From Conservapedia
I don't see what was wrong with my edit. "No its not" doesn't really tell me what the problem was, and I was trying to find a middle ground so we still keep the primary religious definition while also allowing for non-belief in other things. ----ToJones 19:23, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
- Oh man, I thought you added that statement. I meant to remove it entirely, sorry. There are other reasons to come to disbelief besides "not knowing any better" and "irrationally refusing to accept", as the statement applies. HelpJazz 19:41, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
- Oh ok. I agree with you, but that clause kept getting reverted so I wanted to find some middle ground. No hard feelings. ----ToJones 19:43, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
- I just shouldn't edit while also watching TV :) HelpJazz 19:51, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
