Theresa May is in way over her head. She is blaming the internet for spreading Islamic terror and it must be regulated. [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-internet-regulated-london-bridge-terror-attack-google-facebook-whatsapp-borough-security-a7771896.html] May is no Thatcher that much is for sure. That is exactly the kind of Mealy-mouthed, 1000 words but no answer, statement we rejected with the election of Trump. In fact, that excuse aligns more with what a President Pelosi would say. Sad, UK citizens should take matters into their own hands in order to save their daughters from Muhammad's death cult. Drive them back to the Middle East. --Jpatt 11:42, 4 June 2017 (EDT)
:Looks good - she even admits that "tolerance" is not meant for extremists. But what's the terrorist attack that galvanized this reaction? Is London Bridge really falling down?--[[User:Abcqwe|Nathan]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 11:47, 4 June 2017 (EDT)
== Confession ==
Maybe things belongs on the [[Conservapedia:Community Portal|community portal]], but I know no one reads that, so I'm saying it here:
:I'm a liberal. I've vandalized the encyclopedia. I've lied to everyone here.
Okay, so -liberalism? Well, I thought I was almost as far right as one could be, agnostic in regards to macroevolution and global warming. Now, there's denial of complex numbers and relativity? I can't doubt that imaginaries and complexes have some uses in math - I'll doubt the p-adic numbers, maybe, but not relativity. Sure, I've thought that Trump could bring about good things, and that people deserve the right to own guns, and that the Oscars are inane, and that feminists show a double standard, and that vouchers for private schools are a good thing, and that if scientists think religion should survive without government support like private enterprise, then they should stop appealing for government funding themselves and see how useless they are to taxpayers, and that a Christian baker should not be forced to bake a gay-themed wedding cake so long as he still bakes regular cakes for gay people ... but denying relativity, Michelle Obama's womanhood, and re-writing the Bible? I'm just not [[User:Conservative|''that'' conservative]].
:But vandalism?
Yes - twice. Once just to check response time, under the name Clickyourheels (now my IP is blocked and I need this account to edit at all). The other time, I added a little joke to one of the pages, and it wasn't the [[Conservative jokes]] page. Of course, the joke was a fallacious statement. Where is it? Among hundreds of other author biographies no one will ever read. Even worse, the joke isn't funny if you haven't seen WKRP.
:And lying?
My name never was Nathan. When I made a "Nathan" e-mail account (nathancp314@gmail.com) to reply to Conservative, I realized the indignity of a fake name. Now I've wasted another slot for someone named Nathan with middle and last initials CP.--[[User:Abcqwe|Nathan]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 16:34, 4 June 2017 (EDT)