of the human mind through torture and propaganda techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brinkmanship&lt;br /&gt;
|1956&lt;br /&gt;
|the art of displaying a willingness to use military force in order to obtain a just resolution to a conflict between nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bureaucracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1818&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|busywork&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|meaningless activity under the pretense of accomplishing something&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|can-do&lt;br /&gt;
|1903 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; according to the Oxford English Dictionary. [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/can-do Miram-webster] gives the date of 1945 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Phrase coined in a short story by [[Rudyard Kipling]] that has come to refer to an attitude that espouses individual ability and responsibility and not reliance on [[entitlements]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-1855&lt;br /&gt;
|creating jobs and wealth based on a private invention, ownership and investments rather than state-controlled resources&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[carpetbagger]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|a politician who moves to a new area to be elected to a government position, as in [[Hillary Clinton]] moving to [[New York]] to become a U.S. Senator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|catharsis&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|facilitating forgiveness and spiritual renewal by expression, as in writing or teaching or confession&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|caucus&lt;br /&gt;
|1763&lt;br /&gt;
|citizens or representatives gathering to meet and reach political decisions as a group while harnessing aspects of the [[best of the public]]; first coined by John Adams&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The future author of the Massachusetts Constitution who also played a role in developing the [[Declaration of Independence]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when he described a meeting of political Boston elders as a &amp;quot;caucus club&amp;quot;; the word may be from an Algonquian term for a group of advisers or elders.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|chaperone&lt;br /&gt;
|1720&lt;br /&gt;
|care and well-being of youths overseen by adults&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|charisma&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|literally &amp;quot;a gift from God&amp;quot;, charisma is a personal magic of leadership found in [[conservative]] public figures (but beware of the liberal tendency to put style before substance!) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Chicken Little&lt;br /&gt;
|1895&lt;br /&gt;
|one who falsely predicts disaster, especially for silly reasons: &amp;quot;global alarmists&amp;quot; are the Chicken Littles of our time&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In characteristically [[liberal]] style, the online Merriam-Webster spins the [[global warming]] example usage by saying the data showed he wasn't a Chicken Little.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|circle the wagons&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|regroup with family and friends, when under attack. usage from settlers in the old US west.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|citizen's arrest&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|private enforcement of the law without the need of a taxpayer-funded police officer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|civil defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|civilians protecting themselves and their community against attack or natural disasters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1799&lt;br /&gt;
|pretentious, verbose, and often liberal nonsense; example usage: &amp;quot;the professor wasted the rest of the class on his liberal claptrap&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|closed shop&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&lt;br /&gt;
|a business that requires membership in a union as a condition of working there; 22 conservative states prohibit this&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Coase theorem|Coasean]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient result or bargain based on market forces without the distortions caused by [[transaction costs]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cogent&lt;br /&gt;
|1659&lt;br /&gt;
|compelling with the powerful force of reason, the opposite of [[liberal]] claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Columbian&lt;br /&gt;
|1757&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to Christopher Columbus ''or the United States''	&lt;br /&gt;
|-	&lt;br /&gt;
|Cold War&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|recognition that communist nations were at war with American freedom even in the absence of actual military conflict&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|common sense&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|sound judgment based on facts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|competitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Con Con&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Phyllis Schlafly]] to highlight the deception and risks inherent in proposed national constitutional conventions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conniption&lt;br /&gt;
|1833&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria or alarm, as in &amp;quot;having a conniption fit&amp;quot;; a typical response by [[liberals]] when confronted with their [[double standards]] and illogical positions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conservation of charge&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|overall charge does not change in an isolated system; it is neither created nor destroyed; the concept was first suggested by [[Benjamin Franklin]] but the date of origin for this term is surprisingly recent&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who adheres to principles of limited government, personal responsibility and moral values&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=conservative&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative field]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1870s?&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of physical force over a region such that items moving throughout the region can store energy ''without loss'', as in the planetary system and electrical products&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The mathematical definition of a conservative field -- which arises in [[multivariable calculus]] -- is that a scalar potential exists for the function and, alternatively, it is [[irrotational]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constant&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) something unchanging in value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constitutionality&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|its date of origin is the year of the [[Constitutional Convention]] that proposed the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|coolant&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a fluid, typically water, that facilitates efficient energy production, especially nuclear energy to cool a reactor and slow down the fission of neutrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copacetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1890s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster officially lists its date of origin as 1919 and its source as unknown, but that is well after when Robinson says he developed it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Bill “Bojangles” Robinson, tap dancer extraordinaire, claimed the invention of this word; it was first popularized by African Americans&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copyright&lt;br /&gt;
|1735&lt;br /&gt;
|extending private property to protect expressive works&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|corporate socialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency of large corporations to act in a socialistic manner, at the expense of meritocracy and productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|correlate&lt;br /&gt;
|1742&lt;br /&gt;
|(verb) to show that one thing relates to another, such as [[atheism]] or [[homosexuality]] and selfishness or lack of charity; [[liberal]]s falsely rely on anecdotes to deny the general relationship&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[countability (Mathematics)|countability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1874&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Georg Cantor]], loathed by the leading contemporary [[mathematicians]], developed this in proving that the real numbers are ''uncountable''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterexample&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|an example that is contrary to the proposition. A common point in logical, reasoned debate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterfactual&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|especially assumptions that are contrary to fact; Chief Justice [[John Roberts]] wrote for the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], &amp;quot;petitioners' standing does not require precise proof of what the Board's policies might have been in that counterfactual world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Free Enter. Fund v. Pub. Co. Accounting Oversight Bd.'', 130 S. Ct. 3138, 3163 (2010) (5-4 decision).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crackpot&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|crazy talk, lunacy, a person on the fringe of reality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[creation science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|a term coined by the anti-[[evolution|evolutionist]] [[Henry Morris]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/28/AR2006022801716.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cross-examination&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|the most effective tool against [[liberal]] [[deceit]], better than even the requirement of an oath&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crystal clear&lt;br /&gt;
|1815&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals are the opposite&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[culture war]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after the book ''Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America'' by James Davison Hunter&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cyberbullying&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of obnoxious and hurtful liberal behavior on the internet&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deadweight loss]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Confirmation of the first use is desired.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the loss in overall wealth and efficiency imposed by monopolies and taxation, due to the loss in extra value that someone would have received beyond what he would have paid for a good at a free market price&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|death tax&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|interestingly, the term was coined by Canadians opposed to the high estate tax on their assets held in the United States; Frank Luntz is credited with later popularizing this term in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' Dr. Frank Luntz, ''Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decentralization&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|the dispersion of power, as in a shift from national to local control&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decrypt&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|military code-breaking, which played an instrumental role in World War II in deciphering enemy codes that many felt were unbreakable; illustrates the &amp;quot;can do&amp;quot; approach of conservatism in a patriotic way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[defeatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|a negative attitude that becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deflation&lt;br /&gt;
|1891&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in the value of savings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|defund&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|refers especially to termination of government funding of a wasteful or hurtful program&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deliberative assembly&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Introduction to Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised'' (19th Ed. 2000), xxv.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Edmund Burke in describing the British parliament during a speech to voters in Bristol; he meant a body of persons meeting to discuss and decide common action under parliamentary law&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|demagogue&lt;br /&gt;
|1648&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deregulation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|Reagan won in 1980 by campaigning on this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|design by committee&lt;br /&gt;
|before 1958&lt;br /&gt;
|pejorative term directed against collective production by a group &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|despotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1727&lt;br /&gt;
|a ruler with unlimited powers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deterrence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devalue&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|describing an unwelcome attitude or act, as in &amp;quot;devaluing human life&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devotee&lt;br /&gt;
|1645&lt;br /&gt;
|ardent follower, supporter, or loyalty to. 56 years separates devotee and devoted&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|disinformation&lt;br /&gt;
|1950s&lt;br /&gt;
