<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=AdkovTelmig</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=AdkovTelmig"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/AdkovTelmig"/>
	<updated>2026-10-15T14:11:01Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Living_Constitution&amp;diff=296648</id>
		<title>Living Constitution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Living_Constitution&amp;diff=296648"/>
		<updated>2007-09-20T16:43:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AdkovTelmig: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''living Constitution''' is one that changes based on perceptions of the changing views of the public.  As a practical matter, it means the [[U.S. Constitution]] should be interpreted however a majority of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] feels.  Such a constitution is often supported by conservatives who wish to abolish the very First Amendment by combining church and state into one all-powerful entity.  In such a system, The Leader As Endowed By Our Lord God George W. Bush would be able to proclaim far-reaching, oil-rich lands as provinces of America by declaring illegal, but holy, wars on them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The phrase &amp;quot;living Constitution&amp;quot; was expressly used by the [[liberal]] four-Justice dissent in ''Rummel v. Estelle'', 445 U.S. 263 (1980), and it has been implicitly embraced by the left side of the Court in numerous rulings.&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AdkovTelmig</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Living_Constitution&amp;diff=296646</id>
		<title>Living Constitution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Living_Constitution&amp;diff=296646"/>
		<updated>2007-09-20T16:42:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;AdkovTelmig: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''living Constitution''' is one that changes based on perceptions of the changing views of the public.  As a practical matter, it means the [[U.S. Constitution]] should be interpreted however a majority of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] feels.  Such a constitution is often supported by conservatives who wish to abolish the very First Amendment by combining church and state into one all-powerful entity.  In such a system, The Leader As Endowed By Our Lord God George W. Bush would be able to proclaim far-reaching, oil-rich lands as provinces of America&lt;br /&gt;
 by declaring illegal, but holy, wars on them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The phrase &amp;quot;living Constitution&amp;quot; was expressly used by the [[liberal]] four-Justice dissent in ''Rummel v. Estelle'', 445 U.S. 263 (1980), and it has been implicitly embraced by the left side of the Court in numerous rulings.&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AdkovTelmig</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>