Environmental Protection Agency

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is a federal agency established in 1970 to protect the natural resources (e.g., air, water and land) and endangered species.[1] Its authority is established by a series of federal laws such as the Clean Air Act. Its administrator is appointed by the President, and is usually given Cabinet-level rank. The current Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency is Lisa P. Jackson.

It tries to play a mediating role in the debates between Conservation and environmentalism.

DDT

The most influential act of the EPA was to ban DDT, a decision that critics across the political spectrum say has resulted in deaths of millions annually in Africa from malaria. DDT is highly effective in eliminating malaria, as it did in the United States. The reason given for banning DDT was to protect numerous bird species and the harmless insects on which they depend for food, but groups across the political spectrum and even the New York Times have criticized the loss of human life, especially in Africa, caused by this ban[Citation Needed].

On April 2, 2007, the Supreme Court ruled that the EPA has the authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. This was a rebuke to the Bush administration, which had called for voluntary reduction of the gases. [2].

On 8 February, 2008, a federal appeals court struck down a mercury-control plan imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency. The court ruled that the Bush administration ignored the law when it imposed less stringent requirements on power plants to reduce mercury pollution, which scientists fear could cause neurological problems in 60,000 newborns a year.[3]


Global Warming

The EPA has ruled that CO2 is a health hazard and it is widely anticipated that the ruling will lead to legislation to control greenhouse gas emissions. The Competitive Enterprise Institute reported findings that countered EPA claims. The report was suppressed from public knowledge and the likely reason was politically motivated. [4]

References

  1. http://www.epa.gov
  2. Fox News: High Court Rebukes Bush on Car Pollution [1]
  3. Court strikes down EPA's plan on mercury
  4. EPA’s Proposed Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act Competitive Enterprise Institute
Personal tools