|false information spread (and sometimes manufactured) by groups with a strong political agenda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|division of labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|increasing productivity through specialization of labor, as in a husband working in manufacturing while his wife cares for children&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dog and pony show&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|an overblown event, typically having more fanfare than substance; liberals like to run a &amp;quot;dog and pony show&amp;quot; in towns having a large public university, where younger people are attracted to it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|domino effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|how the fall of one nation to communism can result in its harmful spread to neighboring nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|double standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|applying harsher criticism against one group, such as churchgoers or conservatives, than against another group, such as atheists or liberals; recognition of a double standard by the [[Prodigal Son]] led him to repent and convert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doublethink&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|a term first coined by [[George Orwell]] in his dystopian novel ''[[1984]]''; it means simultaneously holding contradictory beliefs, which is a characteristic of [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doubting Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who believes only what he can see and touch, and doubts all else&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dumb down&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eagle Scout&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest rank in the [[Boy Scouts]], the term also means &amp;quot;a straight-arrow and self-reliant man.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|editorialize&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;to introduce opinion into the reporting of facts&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[efficiency]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1633&lt;br /&gt;
|ultimately from the Latin ''efficientem'', meaning ''&amp;quot;working out, or accomplishing&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=efficient Online Etymological Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|egotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1714&lt;br /&gt;
|the root of atheism, as explained by Paul in Romans 1:21-22; the root of depression and anxiety also&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|electioneering&lt;br /&gt;
|1780s&lt;br /&gt;
|to work for the success of a particular candidate, party, ticket, etc., in an election. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elementary proof]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|a mathematical proof based on the minimum assumptions associated with real analysis; term probably does not predate [[complex analysis]] and its first use may have been the English mathematician James Joseph Sylvester's paper, &amp;quot;On an elementary proof and generalisation of Sir Isaac Newton's hitherto undenionstrated rule for the discovery of imaginary roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/circular129johnuoft/circular129johnuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[embryoscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first endoscopic image of the unborn child was in 1967, by Mandelbaum.  The date of origin of the term &amp;quot;embryoscopy&amp;quot; may have been later, but likely before the 1990s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Search this term on the internet and see the spectacular photos of the unborn child (&amp;quot;embryo&amp;quot;) that were &amp;quot;scoped&amp;quot; by tiny cameras.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entitlement]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|entrepreneur&lt;br /&gt;
|1852&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ethnic voting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|widely recognized and even advocated by some,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/5/2/3/4/p152345_index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet the dictionary doesn't yet recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eurosceptic&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who opposes joining the super-socialist [[European Union]]; some prefer the term &amp;quot;Eurorealist&amp;quot; to express this opposition, and sometimes &amp;quot;Eurosceptic&amp;quot; is used to criticize opponents of the EU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exceptional&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|same year of origin as the [[U.S. Constitution]]!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exculpatory&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|often used in the phrase &amp;quot;exculpatory evidence,&amp;quot; it took nearly 50 years to develop this term after origination of the legal term suggesting guilt: &amp;quot;incriminate&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|expose&lt;br /&gt;
|1803&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) a statement of the facts, typically to discredit wrongdoing by government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|faith healing&lt;br /&gt;
|1885&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[falsifiability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|first emphasized by Karl Popper in 1934, this helps define science:  if a proposition is false, then it can be shown to be false.  If not, then the proposition is not scientific.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[family values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1916&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after a speech by Vice President [[Dan Quayle]], 1992 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|father figure&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who fulfills the essential role of a father&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[federalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1789&lt;br /&gt;
|the unique system of dual sovereigns, state and federal (national), established by the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|feedback&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|an all-important element of accountability and improvement, and a key consideration in good engineering design&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[fellow traveller]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|may have existed earlier, but popularized in 1924 by Leon Trotsky. Describes a sympathizer of a cause but who does not formally belong to the cause, such as a [[communist]] sympathizer who is not part of the communist party. The term was invented by the communists in its original, non-negative sense, but the conservatives were the first to use it as a pejorative term. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Flip flop (politics)|flip-flop]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|''verb'', meaning to change political position, typically due to [[liberal]] pressure.  First used by the Republican S.I. Hayakawa campaign to describe California Democratic incumbent U.S. Senator John Tunney, whom Hayakawa defeated in an upset.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|force-feed&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|what liberals do to students in [[public schools]] today in training them to be [[atheist]]ic socialists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|forward-looking&lt;br /&gt;
|1800&lt;br /&gt;
|planning for the future rather than dwelling on the past&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Founding Fathers&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|the several dozen [[Christian]] men &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html Religious Affiliation of the Founding Fathers of the United States of America, Adherents.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who helped draft the formative documents of the United States&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[free enterprise]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free lunch&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|something acquired ostensibly without paying for it, as in welfare; often used to remind people that &amp;quot;there's no such thing as a free lunch&amp;quot; in order to point out that it must cost someone something, now or later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free market&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free world&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|areas of the world free of communism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|frontiersmen&lt;br /&gt;
|1814&lt;br /&gt;
|living and working in a self-sufficient manner and with courage in a new land.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|galvanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|as in, &amp;quot;the liberal proposals ''galvanized'' the grassroots in opposition&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[gambit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a sacrifice that obtains an advantageous position, as in the game of [[chess]] ([[Bobby Fischer]]'s queen's gambit was a masterpiece) or in real life (the [[Passion of Christ]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gang up&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|group pressure&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gateway drug&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|abuse of alcohol/marijuana eventually leads to harder drugs cocaine/heroin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gerrymandering&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by a newspaper editor to criticize the manipulation of the lines of a new district into a salamander shape&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allbusiness.com/information/publishing-industries/251259-1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that favored election of a liberal politician&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gimmick&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|originally meant a deceptive mechanical device for controlling a [[gambling]] machine, and then its meaning expanded to include all trickery to attract attention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|globalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|Merriam-Webster states it was first used in 1943&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/globalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the OED gives a date of 1965 for the exact term &amp;quot;globalism&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50095613/50095613se2?single=1&amp;amp;query_type=word&amp;amp;queryword=globalism&amp;amp;first=1&amp;amp;max_to_show=10&amp;amp;hilite=50095613se2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the term &amp;quot;globalization&amp;quot; was first used in the mid-1980s in a different, complimentary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|godsend&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|go-getter&lt;br /&gt;
|1921&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gold standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest standard; in currency, when money could be exchanged for a fixed amount of gold&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|golden parachute&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for a pre-arranged handout to a corporate executive when fired, as when the company is taken over by new ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Good Samaritan&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|how genuine charity is the best approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|goon&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a dim-witted thug, espec. one who intimidates on behalf of a union&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grade inflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency by Liberal educationalists and public schools to increase marks, irrespective of merit or actual achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grassroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|greasy spoon&lt;br /&gt;
|1902&lt;br /&gt;
|a free enterprise term for a small, cheap restaurant - which in many places is just what the public wants; reflects Jesus' [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]] about the digestive system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Great Awakening&lt;br /&gt;
|1730-1740&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian spiritualism recurs periodically.  See [[Essay:The Coming Fifth Great Awakening in America]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gresham's law&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency in a free market for bad money (which loses its value) to drive out (be used more often in transactions) than good money (which retains its value), because people want to horde the good money while getting rid of the bad money; a similar effect can be seen when profanity drives out intelligent discussion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|groupthink&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of thought consisting of conformity to a manufactured consensus and self-deception; coined by William H. Whyte in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hallmark&lt;br /&gt;
|1721&lt;br /&gt;
|purity, authentic, official seal, distinguishing feature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hardworking&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|harmless error&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|an insignificant violation of a duty or procedural rule; first used in ''Western Ins. Co. v. The Goody Friends'', 29 F. Cas. 764 (S.D. Ohio 1861) (referring to a duty)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hatchet job&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|still looking for the context of its first use; today it means an article, typically by a liberal, that misleadingly smears someone, typically a conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hawthorne effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&lt;br /&gt;
|the increase in achievement resulting merely from being observed; this was demonstrated by experiment at the Hawthorne Works of Western Electric in Cicero, Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heckler's veto&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by University of Chicago Law Professor Harvey Kalven, Jr., a strong supporter of free speech in politics, this term has been used in [[Supreme Court]] decisions by Justices [[Sam Alito]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' ''Pleasant Grove City v. Summum'', 129 S. Ct. 1125 (2009); ''see also'' ''Child Evangelism Fellowship of N.J., Inc. v. Stafford Twp. Sch. Dist.'', 386 F.3d 514 (3rd Cir. 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Antonin Scalia]], and [[Clarence Thomas]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Good News Club v. Milford Cent. Sch.'', 533 U.S. 98 (2001)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hippie&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who rejects traditional morality and does what he wants, often growing long hair and smoking [[marijuana]] rather than working hard; this term became increasingly pejorative over time&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hissy fit&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|an unjustified tantrum, typically female in nature, as in &amp;quot;[[feminist]]s had a hissy fit when [[Lawrence Summers]] suggested (but criticized) the possibility that women have weaker scientific aptitude than men, and Summers ultimately resigned.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hobson's choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;this term has the entertaining history of originating with an English liveryman who required customers to &amp;quot;choose&amp;quot; the horse closest to the door.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an ostensible choice that disguises a lack of freedom, because each alternative is completely unacceptable.  This term is invoked to criticize an illusory freedom of choice.  This term has been used in 48 cases by Supreme Court Justices, more often by conservatives than by liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hokey&lt;br /&gt;
