Talk:Attack on Pearl Harbor

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Remember Pearl Harbor

2008 --Rcollins03 20:42, 7 December 2008 (EST)

Revisionist history

This article should stick with the basic historical facts about the attack. Anything else, such as the theories pertaining to FDR knowing in advance and encouraging it so America could get in the war or what officers ignored evidence, etc, could be considered revisionist history or attack theories. My suggestion would be to write a separate, detailed article on that particular subject. Karajou 10:36, 16 December 2008 (EST)

I agree. I also think the same should go for all of our articles. --Tim (CPAdmin1)talk Vote in my NEW polls 10:43, 16 December 2008 (EST)
Me, too. --Ed Poor Talk 10:45, 16 December 2008 (EST)

A short blurb here would be appropriate towards a redirect, i.e. "the attack on Pearl harbor has led to claims and theories about what FDR knew beforehand..." Karajou 11:09, 16 December 2008 (EST)

Personal tools