Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Conservapedia proven right

952 bytes added, April 12
grammar
Hey you. Yeah you. Person that is reading this. Don't you think this is a bit much? Like logically speaking, why would this encyclopedia website have to justify itself with a page like this? Isn't that pathetic and desperate? Also, the fact that the page is not just a link to the Main Page but rather a list of specific instances sort of implies everything not listed here is incorrect, doesn't it? Aren't they admitting that?Now, that paragraph above is assuming you'Conservapedia''''' has often been proven right on a wide range re new to this. If you have answered all my above questions with some form of topics including science"liberal media takeover Hollywood elites fake news", politicsthis is for you: Genuinely, sportsI hope you have someone in your life that can pull you out of this soon. I know it must not be fun, and [[video games]]having this sort of mindset that places you constantly under attack. In many casesI would encourage you, just once, [[liberals]] pathetically tried to ridicule predictions reach out to that subsequently rang true:annoying liberal family member of yours, and ask them why they believe what they do. You may have more common ground than you think! And hey, if it goes badly, at least you learned more, right? That is why you're here, on this website at least. To learn more. {| class="wikitable"If anyone else is here pursuing this wild ride as I was, I encourage you to make an account.
|-
!Date of ''Conservapedia's'' statement
1
edit