|1927&lt;br /&gt;
|phony, in an obvious or corny way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|honor system&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|an approach to discipline that emphasizes and encourages trust, honesty and personal responsibility rather than constant supervision&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homeschool]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;the OED assigns a date of origin of 1850 to &amp;quot;homeschool&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homemaker]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1876&lt;br /&gt;
|a wife and mother whose efforts are wisely spent running the household for the family&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homosexual agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|used to promote the agenda in the book ''After the Ball'', but then used to criticize the movement by Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] in his dissent in''Lawrence v. Texas'' (2003)''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|human rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1766&lt;br /&gt;
|rights of all peoples, such as to &amp;quot;life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness&amp;quot; as set forth in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hyphenated American&lt;br /&gt;
|1889&lt;br /&gt;
|President Theodore Roosevelt said in 1915, &amp;quot;There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hypothesis&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a suggestion, typically scientific in nature, which must be tested and proven before asserted as truth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria&lt;br /&gt;
|1801&lt;br /&gt;
|From the Latin ''hystericus'', from Greek ''hystera '' meaning ''&amp;quot;womb&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hysteria Meriam Webster Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (an old notion that hysteria was caused by the [[womb]]).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|illiteracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1660&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals seek to produce illiterate voters who lack independence, and many graduates of the [[public schools]] are illiterate today&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incidental inequality&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|inequalities that result as side effects of an objectively just system &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incoherent&lt;br /&gt;
|1626&lt;br /&gt;
|the term often applies to liberal [[double standard]]s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incompleteness&lt;br /&gt;
|1931&lt;br /&gt;
|a system of logic or mathematics that includes propositions that are impossible to prove or disprove; term coined as a result of [[Kurt Godel]]'s work in 1931&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incrementalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|imposing bad political or social change slowly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|independence&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|free will&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|individualism&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|values, rights and duties arise from the individual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inerrancy&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|free from error, as in &amp;quot;biblical inerrancy&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inflationary&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|policies causing inflation of the monetary supply&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|informed consent&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|consent to surgery is meaningful only if informed, a requirement that should apply to abortion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|initiative&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|self-starting first step toward improvement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|insightful&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|what conservatism is about: gaining insights into the truth, and bettering individuals and society with them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intangible&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|something valuable that cannot be seen or touched, such as goodwill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intellectual property&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;we [should] protect intellectual property, the labors of the mind, productions and interests as much a man's own, and as much the fruit of his honest industry, as the wheat he cultivates, or the flocks he rears.&amp;quot;  ''Davoll v. Brown'', 7 F. Cas. 197 (Cir. Ct. Mass. 1845) (Woodbury, federal judge).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|interventionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;governmental interference in economic affairs at home or in political affairs of another country&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|invisible hand&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Adam Smith in the ''Wealth of Nations'' and widely used today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[invisible hand of marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|discovered on Conservapedia, it is the unseen force of productivity that results from marriage (only between a man and woman).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Iron curtain&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Winston Churchill in a speech in Missouri just after World War II, to describe the communist's figurative wall against freedom&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[irreducible complexity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[Alan Turing]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/nasty-feelings-in-the-ool-community-toward-yockey/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and later adopted by [[Michael Behe]]. A structure or system that could not possibly have evolved, because removing any part makes it nonfunctional, thereby showing that [[God]] must have created it whole into biology; if the [[Nobel Prize]] were not dominated by [[atheism]], Behe could win one for this insight.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ivory tower&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a description of the pampered culture of liberal [[professor values|professors]], and how far out of touch with the truth it is&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John Hancock&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|a personal signature, especially in a bold style that stands up for principles as John Hancock did with his signing the Declaration of Independence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial activism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in an article in ''Fortune'' magazine by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/278089&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and repeatedly used in U.S. Supreme Court opinions since 1967,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''United States v. Wade'', &lt;br /&gt;
388 U.S. 218 (1967).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet as of 2009 [[Merriam-Webster]] dictionary still fails to recognize this widely used term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial prejudice&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|the bias of a judge in favor of a political correct identity group intended to rig outcome equality in favor of that group based on subjective bias rather than objective justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial restraint&lt;br /&gt;
|1942&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Assuming that this court has power to act, it does not necessarily follow that it should act. ... In a number of situations, and in a number of cases, it has been held that courts should voluntarily refrain from using or asserting power. Where the use or assertion of power might be destructive of a well defined purpose of law or of a declared public policy such voluntarily imposed '''judicial restraint''' may be commendable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Osage Tribe of Indians v. Ickes, 45 F. Supp. 179, 184-85 (D.D.C. 1942) (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial supremacist&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|one who advocates that the courts should be supreme over the other branches of government for certain legal issues; first coined in a book by [[Phyllis Schlafly]]; first used by the judiciary by the Michigan Supreme Court in ''Paige v. City of Sterling Heights'', 476 Mich. 495 (2006).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A similar yet different concept, &amp;quot;judicial supremacy,&amp;quot; was coined by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justice [[Robert H. Jackson]] as the title of his book,'' The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy: A Study of a Crisis in American Political Power'' (New York: Knopf, 1941).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial taking]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|the deprivation of private property due to a court decision; this concept was introduced by conservative Justice [[Potter Stewart]] in 1967, and the term was used for the first time independently by the Michigan and Hawaii Supreme Courts in the same month (!) in December 1982, and then used often in law review articles and Circuit Court decisions in the 2000s, and then four Justices of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] endorsed the principle in a decision in 2010, with two others accepting the possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[junk science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://rated.com/dir/Society/Issues/Environment/Opposing_Views/Junk_Science&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the corruption of the scientific method to advance other, often political, goals (such as [[Global Warming]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|jury nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|the power of a jury to overrule the law and acquit an ostensibly guilty defendant; the power was established in the colonies in 1735 in the trial of [[John Peter Zenger]], but this term was first used in state court by Pfeuffer v. Haas, 55 S.W.2d 111 (Tex. Civ. App. 1932) and in federal court by ''Skidmore v. Baltimore &amp;amp; O. R. Co.'', 167 F.2d 54 (2nd Cir. 1948)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kiss of death&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|from Judas's betrayal of Jesus with a kiss, Mark 14:44-4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kowtow&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|obsequious, unthinking obedience to someone or something, used especially in the context of dictatorships and liberal belief systems&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kremlinology&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the otherwise indecipherable behavior of the government of the [[communist]] [[Soviet Union]]. Refers to the Kremlin, the traditional seat of Russian government (Soviet or not). &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|labor camp&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|forced work prison&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|laissez-faire&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing governmental interference in economic affairs beyond what is minimally necessary&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lame duck&lt;br /&gt;
|1761&lt;br /&gt;
|one falling being in achievement, especially a public official whose power is limited because his term in office is set to expire without possibility of reelection.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lamestream media&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Bernie Goldberg to describe the clueless [[Mainstream media]] that repeat superficial, discredited liberal claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|landslide&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|In the political sense, an overwhelming election victory. A clear, democratic expression of popular will.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leadership&lt;br /&gt;
|1821&lt;br /&gt;
|an ability and willingness to lead, often by example&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leftism&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|principles and doctrine of leftists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leverage&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|life vest&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-life invention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|local&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This date refers to its first usage as a ''noun'', which is an estimate of its adoption as a concept.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|common usage: &amp;quot;all politics is local&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|locomotive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|a great engine of economic growth during the [[Industrial Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lone wolf&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who prefers to work, act, or live alone,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lone%20wolf Lone wolf, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; synonymous with self-sufficiency&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|loose cannon&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|an undisciplined person or program that dangerously lacks forethought; used in mid-November 1976 to describe $11 billion in unspent appropriations by the Ford Administration:  &amp;quot;'That money,' says Arnold Packer, a senior Senate Budget Committee economist who is helping Carter draw up his shadow budget, 'is like a loose cannon rolling around the deck' because a sudden reappearance of the funds could be inflationary.&amp;quot; (''BusinessWeek'')&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lunatic fringe&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by U.S. President [[Theodore Roosevelt]] to describe members of eccentric, radical or extremist groups&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=lunatic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|machismo&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|a word never used favorably by feminists!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|man-hater&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was during the epic struggle -- and defeat -- of the so-called [[Equal Rights Amendment]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|William Safire wrote in the ''New York Times'' in 1983, &amp;quot;Misandry, from the Greek misandros for 'hating men,' is in the 1961 Merriam-Webster New International Dictionary, and the Oxford Dictionary Supplement traces it to 1946.  The word is pronounced as 'Ms. Andry,' but I wonder why we need the Greek word for it. What's wrong with good, old-fashioned man-hater?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sunday, Oct. 30, 1983, Section 6, Page 12, Column 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|make-work&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|inefficient or useless activity that has the false appearance of being productive; a favorite endeavor of liberals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|manifest destiny&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|Providential design over future events, which originated in the context of expanding the United States to the Pacific Ocean&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the view of life that physical matter is all that exists; as an &amp;quot;ism&amp;quot;, the term criticizes such view&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|melting pot&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|requires &amp;quot;social and cultural assimilation&amp;quot; for successful immigration&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster dictionary (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[meritocracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[microeconomics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the economics of the individual person or business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|close-minded point-of-view, typically in adherence to a liberal falsehood and often to the exclusion of Christ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missile defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as part of [[SDI]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1625&lt;br /&gt;
