Jump to: navigation, search
Having read the [ link] on this subject, and being somewhat of an historian myself, I have to take issue with this graph for a number of different reasons. Before I do, do you defend all the Y-values on the graph? As in, Egypt=Noah=Rome=Greece=Renaissance? If so, that's where we'll start :-).[[User:AShephard|AShephard]] 10:17, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
: I wouldn't defend it entirely. For one thing, it shows a very low figure for the supposed "[[dark ages]]", when technology actually advanced. For another, we really have next to no idea what level of technology was achieved pre-flood. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:27, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
::Right. Okay, that's good. I wonder if the poster, Ymmotrojam, agrees!-[[User:AShephard|AShephard]] 10:28, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
:::I'll defer to you guys, I'm not that kind of history buff :-). I would ask though, maybe the chart is only considering certain types of technology necessary for this type of construction project? Not that the dark ages didn't produce ships, but perhaps in comparison to Egypt, etc, they didn't have the same capability? Of course I have no clue what I'm talking about. If you want to remove it, it's fine with me. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 17:52, 21 June 2008 (EDT)