User talk:Ladyinred58

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Stop filling articles with liberal bias, as you did in Witchcraft. ~ SharonTalk 10:23, 23 May 2007 (EDT)

We are trying to establish an alternative version of reality here. Your edits based on the currently existing reality could prove detrimental to this project. Please note the following 'rule' from Conservapedia:Locks and Blocks:
Sysop's and Bureaucrats are the Administrators of Conservapedia. Their instructions, as to Conservapedia policy and/or the appropriateness or inappropriateness of user actions, are to be followed. Failure to do so will result in the user being blocked.
Note: Their [[Special:Listusers%26group%3Dsysop|sysops]]] instructions, as to Conservapedia policy [...] are to be followed, that means when a sysop decides it is so, it is so. Questioning that may result in being blocked. Auld Nick 10:44, 23 May 2007 (EDT)

Apart from all that...


Hello, Ladyinred58, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, Ladyinred58!

Philip J. Rayment 10:50, 23 May 2007 (EDT)
Also, please sign your talk-page comments (Philip J. Rayment 10:50, 23 May 2007 (EDT)) or the signature button on the edit box toolbar), and please be careful how you edit. Not only did you overwrite the Witchcraft article (which you then restored), you also overwrote the existing discussion on the talk page of that article. Philip J. Rayment 10:50, 23 May 2007 (EDT)

LOL Don't let them get to you... If you know something about a subject by all means please share. Jros83 20:45, 7 September 2008 (EDT)

Personal tools