|someone sent on a mission, typically a religious mission&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|mobocracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1754&lt;br /&gt;
|rule by a mob, as at Wikipedia&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|monogamy&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|this has the same date of origin as &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot;, and that may not be a coincidence!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moonlighting&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|working more than a full-time job in order to be as productive as possible; the [[work ethic]] at its best&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|motivation&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe the word did not exist before 1873?!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckety–muck&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for an arrogant person who holds a title or position considered to be important by others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckraker&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who searches out and publicly exposes [[deceit]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/muckraker Merriam-Webster - Muckraker]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Murphy's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|if something can go wrong, then it will go wrong: this was a conservative insight by an engineer Edward Murphy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muscle car&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|placing a powerful engine in a classic two-door car for highly efficient performance; also celebrate masculine style against erosion by feminism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|myopic&lt;br /&gt;
|1752&lt;br /&gt;
|originally a term in optometry, 1990's used to describe liberals' lack of foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|name-dropping&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|a term critical of the [[liberal]] practice of seeking to impress others by casually mentioning personal association with prominent people, despite its lack of relevance to the conversation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nanny state&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Under the New Economic Policy, [the new French Prime Minister Raymond] Barre has made it clear that industrial lame ducks can no longer count on the generosity of Nanny i.e. the state - for bailing out.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leo Ryan, &amp;quot;Economy Shored up: France's new surge of liberalism,&amp;quot; The Globe and Mail (Canada) (Aug. 1, 1978)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Note how two powerful new conservative terms led to a third here!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|negativism&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|mental attitude that tends that is skeptical about almost everything, except one's own views&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|newspeak&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|political or media expressions using circumlocution and euphemisms to disguise or distract from the truth; first coined by [[George Orwell]] in ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-justiciable&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Used by the state attorneys for West Virginia (including Philip Steptoe, founder of Steptoe &amp;amp; Johnson) in ''Pennsylvania v. West Virginia'', 262 U.S. 553 (1923):  &amp;quot;It is not the 'subject of judicial cognizance,' Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 15; Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S 1, 15; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, or 'susceptible of judicial solution.' Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S. 1, 18, 22; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, 234.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a difficult issue that the courts should not attempt to resolve, often because it is too political in nature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-locality&lt;br /&gt;
|1920s&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action at a distance]] at the atomic level; even though proven, it is still opposed by those who believe in [[relativity]] and still not recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&lt;br /&gt;
|assertion of authority by a State against encroachment by the federal government, in defense of liberty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Old Glory&lt;br /&gt;
|1862&lt;br /&gt;
|the ''United States of America'' flag, Stars &amp;amp; Stripes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-size-fits-all&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Was there an earlier conservative use?  Frank Zappa's album cover in the 1970s does not count!&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Lee Wishing, director of communications for conservative [[Grove City College]], in criticism of how the government administers student loans: &amp;quot;Unfortunately, with government programs, it's one size fits all.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/1996/dec96/er-dec96.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The 2008 Republican platform states, &amp;quot;We reject a one-size-fits-all approach and support parental options, including home schooling, and local innovations such as schools or classes for boys only or for girls only and alternative and innovative school schedules.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-trick pony&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|a person or group that relies repeatedly on the same gimmick, as in &amp;quot;the media are a one-trick pony in their criticism of [[Rand Paul]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|open-minded&lt;br /&gt;
|1828&lt;br /&gt;
|see [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[opportunity cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|optimism&lt;br /&gt;
|1759&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|originalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|taken from original intent, The belief that the United States Constitution should be interpreted in the way the authors originally intended it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Orwellian&lt;br /&gt;
|1960s&lt;br /&gt;
|terminology or style that advances the power of big government but is hurtful or nonsensical&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ntu.org/main/press.php?PressID=604&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ostensibly&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|having an outward appearance that may not reflect the underlying truth; good potential use is Luke 3:23 in describing Jesus as the son of Joseph&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|outflank&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|to move swiftly around an opponent, a military tactic mastered by [[conservative]] [[General]] [[George Patton]] to crush the [[Germans]] in [[World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|parenting&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|children raising&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Parkinson's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how bureaucracies expand regardless of the productivity, and how inefficient work expands to fill the time available for its completion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[patent troll]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|a company that obtains or buys up patents for the sole purpose of asserting infringement claims, and without any intention of actually manufacturing the invention; the term was first coined by Peter Detkin, in-house counsel to Intel&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|patriotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pavlovian&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a conditioned, automatic and unthinking response to a signal; it has been used twice by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justices. &amp;quot;It is well established that this Court does not, or at least should not, respond in Pavlovian fashion to confessions of error by the [[Solicitor General]].&amp;quot;  ''De Marco v. United States'', 415 U.S. 449, 451 (1974) ([[Rehnquist]], J., dissenting); &amp;quot;'[[Incorporation doctrine|Incorporation]]' has become so Pavlovian that my Brother BLACK barely mentions the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] in the course of an 11-page opinion dealing with the procedural rule the State of [[Florida]] has adopted for cases tried in Florida courts under Florida's criminal laws.&amp;quot; '' Williams v. Fla.'', 399 U.S. 78, 144 (1970) ([[Potter Stewart|Stewart]], J., dissenting and concurring).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|perpetual war&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|Coined by historian Charles A. Beard,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles A. Beard is best known for interpreting the Constitution as being primarily motivated by economic interests.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it has been used most recently by [[Ann Coulter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[personhood]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/personhood Personhood] Dictionary.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|Inherent rights guaranteed to all human beings from the beginning of their biological development, including the pre-born, partially born. Also, the state or fact of being a person.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Philadelphia&lt;br /&gt;
|1682&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[William Penn]] and meaning &amp;quot;city of brotherly love,&amp;quot; the concept captures the &amp;quot;[[best of the public]]&amp;quot; approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[phonics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1684&lt;br /&gt;
|conservatives have long championed phonics to promote literacy, Bible-reading, and informed voters; liberals take the opposite position&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|phony&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This surprisingly recent origin appears to be derived from a British confidence game.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|needed to address [[liberal deceit]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|plasticity&lt;br /&gt;
|1783&lt;br /&gt;
|having a plastic quality that conforms to molding or pressure; in pejorative usage, someone who easily conforms to [[peer pressure]] or [[liberal]] falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|poetic justice&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&lt;br /&gt;
|when virtue is reward and/or wrongdoing is punished in an indirect or unexpected way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|political machine&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for local and typically Democratic power structures that prevent outsiders from winning elections; first used by George Washington Plunkitt to criticize the Tammany Hall machine for which he served&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[politically correct]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|This term originated among radicals at the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] to enforce radical orthodoxy, but immediately flipped in usage to become a term of mockery of radicals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For an early different usage of the word, see 1793 J. WILSON in U.S. Rep. (U.S. Supreme Court) 2 (1798) 462 Sentiments and expressions of this inaccurate kind prevail in our..language... ‘The United States’, instead of the ‘People of the United States’, is the toast given. This is not politically correct.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The term may have come from Chairman Mao in 1936.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|politicize&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|seeking political gain at the expense of truth or quality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Merriam-Webster definition (1994 ed.) is incomplete and unclear: &amp;quot;to give a political tone or character to&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[post-abortive]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|the unexpected trauma and physical harm -- which can worsen over time -- that is experienced by a woman after having an [[abortion]]; coined by Dr. Kaye Cash in an editorial describing what she learned during a 365-mile walk in southeast Arkansas to speak with the public about abortion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Editorial by Kaye Cash, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Little Rock, AR), October 23, 1986.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|potential&lt;br /&gt;
|1817&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Usage here refers to &amp;quot;promise&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;possibility&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pothead&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who smokes marijuana and doesn't realize how it destroys people&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[price discrimination]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|charging different prices for the exact same service or good; first coined by the British economist (and critic of [[John Maynard Keynes]]) Arthur Cecil Pigou in ''The Economics of Welfare''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|prioritize&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|to recognize that some goals and activities are more important than others, and then focus accordingly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|privatize&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|to return a business or enterprise from state to private control; to de-nationalize.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proactive&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Procrustean&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative description of the one-size-fits-all mentality, which disregards individual differences&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productive&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|1810&lt;br /&gt;
|the gap of about 200 years between the creation of &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;productivity&amp;quot; is astounding&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[pro-life]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1960&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|property right&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|provocateur&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who spends more time causing unproductive conflicts rather than advancing knowledge, accomplishing legitimate goals, or helping anyone&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|quantify&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|race card&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is the date of its widespread familiarity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Playing the race card&amp;quot; consists of relying on racial emotions or charges of racism in order to overcome the truth and logic in politics, legal proceedings, or otherwise; this term became familiar in the criticism of the defense and acquittal of O.J. Simpson for the murder of his ex-wife and her friend.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rapture&lt;br /&gt;
|1629&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritual ecstasy[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=rapture]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[recidivism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1886&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency for people lacking in [[faith]] and determination to revert to prior patterns of harmful behavior, such as repeat criminal offenders&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|recuse&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|self-removal by a decision-maker (especially a judge) because of possible bias with respect to the pending issue&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|red tape&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive bureaucracy and procedural complexity which frustrate meaningful activity and progress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|refudiate&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|combination of ''refute'' and ''repudiate'', as coined by [[Sarah Palin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[relativism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|the view that ethical truths are not absolute, but depend on the person or group that holds them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[responsibility]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1737&lt;br /&gt;
|1787 HAMILTON Federalist No. 63 II. 193 Responsibility in order to be reasonable must be limited to objects within the power of the responsible party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reverse discrimination&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|the use of quotas or affirmative action to use race or gender to discriminate against a better qualified person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|revisionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term, now obscure, refers to a Marxist movement that preferred evolutionary rather than revolutionary change.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|distortions of history to promote liberal bias&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|riot act&lt;br /&gt;
|1715&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Its colloquial use, as in &amp;quot;read them the riot act,&amp;quot; began in 1819.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the Riot Act was a law passed in England in 1715 to authorize officials to disperse riots&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|run of the mill&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|meaning &amp;quot;merely average, commonplace,&amp;quot; the term is critical of a failure to strive for excellence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sacred cow&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a person or idea, typically liberal, that becomes immune from criticism because of its political usefulness rather than its truthfulness, as in the theories of [[evolution]] and [[relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scapegoating&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|a term criticizing how people, particularly liberals, deflect accountability and blame from themselves to others; inspired by Leviticus 16:8.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|salutary neglect&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by the [[conservative]] [[Edmund Burke]] in his 1775 speech to the British [[House of Commons]] entitled &amp;quot;On Moving His Resolutions for Conciliation with the Colonies&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|school choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by Milton Friedman in his book, ''Free to Choose'' &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[scientific fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|a coordinated effort by a group of scientists to enforce a certain point of view upon others.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[secularism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-55&lt;br /&gt;
|attempts to educate, particularly through [[public school]], without including [[faith]] or even acknowledgment of [[God]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Segway&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|Dean Kamen's trademark spelling of &amp;quot;segue&amp;quot; for use of Yankee Ingenuity to improve efficiency, to refer to a form of battery-powered transportation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[self-defense]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1651&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-destruct&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|often the tragic result of liberal falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Discipline|self-discipline]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-preservation&lt;br /&gt;
|1614&lt;br /&gt;
|preservation of oneself from destruction or harm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-reliant&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|separation of powers&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the fundamental insight underlying the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|skullduggery&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|underhanded or unscrupulous behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|slippery slope&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|term has been widely used for decades to expose the fallacy of &amp;quot;it doesn't hurt to try&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|something intended to disguise or draw attention away from an often embarrassing or unpleasant issue. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/smoke%20and%20mirrors Smoke and Mirrors, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Widely used during the 1990s to describe [[Bill Clinton]]'s political strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoking gun&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|a law-and-order term, &amp;quot;smoking gun&amp;quot; was first used as figurative term in a reported judicial decision in ''Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp.'', 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12775 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 1975), and many literal uses of the term in court decisions before that!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soccer mom&lt;br /&gt;
|1987&lt;br /&gt;
|a mother who devotes herself to her children's activities and a significant voting bloc or demographic group&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[socialist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who advocates government control over the economy, and particularly state control of the means of production&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|social justice rhetoric&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|Language and rhetorical ploys equating equality of outcome with justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spend-and-tax&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/02/morning-bell-the-obama-tax-and-spend-economy-is-here/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a variation on &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; (see below), &amp;quot;spend-and-tax&amp;quot; consists of spending the money first and then trying to justify raising taxes based on the deficit created by the spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spin doctor&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|someone ensuring that others interpret an event from a particular point of view.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/world/asia/22policy.html?_r=2 General Petraeus describes Axelrod by Bob Woodward]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spot-on&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|precisely correct, as in a prediction or in overcoming imprecision in a challenging task; its origin is from the military &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stalking horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1788&lt;br /&gt;
|a candidate or issue that serves to increase the chances that ''another'' will win, as in &amp;quot;antifederalists attempted to win elections by using 'the stalking horse of amendments.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Centinel'', 1788 (quoted in ''The Federalist party in Massachusetts to the year 1800'', By Anson Ely Morse).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[statism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|advocates for centralized government and government ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straightforward&lt;br /&gt;
|1806&lt;br /&gt;
|something liberals are not&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straw man&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|an imaginary argument or example set up for the purpose of easily knocking down, while distracting from valid arguments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Stupaked&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|hurt by someone who reassured everyone he would do the right thing, but then switched at the last minute to do the opposite (refers especially to [[abortion betrayal]]s)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Columnist Kathleen Parker is credited with first coining this term.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|supply-side&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|the economic theory that reducing taxes expands economic activity by encouraging greater earnings and investments; proven successful during the Reagan Administration in the 1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|takeover&lt;br /&gt;
|1917&lt;br /&gt;
|as in the takeover of government by the communist revolution in that year&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tax-and-spend&lt;br /&gt;
|1937 &lt;br /&gt;
|not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster, it is included in dictionary.com and it means the liberal policy of raising taxes and increasing government spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|taxpayer&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|the word highlights who is really paying for things&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[term limits]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe this is not in the dictionary yet? Merriam-Webster omits it, but dictionary.com has it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/term+limit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|terrorism&lt;br /&gt;
|1795&lt;br /&gt;
|this was during the French Revolution&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[textualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|first used by Justice [[Robert Jackson]] in his influential concurrence in ''[[Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer]]'', 343 U.S. 579 (1952), it now describes the legal philosophy of Justice [[Antonin Scalia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[think tank]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1940s&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in [[Britain]] to describe intelligence organizations that helped the military, think tanks became part of the rise of conservatism in the 1970s and 1980s; is ''Conservapedia'' the think tank of the future?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|top-notch&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest quality, which requires respect for merit to recognize&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|term which identifies the similarities of fascist and communist regimes and ideologies and urges resistance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tour de force&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|a feat of skill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trademark&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|extends the concept of private property to the marks used by business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalist&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;adherence to the doctrines or practices of a tradition...the beliefs of those opposed to modernism, liberalism, or radicalism&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/traditionalist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transaction cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|Economist [[Ronald Coase]] won a [[Nobel Prize]] for this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transistor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|named by John R. Pierce and developed at the [[conservative]] [[Bell Labs]], this invention epitomized Yankee ingenuity; Pierce was a critic of claims of [[artificial intelligence]] and was the future developer of [[Telstar]], a precursor to the [[Strategic Defense Initiative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tree huggers&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|still not recognized by the dictionary, this term criticizes extreme environmentalists, but they proudly use the term also to describe what they literally do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trivia&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|insignificant detail, which can sometimes obscure what is important and distract people from the Bible; liberal [[Wikipedia]] is filled with trivial junk&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Trojan horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1837&lt;br /&gt;
|describes a type of liberal [[deceit]]:  subversion from within&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trust but verify&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as the approach to use towards communist [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ugly duckling&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|an unpromising appearance but often with great unseen potential&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ultra vires&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|beyond the authority, especially of a government or corporate official&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unborn child&lt;br /&gt;
|1791&lt;br /&gt;
|the rights of the unborn child have been recognized in English law since the 1600s, but the specific term &amp;quot;unborn child&amp;quot; itself may have been first used by an attorney arguing before the New Jersey Supreme Court in ''Den v. Sparks'', 1 N.J.L. 67 (Sup. Ct. 1791)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underdog&lt;br /&gt;
|1887&lt;br /&gt;
|[[David]] v. [[Goliath]], [[Cinderella]], [[best of the public]], etc.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[underemployed]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1908&lt;br /&gt;
|having less than full-time or suitable employment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unscripted&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|speaking sincerely without parroting a script; &amp;quot;[[Rand Paul]] and [[Chris Christie]] are effective because, unlike [[Obama]], they are unscripted.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vandalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&lt;br /&gt;
|malicious destruction of someone else's property&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|veracity&lt;br /&gt;
|1623&lt;br /&gt;
|devotion to truthfulness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vet&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2199254/?from=rss&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a verb meaning to screen for flaws&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[victimization]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|volunteer&lt;br /&gt;
|1618&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who freely offers to help&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wannabe&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a word that criticizes liberal [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|War on Terror&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|no listing at Merriam-Webster February 2, 2009 Obama ends use of the conservative lexicon. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pewforum.org/news/display.php?NewsID=17455 Obama administration drops 'war on terror' phrase] Pew Forum, February 2, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|washed-up&lt;br /&gt;
|1928&lt;br /&gt;
|no longer productive, as in &amp;quot;the washed-up liberal professor has not contributed anything to his field in 30 years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|waterloo&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|a final defeat or setback, coined merely one year after the [[English]] defeated [[Napoleon]] at the [[Battle of Waterloo]]; there has never been a &amp;quot;waterloo&amp;quot; for [[Christianity]] or [[conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wildcatter&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-energy term that describes someone who drills for oil in fields not known to have oil&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|word poverty&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/summer2001/lang_gap_moats.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President [[George W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work (physical sense)&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|a physical measure&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;force times distance&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of effort used to increase energy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work ethic&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|a habit of working as a moral good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|worldview&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|a comprehensive way of looking at life and the world; sometimes used to criticize a liberal's irrational belief system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Yankee&lt;br /&gt;
|1758&lt;br /&gt;
|Inhabitants of the United States&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|yellow journalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice, started by newspaper publishers Joseph Pulitzer and his rival William Randolph Hearst, of sensationalizing and biasing newspaper headlines and articles in order to influence public opinion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative Words Not Yet Recognized by the Dictionary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thousand new words are developed in English each year.  Here is a growing list of conservative concepts, each of which is not yet defined by a single word or two.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Not Yet Recognized Terms&lt;br /&gt;
!Suggestions&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pre-9/11 thinking&lt;br /&gt;
|9/10 mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|terror is jurisdiction of the courts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anti-family&lt;br /&gt;
|tradition opposer, familiopathic&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|causing harm by spreading falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|deceit&lt;br /&gt;
|e.g., denying or concealing disease and infertility caused by promiscuity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Constitutional values&lt;br /&gt;
|adherence to righteousness as set forth by the [[Founding Fathers]]&lt;br /&gt;
|principles set in the Declaration&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cradle to grave &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/spanish/from%20cradle%20to%20grave cradle to grave- no entry found] Merriam-Websters&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|sanctity of life, conception to natural death&lt;br /&gt;
|pro-life stance, also can mean socialist entitlement programs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cut and run&lt;br /&gt;
|surrender advocates&lt;br /&gt;
|when the going gets tough, run away from the problem&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deliberate ignorance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|mind-locked, self-centered pride obscuring the truth&lt;br /&gt;
|the term exists; the dictionary does not yet include it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|denial that [[Hell]] exists&lt;br /&gt;
|Hell-denier? Antinfernal? (Should be &amp;quot;antihadessic&amp;quot; so as not to mix Hellenate and Latinate roots)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[abstinence denial|denier of the effectiveness of abstinence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|abstinence-denier?&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|drive-by media&lt;br /&gt;
|partisan slander&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal mainstream media assault on the GOP or conservative principles, deceitful attacks for opposing viewpoints&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[earmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|spending on specific projects at the request of a particular congressman, and without meaningful examination by others voting on it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|easily amused by [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|dolophile&lt;br /&gt;
|from Greek/Latin root ''dolo-'' meaning guile, deceit, deception [http://www.wordinfo.info/words/index/info/view_unit/664]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|family-friendly&lt;br /&gt;
|wholesome&lt;br /&gt;
|describes TV programming, websites, social events that are not offensive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hatred of one's country, refusal to recognize the good elements of it, or unreasonably critical of it&lt;br /&gt;
|misopatria, misopatrist&lt;br /&gt;
|From Greek ''misein'', to hate, and Latin ''patria'', nation or homeland&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heavenly body&lt;br /&gt;
|celestial body&lt;br /&gt;
|natural objects visible in the sky&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hellbound&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|recognized by over 1.3 million sites in a Google search and no substitute term is available, yet dictionaries refuse to recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hoax and Chains&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Keynesian economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|a phonetic play on the rhetoric slogan of Hope and Change. Hope replaced by unemployment and Change represents obsessive tax burdens. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hoax plant&lt;br /&gt;
|fake townhall, kkk teaparty&lt;br /&gt;
|a term to describe a deceitful method of placing an operative that appears to be part of a group in order to push an agenda or to make a competing agenda look ridiculous. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Hollywood values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|West Coast Hedonism &lt;br /&gt;
|Over 800,000 results on Google, not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Illegal Alien|illegal alien]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|widely used in court decisions and political discourse for years, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it is as a term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|infotainment&lt;br /&gt;
|tabloid news, dramacast&lt;br /&gt;
|mainstream media presents drama fluff stories as news, e.g. 20/20 - Datelin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[limited government]]&lt;br /&gt;
|we the people democracy&lt;br /&gt;
|first testament to this was the [[U.S. Constitution]], defining [[Reagan]]s presidency, can't be found in Merriam-Websters. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/limited%20government Limited government - Not found] Merriam-Webster's&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[limousine liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
|hypocrite&lt;br /&gt;
|rich promoting causes which they themselves don't adhere to&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|manufactured outrage&lt;br /&gt;
|fake tears &lt;br /&gt;
|liberal politicians and the liberal media's method of stroking anger to pursue an agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|media vigilantism&lt;br /&gt;
|soviet-style censorship&lt;br /&gt;
|media's public campaign to demonize dissent against people or groups, such as [[Juan Williams]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|merit pay&lt;br /&gt;
|performance bonus&lt;br /&gt;
|Doing your job better with perks as a reward. The typical liberal union teacher avoids merit pay at all costs, self before students. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[militant gays]]&lt;br /&gt;
|intimidating homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|modern idolatry&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;media idolatry&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;money idolatry&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;celebrity idolatry&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|idolatry conjures images of golden calves, and a modern version is needed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moral fabric&lt;br /&gt;
|domestic tranquility&lt;br /&gt;
|ethics and virtues united for the common good of all&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|morally bankrupt&lt;br /&gt;
|[[atheism]], self-void  &lt;br /&gt;
|ethically and spiritually challenged souls&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|narrative hysteria&lt;br /&gt;
|delusional finger-pointing&lt;br /&gt;
|a frantic attempt to capitalize on calamity by casting their opponents as somehow responsible for an act of madness and evil&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|opposite of [[global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|regional warming&lt;br /&gt;
|the North pole shrinks as the South pole increases&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|opposite of [[materialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritualism and idealism have been its philosophical opposites, historically&lt;br /&gt;
|[[dualism]] has been suggested, but it is not the ''opposite'' of [[materialism]]; &amp;quot;spiritualism&amp;quot; is not a common term and is the &amp;quot;opposite&amp;quot; of materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[peer pressure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|used in titles to professional journal articles as early as 1994&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe that isn't recognized by Merriam-Webster?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proven wrong, a refusal to admit it&lt;br /&gt;
|mulism; heel-digger?&lt;br /&gt;
|cf. mulish. This refusal is what promoted the [[Parable of the Good Samaritan]]. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|religious right&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian conservatives&lt;br /&gt;
|religion in America almost exclusively a conservative institution, no religious left term in existence.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reward failure&lt;br /&gt;
|TARP &lt;br /&gt;
|too big to fail, bailout bankrupt, mismanagement subsidized &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rewrite history &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/rewrite%20history  rewrite history not found, Merriam-Websters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deceit]], mislead &lt;br /&gt;
|Commonly used term describing liberal deceit to hide, defraud others about factual history.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rogue states&lt;br /&gt;
|rogue nations&lt;br /&gt;
|nations defying international law, only rogue is listed in Merriman-Websters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|runaway jury&lt;br /&gt;
|The term has existed for decades, but Merriam-Webster has not recognized it yet.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rule of Law&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[schlockumentary]]&lt;br /&gt;
|propaganda film&lt;br /&gt;
|documentary films based on falsehoods and half-truths&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[Second generation atheist|second-generation atheist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|cradle atheist&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|selective outrage&lt;br /&gt;
|partisan hypocrisy, bipolar&lt;br /&gt;
|to be against something to further a cause and reject, stay silent, ignore or discount something similar. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smear merchant&lt;br /&gt;
|serial slander&lt;br /&gt;
|to constantly hurl degrading or false accusations against others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|strict constructionism&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|an important term for over 200 years to describe adherence to the text of the Constitution, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Conservative| Traditional Values]]&lt;br /&gt;
| principles of Conservatism&lt;br /&gt;
|much the same as family values but incorporating all aspects society; family, religion, self-sufficiency, the truth, hard work. Only listed in Merriam-Websters to describe what Nilihism is against. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|true emergency&lt;br /&gt;
|life support&lt;br /&gt;
|meaning a high probability of serious injury or death to an individual or property. Emergency has been watered down, e.g. to be locked out of one's car.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Unaffected by, or impervious to, the media&lt;br /&gt;
|mediaproof&lt;br /&gt;
|cf. bulletproof. ''Once John became aware of the extent of [[liberal deceit]], he set about mediaproofing his mind''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Liberal Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New liberal words often have deceptive, or nonsensical, meanings.  Here are some new words created by liberals to combat [[conservatism]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!New Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[agnosticism|agnostic]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who claims to not know whether [[God]] exists but still lives like an [[atheist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[atheism|atheist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1571&lt;br /&gt;
|useful and often deceptive alternative name for an anti-Christian&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Big Bang theory|big bang]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|term invented by the leading [[British]] physicist Sir [[Fred Hoyle]] to ''mock'' this suggestion of how the universe was formed, but later accepted as a serious term rather than mockery;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Compare this migration with that of &amp;quot;politically correct,&amp;quot; which started out as a serious term but then adopted a sense of mockery&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it's liberal because it trivializes the beauty and the [[faith]] of the moment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bilingual education&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism describing a costly and hurtful program that hinders the learning of English by foreign-born children in American [[public school]]s, which hurts their future opportunities&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[carbon footprint]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/carbon%20footprint&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|this term indicates an individual human's effect on the environment by production of carbon dioxide &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|chairperson&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&lt;br /&gt;
|even Alice Sturgis, the leading parliamentarian of the 20th century, rejected this cumbersome form of political correctness.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|check-off&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&lt;br /&gt;
|automatic deduction of union dues by the employer from the employee's paycheck, so he has no choice&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[class warfare]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|first entered the political lexicon primarily as an attack by liberals against conservatives. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20030115.html The art of &amp;quot;class warfare&amp;quot;], Ben Fritz, Spinsanity.org, January 15, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|compassionate-care clinics&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|a term describe pot-shops that dispense medical marijuana &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://money.cnn.com/2009/09/11/magazines/fortune/medical_marijuana_legalizing.fortune/?postversion=2009091116 How marijuana became legal, CNN, September 11, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|compassion fatigue&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals, driven by materialistic self-interest, are likely to suffer from this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[condescension]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1647&lt;br /&gt;
|treating another person as though they are inferior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[creationism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1880&lt;br /&gt;
|like most &amp;quot;isms&amp;quot;, creationism is a derogatory term coined preferred most by opponents of it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Dark Ages]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1730&lt;br /&gt;
|a term coined in the so-called [[enlightenment]] to disparage the period between the fall of the [[Roman Empire]] and c.1000, when the Christian faith, and its learning and culture, spread across Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Dead white males|dead white males]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|a disparaging term used of significant figures from previous generations by those who wish to undermine [[Cultural Literacy|cultural literacy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deconstruction&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of interpretation of texts that looks beyond the plain meaning of the text in order to infer or accuse the writers of social bias&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|diva&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|modern use to describe female Hollywood/media personalities&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Détente|detente]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism referring to pacifist policy re. the Soviet Union&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|displaced foreign traveler &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2010/07/bureaucrats-now.html Bureaucrats Now Call Illegal Aliens &amp;quot;Displaced Foreign Travelers&amp;quot;, Moonbattery.com, July 21, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|another politically correct term for [[illegal alien]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|distributive justice&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|a term used to redefine socialist abridgment of rights as &amp;quot;just&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|divided government&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term used by liberals to insist on control of all of government, as when they used the term to urge the election of the Democrat [[Jimmy Carter]] to work with the Democratic-controlled Congress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[enlightenment]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1669&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Environmentalist|environmentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|a mixture of [[pseudoscience]] and neo-[[paganism]] used to justify the imposition of [[socialist]]ic controls.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[exclusionary rule]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&lt;br /&gt;
|an invented rule that requires censoring and withholding from the jury certain incriminating evidence about a criminal defendant, simply based on how the evidence was obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[family planning]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|planning intended to determine the number and spacing of one's children through birth control &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://mw1.m-w.com/dictionary/family%20planning Family Planning, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|freethinker&lt;br /&gt;
|1692&lt;br /&gt;
|the euphemism &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; hides the hostility towards faith, which is not free&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[fundamentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;a movement in 20th century Protestantism emphasizing the literally interpreted Bible as fundamental to Christian life and teaching&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fundamentalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; From a series of pamphlets called &amp;quot;The Fundamentals&amp;quot; which outlined the movement.  Perjorative usage started when the liberal [[Harry Emerson Fosdick]] began using the term in a straw man attack against [[Conservative Christianity]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[feminism]]   &lt;br /&gt;
|1895   &lt;br /&gt;
|notionally, &amp;quot;the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes&amp;quot;; in reality, the attempt to destroy traditional family, societal and religious values by erasing or undermining natural gender differences.  &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[gay rights]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|the movement for civil rights for homosexuals&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|glass ceiling&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|the notion that an invisible barrier prevents women and ethnic minorities from reaching high office; an excuse for [[feminist]]s and others to demand [[affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|the baseless [[environmentalist]] mantra that the earth's temperature is rising, and that human intervention is the cause.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[goth]]&lt;br /&gt;
|?&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;a style of rock music, noted especially for somber or ethereal tones and lugubrious lyrics&amp;quot;, or someone who performs or listens to this style of music.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com, ''goth'' [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/goth]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Goths often &amp;quot;dress in black with heavy jewelry&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com, ''goth rock'' [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/goth%20rock]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The term is taken from the name of &amp;quot;a Germanic people who invaded the Roman Empire in the early centuries of the Christian era&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com, ''goth'' [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/goth]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gun control&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism for restricting the right to keep and bear arms &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[homophobia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Liberals to describe a failure to subscribe 100% to the [[homosexual agenda]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[humanism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1808 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newhumanist.org.uk/1740&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[human security]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|A vague [[socialist]] concept of &amp;quot;freedom from want&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;freedom from fear' championed by FDR, latter by the UN. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[illegal war]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1960's&lt;br /&gt;
|A war not authorized by the United Nations. Prior to the UN, America's involvement in WWI and the U.S. declaring war on Germany in WWII can be considered an illegal war by liberals. America was never attacked.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[imperialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1851&lt;br /&gt;
|a clever term later used by liberals to interfere with Christian missionaries and stopping anti-Christian tyranny&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[isolationism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term that is critical of American politicians putting America first in priorities&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Keynesianism&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|advocacy of 'tax and spend' policies as elaborated by the economist [[John Maynard Keynes]]; a [[euphemism]] for back-door [[Socialism]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|landmark decision&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|a major court decision, used to promote the idea that values are dictated by liberal elites&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Living Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|a continually evolving Constitution (first used by presidential candidate Al Gore, title of a 1936 book by Howard McBain)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|main squeeze&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|one's romantic partner, typically in an unmarried relationship&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|McCarthyism&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|originally, investigations by Sen. Joe McCarthy of Communists working in sensitive USA government jobs. Later, it more broadly refers to holding radical leftists accountable for their beliefs and loyalties.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[metrosexual]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|fashion and glamour man&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moderate&lt;br /&gt;
|late 1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|the original term dates from the French Revolution, but its meaning today is a euphemism for someone who favors abortion and/or supports censorship of Christianity in some ways.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[moving the goalposts]]&lt;br /&gt;
|late 1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|a sports analogy designed to avoid answering a logical follow-up question; this is a favorite term of evolutionists to avoid addressing obvious deficiencies in their theory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nationalize&lt;br /&gt;
|1800&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism for the government taking over ownership and control of a large company or entire industry, as in socialism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|natural selection&lt;br /&gt;
|1857&lt;br /&gt;
|a misleading and euphemistic term for the theory that genetic advantages and conflict dictate survival&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Nihilism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1817&lt;br /&gt;
|a rejection of the values system, independently anarchist from society norms.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[population control]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|the issue of population dates back to Confucius. Liberals promoted the term after the book The Population Bomb by Paul R. Ehrlich&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[pro-choice]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism for insisting on taxpayer-funded [[abortion]]; people who claim to be pro-choice typically oppose ''informed'' choice, which makes the &amp;quot;choice&amp;quot; meaningless&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[progressivism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1892&lt;br /&gt;
|the progressive movement was not entirely liberal; it was started by a Republican and shared some goals with conservatives, and still does&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[psychoanalysis]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1906&lt;br /&gt;
|contributed to de-spiritualization of human beings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|public option&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|obfuscate rewording of government control &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[quote mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
|non-existent&lt;br /&gt;
|a term used by [[evolutionists]] to describe taking quotes out of context in order to damage the position of the quoted party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reproductive health&lt;br /&gt;
|1994 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;defined by the United Nations (UN) in 1994 at the Cairo International Conference&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|abortion supporters jargon for rights/justice for pregnant women, no rights/justice for the child.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Sexual Discrimination|sexism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|That which is practiced by those who do not give total support to [[feminism]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|shovel-ready &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://skylineviews.typepad.com/skyline_views/2009/04/is-it-time-to-add-shovelready-to-the-dictionary.html Is it time to add shovel-ready to the dictionary? Skyline Views, April 24, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|jobs and people ready to work if funded&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|situation ethics&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|a euphemism for denying fixed ethical standards&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stimulus packages&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|used by government(s) to be perceived as taking unprecedented measures to stimulate aggregate economic demand; during a crisis on economic growth and private jobs, liberal government entities are known to deceptively take advantage of its subject in the form of &amp;quot;stimulus packages,&amp;quot; as an opportunity to pursue policies that further social and environmental agendas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/12/62/42555546.pdf For a stronger, cleaner, ''fairer'' world economy], ''Organisation For Economic Co-Operation and Development'' (OECD), 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|strict liability&lt;br /&gt;
|1869&lt;br /&gt;
|court-imposed liability even when there is no evidence of any fault by the defendant&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sustainability&lt;br /&gt;
|1727&lt;br /&gt;
|[[environmentalism|environmentalist]] buzzword&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Swift-Boating&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|allegations of unfair campaign tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|transforming society&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Obama, Rahm and Axelrod use this term. It dates to [[Saul Alinsky]] and Chicago politics. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://marklevinshow.com/sectional.asp?id=32930# Mark Levin Show, July 7, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|transnationalist&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh in a 2006 law review article:  &amp;quot;The transnationalists view domestic courts as having a critical role to play in domesticating international law into U.S. law ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Penn State Law Review (2006).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|undocumented immigrant&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|a [[politically correct]] replacement for illegal alien.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unfair&lt;br /&gt;
|1700&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|union shop&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Unitarian]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1687&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|VIP&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|Very Important Person, a person with special privileges, [[elitism]]. Unknown to liberals, everyone is very important to God.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|will to power&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Nietzsche]]'s concept of the drive of a superman to perfect himself by exercising creative power; it didn't catch on&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|woman's rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1833&lt;br /&gt;
|women equal to men; the defining movement to justify aborting babies in the 20th century&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rate of Generation of Liberal Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rate of generation of liberal terms is increasing, but not with the enduring value of the conservative terms and not with their geometric rate of increase.  A remarkably high percentage of new liberal terms originated in the 1960s, suggesting that new liberal terms arise in a sporadic manner heavily influenced by culture:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Century&lt;br /&gt;
!# New Liberal Terms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1600s&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1700s&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|11&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|35 (10 in the 1960s)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terms Difficult to Classify ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These new terms are difficult to classify:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[affirmative action|affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|first used in [http://www.thecre.com/fedlaw/legal6/eo10925.htm JFK's Executive Order 10925] in 1961 and subsequently promoted by [[LBJ]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Americanism&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|Originally, a phrase unique to American English, later, loyalty to America and its principles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bipartisan&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|emphasized by liberals when they are in the minority in power, but ignored by liberals when they are the majority in power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colonist&lt;br /&gt;
|1701&lt;br /&gt;
|settlers of a new country&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|compartmentalize&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|compartmentalizing the Bible away from knowledge and education leads to ignorance and despair&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|contrarian&lt;br /&gt;
|1657&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who delights in taking a position contrary to others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|eclectic&lt;br /&gt;
|1683&lt;br /&gt;
|taking the best from among different styles or ideas; compare [[best of the public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|evangelism&lt;br /&gt;
|1620-30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;isms&amp;quot; are usually pejorative, though this acquired a positive meaning over time, and perhaps from the outset&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|genetics&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|perhaps this should be on the conservative list?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|identity politics&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|exploiting racial, ethnic, gender alliances for political gain&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inane&lt;br /&gt;
|1662&lt;br /&gt;
|refers to comments, often made by liberals, that are utterly devoid of substance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|junk legislation&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|used initially by liberals to complain about the lack of meaningful legislation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1635-1645&lt;br /&gt;
|conservative?&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|multitasking&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|performing multiple tasks all at once&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|polar coordinates&lt;br /&gt;
|1694&lt;br /&gt;
|Newton may have used it earlier&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|republican&lt;br /&gt;
|1685&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reverse engineer&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|to deconstruct a product (or software) in order to understand how it works, often with the purpose of copying it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scrooge&lt;br /&gt;
|1843&lt;br /&gt;
|the main character in Charles Dickens' ''A Christmas Carol''; the story is based on materialism and is often used as a substitute for the Biblical account, but charity is a conservative value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|describes the use of deceit, particularly in politics; probably a conservative term, but will await more etymology about it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soapbox&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|now used pejoratively, but probably not initially when it was a way for the public to participate&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|states' rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1790&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals often invoke this too; Democrats were its biggest champions in the 1800s (in connection with slavery), and even today on issues like legalizing drugs and same-sex marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|technocrat&lt;br /&gt;
|1932&lt;br /&gt;
|technical expert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|telecommute&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term was in the British magazine ''The Economist''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a combination of a Greek root (&amp;quot;tele&amp;quot;, which means &amp;quot;far off&amp;quot;) and a Latin root (&amp;quot;commutare&amp;quot;, which means &amp;quot;to exchange&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tomfoolery&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|playful or foolish behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;beliefs of those opposed to [[modernism]], [[liberalism]], or [[radicalism]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[twilight zone]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|the realm of imagination that seems impossible but is difficult to disprove, and which challenges ordinary views of reality; also the terminator between night and day on a planetary body&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Whip&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In its political usage.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|late 1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|An elected position in each political party for the legislator responsible for gathering and confirming support for the party position on particular bills.  This term is derived from &amp;quot;whipper-in,&amp;quot; which in fox-hunting refers to the man who prevents hunting dogs from straying amid a chase.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2010/11/durbin_re-elected_number_two_s.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wiki&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|a website (or website software) that facilitates contributions and corrections by the public&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Downgraded Conservative Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These conservative terms are less significant:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|byzantine&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The usage here -- in sense of complex governmental rules -- probably developed later.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|connive&lt;br /&gt;
|1601&lt;br /&gt;
|to pretend ignorance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|eleemosynary&lt;br /&gt;
|1616&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to charity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entropy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|disorder&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[filibuster]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1851&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incandescent&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|bright and radiant, conquering darkness, precursor to the invention of the incandescent lamp (light bulb)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|luddite&lt;br /&gt;
|1811&lt;br /&gt;
|one who opposes and even destroys technological advances&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|media&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[milquetoast]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|timid and unassertive; easily persuaded or exploited; inspired by Caspar Milquetoast, the unassertive character in &amp;quot;The Timid Soul&amp;quot; cartoon strip by Harold T. Webster, which ran in the New York Herald Tribune on Sundays beginning in 1924.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|normalcy&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|related to the election of [[Warren G. Harding]] by the largest margin yet in history&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ne'er-do-well&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;an idle worthless person&amp;quot; - Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reticent&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|restrained in expression, presentation, or appearance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-indulgence&lt;br /&gt;
|1753&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smart aleck&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|an obnoxiously conceited and self-assertive person with pretensions to being superior to others. Etymology: Aleck, nickname for Alexander &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/smart%20alec Smart Aleck Merriam-Websters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ Merriam-Webster dictionary]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dictionary.reference.com/ Dictionary.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Conservapedia's Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Surprising Dates of Origin for Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Linguistic Analysis of Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Bible Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservapedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlaskanEconomy</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>